It wouldn’t be Christmas without Tracy Chapman’s haunting rendition of O Holy Night.
Merry Christmas!
26 Tuesday Dec 2023
Posted in Uncategorized
26 Tuesday Dec 2023
Posted in Uncategorized
It wouldn’t be Christmas without Tracy Chapman’s haunting rendition of O Holy Night.
Pumpkin Person 
Merry Christmas Pumpkin.
Stellvia OP
i checked it in two ways. for a standard trivariate normal distribution where the correlation between…
x and y = a
x and z = b
y and z = c
the regression plane is…
E(x) = y(a – b*c)/(1 – c^2) + z(b – a*c)/(1 – c^2)
so if a = b = c = 0.80 and z = 2, the regression line for x is…
E(x) = 4y/9 + 8/9 = (0.444…)*y + 1.111…
whereas without the second test z it’s just…
E(x) = a*y.
peepee: but this means that at very high y the latter line is greater than the former.
mugabe: correct. because then z = 2 is too low…unexpectedly low…given y.
8/9 = 0.888… not 1.111… fucktard!
so the two lines intersect at 2.5. (2.5 – 2)/0.6 = 5/6.
PHI(5/6) = 0.8
the lines cross at y = 3.125.
peepee needs to apologize for being so incredibly bad at math that she can’t even unnuhstan how bad she is at math.
sad.///
You need to apologize for being on the wrong side of this argument for YEARS
i agree i’ve been on the RIGHT side of this argument for years. you’re a PATHETIC LOW IQ CLOWN.
YOU’VE BEEN ON THE WRONG SIDE AND STILL ARE.
peepee is so incredibly bad at math even now she doesn’t recognize that I WAS RIGHT AND SHE WAS WRONG FOR YEARS!
Not only were you wildly confused about regression for years but instead of being grateful for all my tutoring, you lie and pretend you were right.
You’re both STUPID and DISHONEST.
Sad.
oprah
gwen ifill
tracy chapman
rage at afro for not marrying a black woman
likes black women
strangely curious about the black white gap
quotes the movie Precious
extremely effeminate
strangely offended by the word “nigger”
thinks black lesbians are cool
can’t speak english
can’t read
black level narcissism
conclusion: peepee is NOT 100% aryan. peepee is a black lesbian.
“strangely offended by the word “nigger””
Bruh, what is strange about that?
in “strangely offended” the word “strangely” may modify the DEGREE of offended-ness.
it’s a quantitative adverb not a binary adverb the way mugabe uses it.
paraphrase of “strangely offended”:
1. offended in a strange way … strange in the LEVEL of offended-ness.
VS
2. that you were offended at all is strange.
mugabe meant #1. but melo thought he meant #2 because …
melo can’t speak english and needs to be deported.
it is NOT strange to be offended by the word “nigger” … even in online pissing contests …
BUT …
it IS strange to be offended to the degree peepee is when peepee has called herself a “white man”.
I’m not white.
but you said you were when you were in downtown toronto around prostitutes.
I did? I’ll have to look up that old article and check.
peepee also said one of her acquaintances (actually peepee herself) said “indians are white.”
but peepee isn’t even indian.
santo posted her picture.
she’s a dark skinned black woman with green eyes.
The DNA Test says I am 9% sub-Saharan African.
“it’s a quantitative adverb not a binary adverb the way mugabe uses it.”
You should probably make that more clear next time. My interpretation is a common one.
There’s a positive correlation between being a Grammar Nazi, and being Autistic.
That said, I don’t think Pumpkin has ever acted overly offended (this is the proper way to convey what you wanted) at the term “nigger.”
He censors it probably because he doesn’t want this place to emulate 4chan more than it already is.
cat, movie stories can have plot holes and still be good. Sometimes all plot holes cannot be filled in order to keep the story interesting or just 3 to 3 and a half hours and not more.
PP,
I found myself thinking of Oprah the other day, so I decided to make the most impartial estimate of her I.Q. that I could.
Oprah is the wealthiest black person in America. Assuming a correlation between I.Q. and net worth of 0.5 (similar to that between income and I.Q.) and that there are ~38 million American blacks, one expects Oprah’s I.Q. to be ~125 (further assuming a black mean of 85 and a standard deviation of 15).
I think that this figure is plausible given Oprah’s extremely middle class tastes. Oprah has (as far as I know) never said or written anything that demonstrated the unusually deep understanding or broad knowledge of the sort that I associate with ‘triple nine’ / 150+ I.Q. types (or even academics at a decent state school).
On the other hand, she’s clearly smarter than her audience of fat karens (I.Q. 100).
120-125 is probably a good estimate for the richest black Americans of all time, but Oprah not only had the biggest black account on Earth, but she also had ARGUABLY the biggest black brain on Earth, so she’s probably a lot smarter than the average billionaire of any race.
As for middle class tastes, she reads the Atlantic and was so impressed by the writings of a Harvard professor that she recently co-wrote a best-selling book with him about happiness. She was such a fan of The covenant of Water that she hosted an entire podcast series with the Indian doctor who wrote it. Very few middle class people would read a 700+ page book about Indian culture written by an Indian doctor, let aloe want to discuss it for hours, or would dream of turning a complex literary novel like Nobel Prize winning Toni Morrison’s Beloved into a movie (with Oprah in the lead role):
I understand she also promoted a lot of pseudointellectual crap & self-help pop-psychology trash, but that’s probably because she lacks formal education, leans slightly schiz, has a large verbal > math IQ gap and was a huge grifter pandering to an average IQ audience.
What part of Oprah don’t you get? Oprah is AA all the way. Literally you yourself admitted Oprah benefitted from AA to get her start in media.
If Oprah was say, east asian we would never even have heard about her.
No your God Obama was AA in all the way. Obama used AA to get into Harvard Law and built his whole political career around being the first black editor of the Harvard Law Review, even attracting Oprah’s endorsement in the process. He also had a father who attended Harvard.
The ONLY AA Oprah might have got was getting a job in news at age 19 and she was quickly fired from news and reinvented herself as the #1 talk show in Baltimore, Chicago and America with no AA at all, just moving into bigger and bigger markets through sheer free market success.
But even if she were an AA case like Obama, that wouldn’t make her IQ any less. On the contrary, the highest IQ blacks benefit the MOST from affirmative action because high IQ people by definition can exploit whatever opportunities they have. The conventional wisdom on affirmative action is wrong.
“If Oprah was say, east asian we would never even have heard about her”
If my aunt had wheels, she’d be a street car.
“. . . but she also had ARGUABLY the biggest black brain on Earth . . .”
How strong is the correlation between cranial circumference and brain size?
“As for middle class tastes, she reads the Atlantic and was so impressed by the writings of a Harvard professor that she recently co-wrote a best-selling book with him about happiness.”
Frankly, I’d call the Atlantic a middle class publication, but I think that you and I use the term differently. By middle class, I mean what most Americans call the ‘upper middle class’.
“Very few middle class people would read a 700+ page book about Indian culture written by an Indian doctor . . .”
Isn’t that a novel?
“. . . or would dream of turning a complex literary novel like Nobel Prize winning Toni Morrison’s Beloved . . .”
I haven’t read it, so I’ll refrain from judging its complexity.
“I understand she also promoted a lot of pseudointellectual crap . . . and was a huge grifter pandering to an average IQ audience.”
Her promotion of ‘The Secret’ was the worst of it, in my opinion. That, and the Eckhart Tolle nonsense.
How strong is the correlation between cranial circumference and brain size?
About 0.7 in adulthood. Even higher in childhood.
Frankly, I’d call the Atlantic a middle class publication, but I think that you and I use the term differently. By middle class, I mean what most Americans call the ‘upper middle class’.
Media preferences probably only correlate 0.4 or so with IQ, so if her IQ is around 140 (top 0.5%) than her tastes should be around +1 SD (top 15%) and if anything they’re probably a lot higher. Not only does she love sophisticated literature, but she eschews television to the point of not even wanting one in the room.
Isn’t that a novel?
Yes
“About 0.7 in adulthood. Even higher in childhood.”
Right. We simply don’t know Oprah’s brain size, although we do know her cranial circumference (at least approximately). It would be more honest, more scientific to estimate her I.Q. using the (very weak) correlation between cranial circumference and I.Q..
I chose her net worth as the basis for my estimate because a correlation of ~0.25 is virtually meaningless.
“Not only does she love sophisticated literature . . .”
Her literary taste seems middle-brow to me. She reads the sort of thing that my grandmother reads.
We simply don’t know Oprah’s brain size,
Well if we knew the height, width & length of her cranium we could make an extremely accurate estimate of her cranial capacity and I’ve estimated these:
although we do know her cranial circumference (at least approximately). It would be more honest, more scientific to estimate her I.Q. using the (very weak) correlation between cranial circumference and I.Q..
I chose her net worth as the basis for my estimate because a correlation of ~0.25 is virtually meaningless.
But even small correlations can have big effects. For every one SD increase in head circumference, IQ increases on average by 0.25 SD.
If all we knew about her was that she was the richest black on Earth, an estimated IQ of 125 would be reasonable, but since we also know she has roughly the biggest black hat size on Earth, 140 becomes our best guess.
Her literary taste seems middle-brow to me. She reads the sort of thing that my grandmother reads.
Did your grandma’s favorite author win the Nobel prize? Oprah’s did.
“Well if we knew the height, width & length of her cranium we could make an extremely accurate estimate of her cranial capacity and I’ve estimated these”
Fair enough, but given that each of the linear measurements would be an estimate, the potential error in the final, volumetric ‘measurement’ would be considerable. If each of the linear measurements were only 5% high, the calculated volume would be ~16% above the true value.
“But even small correlations can have big effects. For every one SD increase in head circumference, IQ increases on average by 0.25 SD.”
Yes, but even if we assume that Oprah’s cranial circumference is six SD above the black mean, her expected I.Q. would only be 1.5 SD above the black mean.
85+6*15*0.25 = 107.5
We could also assume a global mean of 90, a standard deviation of 17, and that Oprah has the largest (non-deformed) head in the world. This would still yield an expected I.Q. below 120.
“. . . but since we also know she has roughly the biggest black hat size on Earth, 140 becomes our best guess.”
That’s . . . a questionable inference, PP. I could just as easily say, “But since we also know that Oprah has been overweight for most of her adult life, 120 becomes our best guess”.
“Did your grandma’s favorite author win the Nobel prize? Oprah’s did.”
Anyone who thinks that Toni Morrison is a better writer than Borges or Nabokov (both famously spurned by the Nobel committee) is mentally defective. The Nobel has been a political prize since (at least) the 1980s.
Fair enough, but given that each of the linear measurements would be an estimate, the potential error in the final, volumetric ‘measurement’ would be considerable. If each of the linear measurements were only 5% high, the calculated volume would be ~16% above the true value.
It’s unlikely all three would be too high. Random error goes in both directions & thus tends to cancel out.
“But even small correlations can have big effects. For every one SD increase in head circumference, IQ increases on average by 0.25 SD.”
Yes, but even if we assume that Oprah’s cranial circumference is six SD above the black mean, her expected I.Q. would only be 1.5 SD above the black mean.
85+6*15*0.25 = 107.5
Yes, a black with Oprah’s hat’s size would be expected to be about IQ 108. And as you also noted, a black with Oprah’s money would be expected to be about IQ 125.
But black with BOTH Oprah’s money AND hat size would be expected to be about IQ 140 (assuming a 0.13 correlation between money and hat size):
85 + (0.44(5.2) + 0.22(6))(15)= 139 or roughly 140.
“. . . but since we also know she has roughly the biggest black hat size on Earth, 140 becomes our best guess.”
That’s . . . a questionable inference, PP. I could just as easily say, “But since we also know that Oprah has been overweight for most of her adult life, 120 becomes our best guess”.
You could and I’ve made more complex equation that included not only BMI, but also education, media preferences, height, religion, politics, etc, but since she’s most extreme when it comes to money and head/brain size, these will have the biggest impact on the expected IQ. The other stuff tends to cancel itself out.
Anyone who thinks that Toni Morrison is a better writer than Borges or Nabokov (both famously spurned by the Nobel committee) is mentally defective. The Nobel has been a political prize since (at least) the 1980s.
Considering 20% of the British public can’t even name an author of ANY novel, for Oprah to be such extreme Toni Morrison enthusiast indicates she’s way above average in literary taste, even if as she’s well below those who love Borges and Nabokov.
Pumpkin Person: I’ve made more complex equation that included not only BMI, but also education, media preferences, height, religion, politics, etc
I said before pp that you need to add more variables to that equation. Mugabe is right, Harvard is not a good school because the people there are selected for elitism. Bush jr. being the example at Yale of not a smart president. And Chris Lanagan with his supposed IQ of “200” voted for Trump which set him back considerably like it did me. Oprah also was way set back by your variables just not in the way expected. (no Ivy League schools)
Being mentally disabled I might have got the head size wrong on a lot of these people but it is also true that if you are smart and also not looking to make monies then your iq will be set back a lot as well.
Why are you describing yourself as mentally disabled in every comment now & why are you listing your IQ as only 93?
#@Pumpkin Person
It is in your equation where I entered all the variables provided by you. I think my cognitive resources had to shift because of the environmental pressures I was under.
The Wais 4 says I have a working memory of 75 and a processing speed of 75. That is why I think IQ tests have problems just like rr says they do. But I believe it is because of my mental illness and because of the way I use my memory system that I am the way I am.
I would like to know the progress you are making on the new IQ test you are developing. I think I got 132 on the puzzle test and higher on the picture completion test the second time I took it. right now I cannot take any more tests because of stress. I still am on psych meds.
My interest in Rushton’s theory got me interested in black people at a very young age & as a result I discovered some talented people. As for rage at Afro, I was just pointing out what I saw as his hypocrisy. But in retrospect that was not a good argument.
My birthday is [redacted by pp, 2023-12-28] please lemme post rap songs 4 the rest of the year!
Okay but no more than one per Iceland day. Anything more & it becomes spam. And try to give us some context as to why you like each one.
I will add my artistic critique and give you the bang 4 your buck!
PP, have you ever interacted with a black person at length?
I ask the question seriously, since I assume that you attended only good schools and have lived exclusively in high-income neighborhoods.
The only white people I know who like blacks have been insulated from them by wealth or geography.
I briefly attended an alternative school where I befriended a tall skinny super black guy. The first thing I did was administered the WISC-R and after adjusting for the test’s old norms he scored around 69. At first I thought he couldn’t possibly be that low but after he managed to get banned from subway for constantly changing his order, I realized the test was right.
When I returned to a quality high school, I befriended a popular super black jock who acted and talked like a robot because being around him was a great way to meet girls. His IQ was probably around 90 but he was very well behaved and his robot shtick was funny and all the white teachers and popular white kids liked to be friendly with him to convince themselves and others that they weren’t racist and I overheard one white girl say “he’so fucken gorgeous”.
I’ve also had some black co-workers, mostly hyper-selected African immigrants with charismatic personalities.
“The only white people I know who like blacks have been insulated from them by wealth or geography.”
This is basically describing everyone at Berkeley and that reads the NYT.
“The first thing I did was administered the WISC-R and after adjusting for the test’s old norms he scored around 69. At first I thought he couldn’t possibly be that low but after he managed to get banned from subway for constantly changing his order, I realized the test was right.”
LOL. Ganzir would love this story.
peepee should just delete the above as it proves she is a black lesbian. and she doesn’t want her readers to know that … i assume.
btw, oprah does NOT have a big brain!
*Her self-reported head circumference is 25.25″ (more than 6 SD above the U.S. woman mean).
*Gene Siskel claimed a hatter said Oprah’s was the biggest head he had ever seen
*Has hats custom made to fit her “big ol’ head”
*Two wigs had to be sewn together so she could have a wig in The Color Purple
*As a 22 year old news anchor who went bald because a French hairdresser thought you could perm African hair, she had to wear scarves cause no one could find a wig big enough to fit her.
*After losing a ton of weight again, people are STUNNED by how big her head is.
peeps love,
once i bought a baseball cap (a ladies baseball cap that is open on top) from a caribbean black island, for my sister. That cap was very big for her head and didnt fit even at its smallest size. And it is not like my sister has a small head. I was surprised caps meant for blacks were so big. do blacks in your country have bigger heads than whites? or i wonder if this is a Caribbean black thing what with a lot of freshly caught sea fish available to eat for the people there.
so at 3.125 SDs you’re being told that score of 2 SDs on test z is actually predicting a lower score for you than if you’d never taken test z, didn’t have a “green shirt”.
this is interesting.
because then the probability of scoring > 2 on z given a score of 3.125 on y is PHI(1.875) = 0.97.
in other words 2 is a very low score on z for someone who scored 3.125 on y.
because peepee sucks at math:
1. the SD of the conditional distribution of x given y is sqrt(1 – correlation^2) = sqrt(1 – 0.8^2) = 0.6.
so 3.125 – 2 = 1.125 must be divided by 0.6 = 1.875.
2. “standard multivariate normal” means all the variables have mean = 0 and SD = 1. this makes the algebra a lot simpler.
so at 3.125 SDs you’re being told that score of 2 SDs on test z is actually predicting a lower score for you than if you’d never taken test z, didn’t have a “green shirt”.
this is interesting.
I already knew that Mug of Pee which is why I said “among green shirts, b would probably be 0.6 or so because correlations are typically smaller in extreme scoring subgroups than in the general population because range restriction”
In other words, green shirts are regressing to a much higher mean than the general population, but at high enough enough extremes that’s negated by the general regression line having a steeper slope.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bosomy
How much do you use the word “bosomy”?
pumpkinperson
said:
December 24, 2023 at 1:57 am
…
Well, when X and Y are expressed as Z scores, a = 0 so in the general U.S. population it would be something like:
Y = 0 + 0.7(X)
Now among green shirts, b would probably be 0.6 or so because correlations are typically smaller in extreme scoring subgroups than in the general population because range restriction. Meanwhile, since green shirts were not selected for SAT scores we should expect them to score as high on the WAIS as they do on the SAT (i.e. +3 SD) assuming both tests have similar g loadings. To make this so, a would have to be 1.2.
So for this subgroup, E(Y) = 1.2 + 0.6X
WRONG!
So if E(Y) = 1.2 + 0.6X is wrong, what would the right equation be?
what are a, b, and c?
i’m not clear on what particular standard trivariate normal distribution you’re referring to…
a, b, and c determine such a distribution…make it unique.
what are they?
see above comment.
It’s common to express regression equations as Y = a + bX where a is the value of Y when X is 0 and b is the regression slope.
What is c supposed to be?
you’re not even reading my comments before posting them.
the correlation between…
x and y = a
x and z = b
y and z = c
The hypothetical question I asked did not provide enough information for you to infer all the correlations.
You’re overthinking it.
It’s not about doing any fancy math equations, it’s about having the common sense to understand that if criteria other than SAT scores still selects for high SAT scores, then people selected by said criteria are likely smarter than equally high SAT people selected by the SAT itself.
you’re underthinking it because low IQ.
you answered a very simple math question WRONG TWICE.
“you’re over thinking it” = the new “sadly”
sad!
The entire question is a red herring to deflect from the fool you’ve made of yourself.
Mug of PEE: “How dare you prove I’m an idiot! I’ll show you: What’s Y + A + B + C to the power of X to the power of Z and I’m not telling you what any of these variables are”
…it’s about having the common sense to understand…
do you have any clue how low IQ you sound?
“but muh selected n shit” = SHIT = IT ALWAYS EQUALED SHIT!
NOW YOU’RE JUST GONNA LIE ABOUT IT.
BECAUSE YOU’RE A LYING LIAR!
sigh
but drops for harvard students MORE than the correlation for the population as a whole predicts because muh selected n shit =
WHAT YOU SAID =
FALSE =
NOW YOU’RE LYING ABOUT IT…
BECAUSE YOU’RE A LYING LIAR!
More red herrings to deflect from the colossal fool you’ve made of yourself.
I never said Harvard would regress more than the SAT-WAIS correlation predicts; on the contrary, I used the degree that Harvard regressed to infer the SAT-WAIS correlation.
You’re the LIAR and you always have been!
also peepee has assumed every new commenter is black.
pill = black
misdreavus = black
santo = black
random personality = black
the only explanation is peepee is both a back narcissist and a self-hating black person.
Pretty sure Pumpkin showed his hands in that post he made about hot chocolate or whatever.
He looks pretty rice skinned.
My money is on PP being half Western European, half South Asian. His dad is probably some light-skinned chadpreet surgeon who scored a Dutch wife.
Bingo! Puppy keeps banning me saying the same thing.
if i had to guess the non-white side of peeps is middle-east in origin but she is christian not muslim. She herself said (if i remember correctly) her mom is german….so her dad must be middle eastern christian.
If looks could kill.
A vietnamese car https://www.cardekho.com/vinfast/vf6
Are vietnamese east-asian or south-east asian or a mix of both, peeps?
It’s in Southeast Asia so probably mostly Southeast Asian.
i thought south east asia is philippines, malaysia et al and east asia was upto hong-kong hence i was confused about vietnam.
Time reveals all. Remember how we didnt believe certain things long ago but now we do? Time!
We need 2 work hard until time shows us what truth is!
Self control is very important! It takes us places we never expect 2 get 2 and makes us wiser!
Mug is a very smart man! He self expresses a lot! Let him be!
And a good way to increase your self-control is to not keep an unwashed mouth for more than an hour anytime of the day. I discovered it myself.
More power 2 ya!
Anime-san, watashi o `thinking mouse’ to iu na no jikkyō-shada to omotte iru to itta koto ga arimasu ka? Soretomo watashi ga machigatte iru nodeshou ka?
Lets see if he is weeb enough to answer this.
I don’t know?
I am just some common American newtype that can use Google Translate.
Kitty, have you seen The Boy and the Heron?
unfortunately not
I don’t have money to buy anime.
after 2007 I just watched AMVs, reviews, and documentaries on anime.
@illuminaticatblog
Which is why I used the literal English text to test you and not the Japanese text which could easily be reverse-translated.
Anyway, the question was were you the dude who thought I was the same individual as the older commentator called “Thinking mouse” or am I misattributing that confusion to you?
Also, watch Jin-Roh: The Wolf Brigade.
You might be him, why the odd question?
I was wondering who made that comment. I find it interesting that he hasn’t posted ever since I started posting here. But more so than that, I didn’t remember who made the comparison, I thought it was you, but I wasn’t sure so I wanted to confirm if it was you who made the comparison.
There’s always cool stuff happening in the science community that doesn’t make it to the news but really should. Check out the goodnewsnetwork.org to see some neat things. Here are a few highlights:
1) a new stem cell injection that halts the progression of multiple sclerosis is in clinical trials
2) the California redwoods weathered the wildfires better than scientists expected and are recovering very well
3) the FDA approved a treatment that cures sickle cell disease
4) a complete stegosaurus fossil with skin still intact has been unearthed
5) NASA has developed technology for sending data transmissions much further than radio frequencies, and recently sent their first transmission 10 million miles away
6) scientists are going to start experimenting with lab-grown cooking oils, which could help curb a lot of the environmental damage caused by mass soy, corn, and palm oil farming.
7) scientists have created natural sponges that can soak up nanoplastics
Depends on what the end goal is! If its populating the planet with more people no thanks but if its something 2 the contrary could be useful!
They are different scientists from different places. I don’t think they have one single end goal.
Sure they do many of you have the same end goals youve been brainwashed 2 believe the same things!
4 the first song I wanted 2 post its called “13 Going on 30” and I think it resonates with me in many personal ways since it feels like just yesterday i was a young child but im becoming a young man! (Happy 28th birthday 2 me soon!)
I think the creativity behind this song and its sentimental resonant feeling is very deep and I think it creates a lot of tension between the listeners and the artist because it relies so heavily on being graphic yet poetic!
At first the artist believes the people he is close 2 gave up on him a common feeling in my life and a theme in the modern world….but then he admits 2 himself that he has made it and wants 2 embrace the people who disavowed him almost in a Biblical sense!
He says he’s been lied on and ridiculed but that he is focused on prevailing with or without those around him!
Then he reminisces about helping all those he did during the time his mother was in the process of dying!
He then says that he says what he does and that he stands 4 what he does and never gives up regardless of extraneous circumstances! In contrast 2 all the people in his life who talk big and never show up!
He says he gave them his life he gave them all him and thats the best thing anyone can ever do!
Very Stoic and beautiful! 🙂
Ban this person.
You dont understand reality though!
so again… but muh selected n shit…
for a standard trivariate normal distribution where the correlation between…
x and y is 0.80
x and z is 0.80
y and z is 0.80
1. what is the probability that x or y or both is greater than z given that z = 2?
2. does the distribution matter? is the answer the same if the distribution is not trivariate normal?
3. what is the expected/mean value of the next highest score given that z is the highest score and z = 2?
the answer (to the nearest 10%) to #1 is 40%. that is, x or y or both are > 2 40% of the time. can peepee obtain the cholesky decomposition from first principles?
peepee doesn’t have the math jargon n shit to answer #3.
but she might guess.
i haven’t calculated it yet.
so try! encourage the personalities to try!
to guess!
re-stated: you have a bunch of scores (x, y, 2), and you know that 2 is the highest score (and the 0.80 correlations n shit) …
what is the expected/mean value of the next highest score?
it is obviously true that those who decline harvard admission to do something even smarter (but there are no such pipo) may be like the person whose highest score is NOT z = 2.
but harvard drop outs might be another story …
like matt damon was accepted to harvard. so was bill gates. they both dropped out. did zuckerberg too? if such pipo weren’t so rare … one might expect them to be SMARTER than the avg harvard student …
but this is OBVIOUS …
this book should’ve had a chapter on peepee:
these harvard drop outs are the ones you HEAR about …
but maybe there are other harvard drop outs you DON’T HEAR about …
if harvard is your HIGHEST SCORE then OBVIOUSLY there’s a different regression line/curve …
IQ test question:
what is the expectation of x given y … given z > 2 and z is the highest score of x, y, and z and 0.80 and trivariate normal …
???
yes! gates and zuck and damon dropped out of harvard …
BUT!
what about all the trans height challenged hockey loving … pipo who dropped out and you’ve never heard of?
mugabe hypothesizes (unlike rr): the WAIS IQ of harvard drop outs has a much larger SD than of harvard students in general AND may even have a lower MEAN … or higher … BUT not that much.
I’m not even talking about Harvard students vs Harvard dropouts.
Both are part of the Harvard undergrad entering class.
My argument is that Harvard undergrads have roughly the same WAIS IQ as non-Harvard undergrads of equivalent SAT.
While getting into Harvard requires good grades and good breeding which are signs of IQ independently of SAT scores, scoring high on the SAT despite being a lazy student from a prole home is also a sign of high IQ, and so these factors cancel each other out.
As a result my guess is that Harvard students are neither smarter nor dumber than SAT champions who never attended Harvard.
dropping out of harvard is BALLS!
BUT!
I KNOW FROM THIS … (YIDDISHISM) …
MY DAD WAS OFFERED ALL THESE HIGH PAYING LAWYER JOBS FOR NO OTHER REASON THAN THAT HE’D GONE TO HARVARD …
HE SAID …
GO FUCK YOURSELF!
GFY!
for money!
peepee: just a faggot …
mugabe: when it’s homeless or butt sex AND you’re surrounded by … enveloped in … a society where … “going the gay way” = making money and being famous …
SOME guys … maybe MOST …
will go the gay way …
BUT they’ll still be into girls …
Although Russell continued to see other men and women …
peepee: BUT racism and sexism and trans-phob-ism and NEOLIBERALISM …
mugabe: GROW UP PEEPEE! it’s JUST NEOLIBERALISM!
arthur russell is the thelonious monk of gay disco =
1. BOTH only cared about the music. BOTH are “difficult” music … they didn’t care if you “got it” or not.
2. monk only got the approval of the man when he was 46. russell was dead at 40.
(check my calculations!)
few individual “artists” or “groups” have even one good song. russell has at least 6. very rare.
ALL THE VARIOUS IDENTITIES ARE CREATED BY CAPITAL …
IN ORDER TO DEFLECT ATTENTION …
FROM ITSELF …
WHAT IS BLACK? WHAT IS WHITE? WHAT IS GAY? …
NO ONE CARES!
ALL …
LIES!
LIES!
LIES!
long disco version …
not a faggot … a guy who did his genius anyway he could … and he SUCCEEDED!
men do what they gotta do.
true!
sometimes they even do faggotry …
sometimes they even do steve …
just kidding …
they never do steve!
sad!
HITLER LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOVED …
ARTHUR RUSSELL!
MUCH LIKE YE!
women want to say …
YOU’RE NOT JOHN WAYNE YOU FAGGOT!
and wymen kill themselves!
MUGABE@GABEKAPLAN.COM
the (((man))) has a small penis …
wymen kill themselves BECAUSE they believe in the system … like peepee …
john wayne would’ve LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOVED …
arthur russell …
i haven’t even gotten started yet. — The Searchers john wayne
————————
YUGE IQ TEST QUESTION …
1. why is arthur russell the monk of gay disco? (i laready said a little … but peepee may not post it.)
2. why does mugabe keep promoting this faggot who died from AIDS in 1992?
3. why would contemporary (sophisticated) neo-nazis and hitler-ists hold arthur russell in HIGH ESTEEM?
as jean-luc marion said …
THE TRUTH IS THE TRUTH!
but dropping out of harvard isn’t …
dropping out of harvard …
i mean … in the gates, damon, zuck, … case …
1. it began as temporary …
then they achieved such wild success that …
2. it became permanent.
where the fuck are my yuri gagarin posts?
it’s harder to find the disco version of Keepin Up than the best pictures version of the soviet national anthem …
say what you will about the cccp … but they had the best anthem …
if you disagree … then i know you’re a LIAR!
all wymen eventually look like tyson fury!
Irish travellers are very different from Roma or jews. I mean they are a lot closer to blacks in behaviour than these other nomads.
They literally have about 100 of these people like Bruno at the Max Planck institute. They give them a $20b budget and basically all they do is equations all day. Literally in 50 years these people have not produced anything.
Some of them are even neurotypical and still nothing much happens.
My guess is that Bruno is doing a lot of process type work in his job as well. People like Anime and Bruno have impressive IQ scores and the media is quick to say ‘smarter than Einstein’. Then you see the reality is that unlike Einstein or the jews in general they are lacking about 50% of the brain in the areas that matter.
I think they are doing a good job at what they are doing.
Technology takes time as the low-hanging fruit has mostly been picked.
That does not mean a lot more is not left to be discovered.
Even if I am emotionally weak it is not wrong to be that way.
I try really hard to keep myself stable where I am.
Einstein was 180 or so and he was really creative but to do extensive calculations he needed to be around his peer group. The 170 guy I know won’t talk to me so I am not sure about who.
When Einstien was asked who the smartest person in the world was he said: I do not know, you would have to ask Tesla.
I would prefer to be seen as like John Nash than Rainman.
Anyways my IQ is not a world away from Bruno however much he might dislike that. He gets very angry in his feminine way about me bashing autism. These silly snide remarks.
Look, ASD is not a superpower lol. You literally have WORSE judgement than normal. Even in technical fields. People laugh at you. If you weren’t so big, they would have bullied you.
I know the autistic mind inside it. Because (a) I have great intuition (b) I grew up with an autistic guy as my best friend and (c) reading about them.
Look, ASD is not a superpower
Tell that to Elon Musk
Musk has very very mild ASD. He has never been diagnosed by a professional. He self diagnosed.
How do you know he’s self-diagnosed? His eminent biographer describes him as “on the autism spectrum”.
Btw his son is severely autistic and his dad was an engineer.
We are all a world away!
He said it. He said he thought he had autism. He never said he went to a psychologist and got tested.
He has the sperg but its a lot less than Zuckerberg or Buffet. Sperg people don’t date Hollywood actresses, impregnate 5 different women and smoke weed in public radio shows.
smoking weed on Joe Rogan is exactly something a sperg would do in a desperate attempt to be one of the cool kids who were egging him on
Your IQ is a world away dumbfuck. You are NOT intelligent!
We are all worlds away from real intelligent and influential people!
PP is a worlds away from everyone he strives 2 be and Bruno is a worlds away from certain people. We all are!
Humble yourself and stop acting like this blog is your full time job!
I literally havent posted in 5 days dumbass. This blog is your life right now.
You are right loaded, there are people a lot smarter than any of us on this blog.
That does not mean we should fight with each other.
We can discuss things normally if we want to.
No I meant that you take this blog 2 seriously Pill. It’s just another internet forum you act like it’s the League of Nations or sumn.
Obviously Bruno is smarter than people like Melo and RR. At least Bruno knows theoretically what mass immigration from Africa would mean but he wouldn’t have the instinct me and Jimmy have. Whereas Bruno has to dig around for some book or paper….me and Jimmy just have to look at blacks and get the correct answer.
I look at Oprah and all I see is an actor.
Mugabe is obviously very very proud of his dad for getting into harvard. And I suppose he should be. Getting into Harvard in the 60s is a much greater achievement than getting in now, even though its harder for a straight white gentile these days.
You also get the long term degradation of the Ivy league under jewish rule….more ideology acceptants and less meritocracy.
You also have a long term issue that autism has increased maybe 5x or 6x compared to 100 years ago. So about 50% of people with IQs over 130 are going to have the sperg. Just like this comment section.
The sperg. The cold cold sperg.
You idiot none of you are as smart as you think you are! And your intuition sucks you know like five different things at most!
NEIN! you have autism!
harvard is only pertinent on hbd blogs. and peepee makes a big deal out of how harvard students are supposedly dumber because muh selected n shit.
otherwise i don’t give a shit.
my dad himself was very NOT proud of it. he thought harvard sucked ass.
“in terms of pure IQ” my mother’s father was the smartest person in the family but didn’t even graduate from hs and was a criminal. but HBDers don’t wanna hear that because INTRA-racial HBD = neoliberal econ = just another excuse for not taxing rich pipo.
I had an Irish traveller in my primary school class. Man he smelled. He was about 5 years older than everyone else but his academic level was about our level.
I have no idea what traveller IQ is. My guess is that its worse than white Irish catholics but I’ve no idea.
All I can say is that this guy was not like the other travellers at all. He was very quiet and shy. Which is the OPPOSITE of travellers. I felt sorry for his long term chances.
I was at a bowling alley once and about 20 travellers were in the lane beside me. Jesus christ that was intimidating. Theres always a strong chance they start a fight with you for no reason.
In Ireland we have people who have similar personalities to travellers in council estates for the poorest Irish. I mean these people are very stereotypical Irish. The women get pregnant at 15. The men start fights with people on the street and get into drugs and drink pretty quick. There is literally about 20% of the population in Ireland which is basically ‘white trash’ and the genesis for the hillbillies in America and the women who sleep with blacks. Its them fightin genes! Nature desired they fight and die quickly.
Rushton educated me more about whites than about blacks.
peepee doesn’t have the math jargon n shit to answer #3.
but she might guess.
the correct guess to 0.10 was 1.5 …
no more comments until peepee admits she is a black lesbian with a low IQ.
sad.
then when she admits this … no more comments.
sad.
Look there are a lot of strengths to autism not just IQ.
Excellent concentration. Excellent work ethic. Excellent memory. Very low chance of being arrested. Very low chance of mental illness or addiction.
Usually pretty robust physically with a lower chance of medical problems.
That being said I would rather be born a 100IQ neurotypical with a real brain than a 170IQ rain man person like Bruno.
pill if you just sit and think for a minute what you are saying. You want to say that autism makes people have hurt feelings very easily vs people who are violent and push people around. You keep insisting that Bruno has no backbone but that is not true. You just have not seen him get the chance to express who he really is if something important to him is at stake. When it comes to serious things he would not hesitate to fight and neither would I. You just don’t get it that people are not as naive as you think they are. I see you pill. You are not hidden from me what you are. You think you are a big person and that may be true but I do not think you would be if you got pushed by someone bigger. Don’t fool yourself into thinking people like Bruno and Pumpkin are not bigger than you are.
If you feel bad about the way your dad was then think about what you can do to feel better. Why is it that you have such a hard time dealing with kid things and why does it make you so angry with yourself? What makes video games fun for you and why do you not take showers?
also peepee would have to admit that all the commenters are her …
because LYING LIAR!
the correct guess to 0.10 was 1.50 …
When I was a child a traveller walked up to me and tried to steal my bike. So it became a tug of war over the bike and I suprisingly won.
My other memory is working in a video store and we had a fake tan salon in the back. Every time a traveller came, she would shit in the tanning booth and my female co worker had to clean it up. Man that was no worth the minimum wage.
Minimum wage in Ireland is very generous compared to America or Britain.
When Bruno said I didn’t even understand neoliberal economics….basically I would have punched him in real life if he said that to my face.
I have a degree in neoliberal econ. I know all the bullshit inside out. They marked my paper down if I ever was brave enough to suggest real economic answers or empirics. I even got a job in 2 central banks spouting the same nonsense in interviews.
These people marking my papers were autistic clowns and mindless retards like Bruno. They serve Master faithfully like Bruno serves Macron, who serves the French aristocrats. The aristocracy literally laughs at the stupidity of their servants and their autism.
You are right pill, I took an injection for 4 years because they said I had schizophrenia. but that is not Bruno’s fault or anyone’s fault who works in the system. They cannot even take care of themselves let alone us.
I was thinking about how Mugabe said my therapist can’t get me a real Job. I think the same is true of pill. – But I am going to try and make money in some other way. I need to fix my fence and my friend’s car. I hope you can find a hobby pill that gets you out of the house.
I might know neoliberal or ‘neoclassical’ econ better than most econ profs. Even the history of it and why is was promoted after the oil shock in the 70s.
Anyways the only useful econ I ever learned academically was a class I took in my master programme in Marxist econ. I got a perfect score in it and the professor accused me of plagiarism because he thought it was impossible someone could understand the dense language of it. Its not called Marxist econ in academia. Youre obviously not allowed teach communism. They have to call it ‘structural theory’.
But yeah, I learned more from that than about 100 hours of doing applied math in neoliberal econ for no goddamn reason other than ‘proving’ regulation and taxes on the rich are ‘bad’.
The french aristocracy are pretty mendacious people. They blackmailed Holland to appoint Macron as finance minister.
That being said French aristocracy is less oppressive or predatory than american or British aristocracy. I have to admit that.
Why has autism increased over the last 100 years?
They should study that.
Schiz has increased as well, but to a much smaller degree. And mostly because blacks breed a lot faster than whites or other races.
Schiz has no biological survival/reproduction relevance. There is no benefit to it unlike autism which is an ersatz eugenics programme.
I mean, Fosse, Joseph and Richardson 2015 showed that the CTM is invalid for schizophrenia research and doesn’t identify any kind of genetic effects of schizophrenia (and since the EEA is false, then that conclusion holds for all “traits” studied by twin researchers). This is what Jay Joseph has said for 25 years. Looks like he is right yet again. They aren’t “finding the genes” because… They don’t exist. His new book on schizophrenia should be required reading.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00062/full
“Extensive studies using linkage analysis, candidate genes, genome wide association studies [GWAS], copy number variants, exome sequencing and other approaches have failed to identify causal genes.”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165178123006418
susceptibility to stress is genetic.
when people talk to themselves in their head or visualize a lot this can create compartmentalization via trauma-induced functional rewiring of the system. brain regions start to operate independently of each other and create confusion between real and imagined stimuli. this fragmentation alternates between whichever strongest parts of the functional system are in control at any given time.
“susceptibility to stress is genetic”
Source?
Have you ever heard of the traumagenic neurodevelopmental model proposed by John Read in 2001 (and of course has been further built upon)?
I mean, one pillar of biological psychology has fallen (the serotonin-depression theory), and next (even though sufficient evidence had existed for a long time) is the genetic theory of schizophrenia.
I do not know how the amygdala factors in because it was not said in the article. The amygdala and the parasympathetic nervous system work together to control reactions that build up memory and body responses of how to respond to bad situations. Then this creates segments of compulsive drives of what to do in an instance where you cannot do anything but react in muscle memory. This is not completely understood where people form mentalities of unique psycho complexes. dysregulation of the integrity of such a complex would not be viewed as conditional to the impairment unless the exaggerated features showed in relation to a cognitive attunement to the environment.
I cannot remember phone numbers longer than 4 digits at a time or calculate sums in my head. I cannot draw things either.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traumagenic_neurodevelopmental_model_of_psychosis
You deny schiz even exists knucklehead so why would you post a retarded paper ‘debunking’ genetic basis for schiz. Everyone knows its genetic. Literally 99% of psychiatrists agree that its genetic.
I have the exact same paranoid schizotypal + OCD combo my mother has. She never ‘trained’ me to be like that. In fact me and my sister used to laugh at her as kids.
We know that the candidate gene era for schizophrenia was a bust, though. The gene-guessing can’t work. See Sullivan (2020), “How good were candidate gene guesses in schizophrenia genetics?” And the same thing will happen with GWAS. Mark my words.
Why has autism increased over the last 100 years?
Because the digital economy has increased the economic value of high quant IQ men making them more attractive to women and allowing their genes to spread at unprecedented rates (i.e. Elon Musk). This combined with feminism allowing high quant IQ women to meet high quant IQ men in places like silicon valley, and since many non-autistic math geniuses carry recessive genes for autism, when they mate the two recessive genes combine at rates they never evolved to combine at, creating an explosion of autistic kids which in turn creates more autism awareness & acceptance causing even more people to get diagnosed whether they have it or not.
You know for the first time ever, your sociological explanation for autism might make sense. But autists aren’t successful at making babies anywhere near the rate you suggest.
They don’t need to be. If the economy is making men who might be just outside the autistic spectrum (average computer programmer) more attractive to women, these men are more likely to have autistic children then the less nerdy rich men of previous generations. In the same way if basketball players started having more kids, we’d see a rise in diseases associated with height like giantism, even if none of the basketball players had it themselves.
What about a relaxation of the definition of “autism”?
Pill and peeps, along with what peeps said…. the trend of people having kids after 30-35 combined with them smoking and drinking (both men and women……as these habits increase mutations in their sperm and ova) also increased autism spectrum disorders among the children of these people if they carried recessive autism genes.
No, the number of diagnoses has increased.
You guys are fucking retarded.
peepee: but then you see 1.5/2 = 0.75 which is what i always said because numerology and low IQ and dunning-kruger as fuck and incredibly bad at math.
mugabe: just sad … and evil.
you need to check yourself into an insane asylum for low IQ black narcissism.
I have no idea what Loaded is doing here. I don’t even know how he found this blog. Maybe he was looking for pictures of naked black men and he found Mugabe and Afros comments?
Dude you only know five things calm down
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/dec/28/queen-of-trash-arrested-sweden-largest-environmental-crime-nmt-think-pink
Neoliberalism.
Bruno’s ‘sophisticated’ economic theory says this is the way an economy should function. LOL.
Puppy has the worst general knowledge in the comment section. I think autists have no curiosity outside of numbers and license plates so it doesnt suprise me.
“muh selected n shit” doesn’t apply to SAT scores at harvard, because they are only one of many criteria.
“muh selected n shit” only applies when one KNOWS that z is the HIGHEST score … so to say … of MANY.
so i have made more sense of peepee’s jive than she could ever have made of it by herself sadly.
harvard students’ SAT scores are NOT z.
the “crossing of the lines” would happen at IQs no one has … way above any in the prometheus low IQ society.
and that’s just 0.8 … what if …
for a standard trivariate normal distribution where the correlation between…
x and y is 0.80
x and z is 0.70
y and z is 0.60
so a set of pipo is given 3 tests …
group 1 is composed of those who scored highest on test 3.
group 2 is composed of those whose highest score was on test 3.
these are NOT the same groups in general!
so if there were a test “the harvard” AND the pipo who got into harvard were NOT the pipo with the highest scores on “the harvard” but those whose highest score of 1,000+ tests was on “the harvard” …
then muh selected in shit would be more true …
but still false.
that’s an interesting question actually …
suppose “the harvard” is not as g-loaded …
but it is your highest score in 1,000 g-loaded tests …
AND you’re in the top 5% at least … as most people never apply and thus never take “the harvard” …
all very interesting and just trying to make sense of peepee’s jive.
right … so mugabe’s theory is that … if g is real … then …
as the number of tests goes to infinity one’s single best score is as good an indicator of one’s ability as the average of one’s scores.
peepee: you sound crazy n shit.
mugabe: percentile of max{x1, … , x1000, …} —> percentile avg{x1, … , x1000, …}
in other words, smarter pipo will have a higher maximum score than dumb pipo.
if every test is a general factor + error, then if you have person A and person B and person A has a higher g than person B …
then as the number of tests goes to infinity the probability that the single best score of person A is less than the single best score of person B goes to …
0!
assuming the error has the same distribution.
i should’ve specified “the harvard” is more like “whatever your highest score is on 1,000 tests” than it is like one of 1,000 tests.
cue peepee saying …
you’re overthinking it sadly.
i don’t care anymore.
i’ve explained peepee’s jive to herself as well as i want to. but even then, it’s stupid.
Eating low-quality and low-carb diets based on meat may cause weight gain later on | Low-Carbohydrate Diet Macronutrient Quality and Weight Change
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/12/27/health/low-carb-weight-loss-over-time-wellness/index.html