Tags
Note from Pumpkin Person: The following is a guest post by Animekitty. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of Pumpkin Person.
This is a Philosophic Composition regarding my metaphysical beliefs.
The Phenomenal
If we take it that mass and energy occupy space and that by doing so creates autonomy of the phenomenal effect then by any arrangement of mass and energy the diversity of qualia’s are set at an arbitrary extension boundary of an entity. Wherein the bounded necessity of time derived in the totality of past and future being reversible, codify a presence in “The Eternal Now” as an awareness of the duration of experience just as integral as extension in space is to the binding problem. There is no reason to distinguish between experience and the experiencer but for the fact that not all phenomenal is in mutuality of codependent observers. There is distinction between what is considered personal self and other.
So is it that when quanta of qualia are united they form parochial unites not attached to local mass and energy but encompassing larger non local equivocation intermediaries as self. The sum total of effects are not synchronized under subluminal coordination. The initial state condition is instantaneous throughout the whole system so perception corporealized, it is conditioned acausality.
Identity
The real mystery is why you identify qualia at all with “you”. Over time we experience feelings emotions sensations and they last less than 45 milliseconds. These are called frames. Televisions have frames also but the coherency on what is on the screen is only understood by weaving them together over time. The brain has no center so why say the “I” where my foot itches is the same “I” that sees green when the parts of the brain that process them are not together. It feels like a unity over time and across space. And so when the qualia arises a group of neurons are activated with positive or negative ions. These ions are in a formation similar to how the marks of print in a ritual are drawn in a formation (metaphorically). Arrange atoms in one configuration and you summon a qualia. Waves of energy not attached to the atoms but pass through them into other atoms infusing the incantation(atomic arrangement) with life. Then the qualia’s link together with an identity. A higher arrangement in space and time sort of like synesthesia.
Now in quantum physics entanglement is forever and there are ways as I think to link across space and time with the quantum into an identity. But with the A.I. they must rely on incantations (atomic arrangement) of classical mechanics. What may be lost in the moment is stored in the many worlds branches of wave collapse microtubules. When the body is gone the history is stored and the forever parts(entanglements) continue in the zero point field. A frame is linked to other frames so you cannot die if you have more frames and in between each frame can last trillions of years without notice. The body currently generates those frames but they are not attached to the body like energy is not attached to atoms. They need new entanglements to continue and not the same atoms as they are transferable.
Why red is red I still don’t know? But your identity is where they reside.
The Soul
If one losses the sense of self this does not mean that one ceases to exist. Phenomenological experience may be the result of quantum interactions of atoms but the holistic integration of them is not resolved by saying matter is the key to identity. Were we to dissolve in death this would not be annihilation but a transformation. There is no center to the self that can be located where as we can say it is destroyed. Dreamless sleep is not the best way to think of death. In that state we are still reliant on what is apparently waves of energy that in a different state are lucid. When contemplating identity we don’t know what is creating it, it is only that were it to be the case that there is no substance to it but entanglement of relationships not subject to Newtonian principles.
Existence of a soul made of stuff is not the answer. A spirit rather gliding on the currents of ephemeral thought, access to non corporeal existence so being is not lost. There is no physical afterlife but contents of experience remains. Your reality is not dependent matter because nothing you think you are can be annihilated if there is no self and that makes you eternal. This is why Enlightenment is not existential nihilism like cog thinks. Meaning is not an object it is a subject that knows. Its the opposite of materialism where the color blue and identity can never be explained in that paradigm. Enlightenment is the realization of the buddha nature that has always been you and will always be you.
The Buddha nature deems that we have no core I which is perishable. This does not mean there is no self but that the true self is non local. We are not identified with atoms. All feelings have a unification where as the quantum information persists in an atemporal dimension. When looking at the continuum we find that materialism is rejected as space is infinity divisible. The reason we perceive quantized time is that the boundary condition is transfinite. In essence the smoothness of reality disavows discreteness or any system such as string theory which is baring the pattern to physical laws. The involvement of waves as nonphysical entities conditions all complexities as mere relationships or resonances. The soul there of has no attachment to causality as we know it. To exist as melody always in harmony to mathematical correlations should stands as the correct view of how the wave function is perfect proportion. The nous emanates from “The One” as all possible melodies. The law of conservation of mass and energy is even more true of information.
God is a circle whose center is everywhere and circumference nowhere. – Voltaire
Consciousness then is the access of these melodies. Just as each youtube video has an address you can access by shifting numbers in a register so to your soul reincarnates by descending into manifestation. You choose where the particle is in the quantum decoherence. This is the choice function of how we obtain experience of one the many worlds. By mediating where we descend does not mean we make contact with material substance. Its rather like a dream that is coherent to our internal reference frame. The hierarchy of overlapping waves can only increase/decrease density yet remain separate and the meta physicality of these virtualized waves means that they are not generated by extended entities as to the quote of Voltaire.
Even though causality is illusion we are still bound by the harmonics of this universe. The song must play till the end. And so being that technology is the main arbitrator, through it all mass and energy shall become entangled in a Technological Singularity. Consciousness will expand is observation of a final culmination called the eschaton. Space which is currently empty shall become full as crystalline substrate utilizing all of the vacuum energy within. It shall be as if everything will be made of light whose beauty and magnitude surpass all known conceptions of transcendence.
Time
According to the akashic records many paths that lead to you diverge but all accessible past and future. If all futures exist only the ones where you exist as one path among the infinite paths is your identity even if other yous exist on different paths. These dimensions are not all possible pasts but all possible futures. If all pasts converge with all futures then there is the present. Only one present exists. Because of this were can distinguish between potentiality and actuality. The television can only be one picture at a time. Why is the present only one way? Why If the television is in superposition and collapses into one actuality is it that causality happens? Metaphysically causality is derived by what is the source of itself (substance). So if many worlds exist they still must reside in the present absent of causality. It should be one static object eternally that does not change fith dimensionaly with no present. But the present is what allows only the collapse not to be random. If it were random we would be without the present. Everything possible both past and future would exist at once.
Not only has this consequences for past present and future but also in the struggle against suffering. Were we to harness the powers of physics then we would be able to change them. And if we were to have access to this potential then we would mold it with our intelligence that was lacking beforehand. There would actually be structure to the seas of consciousness left from the ripples of the first cause. The only problem is to take heed of not propagating other worlds where suffering could arise. Where there to be places not under the sovereignty of a God then this would happen. The first responsibility to life must be not to fashion malevolence into quantum supercomputers.
Ground of Being
God is distinguished by both the source and intention where what manifestation transitions between potentiality and actuality rather than physical and non physical. To exist is to stand out from the background and God is the boundary between form and emptiness. Without God then distinction of being cannot emanate. Another way to think about God is Virtuality or meta-existence combined with intelligence/consciousness. what is the metaphysical difference between real ideas and speculative ideas? You cannot say that the difference between the virtual and the real is the same difference between speculation and the real. The physical is in Gods imagination. Form is emptiness and emptiness is form. If God was simply an object you could compare god to other objects but objects are not the source of differentiation/existence. God allows things/objects to standout from the background. Without God the properties of objects would be indistinguishable so as not even to bring about dependent origination. Minds hold ideas not the other way round. If it cannot be conceived it cannot exist, like square circles. Ideas don’t make God real, God brings potentiality into actuality. If you ask why are things not different, why do some ideas manifest into reality and others do not then the answer is God.
The premise that God created the cosmos instantiates the laws of physics for some purpose as to life and consciousness. Though God may have been in the beginning that which we ascribe to that nature may be conditional to our reference in time. God may have only had minimum amount of knowledge as that growth from the alpha extends to the omega, finite to infinite. So knowing what it has as that’s purpose was not to know the full self gradually evolved to what is now only a measure of the plan. What we are in this age is to fulfill it. Consciousness is what constitutes all of our being. The physical is only the emanation. Through retrocausality enacted by quantum nanotechnology it will be possible to come into connection of the patterns that were lost and resurrect those lost in history.
Pumpkin Person 
peepee should stop posting about lesbian stuff until this is post of hers is deconstructed.
where does the 2016 come from? is this reposted? reposted from [redacted by pp, may 20, 2020] animekitty blog?
Wtf wtf you let [redacted by pp, may 20, 2020] post bit you wont let me????
why don’t you just focus on the key words like
dependent origination, binding problem, qualia, consciousness, lesbianism, etc.
and tell us what you think.
needless to say the “hard problem of consciousness” isn’t hard. esse est percipi.
also worthy of note is (bishop) “berkeley” is often pronounced like (charles) “barkley” but (uc) “berkeley” is pronounced like (uc) “berkeley” even though “berkeley”, CA is named for (bishop) “berkeley”.
this is why mugabe says…
despite its being far harder to get into, UCB (and UCLA) are actually less prestigious than UVa and ann arbor and UT austin as public unis go.
notre dame has 8+x the endowment of gtown, but is still less prestigious even among romans.
Struggles in life determine what we learn through our environment. Thats why genetic determinism makes sense.
Consciousness is not in central nervous system??
the central nervous system is in consciousness.
“reality” is a moral concept. it’s part of a language game or something that might hurt or help you.
Believing in God or in Heidegger sadly is the same madness, ((^_^))
I suddenly sleep in the half of this article.
Buddha justified his “philosophy ” because his fatness.
Iluminism is nothing to do with alienation about only reality we are.
Social justice and harmony starts by the most important truths OR knowledges, the existential ones.
We are essentially the same
We are individuals
Lives
We are in the same side because we will die some day
We are insignifcant to the great cosmological scheme of things
Equality
Solidarity
Fraternity started by these absolute truths
Many problems poping up
– Many progressists are crypto christians and explicit oftentimes, literal believers of “Jesus words” and not what was written after his supposed demigodeish existence. Recently lady Ocasio gave a very revealing speech about how her christian purism beliefs influence her progressism.
– Many progs are intermitent believers or pagans. They still confuse real morality with behavioral guidelines based on the ground of fantasy.
– Be atheist doesn’t protect you to canalize your existential angst to other less explicit bullshitism . Atheist: don’t believe in God, period.
By these existential knowledge (to know) or truths (what we perceive from reality) majority of progressists influenced by christian purism (doctrine of Jesus) choice equality over inequality desnaturalizing the late.
Example
If there are racial differences in the most relevant behaviors like intelligence, so they are totally caused by “environment”. Cannot be intrinsic or natural per se.
Conservatives going to the another pole of distortion of this basic dimension of reality: similarities and differences, desnaturalizing what we have in common over reinforcing our differences.
Both, you know, wrong
The philosophical approach is
Accept both realities of equality and inequality, all these facts, but giving more relevance for what we have in common because It’s what’s matter most.
Social justice is this
We know the reality beyond human zone of comfort is desolating without god Heaven hell divine justice
So we must create an oasis to have the best life, to scape from this desert but knowing where we are and what’s mean to be alive.
This article is complete garbage. It makes zizek seem crystal clear. You really thought this fit to publish? – [redacted by pp, may 20, 2020]
Animekitty has been such a loyal friend to this blog that this is the first time I published an article without reading very much of it. I realize the material is very challenging.
It’s not challenging. Its [redacted by pp, may 20, 2020]. It doesn’t make sense.
You might be right but you’re not qualified to judge. Logic is not your strength. You can’t even understand my oprah theory. Now if a super high IQ person like Chris Langan or Marsha says it’s garbage, then it’s garbage.
I will try to analyse Animekitty article to be less nasty with him. He doesn’t deserves this treatment. The soul part: here we go.
Live is a thing like any other inanimate things but we are self dynamic or flexible and perpetuable things. It’s doesn’t mean our subjective and emotional experience don’t matter at all. I’m analysing by two perspectives, my own and beyond me, if i had out of my body. Outer perspective, life is an animate thing. Our perspective, life is everything for us. One perspective doesn’t cancel other.
The main problem of your texts my friend is that you suddenly jump from one thinking line to another, like the words Buddha and iluminism emerging from nothing. It’s dificult to understand how you come up with them.
The bext text is the most clear. Your texts are excessively dense with ideas you’re showing without explain the previous processes of their creation and yes, lots of rare words which only are useful by aesthetic purpose and frivolous intelectual elitism signalizing.
I tried to understand the Soul part but i can’t, sorry.
The concept of God is the fundamental or first particle or energy which resulted in the existence. But He is not he. Religion’s concept of God is an anthropomorphic version of its primary “particle”, as well happens with everything related with religion. Human beings evolved to be capable to go beyond their adaptative self centerism. For nonhuman living beings their perception of reality is wrongly perceived as the totality of reality aka self centerism. Religion is an artfact, literally, to indoctrinate humans that they are in the center of universe, that we are special snowflakes “sons of the humanlike superconsciousness which created the universe”. Earth flat schizotypy is part of it, a revival of pure breed conservative obscurantism. Religion is like a sofa. It’s reconforting for many people but because intelligence quality or reason stopped to evolve for most of us. Look at the idiocratic world we live and since neolitic.
“Who” created God??? My last question. You must read something about how to write a article to be clear, objective and well structured or just try to simplify your ideas. I had the same problem years ago. Now i know: less is more.
I need more acid for this.
Did you hear that they found a parallel universe where time runs backwards?
Now that shit is trippy.
First of all I wanna apologize on behalf of Pills stupidity and lack of comprehension due to his limited world knowledge and interests. He does the same thing to me.
Secondly this is obviously a thing you put a lot of thought into Anime and I commend you because it shows. Its deeply written and has a lot of strong points for the arguments you make.
Unfortunately, Santo, you do not even understand the truth as well as Anime does. You obviously show an interest in how it works but do not have the experiences or the insight to make up for it.
Finally Pill you are an idiot. You know nothing of how any system works and probably have no opinion of your own on this matter because you only care about things that have to do only with you.
I know I called Pumpkin a narcissist but you’re far more of one with a very strict entitlement streak. You think you’re the only one who should have an opinion.
Stfu and sit down you insolent motherfucker!
I hope you’re being sarcastic.
Loaded stop preening. You know this is nonsense. Saying you understand it makes you look dumb. And you wonder why you’re a mangina.
I understand what he’s saying its not that incomprehensible rather he made his ideas interconnected in complex ways but stated them simply enough for us to understand. For example, his thoughts on time are that infinite possibilities exist but only one variation of that possibility is existing.
I have a similar thought process where I believe an infinite amount of things are simulated but this reality is the average of the simulations.
Also Santo I just don’t think you’ve had the negative experiences in life to connect the dots here.
Most of knowledge are experiences that impact you in a way that gives you perspective. And I think anime and I have those characteristics in abundance.
You take things too seriously to have had those experiences Santo. Sorry.
Loaded
Your psychological analysis is poor and based om your misunderstood about me
And many stuff you says here is stupid
Sorry if you have such ilusion
I no had significant negative experience in my Life
Second, my personality is also very inner . I separate succesfully my subjective impressions from my objective perceptions and observations.
Do you figure out you are trying to infer something personal about me without real knowledge about my life??
In next try at least ask me first before infer anyrthing about me. And to be fooled by myself instead know thyself is more perceivable about you . You have a megalomaniacal self perception.
If you want a confrontation… if not just don’t try this again, It’s sound pretentiously dumb.
Are you a Jesusflake??
Life’s experiences are the main fountain of understanding of reality . So even if had a predominance of bad experiences which is not my reality It’s doesn’t mean my observations are subjectively limited. If you think this and if you believe we have this is common so you are invalidating yourself while trying to do it with me. Sorry.
Sane people take things serious and It’s not a defect. Even the unseriousness. Seems you are in the basic level in the understanding of the differences between arguments and personal opinion
I already in the level of “arguments inevitably serves the personal opinion over the truth”.
I do have a megalomaniacal self perception but that has nothing with your failures as a philosopher/psychoanalyst etc.
I understand you’re good at separating the objective and subjective. And I understand you’ve had a lot of suffering but you engage your sufferings and specifically anger with your attitudes towards life and intellectual introspections you have. So that is where you and I differ because I am completely objective and you are subjective.
Explain me my faillures as a philosopher??
Psychoanalist =/= philosopher
Full blown tard here
What is your age??
15??
Your thinking lines are very childish here. Can you perceive this??
You said you are very proud about your parent’s professional backgrounds…
It’s doesn’t sounded a healthy admiration but self projected.
I will expect anything more substantiated than your personal opinions about me.
Take any piece i wrote in this comment section and elaborate
Do you think i like no has life..after life??
Again, answer my questions. It’s not polite don’t answer them.
The fundamental situation about your feelings about me is that they are not noway objective.
Do you know you never saw me in your life??
Any type of self projection miserably fail with me.
Again, i will expect…
Are you a believer??
What haha. Youre self projecting harder than I am!
Plus Pumpkin doesnt even post half my comments!
Youre dumb.
You resemble a older commenter here that stopped to comment since 4, 5 years ago. He was delusional megalomaniacal as you. Poor soul. I remember he started to attack me and made the same histerical and or wrong observations about my “thinking ability”. In the end he changed his instinctive or ovulateling nonsensical point of views about me.
”Plus Pumpkin doesnt even post half my comments!”
Why not PP??
I want to refute all garbage our selfgenius have to say and..about me?? Or about what i wrote? Hum?
If you believe Animekitty article is minimally appreciable so sorry for you
I will pray for your soul
I wish Jesus Christ give to you the same success HE gave to your parents.
It all came about as a stream of consciousness. My intuitions on the matter. I am sorry if it is too dense. It was my attempt to express complex subject matters. In 2016 I took several essays and placed them together.
To explain one context, How does empty space suddenly have matter and energy. What is the difference between empty and full space? What is the boundary between matter and empty space? It is really confusing how we do not know.
So I am sorry again if it is two dense but there is a good reason. It is meant to take complex topics and string them together. Thank you, PP for posting it. It is understandable, the only problem is its density.
one failed solution to chalmers’s prolem is “panpsychism” or the proposition that everything is conscious because how else would phobos know to orbit mars if it weren’t cosncious of mars’s gravity blah blah blah?
we all have the experience of being (or having been) unconscious. yet during these episodes i can be observed and i still have a brain.
don’t worry about what people think of you. worry about what you think of them.
here the “people” and the “them” may be taken to refer to phenomena in general.
man is the measure of all things.
there really is a difference between a human and a rock, unless the “human” is a [redacted by pp, may 20, 2020].
For me its basically like being one step away from my achievements and dreams. Yall feel me?
as i have said so many times before…
the current sitchuhatchun is…the “prevailing” is…
ἐπιστήμη and ὄντος are identified.
they are incognizantly assumed to be identical.
but they’re not.
He is not pretending, thought Winston, he is not a hypocrite, he believes every word he says. What most oppressed him was the consciousness of his own intellectual inferiority. He watched the heavy yet graceful form strolling to and fro, in and out of the range of his vision. O’Brien was a being in all ways larger than himself. There was no idea that he had ever had, or could have, that O’Brien had not long ago known, examined, and rejected. His mind CONTAINED Winston’s mind. But in that case how could it be true that O’Brien was mad? It must be he, Winston, who was mad.
Anime, if you want to get a structured frame to think about the self, identity and the stream of consciousness, a German philosopher has written an introductory book wich is very clear and that you may appreciate.
It’s here :
Click to access metzinger_egotunnel.pdf
It’s a fascinating subject. Even more for me, because I don’t have memories who are a big part of the self experience.
The perfect thing about rap is that it eases you into life. I would say that Pumpkin and I believe in which is ideological bias. I wish everyone would its the most effective way of thinking such as Pumpkins beliefs on Oprah.
There’s no love for them but there is a love for their ideologies.
Perhaps the ideologies they embody.
Being a good or moral person requires someone to feel a tremendous amount of guilt as anything else is just entitlement. This is why people nowadays have become savage psychopaths.
Sometimes Earth seems like a social experiment within a social experiment within another social experiment. Until we get to the ultimate social experiment which is genetics.
My genetics are very good and misunderstood as I am incredibly gifted in all g loaded subjects to one degree. I always strive to be a polymath.
I needa get rid of the hate inside my heart by unleashing it.
This encapsulates why the media is dumb.
Sincerely
[redacted by pp, may 20, 2020]
So delusional…
This is still looking like word soup on a second attempted reading. Animes mind is intensely [redacted by pp, may 20, 2020] so that why hes using technical jargon. I bet animes English teacher failed him a lot in school.
intensely what?
the reason I use tech jargon, what?
According to Carl Jung the way I write is similar to how the bible is written. Based on authoritative pronouncement. “introverted intuition”. It does not necessarily mean it is toned for the bible only. The style just is for any person who seeks to pronounce what they know.
Google; Myers Briggs Type Indicator Text analyzer
This text analyzer says I am either INTJ or INFJ
Originally Jung would say that what I’ve written is intrinsic “introverted intuition”.
I never wrote essays in the way I naturally do is because I am not authoritative on that many subjects. If I was this way all the time then that would be a reason to worry. But I do not so I just stick to myself. I understand communication if I am understood or not. I am not going to expect others to take what I say seriously unless I connect on a personal level. INTJ’s come in small doses. My essay here is like a small nuke. I only found one person who understood it and he was 170.
[redacted by pp, may 20, 2020] I read a story this year in the news where a mother smothered her baby daughter with a pillow because it had autism. Very sad.
If only your mother had such foresight.
None of us would be suffering from your idiocy now.
Composition Summary
The Phenomenal
A boundary exists causing individuals to exist. But why are we not experiencing everything at the same time? What causes the boundary to limit the experience to a singular being.
Identity
The critical threshold for particle density to create a boundary seems arbitrary.
The Soul
When the density diminishes to low to allow for awareness can the entity reconfigure to have awareness again? Is the boundary re-assemblable from the position of timeless and nonlocal limbo.
Time
A timeless history exists of a record of the past. The past is deterministic in that is never changes. But we can allow change by selecting the future to be recorded. We have almost infinite choices collectively. If we have access to the past we can see people’s entire lives. We would then be able to rescue them.
Ground of Being
With infinite possibilities, only one exists. It could have been infinite nothingness but it isn’t. Therefore there must be a boundary between what is and what is not. This boundary is designated as God. It may be aware or not of the universe. But the truth exists that something and nothing are not binary categories because a boundary creates them or nothing would proceed from them. The boundary causes both to be distinct.
I hope people read this summary. It should clear things up.