Many fans of the Halloween franchise would love to forget Rob Zombie’s 2007 remake (and its 2009 sequel) because it gave the mysterious slasher Michael Myers a backstory and turned him into white trash. However I see Zombie’s versions as an interesting alternative and there’s something very creepy about a white trash family so consumed with their own dysfunction that a budding serial killer just gets lost in the chaos. And from an HBD perspective, it’s only logical that someone as messed up as Michael Myers would be born in a low class home: the genetic garbage of society.
In the above scence, William Forsythe does a great job as Ronnie White, the boyfriend of Michael Myer’s mother. It’s hilarious watching him mock the crying baby and the way young Michael says good morning to it.
While Myers’s mother is in denial, Ronnie has the social intelligence to realize young Michael is one messed up kid who will grow up to be some kind of freak, though not even he can see imagine the brutal monster Michael would one day become.
Mostly he just makes fun of young Michael for seeming gay.
If young Michael had been administered the WISC-R intelligence test, I think he would have scored around 80. Obviously an IQ test can’t tell you a kid will grow up to be a serial killer, but it can roughly predict whether you will rise or fall in social class.
Since Michael had a low IQ in my opinion, even compared to other children of “white trash”, one would have predicted that he would fall even further in social class, which is exactly what happens. Michael’s violent rage leads him to a life of mental hospitalization and in Zombie’s vastly underrated sequel, homelessness. And low scores on certain Wechsler subtests, especially one involving verbal abstraction, might reveal young Michael’s detachment from reality. Indeed Wechsler saw his scale as a psychiatric tool, in addition to an IQ test.
Pumpkin Person 
Rob zombie’s Halloween is great because of how extreme it was in displaying the disgusting side of humanity in it’s characters. The deaths were so gruesome and my favorite aspect was Michael’s obvious lack of empathy.
Have you watched River’s edge? Its a delves a little into the psychology of serial killers without exposition dumps. The movie is highly underrated. Crispin Glover, Keanu Reeves, and dennis hopper are great in it.
No i haven’t seen it but i looked it up & the plot sounds interesting. I’ll have to look for it on Netflix
I don’t think it’s on Netflix, I believe I watched it first on tubi tv or something. I highly recommend it, it’s not perfect but it does make you ponder human morality and our future generation in the context of their particular intentionality and ethics
”it’s only logical that someone as messed up as Michael Myers would be born in a low class home: the genetic garbage of society.”
Why you don’t censor yourself Puppy*
[inappropriate words]
So wrong, offensive and insidious
Puppy,
your elite is not a genetic garbage of society* I mean, a bunch of useless parasites*
What happened with Robert Lindsay blog*
Don’t know, but it’s not good
I hope he doesn’t commit suicide or fall into deep depression. He looks fragile. It’s sad because he is an interesting person and a gifted writer.
bruno, what do you think about the kind of stuff he writes about indians?
I wish him well too. I actually feel pity for him. Bad people need good guidance.
I don’t know any indian so I can’t tell. Maybe he was influenced by his hatred of a class society wich must be the worst for a socialist.
I ve noticed that Dravidian Brahmin, in particular from Madras (Chenai) were even more clever than Jews. There a smaller minority (1%) than Brahmin in the north (5%). One of the most intelligent mathematician was from there. Many leftist indian in the USA are from there too (like Kamala’s mother).
I hope it’s a bad for a good. Not having the pocket money from the site help him find a job. He could be a librarian or something like this.
But I am not very optimist Maybe Pumpkin will try to help and advise him as a pen-pal and par-blogger.
His narrative is or was histerical and or very impolite with: indians, jews, homossexuals, liberals, etc…
You don’t need to know ”any” indian to know who ”s/he tend to be” because there are 1 billion of them in the world, thanks demographic explosion. If indians were the worst people in the world …
For French people, all English are the same devious people. For them we are all arrogant. But there enough diversity of characters to give interesting littérature and societies.
I suppose generalisations about groups are to be understood like describing a different curve for a specific trait. Not more.
It’s true that he tended to be very not PC. But that was interesting. For example, I would have never guessed gays had on average 150 encounters and many 10k in their life, and that their life expectancy was 15 years less than normal, and that very had sexual practices were very common … it should be discussed more in main publications to know if that’s true.
I really don’t care what a typical avg joey think, usually a gross generalisation.
He is or was absolutely impolite… he deserved to be censored because he was creating enemies and not allies, a significant mark of low social intelligence.
10 thousand*****
Into account suicide, another forms of precocious unnatural deaths and STD, homossexual life expectancy might be higher than that. Analogous to autism life expectancy.
”it should be discussed more in main publications to know if that’s true.”
debated educately and not by mental ill people as Robert.
It’s true, maybe less that ”10k during all life”, i doubt this is the total number of sex with different people for homossexual/for us.
If you read all Robert posts and don’t think there is something quite wrong in the way he put the words, so… you have normalized in your perception an excessive or dispensable brutalization of reality.
” you have normalized in your perception an excessive or dispensable brutalization of reality.”
Where? he seems to attempt to be as inpartial as possible, outside of economics lol. What do you think he says thats exagurated?
Wait thats the picture of a low class home? In india high class homes look like that more or less. But we dont put stickers on fridges XD
i’ll start a blog for pill and swank and jimmy if you promote it.
okay.
That would be a crazy and fascinating mix. [redacted by pp, nov 7, 2018]
Yo wassup with the redaction?
I try to redact negative comments about people who are no longer here to defend themselves
Wait, mugabe is prone to do jokes. So maybe this is another one!
bad ones.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David_Becker11/publication/316973000_National_IQs_revisited_The_first_steps_of_a_long-term_project/links/591b02794585156952828a67/National-IQs-revisited-The-first-steps-of-a-long-term-project.pdf?origin=publication_detail
What are your thoughts on this? I think Hong Kong, Botswana, Morocco and Jordan show interesting results.
Indians IQ 70?
There are so many samples in third world of different results depending on the environment and sample selectionthat you always can cherry pick with. But its not impossible as a lot of indians dont have qality education, polltion to face and poverty.
http://raceandiqmyths.blogspot.com/2016/12/average-iq-of-india-and-iq-map-of-india.html?m=1
http://raceandiqmyths.blogspot.com/2016/10/lynns-contrived-work-on-iq-of-india.html?m=0
True, but 70 is too less. According to IQ charts, person with a 79 to 70 score is borderline mental disability. The poorest in many countries not just in india, are not borderline mentally disabled.
Santo,
Why is brazil so corrupt when its elite is white? Is it that medditerareans dont stack up to nordics? the CPI (Corruption perception index) seems to state that non hajnal line descendants are all corrupt, though i im sure if the index is to be trusted as its the perception of academic jews and rich whites, but their perspective is relevant to an degree as not all actors are rational, with reputation being important in many instances.
I would guess rich americans have something to do with it, i mean the favelas are excesively violent thanks to the drug war for example. But is there anything outside of americans and chinese bullying brazil that makes it so infamous?
Edit
Though im not sure.
that you think makes it so infamous?
I don’t think the fair skinned Brazilians are Nordic. They may be of Spanish or Portuguese blood. But they also have native American blood.
Nordics I don’t think are that advanced. They didn’t have as much urban development or other stuff until1000 A.D stuff even when the rest of the world had them.
I think Brazil’s drug problem is because it is too large Other South American countries see it as a big market. Plus it being Portuguese speaking instead of Spanish like other countries they may see it as a cousin country rather than as a sibling country. So drug dealers would relatively feel less concerned to sell drugs in Brazil than to other Spanish speaking countries.
And the corruption is more or less the same as compared to other countries with same development index. As countries become more advanced corruption falls.
”I don’t think the fair skinned Brazilians are Nordic. They may be of Spanish or Portuguese blood. But they also have native American blood.”
Southern Brazil have huge % of brazilians who are german and nothern-italian descendents as well São Paulo state, which received most of italian immigrants. Minas Gerais, Rio and Espírito Santo also have huge % of pop with non-portuguese european descent. Bolsonaro is son of italian immigrants, probably from Veneto.
“I don’t think the fair skinned Brazilians are Nordic.”
Never claimed they were.
“Nordics I don’t think are that advanced. They didn’t have as much urban development or other stuff until1000 A.D stuff even when the rest of the world had them.”
They were pretty sophisticated, they jsut didnt have enought agriculture but that fixed itself with the introduction of new crops.
“So drug dealers would relatively feel less concerned to sell drugs in Brazil than to other Spanish speaking countries.”
The drug dealers have many clever participants, they could sell drugs almost everywhere.
“And the corruption is more or less the same as compared to other countries with same development index. As countries become more advanced corruption falls.”
It seems to be that way with current data. But was northern europe as bad in the past when their poverty was comparable? i think the resource trap and foreign actors create an extra layer of corruption that wasnt prevalent in past “modern” nations.
”Santo,
Why is brazil so corrupt when its elite is white?”
huahuahuahuahuahuahuahuahuahua, whites are always angels**
”Is it that medditerareans dont stack up to nordics?”
Ultra-progressive swedish elites are not [on avg] corrupted too*
”the CPI (Corruption perception index) seems to state that non hajnal line descendants are all corrupt, though i im sure if the index is to be trusted as its the perception of academic jews and rich whites, but their perspective is relevant to an degree as not all actors are rational, with reputation being important in many instances.”
Stop to read HBD regurgitations and learn history. Yes, it’s seems northern europeans tend to be less corruptible when they are compared with another pops, but it’s more relative than absolute. Absolutely speaking, nordics are not considerably less corruptible SPECIALLY those who seek the power.
”I would guess rich americans have something to do with it, i mean the favelas are excesively violent thanks to the drug war for example. But is there anything outside of americans and chinese bullying brazil that makes it so infamous?”
Brazilian people on avg are very dumb and politically inactive. When population don’t care about their own rights or can’t understand what is written in their own national constitution and also when they no have a systematic organization they become easily manipulable.
Power Rangers = people without being an organized power
Megazords = you know.
Favelas are the result of demographic explosion thanks for right wing dictatorship which encouraged brazilian population to procreate and increase their numbers + general western medicine improvement in that time + rural exhodus [another thing righ wing dictatorship helped to increase], subsequent urbanization without organization and social equalization, also the fact huge fractions of brazilian pop are not adapted to live in urban environemnts and to work on cognitively demanding professions and considerable nonexistence of state on marginalized areas causing the emergence of organized crime or parallel state in combination of popularization of drug addictions, as well significant economic stagnation after dictatorship caused by indebtedness of the brazilian state.
In future I’m not going to post comments that only show videos with no comment putting them in context, otherwise the comment section will just get spammed with videos.
Ok.
Open-thread
RR,
Why does piffers polygenic scores show asians on top when the alleles are derived from european populations`?
https://eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2018-10/vu-las103018.php
RR,
what do you think about this*
Since we’re all calling for RR, I’ll chime in as well..
On one of the previous posts he made a claim that the Neutral theory of Evolution is a “thorn in the adaptionist’s side”. Which anyone with knowledge of Evolutionary Biology or population genetics understands how stupid that statement is. Adaptionism is still a large part of temporal phenotypic variation, whether it’s the main mechanism or not.
Recently it’s become clear that the Neutral theory is no longer tenable: how has the neutral theory fared in light of adaptive variation within and between species? In a word, poorly. While neutral models have without doubt begat tremendous theoretical fruits, including whole conceptual structures (e.g., the coalescent), the explanatory power of the neutral theory has never been exceptional. Five decades after its proposal, in the age of cheap genome sequencing and tremendous population genomic data sets, the explanatory power of the neutral theory looks even worse. In this perspective, we argue that with modern data in hand, each of the original lines of evidence for the neutral theory are now falsified, and that genomes are shaped in prominent ways by the direct and indirect consequences of natural selection.
https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/35/6/1366/4990884
Ouch….