George Soros is part of the Silent Generation, one of the 58 million Americans born from 1925 to 1945. In 2013 it was estimated that Jews are 3.3% of U.S. adults, if Jewish is defined as having at least one Jewish parent or being raised Jewish, even if you now have another religion. Only 55% of this 3.3% is Jewish by religion.
We don’t know how many Americans were Jewish in Soros’s day, but in 1957, 3.2% of Americans 14 or older were Jewish by religion, and assuming even back then, Jews by religion were 55% of the Jewish population, then the total Jewish population was 5.8% of America.
Assuming they were also 5.8% of the Silent Generation, that’s 3.4 million U.S. Jews. Before giving away the bulk of his fortune in 2017, Soros was the second richest Jew in his entire generation behind only Sheldon Adelson, putting Soros at the one in 1.7 million level.
On a scale where all Americans average IQ 100 with a standard deviation of 15, White Americans average 102 to 103 (goes up with the very immigration Soros endorses) and an SD of 14.5 and Jewish Americans about 10 points higher than whites. The top one in 1.7 million is 4.87 SD above the mean on a normal(ized) curve so if there were a perfect correlation between IQ and life time earnings, we’d expect Soros to be 71 IQ points smarter than the average U.S. Jew so 113 + 71 = 184.
However since the correlation between IQ and life time earnings is “only” about 0.5, we’d expect him to be 113 + 71(0.5) = 149 which is about where I’d expect him to be based on listening to him talk.
Of course with a correlation this imperfect, we can expect a huge band of error around this estimate. For example, Soros is not just rich but exceptionally well educated so guessing his IQ from only money and race may underestimate him. But then most Jewish decabillionaires are highly educated so including this statistic was too redundant to justify the effort.
You can get a good sense of a person’s IQ by watching them on Charlie Rose because Rose asks complex g loaded questions that inspire his guests to rise to the cognitive challenge. Soros shows high IQ by predicting the internet would be as revolutionary as the printing press (I don’t recall many old people being that prophetic in 1995). He also says “that’s right” in response to many of Rose’s comments which shows he can quickly digest and evaluate ideas.
Pumpkin Person 
PP, did you just equate my I.Q. to that of Soros? I am insulted.
Sadly my estimate for you has gone down just because you scored mediocre on that picture test I gave you, but you’re still way smarter than most people here.
What was the picture test? I want to take it.
I would say Soros has pretty maximal iq. There’s no sense putting a precise number on it. He’s Jewish and a legendary financier. Look how right he got Russia in that interview! He basically described the Putin regime back in 1995.
Ganzir youre retarded compared to Soros. The IQ tests aren’t telling the full picture of intelligence. Youre mistaking a data point with reality. I’m sorry you have to hear this.
Ganzir youre retarded compared to Soros.
False, Ganzir’s IQ is 138, only 11 points behind Soros. And even that overstates it because IQ is normed for age & Soros is older than God.
The IQ tests aren’t telling the full picture of intelligence.
The good old school ones get pretty close; the 20th century Wechsler actually does give you a pretty full picture including aspects of social cognition. Soros is smart at making money, but Ganzir was able to get an important computer game than nobody has been able to play in 20 years and figure out how to run it on a modern computer. Soros probably doesn’t even know how to turn a computer on. Soros’s brain is well wired for a modern market driven economy, but if civilization ever collapsed, he’d be lost.
“Ganzir’s IQ is 138”
I’m considering permanently leaving your comments section now
LOL!
In fairness, if social judgment were factored into my composite score like the WAIS does in generating a Full Scale from indices, 138 might be accurate or even too generous
More abuse would be good, so long as it’s not idle 😉
“False, Ganzir’s IQ is 138, only 11 points behind Soros.”
PP, you do know your estimate is just for fun and combining statistical correlations doesn’t really give you his IQ, right?
It’s my educated guess
I don’t believe I, nor any reputable psychometrician, have ever claimed that IQ tests measure all abilities that fall under the umbrella of ‘intelligence’ in the colloquial sense.
Pumpkin, aren’t iq and standardized test scores more predictive for higher Iq groups such as Jews? Jensen found this to be the case. Whites’ iq scores are more predictive than those of blacks, that is to say, the sat/act actually OVERPREDICT black performance! Same between white/Asian, Jew/gentile, and even rich kid/poor kid. That is, if you have a kid from an affluent family and one from a poor family, if they have the same iq score, the rich kid is probably still smarter. My sat definitely overpredicted my life performance, lol!
How, specifically, did you calculate the number 138?
I figured on a comprehensive IQ test, your scores would range from average (social reasoning) to +3.33 SD (Arithmetic reasoning) and so on average you’re functioning at +1.66 SD. But since only about 0.5% of people can average in the top 5% across such a diverse range of mental skills, that puts you at +2.5 SD.
Autists aren’t just bad at social cognition. They can’t make theories. I’ve never seen an autist in any field come up with a good theory. Its like asking your PC why the Roman Empire disintegrated.
gibbon blamed christianity. but iirc he only wrote about the western roman empire.
what’s the pill personality’s explanation?
of course it never died. the pontifex maximus retained a lot of power until the reformation. and the roman church is still the largest institution on earth.
the eastern roman empire was conquered by idolaters, that is muslims.
sad.
Why are you obsessed with the papacy. As I already said in the last thread the catholic church has been totally irrelevant almost since the Reformation.
STILL WAITING for an answer to my question.
the papacy is no less irrelevant than the roman emperor.
Did you base that +3.33SD arithmetic reasoning estimate on my PATMA score?
That’s right. Although that might be an overestimate if reading my blog helped you solve the hardest question (frankly I don’t see anyone could have possibly solved the hardest question without some kind of statistical education)
Well, I solved it without having learned how to do it from your blog, and without any relevant statistical education (at that time; I’ve had more statistical education since then). I explained my reasoning in a comment here a while back. However, I was only about 75% sure that my answer was right, and I had an alternative answer based on very similar reasoning, so I guess my PATMA score should really be 9.75 rather than 10.
I’ll have to find that comment, because it’s hard for me to see any path to the right answer without knowing certain concepts like “percent of variance” and square root of that percent equaling correlation and it’s relationship to regression. Perhaps a sufficiently high intellect might be able to infer all this from the basics though, idk.
Incidentally, the second last question has turned out to be much easier than I originally thought, with even high school dropouts & the homeless often getting it right. In a way it has nothing to do with math but measures analogical thinking & working memory.
https://pumpkinperson.com/2020/08/27/update-on-patma-norms/#comments
Ctrl+F for “Alright, the”
I don’t know the answer to why the Roman empire declined. My knowledge of classical history is limited. All I know is that I would give a much better answer than the autist threesome if I were to look into it.
WOW!
the last time we ate together was at the gwo lee zhang restaurant…or
something genetically superior like that.
I quickly reasoned that, since height accounted for 25% of the variance in basketball, there should be a 25% difference in height between the best player and the average player, and another 25% difference between the average and the worst. The part I wasn’t sure about was: should that 25% be calculated over the entire range, yielding a difference of (12/4) = 3 inches from the average for each player, and a final answer of (3 + 3) = 6; or should it be calculated from the midpoint to the top or bottom, yielding a difference of (6/4) = 1.5, and a final answer of (1.5 + 1.5) = 3? The former seemed more ‘intuitive’ to me, so I guessed that and got it right, but I could have believed the latter was correct.
But just the term “% of the variance” suggests you benefited from statistical knowledge, either acquired on this blog or elsewhere. Of course maybe you might have figured that part out anyway since the question asked you to focus on one of four factors.
The part I wasn’t sure about was: should that 25% be calculated over the entire range, yielding a difference of (12/4) = 3 inches from the average for each player, and a final answer of (3 + 3) = 6;
But at this point in the reasoning chain, a lot of people might have just guessed 3 but you somehow knew to double the 3.
You don’t need a statistical background to know the word ‘variance’.
I knew to double the 3 because I am just that smart (and because I was lucky)
Fraz,
How do iq tests over-predict balck scores and those of poor-kids over rich kids?
“False, Ganzir’s IQ is 138, only 11 points behind Soros.”
PP, have you revised your estimate of my I.Q. subsequent to my 20 or so vitriolic rants?
I feel internally obliterated and barely alive. Despite this, I recently scored well above my average on a Pal Coogeman test.
“The good old school ones get pretty close; the 20th century Wechsler actually does give you a pretty full picture including aspects of social cognition.”
PP, I have to respectfully disagree with you here. There’s a point beyond which greater working memory capacity or increased processing speed is meaningless. What separates a really superior mind from a mere number cruncher is discernment, esp. with respect to the selection of goals.
Most of the high-I.Q. people I know are fat, sick, married to women they despise, and swimming in debt. They’re almost as disastrously lacking in good sense as everyone else.
I think your IQ is in the (mid) 150s range, above 149.
Why do you think that?
Your test results on this blog have been pretty high so far. You mentioned the picture completion thing- IDK about the results from that, but the other stuff like PATMA and verbal results as well as test results that you yourself linked from other places seem like they’d be 150+ (deep into 3 SDs above average range).
I love how calm Soros is. He definitely carries some trauma (unless he’s healed) from his childhood, though.
[redacted by pp, 2022-08-19] I’m telling you he has a higher IQ than Bill Gates. He came from nothing. Bill Gates came from an upper middle class family and was born in the US in its prime. His parents were highly educated and he had the best nutrition. Soros came from a war situation where jews were hunted down and even before that segregated. Theres just no comparison. He worked his way from being a bell boy at a hotel to probably the best hedge fund manager of all time and it wasn’t luck or insider trading as Mugabe claims.
He came from nothing. Bill Gates came from an upper middle class family and was born in the US in its prime. His parents were highly educated and he had the best nutrition.
And nutrition makes you smarter.
Soros came from a war situation where jews were hunted down and even before that segregated. Theres just no comparison. He worked his way from being a bell boy at a hotel to probably the best hedge fund manager of all time and it wasn’t luck or insider trading as Mugabe claims.
But he did benefit from Jewish privilege, and he never became a centibillionaire, while Gates became the first one in history, 20 years before anyone else & did so in a more g loaded field. Also, Gates just looks smarter Gates looks like a hardcore nerd, Soros looks like Liberace. Like you say, aesthetics don’t lie.
LOL programming is nowhere near as g loaded as hedge fund management haha. There are people with full blown autism – not talking about aspergers here – full blown autism that do well in programming.
“he never became a centibillionaire”
Yes he did Puppy. We have a concept in economics called ‘inflation’. Look it up.
“Gates looks smarter”
No he doesn’t. He looks like a loser. When I think of an intellectual person, Soros would fit the stereotype.
LOL programming is nowhere near as g loaded as hedge fund management haha. There are people with full blown autism – not talking about aspergers here – full blown autism that do well in programming.
That could be because programming is more of a meritocracy so they’ll hire you regardless of social grace, while you probably have to be social acceptable to even enter the hedge fund profession. That doesn’t mean programming is intrinsically more autistic.
Yes he did Puppy. We have a concept in economics called ‘inflation’. Look it up.
Even inflation adjusted he never came close Gates’s level of wealth.
No he doesn’t. He looks like a loser. When I think of an intellectual person, Soros would fit the stereotype
There’s a difference between an intellectual and a super high IQ mind. If Soros walked into an advanced calculus class at MIT the professor would be like “Hey Queen, hey Liberace, I think you have the wrong class. Queer studies is that way.”
If Gates walked in:
“Have a seat”
Think about it from your own chronometric technique. If jews are a standard deviation about gentiles and Soros is a jewish cognitive elite, he’s probably an SD about Gates who is a gentile elite.
Except Gates being a super nerd overrides the usual jewish > white IQ gap. Being a super nerd is like the high IQ version of having Downs Syndrome.
peepee thinks smart pipo look like losers because looks like a loser.
the evidence from the terman study is those of the highest IQ are more robust, taller, better afaletes etc…
but having a very high IQ also usually means not having an autistic obsession with anything…and such an obsession is often required to make a great fortune ala gates and buffett.
gates and buffett have high IQs. BUT if their IQs were even higher they wouldn’t be as rich.
ACTUAL genius jewish hedgie = jim simons.
Yeah Simons is also very smart. Theres no doubt about that. Simons is said to be the best hedgie of all time on a risk adjusted basis (i.e Sharpe) but I disagree with that concept because risk isn’t a risk if you know what you’re doing like Soros.
Simons also seems to rely on his team a lot more than Soros. Soros made big gambles that paid off using his own acumen whereas Simons has like 200 people around him writing software that basically just does micro-arbitrage in real time. I wouldn’t compare the two styles other than to say Soros came from nothing and Simons had a much better head start in life.
If you think programming is more g loaded than hedge fund trading youre stupid and don’t know whats involved. Did you know modern hedge fund trading includes programming as a subset skill too?
You can’t be autistic and be a macro trader. You could probably be autistic and be at some sort of quant fund but if you look at all the top quant funds none of the partners seem to be dripping of autism like your typical FANG programmer.
And inflation adjusted he is comparable to Gates.
And inflation adjusted he is comparable to Gates.
How do you figure? In 1996 Soros was worth $2.5 billion. That’s $4.7 billion in 2022.
By contrast Gates was worth $100 billion in 1999 which is about $178 billion in 2022.
https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/
Though Soros has the distinction of being the first American to make a billion dollars in a single year.
Soros was worth at least $32b in the early 90s before he gave his money away. Thats in the wiki profile. He stopped actively managing money in the 90s.
Gates stock was notionally worth $100b in 1999 (at the exact height of the tech bubble which is a distortion) but he would have to liquify it meaning a massive hit and taxes. Soros already had $32b in liquid assets in his bank account.
Frankly I think Soros knows a lot more about managing money than Gates and probably hid even more in tax havens.
Soros was worth at least $32b in the early 90s before he gave his money away.
Are you crazy Pill?
The most Soros has ever been worth was $25 billion and that was not until 2017, right before he gave most of his money way:
https://www.forbes.com/profile/george-soros/?sh=7177ee1b2024
Nobody was worth $32 billion in 1992. Even Gates only had around $6 billion back then and he was the richest person in America
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1992-10-05-fi-467-story.html
WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT, PILL?
I’m not even sure Soros had even $1 billion until 1992 when he earned 10 figures in one month shorting the British pound.
Jesus christ puppy it says it literally in the first line of Soros wiki page. Durrr!
It says:
George Soros[a] HonFBA (born György Schwartz, August 12, 1930)[1][2] is a Hungarian-born American[b] businessman and philanthropist.[8][9] As of March 2021, he had a net worth of US$8.6 billion,[10][11] having donated more than $32 billion to the Open Society Foundations,[12] of which $15 billion has already been distributed, representing 64% of his original fortune. Forbes called him the “most generous giver” (in terms of percentage of net worth)
How does that make him $32 billion in the early 1990s? He never achieved anything close to Gates money; get over it.
LOL! Obama peed all over George Soros.
Poor pill.
“They pissed on him,” a confidant says. “He didn’t want a fucking thing! He didn’t want a state dinner, or a White House party—he just wanted to be taken seriously.”
https://www.businessinsider.com/george-soros-obama-pissed-on-2012-8
Imagine being peed on by the most respected President ever.
Meanwhile the brilliant Oprah & Bill Gates got medals of freedom.
Maybe I have aspergers like you since I get sadistic pleasure out of rubbing this in your face. Grim sadism is an aspergers trait
He donated at least 32b since stopping trading in the 90s…therefore he had $32b after he stopped trading in the 90s. LOL
Poor puppys math IQ is maybe not as strong as he thinks.
PS Who fuckin cares who Obama gave the medal of freedom too. Do you know Joe Biden also got a medal of freedom from Obama. It means nothing.
He donated at least 32b since stopping trading in the 90s…
No he didn’t. You’re very confused.
99% of people who read this comment thread will see what I mean. I’m worried youll just censor anything I’ll say next to ‘win’ the debate like you always do.
No 99% see you’re full of shit. I only censor when it gets too tedious to respond to your nonsense or when you’re especially undiplomatic.
Peeps,
”That could be because programming is more of a meritocracy so they’ll hire you regardless of social grace, while you probably have to be social acceptable to even enter the hedge fund profession. That doesn’t mean programming is intrinsically more autistic.”
Still hedge-funding is more g loaded.
”Except Gates being a super nerd overrides the usual jewish > white IQ gap. Being a super nerd is like the high IQ version of having Downs Syndrome.”
How and why? Are all/most of the high IQ people nerds?
soros came from a rich family peepee the mossad agent who can’t read.
Soros was born in Budapest in the Kingdom of Hungary to a prosperous non-observant Jewish family, who, like many upper-middle class Hungarian Jews at the time, were uncomfortable with their roots…
why does the pill personality know less about soros than can be learned from reading the first sentence of his wiki?
Did you mention the part where Hungary fought with the Axis in WW2?
soros was how old then?
he never fought with the axis. he was part of the SS basically. he
expropriated jews and he said, “i enjoyed it.” plus he has said, “i am God. i’ve always thought i was God. my life confirms it.”
so i’m thinking narcissistic psychopath + high IQ BUT != genius.
hungary and the holocaust is interesting. the official story is after half its jews had been deported the puppet government said “no mas” and it stopped.
it was only in countries governed by the SS where the holocaust went to completion.
The hungarian government wasn’t a puppet government. They pretty much willingly liquidated the jewish population. Thats what Soros and his ‘upper middle class family’ was up against.
Maybe Soros is a psychopath who knows? Frankly that wouldn’t surprise me as I make the assumption that most jews are psychopathic.
I respect him as a genius just like Freud or Marx or other jews. You seem to think that means I like them which i simply do not.
^^^LIAR^^^
OR
^^^RETARD^^^
at this point i’m not even sure if pill knows more about HIMSELF than i do.
sad.
remember that 300lb first nations trans woman midget who kept coming on to the pill personality and obviously had a yuge crush on trump?
that was truly sad.
There is a series of dialogues between two high-functioning, high-IQ Jews (Ashkenazi) and a high-functioning, highly intelligent Brahmin. A YT search for “Bohm, Shainberg, Krishnamurti” will pull them up. The introduction to the series is okay, but the dialogues themselves are more revealing of the intelligences at play. I would be interested in your estimating of the IQs and the types of intelligences at work, and how you arrived at the estimates.
Jiddu Krishnamurti was a fraud launched to stardom by the deranged faggot Leadbeater. U.G. Krishnamurti was the real deal – a brahmin by both birth and merit.
You know what would make Donald Trump the greatest president in modern American history?
If they banned him from running and he lost his temper and started saying the jews control everything.
That would make him the most consequential president since FDR.
I think theres a decent possibility he could lose his temper like that and tell everyone who the globalists are.
He’s the last person who would do that. You seriously have aspergers if you still haven’t realized what a Zion worshipping cuck Trump is.
I actually don’t know what Trumps personal opinions on jews are. Maybe he doesn’t know for sure. His lawyer Michael Cohen and his niece said Trump has anti-semitic opinions. We also know Trump’s longtime butler and ‘family historian’ is a raging anti-semite.
On the other hand he seems to like Kushner and is publicly supportive of Israel, possibly for the crude reason that he hates muslims and considers jews ‘white’.
Anyway, hes more socially intelligent than you or me so he would have figured out by now all his deep state enemies are ashkenazi jews and that they don’t seem to care how pro-Israel is.
Maybe if Sheldon Adelson were still alive he could broker something with Rubin but he’s not.
You have to understand just how sensitive the need for calling someone antisemitic is.
He was called antisemitic for noting that Jews are really into business, or for just stating obvious racial stereotypes. And Trump being a moron means he would be crass about it, resulting in perhaps an irrational feeling of offense.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2022.963568/
That is all.
I emailed the author
Let me know how it goes. Here’s an article where the author talks about the study a little bit more:
https://www.haaretz.com/archaeology/2022-08-17/ty-article/new-paper-debunks-shocking-theory-that-our-brains-shrank-3-000-years-ago/00000182-aacc-d14d-abfb-aaee52f50000
no you didn’t.
Melo do you still think Trump is a Russian spy?
Do you still enjoy eating cum out of your wife’s pussy?
scott adams is a genius.
just listen to him talk.
Puppy says Scott Adams has autism LOL.
Adams is probably one of the world’s leading experts in psychology….
The Dilbert cartoons are great too!
^^Autism^^
Melo, my guy. How are you? It’s been a while.
Doing good man. How about you? This may seem a little off topic, but with the recent Roe v. Wade decision by the SCOTUS, I’m curious as to what would you say are the best arguments against anti-natalism that you have? Im pro choice btw.
I’m doing fine. Having a baby in November.
I know of a few arguments against Benatar, but I his arguments are valid but I don’t recall the soundness of his arguments. I need to read into it again. I’ve neglected that. I’ve been reading more philosophy of mind and behavior genetics lately.
Anyway, now that I have personal (lived?) experience with having a pregnant girlfriend, I would say that it is her body and her choice on whether or not to abort. BUT she would HAVE to ask me what I would think before she made the decision to abort (if she would, she isn’t and we’re like 23 weeks now). Even if I said “No, don’t abort”, would – or should – that have any bearing on her decision for what she does with the baby?
By “best arguments against anti-natalism”, do you mean against Benatar specifically or just arguments in favor of having children as opposed to not having children?
One more thing: I came across this paper on Phil Papers last night while searching for some things to read on the afterlife. I came across this one paper called “Will there be races in heaven?” where he argues that racial identities should be preserved in heaven.
However, Drange’s “nonidentification” argument establishes that it is incoherent since without bodies there are no way for people’s identities to be established.
1. Bodiless people would have no sense organs of any sort.
2. Therefore, they could not feel anything by touch or see it hear anything (in the most common senses of “see” and “hear”).
3. Thus, if they were to have any thoughts about who they are, then they would have no way to determine for sure that the thoughts are (genuine) memories, as opposed to mere fitments of imagination.
4. So, bodiless people would have no way to establish their identities.
5. Also, there would be no way for their identities to be established by anyone else.
6. Hence, there would be no way whatever for the identities of bodiless people to be established.
7. But for a person to be in the afterlife at all, it is conceptually necessary for his or her identity to be capable of being established.
8. It follows that a totally disembodied personal afterlife is not conceivable.
Say, there would no way for me to be identified in an afterlife over you, since we are disembodied. So this would then undercut the “will there be races in heaven” argument. The only way it wouldn’t undercut it is if there is bodily resurrection along with the transmission of the soul to heaven.
Are the supreme court justices russian spies too? Or is it only nationalists and patriots that are russian spies?
“Having a baby in November.”
Congratulations!!!! Damn, I remember when you were adamant that you weren’t going to have children. I’m glad you changed your mind.
“I’ve been reading more philosophy of mind and behavior genetics lately.”
Anything interesting?
“do you mean against Benatar specifically or just arguments in favor of having children as opposed to not having children?”
The latter. I vaguely recall you being more pro choice in the past and in my head abortion is just necessary murder. I’d probably be “more pro-life” if we had the necessary social safety nets to guarantee that the child would have a good life. To me it’s a sealed deal but I recalled that you used to post pro life logical arguments and was interested to see if any of them may be able to persuade me. I didn’t pay much attention to them in the past.
” without bodies there are no way for people’s identities to be established.”
Interesting. Are you still a dualist?
“I’m glad you changed your mind.”
I remember saying that years and years ago. Afro told me the same thing when I told him. It kinda just happened in March, we didn’t plan it. I was iffy about it and in denial but now I can’t wait to see my kiddo.
“Anything interesting?”
I’ve been reading more on souls, the afterlife (Neuroscience and the Soul, The Soul Hypothesis), and critical outlooks on the afterlife (The Myth of the Afterlife). When it comes to BG, just regular stuff, nothing too interesting as I feel the field has been stagnant for years with no new discoveries. But I did just buy Whats Normal? Reconciling Biology and Culture (it’s pro-BG).
“The latter.”
Christine Overall’s Why Have Children: The Ethical Debate is good. This is a good overview on pro-arguments for having children.
https://philosophicaldisquisitions.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-ethics-of-having-children.html?m=1
I agree that if it is ensured the child could have a good life then it is a good thing to be pro-life. I used to be very against social safety nets and the like but over the years I’ve come around to it.
What you’re talking about is where I provided Tooley’s argument where it is ethical to kill newborn babies and animals on the basis that it is not wrong to kill them painlessly since they cannot want anything, specifically their continuance as subjects of mental states. And the pro-argument was Marquis’ future like ours argument where it is wrong to kill a healthy fetus since it causes the loss of their future.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2018/11/19/an-argument-for-and-against-abortion/
I don’t think that a fetus is a human person, as I feel that we become persons through our interactions with each other and society at large. I do look at a kind of “potentiality” of human fetuses to eventually become human people. That’s one reason why I think abortion is wrong. I might try to formalize my potentiality argument one day and argue for it at length. Maybe at the end of the year I’ll do this.
“Interesting. Are you still a dualist?”
Yes. While I do think we have immaterial minds, I don’t think a disembodied existence is a logical possibility. We establish our identities with each other, first and foremost, based on what we look like. So, to other people, when they first see us our “personal identity” to them is physical (what we look like). Our bodies make it possible for identities to be established, obviously, since we interact in a physical world and have physical bodies. Though our bodies cannot be identified as being subjects of experience, that is the “self”, “I”, who is the bearer of mental states. We aren’t identical with our bodies but our bodies are needed to identify us, if that makes any sense. The bearer of mental states in Lowe’s non-Cartesian substance dualism is “I” – the self – and not my body, although my body is a necessary pre-condition.
I’ve been very lazily writing something on why psychology can’t be a science and it can’t be a science because of the irreducibility of the mental. I am also tying in hereditarian arguments into it, as I have come to the conclusion that new age hereditarian research is a kind of mind-brain identity.
What about you? You read anything good lately?
The Overall book has pro-arguments but the linked article is negative.
Some argue that we shouldn’t have kids and that if one wants kids there are millions of kids to adopt.
https://philpapers.org/rec/RULTEO
This paper argues against people wanting a genetically similar child, arguing that the arguments against adoption for children fail.
https://philpapers.org/rec/RULPAG-3
Smilansky argues that some people are under a moral obligation to have children to raise them.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/24354037
And a I just found this article on the argument from fetal potential.
https://peh-med.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1747-5341-2-7
Here is Marquis’ future like ours argument. (Though there is some pretty significant criticism of it.)
https://home.csulb.edu/~cwallis/382/readings/160/marquis.html
Here is an interesting paper arguing for the nonparental care of children.
https://philpapers.org/rec/GHEAFN
The ethical debate about the morality of having children is interesting and important I think, if what people say about overpopulation is true.
I think it’s great that you’re having a kid. It will be a ton of work in the short-run but you’ll be happy when you’re old to have someone to help take care of you or at least keep you company. I regret not doing so myself when I had the chance.
Few things in life are more important than family which you know as an Italian. In fact I would try to have more than one while your sperm is still young. But why no marriage? Was this even planned? Hopefully the mother doesn’t have bad genes.
“I think it’s great that you’re having a kid. It will be a ton of work in the short-run but you’ll be happy when you’re old to have someone to help take care of you or at least keep you company.”
Yea I know. I was nervous at first but now I’m excited and I can’t wait to see him. Someone to take care of me when I’m older wasn’t on my mind and is irrelevant seeing as I will be in top condition when I get older and I don’t expect to need people to take care of me in old age, if I can help it.
“Few things in life are more important than family which you know as an Italian. In fact I would try to have more than one while your sperm is still young.”
Yea I want a few more. But I would want a few more since I wouldn’t want to be that “old dad” and would want to be there to see a lot of my kids life. The sperm quality is far from my mind and is nothing I really think about.
But why no marriage? Was this even planned? Hopefully the mother doesn’t have bad genes.
I’m not ready to get married yet. Kid wasn’t planned but both of us make good money. What do you mean by “bad genes”?
i can’t believe rr found a woman who would lay down for him.
rr is pro-abortion for wybabies, anti-abortion for mulatto-babies.
sad.
peepee is very dark skinned for a mulatto.
sad.
“I can’t wait to see my kiddo.”
That’s awesome, man, and I’m really happy for you. I have no doubt you’ll be a great father. I just turned 26, so I’m trying to find that special person to have some lil meLos with.
And I appreciate all the links and stuff. I’ll go through those when I get the chance.
“You read anything good lately?”
I’ve been reading Rethinking Consciousness by Michael S.A Graziano. Also been reading The Sasquatch Genome Project, A failed DNA Study. Hilarious book; you should check it out when you get the chance. But, you may not find it as humorous, considering you aren’t as deep into Anthropology as I am.
Other than that, I’ve been learning a lot about IT lately. Built my first PC in January. Learned a little bit of SQL, PHP, HTML, and CSS. I’m learning Python right now, and I created a Minecraft server on a virtual Ubuntu Linux OS. Inflation has basically fucked my business in the ass, but my brother has this PC creation and repair business idea, so I may transfer to that. Either that or real estate, because that’s the obvious progression but that may be too saturated in my area. Do you still own your own gym?
The idea of Melo reading anything is hilarious.
This is ironic, considering you wont even read the Mueller report, despite believing it corroborates your claims.
Melo you are 26? you are so fucking mature wow. i am also 26 have been since the beginning of the year and i am still so immature. i legit thought you were in your 30s.
Loaded how old are you?
He just said he’s 26
I guess I missed it because I assumed he’s younger based on the way he talks/interacts.
Appreciate it. A lot of people tend to think I’m only like 20 because my “asianess” gives me a baby face.
Maybe he was referring to his IQ
oprah’s head looks yuge in this picture.
Does your mom know you share her photo online?
PP, do you have a ‘thing’ for black chicks?
No shame, dude. I dig high yallers myself.
I just like women. Women of all races are attractive enough to reproduce or they wouldn’t be here.
I read a study where it said about 40% of people in programming had some signs or full blow autism.
That sounds exactly like a field someone like Bill Gates would excel in!
TDS can only be explained by hatred of the identity group to which trump belongs.
namely, if a person is:
1. white (gentile)
2. straight
3. over 6′ tall
4. not autistic
5. not a mangina
the odds that such a person has TDS are very very very LOW.
who predicted TDS?
and…
milo.
milo: the end of idpol is that the one group which was theretofore hated by all other identities wakes up and starts defending itself…and you’re gonna lose.
and…
langan agrees.
sad.
You don’t need a theory to explain why people hate Trump. He’s arguably the most narcissistic, bigoted, dishonest, perverted, tasteless, tacky and ignorant man to ever occupy the White House. The real mystery is why a third of America loved Trump. How is it that such a repulsive creature inspired such a loyal following is what pundits will struggle to understand for decades.
“How is it that such a repulsive creature inspired such a loyal following is what pundits will struggle to understand for decades.”
This is the exact analysis an autist would say. Autists just totally don’t get why Trump is appealing to human beings with feelings and instincts.
I get the appeal, I just said the appeal is what requires explaining. Mug of Pee felt the hatred is what requires explaining when that part is obvious.
i apologize. sincerely.
the first rule of fight club is: “when trying to communicate with a gay man use a gay icon if possible.”
the point of the papacy is:
gates was asked “are you a nerd?” and his response was “if a nerd is someone who cares passionately about one thing then yes.”
my point is pipo of the very highest whatever you wanna call it are “men of parts” or women.
that is, we live in an age of the specialization of labor and this is painful to very smart pipo. because there are so many other things they could be doing which turn them on.
like…the difference between a high IQ and a very high IQ is NOT genius level ability at anything…
it’s being very good (but not genius) at many things.
which is actually rarer than being genius at any one thing.
see: scott adams “talent stack” and your own experience. trump has a better “talent stack” than any politician alive today.
this is a consequence of the very idea of g.
Nerds care about lots of topics; you’re confusing nerds with autists. And many high IQ people are good at only some things. As long as the overall cognition is high, the IQ is high, regardless of whether you’re well rounded or specialized
Puppy would say Leonardo Da Vinci was an idiot compared to Bill Gates since artistic ability isn’t on the IQ test and therefore doesn’t exist. LOL
No I wouldn’t say that. IQ tests are to intelligence as polls are to public opinion. They’re samples.
I don’t think any of those things are reasons for why people hate Trump. Hell, people still love Bill Clinton. This moral preening always feels off-base to me; very disingenuous; sure, there is a real evocation of distaste or disdain, but it’s definitely influenced by what he represents.
Initially I found Trump distasteful, and still do, and admittedly I shoved that aside because I agreed with what he represented. I don’t like Trump now because he’s obviously an idiot; he only knows how to self-sabotage because he is an idiot; and now all of his negative attributes come to the forefront and influences my dislike further.
If Trump was 70% of what the left feared, I would turn a blind eye; and that is the rational thing to do when you want to see a certain outcome.
“How is it that such a repulsive creature inspired such a loyal following is what pundits will struggle to understand for decades.”
PP, the explanation is simple. He’s the archetypal American: loud-mouthed, stupid, fanatical, gutless, crass, talentless, and obese.
Trump is the end product of centuries of Protestantism. What is Protestantism? The rejection of everything Greek (rational, humanistic, dignified, healthy, sane) in Catholicism.
Every Elmer Gantry in the country stood behind the son of a bitch.
Compare Trump to Martin Luther.
Both obese, egotistical, illiterate, back-stabbing, fault-finding, cowardly madmen. Both have cynically betrayed their own most devoted followers to save their own sorry skins. It’s probably no coincidence that they have the same bovine Bavarian physiognomy.
Neandercel must be in some sort of catholic cult group.
it would be nice if it were possible, but does human nature allow it?
mugabe: no. it doesn’t. multiethnic, multi-religion societies can’t work…in the long run…unless there is one ethno-religious group like the WASPs/episcopacy (or jews per peepee) which governs all the rest…no such group = disaster…
but unlike the jews the northeastern establishment never LIED about who they were or SILENCED pipo who mentioned them.
it was taken for granted that the american elite were mayflower northeastern episcopalians…
because…autism/IQ question why? there are 3 big reasons.
1.
2.
3.
Puppy did you know Microsoft’s other founder might be more impressive than Gates.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Allen
Perfect SAT score.
But had to curtail his activities since 1982 due to lymphoma.
those SAT scores on the internet are bogus.
i do believe they both had high scores. just not that high. for one thing such scores were so rare that they also required some luck.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Microsoft
At least Soros didn’t sexually abuse his employees or threaten to sue them if they left the company. Gates was an objectively horrible boss.
I don’t think donating billions to Africa makes up for bribing congresspeople to not tax mega corporations. Gates is a sick man.
“Microsoft was the first company to participate in the PRISM surveillance program, according to leaked NSA documents obtained by The Guardian[107] and The Washington Post[108] in June 2013, and acknowledged by government officials following the leak.[109] The program authorizes the government to secretly access data of non-US citizens hosted by American companies without a warrant. Microsoft has denied[110] participation in such a program.”
This isn’t Microsoft’s fault though. The NSA would have severely punished or extorted Microsoft executives if they didn’t comply.
Why the fuck does America need a 4th branch of government? (The so-called Deep State i.e. NSA/CIA/FBI/DIA etc etc) Obviously not mentioned anywhere in the constitution.
Answer: Allen Dulles and his Masters (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Rockefeller).
Heckuva job Allen. Now the jews control this monster.
What do you think of this Puppy? Bill Gates and Epstein knew each other quite well….after Epstein was convicted of paedophiia.
What the hell was Gates talking to Epstein about???
Personally, I don’t think Gates would have slept with young girls. But I have no idea what he was doing with Epstein.
And the NYT (i.e jewish elite) publishing this piece linking Gates with Epstein is confusing. Clearly they want to attack Bill Gates, but why do it by linking with their Mossad asset??
I can’t make sense of this story quite frankly. If anything I feel more sympathetic to Gates because the jews are attacking him.
“The Times article included details about Mr. Gates’s interactions with Mr. Epstein that Ms. French Gates had not previously known, according to people familiar with the matter. Soon after its publication she began consulting with divorce lawyers and other advisers who would help the couple divide their assets, one of the people said. ”
So Bill Gates wife initiated divorce proceedings as soon as she found out Gates was talking to Epstein which means….she knew what Epstein was bringing to the table.
Jews are not attacking Gates. The NY Times just needs to appease the few real journalists it has by letting them occasionally report real news or else they’ll lose what credibility with the public they still have left.
Jesus Christ Puppy. Do I have to spell out everything for you?!
Its OBVIOUSLY a hit piece. Normally the NY times would just memory hole this type of information relating to their beloved Mossad agent. What the fuck is the NYT drawing attention to Epstein for? Why are they attacking Bill Gates? It doesn’t make any sense.
The ‘journalist’ process at the NYT was something like this:
Editor: “I need someone to write a hit piece on Bill Gates”.
Journo/Propogandist: “Yes sir. I’ll come up with something really damaging”.
Its not like the journalists were sitting around in the canteen and someone came up with the idea to attack Bill Gates via Epstein out of the blue.
No the conversation went like this.
Journalist: “I just got a WORLD EXCLUSIVE scoop. Melinda Gates is divorcing Bill because he’s good friends with Epstein. This is big. We got publish it above the fold”
Editor: “We’re not really focusing much on Epstein”
Journalist: “Excuse me? I GOT A BIG STORY AND I’D LIKE IT PUBLISHED ABOVE THE FOLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”
….
Later that night
Editor: “Fucken bitch wont back down”
Bibi: “Don’t worry, the more you fight it, the more suspicious she will be. This story will come and will it go. As long as no mention of Israel, the American people are too stupid to connect the dots, and even if the do, Trump and the evangelical Qtards and Alex Jones fans have our back 100%”
The rank and file propagandists don’t have the power to push their editors around like this if it doesn’t fit the narrative I’m afraid.
The idea that the NYT is worried about ratings is also laughable. NYT ran at a loss for 20 years before Carlos Slim bailed it out. They don’t care about ‘scoops’ and advertiser money.
Hypothetically Bibi or whoever the Mossad propaganda station chief is in New York would likely be severely reluctant to mention Epstein at all. They would never take a risk like that with the goyim and link him willingly with powerful people. It was supposed to be a secret until I led the battle in Cernovich’s comment section for him to re-investigate Epstein and from that point, the alt-media became interested in Epstein leading to Epstein’s eventual re-trial.
This story about Gates is bizarre. Maybe Gates did something the jews didn’t like that we don’t know about?
What good is the NY Times as a propagandizer if it doesn’t have a large smart audience that takes it seriously. That means they have to employ at least some real journalists and at least occasionally give in to their demands.
NY magazine bravely listed DOZENS of super powerful people with PROVEN Epstein links though this was back when they were independently owned:
https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/07/jeffrey-epstein-high-society-contacts.html
So your theory is that occasionally they have to do real journalism to keep up the charade its a ‘paper of record’? I’m not totally dismissive of that idea but you could do that in other ways.
Drawing attention to the number one Mossad asset/agent in New York is simply verboten unless you thought Bill Gates really needed to be be put down.
But we’ve reached a point where THOUSANDS of people are now DEMANDING the media cover the Epstein case. So rather than cover Epstein’s links to politicians (which raises serious questions about national sovereignty) why not throw the public a bone by sacrificing Gates who millions of angry Americans hate anyway because they think he created covid or the vaccine to genocide or sterilize the World or something Qtarded like that.
They’ve already sacrificed Epstein, Maxwell, Prince Andrew…there’s almost no big names left other than Gates before they’ll have to start discussing the really important people like potentially blackmailed world leaders or major funders or backers
And among those who are interested in this topic, the Mossad connection is not a secret, but somehow most Americans are just too stupid to care about that angle; they just want to see powerful pedos behind bars and don’t care who was blackmailing them or why.
per wills (author of Papal Sin and harsh critic of popes) the papacy is the sacrament of unity. and as the popes lost all temporal power their power in matters eternal grew.
this pope or that pope is silly…but the papacy, the empirate, is not.
so it was in the roman empire.
commodus, caligula, nero, augustulus … ridiculous! douchey!
the eternal city abides.
st. peter’s basillica is so named…
why?
because st peter’s bones are literally underneath it. FACT!
And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
Only a few weeks ago you said Bill Gates was an elite because he was really rich and super high IQ. Now you’ve finally realised he’s not in the tent. Good. We’re making progress.
The best strategy Mossad can do at this point with Epstein is to sit on anything got to do with Epstein, not to publish follow on pieces linking him with this or that celebrity.
I completely agree though that the NYT will NEVER EVER publish a piece linking him with a politician or a judge.
Only a few weeks ago you said Bill Gates was an elite because he was really rich and super high IQ. Now you’ve finally realised he’s not in the tent. Good. We’re making progress.
Nothing’s changed. We just define “elite” differently. It’s not a very useful word.
I completely agree though that the NYT will NEVER EVER publish a piece linking him with a politician or a judge.
If the story is big enough, they will in order to maintain their credibility:
They probably would BREAK such a story though.
I can’t read it, its behind a paywall. But in this case I bet the NYT ‘debunk’ any links between Epstein and Clinton and in fact say Clinton was just doing it for his charity or something of that ilk.
Install the uMatrix plugin. The text is on the page, scripts are just blocking you from scrolling through it. It’s barely a wall.
“According to The Daily Beast, Melinda was present for a meeting between her husband and Epstein at the latter’s Upper East Side mansion in September of that year, and afterwards told friends that “she was furious at the relationship between the two men”.
Melinda described “how uncomfortable she was in the company of the wealthy sex offender”, the site said, and “told friends she wanted nothing to do with him”. Sources close to the couple told the site that “Gates’ friendship with Epstein – who for years was accused of molesting scores of underage girls – still haunts Melinda”.
Speaking to CBS, she said she went to meet Epstein because she “wanted to see who this man was”, adding that she “regretted it from the second I stepped in the door”. She described Epstein as “abhorrent” and “evil personified”.
“I had nightmares about it afterwards. So, you know, my heart breaks for these young women, because that’s how I felt and here I’m an older woman. My god, I feel terrible for those young women. It was awful,” she said.”
What was Bill Gates doing talking to Epstein puppy?
In May 2021, The Daily Beast reported that Gates sought Epstein’s advice “on ending his marriage with Melinda after the Microsoft co-founder complained about her during a series of meetings at the money manager’s mansion”.
A person familiar with the meetings told the site that “going to Jeffrey’s was a respite from his marriage. It was a way of getting away from Melinda”. They added that Gates and Epstein “were very close”.
Epstein was probably the cool best friend Gates never had in high school, who introduces him to a life of sex, drugs and rock n’roll and tells him “you’re the richest man on Earth! Chicks dig that! What are you doing with that uptight puritanical parasitic bitch Melinda when you could be eating the best pussy on Earth”
For a socially awkward, sexually oppressed nerd who attended an all boy’s high school and then entered a male dominated nerdy autistic profession, someone like Epstein may have been a breath of fresh air.
I just hope he had the social IQ and morals to not get caught on tape sleeping with a minor, but then if social geniuses like Bill Clinton & Trump were perhaps targeted by Epstein, it’s hard to not think the worst.
“and then entered a male dominated nerdy autistic profession”
You just said above that programming is not an autistic profession. Make up your mind.
I agree programming has more autists than comparable career paths, but a lot of this may relate to its low barrier to entry. Anyone with skills gets hired, regardless of credentials and social graces.
If hedge funds were to hire anyone who could do the job, they too might see a huge rise in autists.
There are only so many super-rich people in the world. If super-rich people socialize with their own kind and go to events where other super-rich people are, they’re bound to meet each other at some point.
when you’re shorter than your father in america there’s something wrong with you.
bill gates isn’t just half an inch shorter than his father.
sad.
but it is a tribute to freedom and america that an autist like gates could get so rich. in the USSR he would’ve been publishing math papers no one read.
because it’s my family i assume it’s normal but upon reflection i think maybe it’s not.
i was between 2 and 3 inches taller than my dad and my brother and i are exactly the same height. exactly. but his penis is bigger. my mom claims.
but his penis is bigger. my mom claims.
That must have been an awkward dinner time discussion.
obviously she wouldn’t know if puberty had changed things.
but parents have to give dey keeeds a bath up to a certain age.
sad.
I don’t think Gates has autism. Hes a nerd and all nerds have social deficiencies e.g. me especially when I was young.
Lion of the Blog I believe wrote a good post about the differences between the two.
“what do you mean ‘luck’?” peepee axes in ebonics.
i mean if they took the SAT the next year they’d score really high but very unlikely they’d score perfect again.
whereas so many who missed only 4 questions might score perfect.
multiple choice means 20% correct by chance.
0.2^4 = 16 out of 10,000.
the gmat was still that way when i took it.
the gre general idk because it gave perfect scaled scores even if you’d missed some on the verbal…BUT it had THREE sections not just TWO…and on those a perfect score was required for a perfect score so to say afaiu.
interesting thing is…despite the “leeway” on the verbal section an 800 on the verbal was much rarer than on the other two sections. like less than 10% as common.
pill is right that the pope has no power…is a ridiculous person…
sort of…
but explaining “…sort of…” would require more liver damage.
i will explain later.
The papacy or ‘the roman empire’ as you call it basically ended when the Spanish Armada failed.
protestants and muslims are faking it.
so are buddhists and most hindus.
sad.
100% of the sincerely religious pipo are roman catholics, eastern orthodox, or vedantists.
and, contra lebensunwertes leben like that guy sam harris…
to be sincerely religious REQUIRES a high IQ.
everyone else is faking it.
not faking it REQUIRES a high IQ.
you stabbed salmon rushdie.
or you ride in rolls royces.
osho worshipped satan. FACT!
Think of all the stories the NYT/WAPO/CNN bury to get the compliance of elites/politicians. If their propagandists dig up something or get tipped off about say, Joe Biden the NYT/Mossad basically call up Biden and say “we will publish this story and it will look really bad but we won’t do it if you help us”.
Thats why the media isn’t a normal “business”. Libertarian autist retards don’t get that. The power of the media is mentioned extensively in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion for a reason. It should be completely regulated and maybe in some cases, nationalised. Fuck “free” speech.
but regulated by whom?
by you?
OR…
by pipo who wanna destroy you?
IDIOT!
the human predicament is…no angels from heaven or outer space.
this is what’s so absurd about the trump hitler comparison…americans would never put up with totalitarianism.
“regulated by whom?”
Nationalised media exists extensively throughout Europe. Its not great but it isn’t a fucking extortion operation like it is in America or Britain. Murdoch just needs to snap his fingers and all politicians fall to his knees and hes just the gentile example.
Be interesting to analyse why Pat Buchanan never broke through to the republican voters but Trump did even though they have the exact same policies.
Poor Pat/John the Baptist
According to the New Testament, John anticipated a messianic figure greater than himself,[28] and the Gospels portray John as the precursor or forerunner of Jesus.[29] Jesus himself identifies John as “Elijah who is to come”,[30] which is a direct reference to the Book of Malachi (Malachi 4:5),[31] that has been confirmed by the angel who announced John’s birth to his father, Zechariah.[32] According to the Gospel of Luke, John and Jesus were relatives.
he did break through. he won the NH primary. but he was running against an incumbent president bush 41.
leave american history to americans.
PLUS buchanan is thought to be an antisemite by a much larger fraction of jews than trump is. dershowitz for example labels him as such but doesn’t so label trump.
If Dershowitz opposes Buchanan that explains why Buchanan wasn’t allowed break through than GHW Bush being a great candidate dumbass.
Trump had one huge advantage that Buchanan lacked: social media
Yeah good point actually. Trump could bypass jewish media. But more generally if Dershowitz (who openly works for Mossad) says youre an anti-semite that means no donors, no media coverage, nobody will work for your campaign and the deep state will try to blackmail you.
Right, and Dershowitz probably considers Trump a philosemite which doubles his advantage.
other than what buchanan has ever said this is explained by his romanism.
anti-catholic is still a totally acceptable prejudice in america.
btw, it should be acceptable…but so should a lot of other prejudices which aren’t.
and these should be acceptable NOT because they are true. but tbecause if someone is a roman it’s NOT like someone who has green eyes or whatever. it’s an ideology…with political implications.
and yes the kennedys are way more catholic than biden.
You seem obsessed with catholics and the catholic church.You probably know catholic church doctrine better than 90% of priests. Why would you waste time reading that stuff?? Even more bizarre than Puppy’s obsession with Oprah quite frankly.
of course in the old days the roman church would’ve burnt salman alive. way worse than stabbing. satanic. what a retarded religion.
but islam has had no reformation. the equivalent of protestantism within islam is quranism which is a death sentence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quranism
all islam has to do to is stop the death sentence for apostates.
AND is this even quranic? did the quran really say, “convert. but if you go back on it we’ll kill you”?
all that burning at the stake crap was so UN-scriptural it makes me wanna throw up.
rabbinic judaism and christianity developed at the same time. neither is a continuation of ancient judaism. both are innovations. the upper class jews in the first century were sadducees.
and the proposition “karaism is to rabbinic judaism as protestantism is to orthodoxy” is false.
the roman church talks about “tradition” but in all of its controversial (protestant ridiculed) dogmas it’s MORE scriptural than protestants.
talmudry and jesuitry aren’t the same.
NAME ONE WAY IN WHICH TRUMP IS NOT SUPERIOR TO YOU PEEPEE!
ONE!
ONE!
ONE!
IQ
But hes definitely more intelligent than you Puppy.
^autism^
Exactly its because you have autism and he doesn’t. Correct answer for once.
LOL! even if I did, my g would overpower his social IQ. I’d get right in his face & say “you’re the dumbest man to ever occupy the white house and everybody knows it”
The crowd goes wild!
I would pay a lot of money to watch you debate trump.
I’d wait for him to brag about his degree from Wharton and then simply say “What’s 17 times 6?”
Wait, you’re not also better looking? It’s not hard to be better looking than Trump.
He said name ONE thing.
I dont understand Melo. If trump is a russian spy because he thinks the Iraq war is a bad idea does that mean all leftists (including presumably you) are also russian spies? Basically anyone that opposes Israel’s lebensraum wars are russian spies?
peepee really hates andre the giant.
sad.
doesn’t ax it.
I am a leftist too by the way Melo. Probably more of a real leftist than you actually. Calling yourself ‘woke’ was super embarrassing.
WOW! SAD!
melo personality vs pill personality.
if you’re not a christian socialist or islamic socialist or whatever then you’re not a socialist. you’re a satanist with a retarded theory of economics.
FACT!
sadly i have to explain to people with IQs much lower than trump’s that one may be an atheist and a christian socialist at the same time.
Have I damaged your perception of Bill Gates Puppy? I get that you don’t think Bill Gates boosting Africa’s fertility levels is a bad thing (probably the opposite, you believe African babies are a really good thing for humanity) but this Epstein stuff and then criticizing him from the left as a terrible boss, husband and citizen must have changed your opinion.
Gates has no relevance to Middle East policy so his relationship to Epstein is irrelevant
Ok so the Mossad/CIA line is Trump is a russian spy who is working with the Kremlin to destablise America by closing the american border to latin americans and muslims, stopping the Israeli lebensraum wars and ripping up trade agreements that aren’t to the benefit of America.
….if Trump openly said he was a Russian spy on tv and sang the Russian national anthem but kept all those policies, if I was American I would still vote for him over any other Republican candidate.
This investigation into Trump’s record keeping is another flagrant political purge. The jews have lost patience. They couldn’t stop Trump using the media and the donors so now its time for the Deep State again. They failed with Mueller so I guess this record keeping stuff will fail too because its even dumber sounding and even more obvious that its a hatchet job.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Clapper
I bet this guy was taking calls directly from Rubin and the Council of Foreign Relations. Obama was his ‘nominal’ boss. Obama might never have even met him while he was president lol.
So you think Obama was just a puppet? Some people think he’s (or Valarie Jarret or Susanne Rice) Biden’s puppet master.
I liked the Obama Administrations policies and thought Obama was a good president and there are some areas where he challenged jewish power like the Iran Deal (although the Council of Foreign Relations officially endorsed the Iran Deal) but yeah, he would have little to no power over Clappers work. Clapper is a hardcore deep state guy. He’s accountable to Obama’s bosses onl.
Grim sadism is an aspergers trait
was that a joke? peepee is so tarded sometimes i can’t tell.
soros stopped managing his own money when he gave the rei(g)ns to druckenmiller.
he did not give away 32b then but over time.
how much would soros and gates be worth today if they’d given away no money?
soros $40b at least.
gates?
Since its establishment in 1993, OSF has reported expenditures in excess of $16 billion mostly in grants towards NGOs, aligned with the organisation’s mission…Endowment $19,590,570,302[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Society_Foundations
btw, soros is no fan of israel…or so the germans would have us believe.
how much would soros and gates be worth today if they’d given away no money?
soros $40b at least.
I’d say your estimate is on the high side, but either way, nowhere near as rich as Gates who’d be worth at least $183 billion had he not given to charity.
Puppy do you even know the conceptual difference between cash and having your net worth tied up in stock? If Gates liquidates, hes not worth anything close to $180b.
Where have all the black IQ SAT pages gone? Why delete them?
Puppy loves the blacks.
What is the connection between things if symbols are just representations and not concrete determinants of reality? How can the same thing be evoked many times over with the same outcomes if there is no objectivity to it?
Something ive pondered over for a long time!