As a long time scholar of Oprah’s career, one of the most difficult moments came in 2006 after Oprah chose James Frey’s self-help drug addiction memoir A Million Little Pieces as her book club selection. At its peak, the book club was an unrivaled cultural phenomenon with each selection racing up the New York Times best-seller list, often to #1, and selling hundreds of thousands, if not millions of extra copies.
But the book club also bred resentment from elitists who may have subconsciously thought “How dare an overweight non-Ivy league dark skinned black woman who entertains housewives on daytime TV be the most important literary figure alive!”
For years critics had wished for a scandal to embarrass her & knock her of her high horse, & in 2006 it looked like they found one when it came to light that Frey had fabricated or embellished parts of memoir including the time he spent in prison.
At first Oprah stood by the author, saying that while parts of the memoir may be wrong, the spirit of the book was true, but the critics were having none of it. For the first time in a decade, Oprah found herself being attacked in the opinion pages of the major newspapers. Especially unrelenting was the omnipotent New York Times who had long been jealous that Oprah’s book’s club had usurped their review as the most influential literary force. Every day they would write another story about the Frey scandal and at one point they gave Oprah the Nixon treatment, asking “What did Oprah know and when did she know it?”
A dark day
I went to the internet to defend her, but the trolls were too many:
“This stupid woman never should have been on TV in the first place!” read one comment.
“Looks like someone made a monkey out of old Oprah,” read another.
At the time my coworkers were supposed to take me out for dinner to celebrate a promotion but I cancelled. I crawled into bed and pulled the covers over my head.
How could this have happened to the World’s biggest brained woman? Did I bet on the wrong horse? My whole life felt like one big waste of time.
And then I fell asleep as an ominous Thunder storm began roaring outside.
A new day
When I woke up, the sun shining as fresh air blew into my bedroom from the windows I forgot to close, and bird were chirping.
With great anxiety, I checked the internet.
Gone were all the nasty comments and vicious media coverage. They were replaced by people watching Oprah’s show in Chicago (where it had aired live that morning) and gushing:
“Oprah’s beating the living shit out of James Frey!”
“Oprah’s slaughtering Frey!”
The newspaper headlines were the same:
Oprah obliterates Frey
Queen of Alll Media Takes her Revenge
Oprah scolds Frey for betraying millions of readers
Even the New York Times was singing her praises!
What the hell happened I wondered? In an act of extraordinary genius, Oprah and her female staff had found a way to lure Frey and his publisher, the legendary New Yorker Nam Talese, onto her show as part of a panel discussing “Truth in America” but little did they know that they would be the sacraficial lambs.
Oprah walked Frey through every chapter of his book demanding he admit it was lies. At one point Oprah even got Frey to admit he had lied about his girlfriend hanging herself.
The studio audience moaned in agony
“Well one idea I had” Frey said, before Oprah cut him off. “That’s not an idea James, that’s a lie!”
“You conned us all!” she said, “you betrayed millions of readers”
“I’ve really been embarrassed by all this” Oprah kept saying, using a brilliant technique Chris Mathews calls Shining a Lantern on Your Problem.
Oprah then described a scene where Frey claimed to have had two root canals without novocaine. Frey claimed he wan’t sure.
“James that doesn’t make any sense,” said Oprah “that scene goes on in great detail for 2 or 3 pages and you say you had 2 root canals; so I ask again, were there 2 root canals?”
Frey was defeated. His beard mouth hanging open like dog shocked that its loving master had kicked it. Oprah seemed to see the pathetic face in the live TV monitor and knew her work was done. She cut to commercial, and brought out the publisher.
Oprah then lectured the elite publisher on the need for fact-checking and that the root canal story was an obvious red flag she should have caught.
Then Oprah invited elite columnists from the The New York Times and Washington Post onto the panel.
Richard Cohen praised Oprah for her courage in admitting she was wrong and course correcting and crowned her Mensch of the Year. Oprah insisted he say more, and which point Cohen began lecturing Talese to hire a fact checker! The publish turned bright red and when Oprah saw that the monitor had captured her humiliation too she cut to commercial.
Oprah ended the show by reading a quote from Michiko Kakutani about the importance of truth.
“I believe the truth matters” said Oprah as she furiously stormed off the set to thunderous applause, tossing Frey’s book for dramatic effect.
David Carr gushed: “By the time the program was over, she was surrounded by carnage, but she didn’t have a hair out of place. ”
Others gushed :”This was Old Testament Oprah! Making Frey burn in hell on live TV!”
Barbara Walters said “no one does the right thing all the time but Oprah does the right thing more often than anyone else.”
Packing a roughly 1900 cc brain size, Oprah had somehow turned the biggest scandal of her career into its biggest triumph.
“No one knows how to stage manage their image quite like Oprah,” said David Carr, “and I think her durability over time is that ability to stage manage”.
Another expert said “the sheer shrewdness of Oprah’s handling of the situation was reflected by the fact that her punishment of Frey, not her own judgement, became the story.”
I could hear my chemistry teacher’s definition of intelligence echoing in my mind:
The ability to adapt: To take whatever situation you’re in and turn it around to your advantage.
A few years later, publisher Nan Talese would eloquently lash out at Oprah in an attempt to save face.
Of course Oprah wouldn’t be Oprah if there wasn’t redemption. In the final season of her syndicated talk show, Oprah had Frey back on and apologized for being so tough on him and the two embraced.
Pumpkin Person 
Poor puppy hiding in bed after people insulted her god…
I just found Fenoopy on an incel website where he comments about all types of incel shit. I also realized in my hiatus as a PP commenter that I have a photographic memory.
The LORD has blessed me with things Ganzir wishes he had.
I’ve wished for a lot of things, but not once have I ever wished to be an incel website browser with dark triad traits and an inability to write a coherent paragraph.
Some of the guys on the incel websites and forums are extremely intelligent tbh.
Social IQ test: which is the ‘genetic superior’?
Not fair. You’re comparing the highest form of Caucasoid (Nordic) to the lowest most hybridized form of Mongoloid (Southeast Asian).
am i dark triad enough for you Pill.
Pumpkin what is Oprah cognitively strong in and what is she weak in? Pray tell if you care.
Never mind I actually dont care because she is irrelevant.
She is strongest in verbal, social, memory & executive function.
She is weaker at math and especially spatial.
Sounds like me. I bet her verbal fluency is great but the cognitive tilts do sound very accustomed to a female black brain so this would be of no surprise.
My IQ estimates for myself would be:
Fluid verbal:145
fluid spatial: 100
crystallized verbal: 110
crystallized spatial: 120
Loaded you dont have a 145 viq. In fact you might not even have a 45 viq.
First of all Pill youre a monkey banging on a type writer. Secondly its called fluid verbal IQ because it requires fluidity and expressiveness.
I am highly expressive detailed and goal directed in my writings. Youre more analytical harsh and have no direction in yours though Pill.
downing effect, see LOADED. sad.
Downing effect is only true if someone has a reason to believe their achievements are disproportionate to their mental ability. vice versa in my case.
Why do you think she’s weaker at spatial?
Just from observing her do spatial tasks on her talk show & from her self-reported problems with tasks I’d consider spatial.
Can you give specific examples?
She claims to have a fundamental problem with left and right. She claims she failed scenic design in college because she couldn’t draw a straight line with a ruler. Once asked “does anyone in America know how to use a can opener?” Claims to struggle with duvet covers. Claims to have struggled to sew an apron in home ec class in high school.
If a given a pure spatial test she’s probably below average, but because the types of spatial tests used on the WAIS are so g loaded, she’d probably score above average even on Block Design because her common sense (g) would compensate for her spatial lag.
Obama also seems to struggle spatially (see bowling performance) because both have tropical ancestry and spatial was likely selected to survive the ice age, hence highest in Northeast Asians and higher in men than in women (men did hunting & building)
To be fair, I never figured out can openers either. Fortunately, they have pull-tops now.
Isn’t what you say about spatial true for g too, though?
I have a theory that a high spatial minus verbal difference disposes for conformity and conservatism, while high verbal minus spatial does the opposite. It might have more to do with the testosterone and possible other hormones which cause those differences, though.
That’s more or less true. Many people who gravitate towards law and journalism have lopsided cognitive profiles in favor of verbal because sitting around and coming up with specious, turgid arguments (law and journalism) helps them cope with being low-t innumerates IMO. Pretty much every feminist is bad at math – or at least lacking in statistical intuition and inductive capacity.
I feel like people with pronounced nonverbal advantage are basically autistic, but I don’t know of any study that looks into their political beliefs. I would guess that their impaired theory of mind makes them more secular but less influenced by social pressure to be pc or “anti-racist.”
My intuition was wrong here. Apparently autists do tend to have big gaps, but not disproportionately in favor of nonverbal ability. I guess that doesn’t necessarily invalidate the theory, as people with huge gaps in that direction may be autistic a higher percentage of the time than vice versa. Is a V>>NV split more common in the neurotypical population perhaps?
I know with the large norming sample and scores being quantified in an M=100, SD=15 paradigm, deviation will cancel out. I just feel that in reality, there are more verbally gifted folks than otherwise, but of course it’s harder to recognize nonverbal intelligence, and people whose writings I read and podcasts/speeches I listen to are going to be V-savvy
She probably plays it up to be more sympathetic
@some guy
are you bengali and white? what a disturbing mixture lol.
“@some guy
are you bengali and white? what a disturbing mixture lol.”
I assume you meant to reply to someone else since I haven’t given any indication of ancestry.
Paul- people with autism tend to be libertarian in their political beliefs.
Was Ayn Rand autistic?
Pretty sure most female intellectuals and scientists before the late 20th century were autistic. Had to be
“At the time my coworkers were supposed to take me out for dinner to celebrate a promotion but I cancelled. I crawled into bed and pulled the covers over my head”.
You should have your testosterone levels measured.
PP’s converting me to an Oprah fan…
At first Oprah stood by the author, saying that while parts of the memoir may be wrong, the spirit of the book was true, but the critics were having none of it.
I bet Oprah only said this to help lure Frey back on. He probably thought Oprah would do damage control for him to protect herself.
SLY OPRAH!!
IMO a photographic memory is much more of a productive trait than a five to ten IQ point gain. I bet Oprah has a fantastic memory and possibly photographic in some senses.
Yes, Oprah’s mother’s cousin said Oprah was born with a photographic memory.
Interestingly, Oprah’s producer was discussing Oprah favorite things show where Oprah would have to surprise the audience with dozens of gifts so the show was very carefully choreographed. The producer said “Oprah has this amazing photographic memory so I knew she would have it down.”
I think she’d score perfect on Wechsler Digit Span.
PP what am i terrific at and what are things i am amazingly terrible at? i want feedback cognitively and personality wise.
“Photographic memory” is such an overused term. Maybe a few thousand people in all of human history have had a nearly perfect memory for SOMETHING, like their own life or books they read, but even their minds wouldn’t equal the perfect accuracy of a Xerox, and their exceptional ability at one type of memory probably wouldn’t transfer to other types.
And Oprah probably doesn’t even have that.
I’m sure there are people who would describe my memory as “photographic” because I scored 706 on HumanBenchmark verbal memory and can recite short paragraphs verbatim after reading them. It’s not. I forget things just like most people do.
Forgive and forget Ganzir forgive and forget.
I did not know about any of this. I just knew about the The Corrections story and now I realize I’m not sure I even remember that one well. Do you think Oprah is less innocent and more strategic than she wants us to believe? I mean, probably, but still, she seems kind of ruthless in this story.
PS: She wasn’t really over-weight at that time, as I can see. Just a very few kilos more than normal.
Do you think Oprah is less innocent and more strategic than she wants us to believe?
Yes.
I mean, probably, but still, she seems kind of ruthless in this story.
But I can’t blame her. Why should she take the fall when it was Frey who had lied and Talese who didn’t fact check.
All people are more ruthless and intolerant than they would want you to believe why would Oprah be an exception.
but i guess because youre gay and gender fluid you wouldnt really understand.
Wait, you are actually *more* ruthless and intolerant than you already appear to be? Color me impressed!
all of us are. it would be highly counterproductive to behave any other way.
Oprah, like Hillary Clinton, is red-pilled. It’s just easier for homely women to acquire power with left-wing personas.
I’m not sure what you mean by “red-pilled.” Like, aware of the harsh reality of this world?
It’s realizing that liberal elites are at least as greedy and dangerous as conservative elites.
Hillary is conservative but shameless and pathologically power-hungry. Oprah understands that black culture is largely toxic, but she has too much to lose.
I define conservative as, “not retarded about the nature and implications of intergroup difference.” At least behind closed doors.
Pill what do you think is a component of verbal IQ? and dont pull your dumbass autistic tricks on us anymore [redacted by pp, 2021-06-21]
VIQ is efficiently retrieving and elegantly arranging appropriate terms from an eclectic knowledge base. It’s deducing and/or remembering rules. Linguistics is kind of like its own math.
so basically heuristics and the application of concepts broken down into multiple categorical pieces of ideas?
What? It’s conveying information. That’s what language is for.
way to gaslight me then teffec. this will not be forgiven until the last day.
Terrible story, PP. I guess, tonight I need to watch some more of old Disney 💕
[redacted by pp, 2021-06-21] eric kaufmann explains the great awokening as just another prostestant heresy. it’s not marxist he says.
but it is. the woke are ANTI-marxists, but the explanation of the woke phenomenon is marxist…but it’s also nazi…which makes perfect sense as the nazis got their asses whipped by the commies and the anglo-capitalists…and then the commies got their asses whipped by the anglo-capitalists.
so the reigning ideology isn’t something as abstract as neo-liberalism.
it’s “the negation of the negation/absoulte negaitivity” as hegel would say.
that is, given that the nazis were pretty socialist, one might expect that the reigning ideology would hate on socialism AND on racism…
but because the reigning ideology is a dead man walking, it can’t even say this. so it has to replace class with race. in a senior moment (freudian slip) biden expressed the reigning ideology best…
[redacted by pp, 2021-06-21]
My belief is that all the people in this world suffer from extreme autism because of K-selection in our species. Some more than others obviously see Pill.
“At the time my coworkers were supposed to take me out for dinner to celebrate a promotion but I cancelled. I crawled into bed and pulled the covers over my head”
Man, what the hell. This is just weird lol
Pumpkin actually has a very high social IQ and insane empathy levels. It is kinda fucked we [redacted by pp, 2021-06-21]
only thing holding him back is his pride.
PP, do IQ tests measure intelligence directly or do they just indicate it?
For instance, if someone scores well on Math Olympiad questions, I’d say that proves their intelligence conclusively. However, if someone scores highly on the WAIS-IV, I don’t think I could conclusively say they’re intelligent, because I know high IQ people who aren’t that bright. Rather I’d say it just indicates intelligence.
IQ tests should have more complex reasoning tests rather than just many simple ones imo. The Cattell 3B has a set of verbal-logical puzzles at the end that I think better measures reasoning than the Similarities subtest.
Do Jonny Kim!
another yuge example of norms of reaction for AIDS patients.
PP wheres my comment about your T levels? I know you have low self esteem but theres no need to censor my comments because youre a low T ethiopian and im not motherfucker.
LOL
PP is German and…Egyptian? You owe it to Mankind to reproduce, PP. Bag a macrocephalic honey and beget high-empathy, HBD-aware horror-lovers. Put yourself out there! I’m asexual, so I probably have to rely on you to make a dent in the genome.
Im just joking PP. You know I like to play passive aggressive.
My spatial memory is high because it is photographic. I swear.
I’m surprised anything gets done for the american people in the US congress with the amount of corruption thats there. Did the founders have any anti-corruption provisions in the founding documents? I find it hard to believe they wouldn’t have foreseen private financing of elections turning into a oligarchy. It would be interesting seeing whether the US is the sole western democracy with unlimited campaign financing.
“Did the founders have any anti-corruption provisions in the founding documents?”
They did, and they even wrote it into the Bill of Rights, but I can’t tell you what it was because PP would redact it
Are mulattos as athletically gifted as pure blacks? I don’t see many doing well at the olympics but undoubtedly mulattos have higher IQs than blacks.
Doesn’t hybrid vigour suggest the mulattos should be getting the best of both worlds?
The last three Olympic gold medals in the decathlon have been won by multiracial fellows (Blasian and mulatto). Ben Simmons is arguably the best athlete of all time and mulatto. Tiger Woods is the GOAT golfer. Wouldn’t surprise me if there’s something about the combination of West African fast twitch fibers and European/Asian hand-eye coordination, kinesthetic intelligence, fluidity, and suppleness (not sure if all of these traits are stronger in these populations, though).
Tiger Woods isn’t the greatest. Jack Nichlaus is.
Nah. Tiger was much more dominant at his peak and has more wins and almost as many majors in a much more competitive era.
Bro if hybrid vigor was a thing, then Indians should be winning all the olympics.
I have hybrid vigor most certainly.
Oprah is less powerful than the least powerful Ashkenazi neocon so I don’t know why you rank her so highly.
If she were to call them out, she probably could inflict some damage, but she’d never do it because she knows the consequences. She knows her place as a court jester for soccer moms.
You’re confusing group power with individual power. As individuals most neocons are less powerful than Oprah (at her peak), but because there’s a large group of them, they can collectively overpower her. It’s like President Kennedy vs the CIA; as an individual he was far more powerful than most spooks, but collectively they were much more powerful.
It’s analogous to physical power. Mike Tyson might have been the best fighter alive, but he was no match for a mob of people.
Wait, Pepe, are you just using a general analogy, or are you seriously endorsing the hypothesis that glowies did in JFK?
Just a general analogy. I don’t know enough about U.S. history to opine intelligently.
The lowest neocon is more powerful than Oprah at her peak.
A neocon would disagree with you. Ben Shapiro wrote the following about a show Oprah did on the eve of the Iraq war:
Oprah Winfrey is the most powerful woman in America. She decides what makes the New York Times best-seller lists. Her touchy-feely style sucks in audiences at the rate of 14 million viewers per day. But Oprah is far more than a cultural force — she’s a dangerous political force as well, a woman with unpredictable and mercurial attitudes toward the major issues of the day. Her ignorant views and wacky reasoning shape the views of millions.
https://townhall.com/columnists/benshapiro/2003/03/19/the-oprah-schnook-club-n864513
Youre such a fucking idiot sometimes. You think a womens talk show host has the same power as a neocon? They can have her [redacted by pp, june 23, 2021] or blackmailed or removed from tv. You think they care about ratings?? Lol. They know the show is a circus.
And she can do the same to them. Oprah has billions of dollars and is friends with the Obamas. And only the most powerful neocons could do that to Oprah.
LOL youre saying she could order a hit on someone? HAHAHAHA. And haven’t you noticed? – The obamas have little to no power. Ask Michael Froman.
Oprah overpowered the neocons by causing Obama to beat neocon favorite Hillary in the Democratic primary & Obama had enormous power in inking the Iran nuclear deal over the extreme objections of Bibi, thus turning Israel into a partisan issue after decades of bipartisan support. And although Trump ripped it up, he stopped short of invading Iran. Even gangs can order hits on people. That doesn’t require much power.
Obama is not as powerful as some of the neocons otherwise we wouldn’t be talking about Iran or Syria or Libya at all and we’d be focusing on Obama’s real goals for foreign policy which I assume aren’t about protecting mother Israel. Anyways we’re talking about Oprah, not Obama. Oprah doesn’t have any power. There are literally other celebrities with more influence than her and she has no hard power.
Oprah doesn’t have that much power now because she older & largely retired & has spent so much of her power & the media is much more fragmented now then it was in Oprah’s day. But no entertainer will ever again have as much power as Oprah had 15 to 25 years ago. No one individual has much power. The reason neocons seems so powerful is because they’re a large group of powerful people united behind a common goal. Real power is at the group level which you should know as a conspiracy theorist.
If Oprah ever got into a confrontation with a single neocon at the height of her fame (and ‘power’ as you call it) she would back down. I’m not even sure Oprah is powerful enough to be even aware that the entire media industry is a mossad cesspit. The fact Oprah was allowed come out against the Iraq war publicly shows how little the neocons thought of her.
She wasn’t allowed to show one of her anti-war shows in some markets:
During part one of the show, a press conference held by George W. Bush and Colin Powell interrupted the show in many markets. An article in Buzzflash.com claimed the press conference was a deliberate attempt to silence debate:
Bush pre-empted Oprah for no reason other than to stop her broadcast regarding Iraq and insert his own propaganda!…In the middle of the show a “Special News Report” notice came up, then Peter Jennings announced Bush would be making a MAJOR announcement on Iraq. Then Bush and Powell came in and Bush summarized what Powell had said yesterday at the UN. He spent about 20 minutes in all…The Administration would have known the content and timing of today’s show because it is broadcast live and/or in the morning in many markets such as Oprah’s home base in Chicago. This was in such bad form I couldn’t believe it! I called Harpo Studios in Chicago to let them know and they said they had received a lot of phone calls. I said Oprah should tell her audience what happened and that I thought Bush was purposely interfering with her show. They commented they didn’t know what the reason was and in any case there was no way to prove anything.[11]
An article from Academics for Justice drew the same conclusion:
Today, Oprah Winfrey started a two-part series focusing on the impending U.S. war on Iraq. About halfway through the show the broadcast was pre-empted by coverage of Pres. George Bush, with Colin Powell at his side, reading a prepared statement on Iraq. The coincidental timing of this pre-emptive press statement raised immediate questions about the motives of the White House war strategists. Students of the Civil Rights Movement will recall an incident in 1964 when activist Fannie Lou Hamer sat before a live television audience and gave a riveting account of the oppression she and other Blacks faced in the South. President Lyndon Johnson was so convinced of the power of her appeal to undermine his own political/racial agenda, that he hastily called a press conference to pull cameras away from Hamer’s impassioned revelations…The pre-emption of Winfrey’s show today should be seen in the same light. Oprah’s audience is a vast and powerful—but largely apolitical—force of middle-class white women. It is likely that most did not watch Colin Powell’s live testimony at the U.N. yesterday. In fact, it is likely that this huge audience was being oriented to the issues of the Iraq war for the first time…The first 30 minutes of the show was decidedly anti-war and highlighted not only worldwide unanimity in opposition to the war but presented many of the heretofore unheard voices of ordinary people speaking forcefully against Bush’s motives.[12]
yeah. peepee doesn’t get how power works. the powerful must have a group behind him or with him. oprah’s group is her audience. people who watch oprah have no power so oprah has no power. her ngram peaked in 2008. saying oprah has power is like saying lebron james has power.
The difference is Lebron James is not a billionaire nor is he one of the 4 most worshipped people in America nor can he consistently make a book a best-seller or swing an election by 1 million votes nor shape the culture with the most watched talk show nor did he have hundreds of TV stations around America invested in his success.
At her peak, 16% of Americans told Gallup (without prompting) that they admired Oprah more than virtually any other woman in the World. Virtually no other entertainer has ever scored more than about 2% on the Gallup poll in the last 70 years & the number of people naming Lebron as their most admired man is too low to statistically measure <0.5%. Oprah's status is more comparable to a U.S. president than it is to a celeb and while her audience was not elites, they were suburban women (the most coveted major demographic for advertisers and politicians) and her influence over them was unparalleled.
This is how I look recently. Shaved beard and all.
Puppy would say you have a small head = small brain
LOL! For once Pill shows high social IQ. You read my mind precisely.
My head circumference is actually 23 inches smartasses. I am also only 6 ft 4 inches.
What is your HC for real? Post a photo with a tape measure around your head.
Hahahah. I am so sorry guys i meant to say 5 (FIVE!!!) feet four inches not 6 feet four inches. so sorry.
and also can do but will take a few days because im really low in conscientiousness. sorry for that as well.
Loaded’s head probably looks smaller in this picture because of the angle. Selfies also distort your proportions.
If Loaded actually has a 23 inch hc, maybe he has autism.
23″ is only a bit above average for a man.
I just expected loaded to have a really small head
Fuck you autists I just posted proof.
why does LOADED keep posting an “artist’s recreation” of a neanderthal as his picture?
because i can.
Just thinking what happens to the US if the replacement continues and the US becomes a majority non white country…I predict China will overtake it economically if that happens but the chinese standard of living will still be 1/20 of what a typical american has. But I could be wrong, central planning is capable of doing some really impressive things.
If the replacement continues there will be all-out civil war & whites will probably win because higher IQ. People can only afford to be liberal when they’re privileged (like me) but as white privilege continues to fade and even reverse, it will get ugly.
it will be an irregular war like the troubles, or no war at all…
it may happen that many states secede or parts of states and the federal govt does nothing…a lot of counties in eastern oregon voted to join idaho recently.
but i agree with peepee that white america will not allow america to be brazilified. if it comes to it, a small number of them will resort to “terrorism” and oklahoma city and 9/11 will be nothing in comparison.
the ideal is still possible as the US is a federal system in theory.
what’s bizarre about america is the most “liberal” parts are often the whitest and the most “conservative” whites often live in the south. and there’s been a major demographic phenomenon in the US where liberal whites move to white-er places like bend oregon. a contradiction. this trend will continue.
the ideal, non-violent, end is peaceful partition of the US along racial and political lines. so the libtard whites can live in cali, an the others can live in montana, synecdochally speaking and the federal government grants autonomy to thes states.
China in 50 years will basically look like Singapore. Its not a bad place to be I suppose. Its definitely the different take on modernity that academic leftists have been yearning for.
it will be a lot richer than it is today, but it can’t be like singapore. singapore is the world’s largest entrepot and small. lee kawn yoo himself said it would take china 100 years to catch up to the west. i think it won’t even be as rich as s korea or japan in 50 years, but it will eclipse the US as first superpower.
Recently China extended its 2 child policy to 3 children because they need middle class young people to pay middle class old people’s pensions (you can forget about taxing the powerful in China).
I have to note with some amusement that the east asians have not got with the programme and inundated their nations with 3rd world immigrants which indicates 2 things: (a) they are not under the rule or undue influence of a certain Middle Eastern nation (b) their elites seem to have ethnic bonds with their people even though by every social welfare metric they are crueller to their people economically and socially.
also their languages are much harder to learn and the US has a long history of immigration and europe is propinquitous to most of its lands whence its immigrants and ne asian countries have no history of colonialism. so it’s not quite apples to apples. some nigerian school boy won some math award in japan a few years ago.
AND the japanese are the world’s biggest racists. or so my dutch uncle told me. they identify 12 types of asians and japanese ar at the top naturally. recall the empire of japan was not nice.
Both China and the United States will deteriorate and collapse within the next century and a half guaranteed.
I don’t think will be an imperial power like western countries or a certain middle eastern nation is. I think it will invade Taiwan eventually but that doesn’t count (I agree that Taiwan is basically a rogue province if you look at chinese history).
the PRC vs ROC is a political difference noi an ethnic difference.
it would be interesting if there are examples from history of a once 80+% ethnic majority becoming a minority…what happened in those cases? za whites were always a minority? i’m not sure. as vorster said speaking to buckley, the afrikaners and bantus settled za at about the same time. “we settled a country bare, and the bantu came and settled certain portions for themselves.” — verwoerd
Neurotypical behavior is a good indicator of mental stability and health. Not man have that and this is my personal analysis from my neurotypical brain lol.
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/iq-bell-curve-midwit
Sums it up pretty well. Leftist Whites are smarter than bumpkins but dumber than the true gentile cognitive elite. These cucks are sharp enough to conform with pc culture for professional and social credibility but too dumb to do the math. Don’t be a pawn, PP! White people aren’t going to be extended the same compassion once they’re minorities in the West. This ‘equitable’ world we’re headed towards is going to be a commie shithole.
PP posts the worst comments. He/she is a fucking troll.
If it weren’t for my Oprah interest I’d be a God in the HBD-o-sphere. Something about Oprah is toxic to a straight white male audience & has been made me a bit of a pariah, even in my own comment section.
Ive also been a pariah in your comment section since the first day i posted. if you have a not-a-single-fuck given attitude im sure you can make the situation into a positive honestly.
Gotta say that I’ve adopted a healthy respect for Oprah in the same kind of anthropological sense, but I don’t worship her
“Something about Oprah is toxic to a straight white male audience”
At least to me gushing about Oprah seems like women’s magazine stuff, but it’s also a bit endearing for a hardcore HBD-er who talks about lower standing races to be an Oprah fanboy 🙂
in the US ENT is a type of doctor. ear nose and throat.
the ear and the throat have no racial stuff, but the nose does…
big time!
wypipo have yuge problems with dey noses.
the ideal is a wypipo nose with no problems.
second is a corrected wypipo nose.
third is a non-wypipo nose.
the ENT told me i had “nasal valve collapse”, that was my problem, not that the right turbinates hadn’t been reduced while the left had. but she was a woman.
the oderly was a thick china woman.
she called my name, “mugabe!?”
then she said…i swear…”wow!…my voice just cracked for a second,”
mugabe has experienced this yellow fever of a sort with a japanese at the hill, his taiwanese boss, what else?
(given that muagbe looks like the hollywood death camp commandant the inmates thank for killing them)…
thick, not fat, like ingrid.
there’s this small % of china women who are very physically attractive.
like that old jap woman who dances nude in The Chinese Connection.
so this physical attraction is real but one must stop even if allowed into the red chamber for two reasons:
1. race is correlated with other differences…other IMPORTANT differences.
2. one must ask himself if the homogenization of humans is better than the preservation of peoples.
it seems what happens is the two genders are not equally selected for their sexiness…unless they’re white.
By Frost’s logic, white women should be the most attractive because the ice age made women dependent on men & caused women to compete over men. This he claims is why white skin (and blue eyes, blond hair, red hair) evolved. But then why don’t Northeast Asians have light hair and blue eyes? Mug of Pee argues that whites experienced more cold than Northeast Asians but Rushton & Lynn beg to differ.