Liberals have been complaining about what a fool Kanye West made of himself yesterday, by ranting incoherently at the white house and allowing himself to be used as a prop by President Trump.
However during the rant West claimed to have seen a psychologist and scored at the 98th percentile in IQ, but “only” the 75th percentile in repeating numbers. If this self-report can be trusted, it sounds like he was administered the WAIS-IV and got a full-scale IQ of 130 but a 110 in the working memory index.
Of course West also claimed to be a billionaire, so he seems prone to wild hyperbole (or confusion), however the IQ results sound more authentic because he gave a percentile (unlike many people who just claim an IQ) and it wasn’t astronomical (unlike most false high IQ claims), and because he also admitted to scoring mediocre in the repeating numbers section.
Of course liberals will consider him dumb not just because he’s a conservative, but because as a black man he should know better. However he might be smart enough to realize that unlimited (low-skilled) immigration is bad for the black community because it drives down wages, and thus may have given his Trump support more thought than meets the eye. And Trump’s tax cuts are certainly good for him as a business man.
There’s also the fact that West is supposedly very good at drawing, and might easily score 130+ on the Draw-a-Person IQ test.
It’s always interesting when a super rich person has some special talent that’s completely different from the talent for which they got rich, because it implies they have general intelligence, and are not just one-trick ponies who were in the right place at the right time.
Of course West doesn’t talk like someone with an IQ above 130, or even above 100, but having grown up middle class home with a PhD mother (high IQ DNA?), he may feel the need to sound especially ghetto to prove he’s part of hip-hop culture and not some privileged elite. Add to that his mediocre working memory (75th percentile) and long sentences might not be his forte. In addition, like a lot of creative people, he might be mentally ill, causing him to seem much dumber than he is.
Trump described him as a smart cookie, but whether that was sincere or condescension, I know not. Whatever Trump’s flaws, he’s probably very good at reading people.
Anyway, I hope West really does have a 98th percentile IQ. It’s always fascinating when a high IQ person gets rich in a field that has nothing to do with academics and required no academic credentials. It shows IQ tests really do measure intelligence and predict real world adaptive behavior and not just narrow book smarts.
Pumpkin Person 
everybody wants to BE somebody sometime.
a society without envy is a better society.
Yes a society where everyone accepts his or her place in the hierarchy gladly is the crown jewel of faggot elites the world over.
Once again muggy proves that Ed Meese rawdogs him every night and muggy says “please sir, I want so’more.”
now me….
I personally love the 2nd amendment for the fact that at any time, a person can look at this hierarchy and cast a ballot for the bullet.
the unfortunate fact about the mass shootings, etc. in the US is that there is no cohesion of angst. the perpetrators are separated by their identities and are unable to articulate what specifically is wrong that unifies all of them.
hint: the inequity, stupid.
almost 66% of the deadliest shootings in the last 50 years have come in the last 10 years.
the US is home to a third of the WORLD’S mass shootings for the last 50 years. and we have like what…4-6% of the population. it’s a sick society and it’s getting sicker…
…because of the rising inequality. the unfair hierarchy, etc. etc.
Muggy says “we gotta find a way to Brave New World the sucker!”
GIRLY MAN.
but getting back to the positive, rather than normative aspects of the blind conformity mr. SO-CALLED CYNIC advocates….
…if your demographics are mixed, the only way to ensure non-envy is to embrace multi-cultural identity for citizenship that revolves around something not tied to appearance. and, not required, but probably a good idea…those at the top MUST LOOK LIKE the empire as a whole.
just making up shit again. sad!
chris hedges can be added to the list of those who get it.
https://www.truthdig.com/articles/bankruptcy-american-left/
he’s not SAYING ANYTHING I’M NOT ALREADY SAYING…i’ve even discussed the MAIN prism that splits the identities in the modern age: white male patriarchy. This is why a black guy, an asian guy, a poor white guy, women etc. have their places in the hierarchy. To say that the left plays identity politics without realizing that the right does the same is to reveal complete retardation. civilized society for the common man = “identity politics.”
mainly, should x groups get MORE power or should they get LESS and it’s ZERO SUM. Left v. Right.
DOY, identities are handed out to Tower of Babel scatter communication about the main, i.e. ECONOMIC issue of society
“I think this country is a social powder keg. There is an anger that exists over working conditions and social inequality. However [much] they may be confused on many questions, workers in this country have a deep belief in democratic rights. We totally reject the narrative that the working class is racist. I think this has been the narrative pushed by the pseudo-left, middle-class groups who are drunk on identity politics, which have a vested interest in constantly distracting people from the essential class differences that exist in the society. Dividing everyone up on the basis of race, gender, sexual preference fails to address the major problem.”
A FUCKING IDIOT.
the working class IS RACIST and SEXIST and ABLEIST and EVERY OTHER -IST possible!
why?
Because the working class has SUCCESSFULLY BEEN CONFUSED AND LED INTO FALSE CONSCIOUSNESS.
A-DOYEEEEEE.
it may not be the common man’s fault that he is a fucking ideological nimrod, but facts are facts. the ruling class rules because they successfully divorce the common man’s REAL PROBLEMS from the common man’s ability to VOICE HIS REAL PROBLEM.
“man there’s an oppressive state that enforces inequality” = I HATE NIGGERS THEY TAKE MY SHIT.
“man there’s an oppressive state that enforces inequality” = CRACKA POLICE KILL ALL MAH FRIENDS
“man there’s an oppressive state that enforces inequality” = THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD PAY FOR MY BIRTH CONTROL, MISOGYNIST BASTARDS.
that muggy’s “understanding” of identity politics is one half of the partisan divide in America reveals that muggy is still spelled by the raw dog power of Ed Meese’s dick.
just making up shit again. claiming i said things i never said.
you need to commit yourself to a mental hospital.
my point is that you have said nothing.
the entire purpose behind national socialism is corporatism, i.e. everything in its proper place, i.e. that’s the function. so far, not much different than any other ideology of civilization.
the means is a national myth predicated on ancient birthright which fosters a “there but for the grace of god goes I” sentiment…
…which allows for a great tolerance of inequity. again, not so much different. there’s nothing special about national socialism. you’re just peddling one brand of ideology versus another, and an inferior brand when it comes to managing Empires.
and all this to-do about identity politics…also meaningless.
all politics is identity politics. to even frame the discussion around ‘the left’ reveals imbecility on the part of the speaker.
i keep trying to save you muggy…but you need to save yourself.
just say no to Eddie Meese.
thanks, but you’ve failed to save yourself from insanity already.
all the people on my list, swank is cleverer than every one of them?
after the dims lost to trump and almost lost to bernie what did they do? did they change their game plan? no. they just screamed “racism” and “russia” even louder.
has swank listened to this yet? he should, and then shut up. https://www.thisamericanlife.org/649/its-my-party-and-ill-try-if-i-want-to
proletariat and bourgeoisie are not identities in american identity politics. try again mein herr. inequality is not an identity. crumbling infratructure is not an identity. medicare for all is not an identity.
hitler was the most popular german politician ever, because his very interventionist policies actually did improve almost everyone’s life. or so says chomsky. i suppose he must be saved by swank too.
swank is an example of crazy short man syndrome.
all the people on my list, swank is cleverer than every one of them?
probably
after the dims lost to trump and almost lost to bernie what did they do? did they change their game plan? no. they just screamed “racism” and “russia” even louder.
there is no “change their game plan.” that’s what you don’t get.
politics — all politics = IDENTITY POLITICS.
there is no other game plan.
proletariat and bourgeoisie are not identities in american identity politics.
which is consistent with false consciousness, so way to be irrelevant…again.
hitler was the most popular german politician ever, because his very interventionist policies actually did improve almost everyone’s life. or so says chomsky.
nothing i said would be inconsistent with that.
i’ve only said that the NAZI ethos is nothing special.
but yes…populism tends to make politicians popular.
inequality is not an identity. crumbling infratructure is not an identity. medicare for all is not an identity.
the debates surrounding these and more are about identity.
for example…welfare.
a good idea for white trash.
but voted against because niggers may get it.
and if niggers get it, that means in the zero sum game of identity vs. identity, one identity gains more power than another. therefore, we vote against it. even though it hurts everyone in the end.
I can’t believe one person can be so wrong on every single topic. Its unbelievable. Even Afro made some sense talking about attraction. But swank, can mess up obvious things like ‘what made rome great’ all the way to ‘what is the purpose of a judge’.
Name 1 thing Swank you are right about?
Swank always has these generalist opinions that you could get from asking a taxi driver.
“Whats politics about? About different groups of people looking for money, women and status.”
“What is the law? Whatever elites can get away with”
A 5 year old gives these exact same kinds of answers.
5 year olds have more social perception than most adults….so I don’t disagree.
Phil: this is so easy even a 3 year old would figure it out
Swank: get Phil a 3 year old before he embarrasses himself…again
The fact that you can’t see that the answers I gave to those questions are the EXACT correct answers speaks volumes of the ideological fuckwithery that has owned your brain
Actually a 5 year old would say it straight out like that and save our time. Swank has to turn a 1 sentence concept into 550 words all the time.
Rome was powerful when citizens formed the backbone of the army.
Rome was weakened when it started hiring mercenaries to hold onto lands that weren’t economically worth keeping.
Now, either Machievelli has the wrong answer and Swank has the correct one about diversity being Romes ‘strength’. Or swank as usual is crowbarring in something Rabbi Tim Wise would say about a topic.
You don’t have the chops to understand nuance but hiring foreigners =! Inclusive criteria on who can be a citizen. Unwavering allegiance to the sovereign would be one such criteria. Mercenaries, as non citizens especially, don’t have it.
And the mercenaries really weren’t anything more than a symptom of the larger problem of military spending becoming a blackhole because of how huge the Empire was. And political corruption because of an inferior governmental structure surrounding succession, etc.
rome was just a brutal military dictatorship with 40% of its people in slavery, and according to this https://historum.com/threads/the-national-ethnic-origins-of-roman-emperors.19034/ of the 48 emperors up to constantine, 8 were at least part non-european, 21 were italian, 5 gaulish, 5 illyerian, and the rest were dacian, moesian, danubian or unkown.
septimus severus was one of those 8. but how african was he?
Born on 11 April 145 at Leptis Magna (in present-day Libya) as the son of Publius Septimius Geta and Fulvia Pia,[1] Septimius Severus came from a wealthy and distinguished family of equestrian rank. He had Italian Roman ancestry on his mother’s side and descended from Punic – and perhaps also Libyan – forebears on his father’s side.
rome had no black emperors, chinese emperors, curry muncher emperors, aztec emperors, tahitian emperors, abo emperors, or jewish emperors.
all of its emperors look white.
rome lasted because:
1. some made up shit by swank.
2. marxist explanation: the senatorial families profited from it, and rome had superior technology to its conquered peoples. all roads lead to swank’s gaping butthole.
further the idea that rome was a melting pot is easily disproven. how? modern day italians have exactly 0% trace of any non-european ancestry.
It was becoming a multi culti ‘melting pot’ that destroyed Rome. Those mercenaries werent always paid in money, often it was land, and many lived under the aegis of the empire constantly being more of a thorn in Roman leaderships side than actual opposing armies.
Reminds me of a similar situation today in america.
of the 48 emperors up to constantine, 8 were at least part non-european, 21 were italian, 5 gaulish, 5 illyerian,
which means you were wrong.
1. some made up shit by swank.
2. marxist explanation: the senatorial families profited from it, and rome had superior technology to its conquered peoples. all roads lead to swank’s gaping butthole.
1 is the means to 2. STOP TRYING TO SAY ANYTHING ABOUT MARX. you can’t understand him past the page.
go read Piketty re: the Roman Market Economy and then apologize to me and everyone else for daring say that Rome wasn’t multi-cultural in the same way that NYC was.
all of its emperors look white.
way to analyze pre-modern cultural divisions with modern cultural divisions. hallmark move of a retard.
in Roman times, the primary divider was by territory/town/place of birth. it held just as much, if not more, sway as race does today.
In Ancient Greece, the broadest basis of social identity in at that time was either the individual city-state or the Greeks (Hellenes) as a group. The Stoics, who later took Diogenes’ idea and developed it, typically stressed that each human being “dwells […] in two communities – the local community of our birth, and the community of human argument and aspiration”.[6] A common way to understand Stoic cosmopolitanism is through Hierocles’ circle model of identity that states that we should regard ourselves as concentric circles, the first one around the self, next immediate family, extended family, local group, citizens, countrymen, humanity.
race isn’t there. so it’s irrelevant that the emperors “looked white.” that wasn’t even a “thing” in those days.
the greeks thought the ethiopians were the most beautiful people in the world. so obviously skin color/’racial features’ weren’t a basis of discrimination.
Can i please get an source on “the greeks thought the ethiopians were the most beautiful people in the world”?
“The Ethiopians to whom Cambyses sent these gifts are reputed to be the tallest and most beautiful of all peoples.” -Herodotus.
mug of pee,
roman empire was built by copying a lot of ideas from the achaemenid empire. Rome military also copied a lot of hannibal’s military tactics later. As for roman empire’s technology ….they picked up a lot from greeks. Who in turn picked up a lot from anatolia, egypt and mesopotamia earlier. If not the actual products but a lot of math and concepts that go into the product. Roman concrete was roman, but it was a discovery.
Rome actually used mercenaries to take many lands outside rome and thereby become powerful in the first place. North african mercenaries to defeat carthage etc.
Rome when it crossed its borders and became an empire took all the help of other ethnicties it could get, to conquer its territories.
And rome itself was not a single ethno state. People of the northernmost part of the italian peninsula and some etruscans were part celtic. Southern tip italians and sicilians were part greek and carthaginian.
Every single ethnicity in the world is mixed with other ethnicities. Be it romans or others. Except probably some isolated island ethnicty or tribe. Or those in remote forests like the amazon.
The army was like 80% Roman italian (not all italians were roman). Yes, the mercenaries were good.
People on the guardian comment sections say this type of ‘logical’ thinking^^^
ANTTHH WERE ALL DESCENDED FROM MOTHER AFRICA!!!!!
Rome could only feed those people thanks to MENA: https://pumpkinperson.com/2018/10/12/kanye-wests-iq/comment-page-1/#comment-104319
Saying that the roman army becoming more multicultural establishes an spurious relationship, as the foreigners came becuase of romans being slaughtered and that other regions had become sophisticated enough to te able to trade soldiers efficiently, as they had to be trained more in the past. Thats like saying nazi germany lost thanks to having their last armies be french volunteres. Rome was already dead when the forieners started enculturating the ranks.
The dumb thing is that Rome lost their eastern half becuase they were so pendantic about purity as you are. Swanks talks about cultural genocide are correct, as later showed by the Catholoic church sustaining themselves well during the “dark ages. Even in your model the differences of race arent that big as the empire was mostly greek (i assume Anatolians and Syrians are “greek”, do you thinkt thats unfair=) and european.
How come you don’t understand basic logical thinking? If the 7 towns come together and go on to dominate the known world is it because
(a) they had no solidarity
(b) didn’t make other tribes slaves I.E 2nd class citizens. (Please count how many native born romans became slaves vs non roman)
(c) they embraced rabbi tim wises teachings on what makes non Israel countries strong.
The answer is none of the above.
The romans didnt dominate the world but supplied peace and trade. It was only when corruption being possible through raising armies in other areas and starting self sustaining governments (and outer lands getting more powerfull, helping the cause of non-romans, especially north western europe) causing the need of non-romans for the empire to dissapear that the empire collapsed.
“(Please count how many native born romans became slaves vs non roman)”
There were different cultural customs on to how slavery was done that the romans didnt interfere in. The non-roman areas had sold slaves abroad for long before romans bought them. The thing was that rome started to decrease domestic slaves while there wasnt any reform in the provinces. Urbanisation made different types of agricultural slavery unescessary as they could import grain from Egypt. You must also take the living standards of the slaves into account, not all slaves were treated equal.
North western europe was different however, but the xenophobia against gauls and germanic resistance pretty much shows that Rome had to be harder on making the non-romans more roman, as shown with Gaul being more allinged with romans compared to germanics.
Jewish infiltration of dysgenics doesnt matter here as mentioned earlier.
Anyone that uses the phrase ‘white male patriarchy’ in a non ironic fashion has an IQ below 40.
Quite frankly, anyone that uses the term ‘racist’ in a serious way is either pretending i.e. jewish like swank or is also someone with an IQ below 40.
If you read whats out there and live in a ‘multicultural’ environment like London/NY/Paris, you should be able to work out within about 1 month why the world works the way it works and why people immigrate to paris and not Kinshasa or Cairo.
But people don’t come to hold racist beliefs by living in multi cultural environments, assclown. They learn these beliefs from other people who also most likely have not doneso.
No one suddenly becomes racist AFTER dealing with other races. Stop ignoring reality. It’s learned, not derived from empirical observation.
And if you don’t think there is a such thing as white male patriarchy then you’ve just doubled down on sucking whatever hate spewing cock lets you swallow your own oppression a little more smoothly.
In your case it’s talking points about jews and darkies.
swank is so utterly out of touch with reality he should be taking anti-psychotics.
But people don’t come to hold racist beliefs by living in multi cultural environments just making up shit again, assclown. They learn these beliefs from other people FALSE who also most likely have not doneso FALSE. and what is a “racist” belief? “racism” doesn’t mean ANYTHING anymore. it’s just a way to permanently distract the 99% and control them. it used to be “racism” meant the belief that the most important thing about a person is his race. no one is a racist..
No one suddenly becomes racist AFTER dealing with other races LIE!. Stop ignoring reality INDEED!. It’s learned, not derived from empirical observation. LIE! and since when may one not learn from empirical observation?
And if you don’t think there is a such thing as white male patriarchy then you’ve just doubled down on sucking whatever hate spewing cock lets you swallow your own oppression a little more smoothly. swank hates himself because he’s not white or male. this is sad!
In your case it’s talking points about jews and darkies. swank is either retarded or a jew. there is no third possibility.
^^^ Total rubbish.
muggy calls the Ed Meese playbook “reality.”
just making up shit again,
No one suddenly becomes racist AFTER dealing with other races LIE!.
75% of white people DO NOT HANG AROUND BLACKS AT ALL. How can they learn anything empirically about blacks if most don’t even interact with them on a human level? A priori “niggers must be bad” logic? Get your head out of your ass.
racism” doesn’t mean ANYTHING anymore.
“a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race”
no one is a racist..
yes, that’s why names that “sound” black are discriminated against in hiring, that’s why de facto segregation and real estate steering occurs by RACE, that’s why the U.S. keeps re-fighting the civil war, etc.
etc.
etc.
Jive-ass Anglo Turkey.
swank hates himself because he’s not white or male. this is sad!
muggy continues to reveal that he cannot SYNTHESIZE anything about Marx or ideology and apply it to the real world.
most WHITE MEN are not WHITE MEN under patriarchy.
what do you think your OWN POINT regarding Elon Musk refers to?
WHERE DO THE EXPECTATIONS COME FROM?
dumb muthafucka…can’t even understand yourself.
Seank is mentally retarded if he reallly thinks racism is a learned trait. Not being racist is a learned trait. Swank is trolling.
no phil. you really are a much shittier person than you believe and you’re shilling for all the worst humanity has to offer.
https://psmag.com/social-justice/small-children-arent-inherently-racist
of course, this just means that infants are preferring individuals who look like the people they are already familiar with, which != racism.
nuance. dig it.
You should quote straight from Rabbi Tim, rather then people brainwashed by Rabbi Tims ilk next time. It would get to the point much quicker rather than me having to click through to New York City University and read the bios of the retardates doing these studies to ‘prove’ racism is evil. She doesn’t believe in race as a hereditary concept either btw.
1. europeans HATE each other.
2. europeans are much more alike than any europeans are alike to any non-europeans.
conclusion: europeans will never be cured of their “racism”.
the EU is undemocratic. democracy is always only approximate, but the homogeneous nation-state is always much more democratic than the empire or the new world country or any former colony country.
By the way the title of the video is also ‘cucky’ The guys labels the left ‘intolerant’.
Psychologically giving into the frame of your opponent by valuing his ideals and using his language and concepts to judge things means you already lose.
Who the fuck cares of the left is intolerant. Point of fact its more tolerant than the right. I mean the whole purpose of ‘the left’ today is to be very tolerant to non gentiles. Thats the whole point of it hahaha. We all know Chuck Schumer and Hilary and Blair and Renzi are given next to no orders to help working class people unless they are black or brown or some weird psychological disorder like trans.
I remember a few years back there was this argument by the gingrich type ‘conservatives’ that the (((left))) was patronising the minorities by speaking for them and not encouraging ‘self sufficiency’. Only a homosexual would resort to boot licking like that.
Then the medium IQ types that went to college start using out of context marxist phrases to embolden the brown people the rise up against the goy…i mean white patriarchy. I read guardian = i know better. Intellectual yet idiot as Taleb says.
If you are going to debate someone, say what youre selling. Stop bending the knee. If you keep bending the knee aspy people like Bill Gates gets a pain in his head and gets very confused about basic concepts.
I bet if you asked bill to say whats the difference between liberal and conservative he would say ‘racism’, not out loud like that, but in about 550 words like (((swank))))
You cant differenciate from when Bill is lying and when he is honest. You think he always is being honest since he speaks in an autistic way. You are being played. The correlation between autists and their belief in things bill says is becuase bill is like an father figure to them (as technology gives nerds access to money and esteem, and that bills liberalism in synthesis with science and education being the awnser to everything is the only thing the autist can look up to and even understand to begin with), but Bill is lying to them while the autists regurgitate the silicon valley peoples talking point.
No wonder the psychiatrist called you autistic.
so rome was NOT multicultural or multiracial in the way that the US, canada, western europe are. the flow of people into italy was too small to measure.
saying rome was diverse is like saying the british empire was diverse even though britain was NOT.
only a jew could claim rome was diverse in the way NYC or london is diverse.
Revenue from the British colonies were an significantly lower part of the total revenue (or GDP) than what the non-roman provinces were.
An better analogy would be the Russian empire as income equality (between the ethnic groups) and trade were very present, as it was inside the Roman empire.
The non-british white areas were very small in population. Brown areas were poor (India), had harsh climates, didnt give any revenue (india) or were unpopulated (large parts of Africa).
Hongkong and Singapore were very good assets for commerse and revenue.
Though your point about britain itself being homogenous might sound correct, untill one realises that an empire has to share traits, so an polity that claims to rule the world but doesnt, doesnt, as people woulndt care about the polity.
Then how was britain an empire? Becuase it governed its colonial subjects in an manner very different to how the Romans ruled over theirs. as mentioned above. The british empire was really only some cities abroad and India (where governance was limited), but british rule over their colonial countries dissapeared once the non-white regions became countries, meaning that the british never ruled over most of the countries they allegedly claimed to (For example zambia). Most of the british empire didnt exist, and so it isnt comparable to Rome as Rome was an actuall empire.
The “traits” i talk about is the different types of allegence possible to give to an polity, thus “people wouldnt care about the polity” being relevant.
Swank knows all this. Hes trolling. Only a total hack would claim Rome’s strength was its diversity.
But the influence of the empire on the city of Rome itself was, if anything, more dramatic. In the space of just a couple of hundred years (between the third and first centuries BC), imperial conquests turned Rome into the world’s first cosmopolitan city of a million inhabitants – a place where your neighbour might come from Scotland or Syria, and where the sights, tastes and experiences of every single person must have been affected by imports from abroad.
The Roman citizen body was as diverse as that of any city in the world had ever been – or, until the 20th century, would ever be. You can still see telltale “foreign” names all over the surviving epitaphs – Marcus Vergilius Eurysaces, the prosperous baker (with a last name that would have sounded distinctively Eastern to Italian ears), whose grand tomb playfully imitates the ovens of his professional life, to Baricha, Zabda and Achiba, three Jews captured after a revolt in Judaea, who ended up in Rome, first as slaves then, in due course, comfortable Roman citizens.
Some modern historians have found this multicultural mixture of Roman citizenship rather disquieting. In the Thirties, Mussolini’s coterie of writers loudly bemoaned the way in which the original, rugged, “pure” Italian stock had been polluted by the servile blood of oriental immigrants. But the truth was that the Romans had always been a pretty mixed bunch, as their own myths insisted. Most ancient people traced their origins back to the very soil on which their city was built: the legend was, for example, that the first generations of Athenians and Spartans had miraculously sprung up from the territories of Athens and Sparta. By contrast, the Romans’ myths celebrated their foreign roots. Aeneas, the heroic founder of Alba Longa, the forerunner to Rome, had fled the city of Troy (in modern Turkey) after its destruction by the perfidious Greeks with their wooden horse. Romulus himself had been a local lad, but had populated his new city by advertising for asylum seekers.
The result is that by the first century, Rome was a city of imported people, living off – and sometimes making a nice living out of – imported goods. It wasn’t just that the Roman population now could spice up their food with pepper from the East; a good number of them were employed in the pepper and spice business. Tombstones again give us a glimpse of the men and woman who worked at the “pepper exchange” (horrea piperataria) and other such specialised markets – and that’s in addition to all the sailors, businessmen, money-changers and transporters involved in bringing it to Italy in the first place.
DNA studies show that only the Greek colonization of Sicily and Southern Italy had a lasting effect on the local genetic landscape.
How many americans are blue eyed and light haired?
Actuallly the British empire is a good analogy.
Swanky is trying to say that the british navy became dominant and world class because 5% of the British army was indian gurka and/or other subjected peoples.
Mind bending retardation.
this is what i said, which you can’t understand:
anyone with a non-aborted brain can see that as territory expands, local custom and cultures will differ, and a high degree of tolerance of local practice is necessary to ensure low-cost compliance.
Swank,
Cant you just kill off the other culture and make the winning one bigger. Of course the bigger one will have to change thanks to change in mode of production but my point is to havean culture unified within an government seems like “good form”, no?
The british empire was barely an multi ethnic empire as India wasnt dependent on britain! Nor britain dependent on India!
Im still waiting for swank to say the jews were kicked out of israel by the romans because they didnt have enough diversity.
^^^^^
When Swank says these words, I will take back everything I said.
There is absolutely no reason for the jews to have ruined Rome Philo, it was the most profitable enterprise in the world. If they would have infultrated rome, they would have done everything to sustain it as that would be the only way that they could have ruled the world efficiently. Also, Roman jews were no khazars but the current day palestinians most likely.
NOT coincidentally ancient gaul and illyria overlapped what is today italy. part of italy includes parts of what were gaul and illyria. so the gaulish and illyrian emperors were really just italian.
recall afro making the romans vs gauls distinction in contemporary france. in roman times france was celtic. the gauls spoke a celtic language, like welsh.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaulish_language
well actually the only overlap with ancient illyria may just be trieste.
but yuge hunk of gaul is now in italy.
and talk about trying to apply new categories to old realities…
will historians 800 years from now describe the US as an empire like the roman empire or british empire?
if so the US empire is even more diverse than the US.
which US state hates trump the most?
its whitest!
contradictions in the system.
you’re either with us or against us.
(((swank))): it’s all good as long as the very rich and the homeless are a random sample of the various identities.
mugabe: there should not be any homeless, and there don’t need to be any homeless.
NO THAT IS NOT WHAT I SAID, DICKTURD.
marx say
so long as some portion of populous must work to sustain society, there will be
ideology
purpose of ideology is to paper over contradictions in base economic system i.e. master:slave
false consciousness is key element of any ideology and consists of dividing the working class…via…
identities
by playing these identities off one another, the elites maintain their power and the status quo. in modern capitalism, this involves the manufacture of consent, where the commoner thinks he has made the choice to vote against himself
swank say an effective way to achieve this is to have the elites resemble the commoners and get them to identify more with those various identities than the raw economic facts of ‘they’re up there and we’re down here.’
but swank does not say this is the RIGHT way or that it OUGHT to be this way.
he only say
that it is this way
just repeating what i’ve already said 1 million times.
swank repeats me, then claims i repeat him. (((typical.)))
thanks for coming out as a nazi. the power of christ was too much for you, you love big mugabe.
…to achieve this…
what’s “this”? italy overrun by mexicans?
”just repeating what i’ve already said 1 million times.”
yes.
muggy you ignorant slut
white light : ideology and how it works (what swank say above)
color from prism: national socialism
my POINT is that the demographics and current identities in play within the United States make anything BUT a multi-cultural idea of citizenship unworkable and stupid.
so no, i came out against Nazi-ism.
you, however, just came out…
good for you.
fun fact: if me and you are saying the same things, then the guy you keep referring to as ‘getting it,’ is in fact a fucking idiot.
so the really big diff between us is…
mugabe: the US will continue its trajectory since the carter (trilateral commission) administration into becoming a full-on latin american country. not in the racial sense, but in the economic and political sense.
swank: i must believe LIES in order to believe my beloved country is worth saving.
the state which hates trump the most is its richest and its whitest and the home of the only charterhouse in north america, vermont.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_non-Hispanic_white_population
and yes! in terms of median household wealth, VT is the richest state in the union.
it’s almost as if empirical observation is what makes people racists. but only a ridiculous jew would claim otherwise.
swank: the trajectory of inequality is nothing new and comes and goes in cycles
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e7/U.S._Income_Shares_of_Top_1%25_and_0.1%25_1913-2013.png.
the main goal of any country is to ensure the populace can tolerate and cope with their economic situation, which is the econmic master:slave situation present in all societies. if your demographics include a lot of people who are different colors, your ideal citizen CANNOT be tied to the idea of one specific color/appearance. to say anything different is stupid.
muggy: [gagging on Hitler’s cock while Meese hits it from the back]
the state which hates trump the most is its richest and its whitest and the home of the only charterhouse in north america, vermont.
irrelevant. politics = WWE for adults. it’s like saying that the state that hates Stone Cold Steve Austin is its poorest and whitest. it demonstrates nothing but where the star plays as a heel vs where he plays as a hero.
no. sanders is senator from VT. VT is also the most supportive of socialism and has an independence movement. larger than any other state’s, it’s actually serious.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Vermont_Republic
the point is VT confirms:
1. national socialist ideology.
2. that anti-racism results from lack of experience, racism from experience. (although racism is also innate.)
(although racism is also innate.)
SHOW ME THE GENES FUCKTARD
no. sanders is senator from VT.
translation: I’m rooting for the Macho Maaaaan Randy Savage! Ooooooooooh YEAAAAAH!
that anti-racism results from lack of experience, racism from experience
racism results from the experience of being conditioned. again, most white people DO NOT interact with black people. so the vast majority of ANY BELIEFS about blacks or other races come from CONDITIONING and MEDIA coverage (if you want to say that is not lopsided, go ahead…you’ll be wrong).
anti-racism results from common sense: every person ought to be judged as an individual in everyday life.
several experiments confirm that people — in the absence of any information — when told X group of people (often those they just met in the same room) are ‘bad’ or ‘worse,’ they IMMEDIATELY AND WITHOUT PRIOR CONFIRMATION begin treating those people worse.
get your head out of your ass, wipe it with the confederate flag, and then burn that thing for good
of course, VT does confirm that (1) a populace united by a common identity will embrace voting in their own economic interests (which is not UNIQUE TO national socialism, for the umpteenth time) and (2) the factors that allow VT to act in this way are not factors that will successfully scale to the entirety of the united states, thanks to demographics…
…because identities like those in national socialism CANNOT and WILL NOT work over large geographic areas.
if you had invested $100 USD in USB in 1973, how much would you have today, divs reinvested?
this proves the future isn’t everything.
the answer is…you’d have more than $60m USD today.
so much luck.
Gibbon gave a classic formulation of reasons why the Fall happened. He began an ongoing controversy by attributing a significant role to Christianity in the Western Roman Empire’s fall, which is no longer accepted by modern Roman historians.[6] However, he did give great weight to other causes of internal decline as well and to the attacks from outside the Empire.
The story of its ruin is simple and obvious; and, instead of inquiring why the Roman empire was destroyed, we should rather be surprised that it had subsisted so long. The victorious legions, who, in distant wars, acquired the vices of strangers and mercenaries , first oppressed the freedom of the republic, and afterwards violated the majesty of the purple. The emperors, anxious for their personal safety and the public peace, were reduced to the base expedient of corrupting the discipline which rendered them alike formidable to their sovereign and to the enemy; the vigour of the military government was relaxed, and finally dissolved, by the partial institutions of Constantine (i.e ((((Christianity)))) from Israel ; and the Roman world was overwhelmed by a deluge of Barbarians.
— Edward Gibbon. The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, “General Observations on the Fall of the Roman Empire in the West”, Chapter 38
An empire that was a genuine multi ethnic empire where most of the minorities weren’t outright slaves was the Austro-Hungarian empire.
But nobody would say that was successful and the genetic and cultural distance between magyars and germanics is not an abyss like between say ashkenazi jews and residents of Chicagos south side.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_the_Western_Roman_Empire#Reasons
Interesting read. Very game of thrones like stories.
“Corruption, in this context the diversion of public finance from the needs of the army, may have contributed greatly to the Fall. The rich senatorial aristocrats in Rome itself became increasingly influential during the fifth century; they supported armed strength in theory, but did not wish to pay for it or to offer their own workers as army recruits.[88][89] They did, however, pass large amounts of money to the Christian Church.[90] At a local level, from the early fourth century, the town councils lost their property and their power, which often became concentrated in the hands of a few local despots beyond the reach of the law.[91]”
And why do elites stop contributing to public defence?
When they have nothing in common with the people below them.
This is why the US doesn’t have a welfare state and Canada does. Because its elite is jewish and its people are in the process of being replaced by coolies.
This explains also why Japan doesn’t slide into corruption spirals. Because its elite have, theres a phrase for it, a latin phrase i think that describes the nobilitys responsibility to the serfs.
This also explains how someone can be really right wing and believe quite logically in a socialist programme for economic organisation.
Actually I think I read somewhere Japan was the first nation to have universal nationalised healthcare based on the emphasis it put on the army.
Latin America is a good example of what happens when your elite is not the same race as the serf. Its not good. And the US is no exception now that its elite is (((elite))). I actually have to commend Steve Sailer for writing about Latin America so much. I would know very little about its de facto hereditary aristocracies otherwise.
Question
Why does the Western Deep State endorse homosexuality so much as in Argentina?
same-sex marriage in Argentina) in 2009. Macri did not appeal the ruling, saying that same-sex marriage was becoming universally accepted and individuals had a right to happiness. He compared the controversy with the sanctioning of divorce during the 1980s after the restoration of democracy in Argentina; highly controversial at first, it was eventually accepted.[53] A federal law permitting same-sex marriage was passed the following year.[54]
Macri’s refusal to appeal the sentence affected his relationship with Archbishop Jorge Bergoglio (who later became Pope Francis). Bergoglio opposed same-sex marriage, and expected Macri to appeal the ruling. According to the archbishop, it was not up to a lower-court judge to rule on the constitutionality of a law and Macri should have appealed the ruling in a higher court. Bergoglio was also annoyed by what he considered a lack of communication between him and Macri.
Answer
Jews control the tiller. Its not kafkaesque chaos. There is a hand on the tiller, even in Latin America and even with a former pre-dominant cult there.
A secondary theory is my own personal theory that homosexuality is somewhat environmental and aristocrat or upper/middle class households will have a disproportionate amount of homosexual offspring.
It would be interesting to compare views on homos in Sparta vs Athens and see whether a masculine culture made a difference.
Actually I know of a number of black homosexuals and that ‘being on the down low’ is suprisingly common in pretty butch black societies. So maybe my theory is wrong.
I mean in Africa they still eat people so if that hasn’t reduced homosexuality to zero there it must have a strong genetic component as well.
Actually I know of a number of black homosexuals
how the fuck would you a (presumably) white man come into contact with enough black people and know them well enough to discover them as being on the low?
By know I meant know of.
HOW?
75% OF WHITES HAVE NO BLACK FRIENDS YOU FUCKEN LYIN CRACKA-ASS-CRACKA
so let’s see…a guy who dislikes blacks and has alt-right political views SOMEHOW gets in enough with (1) whites-who-are-in-with-black-homosexuals or (2) blacks who are in with black homosexuals.
either you’re lying or you’re having homosexual sex with black men.
there is no other rational explanation.
Or I lived in London and worked in a job title that wasn’t ‘advanced day trader situated in basement for maximum objectivity on market signals’ or some other nonsense youd come up with.
Yes, because co-workers share their lives and the lives of others “like that.”
…
https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/3551c4e0-55ce-4071-9854-d07ca969f767#BJ8eOMjPsX.copy
…oh wait. you must be gay yourself and into interracial gay stuff.
it’s the only rational explanation.
NO REALLY, IT IS!
and that’s hilarious.
Can you elaborate lol?
So 1 thing you would right into a constitution is a jus sanguine connect between elite and serf.
Otherwise the elites will abuse the serfs wantonly.
See: US today, Latin America today.
The east asian countries are good examples of co-ethnic elite/serf relations.
drew faust was not a jew. i learned today harvard has a new president so it’s happened again.
the presidents of harvard, yale, princeton, MIT, and caltech are all jews.
the president of stanford is not.
must just be ’cause they’s so superior interlectually. am i right y’all?
if you think jews aren’t a problem you’re either a jew or a moron.
100% . If you think these people ended up at the top by complete accidebt despite being 2% of tge population at best youre out of your mind. I bet their tenures correlate with how many people leave with socially liberal/decsdent beliefs.
This is interresting. Is there any evidence for IQ really being normally distributed in the extremes PP? Becuase if not, and the SD of jewish IQ be more lopsided to the extreme right of the distribution, then an large share of Jewish domination would be explained.
Swank, whats your take on jews being so liberal? are they just faking it to fit in with the liberal crowd, but why mainly liberal crowd?
“Swank, whats your take on jews being so liberal? are they just faking it to fit in with the liberal crowd, but why mainly liberal crowd?”
Oh god…….
You need to go back a grade.
for mouse, the liberal/conservative dichotomy is fake news.
there are some jews who are genuinely liberal, but for the most part jews are “liberal” for tribal reasons. that’s the jewish tribe, not the liberal tribe. it’s the same for most white “liberals”. it’s not that they really believe XYZ, it’s that pretending to believe XYZ distinguishes them from people they hate…or they’ve just been brainwashed.
I think the white liberals believe in it much like the way people believed/believe what preachers, imams and ministers say. A strong element of bandwagoning and child indoctrination.
unfortunately muggy can’t understand this logic also applies to the MIGHTY ANGLO WHITE MAN.
jews cannot exploit what isn’t already broken.
jews are only playing the game better than the game makers.
or is that…hate the game not the player?
what puts people on top in this society, PERIOD is not merit. period.
Then what is it? luck? then how come the luck their way into almost every domain?
typical jew excuse. blame the WASPs.
is the game fair, muggy?
if the game was fair, would the evil joose be able to do joo-joo voodoo?
…
exactly.
of course they would fucktard if they cheat, or they make the rules.
fucking jew. sad!
that makes no sense. the dominant group is the only group who can cheat at the game of civilization and win and they are the group that makes the rules. that’s how it works.
heads I win, tails you lose
and you couldn’t have a minority group existing within a majority group with such outsize success, if that minority group were outright cheating.
…
they play the game well.
better than the game makers.
and that’s what pisses them off.
Italians like jews, yannow. Probably because Italians have no illusions about the game….
Id love to see swanks lsat exam paper. He reading comprehension is bizarre. His verbal reasoning is mangled.
uhhh…
italian americans are playing the game much less well than the jews.
italian americans aren’t even playing the game as well as irish americans.
the italian american is the LAST “white ethnic”.
and it’s only in the east.
italians in the west are totally non-descript, like the irish.
joltin’ joe was from SF!
sad!
conclusion:
swank is from staten island, philly, or buffalo.
his parents were racists and he hates his parents.
OR
swank is a jew.
mug of pee ,
Italians who were white tried to conquer and loot the then known world. Britain who were white looted india. They gave opium addiction to China. Spanish gave disease ridden blankets to native Americans. Not to mention brits causing two great famine s in india where millions starved to death. And King Leopold antics in the Congo. Portugese pulling the eyelids of Indians in goa. Germans killing millions of Jews, slavs and gypsies. French antics in north Africa.
Your fav Romans killing hundreds of thousands of Celts in Britain. Your country?
I consider italians and spanish not white. Theyre latin. Christiano ronaldo could pass for a mexican easily
True.
White people are people with pink nipples and light eyes/hair whom also reproduce people with said traits if coupulated with another white person. Saying otherwise is saying that Indians are persians and egyptians sudanese.
pill has no idea what mexicans look like.
spanish and italians are 100% european. a few portuguese have a tiny smidgen of black african like ronaldo. but he’s from madeira not the mainland.
two portuguese americans in the news recently, devin nunes and ernest moniz.
iirc the spanish have no detectable moorish ancestry.
interestingly the tallest head of state ever was a basque, and they aren’t even indo-european, Sancho VII of Navarre. surprising because the spanish are europe’s shortest national population. sardinia isn’t a sovereign state.
the guanches of the canary islands had blond hair and were extremely tall. island gigantism maybe. blue eyes are still much more common in the canary islands than in mainland spain.
Cristiano Ronaldo is mixed
I have a prove
https://usatftw.files.wordpress.com/2017/11/epa_epaselect_portugal_people_cristiano_ronaldo_ai_89883674-e1511799872950.jpg?w=1000&h=600&crop=1
Ronaldo has no black ancestry. Like many iberians he gets that hue probably from the berbers and other north africans that settled there before Granada.
Next 10 claims by swank:
1. The usa was founded on the ideal of open borders globalism
2. Israel is a jewish nation and must be defended by western millitaries at all cost
3. There are no racial differences in anything except how people are treated.
4. If you treated certain barbaric minorities like geniuses they would become geniuses capable of civilisation.
5. The supreme court exists to entrench the morality created in the 1960s by leading thinkers such as ‘debauched’ mlk and ‘the seer’ rabbi stephen wise
6. Racism is a big problem ( i agree. Jewish elites need to treat their gentile underlings better)
7. Intelligence is soically constructed.
8. The reason why rome was great was because it was founded in aftica.
9. Whites cause the most violence closely followed by east asian elderly and bunny rabbits.
10. Women find short gamma male type jewish men wildly sexually attractive.
top 10 claims by phil:
(1) phil can read
(2) phil can read
(3) phil can read
(4) phil can read
(5) phil can read
(6) phil can read
(7) phil can read
(8) phil can read
(9) phil can read
(10) phil can read
swank is proof that low IQ jews are admitted to top 10 law schools.
Unemployme nt at 3.7%. Following the way they changed the definition of employment in the 80s that number is meaningless. Its quite amusing because trumpy kept saying the real unemployment number was 16% 2 years ago. Hes right. But i dont expect him to use the number that includes ‘discouraged workers’
Swanl will now say unemployment is defined as whatever elites can get away with.
Very good swank.
indeed. but the real level is slightly less than it was a few years ago.
http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/unemployment-charts
Dont forget underemployment too!
I was thinking if i treated my life like an rpg video game i would be not a basement dwelling person. Everything seems so easy and ive done it before. Its a pity i cab do all this but have shitty genetics vis neurosis.
stop malingering and come out of the closet as one who doesn’t want what other people want or one who is unwilling to do what it takes to have what he deserves.
an old adage:
those who seek power and wealth are among those who should never have them.
muggy loves repeating nonsense:
those who seek power and wealth are among those who should never have them.
most anyone who has any power and prestige sought it.
the only way non-aristocratic rule can exist is if others seek power and prestige.
are you in favor of a permanent unchanging, hereditary aristocracy?
people just repeat these fucking idioms….
most anyone who has any power and prestige sought it.USUALLY AND THE FISH ROTS FROM THE HEAD. BUT NOT ALWAYS. SOME SIMPLY DO WHAT THEY LOVE OTHERS INHERIT. the only way non-aristocratic rule can exist is if others seek power and prestige. FALSE. just more lies from swank the jew retard. people who try wearry wearry hawd still can’t score high on objective standardized tests. try again jew-bot.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_examination
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sortition
shirley actually takes the ideology of meritocracy seriously
Intense pressure to succeed meant that cheating and corruption were rampant, often outrunning strenuous attempts to prevent or defeat them. The Ming-dynasty Book of Swindles (ca. 1617) contains an entire section of stories about “Corruption in Education,” most of which involve swindlers exploiting exam-takers’ desperate attempts to bribe the examiner.[58] In order to discourage favoritism which might occur if an examiner recognized a student’s calligraphy, each exam was recopied by an official copyist. Exact quotes from the classics were required; misquoting even one character or writing it in the wrong form meant failure, so candidates went to great lengths to bring hidden copies of these texts with them, sometimes written on their underwear.[59] The Minneapolis Institute of Arts holds an example of a Qing dynasty cheatsheet, a handkerchief with 10,000 characters of Confucian classics in microscopically small handwriting.[60]
Those selected through lot underwent examination called dokimasia in order to avoid ‘incompetent’ officials. (who decides what incompetence in the realm of politics means, jive-ass anglo turkey?)
neither of these processes seriously contends with the raw power of striving…for power.
cheating in standardized tests, grades, etc. is rampant.
i remember a guy who had his father (an MD) write him ridiculous notes with DX that allowed him extra time on exams.
Stewart: During the course of your investigation, what did you discover about the process of taking the SAT and the security associated with taking an SAT test?
Rice: How incredibly easy it is to cheat the system. There is absolutely no security in place whatsoever to prevent criminal impersonation like we see here from happening.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-perfect-score-cheating-on-the-sat/
that muggy would even say the dumb shit he says is proof that he’s a jive-ass Ed Meese fucktoy.
i have remarked here many times that an hereditary aristocracy is in some ways (not in toto) preferable to a “meritocracy” however construed, because…
those who have “earned” their station typically feel no obligation to the less fortunate.
aristocrat: i was born into my role. i did not choose it. but my role is important to my society. someone must fill it.
meritocrat: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ON-7v4qnHP8
autist! i didn’t claim the imperial examination system was perfect. my point was it’s possible for a society to limit the striving and ambition and evil component of the ruling class. that’s all.
just relying on my “empirical observation”…i can’t see how it’s possible to cheat on any of the US entrance exams.
and the people who scored highest were the same people who were regarded as the smartest.
and for peepee, none of the kids who scored highest were among the “rich kids”. the rich kids in my hs were dumb.
but i admit that in the british sense of class i was probably the highest class in my hs even though i was not a rich kid.
i recalled correctly. but maybe it was fake news when i heard it and still is.
The Guanches are the mysterious natives of the Canary Islands. They were conquered by the Spaniards during the turn of the 15th century. Tall, blond and blue-eyed, the Guanches have long intrigued the anthropologists, for blond natives are rarity. According to the reliable Encyclopedia Britannica, the Guanches “are thought to have been of Cro-Magnon origin… and had a brown complexion, blue or gray eyes, and blondish hair.”
Indeed, the Guanches are deemed to be related to the Berbers of neighboring Morocco, who are, likewise, tall, blond and blue-eyed when unmixed with the Arab majority.
https://www.familytreedna.com/groups/guanches-canary-islands-dna/about/background
Thats very weird. It might be explained by norman invasions. AFAIK sicily was ruled by normans for a good while.
the list just keeps on growing.
here is the list of US unis by endowment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_colleges_and_universities_in_the_United_States_by_endowment
the university of texas president is a jew
the penn president is a jew.
UM president Mark Schlissel looks super jewy. wikipedia doesn’t always say.
northwestern’s president is a jew.
columbia’s president is a jew.
so 2 out of the top 11 are not jews.
even supposing that jews and half jews were 5% of the US population in the age group of university presidents, the probability of this occurring as a result of random sampling from the US population is…
(11 choose 2)*(.05^9)*(.95^2) = 9.6948 in ONE HUNDRED BILLION.
SAD!
ONE IN TEN BILLION ODDS prove…
there is NO affirmative action in college presidents.
hmmm…
Well of course jews are insanely successful. They have the IQ of Asians, the affirmative action of blacks & the white privelige of whites. The best of all worlds.
What do you mean, “the affirmative action of blacks”? Do you mean nepotism/networking?
jews are like captain planet…for privilege. “IQ,” “AA,” “Privilege,” “Chutzpah,” “Holocaust”
i.e. they take all the superpowers held by the various social groups and combine them into a divine force of reckoning.
reckoning for what?
the holocaust?
A 2013 study by Peristera Paschou et al. confirms that the Mediterranean Sea has acted as a strong barrier to gene flow through geographic isolation following initial settlements. Samples from (Northern) Italy, Tuscany, Sicily and Sardinia are closest to other Southern Europeans from Iberia, the Balkans and Greece, who are in turn closest to the Neolithic migrants that spread farming throughout Europe, represented here by the Cappadocian sample from Anatolia. But there hasn’t been any significant admixture from the Middle East or North Africa into Italy and the rest of Southern Europe since then.
https://www.brainpickings.org/2014/03/25/aldous-huxley-moksha-drugs/
https://www.colorlines.com/articles/fifty-years-later-black-girls-still-prefer-white-dolls
Theres no point talking to swanky. Hes a troll. Nobody could be that dumb. Dumb people don’t even try to use concepts like ‘white patriarchy’. So knowing the concept and using it in a serious conversation with people that weren’t molested in Room 401 is totally unheard of.
the hilarious thing is that half of the shit Phil whines about is a direct result of patriarchal ideology, which….apparently phil believes does not exist, even though phil believes ideologies of various kinds exist, just not this specific one….
…because he’s a fucking tool
so if 9 of the 11 uni presidents were white male gentiles that would be unlikely, just a million times more likely than the reality. the president of northwestern is a jewish woman.
penisson has explained why even with perfect equality of opportunity one should expect men to be the majority in positions of high rank.
because non-lesbian women are smart enough not to want to get to such positions.
Did you pass the the wests most relevant IQ test?
When you were become Winston, did you know who big brothers big brother was?
I can say it. AGAIN AND AGAIN. AND NOBODY WILL BELIEVE WHAT I SAY.
Now you know why girls find people that dont listen in class sexually attractive.
because humans haven’t been sheep long enough to find sheep sexually attractive.
^^^^
100% true fact
Sexuall appeal is 100% looks in non-pathological subjects.
The personality an girl likes depends on the individual girl. But an girl only opens up to relationships depending if you look good enough.
My view is, looks determine if you can start an relationship, personality determines how long it will last. Casual sex counts as very short relationships.
Guys that litsen in class dont have anything better to do in their life, probably becuase they are ugly or have too much of an pathological personality. An fit and goodlooking guy that listens in class will do just fine.
Wrong. Personality matters in short casual encounters too. Try approaching a woman and acting like Bill Gates. See what happens.
“non pathological subjects”. If Bill was good looking, he could have faked it long enough to get some cheap momo.
I think you can be really good looking and still turn off women. The main thing they won’t tolerate is appearing cowardly. You can kind of get away with being autist or not cool or untalented, even a bit fat. But if you show youre a coward, they really don’t like that.
I dont agree with this. As Long as other People dont hate the guy/the girl for being with the guy and is hot my rules follow most often.
I remember this russian girl was talking to a black and asian guy at this dating event I was in. Anyway long story short, me and the black guy didn’t back down because we both instinctively knew we’d look like a chump to the girls there if we did.
I kinda act like an chump but dont like it, so i just leave people.
I havent been tested nor excersized enough to be certain.
Truman show would have been a concept that Rod Serling really really liked.
Actually the idea was kind of done in 1 episode
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_World_of_Difference
Its quite a good episode. But they imply hes an actor that had a mental breakdown rather than him being of sound mind put against his will into a caricature.
I think the second possibility is far more interesting and the Truman Show proved it. That movie could have lasted another 2 hours and went into what happens after he escapes from his 1950s idyllic potomkin village and learns what the world is really like today.
It would be even funnier if it basically turned into ‘They Live’ and Truman figures out that 1 high IQ ethnic group is running a gigantic charade.
Or a bleaker version would be truman accepting that the potemkin village he had was no more a social construction than what was on the outside except, superior in every way and how he resents himself for knowing.
People in 1960s/50s movies and tv shows look a lot more masculine and ‘robust’ than today.
Maybe you guys are right that modern food is actually worse than living in a forest with a spear.
BUTTTTH BUTTTTH PHILO
THEN WE WOULD HAVE NO EXCUSE FOR WHY MAGIC PEOPLE ARE DUMMIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
magic people are smarter than ne asians as measured by support for freedom of speech.
white male americans are the world’s smartest people by the same criterion.
It also has to do with the amount of socialization you have with other kids and accross age groups during childhood and how much more the familly is extended. Ample excersize is also good. The ideal life would be that of the natives of hispanola, meaning food security but enough scarcity to never cause surpluss value to become (((profitable))).
“BUTTTTH BUTTTTH PHILO
THEN WE WOULD HAVE NO EXCUSE FOR WHY MAGIC PEOPLE ARE DUMMIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”
Blacks still eat worse than other goups, even if the other groups eat bad food.
I dont understand why people over-eat bad stuff, its pretty bad even in small quantities (bad in that it feels bad). I ate burger king once and i felt the fat on my neck and submental area as well as my stomach getting irritated and hungry after only 15 min. Not to mention how bad of an breath candy gives you.
Why cant we have more healthy and natural substitues like Japan. I eat butter steaked bread with much feta cheese, bananas and natural yoghurt to breakfast. Its sweet and salt, you can also mix them to get an amazing taste, but it doesnt make me feel like shit. Much better than cake and other garbage.
“The modus operandi for the departure from life is usually a pine box of such and such dimensions, and this is the ultimate in reality. But there are other ways for a man to exit from life. Take the case of Arthur Curtis, age thirty-six. His departure was along a highway with an exit sign that reads, ‘This Way To Escape.’ Arthur Curtis, en route to the Twilight Zone”
Very good writing by rod.
who was a jew. what fraction of the episodes did he write himself? it wasn’t 100% was it?
Around 50%
this scene from The Cincinnati Kid reminds me of james lee’s, plomin’s, and shoe’s recent papers.
mugabe wins. in fact, mugabe’s prediction wasn’t optimistic enough. mugabe thought the additive and environment independent effect of genes would be much greater, just much smaller than what HBDers claim believing twin studies.
the only out the HBDers have is…
1. rare alleles account for the missing heritability.
2. these rare alleles are almost uniformly negative in effect.
3. someone with many more rare alleles is much dumber on average.
james lee points out that the individual effect of rare alleles is impossible to assess because they are rare…that is, it would require more people than there are to assess the effect…unless the effect is profound, like retardation.
Or there could be rare variants that make some much smarter on average. Indeed with three billion base pairs, there could be rare variants that increase IQ by 30 points. And no, such a variant would not necessarily have become common because:
1) it may be accompanied by negative effects like over-sized brains that reduce attractiveness, require more calories or make child birth risky
2) it may also cause mental illness or neurological disease
3) may have appeared after selection for intelligence relaxed
yes peepee,
BUT THEN IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO PREDICT IQ FROM GENOTYPE ANY BETTER THAN THE CURRENT 10%.
The question’s not whether we’ll be able to predict IQ from DNA, the question is whether Jensen was right. He never predicted DNA IQ tests afaik.
They will eventually crack it and figure it out. But it will be a long process. You have to remember this type of research is basically banned in the West because of certain ‘moral obligations’.
So the chinese are the best shot. When you compare what we know about genes to even 10 years ago, a lot has changed.
they’ll never crack the problem of the missing heritability if it wasn’t there in the first place.
rr and i agree. it was never there. twin studies are garbage.
the one yuge environmental effect HBDers never take into account is the environment from conception to birth, the womb.
Studies comparing DZ vs MZ twins together consider the womb since both types of twins share the same womb. Of course these studies rely on the equal environment assumption.
so there was this thing in the US called “the polack joke”. poles were once a “white ethnic”.
the point is that swank’s claims for the roman empire are disproven by the “empirical experience” of the last 100 years in the US.
that is, no one cares about poles, irish, germans, whatever european ethnie…
except the italians. and even then they don’t care much.
but all non-european americans are just as distinct as they were 100 years ago…
except the japs. they’re honorary whites.
Small penis.
You could even argue a conjecture that if the jews didn’t keep talking so much about racism and race issues, people would see minorities as less distinctive than they do now. Thats the funny angle.
i admit. i never considered that the constant din about race was more than a symptom of a multiracial society.
but now that you say it, it’s obvious.
the jews have an interest in promoting racial tension.
That contradicts that they are doing the talks for mass immigration. As ive said earlier, its about making Whites conservative enough to give no party power and from that position cerate corrupt corporatism.
The same thing happened in many African nations that Gould gain power such as Nigeria and Ethiopia, South Africa and Zaire. India might also be an example, many indians Only worry about pakis and the wealth of the upper class, givning no shits about the nature, pollution or the majority population. Thus the ”make in India” initiative. Even though india isnt part of Pakistan, its still dividera an conquer.
When people argue against HBD what they really are arguing against is evolution. Because basically youre saying evolution stopped the day when enough homo sapiens existed to procreate and survive the environment. And youre not giving a reason why it stopped.
Most of the above also believe in animal husbandry and mendelian genetics or that a pitbull is not the exact same thing as a yorkshire terrier.
Actually i suspect if you surveyred geneticists that were educated in ‘evil morality’ pre the 1960s like Watson and Crick and asked them based on everything thats happened since, do you think intelligence is heritable, they would probably be more certain, not less.
Hoping Dr Shu is going to keep failing to get the exact mechanism is the wrong bet.
the single most feared final solution to the HBD question BY THE ELITE is…
1. races differ
2. individuals within races do not differ.
Yes, I’ve blogged about that possibility. If it were true it would mean not even eugenics could eliminate racial IQ gaps. It’s possible it could be true because punctuated equilibrium theory predicts major genetic changes happen in sudden bursts, and the emergence of a new race could be such a genetic burst. And when populations form new races by entering new environments, they might quickly reach a selection limit for whatever traits are useful in that environment, allowing for limited within race heritability.
Mug of Pee I would like you to go on record saying how much of the 1 standard deviation black-white IQ gap in the U.S. is genetic.
Lion & Richard Lynn are both on record saying it’s 100%.
And please don’t evade the issue by saying the question is meaningless because of reaction norms or some other technical issue.
Just imagine both American blacks and whites were randomly scattered around the world and raised in all environments, how big would the racial IQ gap between them be in SD units?
And note, that if both populations were scattered around the world, the white SD (and the black SD) would be larger than 15 points, which is why I asked the question in (white) SD units, not IQ points.
Meh, being black I like to think I differ from the general black pop. Though maybe that’s still the case, the proportion of personality facets could still remain. Relatively speaking, I could still be an expression of the black race as a whole.
Ive long suspected the biggest critics of Galtonian determinism are the most fervent believers of it. Its sounds ridiculous, but in an ironic plot twist, they are demonstrating certain high IQ traits by playing dumb and morally chastising anyone that asks questions.
This gets in the area of how a society creates knowledge. If you get to a point where certain interest groups gum up the knowledge production belt or even reverse knowledge, its not always because people are dumb or there are not enough people reading the Economist. Its a very viable tribal strategy to stop producition of knowledge or the opposite make propaganda.
This is why I think Italy eventually went into decline. Dark triad type traits propagated and the nerdy autist ones concerned about ‘the truth’ got shown the door. This will also happen to the West in time. We see it already.
But this wouldn’t explain chinas decline. Chinese people get a lot of heat about not being creative/being robotic etc …. but you wouldn’t really call them cunning or manipulative or malevolent.
In fact most asian immigrants side with white nationalist types if anything in the identity pokemon card scheme.
Rushton’s theory for the rise & fall of civilization is K genotypes build the civilization, but once it’s built, natural selection pressures relax and r genotypes take over. This causes the civilization to crash, which then increases selection for K genotypes who then rebuild civilization & the cycle repeats.
He could be right. But Eygpt never really came back. But maybe Eygpt had more to do with the land being more fertile in the mid east back then compared to later centuries.
Egypt was always weaker than mesopotamia. They just had morse peace ghansk to geography separations them and infighting within the Middle East.
Rushton theory don’t take into account the presence of antagonistic elements within social organism…
Civilizations and empires are basically big enterprises managed by parasitic elites which used them to accumulate endless power.
If you wanted to design the optimum approach to creating knowledge Im hesitant to say free speech would actually result in that.
As we know, bigger knowledge leaps were made in Victorian era Europe than the last 40 or so years.
But free speech as a civil right is worth it.
People can be totally brainwashed and believe in absurdity like Newton and Bill Gates and still be logical, even genius, on certain problems and issues.
HBDers live in flatland. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatland
there’s a third and a fourth dimension they’re 100% unaware of.
third dimension = GxE. should be obvious but isn’t to HBDers.
fourth dimension = national character is not predictable from the (supposed) innate character of a nation’s individual members.
national character is not effected by individual character,
but it is affected by it,
just as the national character affects,
but does not effect,
the character of the individual members of the nation.
conclusion:
an ethnically homogeneous polity is the best polity. it is best in the sense that its members are most likely to achieve their potential…in all other polities, members are less likely to achieve their potential.
because GxE.
I don’t think HBD is totally genetic. Im more like Peter Frost. I think his explanation for it ‘gene-culture co evolution’ makes the most sense. I.e. its clear north east asians like the chinese/koreans are very different to mongols or Kryghstanis and these again to Japs.
Jared Diamonds explanation makes a lot of sense i.e. the environment matters most long term. But youre talking about such long time horizons that its quite meaningless. In the here and now, genes are the biggest thing that will effect outcomes in relation to a lot of social outcomes. short of some sort of pharmaceutical solution that would be the equivalent of steroids for the brain and radical hormonal treatments.
Does anyone know what happened to Robert Lindsay’s blog? I haven’t been reading him as much recently but it seems his blog his may have been taken down…