
As discussed here many times, some psychologists speculate that autism is extreme male brain and that schizophrenia is extreme female brain. If this theory is correct, we’d expect the least autistic, and thus most socially intelligent men to be in touch with their feminine side, and it’s hard to think of a more socially intelligent man than Bill Clinton.
Although Clinton was arguably the smartest President of the 20th century, he is unarguably the most socially gifted President of any century. I remember seeing him on Donahue around age ten and predicting he’d be the next President because I had never before seen a talk show host as brilliant as Donahue be so dominated by their own guest. Donahue was blown off the stage and relegated to the back of the studio while Bill took over the show fielding questions from the studio audience.
It may be hard for young readers to relate to this because the Bill we see today is a shadow of his former self. Cognitive decline seems to be more acute in those from lower class backgrounds like Clinton
But in the late 1990s Chris Mathews and other pundits would gush every night about how Bill Clinton was the greatest political genius anyone had ever seen.
But one night Mathews said something especially interesting. Unlike most men, Clinton had no male heroes. He didn’t look up to war heroes and other great men of history like other Presidents did. It seemed Bill’s only heroes were women (something I can relate to). Hillary in particular who he would constantly praise for her incredible intelligence even though his own IQ was arguably much higher.
The reason Bill identifies so much with women is also the reason he’s so politically gifted: extreme female brain. The opposite of autism. Indeed so female is Clinton’s brain that when he ended his Presidency, he was in talks with major networks about hosting his own afternoon lady’s talk show, though talks broke down when the free market failed to offer him Oprah money. The New York Times wrote:
There is a delicious symmetry in Clinton’s exploring the idea of a daytime syndicated talk show: the man who brought Oprah-style psychobabble and misty confessions to politics taking the next step and actually transmogrifying into Oprah.
Being the opposite of autistic also made Clinton a big hit with the ladies, despite his mediocre looks. He had game and could charm any woman into the bedroom.
Although many men with extreme female brains are either too schizophrenic to get women, or become gay and thus don’t want them, there were probably many like Clinton who were just feminine enough to have brilliant social skills and intuition, which historically allowed them to breed prolifically. This explains why gays have not self-selected themselves out of the gene pool, despite not reproducing. They are a spandrel for the socially brilliant lady’s men like Bill Clinton.
Here’s a subject that’s bound to start arguments: You go to Moe’s Burritos or Subway or whatever kinda semi-restaurant in your area where you place an order and then the workers make it for you from a line of ingredients. You sit down and eat your order. When you’re done, should you leave the serving tray on the table? I was told that you’re supposed to leave the tray and trash on the table because if you pick up the tray and throw the trash away, you could be putting someone out of a job. Many others were taught the same. Other people think this makes you trash.
This is a super bizarre comment.
The trolley problem except the trolley is a shopping cart, you’re in the control of it, returning it means someone is out of a job, but in not doing so you’ll be hated by society for eternity because you’ve inconvenienced someone else.
The answer is to refuse to return any borrowed items or personally deal with any trash until the institution of public service maids is established. It’s for the economy… you wouldn’t understand.
Biscuit you fucking imbecile autist no one cares for your insight or lack thereof on this website. go contact an autist help group or something and find real help where people can help you learn to support yourself without a caretakers intervention.
i sincerely mean this cant stand a fuckface like you insulting me when he cant change his diapers all by himself either. retard.
The only other commenter who both saw the absurdity of leaving behind garbage for the sake of creating busywork for others and made a joke about it, albeit not at the time of commenting, was Bruno. If the sentence is too long then I’ll reword it for you: my insight isn’t unique. I guess either my playing along with the absurdity wasn’t obvious, or that you just weren’t able to see the joke. Judging by how your insults are directed at me being lazy, you probably didn’t see the joke. I don’t have any advice to give you other than to learn to at least pretend to have some humility. If excessive self-worth is all that’s keeping you going then ignore my advice.
I thought it was a good comment.
… Yikes who told you that bullshit? I agree with Philo for once – very bizarre comment. Putting your tray by the garbage can is nothing like, say, going to the grocery store and using the self-scan which literally takes people’s jobs.
“Yikes who told you that bullshit?”
My mom
What terrible information to give.
Advice given by women is almost uniformly worthless.
“Putting your tray by the garbage can is nothing like, say, going to the grocery store and using the self-scan which literally takes people’s jobs.”
What in the world is the difference besides a matter of degree? (which is important but still…)
I didn’t find this comment bizarre at all, this blog is full of Mugabe and Philosopher’s off-topic comments that don’t usually make sense unless you know their personality and read 6 other blogs.
I have said that some times when I went there with my nephews when they were 5/10 yo to justify my laziness (and not wanting to help them do that). But it was more of a joke based on a pseudo economic argument.
If it were true, you would throw your garbage on the streets to give property employees more work and basically trash all businesses, where there is a cleaning team, from swimming pools to theaters.
When I was at school, I would have voted the death penalty, if asked for a judgment, for pupils who put chewing gum under the tables btw.
It’s really ment to be a self-indulging joke …
can i play some of your characters peepee?
What’s the argument that there are two KINDS of brains – male and female? Brains are just brains – they are not sexed. Nevermind that it assumes physicalism.
male and female are just 2 ends of a spectrum
What do you mean by kinds? Kinds implies discrete categories, when it could just be a spectrum of male to female.
What makes a brain male or female? I want to know what justifies the claim that brains could be sexed. So when does a feature of a brain count as “typical of males” and how many of these features are needed for a brain to be a “male brain”? Vice versa for “female brains.”
Quite obviously the implication I’m drawing is that sex and gender are properties of humans, not their brains. Kind of like a mereological fallacy.
RR,
Male brains are said to have more front to back connections while female brains are said to have side to side and top to bottom (my theory)connections. And male=more white than gray matter and female=more gray than white matter. Of course some brains or males can also be female like and vice versa.
RR, I’m not sure what you’re driving at here.
I don’t know whether there are any essential/fundamental structural differences between the brains of men and the brains of women, but the averages differ substantially in size and distribution of mass. Male/female differences in performance on a wide array of cognitive tasks are marked and have been established for decades.
How can someone be a ‘race realist’ but a sex (gender is a dirty word) denialist?
Hes not a race realist either by the way. He denies any difference between the races. I have no idea why I called his blog that.
He used to be a huge HBDer, and frankly a huge racist, before he had his road to Damascus moment. Many social justice warriors are so lacking in social IQ they think he’s faking his current position and is still a closet racist.
I skimmed his blog after reading that he used to be racist. Nothing there struck me as being virulently racist, but virulent racism – to me – is the Klan or Romper Stomper.
Perhaps I too shall hear the voice of Yakub. “Ay yo, why you persecute me?”
I would say this is pretty racist. (From September, 2016.)
“So to wrap this all up, the stereotype (which is based on truth) that black women are loud and willing to fight at the drop of a hat is true. High levels of testosterone in black women explain how black men have higher levels than whites (because they are exposed to it invitro).”
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/09/06/black-women-and-testosterone/
Then see this from a year later.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2017/10/06/no-black-women-do-not-have-higher-testosterone-than-white-women-and-more-on-hereditarian-claims-on-racial-testosterone-differences/
See here for definitions of racism.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2020/08/02/racism-stress-and-physiology/
I already stated the implication of what I’m arguing – sex/gender are properties of humans, not any of their organs. To believe they are is to be guilty of the mereological fallacy (Bennet and Hacker, 2002; Kitchen, 2017).
In regard to “differences in performance [between men and women] on a wide array of cognitive tasks”, Terman (arbitrarily) decided that the sexes should be equal in “IQ” and so he constructed his test for that result. Since newer tests are “validated” by their relationship with older tests, I don’t need to state the implication of that – it’s clear as day.
Furthermore, for the SAT as Kidder and Rosner (2002) argue, there is unintentional bias in the SAT that widens score gaps between blacks and whites due to how questions are selected.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2019/11/15/the-history-and-construction-of-iq-tests/
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2020/04/22/race-gender-and-the-sat/
I am a race realist – in that I believe that races are biologically real.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2018/02/18/minimalist-races-exist-and-are-biologically-real/
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2018/06/09/blumenbachian-partitions-and-mimimalist-races/
But I don’t believe what I call “psychological hereditarianism”, which I define as the ideology that differences between groups are due to genetic differences. Although these claims fail since reductionism of all kinds fail, especially reducing mind to genes and brains.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2020/08/16/conceptual-arguments-against-heredetarianism/
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2021/08/10/reductionism-natural-selection-and-hereditarianism/
Lastly, I described how and why I changed my views in the spring of 2017 here – Steven Heine’s DNA is not Destiny and Ken Richardson’s Genes, Brains and Human Potential changed my views. From there, I discovered more DST thinkers like Oyama, Moore, Jablonka and Lamb, and that solidified my view changes. Then I got into philosophy of mind and mind-brain substance dualism and this led me to believe that human psychology can’t be reduced to brain states/neurology and that human action is irreducible, along with the human mind. I do believe that the views I argue on philosophy of mind are lethal for hereditarianism, and I have not found anyone using arguments for substance dualism to attack hereditarianism.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2019/08/24/why-did-i-change-my-views/
“I already stated the implication of what I’m arguing – sex/gender are properties of humans, not any of their organs. To believe they are is to be guilty of the mereological fallacy (Bennet and Hacker, 2002; Kitchen, 2017).”
We seem to be in agreement that there’s no essential difference between the brains of men and the brains of women. Do you deny that men (1) have larger brains than women (on average) and that (2) the distribution of mass is different (on average)?
“In regard to “differences in performance [between men and women] on a wide array of cognitive tasks”, Terman (arbitrarily) decided that the sexes should be equal in “IQ” and so he constructed his test for that result. Since newer tests are “validated” by their relationship with older tests, I don’t need to state the implication of that – it’s clear as day.”
I think that we’re also in agreement that I.Q. is a deeply flawed measure of intelligence, although for different reasons. Terman’s belief that the sexes should be equal (or nearly so) in ‘intelligence’ was worse than arbitrary, it was contradicted by common sense and history. The 2 pt delta grossly understates the manifest difference between male and female intelligence.
If schiz was extreme female brain then why are the most schiz race – blacks – the most masculine? Have you ever met an autistic person puppy? Masculine is the last word I would use.
Blacks are physically and emotionally masculine but they’re cognitively feminine. Verbal IQ > spatial IQ. They’re also feminine in that they care about fashion more than whites do. Autistics are masculine in their interests: objects, science, computers, math, systems. One reason why autistics may not seem masculine is they’re so lacking in social IQ they haven’t even learned basic gender roles or they may know but simply not care.
I completely agree
pattern recognition and application are very important. but so are awareness and processing ability.
i should probably refrain from talking about myself here because many have a crabs-in-a-bucket mentality especially users like Pill who just want to destroy peoples self-esteem.
I am so autistic I have even systematized my subjective ‘spiritual’ (for the lack of a better word) views and my verbal-non verbal gap is so great that I can’t express them lol.
I don’t understand the, “Blacks are hypermasculine” meme.
Sub-Saharan blacks have been consistently enslaved and degraded throughout the entire recorded history of civilization. They’ve never established an empire worthy of the name. American blacks are not taller or stronger than American whites.
AIDS is rampant among black women in America (relative to other groups of women) because so many black men are practicing sodomites. Really ‘masculine’ behavior.
Blacks have way more testosterone than other men of other races if given the same nutrition. They never conquered other races because quite frankly, they were too dumb to develop the weapons or logistics needed.
Look at Serena Williams, she had bigger muscles than her white husband! Black women have more testosterone than most asian men.
and whites are masculine how? most whites are in exactly the same boat as the Asians….PUSSIES!
the white man can boast that he will let Pelosi safely land in Taiwan sometime this year because well the Chinese are (you guessed it) PUSSIES!
Whites are medium level testosterone. Certainly more than your fellow Pakistanis.
“and whites are masculine how?”
Conquered the globe. Any more questions?
Nah Pakistanis are ubermensch. and conquering the globe a few centuries ago does not prove that white men today have sufficient testosterone at all.
i thought you were logistic person Neandercel come up with something good next time 🙂
“Nah Pakistanis are ubermensch”
Nah bro, I agree. I love South Asians.
“His shtick (or is it “schtick?”) is eloquent craziness or meaninglessness. Are you responsible for it? haha”
Oops I meant to reply to this but accidentally posted it because some websites Ctrl enter makes goes to the next line and some post the message.
Anyway, I’ve never read anything of Chris’s that didn’t make sense. It was either incomprehensible (because most people don’t understand someone with 200 IQ working at their most abstract) or it made perfect sense and was stated with the accuracy of someone clearly very intelligent.
And Trump has a higher social IQ than even Clinton. But yeah, Clinton is also a genius in terms of social IQ.
Trump might fit the theory in that he wears bronzer, is very concerned about his hair, worships Oprah, gets in catfights with famous women, total narcissist. All very female traits.
LOL he doesn’t worship Oprah. Where is the evidence for that porky??
There’s so much evidence:
The video with Larry King is more proof that Trump doesn’t really talk like a 14 year old except when hes being a politician.
He was also decades younger then. By the time you’re close to 80, your brain is essentially mush. Whenever I’m listing to an interview and the guest is old, I stop listening because I know it’s going to be painful to listen to. Trump’s IQ has probably not dropped because IQ is based on percentile within age, and if the average old man has dropped to 11-year-old speaking level, he can stay in the 90+ percentile despite dropping to 14-year-old.
But I do agree he dumbs it down a bit in part because simple repetitive talking points are persuasive.
Chris Langan is 70 and still seems coherent in his interviews, although not as verbally fluent as the ones he did in his forties. I guess being that smart gives you more of a ‘buffer’ to absorb losses in brain quality.
Well Chris has 2 buffers. High IQ and big brain which may add cognitive reserve independently of IQ
Soros is 90 and he’s still an above-average speaker. Chomsky too.
How do you know how big his brain is?
Because I’m the creative genius behind his whole shtick. Over 20 years ago when I first discovered the internet I was talking about head size on a message board & Chris mentioned helmets never fit because his head is 25.5″. I did the math and said “don’t you understand? Your HC is just as freakishly high as your Mega score. This shows your freakishly high Mega score has a physiological basis”
Next thing I knew he was quoted by Esquire and other sources talking about how many SDs his HC is:
I don’t see how you can successfully draw the inference that (1) high HC means high brain size; (2) that high Mega score and high HC therefore justifies the claim that the “score has a physiological basis.”
HC & cranial capacity are closely linked:
https://pumpkinperson.com/2020/02/29/the-non-linear-relationship-between-head-circumference-cranial-capacity/
I can’t prove his huge brain large caused his huge Mega score, but it’s an interesting coincidence.
“Because I’m the creative genius behind his whole shtick”
His shtick (or is it “schtick?”) is eloquent craziness or meaninglessness. Are you responsible for it? haha
“langan” doesn’t sound like a chinapeople name. sad.
the average grip strength of an icelandic woman is greater than that of a south asian man.
I think it’s a safe bet that his huge skull -> his huge brain -> his high Mega score. What I’m skeptical of is PP’s apparent implication that Chris only noticed that chain of inferences after PP pointed it out to him.
A huge skull CAUSES a huge brain??? I’m sure he had some vague notion that his big head was related to his IQ, but I doubt he knew his cranium was anywhere near as rare as his Mega score until I told him.
A huge skull doesn’t cause a huge brain. The huge barrel on a tank gun doesn’t cause the ammunition in it to be huge. When you see a tank gun, do you assume that it’s being loaded with 9-millimeter rounds?
Langan is smart as shit. He knew his cranium was massive long before you could have told him, as he mentioned in an interview that he couldn’t be fitted for a graduation cap, presumably in high school since he never graduated college. That would have been circa 1970 since Langan was born in 1952, before you were alive. I don’t see how he couldn’t have made that connection. Failing to do so would imply unobservance to a degree incompatible with his intelligence.
He knew his cranium was massive but he didn’t know it was FREAKISHLY millions to one massive, he didn’t know its Z score nor did he know its Z score matched his Mega Z score & what a colossal coincidence it was that 2 such freakishly high Z scores matched. That was all my doing & in a just World, I’d get the Nobel prize.
Huh; I’m surprised he never thought to look that information up. With 23/24 on the verbal section of the Mega Test, he was clearly efficient at using reference aids even in the pre-Internet era, unless he knew all the required information offhand, which I think is unlikely even for him
Did you think to look up your head size before you found my blog?
I think so, but I don’t recall for sure. When did I start commenting on your blog? If I knew that, then I could look for records that show I researched the rarity of my head size before then.
I think so,
I don’t. Unless you heard about it from Chris L which is just hearing about if from me second hand.
yeah. that albanian’s comments remind me…
at least today…all continental nationalities seem weird…
except…
the italians.
frenchpipo, germanpipo, dutchpipo, vikingpipo…
fucking WEIRD!
but then actual “spanish americans” just pass as white american.
carlos estevez, jerry garcia, ken hernandez, nick fuentes, ted cruz, jose capablanca…
just wypipo.
“His shtick (or is it “schtick?”) is eloquent craziness or meaninglessness. Are you responsible for it? haha”
In French « big head » means «intelligent ». Once, after my first year of primary (6yo), teacher said to my parents that as I had such a big head and was so good at math, I could do any study and get any job I wanted do. I remember asking myself if she was joking or if she believed there was something true in the metaphore. I thought that some of our most illustrious French people in the history books seemed to have a tiny head and that probably whales had an enormous head. I never thought about it afterwards.
It’s still remarkable because as I don’t have episodic memory, I probably have for the period 5 yo to 2 or 3 years ago, les than 2 or 3 « memory » (meaning knowledge about my own experience in the first person but without mind traveling). So this moment must have been a very important one even if there was no follow up in my mind.
So I gladly give you credit in my case for this idea.
I mean 2 or 3 memories per year.
“With 23/24 on the verbal section of the Mega Test, he was clearly efficient at using reference aids…”
Interesting aside: if you were to ask Chris, he’d likely tell you that his performance was even better than you’ve indicated, saying something to the effect that he’d scored 23/23 on the verbal, which, together with his 24/24 on the numerical/spatial section, amounted to a perfect score. He (and others) felt that item 20 was flawed.
Your social IQ on the other hand is in the extreme retardation level with Anime and Ganzir.
LOL! II will email you your social judgement results this weekend so you can see how disabled you really are.
I’m a bit of an anomaly because I have some autistic traits (obsessed with numbers and brain size) but also have female traits (interested in Oprah, and politics) and unlike autistics, I engaged in an enormous amount of pretend play as a child (made up elaborate soap operas with my star wars figures, wrote horror stories etc). I think it’s possible that some people are on both the autistic and schiz spectrum even if these are opposites. Fat and muscle are opposites and it’s possible to be both.
Fat and muscles are not a spectrum, since they don’t exist in the same space. Or maybe this autistic-male/schizo-female theory is bad.
opposites in that one is soft and feminine and the other is hard and masculine.
Politics, female?
bad example
>Fat and muscles are not a spectrum
Could be the variation of the fat/muscle ratio within weight. Someone who’s underweight can’t possibly be both muscular and fat, but someone overweight could be both. Just by the nature of being overweight as long as it is a ratio there’ll be plenty of both relative to someone of average weight. Ignore bones and comically small amounts of either muscle or fat.
PP, I would like to suggest that electoral politics (stage politics) is feminine, and that geopolitics/covert politics is masculine. This accounts for the repulsive softness and hysterical traits of the majority of politicians in the developed world (including allegedly ‘masculine’ figures like Trump).
Pill, plz estimate my social IQ. UwU
Please don’t pick on Anjmekitty
Oh please peeps, you expect us to believe…you at 10 could understand all that and predict who the next president would be?
Yes, and I even bragged about it to my family at which point they’d yell back that I had a fifty-fifty chance and tell me to stop embarrassing myself. LOL
Well heres an interesting anecdote about my judgement. When me and my friend watched Trumps first rally together he immediately said he would become president because he could see his charisma. I agreed Trump had many special qualities but I actually thought Hilary would win because I took into account that the establishment would rig it against an outsider like Trump.
The reality is I was wrong but only because Trumps social IQ is so unworldly he was able to survive a full court press from the mass media and the authorities (remember the russia russia nonsense?).
Thats an example of how someone who knows a lot about politics can be wrong compared to a layman despite having better judgement.
Clinton may be a quasi autogynephiliac. It would explain why he would like ugly PAula Jones, Monica Lewinsky and Hillary Clinton,
Then it would be a case of masculine, agressive and narcissistic man who like the idea of himself like a woman. In Clinton case, like a woman liking a similar lesbian ….
Bruno, I wanted to ask you this. For a long time, I thought you were the high IQ Bruno of Quora. But you are much younger than he looks and afaik you have not lived in Brazil. Are you a different Bruno?
I have answered around 30 questions on Quora during 2 or 3 weeks a long time ago but I haven’t any “profile” there .
So you are effectively probably referring to someone else. It happens even here, or in LionofBLog, that some people posts with the same name, wich is the problem of using such a common name or alias. So despite the profile not being the same, I guess some Bruno answers may be mine (except if you check the profile every time)
No, whenever someone gives an answer on Quora, their full name and picture (if they have one) are displayed.
Lol so many things didn’t make sense yet I kept on thinking you two are the same person.
This is him: https://www.quora.com/Is-Jordan-Peterson-as-smart-as-people-say-he-is/answer/Bruno-Campello-de-Souza
🙂
I didn’t know this guy. He is very « verbal » and his English is far better than mine. He likes to be very careful with the wording of his answers as if it were a part of his job.
I like he tried to answer Taleb here :
View at Medium.com
The problem with his « answer » is that it doesn’t add value to the Sailer, Thompson etc answers.
To answer Taleb, one should probably use the same formalism and same style as Taleb.
Nobody has done it yet. Maybe because it’s not worth the pain. Probably also because so few psychologists have the math training to do that. Maybe another cognitive science specialist or a physics scientist, an economist or applied math guy interested in psychology could do the job one day …. I would agree to read it (even a draft)
I’m glad you found him interesting.
You and Ganzir should compete for the most bizarre comments possible. This is such a bad and strange judgement. Terrible.
Like most ladies men, Clinton has probably slept with hundreds of average looking women simply because he can. You don’t understand sexual relations at all.
I like this 🙂
Its true that women don’t really like math and objects and science. But the most masculine men don’t like that stuff either puppy. Perhaps its better to just drop the male-female brain theory. Theres not much evidence for it. Its just a supposition from Simon Baron Cohen.
Jensen claimed that testosterone has a curvilinear relationship with spatial ability which might explain why women and muscular men suck at spatial tasks while nerdy guys excel, but I’m sure RR would dispute that.
Lion claims puberty stunts the math brain and since males hit puberty late, they’re better at math than girls by high school.
Macho guys, like women, tend to hit puberty early and tend to suck at math.
And then nerdy guys like Bill Gates hit puberty late and are math geniuses.
The above picture is funny. It’s like Bill is looking up at the camera man & saying “your IQ is not high enough to be in this room”
Yeah there might be some sort of relationship with testosterone. Personally I have observed nerds and autists tend to have lower testosterone than average. I wouldn’t call a mathematician like Terry Tao masculine, but most math professors are men so something is going on with testosterone thats not fully understood.
I mean honestly, most black women have more testosterone than most white and asian nerds.
I figure my width, skull size, and relatively poor spatial ability mean I got doped with excessive testosterone in utero. I don’t display the apocryphal trait of high ring finger : index finger ratio, though.
“Personally I have observed nerds and autists tend to have lower testosterone than average”
One probably has to distinguish between high T in utero and during/after puberty, which perhaps doesn’t have a strong relationship within sex. Someone with high T in utero and low T during/after puberty may retain a lot of boyishness, including curiosity which is good for science.
“I figure my width, skull size, and relatively poor spatial ability mean I got doped with excessive testosterone in utero.
Aren’t those traits more determined during puberty?
“Aren’t those traits more determined during puberty?”
I don’t know
“The Philosophersaid:July 30, 2022 at 10:57 pm
99% of 12 year olds that love statistics are on the autism spectrum. Thats all Im going to say further on this.”
You admitted in this message that you are autistic according to your own criterion. You have written that you had an interest in national GDP(gross domestic product) statistics at the age of 12 on this blog.
this comment itself required quite a bit of autism to conjure up did it not.
My primary school teachers said that I am autistic. I went to a psychologist at the age of 7 to determine if I am autistic. She concluded that I am not autistic.
[redacted by pp, 2022-07-29]
https://www.glamour.com/story/serena-williams-and-her-daughter-shared-the-most-precious-moment-at-the-us-open
Serena has more muscles than her husband LOL.
I have a schiz brain obviously and find doing math and science quite boring. My career counsellor in school recommended becoming an engineer when I actually wanted to be a psychologist or therapist of some sort. I basically never bothered to do my math homework in school. I have much more interest in celeb gossip than hard science. So yeah I have a female brain. But I doubt puppy or Terry Tao is anywhere near as masculine as me even with the so called female brain.
What pill doesn’t understand is that my IQ 135 which means I’m essentially smarter than you at EVERYTHING. math, psychology, music, art; you name it.
I’m a one in 100 level intellect. Next time you’re on the street, count everyone who passes you by with the knowledge that the count must get to 100 before you’ve likely seen anyone as smart as me and this assuming you get out of your slum where the odds of my IQ are much smaller.
I’m a one in 100 level intellect. Next time you’re on the street, count everyone who passes you by with the knowledge that the count must get to 100 before you’ve likely seen anyone as smart as me
Wrong! The count only needs to go to 69 (Nice).
1 – (1 – 0.01)^69 ~= 0.5
Technically you’re right but we have to dumb things down for Pill. 🙂
Do you have any corroborating evidence for the philosopher’s intelligence being below 135(SD 15). It is believable because the vast majority of his posts are either trivial or completely retarded. However he is unique among the blogs regular commentariat for not divulging any of his official or experimental intelligence test scores. Illuminaticat has said that his IQ is 140, and Mugabe said that he was “easily above 140” during an altercation with the achondroplasic sasquatch Dealwithit. Of course, both of these claims are nonsensical. Do you know any of his actual test scores? You have said that you know he has taken some tests on the blog.
I remember all the conjecture on the philosophers IQ. Illuminaticat’s 140 estimate is old. In a more recent 2022 post he has implied that the philosopher is in the 125-140 range. I think that is correct. Pumpkin person has said that his full scale IQ is 125 with a huge discrepancy between his verbal and performance IQ. Jimmy said that he would be above 135 with supplements. Ganzir said that he is one standard deviation below Ganzir id est 135. I want to see Brunos estimate of the philosopher’s IQ.
There are many estimates yet the philosopher is determined to hide his intelligence test scores.
“Ganzir said that he is one standard deviation below Ganzir id est 135.”
Being a standard deviation below myself would be remarkable
Being high only in math, or high only in verbal, will result in a mind insufficiently general for brilliance. Analogous to how neither a train nor a car can replace an all-terrain vehicle.
“Pumpkin person has said that his full scale IQ is 125 with a huge discrepancy between his verbal and performance IQ.”
I guessed PP’s I.Q. was in the high 130s from reading his blog. I e-mailed him with this estimate and he confirmed that I was right to within, like, a point, if I recall. I like to think my sense for estimating people’s I.Q.’s has been honed to laser precision. It’s done unconsciously, in any case, as opposed to being a teachable method.
Pumpkin person has said that his full scale IQ is 125 with a huge discrepancy between his verbal and performance IQ.
No, it’s my verbal that I said was around 120, not my full-scale
No.
You wrote that about the philosopher in 2017. You didnt comprehend what I had written. It can be inferred from the context that all the numbers in that post pertain to the philosophers IQ. You wrote the same 125 full scale huge verbal performance discrepancy for gondwanaman and afrosapiens.
The his pronoun in that sentence refers to the philosopher’s IQ not yours.
Thanks for clarifying. I re-read the sentence in context and see your point.
“No, it’s my verbal that I said was around 120, not my full-scale”
The semantic content of your writing reflects a VIQ higher than 120, according to my intuitive estimate, but I also think your writing style tends to be relatively unpolished. The only way I think your verbal IQ is as low as 120 if it was on a PURELY verbal test, not a more g-loaded test which just happens to contain verbal content, e.g., Arithmetic.
I’ve never stated my IQ because its obvious to people without autism. For example, this ?~} commenter has severe autism and thats obvious to me, but he won’t be able to tell my IQ because that part of his brain never developed.
Let me be clear – you aren’t smarter than me puppy even by conventional IQ scores. Thats all I will say about my IQ. So I don’t know where you got that 120 IQ estimate from. When you include social intelligence and creativity, I’m considered by most people to present comparatively to you as an adult whereas Ganzir and ?~} would likely present as imbeciles or children to most people, even if they know how to do math.
The best analysis of my abilities is Marshas comments, not because she has the highest IQ, but because she doesn’t have autism.
When you include social intelligence and creativity, I’m considered by most people to present comparatively to you as an adult whereas Ganzir and ?~} would likely present as imbeciles or children to most people, even if they know how to do math.
I think any IQ would look impressive after that sentence.
When you include social intelligence and creativity,
What creativity? All your theories are stolen from me, Marx or Kevin MacDonald. Name one original valuable thought you’ve ever had.
Let me be clear – you aren’t smarter than me puppy even by conventional IQ scores. Thats all I will say about my IQ.
If your IQ were as high or higher than mine, you’d simply post your WAIS-IV results so the fact that you haven’t is proof you scored about 130 at the most.
Not that there’s anything wrong with that. Anything in the triple digits is respectable.
Autism is such a terrible condition because it robs the person of the ability to judge other people. I hate doing math and never bothered reading my stats textbook in college, but that doesn’t mean if I was forced to do it I wouldn’t pepper this blog in autistic math comments and then robo-losers like Ganzir and ?~} would cry about how intelligent I must be.
I scored in the top 5% in math in my country with 3 weeks of studying math.
The only reason you scored in the top 5% is because in your country. the upper class don’t attend regular schools, so you’re the top 5% among the lower class, or top 10% among the overall population, which sounds about right, given what I’ve observed about your math IQ.
And you’ve had more math practice than I have given that you work in finance. Outside of estimating IQ, I find math hella boring too.
But the ability to apply very basic math to novel problems is an excellent measure of g.
No the test is mandatory for all students. And I work in a part of finance now, that involves no math. Even when I was a banker I used very low level math. I probably did more advanced math as a 14 year old in high school than when I was a banker.
You don’t find math boring. Stop lying. Its obvious that was the only part of psychology you were good at – psychometrics.
I hardly studied psychometrics in university, that occurs at the graduate level. I only got a BA.
I do find math in general boring but I have a deep love for statistics which started at age 12 when I read Wechsler and then increased years later when a Promethean explained how I could apply regression to my Oprah obsession.
99% of 12 year olds that love statistics are on the autism spectrum. Thats all Im going to say further on this.
Realistically it’s probably closer to 50%. There’s a lot of completely neurotypical gifted kids who love statistics.
“If your IQ were as high or higher than mine, you’d simply post your WAIS-IV results so the fact that you haven’t is proof you scored about 130 at the most.”
Horrible social reasoning as usual. I wouldn’t post IQ scores just to prove I’m smarter than someone, let alone you.
Yes because you’re so concerned about the feelings of others 🙂
No because anyone with even basic social intelligence knows that that isn’t really a way to win a debate. If I say youre wrong about the g factor or cold winter theory or whatever, posting my IQ score is irrelevant and basically autism.
“The Philosophersaid:July 30, 2022 at 9:04 pm
I’ve never stated my IQ because its obvious to people without autism. For example, this ?~} commenter has severe autism and thats obvious to me, but he won’t be able to tell my IQ because that part of his brain never developed.
Let me be clear – you aren’t smarter than me puppy even by conventional IQ scores. Thats all I will say about my IQ. So I don’t know where you got that 120 IQ estimate from. When you include social intelligence and creativity, I’m considered by most people to present comparatively to you as an adult whereas Ganzir and ?~} would likely present as imbeciles or children to most people, even if they know how to do math.
The best analysis of my abilities is Marsha’s comments, not because she has the highest IQ, but because she doesn’t have autism.”
You are more infantile as an adult than I was at the age of six. Your entire mentally retarded weltanschauung is based on preschool stereotypes e.g.:”The children who play musical instruments and draw pretty pictures are the most creative. The children who like boring numbers are boring uncreative nerds.” You deny the link between success in some of the most cognitively demanding domains of human study and creativity. You are a pathetic hysterical perpetually bawling and squealing crack baby trapped in a manlet’s body and that is how you are perceived by almost everyone who knows you.
I have never read Marsha’s analysis of your abilities. I am certain that it was purely qualitative and contained none of what you consider ” scary autistic numbers”. I remember that she has a 1590 score on the pre-1995 SAT. On the sole basis of that 1590 score anyone who isn’t completely retarded can conclude that her IQ is at least one standard deviation higher than yours.
feminine brained people know how to cooperate with their peers better and masculine brains are able to better push their agendas.
my brain has a consistent pattern of attaining both categories of judgments thus making me a good candidate for success in terms of being useful for others while also exploring what needs to be done for myself!
obama, reagan, carter, ford, nixon, lbj all from lower backgrounds than clinton, but still much higher than oprah’s.
Obama wasn’t. He lived in Hawaii and his grandmother was VP of a bank, his dad was a Harvard economist, his mom was a PhD and he inherited over half a million.
Social intelligence is barely related to normal intelligence. Look at Puppy. He even admitted people tell him he acts like a child despite a 135 IQ.
Me acting like a child has nothing to do with my social intelligence. If you had social intelligence you’d know that.
No psychologist or person that studies intelligence agrees with the above comment.
women act like children 99% of the time and have a higher social IQ than men. whats the point Pill?
Women don’t act like children they act like women you idiot.
Pill stop with the schizophrenia bullshit already its a metaphor children are imaginative and lack logical or rational usage ability and so do children!
you are too dumb to realize that you are too dumb which makes explaining things to you worthless.
senegal is unique in that it is neither a theocracy nor a secular democracy and it is the only muslim country where sufis are the majority. i think this explains why its homicide rate may be trustworthy.
but also senegalese may be genetically distinct from other west africans because bordering sahara.
it has been said the dems are the mommy party and the GOP is the daddy party.
it could be said christianity is a mommy religion. islam is a daddy religion.
it’s interesting how in morocco men will hold hands and put their arms around one another and it isn’t gay…because even it were gay nothing would happen because that shit is haram.
and how in southern france and italy men will kiss each other and it’s totally no homo.
as i’ve said i’m in favor of prisoners and ex-felons voting. (this is not allowed in the US.) and i think people who oppose this can’t claim to be small “d” democrats.
but it’s interesting…a lot of criminals would vote libertarian…because they’ve experienced state power personally.
i think most americans (at least) would prefer to be dirt poor than to be told what to do at the point of a gun.
how charitable is charity at the point of a gun?
this is why socialism per se is tarded, but national socialism like iceland is ideal.
the soviet union and the idpol people have the same project in a sense…
they’re both trying to shoehorn human nature into their moral theory.
human nature was expressed succinctly by tom snyder.
when i call my kid an idiot, it’s totally different from when you call my kid an idiot.
at one time in the recent past and despite the hulking beasts that are icelandic men…
icelandic men had the longest life expectancy of any men.
the answer is YES!
icelandic is basically old norse and iceland has its own version of Académie Française…
Why do you let him use the term national socialism (and praise it) and you ban everytime I use that term?
I try to ban it with him too but he uses it so often that sometimes it slips through the cracks when I’m feeling more lenient or when I don’t read carefully enough
Why dont you like the term?
just say “hindutva” and peepee will approve it because trans-indian. sad.
you can take the wypipo out of the nazi, but you can’t take the nazi out of the wypipo.
according to some commenter on unz there were a few south asians in germany during the nazi period and they were treated just like native germans…
so this idea that the nazis targeted gypsies…
why would you do that karen?
according to some commenter on unz there were a few south asians in germany during the nazi period and they were treated just like native germans…
so this idea that the nazis targeted gypsies…
why would you do that karen?
it’s a scary moment because one might expect that the liotta character was about to hit his wife…but he never did…i think this is “not done” among cosa nostra.
btw, liotta was “italian face”. that is he was adopted by italian americans but had no italian ancestry.
he died in his sleep in the dr a few months ago iirc.
reminds me of this vid…what upper class really is in america…not very rich a lot of the time…
and there were ethnic clubs…there’s even a building in pdx with a built-in sign “german american association”…
And Puppy Im going to be very blunt. But just because you have a 135IQ doesn’t mean you would be good at anything other than doing math.
With you, its obvious you would be horrible at doing art, music or psychology or any other non-mathematical task. The g factor theory is wrong. Just wrong. You and Ganzir have about as much chance of being a good used car salesman as Trump has of being an astrophysicist. I think the chances of Ganzir and this ?~} commenter of getting laid are remote.
When will you accept the G factor is only related to analytical tasks?
I’ve never tried selling cars, but when I worked in a grocery store in high school, I was far and away the best fish sales person on staff and there was lots of competition because everyone wanted to stand around listening to music in the sea food section (and getting free samples from the chef). So once again, you’re not the great judge of character you think you are.
g theory is correct but some mental abilities are so weakly correlated with g that they’re not noticeable anecdotally. And some behaviors that you mistake for abilities are actually personality traits.
You might have been the best fish salesman because you were the only fish salesman and the store was the only place that sold fish in a 1000 mile radius. But if you are put in a competitive situation even with people with much lower IQ than you, I always expect the neurotypical person to outsell you.
And you’d be very wrong and the reason you’re wrong is because like most schizophrenics, you rely on black or white thinking. You assume that because I have some autistic traits , I must fit every autistic stereotype. You make the same mistake with race (wrongly assuming the very smart Afro was the dumbest person here, or assuming every successful black is a Jewish puppet or assuming everything is a Jewish conspiracy).
Your schiz allows you to see the big picture (which is why you did well on my picture test) but you’re blind to details and nuance (autists tend to have the opposite problem). You need BOTH types of thinking to be truly brilliant.
Afro was truly dumb. He said Macron was a great candidate LOL. What more evidence do you need?
You don’t have ‘some autistic traits’. You have all the autistic traits, even the relatively rare ones like photographic memory.
My mother thinks I’m autistic and argued with a neuropsychologist who strongly disagreed. The main reason I don’t consider myself autistic is that I always fit into a social group growing up and I engaged in a lot of pretend play and creative hobbies. Indeed the Indian woman who gave me the WISC-R also interviewed me and said I’d never have a problem making friends. She wasn’t looking for autism since it wasn’t on the radar in those days though she did notice I lacked eye contact.
The reason you liked pretend play and had some social skills despite your autism is because youre gay. You like to pretend your a woman sometimes. This means youre gay not neurotypical.
No, not gay although I had a lot of feminine interests so my friend and I would spend 12 hours a day just making up soap operas with our Star Wars figures. It’s possible I’m genetically gay but by some lucky accident of environment. never became attracted to males.
But no one ever called me “faggot” growing up despite my feminine interests and it’s because I don’t have gay mannerisms or lisp.
I have a half-Jewish friend who I did think was gay when I first met him but he’s straight as an arrow and is constantly having sex with his girlfriend who is far better looking than he is. So sexuality is complex, and an example of where your big picture shoot from the hip thinking fails
I also had non-feminine creative interests like writing horror stories. I even have a horror screenplay I wrote at 13.
Why would I want to sell used cars?
ALL gay genes have spread from south asia.
the gayest men alive are south asian muslims.
LOL! Mug of Pee is so brave from the anonymity of a computer. I bet in real life he’s the World’s biggest pussy.
You guys should have a boxing match to raise money for your respective political positions (candidates you support etc.)
dont underestimate Mug though Pumpkin dem Boomers have that old man strength that is incomparable nowadays lol.
they let the british fuck them in the ass for 200 years and then they let the hindus fuck them in the ass…
and LOADED!
old white women are stronger than 20 year old south asian men.
sad.
Because they’re tiny
Mug i would knock your ass out silly in a fight you uncoordinated Boomer. stop spending so much time on the Internet and finally get some exercise sometime.
Quit the bitchin imma make it in a second
The smartest President in the 20th century is Nixon…
No it was LOADED and he was born on a peculiar day in 1995 just enough years to make a mark on this corrupt world *emojis*
Nixon was personally vetted by Alan Dulles, a fascist, to be part of the establishment. Bizarrely Nixon would be considered a democrat today.
he’s the second smartest since 1900. the smartest is TR. and it’s not even close. TR was a freak.
Yeah I read a biography of TR. I’m not sure I’d call him very smart though. He just had a lot of curiosity.
I wonder what Dulles would think of jewish rule. He didn’t really care about the holocaust and appointed ex-nazis to be part of the west German government. There is no doubt Dulles was a straight out fascist but maybe more like the Italian fascists rather than the national socialists in Germany.
I like how people here think Pill is actually socially intelligent in anyway. it just shows how stupid most of you must be for worshipping what he says.
Pill is like a cult leader and almost all the commenters here are sheep for taking his word as credible.
Loaded, you’re retarded.
I am retarded and you are a fucking sheep clown motherfucker who cant grasp reality without some idiot on the Internet telling you how to live it?
wow. go eat a cockmeat sandwich you homo troll.
Its all relative Loaded. Compared to the average person I’m not particularly socially intelligent. But compared to autists I’m way more socially intelligent.
Theres a definite trade off between socially intelligent and being good at math (with the exception of jews).
I’m decent at math so as a result my social intelligence is not the best. I developed much more slowly than my peers.
At the same time I’m on the schiz spectrum so I’m not robbed of basic awareness. At the very least I’m able to tell that Bill Clinton and Donald Trump are geniuses in social intelligence, whereas someone like Puppy is so far out at sea, he actually says Trump has autism. LOL.
I never said he had autism. What I said (and Lion endorsed this) was he might be on the autism spectrum. What I meant by that is parents of autistics regress to the mean but are often a little strange themselves. Thus it seemed Trump’s weirdness (strange hair, political incorrectness, KFC eating) was a less extreme form of Baron’s alleged autism.
Lion has a theory that autistics are just people lacking the instinct to mimic the group which is why severe autists never learn to speak; mild autists learn to speak but never learn social norms. Thus my theory was that relatives of mild autists might understand social norms but ignore them and that was Trump’s whole brand (flouting political correctness, defying the deep state etc)
Nothing about my theory precluded Trump from being a social genius, because a borderline autist simply lacks social obedience not understanding. Similarly a mild autist can still be a verbal genius because they only lack the social component of communication, not the linguistic part.
I’m decent at math so as a result my social intelligence is not the best. I developed much more slowly than my peers.
Finally, he admits he’s socially retarded.
so you like to exploit autistic people? makes you seem like such a good and caring person wow.
Pill i never thought you would stoop lower than you previously had but it seems like you keep going further and further down a really decrepit hole of failure.
Stop lying. You said he had autism and his son being autistic was the proof. You blogged about it. Trump definitely understands social norms but he manipulates them or basically shits all over them when the circumstance demands it. If he shit all over social norms all the time, he basically would be closer to a crazy person than an autistic person puppy.
Being disobedient is not an autistic trait. Being obedient is an autistic trait.
Plenty of schiz or criminals are also disobedient, does that make them on the spectrum too? You just completely lack intuition. You were probably one of those people at the start of his first run for president who dismissed him as a joke figure or that he “wasn’t presidential” or wrote him off immediately.
If I asked you whether him declaring a ban on muslims would help him or stop him from winning, you would have said the latter because you don’t understand people. CNN would say declaring a ban on muslims would end your political career not because it actually would, but because they’re jews. You don’t get any of this.
Stop lying. You said he had autism and his son being autistic was the proof. You blogged about it. Trump definitely understands social norms but he manipulates them or basically shits all over them when the circumstance demands it. If he shit all over social norms all the time, he basically would be closer to a crazy person than an autistic person puppy.
Being disobedient is not an autistic trait. Being obedient is an autistic trait.
You’re basing that on your dumb theory that autists were bred to be slaves (hey I found your one original thought) which is different from Lion’s theory that autists lack the instinct to mimic the group. In fact being a slave would lead to HIGHER social IQ because domesticated wolves (dogs) are socially much smarter than their wild counterparts.
Plenty of schiz or criminals are also disobedient, does that make them on the spectrum too?
No, but most of them don’t have autistic relatives either. The same behavior can have multiple causes.
You just completely lack intuition.
Who died and made you the arbiter of intuition? You’re just guessing like everyone else.
You were probably one of those people at the start of his first run for president who dismissed him as a joke figure or that he “wasn’t presidential” or wrote him off immediately.
As did most of the pundits.
If I asked you whether him declaring a ban on muslims would help him or stop him from winning, you would have said the latter because you don’t understand people.
Oh God no. Even at the time I thought that was incredibly politically savvy, but it also made me realize what a Zionist tool he was.
CNN would say declaring a ban on muslims would end your political career not because it actually would, but because they’re jews. You don’t get any of this.
No I actually get it much much better than you do. Liberal Jews don’t like his Islamophobic rhetoric (or pretend not to) because they fear such nativism could eventually be turned against them, but conservative Jews, who want the U.S. to do Israel’s fighting for them, love rhetoric that pits Americas against Muslims. Why do you think Sheldon Adelson backed him my little dumb-dumb?
You actually think Trump’s social genius overpowered the entire Jewish establishment and they were just too dumb to realize they were giving him billions of dollars in free media? That’s how dumb you are.
“You’re basing that on your dumb theory that autists were bred to be slaves”
This is the correct explanation. Your dumb theory is obsessed with pruning which is a MECHANISM, not an EXPLANATION. It doesn’t explain why human evolution selected technically proficient conformist man-children. Mine does. We both know it certainly wasn’t sexual selection.
“As did most of the pundits.”
Yes puppy the ones allowed on tv by jews. Great company to be in. Great intuition demonstrated….
“You actually think Trump’s social genius overpowered the entire Jewish establishment and they were just too dumb to realize they were giving him billions of dollars in free media? ”
Correct. Basically. He had some powerful jews in his corner from the start like Carl Icahn and Kushner’s father but the vast majority of the jewish media tried their best to cut him down because they hate nationalists even more than socialists. Its helpful to see that the media was really reacting to trump rather than actively promoting trump. Everytime trump said something politically incorrect they jumped on it and tried explain why it was evil.
They organised a press conference where 7 women accused Trump of raping and sexually abusing them while crying on tv and all the media blasted it out. No politician except for Trump would survive that. None. Not even Bill Clinton.
Then they realised the Access Hollywood tape and Trump actually turned it to his advantage by bashing Bill Clinton as a sexual predator the next night.
Then they went into stupid territory with the Russia Russia stuff. I’m not even sure a committed CNN viewer like you even bought that.
I said Trump is a GENIUS. You said he was autistic. Case closed. You have horrible judgement. You should retract your blog article on Trump and just simply admit you got it wrong.
This is the correct explanation. Your dumb theory is obsessed with pruning which is a MECHANISM, not an EXPLANATION. It doesn’t explain why human evolution selected technically proficient conformist man-children. Mine does. We both know it certainly wasn’t sexual selection.
The mere fact that it occurs in only 2% of the population suggests it WASN’T selected but is a disorder. If anything it’s non-autism that was selected for via self-domestication of our species. We know that domesticated animals are more socially intelligent than their wild counterparts. And autists are the OPPOSITE of conformist. Why do you think you see so many on HBD blogs? When society says men should be interested in hockey, they’re busy obsessing over train schedules. What master does that even serve? That’s not conformity, pill.
Correct. Basically. He had some powerful jews in his corner from the start like Carl Icahn and Kushner’s father
And Bibi and AIPAC (the most powerful lobby), and many media sources (Jewish owned or otherwise) like Alex Jones and Breitbart news & the National Enquirer that wrote puff pieces claiming he had a 160 IQ and would buy scandalous stories about him just to burry them. It was mostly just the dying establishment media that opposed him & even they gave him constant coverage. It was the media (Mark Burnette & NBC ) that built him up in the first place via his show THE APPRENTICE, and then when he ran for President, they gave him $2 billion in free coverage.
but the vast majority of the jewish media tried their best to cut him down because they hate nationalists even more than socialists.
But they love Israel even more than they hate either and no President was more slavish to Israel than trump, with the possible exception of George W. Bush. Trump even attacked other politicians for not being pro-Israel enough. He attacked Jewish elites for not being pro-Israel enough. If he actually believes that then it seems a little autistic but he could just be pandering (or is being blackmailed from his Epstein party days)
Its helpful to see that the media was really reacting to trump rather than actively promoting trump. Everytime trump said something politically incorrect they jumped on it and tried explain why it was evil.
That’s called journalism you dumbass. The job of the press is to challenge the President not to suck his dick like you do.
Banning an entire religion & stigmatizing them all as terrorists just to please his Zionist masters is evil. Lying every 5 seconds about everything from your votes to your crowd size to your TV ratings is evil.
They organised a press conference where 7 women accused Trump of raping and sexually abusing them while crying on tv and all the media blasted it out. No politician except for Trump would survive that. None. Not even Bill Clinton.
I agree he’s a social brilliant in some ways and had he been re-elected or even challenged the establishment in a meaningful way, I might agree he’s a social genius. But instead he just sucked Bibi’s dick until Bibi dumped him or the dementia patient that kicked his ass. Still, it’s impressive that someone so politically incorrect with no political background became President at all, so one could argue he’s a social genius
Youre socially retarded. If you can’t see the media was throwing the kitchen sink against trump you won’t see anything.
Bibi wasn’t for trump initially. There were other republican candidates. I mean, seriously, do you think Hilary also wouldn’t have gotten Bibi’s support?
“The mere fact that it occurs in only 2% of the population suggests it WASN’T selected but is a disorder. ”
It was non-existent 100 years ago and its a growing thing. Plenty more people are on the spectrum than 2%. I never said the breeding programme was wildly successful. I just said it exists. Their ideal citizen is someone like Bruno who can do all the technical stuff for low wages and still be dumb enough to vote for Macron.
And where is the evidence domesticated dogs are socially smarter than wolves? Post the evidence.
Youre socially retarded. If you can’t see the media was throwing the kitchen sink against trump you won’t see anything.
I did see them throwing the kitchen sink at him, but unlike like you, I also saw them throwing $2 billion in free media at him, including covering his entire rallies unedited and letting him phone in to talk shows when traditionally politicians had to show up in person. If they were really so against him, why not starve him of attention completely? That’s how they destroyed Ron Paul who ran on ending Middle east wars.
I’m not denying an anti-Trump bias, but they also have a pro-ratings bias and a pro-Israel bias and Trump appealed to both. You could say Trump was a social genius by getting such high ratings the media would want to cover him, but let’s not pretend the media declared all out war. Their attitude was he’s bad for America but he’s good for business, and they would exaggerate how much they hated him to appeal to their liberal audience. They also would do so in self-defense because Trump began calling them “fake news”.
Bibi wasn’t for trump initially. There were other republican candidates. I mean, seriously, do you think Hilary also wouldn’t have gotten Bibi’s support?
Yes he would have supported Hillary but his first choice was likely Trump because Trump shared his hatred for Obama and the Iran nuclear deal. Had it not been for smart people like Tucker Carlson talking sense into Trump, Bibi probably would have manipulated Trump into a war with Iran. So while he’s as social genius at entertaining the crowd & branding himself and others, he lacks higher level geopolitical smarts (or maybe he does get it but is shamelessly pandering to Sheldon Adelson or maybe Bibi has some Epstein related kompromat and maybe the media knows but deflected attention by pretending Putin was the one blackmailing him)
It was non-existent 100 years ago and its a growing thing. Plenty more people are on the spectrum than 2%.
What is growing are the number of people DIAGNOSED as autistic and that has a lot to do with broadening the criteria by which one can be diagnosed and increasing awareness. In the past you had to be a full blown Rain Man to be diagnosed as autistic while today, Elon Musk could get diagnosed. Most of the people who are considered autistic today would just have been considered weirdos in the past or perhaps misdiagnosed as schizophrenic, especially childhood schizophrenics.
But whether autism itself has increased; there’s no strong evidence either way. If I had to guess I’d say there’s been some increase caused by high tech becoming more important, thus increasing the ease with which techies breed and breed with one another. This combines with mutation load (fathers having kids older)
I never said the breeding programme was wildly successful. I just said it exists. Their ideal citizen is someone like Bruno who can do all the technical stuff for low wages and still be dumb enough to vote for Macron.
LOL! That’s insane. There’s no conspiracy to create more autistic people. Now it would be useful to elites to have more technical geniuses who don’t question authority, but the way to achieve that is not by selecting for social stupidity (which can have unpredictable consequences) but by selecting for servility. James Watson thinks this may have happened in India and Indians are probably more socially intelligent than expected from their IQs, which make sense because domestication raises social IQ.
And where is the evidence domesticated dogs are socially smarter than wolves? Post the evidence.
In this study, we found that wolves who were raised by humans do not show these same skills, whereas domestic dog puppies only a few weeks old, even those that have had little human contact, do show these skills. These findings suggest that during the process of domestication, dogs have been selected for a set of social-cognitive abilities that enable them to communicate with humans in unique ways.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12446914/
“Banning an entire religion & stigmatizing them all as terrorists just to please his Zionist masters is evil.”
Or maybe it’s because they commit more terrorism than any other religious group?
Are you fucking stupid. This is very frustrating. I’ve been here 5 years explaining how the media works and youre basically on a Level 1 primitive level of understanding of how the media works….you said they care about ratings….do you have any idea how low your IQ must be to say something like that?? They dont give a fuck about ratings. None. Its propaganda Puppy. Youve realised that right? The aim of propoganda isn’t to get ratings LOL! Oh my god youre so dumb.
“LOL! That’s insane. There’s no conspiracy to create more autistic people. ”
Yeah whatever Puppy. Its called breeding for servility. Just like you misinterpreted that social cognition of dogs study. The study was about breeding dogs better able to communicate with humans. Wolves still retain intra-species social skills. Saying the fact that wolves can’t communicate with humans is a sign of low social IQ misdefines social IQ as only applicable to inter-species behaviour.
Are you fucking stupid. This is very frustrating. I’ve been here 5 years explaining how the media works
You’ve been on here for 5 years explaining how YOU think the media works, but seeing as you’re an idiot, your explanations just serve as entertainment for us to laugh at, not wisdom we need to acquire.
and youre basically on a Level 1 primitive level of understanding of how the media works….you said they care about ratings….do you have any idea how low your IQ must be to say something like that?? They dont give a fuck about ratings. None. Its propaganda Puppy. Youve realised that right? The aim of propoganda isn’t to get ratings LOL! Oh my god youre so dumb.
Wow you’re so incredibly stupid it’s sad. What do you think funds this propaganda they care so much about if not ratings? Oh I forgot you believe Jews just print money off the printing press and don’t have to worry about earnings. Why do they show commercials every 5 minutes if they don’t care about the ad revenue of ratings? Saying the media doesn’t care about ratings is like saying corporations don’t care about money. Utterly asinine. Now they may care MORE about propaganda than they care about ratings but then why did they give Trump $2 billion in free media coverage and why did even CNN show his entire rallies unedited? Why not starve him of attention like they did Ron Paul? Either they love ratings more than they hate Trump or they love Trump and were trying to help him? You can’t have it both ways dumbass.
Yeah whatever Puppy. Its called breeding for servility.
No it’s called the computer revolution gave rise to silicon valley causing a bunch of techies to interbreed. The fact that it might have produced more autism is just a coincidence. Only a bat shit crazy Qtard would think there was a master plan to breed autists.
Just like you misinterpreted that social cognition of dogs study. The study was about breeding dogs better able to communicate with humans.
No it was about how domestication makes the domesticated better at reading the mind of their masters. Dogs and humans have the same masters: Humans, so it stands to reason that domesticated humans like their canine counterparts would evolve better Theory of Mind, not autism.
You lost the debate and your theories are WRONG.
LOADED is:
a. peepee
b. peepee’s brother
c. peepee’s husband
d. both c and b because pakistanis are into that
e. an actual negrophilic pakistani midget
The smartest politican of the 20th century was a British politican.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enoch_Powell
dasss bullshit peepee.
se asians are good at badminton.
tiny chinapeople are good at ping pong and gymnastics.
india has won 35 olympic medals. pakistan 10. thailand 35. indonesia 37.
the republic of ireland has won as many medals as india.
but the greatest squash player ever was a pakistani supposedly.
ping pong is more of a mental sport & tropical countries can’t compete in those.
I had this friend when I was in London in my 20s who basically thought the only way you could be high IQ is if you were good at math. Back then I didn’t know anything about intelligence or IQ or whatever. Some of the autistic commenters remind me of him but the guy at least was not autistic. I should have said, “so by your reckoning Rain Man is smarter than George Soros or Einstein?”
Cinematic depiction of Ganzir, Bruno and ?~}:
(Just to be clear, you are not the Tom Cruise character in this clip!)
He has the social skills not to get on the plane and watching his favourite program when he wants to. In a normal family setting, I don’t know about your travelers and Romani communities, Philo no offense intended; but it’s a huge accomplishment.
thailand has 65m people. india has 1,400m people. yet same number of olympic medals AND some of those are by anglo-indians and 12 are in field hockey, a girls’ sport in the rest of the world.
football invented in blighty.
cricket…
bridge invented in blighty.
the british are great at inventing games, horrible at playing them…because gay…just not as gay as south asians…
sad.
if black women aren’t objectively hideous…if it’s just “racism”…then why are mulattos almost always prettier than black women
and why do even black women actually prefer black men with a higher white admixture?
is lolo jones a 39 year old virgin…or just a lesbian?
i’d love to de-virgin her.
everybody shut up! i have monkey pox!
Don’t make fun, Mug of Pee
even God cant judge me even though he dont like no ugly….one day ill look so good most dykes will fuck me.
so you’re transitioning to 6’3″? i didn’t know that was possible.
Actually it is possible but it’s extremely painful
i dont need to be 6 3 once i finish my weight loss journey by the end of the year i will look good enough for most dykes to fuck me!
youve definitely seen pics of the old and new me Mug and PP you have to admit i used to look good and can achieve good looks regardless of my South Indian predisposition.
when i was 12 years old i used to think the same.
women are total racists when it comes to height.
i am ACTUALLY 6’1.25″ as measured by myself…the doctor tells me i’m 6’2″.
but 6’3″ is the magic number.
AND it’s about the proportions too, not just the height.
so it’s impossible to transition.
sad.
but i have the upper body of a 7′ tall man…sexy!
in fact: the south in general isn’t what peepee thinks it is. it used to be. but today the average wypipo in the former confederacy have the highest standard of living of any wypipo in the country.
the south should not be confused with appalachia, which is still the poorest part of the US and almost 100% white.
Mrs Duncan is an example of a Southern woman who is not low class
i mean it’s commonly assumed that the solid south (solid for democrats) switched with the 1964 civil rights act, but that’s only half the story.
the other half is the miraculous economic upward mobility of the white south since 1964. and the steep economic decline of much of the former union (the northern/yankee states).
this is why blacks have been moving back to the south on balance.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/01/14/black-migration-south/
unregulated capitalists are WAY worse for blacks than white racists.
chris rock alluded to the phenomenon and peepee wouldn’t approve it.
black americans are just as divided by class as white americans.
you can see it in this vid:
poor wypipo are more likely to belong to the kkk or be public about their racism, but…
in reality genuine racism is less the lower one’s SES.
rich wypipo have a public face and a private face.
How do you know since it’s private
real estate is just a version of banking, but without all the regulations.
https://www.biography.com/news/michael-phelp-perfect-body-swimming
my dad was a very good swimmer…like…VERY good!
but he gave up on the olympics because it was too much work.
i mean you literally had to throw up every day…
he had a long torso too…just not as long as mine.