[update dec 26, 2016: an earlier version of this article estimated the monkey men and cavemen to have an average IQ of 40 & 62 respectively. I have since changed these to 55 and 64 respectively]
In the past I’ve blogged about how my fascination with HBD started after I saw the movie Quest for Fire at age five (I’m now in my thirties) because it was the first time I had a sense of different levels of human evolution, some more advanced than others, co-existing and competing in a struggle for survival. The film uses not a word of English, so I strongly recommend it to all my readers, especially my foreign readers. A fictional language was created for the characters and as you watch the film, you slowly pick up words, and the number of words you can learn might serve as a measure of fluid verbal IQ (as opposed to the crystalized verbal IQ measured by standard vocabulary tests).
For a film over three decades old, it remains remarkably anthropologically accurate today, as it’s now widely accepted that 80,000 years ago, several species of human did indeed co-exist.
The film shows three major levels of human evolution struggling for survival: The primitive monkey men, the cavemen, and the advanced modern humans. .
The monkey men IQ 55
If you believe IQ is a scientifically valid concept, then the monkey men probably have an average IQ of 55, both phenotypically and genetically. Because they were living in the wild and the natural habitat their ancestors spent thousands of years adapting to, I believe most hominins living 80.000 years ago had more or less reached their genetic potential. The monkey men were smart enough to understand the value of fire and attack their neighboring cavemen with clubs in an attempt to steal it, but not smart enough to speak, create spears or wear clothing.
The cavemen IQ 64
The cavemen in this film probably had an average IQ of 64. High enough to wear very crude fur coats, fight with spears, and to speak in a language of a few hundred words. They live in terror of being attacked by the monkey men who they call “wogaboo”. They are smart enough use fire to cook and scare away wolves, and they are smart enough to keep the fire alive for a long period of time, but they are not smart enough to make it.
The modern humans IQ 85
The modern humans probably have an average IQ 85. They appear to be fully modern black African type people who speak in a complex language, use throwing spears, build sturdy huts, make beautiful ceramic containers, color themselves grey, wear masks, make fire, and are even smart enough to build their village behind a pond of quicksand that traps intruders from other tribes. Unlike other tribes, they are evolved enough to have a sense of humor and are constantly laughing at the inferior cavemen.
I doubt any population living 80,000 years ago had the genetic potential to have an average IQ above 70, so the high intelligence of this tribe was perhaps the only unrealistic thing about this movie. Or perhaps I’m overestimating their IQs.
The film’s impact on my life
After seeing this film as a child, I remembered wishing I had lived 80,000 years ago. Life was so exciting when he had three different levels of human evolution coexisting in a Darwinian struggle for survival. So imagine my excitement when scholar J.P. Rushton proposed his shocking theory that Orientals were more genetically advanced than whites who were more advanced than blacks. While the rest of the World was disgusted that Rushton could promote such horrific “pseudoscience”, I was secretly fascinated, because It was almost as if I had willed my favorite movie into life, except instead of black Africans being the most evolved humans, as they were 80,000 years ago, Rushton was arguing that they were now at the bottom of the new tri-level hierarchy.
A beautiful love story
Aside from the anthropological value of this film, it’s one of the most romantic movies I have ever seen. At the heart of the film is a deeply moving love story about a caveman who falls in love with a modern human woman.
Even though they speak completely different languages and arguably belong to different species, they forge an intimate bond, as she slowly teaches him how to be human. Through her tutoring he learns what humour is and laughs for the first time in his life, and while he and his tribe know only how to have doggie style sex, she teaches him how to make love. This films takes you back 80,000 years in time, and allows you to see the World, through the innocent eyes of the first humans, and all the awe and mystery of the endlessly uncharted landscape.
Pumpkin Person 
So the idea would be that much like how people try to pass on their genes via sex via survival of the fittest, that also applies to race and genetic similarity in general?
I suppose that’s an intuitive theory but is there any research on the matter?
Ps PP you seem to be getting agitated at critical of you commenters lately. Understandable. I can see you are worried about the election of trump and darwin’s prediction regarding the “civilized races exterminating the savage races”. I think approaching HBD from a paternalistic view of the lower IQ people is better than an eugenic approach. That is why HBD opponents prefer this blog, you don’t disgust them at much. That is at least my opinion anyway.
Will, documented in my refutation of JayMan.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/05/16/ethnic-genetic-interests-and-group-selection-does-exist-a-reply-to-jayman-2/
And I’m getting into it with him over at Unz as well.
http://www.unz.com/jman/clannishness-the-series-how-it-happened/#comment-1700199
I KNOW he denies EGIs because he’s mixed with a white wife and mixed children. As PP has said in the past, this shows his EGIs.
“I KNOW he denies EGIs because he’s mixed with a white wife and mixed children. As PP has said in the past, this shows his EGIs.”
Yes, it’s ironic.
But on the flip side, he’s a really light skinned Black guy from what I’ve seen. He might even be more White than Black, so EGIs don’t conflict with the notion of him having a White wife.
and RR…see my comment below.
I’m just speculating that EGIs might not always translate to “reproducing with a similar genotyped partner and passing off more of your genes via what is shared with your partner” BECAUSE the offspring would be less healthy/more likely to die than a hybrid.
There are many commenters on this site. It’s really Mugabe and that is it.
I’m looking forward to the day where genetic engineered humans are customized like any commodity. How many wealthy people would want to adopt a high IQ brain with a black shell?
No Mug of Pee has used many names but he only uses one name at a time. If you think most of the people here are Mug of Pee, your social brain is impaired. Mug of Pee has a very distinctive writing style
Yes, most of the commenters here are variations of Mugaboo, including that Canadian lady.
If I’m wrong, it doesn’t matter anyway. People can argue both sides of an issue. Mugaboo hates Anglo proles, but sometimes he writes how wonderful America is.
Huh?
If I’m wrong, it doesn’t matter anyway.
You are wrong, and it does matter.
People can argue both sides of an issue.
Only if they want to look silly
So what? I still think there are many Mugaboos on your blog.
And the Philosopher is basically another reincarnation of Videla/Mugaboo. He was banned from Lion’s blog, but somehow found a way to post there again!
And the Philosopher is basically another reincarnation of Videla/Mugaboo
No he’s not. You’re confused. I’m putting you in moderation until you stop acting crazy.
Why am I acting crazy? I just say most of the commenters on your blog are Videla & Co.
To paraphrase Chris Langan, insane people don’t know they’re insane; and therein lies their insanity.
Please drop the nonsense or I’ll put you in moderation.
I need not to post on your blog anymore. After all, my agenda here was always shitting on the Anglos, especially White Americans and their Jewish masters, and Videla & Co was happy to join in the fun. And you being a Canadian helps…
At first I thought Pumpkin was a demented split personality type guy with an alter ego like Norman Bates, as both are equally ‘innocent’ for better word. But it’s not him.
Now I’m beginning to think Robert is the demented one as you suggest and has put an incredible amount of effort into cultivating our Dildo friend persona – including debating with himself.
But that doesn’t quite add up either.
This Deal with It! may well be a sockpuppet, but not of Robert or Pumpkin who would have to be the biggest losers of all time to go to this much effort, although maybe I’m being charitable
I find the transitions from 14 year old schoolgirl to fairly lucid writing to be jarring.
Nice little brainteaser. Kind of like Sherlock Holmes.
Or maybe it really is a person.
TOODLE DOO DOO TOODLE DOO DOO
Videla be crazy, but he ain’t cray cray
I think JS just reached +1000 Alex Jones/godlikeproductions.com level paranoia.
The best evidence is best friends and spouses are most alike on the most heritable traits. That suggests we evolved to form alliances with those who share our genes
I see. That’s very anecdotally observable.
So I suppose if you reproduce with someone who shares your genes at higher rates one would see that the offspring has a higher proportion of your genes, passing them on at higher rates. A clone would be a near perfect proxy for this.
On the flip-side, reproducing with someone closely related to you could cause the issue of genetic defects if the genes are recessive. It also means that if you are not actively reproducing with someone genetically different from you, that they are rapidly reproducing with their own genetic similars, passing on their genes at high rates too.
so…
benefits of hybrid vigor < having a higher proportion of one's genes, through the shared genes with partners, passed onto offspring (?)
To Willie,
“so…
benefits of hybrid vigor < having a higher proportion of one's genes, through the shared genes with partners, passed onto offspring (?)"
This seems to mention such regarding 3rd cousin marriage.
http://io9.gizmodo.com/5863666/why-inbreeding-really-isnt-as-bad-as-you-think-it-is
Thanks Phil.
I’d also be interested to see how much that changes with technological advancement (less Darwinian fitness selection).
Even inbred offspring aren’t going to die in infancy at higher rates than Hybrid offspring. Therefore, it is almost certain passing on a higher proportion of genes via what is shared with your partner is more beneficial than gaining hybrid vigor fitness benefits.
I think that inequality statement could be wrong in certain times and places, like South Carolina swamps in slaving days. In a tough climate to survive (malaria, etc.) hybrid vigor is certainly required. There is the extra dynamic that Blacks have some natural immunity to malaria. In a place like that the optimum may have been 3/4 Black and 1/4 Caucasian or something like that. That would’ve been the “goal”. Maybe.
To Willie,
Of course the point on which form of breeding would require context.
However, your blacks and Malaria example needs some context.
1. Blacks’ resistance to Malaria, rather than immunity, is based on SCA. This isn;t necessarily because they are “black” but that many blacks lived in high malaria environments which triggered selection for SCA. Depending on the context, it could be beneficial or detrimental.
Still, that was also wrapped around their other adaptations to swampy/tropical climates hence why they were valued more than Irish slaves for certain areas like the Caribbeans.
I brought that up to jayman but he says it had to do with “population stratification”.
That suggests we evolved to form alliances with those who share our genes
Even on physical traits like height, weight?
Even on traits like ear lobe length
https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS8eWeesrBg2I9KIh5zfyLmOoSFBEclqVhXoGUohSnsocCHohOIKA
Are you 15? You’re always trying to wind me up. When I react, you call me hysterical. That’s your game.
DEAL WITH IT
I’ve made a pledge not to get into such mud slinging, but I guess muh impulse control is too low.
He’s hypocritical to a certain degree.
The ‘evolutionary right wingers’/’racialists’/whatever you want to call them are almost as sensitive and nearly as easily “triggered” as SJWs.
Just call him “Black” and observe.
He may not know it, but he’s a snowflake too.
I’m sure he’ll call me a “cuck” or something in response to this. Lol.
I apologize for my remark. I may have been too broad.
It is obviously true in the case of philosopher, however.
You are discussing the path of evolution yet your grasp and sense of survival is akin to an autistic Mormon volunteer in Haiti.
Cuck.
PS Evolution has more in common with a meteorological phenomenon, than a Lagrangian log flume or Cobb Douglas Optimisation – Survival & Repro=EugenicEnv f{benefit vigour^a, benefit stasis^b).
FACT.
I’m sure he’s part black. He’s an Afrikaner.
Mugabe and Philosopher both want to return to the good old days…
Putting negroes in schools decreases educational achievement of whites, hispanics, and asians.
It increases illegal drug sales, gun sales, and gangsta rap album sales.
When was the last time Oprah pointed out Africa was poor because blacks were R selected IQ 70 retards?
WHEN?!
Randall McOprah has a book called ‘Race, Evolution, Behaviour and Talk Show Hosting’ which specifically links America’s decline in productivity, drug abuse increase, gangsta rap sales and promotion of teenage sex and violence with desegregation.
You know he got for that?
Crickets. Even the jews wouldn’t touch him to promote him as the smartest psychologist in America because he’s black.
HE GOT 0 OSCARS!!!!
If a white man wrote a book like that Pumpkin would be blogging about it.
Look, let’s be serious.
I think the biggest problem in African Magic Negro communities has got to be the lack of Oscars.
We can talk till we are blue in the face about all the single mothers, criminals, wanton violence, drugs, low IQs, low impulse control, psychopathy, corruption, poor financial knowledge, tribalism, unprotected sex, belief in voodoo, rac-schism against whites, poor credit, lack of work ethic, Islam, butch anti academic culture, HIV, low empathy, schizo tendencies, glorification of rappers, math retardation, hygiene problems, casual murder, psychopathy and disregard for safety of children all we want.
But everyone knows they are SIDE ISSUES.
The real issues are lack of Oscars, no promotion of blacks in the media for spelling their name properly and the fact the president is a neo nazi from Honolulu.
Why do blacks have to suit whites in America? Why can’t America plant a tropical rainforest everywhere and we can go back to smashing people in the face?
Blacks only fail because the rules are against them.
The rules should be the rules of the jungle.
Whites always say they’re for the environment – how many jungles have they made?
None.
philosophe isn’t a boer. he’s a bore.
willie obviously has no willie.
From the man that willingly wasted time with chemistry and trained to be an actuary. Yeoowsa that hurts.
i willingly wasted time at NEITHER fucktard.
my time was proved wasted by DISCRIMINATION.
the causes of which are OBSCURE…even to a psychiatrist.
deal has been brainwashed by the corporate dems.
all of the identities deserve equality of opportunity…obviously.
so just say it. stop naming names. it’s the trees for the forest.
the herd is bewildered again!
Is that why I staunchly supported Bernie Sanders?
bernie was strangely pro-gun…
maybe he wasn’t too fond of injuns either.
i changed from I to D just so i could vote for that old jew.
There is not much to say here beyond my criticism of the “taxonomy” here, though I like your commentary on IQ estimates.
“Monkey Man”?- If we are going to be a tad more anthropological the hominid in this film would’ve either been H. Habilis by appearance or H. Erectus by it’s feat of Fire.
Yet it’s implied that they merely comprehended rather than create it de novo so they could be Habilis that merely mimicked it but I’m unsure how long that species lived, Erectus making more sense.
Another thing to consider is that the evidence points to H. Erectus being the ones to actually expand OOA first, so I’ll just say this is a “hairy Erectus” for sake of aesthetics being the only real argument for Habilis I’ve considered.
Caveman- Technically Neanderthals to be specific, as this taking place 80,000 predates Cromagnon, who BTW had smaller faces while this guys would’ve been more long face characteristic of them. By feats though cooking seems debatable though evidence exists.
http://www.archaeology.org/news/3220-150420-neanderthal-cooking-herbs
“Black Africans”- The Idea of the people arriving into Europe looking like “modern Black Africans” has been a common mininterpretation of OOA and even by looking at available images of these people of the “Ulam Tribe” they don’t even look it closer detail, probably closer to some Oceanic population.
The idea has been exemplified through the Grimaldi skull which failed through
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grimaldi_Man#Grimaldi_man_as_.22negroid.22
The eventual conclusion being also relevant here.
http://racialreality.blogspot.com/2011/02/cro-magnons-were-caucasoid-not-negroid.html
Also, while you point towards genetic advancement through when Asians broke off from other Human groups as well as IQ, in actual practice that doesn’t hold up.
Europeans, by phenotype, could be argued to be more diverged by the narrowness of their faces if we are to go by your logic of “selected dna” which I’ve already touched.
https://pumpkinperson.com/2016/12/05/the-black-white-iq-gap/comment-page-1/#comment-41458
Plus in actual practice (history) has that really been the case? I think data from Charles Murray choose a clear inventive advantage over Asians as well as in the basic analysis of “Who conquered who”.
If we are actually going to rank “superiority”, practice speaks louder than what seems to have been analysis of genetic potential.
“Monkey Man”?- If we are going to be a tad more anthropological the hominid in this film would’ve either been H. Habilis by appearance or H. Erectus by it’s feat of Fire.
I avoided being too precise because the film makers were a bit confused, at least by today’s standards. The monkey men were actually supposed to be Neanderthals, who back in the early 1980s were thought to be ape-like brutes. But with what we know today, it indeed makes much more sense to consider them H. erectus.
Yet it’s implied that they merely comprehended rather than create it de novo so they could be Habilis that merely mimicked it but I’m unsure how long that species lived, Erectus making more sense.
I seriously doubt H. erectus knew how to create fire. They just knew how to exploit it.
“Black Africans”- The Idea of the people arriving into Europe looking like “modern Black Africans” has been a common mininterpretation of OOA and even by looking at available images of these people of the “Ulam Tribe” they don’t even look it closer detail, probably closer to some Oceanic population.
The film never states where the events take place, although the shooting location for the Caveman homeland was Northern Ontario, Canada, and the shooting location of where the modern human tribe lived was Kenya.
But in the movie the two locations were supposed to be close enough that a few of the cavemen walked from their homeland to the village of the modern humans
The modern humans were played by whoever they could find in Kenya. Mostly black East Africans I think, and some East Indians. When the French director was trying to make fire, a Maasai walked by laughing and showed him the correct way. Because he had this skill, the Massai was hired to play one of the modern humans on the spot.
“I avoided being too precise because the film makers were a bit confused, at least by today’s standards. The monkey men were actually supposed to be Neanderthals, who back in the early 1980s were thought to be ape-like brutes. But with what we know today, it indeed makes much more sense to consider them H. erectus.”
Actually I’ve looked at the Wiki page for the movie, it said that rather the cave people were neanderthals. Plus it was common knowledge at that point that it was by H. Erectus that we lost all of that Body hair, so no way could they’ve been accurate Neanderthals.
It also says on the wikipage that Erectus was the basis for the ape creatures
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quest_for_Fire_(film)#Scientific_accuracy
“I seriously doubt H. erectus knew how to create fire. They just knew how to exploit it.”
http://www.history.com/news/human-ancestors-tamed-fire-earlier-than-thought
Here it suggest that evidence exist for them to use fire.
“The film never states where the events take place, although the shooting location for the Caveman homeland was Northern Ontario, Canada, and the shooting location of where the modern human tribe lived was Kenya.”
The Wikipage said it took place in Paleolithic Europe.
“But in the movie the two locations were supposed to be close enough that a few of the cavemen walked from their homeland to the village of the modern humans
The modern humans were played by whoever they could find in Kenya. Mostly black East Africans I think, and some East Indians. When the French director was trying to make fire, a Maasai walked by laughing and showed him the correct way. Because he had this skill, the Massai was hired to play one of the modern humans on the spot.”
In that case then, technically, if any negroid population were to be used then Nilosaharans would’ve been the best choice.
Really it’s a toss up on how you could portray them in this context.
Actually I’ve looked at the Wiki page for the movie, it said that rather the cave people were neanderthals. Plus it was common knowledge at that point that it was by H. Erectus that we lost all of that Body hair, so no way could they’ve been accurate Neanderthals.
Well according to the featurette in the film’s DVD extras, the Wogaboo were Neanderthals, so perhaps Wikipedia is doing some revisionist history.
“Well according to the featurette in the film’s DVD extras, the Wogaboo were Neanderthals, so perhaps Wikipedia is doing some revisionist history.”
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082484/trivia
that seems consistent with this trivia here. The Wiki info must have been talking about the commentary made in this book.
https://books.google.com/books?id=65QdBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA123&lpg=PA123&dq=Quest+for+fire+notes+hominids&source=bl&ots=3EOnxLWttR&sig=Pp6zuiwC10Q6zx3qqmsZIRKO_rc&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiF59y85Y3RAhVFylQKHZZiACwQ6AEISTAL#v=onepage&q=Quest%20for%20fire%20notes%20hominids&f=false
I’m surprised on how close my classification was to the commentator’s own, the Wagabou being Erectus, the Kzamm being neanderthals, etc.
Basically the Kzamm were a type of Hybrid between the Wagabou and the Ulam, and the Ulam and Ivaka being Anatomically modern Humans.
Randall McOprah’s R/K/Oscars theory of human selection should have won a nobel.
Instead they gave it to some crazy Zionist jew guy who literally kept repeating his name in his book ‘Den Senor: Off the Record’ and then bragged in his acceptance speech that he was going to degrade all the values of every single prize, honor and award of white people by bribing conferrors to award them for muck and insanity.
So he said he’s going to blackmail and bribe people for Oscars, pulitzers, rhodes scholarships, knighthoods, Medal Of Honors, MTV awards and Aladdin Lamps and be the most awarded person of all time.
Blacks must stop him taking all the Oscars.
By the way, I have to come clean and say:
I have never won an oscar. Not even for a technical thing like lighting, filmography or hairdressing.
Dildos is against school integration but for Oscar segregation.
How many Oscars have philosophers won? 0
How many Oscars have Dildos won?
At least 10 last year alone.
not funny. Just lame and stupid.
PP, you should change your attitudes toward censorship. I’m not saying that you should allow complete free speech but do like Robert Lindsay:
-Make the speech rules clear
-Warn people they’re gonna be censored
-Let people know once someone is censored so that nobody wonders why this person is not answering.
-Stop pretending freedom of speech is total on your blog
I haven’t censored any of your comments in the last several days.
Come on…
When comments are eternally awaiting moderation, I call it censorship.
It’s been several days since any of your comments have been held in moderation for more than a few hours (which usually means they’ll stay there).
But you point about me not explaining the censorship/moderation process is a valid one. I will try to be more like Robert Lindsay in providing more clarity.
Im drunk down totally uninhibited
I just wanna cry. Why? Because no one respects me. You guys just make fun of me.
All of your comments here revolve around drawing attention to yourself (though you’ve had a few insightful things to say). I think your attention-seeking tendencies are even worse than mine (which makes sense, since you’re a woman).
Irl in toldbim narcissist and self absorbed and that’s true but I have low self esteem at the same time especially regarding my intelligrncr
And you never told me your LSAT.
171
still not funny.
Your sister is someone’s sperm trashcan you asshole. Fuck you I’m morla.
at least i can type after i’ve drunk a fifth of liquor.
i guess it’s true. you people can’t handle the firewater.
Yagetbomb
[photo redacted by PP, Dec 23, 2016]
This comment thread has turned into a car crash. Hahaha.
Philosopher thinks the dumb bimbo thing is real. It’s not I just can’t control it when I turn it on. Can’t put the toothpaste back into the tube I’m drunk woweeeee
it won’t be the last time.
Mugabe us restarted white trash millet sporting prole and JS is a dumbass and philosopher is adexisg asshole
project much?
Afrosapiena snd racerealist and yondwanaman are smart and mature and respectable and nice and it’s shows us that black people are better than whites like the white hitches who appropriate indigenous cultures just search squaw on Google dull of white bitches dressed up as indigenous women because they think it’s cute
white hitches who appropriate indigenous cultures…
i know someone like that.
RaceRealist is white though. And we don’t know for sure if Afrosapiens is really black (I’ve provided my proof).
More of this noble magic negro crap.
Q What’s the deepest fear of a black man?
A Being sent back to Africa.
RaceRealist is white though. And we don’t know for sure if Afrosapiens is really black (I’ve provided my proof).
What proof ? Can I see it ?
that guy cat person posted is full of it.
neanderthal and ape skulls do NOT look alike. not even close.
gorilla:
chimp:
Still, much more simian than homo sapien
what the fuck?
NO!
the MOST obvious…
1. neanderthals have a FUCKING HUGE nose! the great apes: chimps, gorrilas, and orangs don’t have noses.
2. they don’t have FUCKING HUGE jaw muscles.
it’s fucking obvious…
the neanderthals were just fucked up humans.
ron perlman is recognizable as one of the cavemen, and he looks like a caveman in real life too.
The sunken eyes, the narrow angular forehead, low vaulted as well, topped with a long face.
BTW, the cavemen would be specifical neanderthals, as typical cavemen like cromagnons had very different faces that were rounder and smaller.
Change your user name Mug of Pee!
or what?
Funny thing is that black people have more indigenous blood than whites but these white bitches think it’s so cute to play dress up with indigenous cultures after their white trash ancestors exterminated indigenous people.
politics is complicated.
Recommend me a good book pls
peepee won’t post it.
Interesting. I was thinking a novel.
My ug major was philosophy btw.
Deal,
This video is this neuroscientist’s book, Why Diets Make us Fat.
Oprah would do good to read this book, and maybe put it on her book list to get it more publicity. But that’d conflict with her Weight Watchers garbage and we can’t have that now, can we…..
Weight watchers isn’t a diet fool. You can have unlimited produce.
>Arthur Koestler
Don’t recommend The Thirteenth Tribe…
Thanks RR and Mugabe.
I have The Razor’s Edge lying around but never got around to it. I’ll read it first.
Mugabe is in a capitalist mood today? Lol.
I’m not really a fan of novels or fiction. I like non-fiction science books. Mostly biology and psychology. I think it’s a waste of time to read anything else.
you shouldn’t have said that. because now i can disprove it.
Q1. what is the difference between analytic/anglo-american/oxford philosophy and autism?
Q2. why should all departments of academic philosophy be closed?
Q3. what group of philosophy dons was contemporary anal-ytic philosophastering a reaction against?
Q4. name the three prominent german philosophers who were inspired most by kant?
Q5. summarize the Critique of Pure Reason in one sentence.
Q6. who were the schoolmen?
Q7. why is a college course in ethics a contradiction in terms?
Q8. state godel’s incompleteness theorem.
tick, tick, tick,…
“Weight watchers isn’t a diet fool. You can have unlimited produce.”
Buddy, it’s a ‘diet system’. They preach muh CICO all the while not taking time to look at the hormonal theory of obesity. Though, it is too complicated for some people to wrap their heads around the fact that we don’t have conscious control over our eating and that hormones drive our hunger and when we get sated. It’s too complicated for people to understand that the human body regulates body fat and it’s NOT regulated by how many kcals you intake. Tell me, does it make sense for body fat to be the ONLY thing not regulated by the body?
People assume that exercise is the key to weight loss. The ‘eat less and move more’ paradigm. But exercise makes us hungrier. Exercise makes us eat more. I used to do HIIT training, 10 intervals, sprinting for 30 seconds then walking for 1 minute, 10 mph and 3 mph respectively, rinse and repeat ten times. I was ravenous when I got home. Exercise makes us eat more, it’s not a ‘key’ for weight loss.
And don’t get me started on the insulin-spiking carbohydrates.
http://nymag.com/news/sports/38001/
I only studied analytical philosophy. Epistemology, Metaphysics, Philosophy of Mind, etc. Did you know the movie Ex Machina referenced the Mary’s room experiment by Frank Jackson? Philosophy of Mind is cool. Searle is a bit overrated though.
RR I know something about the hormonal theory of obesity. I read a book by Dr. Jason Fung. You should read it.
“I read a book by Dr. Jason Fung. You should read it.”
Of course I read that book. I love Fung. Have you read Why We Get Fat and What To Do About it and Good Calories Bad Calories by Gary Taubes along with Rethinking Thin by Gina Kolata and finally Secrets From the Eating Lab by Tracy Mann? All of these books changed my mind on obesity and weight gain/loss. I bought Fung’s new book the day it came out in October.
ALL the evidence points in ONE direction regarding diet. if cavemen ate it, it can’t make you fat.
I only studied analytical philosophy. Epistemology, Metaphysics, Philosophy of Mind, etc. Did you know the movie Ex Machina referenced the Mary’s room experiment by Frank Jackson?
so basically you know nothing about philosophy. sad.
Philosophy of Mind is cool. Searle is a bit overrated though.
all anal-ytic philosophasters are morons. searle is pathetic. not one of them has the cognitive ability of a 13 year old who’s read the introduction to his dictionary.
Philosophy Talk is tiresome. ken and john are morons.
what is called “the philosophy of mind” is just a bunch of autistic children who can’t understand heidegger or hegel, let alone think for themselves.
some of these retards have said such things as the solution to the ghost in the machine “problem” is that consciousness is an illusion.
thankfully chomsky gets it. ultimately all this “philosophy of mind” bs is due to an unknown known. these autists have never interrogated the concept of “object”. in the end consciousness isn’t an illusion, but the object is.
“ALL the evidence points in ONE direction regarding diet. if cavemen ate it, it can’t make you fat.”
Natural foods release make your body release hormones to make you sated. Processed garbage (where they take out fiber and other essential nutrients doesn’t send your brain these same signals. Hormones like insulin directly shuttle fat into the adipocyte and prevent fat from being lost, even when in a caloric deficit. But people will rip your head off (or try to) if you say that hormones dictate fat gain and hunger and that willpower and self-control have nothing to do with obesity since we are driven by our hormones and our brain doesn’t know the difference between obese and nonobese.
The key is that among the many things regulated in this homeostatic system—along with blood pressure and blood sugar, body temperature, respiration, etc.—is the amount of fat we carry. From this biological or homeostatic perspective, lean people are not those who have the willpower to exercise more and eat less. They are people whose bodies are programmed to send the calories they consume to the muscles to be burned rather than to the fat tissue to be stored—the Lance Armstrongs of the world. The rest of us tend to go the other way, shunting off calories to fat tissue, where they accumulate to excess. This shunting of calories toward fat cells to be stored or toward the muscles to be burned is a phenomenon known as fuel partitioning.
http://nymag.com/news/sports/38001/index4.html
taubes was the guy i first heard question whether exercise makes slim, but…
run 10 miles a day…you’ll lose weight…and get shin splints.
The average person doesn’t have the time to run ten hours per day and any increase in physical activity will lead to an increase in caloric intake causing more fat gain.
I love Taubes’s theory. Makes a ton of sense if you know basic physiology and metabolism.
In Québec, 1st nations get to run bookshops and pass as French:
Anglo Canuck Proles want to keep you guys in the reservations.
In America, natives get take part in most the prole of businesses: Casinos
Yeah, keep calling me a dumbass again!
And these 2 ladies run the same bookstore in French Canada:
Now this ugly fecal hole in NYC is owned by Jews, who treat their workers like crap:
If the store looks like crap, why would the owners respect their workers!
the United States who have used their veto power 42 times to protect Israel, including with respect to a very similar resolution in 2011.
hmmm. could it be because the jews are most powerful in the US?
Thats a conspiracy theory. Anything that hasn’t been proven by a man wearing a rain jacket indoors is a lie.
Just look at the above pic of the store owned by Jews. This is what you call America at its finest. The same reason why Jews controlled the dumbest nation in the 1st world.
And I mean controlled, because Jews no longer control it. America is basically a dead corpse. Proleness is the cancer metastasized and killed it, and Jews are the most carcinogenic.
Interesting you mention Philosophy as an undergrad Dildos. I would say that’s a good indicator of high IQ.
Here’s answers for Robert.
Q1. what is the difference between analytic/anglo-american/oxford philosophy and autism?
One is a rationale for being unable to see the world as it is. The other is merely the circumstance.
Q2. why should all departments of academic philosophy be closed?
Because they are sophistry and linguistic philosophy and belong in law school.
Q3. what group of philosophy dons was contemporary anal-ytic philosophastering a reaction against?
I believe they called it the continental school, or essentially those that spoke freely without consulting dictionaries. I’m unsure specifically.
If you want my meta answer – those that wrote about jews like Nietzsche, Marx or Schopenhauer and had to be replaced by the dictionary.
Q4. name the three prominent german philosophers who were inspired most by kant?
Hegel, Schopenhauer, and I assume Heidegger seen as you’re so fond of him.
Q5. summarize the Critique of Pure Reason in one sentence.
Reason alone is the means by which man can understand reality.
(He was partially wrong)
Q6. who were the schoolmen?
Dunno.
Q7. why is a college course in ethics a contradiction in terms?
I suppose you would say ethics can’t be taught but practiced/felt/experienced.
Q8. state godel’s incompleteness theorem.
A system of constructs and axioms needs an alternate system of logical constructs and axioms to corroborate it.
Kind of like how an empirical study needs external validity, as well as internal validity. But a step further to say internal validity cannot be presumed without external v.
I had actually signed up for philosophy in college but changed to economics after two weeks to improve my employment prospects. In the same way economics was pozzed, I assume philosophy would have been a similar journey to the heart of Merriam Webster and the riddles of word meaning and enlightenment.
Q7. why is a college course in ethics a contradiction in terms?
I suppose you would say ethics can’t be taught but practiced/felt/experienced.
Nah Mugabe would say college is unethical and all professors should be arrested or something outlandish like that. Mugabe is edgy.
Hahaha true.
Actually he would say that it merely exists to inculcate the masses with Master’s desired thought patterns – which is true too I suppose.
Mugabe is a Zizek disciple. I think Zizek says some insightful things but there’s a formula to it. His insight is simply turning conventional wisdom on its head. He does it effectively but the formula is there for all to see.
Zizek as far as I can tell is a sophist. Maybe I’m too stupid or he’s too stupid and needs to conceal his lack of dialectic in rhetoric masquerading as dialectic.
He drags a lot of stuff into the nihilist camp of skepticism. Is that smart? Maybe.
People that can’t speak their arguments plainly are usually frauds. Remember that Dildos for the rest of your life. In any ad, in any contract, in any lecture, in any nightclub pickup and in any sales pitch.
Like those Frankfurt School Jews who invented rac-ism in the 1940s. ‘Language has no meaning. Ergo, the word ‘race’ has no meaning.’ (in 7000 words)
Alright then! I’m sold! Where do I sign up? How many more used caravans can I order?
I’m reading Thomas Aquinas now. He wrote in the 1400s and I can understand him, but not Zizek. Sum-ting-wong as the Chinese would say.
Zizek is not hard to follow, at least in videos. I haven’t read his books. Not sure why you can’t. Any specific examples?
I’ve read passages from his books. Its dense stuff. Yeah, he can speak somewhat fluidly on tv. But it’s not like I’m glued hearing it. I suppose I’m a big fan of the geographer David Harvey and Zizek talks about the same stuff. .
Great book. Explains neoliberalism is a racket, not a system. Reagan/Thatcher destroyed the UK/USA. The easing of credit hides the structural mess.
Q7…DEAL GET IT!
or as honkies say it…GETS IT!
aquinas didn’t write in the 1400s fucktard! he was dead!
People that can’t speak their arguments plainly are usually frauds.
JEIN!
it’s true for smart people, not for dumb people…like ALL anglo-american philosophy professors.
what is true for all is…dumb people will dismiss those they can’t understand as speakers of gibberish.
examples:
1. heidegger and hegel are NOT gibberish, NOR are they intentionally obscure. their obscurity comes from two sources…concision (they were writing for themselves not for their readers) and as heidegger put it, Making itself intelligible is suicide for philosophy. Those who idolize “facts” never notice that their idols only shine in a borrowed light.
BUT
2. ALL french “philosophy” of the late 20th c is either gibberish or intentionally obscure.
an interesting book:
so the jew derrida and the roman marion and the secular bourdieu are…
1. very very smart guys.
2. intentionally obscure.
being intentionally obscure and being a fraud are two different things.
ALL WRONG ANSWERS! VERY VERY WRONG!
mssr philosophe.
People that can’t write clearly a complicated argument simply don’t have the verbal intelligence to make a complicated argument.
If you have abilities in this area, you should be able to use your NARR function to distill the argument into a few sentences, an analogy, a piece of fiction/satire or invent the language necessary to do so, depending on your audience.
Writing like a pozzed meth addict usually reflects a disordered mind or autism. I’ve never read Heidegger but I’ve read Sartre and now Aquinas and can understand them. Sartre is writing artistically to an extent, not dialectically.
But Zizek is not writing rhetorically and his dialectic didgeridoo aint exactly lightin my magic underwear when I read him. I think he was caught for plagiarising a few times.
Now that I’ve passed your Xmas pop quiz, you pass mine.
1. Is morality an illusion? (Yes or No,)
2. What is the optimum means of happiness with ill side effect as discussed by Freud? 1 word
3. The Trolley problem is an example of what type of ethics problem? 1 word
4. How does Hegelian history differ from Whigean?
5. Aristotelian logic dictates that we can make Boolean logic statements about future events. What 3 things did he not account for?
6. Plato’s forms: Psychological or substantive?
7. List the primary and secondary qualities of your 80GB porn cache.
8. Popper said we make hypothesis with the idea of making them as easily falsifiable as possible and build from there. Aquinas says this is impossible – why?
9. What was Machiavelli’s ideal state structure?
10. Marx offered a critique of capitalism based on material inequality, meta inefficiency and what other important facet?
Tick Tock. If you haven’t read them, just say pass.
no.
i’ve never read steven king.
more’s the…
what’s the opposite of pity?
all the answers to my 8 questions have non jive-turkey answers.
i’ll give them if you beg.
I never beg for anything that takes someone 25+ minutes to google research.
Thumbs up for McDonald’s University of Philosophy.
then do it! man up! t…up! tee up!
funny…john daly has a john holmes…according to norm macdonald, “it has its own liver.”
tee up! another huge cock viking manque!
tonight i’ve treated myself to $40 in 4 beers.
what does 1,000 IBUs taste like. i’ll find out!
http://lh3.ggpht.com/-VH_xWd2c6ho/UPXg25-KPkI/AAAAAAABe5Q/tZ4Uo__QxI4/image_thumb.png?imgmax=800
from another viking, Mikkel Borg Bjergsø.
People need to drop the IQ penis competition by the way.
You don’t need a very high IQ to be successful, masculine, ethical, or even insightful.
Wittgenstein had a very high IQ, and wasn’t successful, masculine, insightful.
And he wasn’t ethical either because autists don’t ‘choose’ to be ethical…they are bred to be. The only true ethics comes from those who can give it.
‘T is mightiest in the mightiest: it becomes
The throned monarch better than his crown;
His sceptre shows the force of temporal power,
The attribute to awe and majesty,
Wherein doth sit the dread and fear of kings;
But mercy is above this sceptred sway,
It is enthroned in the hearts of kings,
It is an attribute to God himself;
– William Shakespeare, Merchant of Venice.
Amazing how you just ignore more than 50 % of the population. Only men are allowed to be ethical, smart, and insightful?
Maybe 5% of high IQ people know that testosterone affects thinking more than reading any book ever will.
And it is clearer thinking than thinking related to justifying your hurt feelings and emotions i.e. sophistry.
I’m not hurt; just genuinely concerned that you don’t think of women as people.
what did shak mean by that?
(((christianity))) is more than jewish.
it’s anti-jewish.
it makes a mockery of judaism just as it made a mockery of ancient greco-roman religion.
judaism = following the rules…be autistic…it’s salvation…the best any can hope for…plus always favor your fellow jew.
jesus dick slapped the jews…and they’re still addled and angry.
In a universe that’s governed by natural constants and laws, it’s hardly surprising that we are “obedient” to conventions. Human society in a global sense is governed by its own laws but they are not required and individuals can do without them. However, can humanity do without them?
Would cynicism disappear if cynics followed Kant’s first formulation of the Categorical Imperative? It says act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.
More autism. Iths a compeethition noth a engineeeeering prothect sillee.
if you want to understand philosophy read Nietzsche. Its much less boring to boot because he can think like a normal person.
~#The Struggle of the Will~~**
Zion knows what I’m talking about. You think they follow Nietzsche or Kant? So do the Orcs in Kinshasa (instinctively, as they can’t be brainwashed like whites), the Haradrim Arabs, the Duke of Muscovy and the Emperor of Heaven.
A Struggle!
It never occurred to you that I’m one of the good guys and I want to protect the realm from the Necromancer and his Orcs.
They all want to be near white people all the time. They can’t survive or prosper otherwise. But they take, and don’t give.
A Black man’s biggest fear is being sent back to Africa.
Everyone wants to be near white people
Because they can’t stand being near low empathy bad people like themselves.
Both Kant and Nietzsche bad some insightful things to say. It’s extremely ridiculous and unfair to just dismiss Kant as an autist. You are a ridiculous person.
Read about his personal life.
Obama gives UN veto on Israel. Well done Obama. I always said Obama was a good president. .
Obama might be the first pol to stand up to Zion since JFK. Brave man. Zion put him there for a social purpose, but he’s no Manchurian Candidate.
Bravery.
That’s what this world needs.
THANKS OBAMA!
Obama might be the first pol to stand up to Zion since JFK. Brave man. Zion put him there for a social purpose, but he’s no Manchurian Candidate
Oprah (who campaigned in 2007 in several critical states)was far more instrumental in electing Obama than any individual Jew, most of whom preferred Hillary in the Democratic primary.
One more reason why i strongly dislike her. Obama did jackshit for this country. Thank God he’ll get out next month. I can’t wait! Going to throw a party too! And you know damn well that Oprah only did this because he’s black guy, not because he was the best guy for the job. Impossible!
Your boi Trump got Egypt to withdraw sponsorship of the resolution. Seems like the pussy grabber-in-chief is a big fan of the Zion, eh? You voted for him because he’s an “alpha” but you were thinking with your penis?
I didn’t mean you literally voted for him as you can’t.
Though this be madness, yet there is method in ’t.
With due respect, no there isn’t. Trump is an idiot, not a genius. He’s not this master manipulator as Lion believes. Lion is a nerdy Jewish loser. He doesn’t have a high enough social IQ to see through the rather transparent Trump. Honestly, my opinion of Lion is extremely low. He’s not smart like at all.
Trump loves Israel. He won’t do anything for America. Watch.
I’m in mania or something. Can’t sleep. Will read The Razor’s Edge. Bye.
Merry Christmas.
“Israel rejects this shameful anti-Israel resolution at the U.N. and will not abide by its terms,” Mr. Netanyahu said in a statement. “At a time when the Security Council does nothing to stop the slaughter of half a million people in Syria, it disgracefully gangs up on the one true democracy in the Middle East, Israel, and calls the Western Wall ‘occupied territory.’ ”
Mr. Netanyahu immediately retaliated against two of the countries that sponsored the resolution. He ordered Israel’s ambassadors to New Zealand and Senegal to return home for consultations, canceled a planned visit to Israel next month by Senegal’s foreign minister and cut off all aid programs to Senegal.
What a day. Indeed. Merry Xmas.
One of the other problems with the simplification of Asian people’s as K selected are, along with the somewhat schizotypal Japanese, the fairly R selected Mongol peoples.
People forget not only Genghis Khan and the millitary successes that basically ended in Europe with his illness, but the previous Hun invasion of Europe a few hundred years earlier that precipitated the collapse of Rome.
The Roman historians called the Huns, the evil exiled demons of the Goths which tells you something vis the horrific stuff they were doing.
They also smashed the Persians, Turks, Slavs and Saracens who were more wealthy than Europe at the time.
Steve Sailer mentioned a few months ago how many Sumo wrestlers or either Islanders or Mongol.
Human Biodiversity is such an interesting topic, especially when one looks at history as opposed to the present day. Today Mongolia is nowhere near the level of development of most East Asian type nations, with the exception of Burma.
“Human Biodiversity is such an interesting topic, especially when one looks at history as opposed to the present day. Today Mongolia is nowhere near the level of development of most East Asian type nations, with the exception of Burma.”
Almost as if civilizations rise and fall and one’s success a millennia ago isn’t conducive to success today.
Yet inner mongolia is doing just fine, its comparable to the richer areas of china.
https://iq-research.info/en/page/average-iq-by-country
Mongolia is joint 6th in the world today, despite having similar infrastructure and nutrition levels to a lot of other Central Asian states.
I also note Israel is merely 12th.
I thought about it, and it would seem the lower IQ jews emigrate to Israel, and the higher IQ ones stay in New York, Washington, London and so on. I would guess also there are more sephardics and ethiopian jews there, and a significant enough arab minority dragging that score down.
Otherwise its obvious from all other data, jews are smarter than east asians, particularly the g loaded verbal scores.
Israel is only 47.7 percent Ashkenazi.
Also look at Italy. Its the highest IQ european country.
Some would find this very shocking.
But makes sense when you consider Italy is the birthplace of Rome and the Renaissance.
Speaking of Italy.
Look at this.
http://www.unz.com/akarlin/not-sending-their-best/#comment-1701469
This guy computed muh PISA scores to IQ scores for Campania. Someone linked my article BTFOing Lynn.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/11/03/northsouth-differences-in-italian-iq-is-richard-lynn-right-part-ii/
Still waiting for PP’s thoughts on Lynn’s “Italian ‘IQ'” numbers.
But yea Phil, you’re right there.
Others studies show italian’s average IQ to be lower than that. You shouldn’t take these studies too litteraly, these are only approximations of the reality.
RR, according to Occam’s razor it seems pretty obvious that southern Italians would have a lower average IQ than northern Italians.
In Europe (and probably anywhere else in the world), the more you go south, the lower the average IQ is.
In Europe (and probably anywhere else in the world), the more you go south, the lower the average IQ is.
Not true in India (interestingly) or the Southern Hemisphere.
Not true in India (interestingly) or the Southern Hemisphere.
It’s no true in India?
“RR, according to Occam’s razor it seems pretty obvious that southern Italians would have a lower average IQ than northern Italians.”
Occam’s razor doesn’t say anything to claims that there are huge flaws in using PISA to convert to IQ scores and that on RAPM they score higher or score the same.
It’s no true in India?
It’s true according to some study Dr. James Thompson cited last year. I’m on my phone now so I don’t feel like looking for it (no bookmarks).
*not true
India is too low. With adequate nutrition/sanitation/schooling they should be in the top 10. I think indian americans do the best of all asian groups in the West and other European countries. We’ve had 2 indian Tier 1 bank CEOs and zero east asians.
No.
India has well over 1 billion people. Indians here are hyper selected. Having 2 “tier one bank CEOs” may be an overrepresentation, but it’s because they were purposefully
selected to be at that ability level.
Indeed pp has blogged as to why India’s current IQ is so high when taking into account malnutrition.
This was obviously designed to make Indians look good relative to Asian which you think will make people think bad of Asians (since you don’t think people *actually* think highly of Indians)
SEPARATE YOUR PERSONAL BIASES FROM REALITY.
Willie is right, American Indians are not a representative population.
But British Indians are as there was hardly any selection on those arrivals in the 60s and 70s. Would be interesting to see IQ scores for British indians.
Also we’ve had an Indian Managing Partner at McKinsey and Deloitte and current indian Big Tech CEOs at Google and Microsoft. Its an incredible track record when you think about it.
We’ve had 2 indian Tier 1 bank CEOs and zero east asians.
such indians are just very dark skinned caucasoids. they’re whiter than n africans and most peninsular arabs.
“aryan” and “swastika” are SANSKRIT words.
so they are “honorary whites”. a chink at the head of J P Morgan…
never gonna happen…and it’s due to a kind of rac-ism…norms of reaction.
The whitest Indian I’ve ever seen is Governor Nikki Haley. I was surprised to find out she’s Indian.
deal and her people believe in “the great spirit”.
the great spirit:
btw, why have all the canadian mj stocks tripled in 6 months?
peepee will like this:
http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/2133/25412176/1409967828183/palestinian+land+loss.jpg?token=DBQZmXGRyPzNM0byTY5h7fEdRcg%3D
Fioruisce
yes.
the odd thing about the irish are the injuns of europe thing is…
1. the irish were the FIRST to distil in europe.
2. the slavs are the world champion drinkers, not the irish.
mssr philosophe believes in gut feelings and that some such feelings have evolved over 10s of thousands of years and are thus trustworthy even if inscrutable.
i agree in part.
with indians who have a european facial skeleton i, for one, feel nothing negative. for black africans and ne asians a little…except the japs!
the japanese american is white…so to say. i went to school with some japs, and their race was never even a thought for anyone…seriously! and they were great athletes!
it may be quite different in britain, due to the raj.
No offence but you are definitely racist despite what you claim. You’ve said some hideous things about so many different ethnic groups. Don’t hate me for telling the truth.
only a racist would say such. ^^^
only a VERY BORING racist.
Comments like this make me think you plagiarize comments.
Philosopher continues to show his 46 IQ and autism.
Racism is a categorization of human behavior, and our modern day definition is believing race is real /meaningful biologically.
You can not chimp out at a *classification* of human behavior or a way of looking at things- that’s retarded. You can disagree with it all you want but it’s just an organizational concept.
I say 5+2+3=10
You say 5+5=10
Get it?
Tou say “racism” is the normative behavior and a negative connotation is propaganda. We say it is triggered by low amydgala function.
You’re both dumb as shit.
misdreavus was totally right. “mugabe” is the only regular commenter who has anything worthwhile to say.
Lion has gone off the reservation about the UN security council vote. time to re-censor myself.
Maybe Israel wouldn’t be the most hated nation in the world if it wasn’t a parody of Mordor.
it is a parody.
42 vetoes.
what’s enough noam?
43?
the speaker of truth is confounded by his EGI.
pathetic!
peepee should curl up with this…actuarial maths is pretty fucking easy, but to pass the exams you really need to practice.
i called the author of this book a “kike” in emails and over the phone. what has mssr philosophe done to prove his anti-semitic mettle?
and i passed all the objective exams the first time.
it was only with the newly introduced subjective component that i was failed twice when very few are failed once and the same author was in charge of the grading…and “point blank” refused to explain why i had been failed.
i have experienced anti-gentile discrimination…
mssr concern troll HAS NOT!
and lest peepee give some bullshit psychiatric explanation for these failures on the subjective part…
i gave what i’d submitted to someone who’s won prizes for his writing…
he couldn’t explain why i’d been failed…his only thought was that actuaries tend to be high M low V…or at least “not so high” V…and therefore what i’d written was gibberish for them.
it sounds self serving, but…
1. i didn’t say it.
2. the one interview i had with an actuary who had served as a grader also…what did she say?
the most absurd thing…
she said…
“he’s too smart to be an actuary.”
so you see sometimes the paranoia and self-serving explanations of smart people are…
TRUE.
even though they’re almost always FALSE.
You should let me administer to you a SUBJECTIVELY scored verbal test, that schizophrenics tend to do poorly on. I will keep the results confidential unless you ask they be released. I am interested for scientific purposes only.
b….t….w….
my story is TRUE…
IT HAPPENED!
“i called the author of this book a “kike” in emails and over the phone. what has mssr philosophe done to prove his anti-semitic mettle?”
Four years ago I was in Times Square with my (then) girlfriend. I keep very long hair and a beard and some Jew saw me and said “Happy Hannukah”. I looked at him and said “Merry Christmas, I’m Roman Catholic”. He didn’t like that too much.
I was at Barnes n Noble today buying a few books and the cashier told me ‘Happy Holidays’. I said ‘Merry Christmas’. Hate this attack on Christmas.
What’s the opposite of self-pity Robert?
murder?
Self-murder?
rome still rules.
not joking.
turn up the volume.
and get it.
And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
Mugabe’s liver is gonna give out at this rate. Sad.
english is your second language? third?
deal is affirmative action ruining it for everyone else. sad.
drinking contest…
100% western european vs
the best from the rest of the world.
white man wins AGAIN!
Reading your posts is a painful experience. Seriously. You are a fcking lunatic.
so your first language is what?
Mugabe’s liver is gonna give out at this rate. Sad.
What are you talking about?
he loves you peepee. even though you’re a black lesbian.
should deal actually read The Razor’s Edge she will discover that larry darrell is my hero.
mullet and all.
I didn’t know it’s a white trash novel.
Vancouver! Vancouver! This is it!
let’s get some bill walton up in hear!
it happens…
Came across this solid paper today: The Threat of Increasing Diversity: Why Many White Americans Supported Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election
White Americans exposed to more diversity are more likely to support Trump, anti-PC speech and anti-immigration policies while showing less support and positivity towards Democratic candidates. In the racial shift group, whites with low racial identity, ethnic replacement didn’t seem to care about ethnic replacement and showed stronger support for Democratic candidates. To wake up more whites to anti-immigration sentiments and white identity politics, you need to show them the effects of diversity in the social context as well as what a demographic replacement will mean in the next two decades.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/12/24/the-threat-of-increasing-diversity-why-many-white-americans-supported-trump-in-the-2016-presidential-election/
i recall hearing this in mobile hall at spring hill college…a long time ago.
the guy blasting it apologiized as his vw trekker had made him deaf.
that’s not it!
fucking jews!
do canadians have to say “happy holidays”?
do any people on earth say “happy holidays” other than americans?
how much is enough jews?
you’re 2% of the population, and hanukkah is one judaism’s MINOR holidays.
do canadians have to say “happy holidays”?
Yes, but in many ways Canada is the 51st state. We’re closer to the contiguous U.S. than Alaska is and we watch more American TV than Canadian TV.
I always say merry Christmas to these Christ-hating commies. I said it all day yesterday. Because I AM NOT A ROBOT.
Ontario is indeed the 51st state and Alaska is as prole as any mainland American state. The rest of Anglo Prole Canada has certain features typical in the USA such as high housing costs and income inequality.
Québec is a completely different animal from the rest of North America.
“how much is enough jews?”
0 percent of the population.
Merry Christmas to you too Mugabe!
It’s hilarious how he gets triggered when you call him white trash.
Mugabe’s liver hates him. Sad.
It’s hilarious how he gets triggered when you call him white trash.
Despite all of Mugabe’s higher learning and Harvard ancestors, and despite all my horror and talk show watching, if Mugabe and I walked into a restaurant, I would be assumed to be of higher class, and deep down he knows it, and it kills him, and it explains all his behavior.
His bro and dad are more successful than him I think. He’s the black sheep of the family.
I actually feel really bad for him. He’s deeply troubled. I wish him the best sincerely and all the other troubled souls that post on this blog.
I actually feel really bad for him. He’s deeply troubled. I wish him the best sincerely and all the other troubled souls that post on this blog.
My blog is the only thing some of these people have.
Promise me Pumpkin that there is a backup server, hard data file or a cached version worthy of this blog.
Mugabe is a smart guy but mentally perturbed.
Philosopher just uses that as an excuse to disguise from his low intellect.
“My blog is the only thing some of these people have”
“Promise me Pumpkin that there is a backup server, hard data file or a cached version worthy of this blog.”
Lol
Merry Christmas friends.
Merry Christmas
One of the things one always finds in online or offline communities associated with ‘atheism’, ‘high IQ’, and other congregations of the faithful is that many such people buy into meeting up/discussing around these concepts as worthy of conferring higher social status.
By definition, many of the people, including some commenters here – but not all – are trying to make up for low social status.
This is why we have IQ penis size competitions for people with no penises.
Let me make this very simple to our girly gamma brethren:
1. Penis size is almost as important as IQ for social status.
2. Using your IQ to make blog comments doesn’t make you smart per se, depending on the eye of the beholder. But using your IQ to increase penis size does.
3. No, I’m not joking.
4. What’s worse than autism? Being Brainwashed. Autism is blindness. Being Brainwashed = willing slavery.
5. Rac-ism was made up by (((Trotsky))) for communist equalism purposes and perfected and intellectualised by the (((Frankfurt))) school of ‘philosophy’ in the 1940s. Google it. Don’t argue.
6. Trotsky hates you if you’re white gentile.
7. Get off the road. You’re backing up traffic.
As I’ve explained to your Narrow Black Schizo brain before;
“Racism” was not *invented*, the term racism is a CLASSIFICATION *of certain behaviors*.
You can’t just attack the source of ideas/abstractions and think that it defeats the abstraction/ideas.
You claim IQ isn’t measured in blog comments. That’s obviously a highly self interested move.
(a) You speak like you have a vagina.
(b) “Racism” is akin to “blasphemy”, “idolatry”, and “treason” // not to “migration”, “hazing” and “culture”.
(c) It was categorised by higher IQ people than you. Before that it was known by laymen as ‘white tribalism’. Racism can’t be perpetrated by blacks….or jews. You never notice how remarkably odd that is? Because it’s not odd. Its an intrinsic feature.
(d) Brainwashing is a forced emotional investment of the ego into a ‘moral’ abstraction. It works best from childhood – hence why they control Hollywood and academia. Controlling Hollywood is more important than Wall Street. The Church has known this for 2000 years.
(e) If Trotsky sells you a dodgy property in Bulgaria, and I point it out for the first time in your 25-30 odd year life, you have three options:
(i) admit you’re an idiot all these years along with your passionate bar room social justice debates where you thought you were smart for once and your goodfeelz volunteering for orcs for Zion while he laughed at you and your idiot colleagues humiliation
(ii) try to sell me aforesaid Bulgarian ‘dascha’
(iii) or make do with it and improve upon it and someday prove to the ‘hatas’ that it really is fundamentally, a a damn good property.
Trotsky c 1903
The good news, is that if you can reflect, deduce and see the hatred and evil behind the concept and its intention for you, your family and progeny, you may well live another 40-50 years in truth and being informed as to make the best decisions for yourself.
Zionism has created a Jim Jones suicide cult for white people.
Don’t be these guys:
Heaven was a place on earth called the West.
Don’t turn it into Kinshasa, which is hell.
One is objectively good for you. One is objectively bad.
Zion’s genius is priming you to believe there is no difference but of circumstance.
Edward Munch is a very gifted painter.
Still the greatest game in video game history according to many after 10 years.
Epic.
The bleeding edge of 2000. Very advanced gameplay for the time.
That was a great game. Never played the ones after 3 though. The end of this game was cool.
The best fight is the last one with The Boss. And the Ladder. I don’t know which one I like better. MGS2 was a mind fuck at the end.
PP: So Lion talks about the shopping malls of the 80s era, when it was very White and today there are not.
The 80s era however was much darker than the dark skin found on black people. It was the golden age of tacky horror movies and the entire decade had a deranged factor to it. If you watched the Tales from the Darkside tv series, there was an episode about the Christmas Holiday called the Seasons of Belief, where a monster called the Grither attacks and kills the members of a family who decides to celebrate the holiday by reading a scary story, sort of a horrific X’mas Carol moment. And this episode was aired during or close to the holiday.
If you haven’t noticed, White people are more civilized than they were 30 years ago, and other the groups are heading into the same direction, but it seems like blacks are still savage in nature, and it’s only them. Interestingly, I think the 80s culture has nothing do with current decline of America.