
I find it interesting that after making hundreds of billions of dollars (on paper) running Tesla and SpaceX, the openly autistic Musk has shown nothing but incompetence since taking over twitter. First he buys the company for tens of billions of dollars more than it’s worth, and then naively thinks he can be a free speech absolutist in a company funded by advertisers in the most politically correct era in centuries, causing the sponsors to leave in droves and now his employees are leaving too. Smelling blood in the water, he is being persecuted by the media while his own fans are turning on him too and his net worth has declined by over $100 billion dollars since around this time last year.
Of course, on paper he remains the richest man on Earth but for how much longer?
Many bitter losers on the left are using Musk’s failure and as a chance to argue that meritocracy is a myth and the super rich can be as dumb as the rest of us.
But I don’t see Musk’s potential downfall as so much an IQ problem, but more specifically, an autism problem. When he was running companies like Tesla and SpaceX he could rely on his math IQ which is probably above 150, but twitter is a social media company, not a tech company. It’s all about making social judgements regarding how much free speech to allow, where to draw the line, how to deal with advertisers etc.
Intelligence is the ability to adapt. One psychologist (Sternberg?) went further and said (I’m paraphrasing from memory) “intelligence is the ability to adapt to your environment and if that’s not possible to change your environment and if that’s not possible, to find a new environment and adapt to it”
But Elon did the opposite. He was in an environment he was perfectly adapted to (technology) but because lower social IQ, got tricked into entering an environment that autistics are maladapted to (social media). Through legal maneuvering, liberals ripped him off to the tune of tens of billions and now have him cornered in their own backyard like a frightened rat.
In my opinion, the autistic mind maintains childlike neuroplasticity that allows it to adapt to new environments, which is why he’s good at creating green cars and going to Mars (both involve novelty). But metabolically it’s very expensive to have a brain that has enough connections to adapt to any new environment, so we evolved to prune neurons for events that were unlikely to happen anytime soon (going to Mars) and to strengthen connections for events we are likely to experience (social interaction).
But in the autistic brain this pruning process goes awry, which might be why Musk is struggling to adapt to Earth’s social rules, while perhaps dreaming of other planets where he might get his mojo back.
Elon Musk should have his face read. looks like a real trustworthy guy with some Aspergers variety of face traits there!
his social IQ is not that bad honestly. pretty bright guy but not very humble and stuff. probably more of a personality than a cognitive thing tbh.
i’m pretty sure she was margaret sanger’s granddaughter.
she looked like a nazi experiment.
sometimes natural blonds look weak or “elfen”.
one of the most beautiful women i’ve ever met.
the three schools which accepted me to heir PhD program in organic chemistry…they invited me to visit.
she was invited to two of the three too.
like giselle bundchen but way prettier.
you are blind Mugabe. she was ugly. would you tell your mother that you were seeing a very ugly deformed woman you thought was beautiful because you need better glasses?
also dogs are the worst animals. but i see your affinity for them….theyre like Nazis. DOGS ARE NAZIS!
and man o’ war should remind the pill personality that…
it’s NOT even clear that bolt is faster than paddock.
different track, different spikes, no blocks…
so the enormous expansion in the population of sprinters…should be like selection…
BUT!
it hasn’t been. not at all.
it’s NOT close to clear that that’s the case for the most elemental of all sports…
sprinting.
Pingback: Is Elon Musk too autistic to run twitter? – Glyn Hnutu-healh: History, Alchemy, and Me
I don’t know. I’ve always felt like estimates of his IQ have always seemed a bit inflated to me. People look at his successes like SpaceX and Tesla but ignore failures like Neuralink, the Boring Company, his compete inability to understand COVID and the engineering feats required to create respirators when hospital shortages were at their worst. I think people just want him to be better than he is. My dislike of Musk far predates him becoming the enemy of the Left and was even there when he was a liberal darling. It just seems like he has promised a lot and delivered comparatively little and unlike people like Bill Gates who have demonstrated individual competence in his field, Musk’s is mostly inferred or anecdotal.
I’m almost certainly wrong but it seems like consistency should be valued above peak score. The highest wealthIt reminds me of magic the gathering where people specifically talk about top 8s in tournaments before wins. I’m pretty sure I’ve also seen a study indicating that consistency in reaction time was more strongly correlated with IQ than raw speed. Wouldn’t surprise me if I saw it here, tbh.
I agree a lot with what you said; I think Musk’s achievements are both from being above average intelligent, incredibly productive (in terms of working a lot and taking risks), being open-minded, and focused at the same time. It’s kind of like Trump, who probably isn’t a super genius but he doesn’t really stop working and is constantly trying new things.
“I’m pretty sure I’ve also seen a study indicating that consistency in reaction time was more strongly correlated with IQ than raw speed.”
This makes sense to me, I see people who don’t seem particularly intelligent with good reaction time. It also seems like the most basic thing for an animal to have for survival, so probably isn’t extremely indicative of higher thought (or propositional attitudes). But it does make sense that more intelligent people might have more efficient and speedy neural wiring… it just wouldn’t always be utilized on outward reaction speed to specific stimuli.
Someone like Noam Chomsky is very intelligent but communicates like someone who just woke up with a hangover. I think there are a lot of examples of that kind of nearly dead genius type.
Chomsky might have talked quicker when he was younger. A lot of philosophy prof types talk soporificly. I have constantly criticised philosophy for not talking openly and quickly. There’s a conspiracy theory that philosophers talk slowly and opaqely to hide the fact they have nothing to say.
I must give it to Wittgenstein though. He talked openly a lot but it was basically about criticising the dictionary.
“Chomsky might have talked quicker when he was younger.”
Yeah I was thinking about that. Probably there is a better example. Maybe Sam Harris or Lex Fridman who are popular and seem intelligent but very slow and careful. Can’t think of a young non-jew like this right now lol.
“A lot of philosophy prof types talk soporificly. I have constantly criticised philosophy for not talking openly and quickly. There’s a conspiracy theory that philosophers talk slowly and opaqely to hide the fact they have nothing to say.”
One that comes to mind that pisses me off is Daniel Dennett, because I feel like I’ve seen him talk about consciousness and the “Cartesian Theater” but I had no idea what his actual conclusions were. That was over ten years ago though…
Then there is Jordan Peterson who is very obfuscatory on certain subjects, especially God and religion.
There is a genuine usefulness in taking the time to think things through obviously. But being slow and deliberate all the time is suspicious, because life throws both simple and complicated things at you, so to act as if everything is a complicated question doesn’t make any sense. (Someone like Peterson probably does that to show respect and consideration I guess).
Musk is legit. Puppy’s stupid criticism of him is based on the past 2 weeks instead of looking at his record over the past 20 years.
He was running engineering companies before. Now he’s running social media & can’t adapt because autism.
Everything useful has already been discovered but has yet to be invented. what i mean by this is that all useful things are already underway for completion in the near future.
i regard the imperative of the future as one that will see either a capitalization on the opportunities we have or a strong reaction to not doing so!
It’s extremely unlikely that Musk is suffering from Asperger’s disorder or any other form of autism.
Looking at what he did to some of his other companies like tesla where he outmaneuvered the previous owners is pretty obvious that he had keen social sense.
Most of what had happened with his twitter drama seems to be primarily the result of personality issues(like his pathological lying) and other mental issues(like depression)he is likely suffering from.