In my last post I cited evidence showing South African Coloureds are 19% Bantu, 20% White, 8% East Asian, 22% South Asian, 28% Bushmen and 3% Southeast Asian. From this data I estimated Bushmen have a genetic IQ of 67 (UK norms), which if true, would be the lowest racial mean ever discovered.
However commenter “Some guy” provided alternative ancestry estimates which made me want to replicate my results using a different dataset.
One major study states:
…nearly 75,000 autosomal SNPs that could be compared with populations represented in the International HapMap Project and the Human Genome Diversity Project. Analysis by means of both the admixture and linkage models in STRUCTURE revealed that the major ancestral components of this population are predominantly Khoesan (32-43%), Bantu-speaking Africans (20-36%), European (21-28%) and a smaller Asian contribution (9-11%), depending on the model used. This is consistent with historical data.
Using the midpoint of each of these ranges, Coloureds genetic IQ = 0.375(Bushmen genetic IQ) + 0.28 (Bantu genetic IQ) + 0.245(White genetic IQ) +01(Indian genetic IQ)
Substituting my estimates for the genetic IQ of each of these South African ethnic groups (except for Bushmen which is least known):
85 = 0.375(Bushmen genetic IQ) + 0.28(80) + 0.245(98) + 0.1(92)
85 = 0.375(Bushmen genetic IQ) + 22.4 + 24.01 + 9.2
85 = 0.375(Bushmen genetic IQ) + 55.61
85 – 55.61 = 0.375(Bushmen genetic IQ)
29.39 = 0.375(Bushmen genetic IQ)
78.37 = Bushmen genetic IQ
This is much higher than the IQ 67 I reported based on somewhat different admixture levels. Of course in this study the data was directly reported while in the other one, I had to estimate it from a chart, though I did so very carefully.
More research is needed to determine whether Bushmen are a uniquely challenged population (genetic IQ 67) or whether they are just typical sub-Saharans (IQ of roughly 80) or somewhere in between. Answering this question is the closest we have come to knowing how smart the very first members of our species were.
Recently my processing speed and working memory have been measured at IQ 75. My g is still 125. The variability is super high. I think I have burnout. Certain thinking takes real effort. I don’t think it’s permanent.
what is a borderline wm like pp?
I think to think he’s just fucking with everyone.
the wiki on group selection has a painting at its beginning. the title of the painting is Blackcocks.
the black grouse is also called the blackcock.
yanis varoufakis: greece can’t pay its debt. some of it must be forgiven.
klaus schwab: do you know what time is it?
yanis varoufakis: no. what do you mean?
klaus schwab: time to un-pimp zee auto. jaaaa….
https://tradingeconomics.com/greece/government-debt-to-gdp
And the germans buy all the greek’s thrash bonds anyway. So much for your 4th reich theory.
Bushmen look mongloid almost. Definitely more asiatic than bantus.
nein!
south africa’s coloreds aren’t the same as cape coloreds. it’s the cape coloreds who are plurality bushman. and “khoesan” should be hyphenated. there’re two peoples, the koi and the san.
are they?
nein!
south africa’s coloreds in general aren’t the same as cape coloreds.
are they?
“colored” under apartheid did not just mean cape coloreds.
did it?
interesting that “kaffir” (a word borrowed from muslim slavers) is now like “nigger”. but colored is still socially acceptable. just like in the US referring to blacks as “coloreds” had become offensive, but now non-whites are referred to with more than twice as many syllables with “people of color”.
it’s the stupidity stupid.
it’s the cape coloreds who are plurality bushman. the reason why the cape coloreds are koi-san is because when the dutch landed there were no bantus for like 500 miles in all directions.
and “khoesan” should be hyphenated. there’re two peoples, the koi and the san.
yes. the so called coloreds are quite heterogeneous. the cape coloreds are a more homogeneous more koi-san subgroup.
in other words if you see a study on “south african coloreds” you have to know which coloreds are actually being studied.
the cape coloreds are also distinguished by their native language, afrikaans. and as i’ve posted so many times the afrikaans speakers scored lower 50 years ago but now score about the same as english speakers.
does peepee believe the claim that jains pay 24% of india’s income tax?
they’re only 0.4% of india’s population.
the british aristocracy is an interbreeding population with no “converts” since 1982 i believe.
what’s its average IQ?
it was harold macmillan in 1984 famous for his winds of change speech which peepee refused to post because “racist”.
there are 809 heriditary peers. many of these were made peers because they were rich not because they were politicians or soldiers.
that’s more than 350.
soif they bred like pale jews how smart would they be 800 years later?
Why wont you let me insult loaded?