Using genetic data from Lee et al (2018), Davide Piffer has calculated polygenic scores for education/cognition for various populations around the World. Although these scores have very modest predictive power at the individual level, at the group level they correlate extremely well with IQ.
Below is a chart that reports these scores for 12 different “races” using two different polygenic scores (MTAG & PGS GWAS sig). In some cases the scores had to be inferred. For example the datasets did not have direct measures for Arctic people but because there was MTAG data on Mongolians and East Asians and because Mongolians are a hybrid of Arctic people and East Asians, their scores could be deduced.
The polygenic scores were converted to IQ equivalents by assigning the average European polygenic score an IQ of 99 (consistent with their psychometric scores) and assigning the average Bantu polygenic score an IQ of 80 (based on Richard Lynn’s 2006 estimate of how African Americans would average if they had no white admixture). From these two races, the IQs of all other races could be derived through linear extrapolation.
The most striking thing about the data is the clear correlation between genetic IQ and climate. All five of the top ranked races have light skin or lived in a cold climate during the ice age. Meanwhile the bottom four all have “Negroid” morphology, with the bottom three having never left sub-Saharan Africa. It is interesting that the bottom three never independently invented agriculture and the bottom two never made the neolithic transition at all, consistent with Richard Lynn’s theory that it was not until the last wurm glaciation about 20,000 years ago (which sub-Saharans did not endure) that humans became intelligent enough to take advantage of the wild grasses. By sadly killing everyone who was too dull to make fire, shelter and warm clothing, the last wurm glaciation probably raised North Eurasian IQ to near 90, and then only those with IQs of 93+ would make the leap to civilization. The exceptions are the Finns and the Arctic people who more or less reached triple digit IQ despite remaining essentially cavemen.
| Population | Average polygenic MTAG Raw score calculated by Davide Piffer derived from Lee et al. (2018) | PGS (GWAS sig) | Genetic IQ derived from polygenic MTAG | Genetic IQ derived from PGS (GWAS sig) | Average of the one or two genetic IQs |
Ashkenazi  | 50.038 | 106 | 106 | ||
East Asians | 0.505 | 49.75 | 99 | 104 | 102 |
Finnish | 49.456 | 101 | 101 | ||
Europeans | 0.505 | 49.167 | 99 | 99 | 99 |
Arctic people | 0.505 (estimated from the scores of Mongolians & East Asians) | 99 | 99 | ||
Southeast Asians | 0.501 | 93 | 93 | ||
South Asians & North Africans | 0.501 | 93 | 93 | ||
Native Americans | 0.494 | 48.6 (I subtracted 55% white & 15% black admixture since sample was Hispanic) | 83 | 94 | 89 |
Papuans | 0.498 | 89 | 89 | ||
Bantu | 0.492 | 46.83(I subtracted 25% white admixture since sample was Black Americans) | 80 | 80 | 80 |
pygmies | 0.484 | 68 | 68 | ||
Bushmen | 0.482 | 65 | 65 |
Note the PGS(Gwas sig) data is from Table 5 from the paper Evidence for Recent Polygenic Selection on Educational Attainment and Intelligence Inferred from Gwas Hits: A Replication of Previous Findings Using Recent Data. The MTAG raw data Piffer used is here:
Pumpkin Person 
This assumes that there is no portability problem (I’ve already established to you that there is).
If the polygenic scores weren’t portable they wouldn’t correlate so well with the IQs of races all over the world.
“PP, you admitted that “yes [PGS] become even more useless as a function of geographic distance from the reference population.”
We know that as certain trait values increase, that PGS decreases. We know that even WITHIN the training sample (white Britons) that the same thing occurs. Thus, there is a portability issue within and between populations (which has been understood for quite a while). This is pretty basic stuff. This is why the disconnect exists between twin studies and GWAS. There are, too, a whole slew of conceptual issues as well (see Kaplan and Fullerton, 2022 Polygenic risk, population structure and ongoing difficulties with race in human genetics, box 2 page 6).”
The portability problem refers to declining predictive power for INDIVIDUALS within populations. But what Piffer has shown is there’s still an extremely high predictive BETWEEN populations meaning they can strongly predict the AVERAGE of a population even if they can’t predict individuals within said populations, especially distant ones.
RR is a fringe scientist, nothing more. a conspiracy theorist like Alex Jones or something. why he’s allowed on this blog, i dunno.
Pumpkin must have a crush on him.
We know that there is non-transferability with PGSs BETWEEN populations because they don’t even translate WITHIN populations. It’s been OVER for PGS at the individual level (Hou et al and Hu et al) and now at the group level (Ding et al). (Piffer doesn’t adjust for LD, nevermind the Bird paper.)
Like I said: Once the new “gene toy” comes around, GWAS True Believers will agree with the critics and concede they were right all along while they tout their new toy (which will ultimately have the same fate as candidate gene studies and GWAS). Because hereditarians are chasing ghosts—what they want just doesn’t exist no matter how hard they try.
when PGS are non-transferable it means they don’t correlate with phenotype. At the group level they obviously do since high IQ races consistently have higher PGS than low IQ races so there’s no argument.
What are “racial” (ancestral) groups, though? GWAS doesn’t even identify causal genes. Piffer ignored LD and the portability problem. That’s a fact.
genomics gets cheaper every day
you won’t need gwas because the underlying energy metabolism of proteins will be solved
you will see first hand your IQ given your DNA profile run in simulators
simply DNA tests will tell you how much energy your brain potentially uses to change and grow
everyone can have a full genome by the next decade
Loaded why are you calling him a ‘scientist’. Hes a religious wackjob. He doesn’t understand even basic science. He never even made it out of high school and his job is to be in the gym.
As I explained in a banned comment, he doesnt even have the basic IQ levels to make simple deductions from data like Puppy.
AK and TP, explain why I’m wrong or stop talking. AK talking outright nonsense as usual. What else is new.
weve both explained 100 times in 10,000 word comments and youre so dumb you cant even understand basic a prior scientific points. Why dont you just go to black church and dance or something. Stop coming here.
Go ahead and explain why what I’m saying in this thread is wrong.
genes will be able the predict a persons individual intelligence level and other cognitive traits.
to dismiss this as nonsense makes you look ignorant
Go ahead and explain how that’s possible and how I’m wrong in that context.
plasticity can be understood dynamically
that’s just a fact
wrong about what?
“GWAS doesn’t even identify causal genes. Piffer ignored LD and the portability problem. That’s a fact.”
The Aztec and Inca had civilization.
yet you put them below 89
this is not scientific
you don’t understand how sampling works in statistics over time periods
Good point. I should have left out the line about civilization
what is the IQ of Aboriginals from Australia? Same as Papuans?
I always knew the Papuans were a smart group of people. otherwise they wouldve been wiped out by now by all these modern-day hippies aka Boomers trying to establish their Western culture dominance in the way Pill’s trying to do.
what a big W.
how do you know that the samples conform to an accurate distribution of the sample population.
27 Japanese people, would they be upper class or lower class, from high IQ cities or low IQ cities.
what p-value is there that shows this sample of 27 is representative of Japan?
and how do you know that 27 is best number to fit a proper curve. It doesn’t.
You need at least ten thousand samples before a curve begins to become normalized.
the genes then for this sample of 27 would not confirm anything close to a real representation of Japan?
it could just be random coincidence and same for all other population samples. What margin of error is there to say it’s not random. 1 sigma? 2 sigma? That is 1 in 6 or 1 in 50 chance it was random and compounded for the low number of samples.
What I am saying is that there could be selection bias for randomness.
i for example would not representative of white people because I am 10 points higher.
that means adding me to the sample would increase the IQ of whites by too much. You would need a lower IQ person to balance that out.
aggregated you’d need thousands of people representative of whites not less than 10,000
Less you get exaggerating scores.
like height you cannot select 27 people in Japan and tell me they represent the height of Japan people. Then do a poly on that sample 27 declaring a score.
statistics don’t work that way.
i select 33 random Australian people
use British gwas to find a poly score on height
then declare Australia is this this or that height
this is a selection bias for randomness
Cat even small samples can be pretty accurate because the standard error of a sample’s mean is the sample’s SD divided by the square root of the sample size.
But you said students at Harvard were selected for the SAT and you accounted for this.
who knows if the samples were truly random when 100 million people cannot all be tested on IQ tests?
If only hong kong and singapore were sampled and not all of China and they exclude test samples from rural areas then this is not representative?
pill is right that scores get thrown out but he is wrong in the way they are.
first of all
you don’t know if a kid is dumber because of the environment or genes.
you don’t know the cofounder variables.
you don’t know if all Genes have been accounted for
what if because of reaction norms kids need different things.
mug is correct that it’s bullshit you don’t have good food or good parents.
or anything you need to say what genes give a kid a good phenotype.
these experiments don’t explain why selection would not be random.
i could sample each ocean with 22 fish and each sample would tell me nothing about the fish ecology.
iq is the same
what makes the sample representative is not clear and doesn’t work given all factors involved.
Anime is a better person too. i think im a capable individual who is always being put down. i am not the most intellectual but i have an aesthetic purpose and thats why people think im a great person too.
And the black score is magically ’80’ the kind of religious price point puppy has been pushing for 20 years.
Obviously all the other scores could also be written in crayon if you see 1 number thats ridiculous like that.
The pygmies and other sub saharans are the correct numbers but puppy can’t use common sense to wonder why bantus are an SD higher??
Puppy can you just stop the religious crusade? I get it. You want blacks to be respected. Ok. I get it. But this is actually tarnishing the rest of the studies findings.
There’s been 100 years of research claiming the black American IQ is 85 but since black Americans are 25% whites, 80 has been assumed the IQ of “pure” Bantu reared in First World conditions (Lynn 2006). I find it very weird that you keep complaining this isn’t low enough. In my chart t’s nearly 10 points lower than even Native Americans & Papuans. The only people who are genetically lower are extremely fringe hunter-gatherers on the verge of extinction who completely failed to make the neolithic transition & have been isolated from the rest of humanity for hundreds of thousands of years,
only people who are genetically lower are extremely fringe hunter-gatherers on the verge of extinction who completely failed to make the neolithic transition & have been isolated from the rest of humanity for hundreds of thousands of years,
ie. You mean blacks in general.
Use basic deductive reasoning puppy. If Pygmies and bushmen are in the 60s and co-evolved with blacks in the exact same environment. How in the blue hell would blacks get another SD out of thin air?
You said yourself you need exposure to cold climate to get the pre-modern SD jump. Thats your own argument lol (which I dont fully believe, but whatever)
The army IQ testing has been finding mass retardate scores in blacks for decades pre-jewish civil rights era. After the ‘civil rights’ era, jews basically banned publishing the scores and doctored the remaining stuff. Anyone retarded simply wasnt allowed to sit the test. You never find it really weird how the jews dont send recruiters into the ghetto knowing everyone there is on bottom decile income?
But they send recruiters to hillbillies and illegals from the Bronx?
Deductive reasoning puppy. Just really basic stuff. Im not asking for something at my level or Marsha’s level.
Yes. I think youre gaming the scores up by at least 1.5SDs and maybe more. The empirical studies of blacks from PISA, Lynn, and even Mensa testing is consistent with Chris Langan/Me and not consistent with CNN.
You and Chris Langan are thinking of blacks living in Africa but it’s common sense that people living in Third World will be 1 SD below their potential in both IQ and height
everyone in the rap game is probably aware i exist, Pumpkin. for that sake i think it’s best to know that i have a very influential outlook!
“The army IQ testing has been finding mass retardate scores in blacks for decades pre-jewish civil rights era.”
Dumbass, those Army tests were heavily biased. Imagine trusting Lynn’s data when we know he cherry-picked.
https://www.statnews.com/2024/06/20/richard-lynn-racist-research-articles-journals-retractions/
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360665701_'National_IQ'_datasets_do_not_provide_accurate_unbiased_or_comparable_measures_of_cognitive_ability_worldwide
? But that doesnt explain why you think blacks are 1 or 2 SDs higher than Buhsmen or pygmys?
In all seriousness. Black africans never achieved anything more than bushmen or pygmies.
African IQ is low but not as low as Pill thinks because there are IQ is comparable to the Neanderthals or other early humans who basically had an IQ around 75 or 80.
they didnt invent much either. of course they had tools etc. and were very good at specialized projects as individuals but they could not compete with the faster, more adaptive homo sapiens.
so African IQ musnt be far off either. African IQ is proportionate to their achievements in art and other various endeavors they had. maybe they didnt build a civilization but like Pumpkin has said you need to cross over a threshold to get to a certain IQ high enough to build civilizations because unlike individual endeavors, societal endeavors require everyone to work together.
The average IQ of African-Americans is ~83.5 and on average they’re 19% European. This means the average IQ of pure Africans is 78.
Also, I’ve heard many people on the far right claim jews owned about half of all slaves but then why aren’t black americans part jewish? Were jews against mating with their slaves?
are you autistic?
No, I just flat out said the info I thought was important. Wouldn’t say it like that in person. Autism is so self-diagnosed by plain unlikable people that I steer clear of ever attributing it to myself.
ok
Your deductive reasoning is so bad sometimes I almost want to cry. You said Barack Obama was the most admired man in america with a 26% vote. And at least half of that was black men and haitians.
I just dont understand how someone could be making a simple inaccurate deduction like that if theyre 130IQ unless you bring in the religious aspect.
And you know, the religious stuff makes even Mugabe say really stupid stuff sometimes too.
Your deductive reasoning is so bad sometimes I almost want to cry. You said Barack Obama was the most admired man in america with a 26% vote
That’s cause it was an open-ended poll where you could literally choose any man on Earth. When the number of candidates is in the BILLIONS, getting even 10% can be enough to win. You are baffled by the most basic of logic.
Pill’s IQ is actually very low he doesnt understand how to make basic assumptions.
his intuition sucks. he doesnt know much. anyone who think his IQ is above 110 is a fool. his comments might be “lucid” but he makes very obvious mistakes in reasoning.
No one got more votes than Obama in votes for most admired.
pill thinks you need more than 51% because he thinks only 2 people can be voted for at any one time in an open poll.
This is another reason I don’t think he’s real. Like, this is such a dumbfoundingly stupid thing to say.
yeah his existence makes me doubt that this Universe is anything but a random simulation.
All of you are mind blowing low IQ clowns.
Ill make it very very simple so you can see the correct answer.
Lets say we use puppy’s ‘logic’.
Lets pretend USA is only 50 people. And 48 people all said a seperate different person. But 2 of those people said Barack Obama.
Puppy by his ‘logic’ or quant apsy logic would then compute that because 2/50 people said they admired obama, that means Obama is the most admired man in the country.
Now, if you actually print that story and people in other countries read it…They will think Obama is wildly popular and go on holiday and say how much they love obama to americans and the guy next to them in the bar is going to look at them and say ‘aint nobody here whos even heard of this obama person’.
And puppy will read this really simple analogy and still sit there and wag his finger at me for questioning a ridiculous jewish finding.
Your verbal IQ is low.
Most admired man != man admired by most people
Most admired man = man with more admirers than anyone else.
Its 50% quant but 50 verbal.
You just cant say ‘most admired man’ without giving a flat out exaggerated impression.
Say something else.
But of course the jews are so clever. And if you confront them, they will fall back on this autistic quanty logic even if its ridiculous and actually makes people hate the media even more for being woke.
No, Pill, we are not clowns, we are rational about this situation with you because, quite simply, you’re arrogant and stubborn.
you need to be humbled and brought to your knees.
ok pill
then who is most admired?
currently and why?
give criteria
Most admired man != man admired by most people
Most admired man = man with more admirers than anyone else.
No neurotypical person interperets it like that. Literally zero. Nobody thinks in ratio like that. You need to talk to real people and not AI like Anime
So I guess Gallup and all the news sources that cite them have not employed any neurotypicals in the last 80 years:
https://www.axios.com/2018/12/27/barack-michelle-obama-gallup-most-admired-people
Yeah… you cant even read poll numbers. I mean this is embarrassing.
I just realised how retarded puppy is even from an autistic perspective.
Most admired man != man admired by most people
Most admired man = man with more admirers than anyone else.
Most admired man is what it says on the tin.
But puppy says most admired man literally equals a completely different verbal formulation.
So why not use that verbal formulation instead of most admired man??
Puppy….
Remember that conversation we had about concepts and labels?
Please tell me you understood it.
I just dont know anymore.
Were you in an accident involving a head injury?
lol. Poor Pill.
So I guess Gallup and all the news sources that cite them have not employed any neurotypicals in the last 80 years
What this whole sorry debacle shows is that its comically easy to trick even ‘professional’ pollsters with BLM garbage.
Maybe Gallup should publish the approval rating of the media and explain why its in the toilet.
Tricking dumb people would be high on my list.
Oh so Gallup has been conspiring to trick people for 80 years into thinking the sitting President is the most admired man. Those sneaky bastards. What other conspiracy theories are you going to expose pill? Rice Krispies don’t actually snap, crackle and pop?
Jesus. Its called judgement. If 50% of american say Ronald Reagan is their number 1 choice. And the number 2 choice is 45 points behind. Then you can conclude ‘most admired man’, even in ratio terms.
But if 26% say it and the next best is 18% (ie trump) or whatever….the jews shoudlnt be saying Obama is ‘most admired man in america’ because its misleading.
Obviously jews are more intelligent than you socially so they know the misleading trickster aspect.
But you should have know from basic judgement of reading a poll what one should be able to infer or not infer.
This is like the time you said that poll of an elderly home was ‘representative’. Youre lucky your politican clients are mentally retarded and never really question your charts and tables.
But if 26% say it and the next best is 18% (ie trump) or whatever….the jews shoudlnt be saying Obama is ‘most admired man in america’ because its misleading.
No if they said Obama was most admired by a huge margin, that would be misleading. Instead they say Obama narrowly beat Trump as the most admired man. And btw Trump was the most admired man in 2020.
Obviously jews are more intelligent than you socially so they know the misleading trickster aspect.
No they’re more intelligent than you socially and so are East Asians.
Who had more admires than Obama when Obama was president pill?
you don’t understand how popularity works.
if Obama was the one with more votes than anyone else that means no one had more admires.
why would this be untrue?
what you are saying pill is that even if Obama was most popular it doesn’t matter because a smaller number of people had stronger feelings twords Trump?
strong feeling > number of followers
i mean if that’s the case Justin Bieber has the strongest followers and is most admired
Revealed: The trick Irish traveller families used at six bars in the same town… before suing them for thousands | Daily Mail Online
these are the Gypsies that Pill is related to.
If you somehow tied to a chair Rubin, Gould, Chomsky, Ben Shapiro, Jeff Zucker, Harvey Weinstein, Einstein etc etc and polled them on their genuine best guess for black IQ scores….
The estimate might even be lower than mine. And im dead serious.
100% correct! yet peepee thinks jews have made blacks more powerful.
sad.
peepee is just an extreme evil racist who hates hates hates white people.
Man, Mugabe must have stopped drinking and is 100% sober.
This is great news for the comment section. Were seeing a lot of sense in the last few weeks. A lot of good common sense.
If Jews have not made blacks more powerful, then why does pill keep claiming that for younger generations, being black is an advantage. You can’t have both ways by blaming Jews for discriminating against whites without also crediting them for helping blacks.
And how do I hate whites? I’m 50% white and 100% Aryan. You’re U.S. white which means 99% white, 1% black and 0% Aryan. Not my fault Piffer’s data does not put whites on top.
Puppy doest get basic dialectics. You can empower someone in silly ways and still leave them powerless.
Name 1 black person in the entire government, media or judicial system (Hi Clarence!) who doesnt take order from either a gentile or an ashkenazim?
Blacks have been empowered to sell rap albums and win 50 oscars or whatever. So being a high IQ black is like winning the lottery. But no black man in america has to power to order an invasion or lock up someone on a total whim.
But no black man in america has to power to order an invasion or lock up someone on a total whim.
No white man has that power either except for the President which means Obama had it too when he was President.
No white man has that power either except for the President which means Obama had it too when he was President
Are you 10 years old or something??? LOL the people that control politicians are more powerful than the politicians. In every country.
Name one.
Ive named the people who control the president going back 100 years maybe 50 or 60 times already. Just look up my old comments
Then it should be easy to name just one contemporary person
Michael Froman. Rubin. Harlan Crowe. Musk. I mean i could literally name 20 people more powerful than the president.
None of those men could order the President to invade a random country.
So libya wasnt toppled by Froman. Gotcha.
Guess i hallucinated and Obama really wanted that in his loins his whole life.
That was part of a neocon plan Wolfawitz had been punching since 1991. It was the hard work of hundreds of neocon think tank people spamming politicians with policy papers for DECADES. Froman an was just the figure head but he has ZERO real power. ZERO. Trump could literally toss him into some el salvador jail tomorrow and even CNN wouldn’t defend him because they’d be afraid it would draw attention to the neocons. You don’t understand the difference between individual power & group power because low verbal-social IQ.
?? Froman told Obama who would be in his cabinet. Read the exact email from the Wikileaks.
You think Obama even know who Gaddafi was?
I mean probably very vaguely. But overthrowing the libyan government was not his ‘order’.
Obama listened because he knew Froman spoke for a very powerful constituency. If Froman told him put David Duke in his cabinet Obama would have ignored him because he’d know at that point that Froman was no longer speaking for Wallstreet. So Wallstreet had the power, Froman was just their spokesman.
If Froman told him put David Duke in his cabinet Obama would have ignored him
Would he?
Of course
Im the last non BLM commenter here after years of purges. The only person to keep puppy’s ‘science’ honest.
Otherwise the blog would literally devolve into Puppy copying pasting links from CNN and BET
I’m not BLM you idiot. im just not a bigot and a corrupt, evil individual like you who wants to exterminate entire groups of people from this world.
you need to dial 999 and check yourself in for being such a really awful person. you are a danger to yourself and society.
more (((lies))) from the personality who thinks chauvin is guilty.
mugabe: i met pill at a hamburger restaurant in dublin. he was an empty chair.
https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic01.nyt.com%2Fimages%2F2016%2F07%2F13%2Fus%2F13fd-ginsburg%2F13fd-ginsburg-videoSixteenByNineJumbo1600.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=63604b4be93203ca65bce6e5311df9c8ea4b8029bad6db3238eb72526354f5b8
palestinians don’t look like that!
I think Chauvin is guilty yeah. But guilty of manslaughter. Or excessive force.
Not 1st or 2nd degree murder.
It doesnt take a genius to figure out Chauvin, like most cops, have deep disdain for the high testosterone barbarian community. Literally 90% of the job of a cop in an urban area in america is dealing with calls about blacks acting out.
So hes ‘guilty’ of by the letter of the law.
But if puppy would allow it, we should have a debate about the morality of the whole thing and whether excessive force can be justified. But puppy, being you know what, wants letter of the law until the cows come home.
By the letter of the law hes guilty yeah/
Look, nobody is more anti BLM than me. Dont even try to contest that.
DUDE!
YOU JUST LITERALLY OUT-ED YOURSELF!
AS…
A JEW!
SAD!
3 Peter and the other disciple started out for the tomb. 4 They were both running, but the other disciple outran Peter and reached the tomb first. 5 He stooped and looked in and saw the linen wrappings lying there, but he didn’t go in. 6 Then Simon Peter arrived and went inside. He also noticed the linen wrappings lying there, 7 while the cloth that had covered Jesus’ head was folded up and lying apart from the other wrappings. 8 Then the disciple who had reached the tomb first also went in, and he saw and believed—
24When Pilate saw that he was accomplishing nothing, but that instead a riot was breaking out, he took water and washed his hands before the crowd. “I am innocent of this man’s blood,” he said. “You bear the responsibility.”
25 All the people answered, “
His blood be on us and on our children!”
Before meditating, he would put down his clothes and the sacred thread aside, and meditate completely naked. When Hriday found this out, he confronted his uncle and asked him to explain his strange conduct. Ramakrishna answered that when one thinks about God, one should be free from all attachments and the eight servitudes of “hatred, fear, shame, aversion, egoism, vanity, noble descent, and good conduct.” He viewed his sacred thread as a display of the ego of his Brahmin descent and thus kept it aside, saying when calling upon the Mother, one should discard all such bondages and call on Her with a focused mind. He assured his nephew that he would put them on after the end of his meditation. Hriday was aghast at hearing this and left him in dismay.
25 All the people answered, “
His blood be on us and on our children!”
my mom is a really toxic and evil person. she reminds me of Anime.
i should apologize. for being LOADED. but at the same time, that would show weakness.
everyone on this blog is a shark to me. they pounce whenever they smell blood in the water.
but honestly i am a solid guy who’ll never fold.
https://imgur.com/a/dna-predictions-qPsC04r#dlVwlxF
this is the 141 genetic IQ i have according to polygenic scores.
polygenic scores have oor predictive power at the individual level
possibly but i think mine was fruitful.
just because it’s poor in an overall instance doesn’t mean its predictive power is useless or fails to hold value.
i’m pretty sure mine is accurate.. they say im very good at math in all the polygenic scores ive gotten for that.
i think this website is very thorough. it may have poor predictive power on some SNPs and such but not all of them and theyre making the predictive power go higher as the time goes by even at an individual level so this could be accurate.
another place, Geneplaza, said i was average, another place said i was very cognitively superior and Genomelink said i was above average.
my math ability genetically is highest though.
is no one going to talk about this?
i think i was stunted. it was unfair to me. i am a person with a optimistic attitude though.
there’s a big difference between intellectual output and input. absorption and externalization. because of this we see that there is something called introversion and extroversion and other dynamic personality types.
that is the basis of psychology.
one of the justifications for lower taxes on capital income is that capital is mobile while labor’s mobility is limited. money speaks every language without an accent and feels at home everywhere. this is why capital controls not just trade restrictions and immigration restrictions are necessary for any country that might claim to be a democracy.
most of the proletariat in the US thinks of capitalists as really really good or really really valuable workers, as labor aristocracy. and this is what capital wants them to think. elon musk is a genius engineer and scientist, blah, blah, blah.
in reality this is true only of very small businesses where the owner is also a “player coach” and his profits never amount to much more than his highest paid employee’s salary.
one of the reasons this lie can be maintained is that most pipo have never met a capitalist. and this because capitalists are such a tiny fraction of the population.
contra marx, capitalists do labor. but with marx their labor is ridiculously overcompensated, is an example of “economic rent”.
in the soviet union the job of capitalists was done by GOSPLAN.
the labor of the capitalist is very important. but it can be compensated a lot less and be just as good.
what is the labor of the capitalist? it is to decide what is worth doing.
the most valiant stakhanovite’s labor is pointless and stupid if what he’s trying to get done is pointless and stupid.
Its worse than that. A lot of ‘capitalists’ are trust fund kids that dont even know how to read properly.
You look at Elon and he was a trust fund kid like trump.
Forbes does its best to hide inherited wealth because it was low taxes on the trust fund community. If I remember right, steve forbes was also a trust fund kind.
The ‘economic value added’ Elon brings or Bezos is worth compensating. But its not tied to anything fundamental. Stock valuations in many companies are derived from kind of happenstance government policies and also just gambling.
US companies are worth double or triple forward earnings simply because the upper classes of the world see the reserve currency and the liquidity and have no other asset class to put money into.
In the old days the main asset was agricultural land and the upper class boosted the value of it the same way by not hoarding in any other asset class.
And agricultural land was much more important to the economy in those days than corporate production of Tesla or Apple is today. But the tesla or apple owner is maybe 50000 times richer than the peasent. Whereas the baron was worth maybe 500 times more in the old days.
Puppy will literally not even be able to understand this comment. He just going to keep chanting free market until he falls asleep.
so Elon has a good amount of resources but is it really about what you got or what you can do with it.
one guy doesn’t do the work but he is forced not to do certain things with the money.
people think the queen bee does all the work and yes you can kill her but the hive still functions fine a few years.
its not like Elon is some person that makes all the honey, he can be replaced like anything else in the system.
its stupid to think that we can just get rid of rich people and they would not be replaced in the structure of capitalism
its not the queen it’s not Elon it’s not Japan’s empourer, it is the system that keeps them there because they serve a function to the capital system and don’t need to be specific individuals.
pill don’t understand, he thinks that rich people exist because they are kings when infact they are beautocratic managers of capitalism.
they are not special
they exist because of capitalism which pill don’t understand.
the bureaucracy get them to the top and don’t care if they were rich or not as long as the purpose is served to keep the system in place.
pill cannot understand that it not rich people it’s beautocratic capital.
get rid of all billionaires and you would not solve anything it would only mean restructuring takes place where non rich people get to become the new leaders.
you will never get rid of leadership so pill blames the rich as if they were the problem when it has always been about the leaders instead.
you could say the rich are bad leaders but then pill has nothing that can replace the top positions of our beautocratic monied system.
what would they system look like without capital?
i don’t know because you’d have to have redistribution.
That requires getting rid of lots of money at the top into new programs.
and not everyone agrees what those programs would be for.
who would the leaders be then?
It be more technocracy.
Anime…..I know this is really hard for you to understand. But has it ever entered your mind the ‘free market’ is a man made system and not a natural science phenomenon?
has it ever occurred to you pill the even if it was man made it is not a top down system that can change overnight
you said your not a blank slateist (cold war Russia expected all people to conform by that metric)
if you think it can change top down what would need to be done?
peasant mind: but freedom n shit.
one of the “vices” of the soviet union was it made man’s lack of freedom within a vast industrial society much more obvious.
and who had the power was also made much more obvious.
in the united states the 99% believe they are free and that they live in a democracy.
in reality the US and other “western democracies” are no free-er or democratic than the USSR.
they are free-er in some ways and less free in others. but in toto the freedom is the same.
the difference is soviets knew how unfree they were.
it’s funny how peepee thinks she’s a brahmin and that brahmins are the master race yet is anti-religion. funny given that the brahmins are the priestly caste and not the richest caste, although richer than most castes.
At this injunction Ramakrishna strenuously objected and reminded Ramkumar that their father never officiated in the ceremonies of the purported ‘lower castes’ and refused to join him, but the will of Ramkumar prevailed in this matter.
so religion can be eugenic, maybe only because demand of literacy, in the case of brahmins and jews. but then it should be trampled under foot?
why are some religious minorities so smart and rich?
palestinian christians? the parsis? the quakers? the jains? the jews?
there are poor and stupid religious minorities too. but is it the same?
questions on this easter.
it’s because they’re either merchants or needed to adapt to very desperate situations in their history.
My Indian side has a Brahmin legacy, Mug. I’m not Pumpkin but i can tell you that that is true of me, maybe not him since i think he’s East African like Obama.
religion is indeed eugenic because it creates K-selected pressures in many smaller, more clannish religions.
it’s hard to read the second graphic of the charts with all the ethnic groups. i see Pathan which is the Pakistani group i belong to on there.
the ethnic groups are listed in alphabetical order. but the numbers are hard to read for what rank order they should be in.
what a fucking hasbara agent!
it should be The “genetic IQ” of twelve races.
race is a totally solid FACT! genetic IQ is NOT!
PLEASE change the title!
it is very simple to explain why a persons individual genes effect their cognitive traits.
a body and brain is made of plastic
and as anyone know a whole bunch of different plastics are possible.
so differences (physical differences) they exist because the materials genes effect.
like the outside appearance and function of the body you can see these differences so cognition would differ when the material is organized to function by shape size plasticity.
if you understand that both the materials and organization of them working in a functional system operate dynamically, then differences cannot be denied.
emotions as example
you can definitely see how the size of different limbic parts wired together effect the expression and reactions people have
genes can change how these limbic parts coordinate and grow given certain experiences because they can make materials unique to each individual.
Unique materials + unique dynamics
= unique cognitive traits
I see people with different traits all the time.
the reason is the organization of the materials in a dynamic way.
if that was not the case.
that all forms of organization results in the same cognition
Then math could not be used to show any dynamics were different for any reason.
differences = dynamics
or nothing at all
genetics is the potential or maximum people reach or in pleiotropic traits, something that is usually expressed in different ways.
so genetic IQ is the ceiling someone can reach and then the phenotype is anything that is around that genetic ceiling, i think lower than the genetic IQ because as i stated that is the paramount of a person’s intellectual level usually.
imagine if rr actually discovered that peepee was a jew.
SAD!
My performance IQ is too high to be Jewish
there are plenty of exceptional Jews at performance IQ that have low verbal. stop letting Pill influence you and get a mind of your own on this topic because just because a lot of people of a race cluster around a cognitive profile doesnt mean all of them will!
I knew a Jewish man around my age through a hospital we were both at many years ago. in Boston. he reminded me of William James Sidis.
the most brilliant man ever. what a tortured soul he was. both of them. all three of us.
forced to be a prodigy etc. he wasnt forced to do anything, the Jewish man in question but I know how that feels like more so.
the Jewish man would often play chess. he was very nice and friendly for a man suffering from schizophrenia as severe as Pill’s.
Your performance IQ is in the toilet. I bet there are even hasidic or ethiopian jews that can read a poll sheet properly.
I’m the equal of most Jews verbally, but run circles around 99.99% of Jews non-verbally.
i wonder how Jews like Bobby Fischer dominate chess so much if they have such poor visuo-spatial intelligence. myself, i’m halfway decent at chess but it’s hard to maintain clarity in where my best moves are because i cant visualize the board well.
there are literally dozens of components to spatial ability that are there. block design is nothing like matrices, etc.
They don’t have poor spatial, it’s just slightly worse than White Gentiles and much worse than East Asians. But it’s better than virtually every other race. And Jews are more likely to play chess than other races and chess reasoning can be verbalized.
The why did the jews trick you with a stupid headline on a poll?
Because it’s not stupid it’s brilliant. It explains why the sitting President has so much power despite seldom being spectacularly rich. Because there’s more to power than economic capital measured by how many dollars you have. There’s also political capital, measured by how many worshippers you have. The President is the most powerful man in the World because he’s worshipped like a God by more people in the World’s (sole) super power than is any other man.
i understand that, i was speaking in relative terms to other races. i wonder how Hispanic spatial is like because theyre Mongoloids like East Asians.
But obama (a) was admired by a small minority of people, of whom, mostly blacks.
(b) wasnt ‘worshipped’.
(c) cant actually order those followers to do anything. Not even able to motivate ghetto dwellers to actually register and vote lol
(d) got most of his power from jewish media empowering his sermons.
Trump on the other hand literally has the power to order his supporters to attack people or set buildings on fire and can get people to show up and vote and doesnt need any media support.
I agree that Trump’s power is more grassroots wich is a certain intangible that this poll can’t measure. By contrast Obama’s power was created by Queen Oprah who ordered Weinstein and other Jews to back him over Hillary. Still, I think you’re underestimating Obama’s power. When he was first inaugurated in 2008 the euphoria over having a black president made Obama truly God-like. And unlike Trump, Obama was powerful enough to not get impeached and dragged into court and found liable for sexual assault.
wow!
mugabe is literally dealing with legion.
SAD!
answer: YES!
9 Then Jesus asked him, “What is your name?”
“My name is Legion,” he replied, “for we are many.” 10 And he begged Jesus again and again not to send them out of the area.
Pill’s views are so subjective. of course there’s no factual basis around it. it’s quite impressive he looks to silence people on here who have a different view than him!
it’s disgusting this guy has so much influence. he needs to put a pipe in it.
he makes bold claims and doesnt back it up with anything. none of anything he says is grounded in substance. he just wants to argue for the sake of argument, something that i find to be very low IQ.
i think that Mug is my biggest inspiration on here. i have adopted his way of speaking and thinking. like he said, we are natural born non-NPCs.
my biggest framework and belief is that “don’t bite the hand that feeds.” that is why i look to have an altruistically reciprocity-based relationship with Pumpkin.
yet he scorns me. i dunno why.
my friend told me my baby picture profile photo looks like Bill Gates. I’m in love with Bill Gates’ daughter. i follow her on instagram. she’s really cute. Phoebe Gates.
i wish i could marry her.
YES! religion is is TOTALLY gay and retarded.
FACT!
but NO! it’s NOT! NOT exactly.
https://nypost.com/2025/04/18/science/jesus-crucifixion-linked-to-lunar-eclipse-according-to-nasa-discovery-and-it-could-pinpoint-the-day-he-died/
or maybe just a bunch of crap and jesus was fed to dogs.
point is…it doesn’t matter!
Religion is stupid by DEFINITION! If it’s rational it’s not a religion
Religion is built on faith. faith is not rational for many reasons. if anything were to exist after our deaths we would have no direct way of knowing it was connected to our lives here and in the present.
heard flew through habermas…
gary not jurgen!
who the fuck is flew?
evidence n shit!
this is the problem!
HARD CORE BATH HOUSE SHIT!
[deleted by peepee!]
SAD!
SAD!
SAD!
from oprah to rogan.
evidence of what?
WHAT?!
peepee, flew, dawkins, various homo-bi-trans-sexual atheists.
mugabe: right! have you actually READ any of my comments?
LET ME PUT IT INTO REALITY FOR MEN AND WOMEN!
SHE WANTS YOU TO BE AT LEAST 4 INCHES TALLER THAN SHE IS!
SAD!
FACT!
WYBOYS WIN!
CCCP WINS!
BORZOV WINS!
FACTS ARE SAD!
for pipo who are NOT canadians hockey has its yankees and celtics and green bay packers COMBINED!
and that team is the Montreal Canadiens!
and hey could beat the USSR!
FACTS ARE SAD!
Pope Francis brought an outsider’s eye to the papacy – with a focus on justice, ecology and humanity | Catherine Pepinster | The Guardian
To be fair, Pope Francis was a good pope. I disagree with him on migrants but agree with him on most other topics.
Scriabin plays Scriabin Poem Op. 32 No. 1, Fis-dur
Top 0.1% musical IQ.
But totally insane.
“The worship of the ancient golden calf has returned in a new and ruthless guise in the idolatry of money”
100% correct. more wisdom in 1 sentence than 10,000 autism economics papers
you’re the one who worships money. your whole life is built around the superficial! it doesn’t take a wise person to know money is evil either.
you might be broke but unless you’re a Communist like Melo, you’re not making a lot of sense.
you’ve been brainwashed in the opposite way than those extreme left-wing people have. it’s still bad.
the pope dying on easter is like jefferson and adams dying on july 4.
did brian mulroney die on wayne gretzky’s birthday?
sad.
Alexander Ovechkin, the Russki, has more goals, so that Canadian cuck (Gretzky) is not the greatest any more.
this is why marcionism and [redacted by peepee]ism are NOT the same.
the OT is totally awe-some in many ways!
hint: jews today are NOT the jews of yesterday. the jews of yesterday were palestinians. fact!
this is a yuge thing for so many would be nazis. they identify ancient judaism and christianity with contemporary soi-disant jews. and therefore reject it.
AIDS!
Morrissey – Suedehead
Morrisey is the a true irishman. Very proud of morrrisey and his musical geniues.
We need a blog post on the greateness of irishmen. Im happy to guest post.
Top 3 Irishmen:
WB Yeats was close. Very close to the top 3:
“(1) by 1896 Yeats had already some inkling of the cyclical theory of history which he was later to develop and expound in A Vision; (2) The Trojan war, the birth of Christ, and an indefinite event due to happen in our century were already considered by him as three fundamental crises in world history, each of which reverse the established order and ushered in a new cycle of civilization . . .”[14]
100% correct. Great man.
In my opinon the ‘indefinite event’ was the russian revolution. Yeats may have not been alive to see the full consequences of it.
And english wasnt even our native language in 1890 lol. And he still won the nobel literature prize hahaha.
William Butler Yeats (/jeɪts/, 13 June 1865 – 28 January 1939) was an Irish poet, dramatist and writer, and one of the foremost figures of 20th-century literature. He was a driving force behind the Irish Literary Revival, and along with John Millington Synge and Lady Gregory founded the Abbey Theatre, serving as its chief during its early years. He was awarded the 1923 Nobel Prize in Literature, and later served two terms as a Senator of the Irish Free State.
Look it was a very close choice between me and WB yeats. I admit I almost chose him over me.
I have to admit that Irish people dominate talk shows and poetry and literature but for whatever reason never evolved to do well in science and math like germanics and jews.
Look it is what it is.
For an Irish person to win the nobel prize in lit when the standards were real and proper is just….look thats an incredible achievement in the 20s when our gdp was the same as argentina or cuba.
Believe me puppy. Chris Matthews respects WB Yeats and his output. Ive heard him quote Yeats multiple times on tv.
The best fiction writer of the 20th century wasnt irish though. It was.. that guy:
Jorge Luis Borges – Wikipedia
Look hands up. Hes the best fiction writer. He got us on that one.
poetry wise, John Milton or Dante Alighieri were better than anyone of the modern or contemporary eras.
Mug seems to be a fan of William Blake. i would say the best 20th century fictional author was probably someone besides Borges but the most prolific creative of the 20th century has George Lucas up there.
or Steven Spielberg. their content is very well put together, thorough, and explorative.
Borges was never awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature, something which continually distressed the writer.[11] He was one of several distinguished authors who never received the honour.[127] Borges commented, “Not granting me the Nobel Prize has become a Scandinavian tradition; since I was born they have not been granting it to me.”[128] Some observers speculated that Borges did not receive the award in his later life because of his conservative political views, or more specifically because he had accepted an honour from Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet.[129][130]
Because people like RR and Puppy were on the committee. The fact Borges never won the nobel is…its like saying Terry Tao can’t do addition and subtraction.
Actually people say James Joyce was the best fiction writer of the 20th century and as an irishman I have to pretend to say that.
but borges is just a better writer. Joyce is too theoretical.
Its like when people ask me if tullamore or jameson is better than Johnny walker. And honestly, the scots got us on that one. But in public i have to toe the line.
I’m very proud that irish people are the top 1% of verbal intelligence and artisitic writing.
I agree we evolved to be the blacks of europe and to do violence and get addicted to drugs.
But our literature achivements are weird because english wasnt our native language for most of our hisotory. Caint gailege and all that.
Overall im proud to be an irishman. Whereas Loaded is embarrassed to be pakistani or melo is embarrassed to be philipino.
fuck you. im not embarrassed to be anything you dimwit. you’re Irish Traveler, aka Black Irish, aka scum of the Earth.
they’re literally Gypsies. they could pass as Indian the way they look. they’re r-selected and probably the lowest IQ European ethnic group there is.
that’s not something i’d be proud of.
But I respect Joyce and his literature. I read Portrait of the Artist and it reminded me alot of of my childhood and the people I knew.
But Borges is like you know. Some sort of meteor.
Joyce is very analytical whereas Borges is full schiz. Look at him. his eyes are screwball lol.
When I first started reading Borges I was really confused. I didnt know he was a satire or surrealist. i was reading him like a ‘normal’ high lit person.
Borges and the jew Rod Serling in theatre/motion drama have more in common than with other writers.
Theyre like a new category specifically invented in the 20th century.
Poetry is just a different category to fiction. People that lump the two together have a bottom 10% VIQ.
Best 20th century poet…again it wasn;t an Irishman.
IMO it was this guy:
T. S. Eliot – Wikipedia
he was gay and dumb. probably wouldve been a tranny in this day and age.
poetry is not fiction, it’s like a memoir meaning it’s based on truth and mixed with abstractions, you imbecile.
The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock | The Poetry Foundation
Is this the greatest work of 20th century literature?
Yes
It is.
But I realise its somewhat subjective.
Let us go then, you and I,
When the evening is spread out against the sky
Like a patient etherized upon a table;
Let us go, through certain half-deserted streets,
The muttering retreats
Of restless nights in one-night cheap hotels
And sawdust restaurants with oyster-shells:
Streets that follow like a tedious argument
Of insidious intent
To lead you to an overwhelming question …
it would take me and marsha and bruno and Jimmy comined 100 years to come up with just 1 stanza like this.
As Pill walked in the night, he saw the fear and fright of might. he saw with no conviction, his loss of benediction.
he was fraught with hate but like a plate he sat and wait. as the world thus turned, he laughed and burned like butter churned.
Did you write that yourself Loaded? It’s pretty good.
thank you. i plan on making three rap songs with this underground artist. i didnt use chatgpt for this at all but i may for the rap song, at least partially.
it’s much harder for me to write rap than poetry.
here’s another one:
“I flew along a darkened path, with only myself and Pill’s wrath. for sorrow holds what we behold, nothing new but the view. and what few would spew the hatred in heart as does Pill when he stands still.
for that reason i must season the very beacon of lightning hope. we mustnt cope too or it will end with no scope that’s true.”
i remember that guy Cartouche making a stupid poem that i should hang myself just because i was expressing myself poetically. he claimed he had an IQ of 160 but i think that was only in math. his poetry sucked compared to mine!
Thats AI dumbass. You think soeone that out of it can even put 1 sentence together?
That’s why I asked if he wrote it
it’s not AI you fucking idiots. i knew Pill would say something stupid like that.
if it was AI how would i be able to write multiple variations of a poem that dont even sound similar.
you try writing it through AI if you think im that dumb and you think youre so smart.
assholes!
and you believe this cocksucker, Pumpkin? that just shows how much lacking in discernment and intelligence you must be.
instead of commending me (you did but just barely) on writing a masterpiece you agree with this son of a bitch Pill who obviously thinks anyone or everyone who he thinks cant do something is actually not doing something!
freaks!
No I believe you wrote it, I just wasn’t 100% sure
and what did you think of it? other than it being just “good.” i want details from you for once.
I liked the rhyming of fancy words like benediction: catchy & clever.
fancy words like mangina. catchy & clever.
peepee how old do you think oprah’s mangina is?
has she had a mangina transplant?
Thank you! I appreciate that a lot! I’ll write another one, this time about you, in honor of your blog:
“The person whom we knew most changed the range of the obscure post. No one could fathom the stage for all the world is a play. So we sewed on our gloves and raised our heads highly above! and stricken with greatness was the Pumpkin who retired the feelings of corruption we felt. For the sake of fear he stayed clear but his courage was power in this time, in this hour!”
something of a nice little poem that touches on many subject matters yet is abstract enough to relate to a singular topic such as yours!