Apparently many liberals are leaving X for Bluesky so I decided to check it out and the first thing I see is:

First of all, thank you for comparing billionaires to monkeys hording bananas because the reason I’m so fascinated by the rich is they are winners in the very Darwinian struggle for resources that made us human and so this is a metaphor I thought I invented.
But unfortunately Knudsen draws the wrong conclusion. The monkey that horded all the bananas might be wrong from a moral perspective, but it was the monkey that passed on the big brained genes that allowed it to exploit its environment so efficiently and whose lineage would one day give rise to humans. Even if it personally could not eat all the bananas or feed them to its kids and members of its troop, the fact that its banana hording kept other monkeys from eating, and thus breeding, allowed its big brained genes to further monopolize the gene pool and because its even bigger brained descendants did the same, brain size tripled in four million years of evolution.

And of course what makes another rich person like Oprah so fascinating is she LITERALLY has a brain TRIPLE the size of many women and the XXXXX large hat measurements to go with it.

Just as humans are the most physically disadvantaged animal (slow, weak, no fur, no claws, small teeth) we TURNED the situation to our advantage (the definition of intelligence) to become the most powerful and prosperous animal on Earth using, Oprah overcame every disadvantage (poverty, lower class, sexually abused, dark skinned black looking black, female, overweight) to become the first multibillionaire black in American history, and, at her peak, the most worshiped woman ever within the World’s sole super power. Too bad she didn’t use her money and power to flood the Earth with Oprah clones or we could have had four million years of brain size evolution in one generation, though her African school for future leaders are kind of like the clones she never had.

Even Elon hasn’t cloned himself (yet) but he seems obsessed with his genetic legacy nonetheless. He has twelve kids, is determined to get human genes to Mars in case a meteor destroys the Earth, is encouraging other Americans (most of whom resemble him genetically) to become super breeders, is devestared that one of his kids is trans (because fewer grandkids?) and helped elect Donald Trump who vows to deport illegal immigrants (and thus preserve Elon’s gene pool)
Elon is unique in that he is consciously choosing to pass on his genes. The monkey hording the banana is just being greedy, it does not know or care about the evolutionary consequences and neither have the vast majority of humans for the vast majority of history.
Redistribution is a social not a technology problem. It is not really feasible without everyone working together. Elon Musk even if smart is not capable of manipulating people to work together at that scale. It is not his fault that collectively people don’t cooperate. And just because he has resources doesn’t mean he can do whatever he wants. Many people are in the corporations where he is mostly just the mascot. The board of directors are the ones who he must answer to.
As per your definition of intelligence, it all boils down to a technical mechanism. That is memory and attention control. The brain network can be copied into a.i. and this is understandable by many people how to make machines smarter than people. We don’t need definitions in words then because we have the schematics.
Your body and mind moves in certain ways, this takes self awareness. If you can see how this happens inside you then you know what intelligence is.
Musk can, quite literally, do whatever he wants. All that boogeymanning about George Soros from anti-semitic retards, and here Elon has successfully utilized his resources to have the most powerful man and country in his pocket. He doesn’t have to answer to anyone. He’s a spoiled piss baby.
How is it feasible that musk could get people to cooperate. You cannot even cooperate with people here on this blog? That is proof poverty cannot be solved by one guy.
But wasn’t it largely the media, DEI, (who support your side Melo) and the neocon’s fault that Trump won?
Musk clearly wanted to back out of the Twitter deal, but was forced into it. Then he did a bunch of possibly stupid things like adding Premium and changing it X and becoming politically charged… he also removed a bunch of DEI hires leaving only autistic men… the DEI hires that Melo would say were necessary so that they would have opportunity to use the means of production and become just as good as them as those pesky socially inept engineers.
The media is extremely powerful, as Trump claimed, and as powerful liberals know, including the Jewish lobby. So the influence of X actually helped steer people away from Harris. It was one factor.
Obviously we know why neocons would prefer Trump and anyone who could influence White men (or basically men with self-respect and some ability) to fight their wars for them and make the US actually look like a threat on the world stage again, while still being in the pocket of their donors and big business for the most part.
Musk was either lucky or smart, it has nothing to do with him being spoiled, though, relatively to any other Big Tech bro.
“But wasn’t it largely the media, DEI, (who support your side Melo) and the neocon’s fault that Trump won?”
I mean, yeah. Mainly the Media, and Elon now controls a large part of it and may be trying to consolidate more soon.
“make the US actually look like a threat on the world stage again,”
Bro, Trump is the laughingstock of the world. We are a fucking joke now. That’s just going to get worse because trump is an isolationist and isolationism is dumb.
“Musk was either lucky or smart, it has nothing to do with him being spoiled, though, relatively to any other Big Tech bro”
I’m just talking about the way he acts dude. He literally cannot handle any criticism or not getting attention he thinks he deserves.
Like when a post from Biden got WAYYYY more interaction than his and he held an emergency meeting in his company to try and force the algorithm to shove his content in everyone’s face.
I admire him. Unlike most alt-right people who just constantly complain that liberals or Jews run the media and buy all the politicians, he actually did something about it and bought twitter and bought the most important politician. Now they can’t blame the Jews for everything. I also like how he refuses to leave Mar-a-Lago and is annoying Trump’s staff by acting like the co-president
My favorite is “Soros bad!” “Where’s the George Soros of the Right?!” Dude is so cringe. And a hypocrite.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/elon-musk-dubs-himself-george-soros-middle
Youre using a fundamentalist viewpoint of why things are happening when there needs 2 be details n emergences of patterns that shape the governance of what youre saying in your comment
Theres no right answer per se because it lacks the creation of something actualized
On a completely different note why oh why did tit delete the comments on your blog
You really are the type of person 2 disregard other peoples self worth n expectations! N 4 that I can say I really have no hope 4 you
Internet was costing me $80 a month and the social worker said I could not afford it anymore. My phone costs $35 a month.
I lost my passwords and everything.
im not blaming anyone 4 my problems if anything its the other way around people are projectionists
I only attack the character because I anticipate change!
anyways I value myself because ive made a difference!
Damn, my bill is 5 a month.
$5.
Anime you have such poor construction of ideas its impossible 2 appreciate
the commenters on this blog are failed propagandists
on top of that they can never take criticism especially if it is constructive so they fall in2 a backwards category
all y’all anticipate things instead of allowing novelty play out
real bitter n weird people who cant accept consequences
cmon PP stop hiding whats happening from the people who need 2 know
youre some really insignificant person whose claim 2 fame will be being a conman
give up PP
Bro, you can’t even take constructive criticism much less give it.
Fuck off
The difference is obviously that people like Elon have intrinsic advantages in “hoarding bananas” vs someone like Oprah.
PP what do you think my social IQ is Aeoli n Anime say its 140 n I think its even higher than that im very discerning
Its sad my life has n will always be full of one thing n dats disappointment
Theres no thing that can alter my internalized feelings concerning the matter!
If you find yourself sincerely asking what your “social IQ” is on an Internet forum, it’s probably not very high. With respect.
Take advice from Trump:
“I try and tell myself it doesn’t matter. Nothing matters. If you tell yourself it doesn’t matter, like you do shows, you do this, you do that, and then you have earthquakes in India where 400,000 people get killed. Honestly, it doesn’t matter. That’s how I handle stress.”
Keep your chin up, king. Your crown almost fell off there.
Yes I’m still using the same email, PP.
Cool, I’ll send the email today
I do something similar to Trump’s method. I imagine the worst case scenario will happen and just train myself to accept it.
I’ve always admired Trump’s willingness to put himself in situations that he knows will cause stress. Most celebs, especially at his level, are so scared to rock the boat but he’s utterly fearless. Ezra Klein thinks one of the keys to Trump’s success is his extremely low inhibition (opposite of consciousnesses on the big 5 personality model according to Ezra)
Is it low conscientiousness or extremely low neuroticism plus extremely high extroversion? Trump I think he is very high in conscientiousness. He’s obsessed with success. He loathes tardiness and poor dress. He has never had alcohol. He’ll commit his faux pas here and there, but “when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.” Much of his gauche behavior I believe is calculated and strategic.
You might be right. I was just repeating what Ezra said, but I saw a documentary that said Trump is very different behind the scenes like you say. Oprah has also said that about Trump.
The person in the documentary I saw (his ghost writer iirc) implied his extroversion is part of what’s what’s calculated and he’s actually an introvert. One reason for thinking Ezra might be right about extremely low conscientiousness is he’s a huge risk taker. Sometimes the gambles pay off (elected president twice, became a multibillionaire) and sometimes they almost ruin him (shot in the ear, was briefly in debt for hundreds of millions, almost went to jail)
you fucking idiot youre retarded yourself im just wondering out of curiosity what he thinks I already know the dumbasses opinion isnt valid in any way just like the rest of his retarded bullshit I was just trying 2 gauge where his mind was at
dumbass
its a fucking shit test you faggot moron!!!
hence why I ask these questions repeatedly 2 gauge where theyre at mentally
I never ask you this shit n ironically enough your incompetence seems 2 shine thru because your idiot pea brain really thinks im involving u in my convos or sumn
I live in your peanut skull rent free cracker
Matthew 5:30, Loaded! Don’t let your neuroticism compromise your smarts! It’s in you to be a more than worthwhile person. Just don’t be a bitch – because there’s no point.
PP, fearlessness is a psychopathic trait. A beneficial one (some times), as opposed to, say, high impulsivity, which is negative.*
I don’t think it’s the opposite of conscientiousness. You can be fearless and industrious, a planner etc.
Teffec, it’s either very hard to not let your neuroticism lower your practical intelligence or outright impossible. You can use meditation, self-reflection, develop methods etc but you still won’t perform at your full IQ potential. But it might give you an edge in some forms of creativity.
your Christ never existed the whole framework of the Universe is against that notion of belief wigger
Im not a bitch you freak retard im superior 2 u firstly I dont need anything from u n I certainly am not in debt 2 anyone especially any1 on dis shithole blog!
theres always a point 2 sumn u guys dont understand perspective interactions impact n influence!
Impulsivity is not bad u guys just dont kno how 2 get things done in the moment ur supposed 2 be playing present minded in such scenarios
u guys are backwards real dishonest n ur lack of imaginations hold u back!
jus give up u worthless parasites
At the time I lost internet I also had to get rid of my pet dog. I was very sad.
Loaded if you just stop blaming others for your problems and attacking their character then less people would dislike you. All I am saying is you need to value yourself more than expect others to do it for you.
I dont care about being liked people only like those that see as being necessary 2 their well being im not sure if being liked is actually a remedy 2 the sort of pain ive endured
they didn’t attack me because they didnt like me they attacked me because I didnt care whether or not they did
all I want is 2 be left alone or respected or unwavering loyalty from those who profess their desire 4 me!
Exactly.
what exactly you fool. I just told you that you guys are worthless n unproductive 2 me there is no single reason id let u guys direct the way my life goes any further
you guys are the path of most resistance really dumb people with limited value n no understanding of cause n effect reciprocation etc
PP is allowing wishful thinking against me!
@Pumpkin Person
Have you seen the show Star Gate SG1
A specie’s of aliens in the show have big brains and small bodies. There is a scientific reason for this. Food intake. They use their brain for complex mathematics orientation. It is visual. Their bodies need less energy for the immune system. Thus food can be purely synthetic.
If we go to space we may need less physical control of the body but still need control of space ships. The brain would then be more like a video game cockpit. Working memory would increase to pay attention to many things at the same time. Elon Musk has made software for kids education to do that.
Peter Thiel iq?
greater or lower than musk?
Theil’s supposedly better at the SAT and chess, but he comes across as kind of dumb when asked about politics:
Oh come on PP. That was probably Thiel’s worst public/verbal moment. I assume because he was anxious to keep the balance between being a Zionist puppet and not sounding like a pro-genocide psychopath.
Yeah, those two clips they showed were cherry picked. I need to see the full interview.
I mean, Elon comes across as kind of dumb when asked about politics.
u queers need 2 stop 4cing shit when no opportunity 4 any of your successes exist
u guys are the biggest losers of society n its very obvious start being humble all yall lack any life experience
demented n worthless freaks!
Theil is really smart. But so is Musk.
Its a pity both are libertarian/somewhat autisitc.
I’m not a doctor, but, Loady, your current situation seems to require you to take some anti-psychotic drug. Please visit a psychiatrist. This is not meant as a piece of criticism. You seem out of control.
you guys cant do anything productive especially when it involves being in4mative. Really insincere n angry people on this blog always acting with a savior complex
you guys are not making any positive impacts except 2 those who you consider your in group or those who work within ur agendas
When it circles back 2 me I think you guys are a bunch of frauds
this PP fool keeps censoring my honest criticisms of you guys
yall need 2 learn 2 face truth n acknowledge how things are actually going because it seems as though all of you just want 2 carry out your narrative with least resistance
^^^Kamala Harris
i dont see the downside of that n I dont think you have the IQ 2 explain
peepee’s low IQ is annoying.
all but 2T of the federal budget is things like social security and medicare.
in order to cut 2T from the 6.7T budget would require the US have NO military and NO employees.
musk is either retarded or a FRAUD!
DOGEfficiency.
efficiency means doing all the same things but for less.
that’s a great idea.
but musk and ramaswamy can’t cut anywhere near 2T without doing less. in which case “efficiency” is a very MISLEADING name.
they should be more than happy to save 200b.
large organizations of all kinds have waste and have economies of scale. the profit motive doesn’t eliminate waste. “no but ayn rand and thomas sowell n shit.” ayn rand and thomas sowell are clowns who have no experience in the real world.
lack of profit motive creates unique inefficiencies. but in general the federal government is more like a financial co than any co musk has run. it takes in an spends. the waste in its labor expense and overhead is no where near 2T.
even if every employee of the federal government were a clone of elon or vivek the most they could cut and maintain services would be 200b.
if they wanna go after the military they could cut another 200b.
You could save a lot of money but it would involve pissing off the donors.
I’ve just saved $4t.
That exercise took me 30 seconds.
I’m glad we agree on this. You cannot cut $2T worth of government spending without having severe negative side effects. At the most there are maybe a few hundred billion in actual waste.
Anyone who disagrees is just completely ignorant of how our government functions.
in a high trust conscientious society government works a lot better. “but muh ayn rand n shit.” japan became the envy of the world from 1945 to 1990 without merit based promotions. promotion was based on seniority to a ridiculous extent. “but thomas sowell told me that then pipo would be lazy n shit.” thomas sowell is autistic. it worked in japan because CONSCIENTIOUSNESS.
^True about Japan
Japan is an overrated culture language land whatever
they got more fucked up things about these categories than there are positives
peepee is psychotic. she thinks oprah has a large head with ZERO evidence. she thinks she herself has a score above 85 on an IQ test. and all of the commenters on her blog are her except me. peepee is a severely physically disabled retarded person yet is also a sociopath. a rare combination.
You’re being a hypocrite. You expect people to believe you have high IQ because you have SAT scores but you deny Oprah’s head size even though she has circumference & hat size measurements
^^^PSYCHOSIS^^^
oprah has NO circumfernce or hat size measurements.
YOU ARE A PSYCHOTIC AUTISTIC SOCIOPATH.
APE FACE + GIANT HAIR != LARGE HEAD.
She mentioned her head circumference is 25.25″ around. I’m sure some of that is hair, but most women have hair and her head is still +6.3 SD above the female mean.
Also, even when she went bald, they couldn’t find a wig to fit her head
Further confirmation of her huge head comes from Gene Siskel mentioning that his hatter was stunned by the size of Oprah’s head and Letterman being told that her hat size is 8 (which btw corresponds with 25.25″)
And even when her hair is pulled back tight, her cranium is triple the size of Cynthia Erivo’s, Sorry but you’d have to be a complete idiot to not see she has a huge head:
I don’t know why you’d argue against Oprah having a big head and being very high IQ.
Her high intelligence but often stupid/self-serving opinions on politics and low-brow quips early in her career just makes her look more evil and low impulse control or neurotic. Contrast that to Langan’s yuge head and IQ where he also has disagreeable opinions to many but has generally lived his life in a more subtle, respectable way. So either way it doesn’t really make Oprah look better, seeing as she is what she morally is either way.
Because, much like Pill, he doesn’t like the way she looks. Her features are too Negroid and like millions of others, he’s utterly disgusted by someone who looks like that getting any respect at all because they’ve been programmed by tribal evolution to hate people who look different from themselves and they’ve been programmed to hate powerful women (hence the centuries of witch hunts). As a result of said programming, both commenters have been on a decade long jihad against me and my Oprah theory, and have diagnosed me with every mental (and sometimes physical) impairment imaginable.
My grandmother married a wealthy man. But she invested his money to give to the kids later. My mom watched Gilligan’s Island which had the millionaire and his wife (see the theme song) so she was the last of the five kids but she had autism or something. So Grandma made sure she got special treatment.
Grandma died in 2005 a millionaire but born in 1917 which means the money was self made by her.
Grandma had high conscientiousness.
what do you think pumpkin?
life time net worth stats on my grandmother?
my mom has the picture of Grandma’s Great grandmother from the 1800s
i have the deed to my grandmothers mother’s grave site in Albuquerque
I’m a bit confused. You said she married a wealthy man but then you also said she was a self-made millionaire. I know in the year 2000 only 4% of households were worth at least a million dollars
^^^PEEPEE IS CONFUSED BY HER OWN PERSONALITIES. SAD.^^^
Wealth is not calculated the same given people during the great depression considered money in different relative terms.
I think they had 10 thousand at first but turned it into a million in 63 years.
My grandfather was a Gleason and my grandmother had no money herself when married. He was born in 1903
That is why I am asking about what we can say about life time income. 83 years old, raising 5 kids who each got 100,000+ and she still has many properties not yet sold.
You said a millionaire in 2020 is IQ 118 – I am about 120 but I am not sure how much I’ll have when 83 yo
I spent many years helping my family. My mom is giving my sister her house because she has two kids. I might try to make money in some way. After I settle some last issues at my house.
yall are sum retardes parrots stop stealing things from others n be original 4 once yall have value!
you guys dont understand irony if it hit you like a brick across your fucking skull
imbeciles!
mug,
you are a math guy right
and pp say you are ten point higher in IQ than me
can you explain why SAT is best IQ test to me in your view
2006 SAT 1470 makes me IQ 135 on a Gaussian curve (147 in IQ is 1600 because 939 is about the number of people who scored that high in 2006) But mine is lower on because I got 19 composite on the ACT – the bivariate together is 121 IQ
maybe I had a bad or good day each test but I was in school and not on social security because of my disassociation. (I lived in a trailer park so much of school my mom never helped me)
how do the ACT and SAT sample school skills in the population total to show kids with high scores have high iq (I don’t trust the WAIS anymore, the new one is so different it could invalidate fourth addition)
I might not have da same iqs as you idiot but the one thing that separates me from all ur retarded asses is this…
I take intellectual risks!
you motherfuckers are fucking intellectual cowards almost as much as yall think blacks are pussies or whatever!
racist queers with no contributions 2 humanity despite using a blog n shit
real retarded backwards faggots on this blog queer folk man
im better than all yall eat my entire dick in one attempt faggots!
US budget is the most corruption infested dumpster fire of all western countries. I include even the UK under Tory government.
Neoliberalism is basically corruption masquerading as an ideology,.
Yeah I was thinking about Unz. Maybe Mugabe could be right. That hes ‘coralling’ the predators into a pen for oversight.
But the test of whether this is true is if he has editorial control over what they write and and what topics they can say. i don’t see much pro israel stuff on that site.
It is weird how the number 1 alt right site is run by a jew. I mean thats kind of 1 in a million.
It is weird how the number 1 alt right site is run by a jew. I mean thats kind of 1 in a million.
Makes perfect sense. Just as Lincoln was the white savior to the blacks, Unz may see himself as the Jewish savior to the Christians
you’re neurotic idiot
you guys are all fucking cocksuckers n you guys protect each other more than a jew would 4 another jew
you guys are like a cartel of dunning kruger retards
its me against all you fucking queers
stay triggered faggot retards
no mercy 4 your ignorant asses
I stay on your necks honkies like im Derek chauvin n y’all faggots George floyds
Intellectual pussies!
STILL WAITING!
“see. jews have big heads n shit. and her last name is jewish.” — peepee
Janine Rubenstein does NOT have a big head and neither do jews.
“but muh correlation n shit.” — peepee
small head + giant ape face + yuge hair = sad.
They’re not normal wigs you cretin. They’re more like weaves that blend your hair into the wig.
“For the over-the-top Diana Ross-inspired look, Mangrum curled pieces at the front of my hair that would be exposed and left the rest wrapped and pinned. I’d expected the second wig to be a lot heavier given how long and full it was, but it was surprisingly light. Mangrum teased the wig and merged the front of my hair into the wig’s tendrils.”
small head + giant ape face + yuge hair = sad.
severe autism + profound racism + thinning hair = sad
INDEED!
I was excited to learn Oprah and I have the same size head!
I was excited to learn Oprah and I have the same size head!
I was excited to learn Oprah and I have the same size head!
I was excited to learn Oprah and I have the same size head!
I was excited to learn Oprah and I have the same size head!
I was excited to learn Oprah and I have the same size head!
I was excited to learn Oprah and I have the same size head!
I was excited to learn Oprah and I have the same size head!
I was excited to learn Oprah and I have the same size head!
I was excited to learn Oprah and I have the same size head!
I was excited to learn Oprah and I have the same size head!
I was excited to learn Oprah and I have the same size head!
I was excited to learn Oprah and I have the same size head!
I was excited to learn Oprah and I have the same size head!
I was excited to learn Oprah and I have the same size head!
I was excited to learn Oprah and I have the same size head!
They didn’t measure the head size or they would have mentioned the number. No wig will seem too big on top of that afro.
Obviously what Israel is doing in Palestine is bad, too far and etc etc. Even the pro-Israel people know it and say “there’s no other choice”.
Despite that though, I can’t really see myself supporting Palestine. These guys are insanely low IQ. 70+ years and still no influence, no sway, nothing.
Also, tbh nobody really should be too up in arms about things. Like you would like Israeli society much more than Palestinian society. Same for any other Arab place. that entire region is the hotbed of terror.
Still completely against Jewish influence in politics but yeah, that’s that.
In fairness, you would seem insanely low IQ too if you were raised from birth in a town that was constantly being bombed back to the stone age. How could any people reach their potential in that environment? And in fact, the very act of bombing people lowers even their genetic IQ because it selects for r strategists (since the only way to pass on genes when death becomes random is to breed prolifically & have fast generation times). Also the high IQ ones realize the situation is hopeless and eventually exit, leaving the low IQ ones behind
Also, the fact that someone would even say, “I can’t really see myself supporting Palestine. These guys are insanely low IQ. ” is actually insane.
tbh PP chan they are objectively lower IQ, I don’t know how it’s possible to deny that. It’s also why in one of your earlier posts I said that the 90 IQ average for Arabs as a whole is too high.
but leaving that aside…..these guys are Islamists and quite problematic as a people
I don’t support em because they’re into radical, Islamist stuff and a problem.
Anyways Oprah is the establishment
Nope, she’s the LEAST establishment. Elected the man who gave us Iran nuclear deal & was loudest voice against BOTH Afghanistan & Iraq wars:
Guys theres a serious possibility Kamala Harris runs in 2028 again from what I can tell….
We could end up with a 9 member republican supreme court by 2030.
“We”
Who is “we” here, American LARPer? You’re Irish. You’re the Irish Ian Miles Cheong.
The american supreme court effects everybody dumbass.
Affects*
I woudl honeslty watch a comedy show with Pete Buttigieg as the president. It would be hilarious.
Did anyone see the recent exchange between Elon, Pete Buttigieg, and DTJ?
DTJ was just spouting ignorant lies as usual, Pete corrects him, and then Elon steps him and makes him provide a “counter argument.” Poor Perte had to sit there write this long rebuttal that no one even read. Meanwhile the misinformation gets the most engagement.
Elon is supposed to be this arbitrator of free thought and he doesn’t even understand the burden of proof.
He’s a low-IQ autist masquerading as Tony Stark.
But this doesn’t piss anyone else off, right? No, it’s all Jews and Neoliberals.
Fucking retarded.
Economic theory is obviously not always right when it tries to model human intention and behavior.
I saw someone say,
“Undocumented migrants are generally low paid worker, which means that they each provide relatively less aggregate demand than the average person. However, people are paid according to their marginal product. These workers are low paid because they each provide relatively less aggregate supply than the average person.”
This is obviously wrong. The whole point of hiring illegal immigrants is to get the same amount of production that you would from hiring a natural citizen while paying less for their labor.
Otherwise, companies wouldn’t do it. Moreover, the fact that they are paid so little means their aggregate demand as a population is small.
It depends on whose doing the measuring and what they’re actually measuring. If you have to keep changing your society to make illegal or legal immigrants fit into it (if you have to gear all of your public or corporations towards a dumber, less trusting populace, for example), there are hidden costs.
If all you do is measure a very specific output, then a large factory is worth more than most humans because it produces more of X good like a screw than a single human could without using advanced machines or assembly lines. But you are disregarding all the other random upkeep, creation, operation, management, and the fact that the factory only exists to satisfy humans.
Anyway, it’s a bit strange to measure people this way anyway. It’s kind of a like an argument for slavery or HBD.
Melos comment doesnt even make sense from a verbal perspective.
I’ve noticed the far left and HBDers are starting to form their own little Venn diagram when it comes to the antisemitic conspiracy theories. I heard someone say that Trump won because he was the most Pro-Israel candidate.
So, here’s your chance to provide empirical support for your theories, Pumpkin.
Hypothesis: The most pro-Israel candidates win elections. If two candidates are roughly equal in their support for Israel, then the most socially progressive candidate wins.
Now, this is based on the Idea that the most powerful Jews prioritize Israel before social progressivism.
Its no surprise the 2 blue collar retards here – Melo and RR – are also the only 2 commenters that question whether jewish power exists.
In RRs case, he even questions whether jews exist lol. Hahaha Were talking about people that would score less than 100 on an IQ test.
oprah lies about the size her head. sad.
“trans-big-headed pipo are big-headed pipo and trans-women are women.” — peepee
Use some social IQ. Why would anyone lie about having a big head? It’s not victorian England. Craniometry is considered a joke. If she were gonna lie, she’d like about her IQ of SAT score like you do.
Jesus christ. The problem isnt the head size. Its your dumb theory that head size is related to IQ. That theory was debunked 80 years ago.
Look at the jews. Look at Terry Tao. Look at Elon or Mark Zuckerberg or Bill Gates. None of these people have gigantic heads.
Look at Chris Langan who is way smarter than all those people and has a one in a million cranial capacity. Look at humans who are the smartest animal ever and have the largest brain (for body size) of any animal ever, by a huge margin. Because you’re a black and white all or nothing thinker, you can’t cope with imperfect correlations.
Vos Savant and Einstein had small heads.
You could name the top 20 smartest in history, and 19 would have normal heads.
Vos Savant has a HUGE head. The math part of Einstein’s brain was huge.
^^^CORRECT^^^
but she also has yuge hair. her head is noticeably freakishly yuge. she looks like a telosian.
the interwebs say vos savant is 5’8″. so she’s NOT a midget.
sometimes really short pipo can look like they have yuge heads or yuge penises.
the problem with that theory is
1. i have NEVER lied about my SAT scores.
2. oprah HAS lied about the size of her head.
No she never lied about her head circumference. You just have Asperger’s and are a poor judge of when people are lying. Just like you think I’m lying about being 100% non-black. You suck at reading people & modeling their motives. And why would Gene Siskel lie about her head too? And why would there be a visible seam in THE COLOR PURPLE where they sewed two wigs together? And why would her head be three times bigger than Cynthia Erivo’s?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GdageF4XEAASJ6B?format=png
i was thinking about how low peepee’s IQ is and i laughed.
oprah’s head is not 25+” around. but peepee says oprah has a very long head. oprah does not have a very long head. but even if oprah weren’t lying about her cranial circumference, and she had a very long head, her cranial capacity would be much much less than that of a round headed person with the same circumference.
i estimate oprah’s cranial capacity at 1200 cc.
i estimate elon musk’s at 1800 cc.
sad.
sadly STILL WAITING for peepee to take any IQ test and admit she’s a black lesbian.
Her head is long AND round you dumbass
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GdageF4XEAASJ6B?format=png
If her head were only 1200 cc, then Cynthia Erivo would have to be 400 cc:
sad.
Stop posting picture of Oprah its obscene
PP n her commenters love 2 antagonize n take away from the accomplishments of others
they r real insecure n have a skewed view of whats happening around them
really motivated by coping mechanisms n a failure 2 launch
anyways their awareness of what theyre doing is so low its despicable
STILL WAITING!
gorillas have fucking yuge heads. fitting a human head in your butt is way easier than fitting a gorilla head.
peepee has never corrected her retardations for hair and face and for head shape.
if a helmet doesn’t fit my head it can be because my head is too big or it can be because my head has an unusual shape and helmets are made for usual shaped heads. but how would i know that?
DUH!
look at the so-called biggest head in mlb, bochy, and you will see his head is big but not that big and that it has an unusual shape and he has an ape face.
and obviously oprah would lie about her head size. she had two holocaust liars on her show.
STILL WAITING!
Head shape is very important and the dirty little secret of HBD is black Americans actually have LARGER head circumference that whites, despite having smaller brain size. So a black man with a head circumference as big as Oprah’s would have a cranial capacity of 2010 cc, but a white man with the same head circumference would be 2321 cc and that’s because of racial differences in head shape and perhaps skull thickness.
and obviously oprah would lie about her head size. she had two holocaust liars on her show.
That was for ratings. No ratings in mentioning her huge head. It was just a throwaway comment.
is this why NVDA is now the world’s most valuable co?
sad.
STILL WAITING for the AI bubble to POP!
sad.
parts of it may pop
not all
nvidia had a good magazine in 2009 – monsters vs aliens the movie was in 3D
my math paper I want to show it to the university. I printed it out yesterday when I got ink, one of the social workers knows people there.
and chinapipo in duh house yoh!
phil knight was out previous richest person.
knight: UO —> stanford
huang: OSU —> stanford
but huang is taiwanese chinese. that’s a little different from chinese chinese. because because communist revolution a lot of very smart chinese left the mainland for taiwan.
as i’ve said a bajillion times.
i had two big bosses. they were big. NOT fujianese or native taiwanese. 6’3″ male boss, 5’10” robust female boss.
these were ELITE in the chinese empire who were forced out by the communists.
ELITE MANCHUS AND OTHER NE CHINESE.
they have good programs
but I only saw some of the free stuff online years ago
Zuckerberg and Sam Altman went there
Stanford is considered the number 1 MBA/business school in the world.
The diversity puppet Rishi Sunak went there too.
I would guess the next election they will nominate a corporate robot to be dem candidate. Maybe Nikki Haley. I think eventually it will dawn on ‘the base’ that the dem party was taken over by the Bushies and the Trpublican party is now trump.
And the more left wing party, is trump.
LOL Jeb Bush might run a democrat in 2028.
Campaign Confessions – TYT Hour 2: November 26, 2024
Wow Cenk lost it today on Kamala. I mean, I hate Kamala as well, but I think Cenk really really hates her. 15 mins in.
We both would have voted for Kamala btw.
Strangely, the one theory from 200 years ago – that evolution applies to human beings, puppy doesn’t believe in. Great. All the other theories hes put on his fridge. This big one, nope.
You’re the one who denies evolution. Brain size tripled as we evolved from apes. Denying brain size is linked to intelligence is denying evolution.
Yes, but that theory is relevant when comparing men to apes, not men among each other. What you don’t believe, and I do, is that evolution continued after we invented fire. Thats so embarrassing you dont accept that.
No it works within humans too. East Asians have the highest IQs of any major races and have the biggest brains for body size. Sub-Saharans & Australoids have the lowest IQs and the small brains for body size.
Puppy hasn’t it dawned on you that professional psychometricians would measure head size if it was that robust instead of doing a 40 minute pen and paper test in controlled settings?
You don’t think theyve ever considered an easier way?
Of course IQ tests are way better measures of intelligence then brain size, but it validates IQ to know it’s correlated with brain size because that’s the trait that tripled as we evolved into humans.
God you and Mug are so stupid, but you’re both stupid in completely different ways.
I am fundamentally against the flesh n the mind
I dont believe in a soul I am of the opinion dat we are energy
I am 4 da proper use of energy
Puppy is anti-science, pro religion.
Nope. I’m an atheist
When you corresponded with the late great JP Rushton, did you tell him about your Oprah fetish. because he would have stopped responding if you did.
Look, youre lucky people still take your blog semi seriously after admitting your weird obsession.
That was the first thing I told him. He replied “I would imagine that a lot of these black entertainers, are very intelligent”. He went on to say there would always be some blacks in the top 1% and indeed one would have to be to succeed in a field as competitive as television talk shows. He was extremely articulate off the cuff.
Speaking of Rushton, I had to slap Cochran down for not showing sufficient respect:
https://x.com/PumpkinPerson2/status/1849234358823260220
This is another psychotic break like that time you said you mailed a defunct 1970s tv show and got the producers to apologise for a mistake and hand you merchandise.
Theres zero % chance he said that. Zero.
Theres zero % chance he said that. Zero.
More all or nothing thinking. You think in extremes and absolutes which is also why you blame everything on Jews and think racial IQ differences are so huge.
Splitting, also called binary thinking, black-and-white thinking, all-or-nothing thinking, or thinking in extremes, is the failure in a person’s thinking to bring together the dichotomy of both perceived positive and negative qualities of something into a cohesive, realistic whole. It is a common defense mechanism,[1] wherein the individual tends to think in extremes (e.g., an individual’s actions and motivations are all good or all bad with no middle ground). This kind of dichotomous interpretation is contrasted by an acknowledgement of certain nuances known as “shades of gray”.[2] Splitting can include different contexts, as individuals who use this defense mechanism may “split” representations of their own mind, of their own personality, and of others.[3] Splitting is observed in Cluster B personality disorders such as borderline personality disorder and narcissistic personality disorder,[4][5] as well as schizophrenia and depression.[6][7] In dissociative identity disorder, the term splitting is used to refer to a split in personality alters
Look, once again lack of social intelligence. He was obviously probbly humouring you if he said that. [rest of comment redacted by pp, 2024-11-28]
LOL! It’s your lack of social intelligence because you’re looking at it from your perspective, not from the perspective of a professor who is very interested in brain size and how it relates to race and sex, so of course he was interested in a black female with such a huge brain, especially when she’s the most powerful woman in the World and the richest black. Why wouldn’t someone who specializes in that topic be interested?
The very first thing he said was “where did you get that figure?” and “isn’t that interesting that HER’s should be so big”
But he also said (correctly) that’s there’s a lot more than JUST IQ involved in making money, especially as a talk show host. There’s timing and social intelligence. He mentioned that Bill Clinton would probably make a good talk show host. We also talked about the pygmies and the Watusi and much more.
He ended that first conversation by saying “if you come to Western, drop by”
More psychotic ramblings. But I agree Bill Clinton would make an excellent talk show host.
I don’t. Not witty enough.
So now that Marsha’s made a billion off prostitution, she’s decided to follow her passion and be a writer and she’s in Ireland researching an 800 page biography about you. She’s already talked to some of your childhood teachers and is trying to track down your autistic childhood best friend. Would you be willing to sit with an interview with her? Don’t worry, the book wont mention your real name.
LOL and you think Oprah is witty. Hahaha. [redacted by pp, 2024-11-28]
She’s extremely witty. Better than most stand-up comics:
Shes basically the female Al Sharpon. A complete grifter. She shook down dumbass Kamala for $2.5m even though she already endorsed her at the convention. Thats her MO. She walks into a european jewellery shop and accuses the shop of racism and gets free jewellery. Shes basically a criminal. Extortion is a crime in non-jewish run states.
I bet she even tried to shake down AIPAC. “Give me $500m and I’ll stop being a pain in the ass and endorse the Iraq War”.
$2 million is nothing for such a lavish event. The latest Star Wars movie cost half a billion
No Monique is a shakedown artist. She sued Netflix for racism because they wouldn’t pay her as much as they paid Dave Chapelle and Aimy Shumer. Oprah is smart enough not to pull that crap because your reputation is everything in business and Hollywood is a small town. TRUE psychopaths seldom get truly rich.
Oprah sat in a chair and answered her own questions. There was zero special effects. The crew was 4 people. She shook down Kamala hard. She might even have threatened to endorse trump.
Her team had to build the set, bring lighting, all the hundreds of zoom calls from celebs had to be organized by producers. And she no longer has a regular production staff so all of these people had to be paid for a one time gig which is always more expensive.
Most of these people were doing it for free to help Kamala.
Oprah might have been the first black celeb to get into the extortion racket. So I guess you could say she was ‘intelligent’ to do that.
you don’t need a conspiracy theory to explain how Oprah got so rich. She simply had the biggest audience of any TV talk show in U.S. history so TV stations made billions of advertising dollars off her because in those days people stayed on the same channel all day so one hit show early in the day was the goose that laid the golden egg.
It would be deeply deeply interesting to see who her cofounders/investors were in the OWN.
I bet…
Harvey
No Harvey was not that rich. Powerful, but crappy at business. Didn’t know how to make a deal as Trump would say
Social stupidity^^^
Harvey was obviously rich and the most powerful man in Hollywood. People would even say openly he controlled who won an Oscar.
Most of his movies were successful. I think his brother still actually runs the same company.
Power and money are not the same thing
https://www.forbes.com/sites/natalierobehmed/2015/08/19/why-the-weinsteins-arent-among-hollywoods-richest-power-brokers/
Why do you keep quoting Steve Forbes. The guy is a extreme neoliberal hack. His list is bs.
Weinstein is obviously ultra rich. Hes hiding it.
no he’s not. stop making crap up.
You seriously think the most powerful man in Hollywood – an ash jew – couldnt figure out how to make money? LOL
Not saying he was poor but he wasn’t a billionaire or even close. He and his bro each had $130 million at his peak.
Forbes are literally even less serious journalists than CNN. And thats being kind. Try reading forbes once in a while. Its less rigorous than a comic book.
Look, I work in finance. The best data sources are the Investigative Journalists Union, Piketty and Saez data, Oxfam and Credit Suisse private banking reports.
Unoffically the very best data is privately held by fund administrators, trust companies and private banks. Good look getting them to ever hand over the data.
When JP Morgan died in 1920 or so, people couldn’t believe how poor he died….
Because theyre mentally retarded and couldn’t figure out he was a financial genius who avoided inheritance tax by trusts and offshore even back in the 1920s.
You are either the most gullible person I’ve ever met on econ or you have very severe autism.
Dude, no one’s saying Forbes is the IRS, but they’re the best publicly available census of billionaires the World has ever seen. They might night not know about every hidden trust, shell company or offshore account, but there is a ton of information that can be deduced from media reports, court filings, tax records, industry gossip, anonymous sources, educated guesses about likely investment strategies, or just looking at who is flying by private jet or living in $100 million mansions & when you’ve been tracking the richest people for 40 years, you get a lot of leads & the stuff they don’t know about often just cancels itself out.
Using Forbes to track the richest people in like using the national merit scholarship to track the smartest Americsans or using the Olympics to identify the best athletes. It’s never gonna be perfect. As Mug of Pee says, all models are wrong, but some models are useful.
But because shizophrenia, you’re black and white thinking demands perfection which isn’t even possible anyway. Even one’s personal accountant can’t say for certain how rich one is because an asset is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it and that’s a constantly moving target that’s unknowable until you actually sell it, and no rich person sells everything all at once.
So ridiculous. Steve Forbes has an agenda to keep pushing the free market bs. Hes going to pretend every billionaire in history was self made with no corruption.
You never find it very weird how nobody on the list is rich through corruption or crime or weird legal measures.
If you look at the source of wealth of every single billionaire on the list its an official source that a 10 year old child could figure out. Thats not going to tell you anything about who the richest really are.
At least another 200 billionaires from inheritance and trust funds are missing if you believe Piketty’s equation. And obviously we know the Rockefeller fortune is still gigantic because even the charitable arm of still has tons of money in it, so the trust must have multiples of it.
You dont read anything outside of official sources so telling you about how the world really works is like teaching a kid that people lie to other people sometimes.
Steve Forbes has an agenda to keep pushing the free market bs. Hes going to pretend every billionaire in history was self made with no corruption.
LOL! Your social IQ is so low it’s hilarious. You have no idea what motivates these people.
Reporter: “Mr Forbes, all my reporting shows Anderson Cooper inherited enough money to make our list”
Steve Forbes: “yeah but too much inherited money doesn’t fit my Ayn Rand world view so I had to give that the kibosh”
That conversation never happened. And a third of the people on the list inherited a huge part of their fortunes and the vast majority of self-made ones came from upper class backgrounds. The list has never been more than 1% black and for many years it was only 0.25% black or even zero percent black. The reason there’s not even more inherited wealth is you have the inheritance tax, and then what remains after that is often split among some many heirs that no single one qualifies as a billionaire. And it’s a lot harder for Forbes to know how these heirs quietly invest their money then it is to know about some new tech startup brainiac who is the next big thing.
But the most important reason why the Forbes list is not dominated by old money is that the economy keeps growing, so the newer the fortune, the bigger the fortune, especially in the era of globalization when you have a customer base in the billions.
You never find it very weird how nobody on the list is rich through corruption or crime or weird legal measures.
Elizabeth Holmes was on the cover of Forbes as the World’s youngest self-made female billionaire. A few years later her company was exposed as a fraud and she was in jail. Samuel Bankman-Fried was another Forbes billionaire who went to jail for defrauding investors. Mexican drug trafficker El Chapo made Forbes billionaire list every year from 2009 to 2012.
If you look at the source of wealth of every single billionaire on the list its an official source that a 10 year old child could figure out.
That’s because getting rich usually requires selling to a lot of people which means official public markets.
At least another 200 billionaires from inheritance and trust funds are missing if you believe Piketty’s equation.
No according to Piketty “About 2750 billionaires control 3.5 per cent of the world’s wealth, the Paris-based Global Inequality Lab said in a report”. That’s virtually identical to the 2,755 billionaires Forbes counted the same year
And obviously we know the Rockefeller fortune is still gigantic because even the charitable arm of still has tons of money in it, so the trust must have multiples of it.
Forbes does include them on their list of richest families, but because their $10 billion fortune is divided among some 200 family members, perhaps no single individual qualifies as a billionaire.
You dont read anything outside of official sources so telling you about how the world really works is like teaching a kid that people lie to other people sometimes.
Like that autistic whistle blower who duped you into believing the government is hiding aliens LOL!
Reading your comments about finance and econ kind of reinforces my stereotype about people on the spectrum not being able to understand basic econ.
You had autist spaz machine Bruno a few months ago telling me how great George Bush’s econ adviser Mankiw’s book was…
Look, just read Steve Forbes tweets, his articles or look at his donations. He obviously games the list and does favours to leave some people off the list for tax reasons. Hes not a journalist or a scientist lol. Hes like Larry Kudlow or Stephen Moore, but more deranged and dumber. He makes fox news business look like serious journos. The fact you didnt bother to ever do a background check on Steve Forbes shows why you still watch CNN and read NYT.
<i>But the most important reason why the Forbes list is not dominated by old money is that the economy keeps growing, so the newer the fortune, the bigger the fortune, especially in the era of globalization when you have a customer base in the billions.</i>
Is the economy growing?, inflation adjusted. Because essentially the same corporations have been controlling the same industries for 70 years outside of tech. Has it ever occured to you that globalisation is making people poorer…I want you to think about that question.
Maybe hence why Trudeaus poll numbers are in the 20s? Hahaha. Good old Puppy.
<i> The reason there’s not even more inherited wealth is you have the inheritance tax,</i>
To be fair, you know nothing about finance. I work in the industry. Basically nobody seriously rich pays this tax. JP Morgan avoided it in the 20s before electronic payments and trusts and tax havens btw.
<i> That’s because getting rich usually requires selling to a lot of people which means official public markets.</i>
Again, autism. Many billionaires have privately owned companies. Eg. Koch Brothers. Most billionaires make money not selling to anything e.g. finance/corruption/politics. You just don’t understand how the world actually works and this effects your moral reasoning and your mental model of ‘fairness’ e.g. libertarian views.
<i> You never find it very weird how nobody on the list is rich through corruption or crime or weird legal measures. </i>
I want to emphasise this because….the majority of the list would be politics and corruption if it was a real list. Not 3 really brazen fraudsters you mentioned. In real life and not a Steve Forbes comic book novel fraudsters get away with it by bribing judges and pols like in…the vast majority of third world countries, and under neoliberalism, increasingly in most western countries. e.g Senator Rick Scott.
These other things about marriage and children…
Hahaha.
I want you to consider the possibility that trust fund kids marry….other trust fund kids and not janitors and polling company employees. Consider how that changes your understanding of the rich and how wealth is preserved.
Reading your comments about finance and econ kind of reinforces my stereotype about people on the spectrum not being able to understand basic econ.
Which explains why you don’t understand it
Look, just read Steve Forbes tweets, his articles or look at his donations. He obviously games the list and does favours to leave some people off the list for tax reasons.
Dude, your conspiracy theories are always wrong. You said RR was being paid to comment here. WRONG. You said Melo was being paid to comment here. WRONG. You said both of them were working for Israel. WRONG. You thought the government was hiding aliens. WRONG.
Hes not a journalist or a scientist lol. Hes like Larry Kudlow or Stephen Moore, but more deranged and dumber
He doesn’t write the list, he delegates to a team of a reporters
.
Is the economy growing?, inflation adjusted.
Of course it is! In the early 1980s you only needed $2 billion to be the richest American. Inflation adjusted that’s $6.3 billion. Today you need over $300 billion. There are companies that are worth over a trillion dollars now. Technology and advances in living standards has made the average humans orders of magnitude more productive than they were in Rockefeller’s day and you have billions more people watching adds on YouTube, causing media value to skyrocket.
Because essentially the same corporations have been controlling the same industries for 70 years outside of tech.
But they can reach more customers thanks to tech. In the old days you could only sell coke to the 40 million Americans watching the Cosby show on Thursday night. Today even the poorest villages in Africa are watching YouTube on their smart phones so the market is now almost 6 billion people.
Has it ever occured to you that globalisation is making people poorer…I want you to think about that question.
It’s making the median person in rich countries poorer but it’s making the rich much, much richer.
Maybe hence why Trudeaus poll numbers are in the 20s?
The Trudeau who was brave enough to allow for Bibi’s arrest while Trump vows to deport hos critics. That Trudeau?
To be fair, you know nothing about finance. I work in the industry. Basically nobody seriously rich pays this tax.
Michael Jackson’s estate did, though the IRS unsuccessfully sued them for undervaluing his assets. But yeah, Forbes probably assumes everyone pays their taxes so they may underestimate a lot of wealth. On the other hand, they usually have no idea how much debt many rich people have, so it cancels out in many cases.
That’s because getting rich usually requires selling to a lot of people which means official public markets.
Again, autism. Many billionaires have privately owned companies. Eg. Koch Brothers.
Dude, they made their money selling gasoline, it doesn’t get any more mass market than that. The fact that their company was private does not mean their product wasn’t sold to the public.
Most billionaires make money not selling to anything e.g. finance/corruption/politics. You just don’t understand how the world actually works and this effects your moral reasoning and your mental model of ‘fairness’ e.g. libertarian views.
No you don’t understand how the World works. The unfairness is not hiding in the shadows, it’s the billionaires who are operating in plain sight. As Michael Kinsley noted, the scandal is not all the people breaking the law, the scandal is what’s legal. You’re dissing the Forbes list because there’s not enough corrupt people because you’re too autistic to know, half the people on the list ARE corrupt, they’re just smart about it.
If you were in charges of Forbes, you’d flood the list with old money WASPS and bribed members of Congress, and then you’d scratch your head wondering why all the zionists you’d kick off the list have so much power.
I want you to consider the possibility that trust fund kids marry….other trust fund kids and not janitors and polling company employees. Consider how that changes your understanding of the rich and how wealth is preserved.
It doesn’t matter if you and your wife had two of the richest dads in America. If they died in the 1980s, the most you two would inherit would be maybe $3 billion. That would make you the richest couple in America in the early 1980s, but the booming tech economy of the next 40 years would produce people worth tens of billions and eventually hundreds of billions, leaving you in the dust.
You naively assume you could just do some magical corruption that would turn $3 billion into $300 billion. You don’t understand that the money is not liquid because it’s a company you own, not cash in an account, and if you try to sell it all at once, the value would crash, and even if you got full value, the last place old money would invest is Facebook, Amazon or Tesla.
Even Elon Musk’s kids probably wont make the Forbes 400 in 40 years, because his wealth will be split 12 ways and they’ll be eclipsed by the World’s first trillionaires selling the fountain of youth or genetically enhanced super babies.
Ok….
Your general IQ must be worse than RRs based on these comments. I didn’t realise how bad you were at understanding simple economic concepts. Lets go 1 by 1.
“On the other hand, they usually have no idea how much debt many rich people have, so it cancels out in many cases.”
Can you do me a favour? Stop using statistical theory to talk about non statistics subjects like biology or finance. Thank you. Because its not reality. Thank you. You are dumb. Thank you.
“Dude, they made their money selling gasoline, it doesn’t get any more mass market than that. The fact that their company was private does not mean their product wasn’t sold to the public.”
Even RR isn’t as dumb as this. Wow. If its a privately held company it means their accounts (and therefore the real value of the company) are….private….wow. Even RR wouldn’t say this.
“No you don’t understand how the World works. The unfairness is not hiding in the shadows, it’s the billionaires who are operating in plain sight.”
?? 90% of corruption and political rent seeking is hidden. Otherwise people would stop it? Otherwise even other plutocrats might stop it? Hahaha. Wow.
“It doesn’t matter if you and your wife had two of the richest dads in America. If they died in the 1980s, the most you two would inherit would be maybe $3 billion. That would make you the richest couple in America in the early 1980s, but the booming tech economy of the next 40 years would produce people worth tens of billions and eventually hundreds of billions, leaving you in the dust.”
Puppy I’m going to explain something to you about the economy that might blow your mind. But the vast majority of billionaires aren’t from tech. Not even on the propaganda list Steve Forbes made. Steve Forbes himself, is not from tech.
I also think you might not even understand the basic concept of compound interest which is thought in junior high and which you don’t seem to understand. Even if you were the most risk averse investor in the world in the 80s, it would be pretty easy to triple or quadruple it just sitting on your ass. You could pick and extreme low vol asset like property or bonds and you could still x4 your money.
Also the fact you said Elon’s heirs wont be on the real richest list in 40 years makes you retarded. David Rockefeller controlled the entire USA for 40 years almost 50 years after his dad died…you think he didn’t have money. Or do you believe his buddy Steve Forbes when he assured you it was all lost to Big Gubment? Youre not sophisticated enough to talk about even your own domain – politics.
Look. I don’t want to keep banging on about it, but your view of the world is the view of someone who has parts of the normal human mind missing.
Many people comapre aspies to kids in both behaviour and their interpretation…
Even RR isn’t as dumb as this. Wow. If its a privately held company it means their accounts (and therefore the real value of the company) are….private….wow.
I agree RR’s not as dumb as you. By talking to industry experts, Forbes can make educated guesses about their revenue or profit and compare these with the price-to-sales, price-to-earnings or comparable ratios of analogous publicly traded companies. Their analysis will never be perfect, but then short of taking the company public, there is no perfect way to know its market value.
?? 90% of corruption and political rent seeking is hidden. Otherwise people would stop it? Otherwise even other plutocrats might stop it?
Forbes simply estimates the total value of one’s assets and subtracts debt. Whether the were acquired corruptly or innocently is a separate question. I don’t doubt that some criminal fortunes are missing, but I also think some criminals have laundered their money into respectable industries and lied about their origin story.
Puppy I’m going to explain something to you about the economy that might blow your mind. But the vast majority of billionaires aren’t from tech.
But the vast majority of centibillionaires are. You’re just jealous that the computer nerds are taking over while you languish showerless for months in your parents basement, calling them autistic.
I also think you might not even understand the basic concept of compound interest which is thought in junior high and which you don’t seem to understand. Even if you were the most risk averse investor in the world in the 80s, it would be pretty easy to triple or quadruple it just sitting on your ass. You could pick and extreme low vol asset like property or bonds and you could still x4 your money.
Quadrupling your money is not enough when the fortune is divided by 4 because you’re one of 4 heirs. And putting all the money in bonds requires first you liquidate which lowers its value & destroys the family’s controlling share of the company their patriarch started. It’s said that Trump could have been just as rich had he simply invested his inheritance in the S&P 500, but few make that choice and that’s much riskier than what you’re describing.
David Rockefeller controlled the entire USA for 40 years almost 50 years after his dad died…you think he didn’t have money. Or do you believe his buddy Steve Forbes when he assured you it was all lost to Big Gubment?
The grandson of John D. Rockefeller appeared on the 400 richest Americans list as recently as 2016 and the international billionaire list as recently as 2017 so I don’t know what you’re bitching about. I think you just have a visceral hatred of socially awkward math nerds and it disgusts you that they’ve been topping the Forbes list for the past few decades, partly because you naively equate money with power.
I don’t want to keep banging on about it, but your view of the world is the view of someone who has parts of the normal human mind missing.
Many people comapre aspies to kids in both behaviour and their interpretation…
So if we accept your diagnosis, then it means you keep losing debates to a man-child with half his mind missing. How embarrassing for you.
mug,
If I hurt your feelings in the past I am sorry.
pp,
A big head can be used network wise to pay attention to more things at once, but also the plasticity can make brains more efficient. Faster energy frequency can increase the number of wires inside grey matter.
What made Einstein more intelligent was his glial cells. These cells support neurons with energy, waste disposal and increased capillaries blood flow. The math part of the brain in Einstein was the right parietal lobe was big but it was his energy efficiency that made him smart. Visual spatial requires dense energy use.
Chris Langan I noticed he invented a kind of fourier transform in his CTMU but he is not the top IQ person on the planet. Many computer people also invented his function recall program. It is used in evolvable software. His laungauge as cognition is how LISP the computer laungauge works. Data as code and code as data with recursiveness. All he did was apply it to physics.
Great tweet from Lion
https://x.com/LionBlogosphere/status/1861530240255746201
50% correct. By ‘free market’ he means, ‘mercantilism’ which is the opposite of free market.
trump’s picks…
2 arabs. one turk. one or two brahmin. and ONLY ONE jew!
peepee: but miriam adelson n shit.
mugabe: according to kmac: As of August 14 according to Forbes, of 26 billionaire donors to Trump (not including Musk who donated at least $119 million), 22 are not Jewish
WINNING!?
mugabe assumes trump’s new govt will be totally retarded. but that doesn’t mean lying about it is cool.
i think fuentes and anglin and peepee are way too focused on israel. as far as standard of living of americans goes israel can only have an effect if americans go to war for israel like they did under W.
trump has already said something like “war with iran? ha! america has way too many problems of its own.”
Israel matters in the sense that by sending Bibi weapons when Bibi is behaving badly creates more enemies for the U.S.. The fact that so few of his donors are Zionists makes it even worse because it means he actually believes Bibi’s propaganda and is not just selling out.
He might still be a good President for other reasons (closing the border, eliminating wokeness so people can speak freely about HBD) but he’s the only post-cold war Prresident with the power to take on the Israel lobby so it’s too bad they have him fooled (or maybe he’s blackmailed)
Well we know they couldnt get him to fuck kids so we can rule out that. And theyve already thrown all the dirt on him from 3 previous runs for president and hes basically immune.
But Mugabe’s donors list is not enough evidence trump is free from Zion either.
For starters, his key donor is Miriam Adelson ($300m over 3 election cycles, plus Adelson donated another $200m to republicans in general).
Second, his son in law and his dad are hardcore zionists/neocons.
Third, the deep state might try to trick trump with false info e.g ‘chemical weapons attacks’, ‘iranian assassins’, some sort of false flag attack by a ‘palestinian gunman’ in the US is almost certain at this point.
If you notice, every time Tucker asks trump about the CIA, trump never answers the question because trump knows that if he ever did something pretty wild like a peace deal with Russia or Iran…you could have certain scenarios puppy wont let me write here happening.
peepee: aha. but bruce bochy wasn’t a very good player. and he has been a great manager. https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/bruce-bochy-wins-fourth-world-series-title-with-rangers-ring-cementing-legacy-of-all-time-great-manager/
mugabe: yes. this confirms peepee’s theory.
but is bochy an alcoholic?
peepee: what does that have to do with anything you loser?!
mugabe: OKAY. SAD! are your ready for me to lay down some CHROOF!?
the ALLOMETRIC theory of “alcoholism”.
FACTS:
1. humans do NOT have the largest brain size to body size ratio of MAMMALS.
2. it’s the PIN-TAILED TREE SHREW! (look it up! DO IT!)
3. how much does the PIN-TAILED TREE SHREW drink?
4. one of the totally UN-controversial effects of alcohol on the brain is that it LOWERS the brain’s temperature, it makes the brain cold.
4. PREDICTION: brain size geography is tightly correlated EtOH consumption.
5. western irish pipo drink, russians drink, koreans drink … because it cools their brains.
brain overheating is a problem even in cold climates even with cultural adaptations.
humans do NOT have the largest brain size to body size ratio of MAMMALS.
But we do have the largest ratio of brain size to EXPECTED brain size for our size. Smaller animals are always going to have the largest raw ratio.
I was told I should never drink because I’d become an alcoholic.
I mean that emotional problems make pain go away under alcohol but in doing so people can drink until they get so drunk that nothing matters anymore. They become in a stooper don’t move and loose all cohesion of cognitive function.
I don’t want to be like that.
I understand that drinking is healthy it is only that trauma will make it unhealthy for some.
I don’t take pain killers either because I would become addicted for those reasons also.
4. PREDICTION: brain size geography is tightly correlated (with) EtOH consumption.
CHECK IT OUT!
Dudes desperately trying to justify his alcoholism
STILL WAITING!
NO! you fucking dummkopf!
the physical health effects of EtOH are NOT so simple as the AMA says.
“alcoholism” is a SOCIAL problem much more than it is a “public health” problem.
it is a medical problem only under certain circumstances.
cancer of the mouth and throat and cirrhosis and cardiomyopathy and WK…
all of these “outputs” require inputs in addition to EtOH. and i can’t drink enough to make that happen without throwing up.
GP: alcohol is a carcinogen.
mugabe: acetaldahyde is.
GP: that’s what i meant.
peepee: but the human body only converts EtOH to acetaldahyde in the liver. so why are cancers of the mouth and throat associated with alcohol?
mugabe: good question and the answer is obvious if you think about it. answer: it’s not human cells of the mouth and throat which convert EtOH to the carcinogenic acetaldahyde. it’s bacteria. alcohol in the form of listerine is used to kill bacteria in the mouth. so there should be a hump in the ORs.
STILL WAITING!
I am mostly Irish and Nordic (not certain of Scottish) whereas drinking need distillery so that’s an old technology up there?
My brother knows how to make molasses. He could build a distillery.
keeping warm in the Winter might be an effect of extraversion from alcohol? That is absorption of the environment.
but then it makes sense that in the cold you absorb cold.
look up the ice man guy in Poland who can be in ice bucket two hours and not get sick from eclipse injections.
he controls his core temperature the way Buddhist monk do.
sorry
he is immune to ecoli
koreans drink like horses.
ants have big brains
1/7 the body weight
But humans have aposable thumbs two legs and speak
we sweat also
self regulation of body system,
it helps to be in large groups,
kids have social intelligence.
to move fast and know what to do
figure out the environment with fire
cook
spears
tools in general
all to do with attentional awareness
We go into environments run and talk and breathe many miles a day
use are hands most of all
change the places we go
not specialized like ants are
adaptable
on another note Aeolis blog is so dead its unbelievable
da man only has one talent n dats conning people in2 believing he is resilient when in fact he is just an unstoppable 4ce of constant losing
he is so idiotic he is a diseased mind da autism really did him in
people need 2 disavow Aeoli he is intolerant of human progress
Real weird guy ngl
Joe Rogan justifies marijuana and DMT. Mugabe justifies alcohol. Wall Street guys justify uppers. LGBTQ women justify antidepressants.
I don’t think the ruthless torture to your bacterial biome and immune system, ph levels, liver, brain cells, etc. is worth the temporary cooling of the brain. But maybe it is in a way, like caffeine. Useful at specific times and places but always has a withdrawal. But I assume there is a better alternative that is more attuned with the rest of the body and doesn’t hurt your whole immune system like alcohol.
In certain situations, stimulants make sense. Certain ones.
Serious question – if Oprah was white would you give a fuck about her?
Answer
Happy Turkey Day
I found a website that said sam Altman was 170 but also that the founder of etherium block chain is 257
So it is kind of ridiculous.
I’d say that to create fusion power you need at least and IQ of 175 (Doc Oc spiderman 2004) iron man made it smaller to fit in the chest of his suit.
Dr Benton Quest made a brain computer interface for virtual reality travel. I don’t know how smart he is but close to or above iron man and Batman. Above 180
Spiderman is 160 not 260 – anything above 200 doesn’t match with the mathematics.
My weight is 160 so I pretend maybe, if I had money to experiment scientifically in a lab. I could make things.
That one girl 160 (a true story?) had great working memory. Solved complex problems instantly in her head. Same as Einstein.
I wanted to make a utility belt when 12 but I understood the materials I had were not strong enough. And no tall building existed nearby to use it. In the kids wing of the mental hospital I imagined at 9 years old I could build a robot tiger suit and a helicopter to escape.
You know, Marsha said she was 170
Canonically the joker is 170
My therapist asked if I have bad thoughts like the joker, I never saw the movie but I said yes, all the time.
I am better now but because I processed some of the emotional pain recently.
That’s Bochy, who loves his bourbon and good wine, wondering why virtually every going-away present he received this summer involved alcohol. Let’s see, he got a bottle of 1942 Don Julio tequila from the Marlins. Two bottles of Sagamore Spirit Rye whiskey in Baltimore. Bottles of bourbon from Red Sox manager Alex Cora and Nationals GM Mike Rizzo. Custom wine from the Padres.
“Is everyone trying to tell me something?” Bochy says. “Come on now.”
STILL WAITING!
vos savant has a big head for a woman. maybe. i suspect she has deliberately styled her hair to make her head look bigger. and she has put on pale face. she’s not naturally that pale. but supposedly she is a relative of einstein’s hero ernst mach.
letterman’s head is larger. OBVIOUSLY!
My friend said he once did stupid human tricks for a show once but I never knew what he meant until now.
^^^INCORRECT^^^
you can see here that her head is not especially big but it has an unusual shape.
Marilyn had a web forum I was on.
I said: God exists because rainbows
under my avatar was the classification intellectual
my mom’s sister is named Marilyn
if she is 5’8″ she is “petite” woman. so her head looks bigger.
I am a 5’7″ male
took growth hormones as a kid
although she says “i have no one to turn to.”
very insightful.
and true.
and not just true of ordinary relationships.
mugabe thinks that so far as psycholigists and psychiatrists help anyone…they can only help people who are dumber than they are…or at most just a little smarter than they are…if you’re a lot smarter than them, they can’t help you.
My doctor and therapist seems very smart.
but my neighbor who was a nurse told me no cure for OCD exists so maybe that is why she doesn’t talking to me about it on the meds(?)
Agreed. If they try to give holistic advice about how to live life, they are going to be wrong if you are as intelligent or more intelligent than them.
However, if they offer specific solutions to specific problems that they happen to know more about, or state facts that might be utilized by you to improve your own overall view (“meditation can reduce stress and increase empathy” vs. “You should meditate for 30 minutes every day because you are stressed “), then it can be helpful.
But I’ve read the most intelligent people are best at making deals with others where everyone wins. Obviously, stupid people make trades/deals with people where they are the obvious winner. This makes sense, they have less ability to consider either a variety of possible solutions or to consider all the variables in whatever it takes to fulfill their desire. So that should be true for psychiatrists as well.
like spelling “psychologist” correctly.
it’s editing.
Im still sad about my dog.
She had to leave but she still looked like a puppy. She might feel like I abandoned her.
–
My psychiatrist is going to teach the university but that’s nothing to do with my pet dog.
also i think she’s LYING about where her money is from.
what i’ve read is her family became the george jeffersons of st louis. they owned a chain of dry cleaners.