Cro-magnons were the first truly human Europeans and have long been romanticized as the first truly modern humans, in part because of a Euro-centric bias, but also because they’re the people most associated with the Upper Paleolithic revolution and the replacement of the Neanderthals who had held our ancestors captive in Africa for hundreds of thousands of years.
They had wonderful lives, wandering through the forests of Europe as the seasons changed from summer to snowy winters, sleeping under the stars, exploring a vast uncharted terrain with a child-like awe of the unknown and rich mythology to explain it, vastly out-competing their only rivals the Neanderthals for food and shelter, and hunting so much mega fauna that they reached their full genetic potential for height and brain size, unlike the stunted malnourished people who would follow them once agriculture was invented. These were some of the happiest people to have ever lived and they did so in a true Garden of Eden, before tempted by the metaphoric apple into the “sin” that was agriculture. A “sin” we would pay dearly for.
But how intelligent were they? This is a tricky question because based on brain size, they appear a bit more intelligent than Europeans today, but based on polygenic education scores, they appear substantially less intelligent.
Brain size suggests Cro-Magnons had an IQ of 104
Over the 20th century, brain size, IQ and height in the developed World has increased thanks to advances in nutrition and reduction in disease allowing us to recover the genetic potential not realized since the Upper Paleolithic, before agriculture had stunted us (Lynn, 1990). Despite brain size in 21st century America reaching an impressive 1418 cm3, (Pumpkin Person, 2018) it’s still less than it was 40,000 years ago, when brain size peaked (mostly in Europe) at about 1487 cm3 (after correcting for preservation bias). So it seems the remaining 69 cm3, shortfall (0.76 SD) is a genetic loss.
But why did genetic potential for brain size decrease 0.76 SD? Perhaps in part because genetic height in Europe decreased 0.5 SD (Piffer & Kirkegaard, 2024) and polygenic height scores correlate 0.64 with height, and height correlates 0.4 with cranial capacity (Rushton, 1992), then this fact alone might explain (0.5 SD)(0.64)(0.4) = 0.13 SD of the brain size decrease, leaving 0.63 SD (57 cm3) not explained.
Perhaps the remaining shrinkage can be explained by a genetic drop in muscle mass that paralleled the drop in genetic height, but until ancient DNA studies explore SNPs associated with lean body mass, this remains speculation.
Given the 0.4 correlation between IQ and brain size (Jensen 1998)(Gignac & Bates, 2017), this would predict an IQ loss 0.4(0.63 SD) = 0.25 SD or 4 IQ points since the Upper Paleolithic, suggesting Cro-Magnon would have scored an impressive IQ 104 if raised in today’s America!
Genetic education predicts Cro-Magnon had an IQ of 89
Although brain size may have decreased in Europe by as much as 0.63 SD (after adjusting for body size), polygenic education scores (EA3 PGS) seem to have increased from what looks like -1.63 in Upper Paleolithic Europe type areas, to what looks like about -0.2 in Medieval England to about +0.2 in contemporary England (Piffer & Kirkegaard, 2024) for a total increase of about 1.83 SD since the Upper Paleolithic. Given a correlation of 0.4 between IQ and polygenic education scores (Pumpkin Person, 2024), this suggests a gain of 0.4(1.83 SD) = 0.73 SD since the Upper Paleolithic (11 IQ points), suggesting Cro-Magnon would have scored IQ 89 if raised in today’s America.
Indeed when I recently asked Peter Frost what their IQs would be if reared in today’s America, he guessed “high 80s”:
Combining brain size with genetic education predicts Cro-Magon had an IQ of 93
If brain size predicts Cro-Magnons have an IQ of 104 (if raised in today’s America) and genetic education level predicts an IQ of 89, and there’s no a priori reason to think one prediction is more valid than the other, then the only reasonable solution is to predict their IQs based on both variables.
The multiple regression equation predicting IQ from brain size and genetic education is:
Phenotypic IQ gap = 0.37(phenotypic brain size gap) + 0.37(genetic education gap) (Pumpkin Person, 2024).
When this formula was tested on the 15 point black-white IQ gap, it accounted for an incredible 13 of the 15 points! (Pumpkin Person, 2024).
Now applying it on the gap between today’s U.S. whites and Cro-Magnon man:
Phenotypic IQ gap = 0.37(+0.63 SD) + 0.37(-1.83 SD)
Phenotypic IQ gap = +0.23 SD – 0.68 SD
Phenotypic IQ gap = -0.45 SD
0.45 SD = 7 IQ points and is equivalent in SD units to a one inch increase in within sex height over 40,000 years. Kind of trivial. On a scale where today’s U.S. whites scores 100, Cro-Magnon would have scored IQ 93, consistent with the sophistication of their drawings; when I objectively scored these on the draw-a-man IQ test, they clocked in at IQ 90, though the sample size was tiny (n = 2).
Although some evidence suggests adaptive evolution increased ten thousand percent in the last 40,000 years (Hawks et al, 2007). Europe only gaining 7 IQ points in 40,000 years suggests evolution more or less ended in the stone age, consistent with the punctuated equilibrium model. This is consistent with the emergence of brain genes peaking 55,000 years ago (Libedinsky et al, 2023).
Richard Klein states:
What happened 40,000 or 50,000 years ago was the last major change in the genotype. At least the last major biological change. Evolution continues, but the evolution that’s involved in making us capable of wielding this vast variety of cultures–that probably stopped around 40,000 or 50,000 years ago and there’s been no essential change since.
Stephen Jay Gould agreed , famously stating:
There has been no biological change in humans in 40,000 or 50,000 years. Everything we call culture and civilization we’ve built with the same body and brain.
Pumpkin Person 
Biden was worse off than I thought. He did good during his most recent SOTU. He only had a couple gaffs, and didn’t have that nursing home stare he did during last night’s debate. These changes must be recent. He won the debate because he’s the only one that had coherent policy responses to the questions. That doesn’t matter though. MSM will only tout his failures. Moreover, Americans would rather have someone strong and stupid than someone weak and smart.
I would still vote for Biden’s dead corpse before Trump or anyone else, and most democrats feel the same. However, I’m not the person Biden has to win over for the election. He needs the low-IQ independents who vote base don vibes.
The most recent poll showed that Kamala is the favored successor. Followed by Newsom and I don’t think either can beat Trump. they have to go with a non-progressive, left-wing candidate. The working class is too dumb to understand things like intersectionality and gender science, so having that as your platform is fucking retarded.
Lol, Melo doesn’t get anything. All he can do is troll but pretend he’s better than everyone else.
I am better than everyone else, though.
I’ve said it here in the comments that Biden had dementia for 2 years minimum.
Hilary has parkinsons I think.
Trump had ADD.
Netanyahu is a clinical psychopath.
Do you know anything about politics or are you a NYT reader? The last sentence you wrote suggests low/medium IQ NYT reader.
<i>The working class is too dumb to understand things like intersectionality and gender science</i>
…
that islamophobe retard (((sam harris))) said something like:
sorry i can’t remember…
like that word brett weinstein faked being unable to remember TWICE.
i mentioned this in his youtube comments AND he responded in what i took as a threat. seriously. it was creepy. in bret weinstein’s word was “excited delirium”. two words graphically. one word semantically.
the problem is SUBTLETY.
there are many reasons to be anti some interpretations of islam and anti some muslims.
AND
there are many reasons to be anti ROMAN.
both islam and the roman church are TOTAL ideologies. they have a politics TOO. and they’re GLOBAL.
so when catholics or muslims say “shut up you anti-catholic islamophobe!”
THEY’RE LYING!
was it unz or here? or both?
i said:
(orthodox) judaism is superior to christianity and other religions in its this-world-li-ness. it’s like a how-to manual for life.
BUT!
judaism is CONSPICUOUSLY not cool when it comes to mysticism.
what is called “jewish mysticism” is NOT mysticism.
the sufis, vedantists, taoists, some schools of buddhism, so many christian mystics, HEIDEGGER, etc….
they make judaism and jews look DUMB.
cue pill personality explaining why jews suck at mysticism despite being the master race.
it’s just sad.
Having too many directives and OCD rituals is bad. Its basically writing false idol worship into your religion. The good part about rituals and directions like washing one’s hands is that they can either be useful habits in our physical world, or can continuously redirect you towards the metaphysical through our physical bodies (like praying or going to church, which doesn’t really make sense until you realize it is a way to more completely align your mind and society with your spiritual eternal self, which is easier to forget if you have no ritual).
The other good part about having many “metaphorical” stories or complicated doctrine is if it somehow points at/explains eternal truths and our actual metaphysical reality, as well as the nature of God, in as much detail as possible, and hopefully without baking in false beliefs like 6000-year old earths or a specific Holy Land.
when jfk was running for president pipo would say (supposedly) “he’ll just take orders from the pope.”
and this was labeled “anti-catholic bigotry”.
but IN REALITY the roman church is a TOTAL IDEOLOGY.
FACT!
Mugabe denies jews are smarter than gentiles…what a dumbass.
Its at least 80 or 90% genetic (jews and gentiles have similar environments).
And the reason jews are successful is 50% IQ, 50% dark triad.
I’ve been studying jews for 5 years and I’ve read a lot about their history. The evidence is gigantic that its genetic and it at least goes back to the 1700s (beyond this, my personal belief is that jews were legally and socially suppressed and therefore couldn’t ‘achieve’ so its hard to know when the IQ gap began to open up ).
Jews are the only people I’ve ever read about that got rich from spread betting and retail gambling. Its basically unheard of for someone to become a billionaire going to a bookies. East Asians can’t do even though they have quant IQ, because to be a gambler on real world or sporting events you also need social IQ or qualitative analysis.
Youre going to talk now about Bruno and these other Rain Man people counting cards in casinos…I mean spread betting and gambling real life events. Not counting, or number sequencing.
The only time I’ve seen gentiles compete with jews in hedge funds is in pure quant strategies (i.e. programming a computer to look for patterns) or using insider info like John Paulson did.
Buffet learned investing from a jew too. He says it many times to his official biographer.
Most of the really major scientific and philosophical advances couldn’t have happened without jews. Have you ever read even a mainstream history book.
We need to just take Marsha’s view on this and accept it and move on and figure out what this means for the rest of us in the vast majority. I don’t worship jews at all. I just accept it like I accept gravity or your dumb religion being a stupid scam.
Most of the really major scientific and philosophical advances couldn’t have happened without jews.
Wow! The mask is finally off.
As Jimmy would have said, Phil is too impressed by credentials and paperwork.
Salk elbowing his way to the front of the team that discovered the polio vaccine =! polio would still exist without Jews.
phil you are so brainwashed it’s painful. look at Murray’s list of Human Accomplishment. Jews barely make the list. Look at Faraday – self taught and foundational to physics and science – no jewish piece of paper needed
Oh and youre dumb religion was given to you by….you know who.
I find the jewish IQ thing, basically to me thats like accepting thermodynamics, supply and demand, genetics. Its just not even worth debating.
Whats more fun to me…hehehe….is debating whether gorillas are as smart as most africans…hehehe. Chris Langan finds it amusing too hahaha.
Pill worships the privileged race and pisses all over less privileged people. This indicates low IQ, dark triad, and severe autism.
Another interesting IQ debate question – whats the gap in IQ between gentile whites and east asians?
I think thats a topic you can go back and forth on a small bit.
My general understanding, and I think Puppy would agree, is that east asians are somewhat smarter but mainly in quant/spatial to a kind of lopsided degree.
If social IQ where testable and not a hidden variable, the composite intelligence would be similar.
If you factor in creativity or ‘entreprenurship IQ’ or musical intelligence or other forms of intelligence, whites probably come out ahead.
So mugabe can rest easy now. He can suck on his thumb and go back to sleep.
East Asians are genetically superior to Jews. But you’re a natural born slave so you’ll continue to worship your Jewish masters.
^^^Horrible VIQ. I am the OPPOSITE to worshipping jews. Thank you.
OMG you TOTALLY worship Jews. Even ethnocentric Jews themselves like Lion don’t praise Jews as much as you do.
Asian Americans are a selected population.
When Mugabe said a nigerian guy in his office was a legit actuary I burst out laughing reading the comment. So gullible.
Mugabe has been basically a hardcore NAACP supporter since I’ve been here. Always promoting black ‘hidden’ genius and very very reluctant to criticise these people. Like Puppy, he takes his morality from jewish mind control.
The fact is there is no such thing as a black actuary. There is literally no pure 100% black person capable of being a NASA scientist in theoretical science in all of Africa.
In the entire country of Nigeria maybe 1% of the population would understand basic calculus.
Mugabe has some sort of frankly weird obsession with blacks.
Do you want me to copy and paste what Middle eastern people or Chinese people think of africans guys? Its not hard to find.
Like Puppy, he takes his morality from jewish mind control.
So not only did Jews give us modern science but they invented morality now too? Is there no end to your slavish worship? OMG so embarrassing.
there was a black american actuary in my office when i worked in LA too. and he was just as credentialed as my taiwanese boss.
high IQ blacks may actually gravitate toward the occupation as passing the tests is all that’s required.
The western media covers up what happens in Africa. I know. I’ve seen the stories of aid workers and teachers and nurses and people that go there.
Because jews control white peoples minds, nobody knows what a dumpster fire is going on down there. It is literally the moist horrific place on planet earth.
Indians may be as poor but they’re civilised. Even without water or electricity, they’re civilised.
Blacks….
Langan is 100% correct gorrillas are roughly equal in IQ to blacks.
Dear God you’re an idiot.
Take a ticket to africa and go to non security protected places. Walk down the street. See what happens.
You’re human garbage
When Puppy wants to call me a racist. He should educate himself on what happens in Africa or other black dominant places (eg. Caribbean, the ghetto, the favelas in Brazil).
Animals don’t even act like it.
The idea of black actuary is like the idea of a dumb jew.
OMG there are MILLIONS of dumb Jews. Go to Israel. Go to Staten Island. You just can’t see it because you have SEVERE autism and have been brainwashed to worship the privileged ethnic group.
Basically no such thing as working class or dumb jew truth be told.
Puppy asked me to promise to “stop being racist”.
Maybe I should ask puppy to promise me to “stop being ignorant” and google more about cannibalism, baby rape, AIDS, abandoning your kids, beating up old people for fun etc etc.
The next day, after Puppy finally educates himself. Puppy will never ban me again.
Yes keep pissing all over the poor and disenfranchised like a good little slave. So pathetic. Next Pill will be going to Israel and signing bombs.
“Disenfranchised”? Youre the person that hates left wing economics, except in the sole exception of helping blacks. Youre brainwashed.
No you’re the person who hates left wing economics except for white people.
You are so incoherent and and deranged. Exactly socialism is for your own citizens. Not other countries citizens. Idiot.
Socialism for me but not for thee! You’re just scum.
Unban these comments and debate properly. THe east asian comment had nothign wrong with it.
Last Comment To RaceRealist:
You cannot accept that differences exist.
You must believe intelligence is the same in everyone.
Therefore all intelligence is environmental.
Because all intelligence is all environmental, no genes no matter how different in the genome can make people more or less intelligent. No matter if these genes are used in making proteins or just in regulating the metabolism can people differ in intelligence.
You have a vested interest in this for some reason.
No amount of proof, reason or evidence will change your mind.
Everyone is equally capable of high intelligence if conditioned correctly.
No one in your view is naturally more intelligent from anyone else.
You say this is not Blank Slatism but it is.
genes can never influence intelligence in any way ever (high or low) is what you must believe.
100% RaceRealist wants to hide his racism by calling others racist.
That is why he is calling me names.
That is why people that believe genes can cause differences he must call them racists.
I called you a hereditarian—I distinguish between psychological hereditarianism and racial hereditarianism. You’re a psychological hereditarian.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2023/04/24/the-distinction-between-psychological-and-racial-hereditarianism/
You are Vulgar
My belief the psychological traits are influenced by genes has nothing to do with hereditarianism.
It has everything to do with me rejecting blank slatism AND genetic determinism.
You RaceRealist are still in the mindset of the false dichotomy of the nature nurture debate I long ago rejected as a real debate.
You RaceRealsit are not opposing my beliefs but you are opposing the political opposition to your world view of blank slatism (genetic determinism).
Fuck you and your political agenda.
“My belief the psychological traits are influenced by genes has nothing to do with hereditarianism”
That’s a hereditarian belief.
“It has everything to do with me rejecting blank slatism AND genetic determinism.”
You uphold genetic determinism because you’re a reductionist. You can’t explain to me why Noble/Baverstock/Richardson are wrong. And blank slatism is probably true, and cases of feral children attest to that.
“You RaceRealist are still in the mindset of the false dichotomy of the nature nurture debate I long ago rejected as a real debate.”
Haha you’re clueless.
Yet another article you didn’t read, but I distinguished between psychological hereditarianism (where individual differences between people’s psychology is caused by genes) and racio-hereditarianism (classic racialism a la Rushton, Lynn Jensen, Kanazawa). You’re a psychological hereditarian. (Yet, that too is false, as the new arguments on the gene show, as is the racial variant).
rr: “That’s a hereditarian belief.
You uphold genetic determinism because you’re a reductionist. You can’t explain to me why Noble/Baverstock/Richardson are wrong. And blank slatism is probably true, and cases of feral children attest to that.”
again associating me with the bad group
calling me name does not make it true, go eat shit
rr: “Haha you’re clueless.
Yet another article you didn’t read, but I distinguished between psychological hereditarianism (where individual differences between people’s psychology is caused by genes) and racio-hereditarianism (classic racialism a la Rushton, Lynn Jensen, Kanazawa). You’re a psychological hereditarian. (Yet, that too is false, as the new arguments on the gene show, as is the racial variant).”
it is my opinion that gene influence psychology
that does not make it deterministic, reductionist or hereditarian – go eat shit you racist bastard
“again associating me with the bad group”
Read and understand the distinction I made.
“it is my opinion that gene influence psychology
that does not make it deterministic, reductionist or hereditarian”
That’s a hereditarian claim.
The majority of the general public are hereditarians then, what does that mean?
It means that they—like you—are misinformed.
ok bob
just like the misinformation that people have more intelligence than me (practically I have met people who are more intelligent in quant terms and can do more than me)
To say “someone has more of X”, implies that X is quantifiable. There are numerous arguments that validate the conclusion that psychology is inherently unquantifiable. (Eg, Michell, Trendler, Uher, Nash, Berka).
So yea, you’re just ignorant and misinformed.
There are numerous arguments that validate the conclusion that the earth is flat. Do you believe that too?
Those are invalid.
arguments are just words
they do not prove psychology is unquantifiable
many time I have seen psychology quantified
some people are more angry than others
that is quantifiable as an example
What sets people like RaceRealist apart is the definitions of words.
By coopting the meaning of word they can falsely make their argumentation “valid”.
They will ignore what you mean and turning it around to mean something else.
That is how they win, not by having validity but by cooptation.
George Orwell — ‘War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.’
Again, cringe. I laid out the distinction I made.
rr: “I laid out the distinction I made.”
no you did not, all you can say is “that’s racist”
you cannot allow others to have opinions different from yours
you associated me with the bad group
that was a political move
“rr: “I laid out the distinction I made.””
Ak: “I didn’t read the article.”
“”Ak: I defended the claims I made.””
“rr: a priori you were wrong.”
You didn’t defend them.
if you say so (rolls eyes)
White nationalists: “White people in America are oppressed! >:(“
White people in America:
https://www.cbsnews.com/pittsburgh/news/west-virginia-couple-accused-using-adopted-black-children-as-slaves/
After deputies forced their way in, the girl said the defendants had brought food to her and her brother early that morning and that they had been inside for about 12 hours with no contact from the couple. The girl also said she and her brother were not allowed inside the house and were “locked in the shed for long periods of time daily.”
The children were in dirty clothes and smelled of body odor, and the boy was barefoot and had what appeared to be sores on his feet, Burdette said.
I grew up right next to WVA. This shit doesn’t surprise me. People like to act like City Libs condescend on southern white proles, and that the latter are not actually that dumb, but no, they are dumb as rocks.
Melo, you’re a deluded communist who lives in a bubble of anti-White propaganda. You literally don’t care about per capita, and once again give evidence of it. You don’t know why blacks generally have their names redacted or are called “youths” or whatever euphemism instead of stating their race. You linked an article that said it was because of “de-personing” them or some such bullshit, when it is simply to not incite racial stereotypes.
You know how many blacks recklessly murder Whites and get away with it, let alone don’t get hate crime charges or any of that nonsense? How many black men beat the shit out of their mudshark girlfriends? How many black nannies have killed or hurt innocent White children?
https://www.ajc.com/news/crime/woman-charged-in-2022-midtown-shooting-spree-not-competent-to-stand-trial-judge-rules/PWR4U5P7DBF4BJTQI4RZ24KVWA/
I could literally do this every day, every week, but I’m White and moral and have more important things to do.
Why are you always wrong and so unrepetentant about it?
Interesting that the article you linked called someone with a name “Whitefeather” as a “White person” because you know, that doesn’t hint at any Native American lineage at all. It isn’t another case of the media/government/anti-White organizations labeling a non-White criminal as (pure) European descent.
Just because you don’t like Pill doesn’t mean you need to lie.
I could give you hundreds of personal stories about how non-Whites have fucked over me or my White family members as well, of small or large consquence.
But keep being ignorant I guess.
TAAO explains and predicts that. Hereditarian explanations don’t.
TAAO doesn’t explain anything because it isn’t a self-generating structure. That’s the whole basis of DST being opposed to genetic determinism. Do not speak to me again of racial issues until you understand that. We will never agree since reality is to complicated to do experiments that isolate TAAO as a sufficient explanation of violence or IQ differences.
DST is distinct from the TAAO though. And we know the the correlation between violence and IQ in siblings is -0.01, so IQ can’t be the explainer there. The full and partial TAAO tests justify it’s theoretical framework due to the novel predictions the theory generates.
Hey Pumpkin, can you make sure I got nothing in Spam? I had to make a new account. The email address to my old one got deleted
I found one comment of yours in spam & published it
RaceRealist
Daily blog posts on everything between HBD and sex differences and anything involving cultural Marxism.
–
No one should trust him (rr) ever.
He is a sleeper agent.
“Mastering Psychological Warfare”
https://youtu.be/Sw8d85M5KUQ?si=Xppu5iOGYwrpuZ9u
Cringe
RaceRealist’s political agenda is cringe.
A systems view of life where one resource doesn’t have primacy over any other isn’t a “political agenda.”
calling people racist because they believe genes influence psychology is stupid
Genes can’t influence psychology—and psychology isn’t a science.
(And that’s a hereditarian position.)
associating people with different opinions with your enemy group is also bad
Did you read my distinction?
The political agenda is where you assert that equality between groups and a specific agenda that should be followed by civilization or a state without actually understanding how genes interact with the rest of the environments, when empirical evidence only shows malleability in development of traits rather than complete nondetermination by genetics, which would support a type of national socialism rather than a multinational one because it would be valuing both education and genetic-environment interaction without thinking one could completely remake the environment for every individual.
“The political agenda is where you assert that equality between groups”
Depends what you mean by “equality.” I think we should have equity. But equality in IQ is possible.
“when empirical evidence only shows malleability in development of traits rather than complete nondetermination by genetics”
Are you saying that empirical evidence shows determination of traits through gene pathways?
Isn’t that what any study of inheritance (showing correlations between parents and children, twins, siblings, etc.) shows? Genes work at least probabilistically. We can’t isolate the environment perfectly but that disposes of any argument against genes as well.
“Depends what you mean by “equality.” I think we should have equity. But equality in IQ is possible.”
It would at best, make more sense to Flynn effect everyone’s IQs as much as possible across the board rather than form our societies with the focus of equalizing IQs. And that requires separation so that the lowers aren’t messing up the environment of the highers.
“Isn’t that what any study of inheritance (showing correlations between parents and children, twins, siblings, etc.) shows?”
Well yea they show correlations, but there are invalidating assumptions that are devestating to twin and adoption studies. It’s been known for a long time that family studies can’t show causation, either.
“It would at best, make more sense to Flynn effect everyone’s IQs as much as possible across the board rather than form our societies with the focus of equalizing IQs. And that requires separation so that the lowers aren’t messing up the environment of the highers.”
I can see how you would say that. But through the years—and even since the inception of IQ—we know that we can change the test if we have different assumptions (eg Terman changing the test to equalize scores between men and women, blacks scoring higher than whites on the BITCH100 and chitlins test, scores being equalized between two white South African groups).
Nevermind the fact that IQ doesn’t have the “predictive validity” it’s claimed it has.
80% of the public believe genes influence psychology
So what?
exactly, so what?
That doesn’t matter.
Anyway, here’s a reference (I like those. You don’t.) (Condit, 2011:625)
nice chart
practically you can call them racist now
The point is, it doesn’t matter. (Just showing you evidence.)
So did you read the distinction?
rr: “The point is, it doesn’t matter. (Just showing you evidence.)”
then stop calling me names
The totality of RaceRealist’s Agenda is this:
Label people who have supposed “wrong ideas” so they look bad.
Why? So he can defeat his political enemies.
It does not matter who he attacks as long as he can associate any person who has any idea he disagrees with as wrong think.
He must associate you with all the ideas of this bad group of people.
You are not allowed to have any idea that is wrong.
Therefore all your ideas must be the same as the group he is associating you with who are his political enemies.
You are not allowed to have an opinion separate from this group, you are not an individual with separate thoughts or feelings from this group, you are one hundred percent of this group if you share a single idea with them. Ideologically speaking if you do not agree with RaceRealist 100% you are of the enemy group period. You are the the enemy group to RaceRealist from having an opinion.
–
I urge everyone reject this.
You are not the enemy group just because rr calls you so.
Wrong think is bullshit, it is political tactics to discourage freedom of thought. It is because he must defeat all racisms that any idea can be called racist as long as it disagrees with anything he says is racist.
Do not believe science is racists just because rr says so.
Richard Lynn was a racist. He had a whole agenda to make people believe that black people are genetically less intelligent than other races. You probably won’t read this either but there’s a call to retract Lynn’s work and any work that cites it, do you think that’s a “political agenda” or that’s just doing good science to retract garbage with serious methodological issues? Must be a “political movement” to you to erase that garbage from the scientific cannon.
https://www.statnews.com/2024/06/20/richard-lynn-racist-research-articles-journals-retractions/
God, you are so cringe, you can’t defend your (false) view, you can’t provide specific citations for ridiculous claims you make, you’re overly emotional about an online discussion… Maybe “pill” is right and you are an autistic person.
proving my point race realist is associating me with “the bad group”
anyone who disagrees with anything RaceRealis says he will call racist
I have defended my view that genes influence psychology
basically proteins have shapes
the body is then influenced
but this is axiomatic
a priori race realist denys that difference in the body does not effect psychology
therefore he cannot be reasoned with
citations for genes having shapes he rejected also
“What is an allele? | Animation | Minute to Understanding”
“Protein folding explained”
rr: “Maybe “pill” is right and you are an autistic person.”
Autism is genetic but you deny the body influences psychology so piss off
“I have defended my view that genes influence psychology”
It’s not an empirical question.
I want an actual citation for your claim. How many days we going on now with you not giving me one?
“Autism is genetic but you deny the body influences psychology so piss off”
ASD lacks biological and construct validity.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40489-016-0085-x
(Do you see [claim], [citation]? That’s how it’s done. And it’s a relevant citation, not like the YouTube videos you post. Anything that’s not common knowledge needs a citation. If I say the sun is 93 million miles from earth that doesn’t need a citation. But if I make the claims that you do, that needs a citation.)
rr: It’s not an empirical
Ak: a priori bodies influence psychology
RR: calls Ak autistic
RR: then says autism does not exist
Its not an empirical question.
And I said that to get a rise out of you.
meaning that it is all about faith
you have faith bodies do not effect psychology
Scientism is false.
and?
Can we gain knowledge through thinking about concepts or only thought empirical endeavors?
If Oprah has an IQ above 110…it would be a literal miracle considering what we know about blacks.
^^autism^^
You said RR had an IQ of 150. Youre the clown.
LIE! I said his general knowledge score was super high; & his SATs were super low and his IQ in between
You believe it! You said his general knowledge was 150IQ level and you backed it up by saying he reads PHD level analytic philosophy LOL.
| bel|eve h|s general knowledge |s super h|gh but that’s only about 10% of your Wechsler |Q score
Well you certainly disagree with Marsha when she said RR was the dumbest person in the comment section.
If you think I’m the dumbest person that comments here (how are you defining “dumb”?), then you’re the dumb one. (Especially if you believe “Marsha” is a real person.)
Generally speaking everyone here except Melo and Puppy think youre the dumbest person here. You are literally at the point where you deny basic high school science.
Philo has one of the lowest social IQs on the blog.
That makes no sense. The normal distribution exists for blacks as well.
pill doesn’t get overlapping distributions at all. He thinks IQ is like skin color where there’s very little overlap between blacks and whites
Pills g is not low, he does not have autism.
What causes him to be that way pp?
I see the same shit from rr
ego defense (protecting a word view)
or is it a true belief he has?
if it is he is deluded (complete lack of reality)
in any case it is a cognitive deficit
FYI the average IQ of blacks is 60. Thank you.
(Also Oprah was also raised in an extremely low IQ environment).
|t’s only below 70 n Afr|ca because malnutrt|on & zero wh|te adm|xture. |n the U.S. |t’s 80 (zero wh|te adm|xture) to 95 (75% wh|te admxture)
Soc|al env|ronment has no effect by m|d l|fe
“This thing that doesn’t exist is low.”
Im so far ahead of you in IQ, I already adjusted for all that. Blacks have an average IQ of 80. When you consider Oprah grew up in a mud hut in the deep south, she had horrible childhood nutrition, lead was in the water and she got pregnant 15 times, you knock of at least 1SD. Oprah isn’t particularly tall to make up for it. She has zero academic achievements. Her full time job is talking to random people. Her favourite books like Toni Morrison or The Secret, not even children would read.
So I adjusted for everything and my best guess of her iq is 65 or 70. Shes literally the female version of Muhammed Ali. All her protein in vitro went into social intelligence.
And from the very start I openly admit Oprah is top 1% social intelligence. I get that.
There is a difference between measuring intelligence and intelligence itself. You can deny that the numbers exist but not the fact that humans have cognition and that some humans have more or less cognitive load.
“There is a difference between measuring intelligence and intelligence itself.”
There’s no (valid) response in the literature to the Berka-Nash measurement objection, and the only one there is fails and it fails spectacularly.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2023/12/29/a-critical-examination-of-responses-to-berkas-1983-and-nashs-1990-philosophical-inquiries-on-mental-measurement-from-brand-et-al-2003/
“You can deny that the numbers exist”
I don’t deny that. What is my view here?
“but not the fact that humans have cognition and that some humans have more or less cognitive load”
I deny the “more or less” here, since that assumes metrication. And we know that humans have the same ability to learn (https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2221311120) and that standardized tests show how much one has learned.
And the normal distribution is built into the test and test averages between groups have been changed before based on different assumptions. (Citations upon request.)
You can say the same thing about malnourishment and abuse for Chris Langan, and clearly he is much more intelligent than 99% of Whites or others.
Oprah was able to read at a young age, despite the problems she faced, and obviously, since she reads the books in her book club, which is much more than most blacks do, and even most East Asians or Whites do, and then discusses them (I think, I never paid attention to that), she’s obviously has intelligence above the average Westerner. (That’s for reading and socializing, she’s good at managing her empire and finding talent like Phil McGraw as well).
Learning is part of intelligence.
cognitive load exists
That claim doesn’t refute the argument.
the video proves some people are more capable cognitively than others
Doesn’t refute the argument.
what argument?
some people have more cognitive load than others, watch the video
can you refute this?
“I deny the “more or less” here, since that assumes metrication. And we know that humans have the same ability to learn (https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2221311120) and that standardized tests show how much one has learned.”
all cognitive load in every person is exactly the same?
I suppose ed witten was raised better than me or something and I can become just as intelligent if I try harder?
Try actually responding to what I wrote.
more or less cognitive load is self evidenced by people I have seen, apparently that’s not a response you will accept
I’ve said for years that everyone could have the same potential and that it merely crystallizes differently due to differences in experience/upbringing (eg Vygotsky’s ZPD, MKO and his whole socio-historical theory of learning and development)—and what do you know, it’s been confirmed (as the reference I cited shows.
Muhammed Ali was also considered charismatic and entertaining…he had a 65IQ. Which is roughly about Oprahs level.
LOL! You have no intuition.
And Ali’s IQ was 85 btw,
I got sacked again. FML. This time my manager made up bullshit reasons to get rid of me. She just didn’t like me. Sigh.
This ruling by the corrupt Supreme Court to basically make the president a dictator…its basically the final end point of neoliberalism.
What a seriously idiotic decision. Maybe even worse than Citizens United.
^^^CNN^^^
i haven’t read the decision, but i’m sure it is NOT what CNN and the guardian say it is.
same with citizens united.
sometimes judges aren’t just politicians. they are actual judges calling balls and strikes according to the rules of the game.
The ruling was 6-3 dumbass. Just like the citizens united was a corrupt vote.
You need to be re educated from the ground up if you think Dersh is legit. I know things about Dersh that would make you never listen to him again.
so do i. but i also know that about YOU, cnn, and the guardian. sad.
for more on how you are retarded: https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radiolabmoreperfect/episodes/citizens-united
here’s another for you to come to terms with your own retardation and autism.
Citizens united is a totally ridiculous decision. Only a fucking complete retard or jew thinks that it was a great decision.
Now Mugabe will tell me why ‘free speech’ = political donations and even if it doesn’t , “free speech” is more important than stopping corruption. Autism squared.
no idiot!
we’re talking law here. NOT morality or practicality. LISTEN to my link!
tucker agrees that the correct LEGAL decision was made in citizens united.
imagine if you were a billionaire and you wanted to run ads supporting your own bullshit. and the government said, “you can’t do that.” you would think, “fuck you government!”
Exactly autism squared. The court could have decided billionaires could put out ads saying they like dogs. But it made the ruling so that basically billionaires could blanket the media with political ads for candidates. They knew what they were doing. Unlike you, the judges and the people that paid them to make this ruling don’t have autism.
So basically by admitting you wouldn’t live near blacks you admit I’m right about blacks but because of cognitive dissonance, you still feel they are the ‘good guys’. What a tiny little brain you have.
There are tons of blacks I’d live near. Never said they were the good guys; I’m saying you’re a bad guy for attacking the powerless. I don’t care whether were’re talking about blacks, the white working class, Uyghurs, or Palestinians. Bullying powerless groups is right-wing & low IQ.
You wouldn’t live in a black neighbourhood with a random selection of blacks. Period.
I stand up for the oppressed – the gentiles. You prop up jewish rule and their evil minions, the blacks.
The fact you think a total idiot like Oprah is smarter than most jews or able to win a hard science nobel is so ridiculous. Its evidence that youre too biased to work in psychometrics.
You look at a black person and basically automatically jack up their IQ by 50 points if you like them or find them entertaining or they agree with your BLM politics.
If you understood overlapping bell curves you’d know that there are some blacks that are smarter than 99% of American Jews. And the richest & biggest brained black of the 20th century is probably one of them.
Michael Jordan is richer than Oprah, does he have a higher IQ?
He only recently became slightly richer than her thanks to a very lucky investment in some sports team; for decades she was several times richer.
Jordan got rich using PHYSICAL abilities. Oprah got rich using MENTAL abilities. The latter takes much more IQ.
When a Jewish media legend asked Oprah when she’d find a man, he quickly realized he had met his match IQ-wise
“When I lose 40 lbs it’ll happen”
“No when I lose 60 lbs it’ll happen”
“And if it doesn’t happen, I might come a calling ON YOU!”
Millions of Americans saw the 60 minute interview & thought “who is this sassy black woman? Let’s check out her show”
She got rich using talking abilities which takes zero IQ.
Talking is what separates intelligent humans from the low IQ animals we dominate. Fish swim, birds fly, cheetahs run, and humans talk.
“Talking is what separates intelligent humans from the low IQ animals we dominate. Fish swim, birds fly, cheetahs run, and humans talk.”
My man.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2022/12/28/nonhuman-animals-are-not-agents-language-sets-humans-apart-from-the-rest-of-the-animal-kingdom/
Interesting article. Fits with the Richard Klein view that biological change in the brain likely promoting language is what transformed humans 50,000 years ago from just another larger mammal roaming the landscape to a geological force
what is the transition from animal to human
at some point pp, by rr logic an animal with no mind gave birth to a human with a mind
That happened 50,000 years ago if we believe Klein’s brain mutation theory & RR’s definition of mind.
The body influences psychology.
This is true
Therefore because proteins have shapes
and people have different proteins in the body
The body is different and psychology is different
–
RaceRealist denys the body can influence psychology a priori
This automatically means proteins have no effect on psychology in his world view.
As long as he cannot accept the body and psychology work together he cannot accept proteins have shapes.
This is how deep his racism is and why he must call you a hereditarian.
Genes can’t affect psychology. Why do you think we get such low SNP h2? We know that the total SNP heritability is like 0.04. How does that affect your worldview?
a priori genes effect psychology
What’s the argument for that claim?
axioms do not need argumentation
argumentation comes after the axiom
You can’t just make that assumption. What’s the argument for that claim?
bodily differences do not effect psychology is an assumption based on faith.
I can make the reverse assumption.
Just give me the argument for the claim.
it is not a claim
it is an ontological assumption
I assume bodies effect psychology therefore proteins must affect it by the differences in genes
you go in reverse
you assume bodies do not effect psychology therefore proteins must not effect it by the differences in genes
neirth can be proven because they are faith based
no argument can make either true
it is ontological belief
“a priori genes effect psychology”
That’s a claim and you need an argument for it—what’s the argument?
why?
ontological beliefs do not need argumentation
You need an argument, just like I give arguments for the irreducibility of the mental (that genes can’t affect psychology).
you base things on faith
so all I need do is the same thing
your arguments do not make it true that genes can’t effect psychology
it is an unfalsifiable claim
thus faith based
It’s not an empirical matter so falsification is irrelevant. Scientism is false.
So you admit it’s not science?
Of course I admit that; I never claimed otherwise.
Now when you accurately say RR doesn’t believe in 90% of the high school science, he will then try to ‘redefine’ the word science or say his ‘science’ from crackpot gender theory jewish academics is the real science, and the mainstream science is all wrong.
A fall back option is to say, we aren’t reading the high school textbook properly, and only he and few jewish gender studies people can read it properly.
Finally, the ’emergency’ debate option is to call everyone racist.
What “high school science” do I deny? Be specific. Quote me, if you can. (You won’t.)
-Selective breeding
-Mendelian genetics
-Genetics effecting the development of the brain
-genetics in general
-Darwinism
-mental illness being heritable
-autism being genetic
These are all MAINSTREAM 99% consensus views by people. Any doctor or scientist or psychologist would agree with these.
“Selective breeding”
I don’t deny that. I deny the analogy between SB and NS—selective breeders can control environments to select-for traits, but this isn’t the case for NS (see Fodor’s argument).
“Genetics affecting the development of the brain”
Why do you mean by “affecting”? I don’t take a reductionist view, I take a holist, irreducible one.
“genetics in general”
Quote me.
“Darwinism”
The extended evolutionary synthesis has more predictive and explanatory power than the (neo-) Darwinian NS.
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2015.1019
“mental illness being heritable”
I don’t see any reason to believe that.
“autism being genetic”
ASD lacks biological and construct validity.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40489-016-0085-x
rr: “What “high school science” do I deny? Be specific.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allele
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein_folding
Haha nope. And “be specific” means “explaining.”
-Selective breeding one more time!
-Mendelian genetics
-Genetics effecting the development of the brain
-genetics in general
-Darwinism
-mental illness being heritable FALSE in the sense YOU mean by “heritable”!
-autism being genetic FALSE!
These are all MAINSTREAM 99% consensus views by people. AND THEY’RE WRONG! Any doctor or scientist or psychologist would agree with these. IT’S CALLED IDEOLOGY!
OBVIOUSLY PILL HAS NEVER READ MARX OR UNNUHSTOOD HIM.
SAD!
the claim of mugabe and that trans-italian swank is that:
you rejected my explanations
why repeat myself?
Because they’re nonsense—I’ve been giving you the references, explanations, and arguments for months and you show no understanding of them nor showing that you event read them.
Hahaha, nice little weasel.
You can’t debate with a weasel. He’ll keep changing his position if it starts to get embarrassing.
Deep down he just wants his ideology to be accepted for ‘moral’ reasons.
Let’s see if you can continue the debate we just started then.
it was actually mrs TWEEDY.
the point is that horses are super selectively bred.
and it’s been 51 years and big red’s numbers are still the records in all three of the triple crown races.
cockring responded to me. he admitted: selection limit. (but only for thoroughbred race horses.)
We may have reached a selection limit in terms of creating the fastest horse or the smartest human, but that doesn’t mean we’ve reached a selection limit for raising the AVERAGE horse or AVERAGE human of different races. It could be that the selection limit for IQ is around 200 and that all major human races have reached that with at least one individual. But that doesn’t necessarily mean the AVERAGE member of each race is equally genetically close to that limit & thus genes of small effect still explain most of the variation in human IQ just as they do speed in horses
So it could be practically impossible to breed a horse faster than Secretariat, but Secretariat is probably +5 SD compared to the average horse. So while we can’t breed horses to be faster than Secretariat, we can still keep breeding them until the AVERAGE horse = Secretetariat and the varoation = 0.
Analogously, we can keep breeding humans until the AVERAGE human is as smart as John Von Neumann, with some races like Ashkenazi Jews perhaps reaching this average first, and others like say, pure Australian aboriginals, probably never reaching it.
Even Puppy has higher VIQ than Mugabe. Simple analogies is all you need.
Cultural Marxism politics (psych warfare)
This is evil.
rr goes too far because retarded. but he agrees with the following propositions which no one else here agrees with except me.
btw ALL so-called “social sciences” are pseudosciences. economics is worse than psychology even though econ majors have the highest IQs of all soc majors, as noted by larry summers.
melo: if you’re not smart enough to unnuhstan quantum chromodynamics then you’re not smart enough to unnuhstan intersectional gender science.
melo, rr, pill = terrence howard
peepee = rogan
mugabe = weinstein
= SAD!
Did you know I have a gene where marijuana causes me to have psychosis. This is true.
But also I am 98% likely to become an alcoholic if I start to drink. The reason I am not an alcoholic is I hate bitter tastes (another gene) but this means I have tremendous psychological pain I have to deal with on my own.
Psychology is somewhat important to artificial intelligence but neuroscience is more important. Looking into what the brain does I could make a decent A.I. but the environment must be in place for learning. Most A.I. stuff is behaviorist Stimulus response methods. My approach is 5 dimensional.
Mugabe is idiotic as well.
He thinks mental illnesses don’t exist and pharmaceuticals don’t effect the brain. Clown.
Both RR and Mugabe don’t believe in HBD for largely religious/moral reasons. In that sense, Anime is more intelligent than these two women, with their ’emotional baggage’
if humans hadn’t reached a selection limit…
imagine that!
do it!
it would mean that it would NOT be hard to find high IQ and low IQ individual genes.
so this many genes of small effect jive is the last pathetic gasp of a failed paradigm. it’s totally at odds with darwinism.
so steve shoe et al are effectively creationists.
sad.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_heritability_problem
Oh my god. I just realised it.
Mugabe is like RR.
He thinks everyone has the same genetics and is of the same inherent intelligence. HAHAHAHA.
^^^AUTISM^^^
you sound like one of those people with a yard sign against trump.
approximation vs reality.
pill: approximation is false and corrupt and neoliberal and english.
mugabe: no! you have autism! sad!
OBVIOUSLY some pipo are conceived retarded. like rr and yourself.
and even some peoples (maybe) like negritos.
but every human is a secretariat of cognitive ability is approximately TRUE.
Hahaha RR and Mugabe should get married.
“He thinks everyone has the same genetics”
Nope.
“and is of the same inherent intelligence.”
I see no reason to believe that’s false.
mug: “every human is a secretariat of cognitive ability“
I see what you mean:
Like me having both alcoholic genes and not liking bitter tastes genes.
They cancel out.
So seeing what all combinations do is hard to factor.
“alcoholic genes…not liking bitter tastes genes”
Nonsense. What a nonsense understanding of genes. There are good explainers for you (Kampourakis, Richardson), but you won’t read them.
-you won’t read them
thanks for reminding me that I am poor and on welfare and can’t afford books
and no, I will not steal books from pirate sites
You’re choosing to live in ignorance.
Here are the books. (You can lead a horse to water but can’t make it drink.)
https://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=4340E6523C4176E4B2650BD8CD97C0B8
https://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=BD612C527FE9E83DF6207060D27054B8
we when over this: I am not ignorant of what genes do
genes regulate the biological system of cells
you just do not accept that I understand so you can defame my character
Google safety search tells me these websites contain malware.
the second link summary says “the concept of intelligence” – meaning intelligence is not real.
it says “people have been told that their potential as humans is limited” – meaning that anyone can do anything if the try hard enough
–
“building on work being done in molecular biology, epigenetics, dynamical systems, evolution theory, and complexity theory, it maps a fresh understanding of intelligence and the development of human potential.”
meaning the race realist thinks I am stupid because I have repeated this over and over – genes regulate cell systems
he must reject that I understand all this so he can defame me, once a person is defamed you can reject everything else they say. “he is racist/reductionist therefore you can reject all he says”
“genes regulate the biological system of cells”
The genome is an organ of the cell.
“it says “people have been told that their potential as humans is limited” – meaning that anyone can do anything if the try hard enough”
A quick blurb about the book or spending a week reading it.. Hmm what would I accept?
“meaning the race realist thinks I am stupid because I have repeated this over and over – genes regulate cell systems”
You’re just misinformed. I led you to water—with multiple references, arguments, and explanations for months in end—but you’ve yet to explain how they’re wrong. All the while you link Wikipedia, then you say you “understand” it. Curious.
Even in the extreme case that there ever was such thing as a clash between free speech and stopping corruption, non autistic people should always choose stopping corruption.
In the end the corruption will take away your free speech.
^^^High IQ analysis vs ‘libertarian’ Mugabe
dude!
you’re so dumb you keep confusing LEGAL with MORAL.
I’m not the one failing to understand the legal part, you are.
All the judges had to do was make a carve out for political donations or quasi campaigning. Literally all it needed was a sentence.
They didn’t. They knew the rich aren’t going to run ads talking about their favouritie dog dumbass. The whole point was to deregulate campaign finance.
Now Mugabe will say campaign finance regulation is unconstitutional. Just wait for it. 3. .2. 1….
Remember kids, in the fight between moral codes, the libertarian is always the loser.
Because the supreme court is corrupt and the judges were literally bribed to make bribery easier, why doesn’t the media or politicians or even celebrities just bash the justices for being puppets?
This genteel manner the world treats Thomas and the other clowns is just …basically if you don’t say anything, normal average IQ people on the street think the supreme court is actually legitimate.
The way to end an institution in the long run is to take away its legitimacy.
“why doesn’t the media or politicians or even celebrities just bash the justices for being puppets?”
They do. Like, a lot. It’s literally all I see on the internet right now. Other than Biden old memes.
I’m actually surprised no one has taken things into their own hands. If I didn’t’ have anything to lose, that’s what I’d dedicate my short life to.
black women who look like monkeys should also be included in the list of NON-secretariats.
sometimes aesthetics lie.
but not always.
sad.
can’t we all just get along and agree thelonious monk was a genius?
c’mom dude!
reminds me: human vs animal fights. totally unfair and totally unfair.
the animal has strength and teeth.
the human has wrestling.
Kamala FUMES Over Democrats SNUBBING Her To Replace Biden (youtube.com)
Im going to predict something that nobody in the comment section or 99.9% of the population could predict about Kamala.
Eventually we are going to find out that Kamala has the same thing as Loaded. Its a form of schiz. And they are hiding it as hard as they can.
I got ‘lucky’ that what I have is treatable with basically tranquilisers. What Loaded/Kamala has, can’t be medicated. Theres nothing in current modern medical science that can make it better.
The oldest disease known to man – madness!
Irish people have 3 or 4x more schiz than other whites. We are…the blacks of Europe.
All you need to do is watch videos of her talking without a teleprompter or reciting a learned speech.
When she has to talk ‘ad hoc’, shes basically the female Loaded and…basically she doesn’t make a lick of sense. Not even to herself.
The only times she makes no sense is when she talks about new age metaphysics. Much of the time she is analytical & concise:
Its late stage neoliberalism.
They literally run a dementia person and a person with schizophrenia as the presidential ticket just because they can control them.
Sad!
because (((irish people))) are stupid i have to repeat this:
humans, despite the sometimes striking differences in appearance, are more similar GENETICALLY than chimps in the same troop.
this too has been explained by a BOTTLENECK.
so all humans are ash jews.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_bottleneck#Humans
But the genetic similarity is misleading because most of the genome is selectively neutral. When Hawks et al (2007) looked at the adaptive genome, they found humans to be like wildly different species.
Adds Hawks: “We are more different genetically from people living 5,000 years ago than they were different from Neanderthals”
https://news.wisc.edu/genome-study-places-modern-humans-in-the-evolutionary-fast-lane/
Of course their theory has not been replicated by others afaik
LOL Mugabe and RR think schiz is ‘learned’ not inherent. Hahahaha. Kamala is copying her daddy everyone. Shes talking like a spaz!
It’s kind of crazy watching the downfall of my home in real time. Democrats honestly deserve this.
Like, I get it. The people on the other side are NOT acting in good faith. Most videos of Joe Biden acting old were edited (like the paratrooper one). Mugabe and Philo aren’t against Immigration because they’re moral people who care about the economic impacts. They just don’t like non-whites.
The bad-faith actors ruin it for everyone else, because when legitimate concerns our brought forth, people don’t listen. There is no such thing as critical thinking when the collective consciousness is controlled by the Media.
Now, you have all these right-wingers circle jerking feeling like they’ve been vindicated and it’s just going to get worse. We’ve lost the election. It’s over. Hey at least I’ll have extra cash in my pocket when there isn’t an income tax. At least for a little bit until inflation skyrockets, or until I’m deported because they think I’m Hispanic.
You lost 24 years ago when the corrupt judges put Bush in and threw out Gore’s candidacy. You could argue America never recovered from that because Gore would have chosen liberal justices to replace the retarded bots on the court.
The supreme court is more important than the presidency. It took me a while following american politics to realise it.
again you have no idea what your talking about. bush v gore was actually a 7-2 decision. the 5-4 split was on the remedy. and an election that comes down to 500 votes can’t be “stolen”. none of the justices voted in FLA obviously.
the justices can’t amend the constitution moron. all they can do is interpret it. they can’t approve a “carve out” for political advocacy.
you are correct. serious campaign finance reform requires a constitutional amendment. just like serious gun control.
…what you‘re talking about…
i admit i’m retarded.
“. You could argue America never recovered from that because Gore would have chosen liberal justices to replace the retarded bots on the court.”
It’s crazy how I hadn’t heard of this until recently. I was honestly shocked to learn that a group of judges got to decide who the fucking president was.
I’ve argued before that Bush, while a well-meaning person, was a much worse president than Trump.
It’s hard to tell where the future would have ended up because good things can lead to bad things and vice versa, but my god I wish Gore had been president.
Mugabe and Philo aren’t against Immigration because they’re moral people who care about the economic impacts. They just don’t like non-whites.
^^^BRAINWASHED LIAR WHO HATES WHITES^^^
i would’ve been against mass immigration when it was all coming from europe. the average person always has been. mass immigration has always been un-democratic. the people have always been against it.
Lol, I don’t hate whites. I am white.
I just think nationalism is archaic and dumb.
so your biological father wasn’t filipino? there are no white filipinos. or are you saying obama is white too?
I’m saying Obama is white too.
but yes. i want racists like melo deported. and he’s not alone. ALL the actual racism in america is in one direction.
and it’s a marxist fact that if a country selects its immigrants with an IQ test, rich countries where education and nutrition are great will have a disproportionate number of pipo who could immigrate if they wanted to. (but they usually don’t want to.) that’s all trump meant by “shithole countries”. and these countries are all majority white or they’re s korea, japan, taiwan, hong kong, singpore, the gulf states.
Some retard seriously asked to “give an argument as to why the Principle of Sufficient Reason should be accepted”. So he wanted a sufficient reason that proved the principle of sufficient reason.
Reasons are just explanations for why something is rather than isn’t. Even if that explanation is bad like “the universe just popped itself into existence” or “randomness”.
all the explanations I give rr he calls nonsense
no matter what “argument” you give he rejects because of his prior assumptions
it is as if a theist asks: “what is the argument that god does not exist”
in no way can you give an argument that will prove him wrong because of his prior beliefs
prior beliefs by default can never be challenged because they are ontological – meaning they are what you believe about reality by default such as God
I said bodies effect psychology and he will never accept this ontologically no matter what explanation I give.
once we travel down that road the only option left is to say why can it not be proven, this leads to radical skepticism (how can anything be proven?) Philosophy is a bitch.
I hold the beliefs I do due to logical argumentation.
To be fair, you seem to consistently not understand what RR is saying.
rr being a dualist will always make arguments to support dualism – he will never change his mind
I understand that he rejects the body as influencing psychology
I understand he rejects my view that genes regulate cell metabolism so he can call me names
he just wants me to be wrong to support his views
all melo can say is “anime does not understand”
he pretends not to see what rr is doing
rr believes unfalsifiable things
and wants others to believe them too
Melo actually disagrees with my view but go off.
Yes or no—whether something is falsifiable (that is, whether something is empirical) is the only way to know whether something is true or false (or, put another way, we can only gain knowledge through empiricism).
No medical doctor on planet earth, not even in Pakistan or Nigeria would say the body has no influence on the mind. None.
radical skepticism ala philosophy makes all positions faith based argumentation
this is why philosophy and science are hard to reconcile
you can always say you disbelieve the pre propositions presented and then discount the rest
Logical arguments are “faith based”?
your arguments are unfalsifiable
unfalsifiability = faith based
Science must contend with the fact that religion never goes away.
Is scientism true? Is the only way we can know things through empiricism?
I am a monist idealist
I reject both dualism and materialism
The problem isn’t using logic to know things RR, the problem is you don’t have the ability to use logic, or at least you pretend you don’t know how to reason.
Youre hiding like a weasel. People in a real life debate hall or high IQ gathering would literally laugh at all your beliefs and positions and frankly just your haircut and your pinched face from being angry at ‘immoral’ people.
That doesn’t answer the question.
“frankly just your haircut”
It’s OK if you’re bald man. Take some finestaride to stop the hair loss and minoxidil to regrow hair and you’ll be fine (a low number of people show negative sexual side effects to fin, but it’s rare and it’s not like you get any pussy anyway).
I would literally rather have sex with a corpse than drill oil.
At this point they should run Oprah with Marianne Williamson as VP. I would vote for that as long as Williamson did a Cheney and was the real President and Oprah was just there for acting.
IMO America is in terminal decline. I think everyone would agree with that.
People say it started with Reagan and the neoliberals. But from a technical perspective, America could have stumbled on under a moderate like Gore.
Instead we had full on zionists in charge under Bush. I mean….neoliberalism is already cancer. Neoconservativism is basically having alzheimers on top of cancer.
Neocons and Neolibs are still in power btw.
Does Biden know he has dementia? Not a lot of those people actually know whats happening to them.
it’s interesting in a steve shoe way: questions like “who’s smarter mathematicians or (theoretical) physicists”? of course these are little distinct except in name. but it is interesting that of world chess champions anderssen, morphy, steinitz, lasker, euwe = math. capa = civil engineering i think. botvinnik = electrical engineering i think. smyslov = singer, but after that they’re all just pure chess players afaik. philidor was a musician.
Funny video about the validatiation of conclusions:
KFC IS ILLUMINATI CONFIRMED
We cannot test if gene do not effect psychology?
so it is unfalsifiable
–
just give me the test that shows genes don’t affect psychology
this must be a valid test
the same kind of test the proves God does not exist
up to those standards
I’ve realised that Mugabe is not as smart as I once thought. The first body blow was when I realised he was religious. He says the stuff in the Bible actually literally happened.
The second body blow was when he finally admitted he doesn’t believe in HBD after 5 years.
And the then the nail in the coffin is when he said all humans have roughly the same intelligence, genetically.
When you read his legal analysis…’no such thing as carve outs’….openly partisan supreme court decisions are legitimate….campaign finance is against the constitution….gun laws need a consitutional amendment to be fixed (lol)…..what his verbal IQ? 110? 115? Something like that?
Every day, its starting to look like Mugabe and RR agree on all basic science – ie that its ‘wrong’. When you agree with a high school dropout with a black child and a fitness job on whether science is real or not, you need to reflect in my opinion.
I’m not a drop out, I have a great career making solid money and a loving family. You’re a racist, wanna-be American Ian Miles Cheong who’s always talking about America and American politics along with Jews and blacks from all the way across the pond. You just got fired from like your 20th job. You admit on that you don’t take showers and wash your hair. Sad, man. You probably look like a troll.
Your job is basically a fake job. And its definitely not considered by anyone to be a high IQ activity/profession. I think I’m well within my rights to say listening to a fitness intstructor’s opinion on high school science, a topic he barely understand academically, is a valid ad hominem.
I’ve had the same job for a long time. I make great money. It’s obviously false that I understand more than high school science and philosophy. Stay mad that I have a better life than you.
If you had a better life, you wouldn’t be drilling oil dumbass hahaha.
I’m successful in life. So yea, I have a better life.
So puppy is right about Mugabe and his childhood IQ score. I was wrong. I take it back. I was too impressed with his math degree. Maybe it was an online math degree from a mexican university.
When the justices stopped the count in Florida (because Jeb Bush was blocking the proper count), there was basically a coup d’etat.
Obviously back then, the average clown like Mugabe respected the supreme court as a bastion of legal analysis.
We now know the supreme court is basically a political body. Whoever controls the justices gets to dictate policy on every single policy area. Ergo, the supreme court is more important than congress or the presidency. Maybe even both those branches combined. It a fundemental flaw in the constitution, because the court is more powerful than the other branches and theres no way to get rid of a corrupt justice.
FDR had a solution…
Threaten to pack the court. Then the aristocracy will back down.
It took me a long time to realise the importance of the court. When Bush v Gore happened in 2000, I should have known as a teenager.
I was dumb back then. I thought the justices actually followed the law LOL.
All these massive decisions are partisan votes Mugabe. There is no law. Only power.
For the autistic, yes there is legal precedents and legal ‘principles’. For the non autistic – these always need to be ‘interpreted’. And basically the law is whatever you want at that point.
Maybe the constitution should have been in math.
There have been many attempted and actual coups in american history so we shouldn’t be surprised actually. Neocons wanted a puppet, so they instructed the justices to throw the ballots into the river.
Gore won by the way dumbass. In the final count, he had actually won. Jeb was stalling the result, pretty openly.
I sent Al Gore a letter once about fuel efficiency in cars I found in popular science magazine, I got back a letter from his estate in tennessee but tore it up because of a “depression” episode. this was in 2009