Earlier today President Trump said:
Oprah used to be a friend of mine…I was on her last show, her last week…I don’t think she thinks that way anymore…Once I ran for president, I didn’t noticed there weren’t too many calls coming from Oprah…Believe it or not, she used to like me.
President Trump has been repeatedly called out by CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale for falsely claiming to have been on the last episode of the highest rated talk show of all time, but Oprah did have him and his whole family on during her final season. The fact that Trump feels the need to embellish this honor shows the unparalleled status Oprah has in the culture. Despite being a billionaire, a U.S. President, and a TV star in his own right, Trump still feels the need to constantly brag about being on Oprah. It’s the ultimate validation.
Of course Trump couldn’t have been Oprah’s final guest, because in the end it was decided that only guest worthy of Oprah’s final show was Oprah herself, and so she spent that final hour in May 2011 standing alone on stage. When Oprah walked off the stage to thunderous applause from the studio audience, she was greeted backstage by all of her hundreds of employees (from lawyers to janitors) applauding her final walk down the hall of Harpo studios to the backdrop of a song Paul Simon composed exclusively for her:
Pumpkin Person 
pp is right. Oprah is pretty much synonymous with modern television.
Marketing professors should talk about Oprah the same way finance profs talk about AAPL. You could teach a unit on branding using nothing but Oprah examples.
I find Donald Trump deeply amusing.
Just forgetting that Oprah despite her sky high social and verbal IQ was not able to read Donald trump and only changed her mind about him along with the rest of democratic America.
If Donald is telling the truth
Not a question of being able to read him; she likely distanced herself because he became controversial.
He is controversial since his birth. Shestop to be amiccable with him when hestop to be convenient for her.
oprah exudes upper class…[redacted by pp, jan 7, 2021]
Indeed! She’s so poised and dignified. Thank you for saying that, Mug of Pee.
why were there professional photojournalists in the capitol along with the protestors?
Because your dick is small.
No go be stupid somewhere else.
Speaking of Mugabe’s stupidity, does anyone remember when he called me an idiot for investing in BNGO?
Looks like there’s ANOTHER thing Mugabe was wrong about. BNGO’s saphyr just beat Pacbio and is now the most accurate technology when it comes to mapping the genome.
This is revolutionary and BNGOs price has gone from .40 to 7 something In not even two weeks, and guess who had 6000 shares? ME
On top of all of this Tesla just broke 800…Sorry Mugabe, I could give you some Investing advice if you’re ready to make more than 10% a year on your portfolio?
Speaking of Mug of Pee’s financial predictions, just 3 days ago he wrote “musk will NOT be the world’s 2d richest person for long.” Amazingly that prediction came true yesterday, but perhaps not in the direction he had thought:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/elon-musk-jeff-bezos-1.5864594
[redacted by pp, jan 8, 2021]. the market is in a bubble because of [redacted by pp, jan 8, 2021] melo and peepee. musk won’t ve the richest man any longer than larry ellison was 20 years ago.
Taxi drivers told you what to buy. The shoeshine boy could give you a summary of the day’s financial news as he worked with rag and polish. An old beggar who regularly patrolled the street in front of my office now gave me tips and, I suppose, spent the money I and others gave him in the market. My cook had a brokerage account and followed the ticker closely. Her paper profits were quickly blown away in the gale of 1929. — joe kennedy
in fact short selling with put spreads is something the big short sellers like chanos can’t do much because options are much more illiquid than shares.
that is, as buffett has said, the piker actually has an advantage in that he can put on positions the whale can’t.
TSLA is just one of many companies in bubbles right now. buy “lottery tickets” on all of them and keep buying them. they’ll payoff. it’s just a question of when.
peepee will say: “mugabe is being inconsistent. what’s the difference between profiting on the way up vs on the way down?”
the answer is:
ceteris paribus there is no difference except that short sellers usually lose money. but all thing are NOT equal. TSLA et al are yuge bubbles and when a short seller makes his trade, the price goes down…the point is everyone who knows anything knows TSLA et al are bubbles…the people still buying are either stupid or evil.
TSLA is a bubble but I don’t think it will burst spectacularly. I think it will correct over a period in line with the reality of the amount of cars it sells. Musk should cash out now if hes only in it for the money but of course we all know he isn’t about just the money.
wrong!
TSLA will have to be a lot more than a car company. its price is up by literally 10x in one year for ZERO fundamental reasons, more like fundament-al reasons. sad.
TM is worth only 27% of TSLA but its revenues are about 10x TSLA’s. VW and TM are much bigger companies which can produce EVs cheaper and higher quality than TSLA. so…
1. even if TSLA grew to be as big as TM and VW it would be worth only 27% of its current price.
2. it will never grow so large, because even if it can stay in business its share of the EV market will go DOWN.
AND musk and people like him can’t cash in much because this must be reported and once he started selling the price would crash. like bill gates said, “i don’t actually have $100 billion. i just own a large part of MSFT.”
It would be interesting if Forbes estimated wealth based on how much you could liquidate in 1 month. The gap between Musk & Oprah would get a whole lot smaller
A technology greater than 5G is appearing. Satellites by Elon musk rockets will provide 16G to the whole planet. Sensors will be everywhere because of these 180-mile high satellites. People will walk around with VR headsets no cables 4K. No need to buy an expensive computer. It will all be in the cloud. This will create a 15 trillion dollar industry of satellite internet. Elon is investing in this. He may become the fist trillionaire.
I like Pumpkin always manipulates the truth by only being partially honest with the people. Now that’s upper-class!
My 23and me DNA report has been updated.
I want to do something like 23andMe too. But do you have any idea how to get polygenic scores for things like personality and IQ?
Also, LOADED, if you see this, feel free to chip in. I remember you posting something about this.
Dexter go to DNALand and upload your raw DNA data from an ancestry-testing website such as 23andMe or Ancestry or FTDNA (these are usually the sites that are accepted). You could also use an app like GenePlaza which also gives a polygenic score. Another website that works well is GenomeLink.
You wont receive a polygenic score from GenomeLink but you will get a corresponding percentage for how many SNPs place in a higher, moderate, and lower intelligence category. Also they have like 100+ other traits that are immensely interesting from digit ratio to openness scores etc. that give great insight into how other aspects of your personality may function.
110 Deal with it
115 Animekitty
120 Santo
125 Mugabe
130 Obama
135 Pumpkin Person
140 Trump
145 Opera
150 Elon Musk
155 Chris Langan
160 Stephen Wolfram
The last two are inaccurate because IQ cannot be recognized above 30 points of one’s own IQ. So the last two are much higher but are unable to be placed by me.
Anime has serious issues. That cannot be disregarded.
Autism?
Hmm I dont think so but honestly you obsess over things very strongly. You would benefit from not being fixated on your flaws, your interests, etc. I know its not necessarily a choice but cognitive behavioral therapy and trying to replace your current conceptual models with new ones will benefit you drastically.
You need to stop thinking about autism, your IQ, AI, etc. Its not good to fixate and narrow down your interests by being hung up on them. Branch out and find interests in other things that relate to your current interests and you will find your mind’s ability to expand extremely gratifying.
in other words: GET OFF THE INTERNET!!!!
Loaded, how can I get polygenic scores for IQ and personality. You did something like this right?
When will your obsession with oprah end PP?
LOADED what is your bitragion coronal arc length?
@Flamin i found an informative website defining and visually representing how to measure the term you mentioned. https://www.nap.edu/read/11815/chapter/4#31
There arent a lot of resources on it to say if i have a high BCA but im assuming its above average since it stood out to you. Whats your take on it or at least what speculations do you have from that picture alone?
It doesn’t have a whole lot of measurements listed but given that you have stated that your head circumference is 23 inches and you seem to have a low-broad head from the pictures, I guess your BCA is around 37 cm or 37.5 cm, so between 14.5 and 15 inches. The average is about 35 cm. SD is 1.39 cm, basically I hypothesize that it is considerably more removed from the mean than your head circumference is. But it is a hypothesis nonetheless.
Interesting. My BCA has probably increased since the time of that picture (I was 19 and now I am 25). I seem to have widened my face a bit especially around the ears/zygomatic area. My jaw has increased in width as well but maybe not as much.
I was told I have lamdoidal flattening as well in regards to my skull. Im more curious as to my cephalic index though as i have been characterized as high meso or low brachy. any thoughts or ideas on this topic would be very interesting. I await your analysis Flamin!
I was talking about your more recent pic from August.
Ah yes I do remember that where I inquired about my cephalic index. aside from the major difference in body fat could you spot any other differences between me in my profile pic and the one i took in august? craniometric wise especially.
did you know Thinking Mouse from an earlier period in PP’s blog history? He was a real interesting guy I think you two wouldve gotten along well seeing as though you have similar interests, styles of writing, and various other components of personality. I wouldnt be surprised if it turned out you were him but if not I would love to see a bromance between the two of you.
Aside from fat, I think that there is a difference in general maintenance and you look more tired as of the more recent picture.
I am not thinking mouse though I have come across a youtube channel by that name which also happened to have the same picture as the old commentator here.
Peepee, I’ve made several attempts to accurately and precisely measure my head circumference, but I can’t do it properly with the available equipment, i.e., a barely flexible tape measure. My readings have ranged roughly between 24.5″ to 26″.
What I know for certain is that a hat which I got a few years ago, possibly when my head was slightly smaller, is XXL and pretty snugly. Here’s the manufacturer’s sizing chart: https://www.baileyhats.com/media/catalog/product/b/a/bailey-size-chart_2_311.jpg
So we have a definite lower bound of 24.25″/62cm. If I ever travel to Canada to take the Wechsler, you can take a shot at estimating my cranial capacity. In the meanwhile, suggestions for better cranioanthropometry are appreciated.
I predict that your measurements will turn out to be similar to Charles amaral’s (the guy from the wind rose armory customs picture).
^ I predict that this guy is a renfair nerd
Flamin what would a high bitragion coronal arc length indicate? Cognitively speaking what would it correlate to? We know that head circumference is related to overall intelligence and moreover to performance intelligence. What would BCA relate to most?
Idk what renfairs even are, I just saw the pics when googling head circumference a while back. Basically the measurements were: max length = 22 5 cm. max width = 17 cm. auricle height = 15 cm. head circumference = 25.3 inches/64.3 cm or so.
@LOADED
Well I have suspected that a low-broad head might have some correlation with non-verbally orientated people but idk how strong such a correlation is if it exists. One way to have a disproportionate BAC wrt head circumference is a comparatively high width (wrt to length aka brachycephaly). On the other hand having a high BAC wrt to head width would be associated with more pointy headed acrocephalic people, something I associate with more verbal inclinations even if the correlation is only mild. So depending on *how* you end up with a high BAC and wrt to what other measurement.
*22.5 cm
Okay I shall measure mine soon and let you know Flamin. Thank you for your services thus far and I await to hear more about this subject in the future.
Posting this to spread the misery. This song has been stuck in my head all day. Objectively speaking though it’s very good. Although probably too unconventional for oprah fans.
Ganzir we’re all Renaissance Fair nerds here just dont take me to Scarborough Faire or nothing heard its a bunch of hippies trying to rip you off.
I wish renfaires had public executions and incestuous love triangles. Ya know, to make it more realistic. Like that Crusader Kings game
This game Crash Bandicoot 4 is so hard I can’t enjoy it. But I’m 66% of the way there so might as well try to see it out.
What happened to the rule about no off-topic comments?
It wasn’t practical
No shit. This the second time you’ve tried this.
Just moderate repetitive spammy shit and not all off topic shit in general
or you can just apply the rule to technical IQ articles
Hey pumpkin, can you link the study you have about South African monolinguals vs bilinguals and their verbal IQ differences?
Im reading the economist’s technology quarterly and they have a few articles on theoretical physics and this stuff is blowing my mind. Without doubt people like Einstein were geniuses to understand and make progress in these areas. I can barely understand these articles. It makes me recall how most of the world can’t progress due to not being able to produce Einsteins.
I’m actually not that surprised people like Philo are ignorant of the technological advances currently happening.
Newton and Einstein were a long time from each other. Be patient.
you’re both morons. as peter thiel has said repeatedly technical and medical and scientific progress has actually been SLOWING.
AND melo is a moron in thinking that innovators are the ones who get rich. the biggest technical advance in the last 10 years has been fracking and oil and gas companies have smaller market caps than they did 14 years ago and are much smaller relative to the biggest companies. year after year exxon was the world’s biggest company. now it’s not even close.
melo’s picture of the world is the same one i had when i was 5 years old.
the last innovator who got super rich is gordon moore.
“scientific progress has actually been SLOWING. “
False
According to one well-known analysis, science is increasing in quantity by about eight to nine percent a year, or in other words it is doubling in size about every nine years. This is an estimate of citations not only of scientific papers but also of books, datasets and websites. Furthermore, that rate of increase has itself been increasing over time. The researchers write: “We identified three growth phases in the development of science, which each led to growth rates tripling in comparison with the previous phase: from less than 1% up to the middle of the 18th century, to 2 to 3% up to the period between the two world wars and 8 to 9% to 2012.”25
“AND melo is a moron in thinking that innovators are the ones who get rich. “
I never said that at any point in this post you illiterate retard.
^ This is like arguing that the world’s average IQ is going up because the population is increasing
It’s literally nothing like that, but I get what you’re trying to say.
Most people have the misconception that because there are less groundbreaking innovations like the steam engine that means there is less innovation in total.
What metric do you suggest we use?
you said it in another post melo-tard.
stock market history is very clear. buying shares in one or more new technology companies is a mug’s game. for example, if you’d invested in all the computer technology companies in 1975 or something, you’d have underperformed the stock market as a whole by 2000…unless you’d also bought intel. this was an article in Forbes a long time ago. think of all the car companies that existed at the beginning of the horseless carriage. almost all of them eventually sucked ass.
Right, and I specifically said that I didn’t say it in this post. People’s views aren’t static.
Learn to read.
mugabe has changed his mind on btc though.
he’s all-in on btc futures calls.
why?
“all-in” meaning a full 5%. no one position should ever be more than 5%.
btc may go back to $3,000, but in the long run one cryptocurrency will kill all the rest.
it’s a natural monopoly. one global cryptocurrency.
that is, if btc becomes so much easier to use, accepted in so many more places, it doesn’t have to be the best conceivable cryptocurrency. theoretically better cryptocurrencies will never get off the ground. they’ll just be ignored.
and the current market cap of btc is $621b.
whereas the current physical US currency in circulation is $2t.
btc is like the “rabbit” in a mile+ race that goes on to win the race. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacemaker_(running)
“Investing” in bitcoin is such a fucking joke. It can’t even maintain a passable veneer of having even a tiny amount of intrinsic value, especially now that there are other, better cryptocurrencies like Monero, so all you’re doing is retardedly betting on how other people will retardedly bet.
can you read?
the race has been run and btc won. the superior cryptos are now irrelevant.
do you know what fiat money is? what’s the use value of a $100 dollar bill? you can wipe your ass with it.
the intrisic value is that people accept it as payment, the network, not the thing. gold has almost no use value except it’s pretty. silver and platinum do have use value.
try using loonies in the US.
they’re too much trouble for the person you’re paying. cab drivers don’t like it when canuckistanis say, “i’m sorry. all i have is loonies. can you please pretty please take my loonies? loonies are superior to USDs because canada’s small national debt…”
you see this with OSs.
computer nerds will say, “windows is a shitty OS. i like linux.”
but the software isn’t alawys easily portable across OSs so…
and theoretical physics has ZERO application as of today. no one’s material living standards have been improved by einstein or his contemporary epigones.
repeat after me:
the steam engine was invented before thermodyanimcs.
the steam engine was invented before thermodyanimcs.
the steam engine was invented before thermodyanimcs.
you are feeling very sleepy.
this applies to peepee’s comments on hbd in general:
in the last brian keating and eric weinstein podcast, keating said, “the nazis said theoretical physics as jewish and experimental physics was aryan. since then two nobels have been won by jewish experimentalists.” keating is himself a jewish experimentalist, despite the name. but his interjection was ignored. it shouldn’t’ve been. the science i know best is chemistry. there are four divisions of chemistry,
1. organic — super goyish…
2. inorganic — super duper goyish
3. analytic — goyish
4. physical — the theoreticians are jews. the experimentalists are much more goyish.
biochemistry is not the same as molecular biology, but it usually isn’t part of the chemistry department at american unis.
take nuclear power for example.
but nuclear bombs have actually brought peace via MAD.
this technology is attributed to einstein’s E = mc^2 by the mass media.
in reality no theorizing played any role. otto hahn discovered fission and fermi discovered the chain reaction. a gerry and a guido.
How can you be a white supremacist and not believe in HBD? Fuckin dumbfucks i swear.
But I have little to no interest in physical science. The science subject I picked for my high school final exams was biology because I could relate to it more and it seemed more interesting than chemistry or physics. I prefer to read about celeb gossip.
As you know my dad is a mildly retarded man who served as a private in the army for 35 years. My mother is a schizo who never even finished her primary schooling.
My dad’s an architect and my mom composes music for commercials, movies & TV shows.
So the same as Philo’s basically
LOL. I think it’s cool when parent-child vocations have some overlap in the cognitive domain tapped. My dentist friend’s parents are a pilot and a calculus teacher. All rather dependent on spatial aptitude. This assortative phenomenon is seen all the time when checking out the parentage of elite athletes also.
A bit off topic. I just discovered that Philippe Daumam, the former CEO of Viacom, had a perfect score on the old SAT at the age of 13. For a brief moment I was perplexed; I don’t think I’ve ever been as impressed by someone’s test scoring accomplishment as I was with Dauman. His life’s story is also pretty interesting; he is the son of a holocaust survivor, started as a freshman at Yale at 16. What would you reckon his iq to be? If you estimated Gates’ iq to be north of 160 ,surely this guy must be on par with Langan.
Watching the raptors game on a canadian channel. Literally every commercial couple has been gay or black dude/white woman. Sad!
Black guys shagging white chicks doesn’t bother me when I see it in real life. But seeing it in every ad just shows you the hostility these people have for the majority population.
PP’s mom works on TV commercials so he might know this.
Who is it who generally decides on races for each role? The mega corp? or the ad agency they contract the job to?
Does anyone know the answer to a problem showed below?
From the information already provided find the link between numbers in each row and fill in the missing numbers
3859 1114 __
4978 ____ 46
7579 ____ __
3859 1114 25
4978 1315 46
7579 1216 37
You just add pairs of digits from left to right
What subtest does that correspond to?
My maternal line can be traced back 6,500 years to southern Europe.
My paternal line can be traced 10,000 years to the upper-middle east.
0.7 percent of my DNA is middle eastern yet it goes back the furthest.
You’re wrong about theoretical physics having no practical application. In relation to light, its been manipulated to encode data in fibre optic cables using Einsteins work. Read the article in the economist. Basically most modern electronics is reliant on Einsteins discoveries with light.
no. that’s bullshit. why do you love jews so much pill?
Liking Jews is fine, but the slavish worship pill has for them is pathetic. Like many non-brilliant people, pill is instinctively conservative by which I mean he bows down & worships the over-class. By contrast I am liberal & root for the underdogs (dark skinned blacks, women, the overweight, those born in poverty). pill is too stupid & too socially stupid to understand.
“By contrast I am liberal & root for the underdogs (dark skinned blacks, women, the overweight, those born in poverty).”
Imagine thinking people are born destined to be overweight
a great example is the search by phsyicists and inorganic chemists for a romm temperature super conductor.
so many volumes of theory and in the end the highest temperature superconductor was found by random chance, using the Böhm-Bawerk/tinkerer-taleb-spitznagel/henry ford/evolutionary algorithm.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-temperature_superconductivity
no engineer in the US needs to take a course in physics post the maxwell equations. chemical engineers might be the only exception, but they don’t use qm.
“our modern world” is still very 19th c.
theoretical phsyics taking credit for so many modern technical accomplishments is exactly like historians taking credit for history.
einstein made no discoveries. he won his nobel for explaining the photoelectric effect. it’s like the claim that theoretical physics made nuclear power and the bomb. it didn’t.
and einstein’s own hero was the german gentile ernst mach of “mach 1, 2, 3, …” fame.
the two applications of modern theoretical physics i know of are:
1. rational drug design. qm/quantum chemistry.
almost all science is government funded. in the private sector drug companies are by far the biggest investors in straight-up science.
2. satellites. general relativity.
but also afaik so called “rational drug design” has had only one success, the HIV drugs.
and general relativity is way to spophisticated. what it provides would be easily “kludged” by engineers.
I was thinking of whose job I’d most like to do or be and right now I’m thinking it would be nice to be a Steve sailer. Maybe I should restart my blog again.
I know Steve Sailer.
Steve Sailer put me on his blogroll.
You sir, are no Steve Sailer.
Those who assert that colonialism had no effect on how we see reality must answer this question: why is that we see white aesthetics as objectively better when there’s no evolutionarily-based support for white features or skin coloring in favor of creating the objective standard of beauty? White aesthetics have contradictory support from evolutionary science and thus show us that colonialism must’ve impacted these peoples minds tremendously to broadly assert that whites have the best aesthetics and the objective standard of beauty.
Now one may argue that some of the beauty standards are indeed supported by evolutionary science. I would counter that point by saying that only white men or white women can achieve the standard rather than applying the standard to both genders would ultimately help the case yet this nearly never happens. This is due to the fact that most aesthetics come from a facet of attraction called “sexual dimorphism” and thus place the importance of looks on contrast between the genders.
Take for example the most obvious choice….skin color. If white skin color is objectively attractive it would only hold true for one gender. It will not carry over to the other gender because skin color’s attractiveness and aesthetic quality is based on sexual dimorphism. This is but one of many many instances where there is no evolutionary basis to assert that white men and women would be the objective standard for looks. And in turn shows us that colonialism has brought a culture and state of mind in all races of people that whites are the most beautiful race simply based on exposure.
This is indeed a huge burden for the white people to absolve themselves of. The tyranny of the white folk will not go unchecked certainly not by me.
I think Peter Frost has answered a lot of these questions on his blog…I went over there recently and was surprised to find out he still posts every once in a while.
AND STOP LYING!
the very idea of one hindu india and one muslim india (which became two) is post-raj. it’s totally new.
the british never ruled the raj like they ruled britain.
it was a patchwork quilt of principalities.
Hahahaha! Ian wtf my man hahahaha!
And nice reference Gman. Ive read the newer articles on his site but he is pretty technical at least for a biologist so I havent examined his findings on race and attractiveness in as much detail as Id like. But thank you regardless on the behalf of anyone else who wants to explore this topic. If and when I do Ill probably comment on the subject in the future here!
“objectively attractive”
Hahaha
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_and_union_territories_of_India_by_area
i looked this up and was surprised at my awesomeness.
the idea of hindustan as one country is retarded.
just like the idea of europe as one country is retarded.
but germans of the prussian sort are retarded.
so the british can only be blamed for allowing megalomanical congress party people to make one country out of a sow’s ear, so to speak.
i looked this up and was surprised at my awesomeness.
the idea of hindustan as one country is retarded.
just like the idea of europe as one country is retarded.
but germans of the prussian sort are retarded.
so the british can only be blamed for allowing megalomanical congress party people to make one country out of a sow’s ear, so to speak.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_and_union_territories_of_India_by_area
Did you read what I wrote RR? I implied that there is no such as thing as objective attractiveness. Also Mug Hindustan is a shithole with Indians being the lowest-tier people of all time.
https://theprint.in/world/indians-sexless-dont-know-how-they-reproduce-richard-nixon-in-new-declassified-tapes/495975/
I will leave this here since Richard Nixon talking about how Indian women are absolutely disgusting (absolutely true btw) is a great synthesis for answering both RR and Mug at one time.
Pumpkin can you make my last post its individual thread and not just a reply to an older thread? Thanks.
There’s no way for me to change where your comment was posted but I moderated it so you can post it again somewhere else.
What the….? Why was it moderated exactly? If there was no particular reason can you unmoderate it and post it wherever i put it? i put a shit ton of effort into conceptualizing and writing that and dont really want to go back and write it again id prefer if you just posted it.
I moderated it because you said you posted it in the wrong spot. When you post it in the right spot I can post it. No need for you to re-write; just copy and paste the moderated text (which only you & I can see when we’re logged in).
Nope I dont have the text saved anywhere. I wrote it from scratch. Theres no getting a hand on that again. I change my mind and think you should post it where I originally posted it.
done
I dont mean to bothersome but I meant my other comment on this specific post you made. If you could post the one from here thatd be worthwhile for me.
no idea what you’re talking about
The comment I posted about colonialism and its impact on the objectivity and subjectivity of aesthetics and appearances. If you cant find it its fine Ill try to write it from memory but please dont moderate it wherever it is. There was nothing vulgar in it and its absolutely as relevant as other comments published here.
For some reason wordpress sent it to my spam folder so I never saw but I found it now & approved it.
Wheres my comments?
Donald trump – the king of trolls.
Thats a compliment.
american presidents after G H W bush.
1. the first black president
2. the first retarded president
3. the second black president
4. an internet troll
5. a potato
norms of reaction vary over the lifespan.
for example:
1. sumo wrestlers generally die 10+ years earlier than the jap mean.
2. people over the age of 75 increase their ife expectancy if they start training for sumo…eating lots of protein and trying to build mass.
henry kissinger is 97 and is almost all the way there…he has almost become a sphere.
this is good for his health, but alex jones has also become a near perfect sphere and i expect will drop dead from a heart attack any day now.
see what i’m talking about.
this may be explained by the super heavyweight weightlifter phenomenon.
why do super heavyweight weightlifters tend to be fat?
the theory is that putting on muscle without putting on fat becomes more and more difficult.
so it may be the same with old people.
@illuminaticatblog: My IQ is definitely higher than 110. I mean, come on, I’m a top law school graduate. I guarantee it’s in the 130 + range at least.
depends on the IQ test.
i find supreme court justices very UN-impressive intellectually.
but in addition to VIQ…
there’s a factor which only the old GRE analytic section and the LSAT test…
call it “the faculty of reason and logic”.
all other IQ tests don’t test it.
Wechsler arithmetic probably tests it
Similarities on the WAIS perhaps?
no
Happy New Year to all the readers and Pumpkin! I hope y’all are doing well
I’m going to convert to Islam
I agree with Mugabe on TSLA. It’s being propped up by degenerate institutions like Goldman Sachs that keep buying calls worth millions in order to cause gamma squeezes. Retailers have just hopped on for the ridge. TSLA isn’t a stock; it’s a fairytale.
TSLA must be crushed for the market to return to sanity again. I will short TSLA one day. That day is coming soon!
@Ganzir and @Illuminaticatblog
What do you think my IQ is and do you have verbal vs non-verbal predictions as well?
For some context which may or may not help with the verbal vs non-verbal prediction: both the back and front of my brain are twisted and compressed.
Hmmm idk
Openpsychometric was accurate for me (both v1 and v3), however the subtests may be inaccurate.
86
There are better tests. It does say it only correlates about .5 with the ACT, which itself probably correlates only about .6-7 with FSIQ.
After 1.5 or 2 minutes I just clicked and rushed through it. I tend to not get things done unless I am being professionally monitored like an administered IQ test. I didn’t take ACT but I did take the SAT. The reading result was 570 and the math result was 770 with geometry > the math sections. I only completed that because I was being monitored.
*geometry > the other math sections