Apparently when I complained about the Facts of Life IQ episode going missing from Youtube on my blog yesterday, people in high places noticed because the show has been returned:
I got the most beautiful email this morning apologizing, saying they had no idea someone as important as me was watching, and they’re so honored to have me as a fan. I’ve printed out the email and framed it.
I’m even being sent the complete series on DVD, a poster signed by all the stars of the show, and vintage Facts of Life T-shirts. They don’t know what size I take, so get this. They’re sending me one in:
EVERY
SINGLE
SIZE!
Not to brag, but I am Pumpkin Person.
Meanwhile here’s vintage opening theme song from the The Facts of Life. What I love about the opening is Charlotte Rae (who played wise den mother Mrs Garrett) sings a line in the theme song itself in her loveable cackling voice, and that line is heard as her character is on screen smiling (excellent editing!)
When your books are what you’re there about
But looks are what you care about
The time is right
To learn the Facts of Life
See 0:47 in the video below:
I was so touched by the level of respect I’ve been shown that I spent the afternoon watching The Facts of Life reunion TV movie from 2001. It was pretty cheesy in that warm fuzzy way we expect from TV chick flicks, but it was great seeing the girls we grew up watching blossom into beautiful adult women.
Blair played by Lisa Whelchel is predictably married to some Ken doll rich guy.
Natalie, played by Mindy Cohn has grown up to be a successful journalist obsessively pursued by two good looking guys (You Go Girl!)
Tootie (aka Dorthy) played by Kim Fields has blossomed into a truly gorgeous black woman, and is working as a talk show host and aspiring actress.
Why would white women support Philosopher’s cause when he calls women dumb and property? Maybe Mugabe is right about Philosopher being a concern troll.
The fraction of humanity that would support Philosopher’s cause and HBD in general is extremely small. See all the groups that they directly or indirectly insult frequently:
-Non-whites
-Jews
-Liberals
-Women
-Masculine males
-Gays
-The rich
-The poor
who’s left ?
Mostly conservative nerdy middle class white males (as well as some white females) and some self-hating non-whites and gays. Guys that are afraid of walking alone at night but believe they’re going to make any difference in this world.
They just want to go back to the 1950s and earlier when white men were kings and women were their property. Black people were considered less than human, homosexuality was a disease, etc.. That’s why Trump won. White men are tired of having to compete with women and people of color in all domains.
Afrosapiens what are your thoughts on affirmative action? Basically what are your thoughts on equality of outcome?
I agree with the principle of Affirmative action but I think it’s not well done in the USA. First, affirmative action should focus on private sector employment like in South Africa, second it should target low skilled people first. Because affirmative action in college admissions favors people who would do well in life without it (if not better) and it’s not uplifting the needy underclass. Affirmative action in the public sector is OK, but it doesn’t have the reach of private sector and it doesn’t increase career opportunities outside public administration, education, health and social services.
I lived for 2 years in East London bud-eh in a borough with the highest murder rate in Europe.
Bud-eh.
Most of those murderers were blacks and MENA peoples.
Bud-eh
My housemate was mugged by two blacks outside the front door.
Bud-eh
Some Algerian asshole scammed me on a flat in Greenwich.
Bud-eh.
I walked home just fine – but in hindsight, should have armed myself.
So one day, my female housemate kept complaining about all the blacks approaching her in the course of her day. I was pretty amazed because I hadn’t been London long and didn’t know what the dealio was. It was intriguing – was it bad socialisation, low education….to keep approaching women in the street like that.
Its one of the secrets most women know in London I think, that betas don’t pick up on.
I asked myself, blacks seem to have very little approach anxiety around women or around people walking home and demanding their wallets.
As I came to make black friends in work and travel with them or hit clubs, it became obvious that blacks didn’t have lower AA due to repetition per se as they claimed, but they, like their murder rates, low impulse control and so on, demonstrated a lean towards psychopathy, hence the faces and people’s reactions to them.
Its not the IQ that makes them dangerous like conservatives suggest, but the psychopathy. The key point is that Zion obscures this crucial difference and forces Europe to take them in.
It was only reading Murray’s article on the topic I had an intellectual empirical argument for the hunch. You can’t talk about it with anyone obviously.
Most of my family, colleagues and friends are similarly pozzed so you have a Winston Smith thing going on everytime you look at tube advertisements, people getting hired, nightclub patterns and so on.
I started naturally moving away from those guys.
Most blacks are not ‘nice guys’ who are waiting to be not repressed by whites…otherwise they wouldn’t keep coming to Europe. They are soft psychopaths like Afro.
I had first noticed blacks different behaviours living in Singapore actually but that is a story for another day. At that time, I just noticed East Asians behaviours more.
I believe most people know a good deal about things I point out. Even Deal with Dogging! Even my old black friends deep down. The problem is nobody is allowed to talk about it, so as the sociologists say we have a hyperreality of the media public/academia mind giving an Illusion, and a de facto social reality.
But reflexivity a la Soros dictates that the media hivemind, can influence the individual mind even if its completely detached from fundamentals and so we have the horror of KINSHASA.
That’s why the jew journalist wants those images. And wants those images of crying refugee children. They are insidious saboteurs. Neocons. Traitors. Scoundrels.
To be more factual, we can see the effects of Affirmative action by the change in income distribution among blacks.
The upper income segment went from 5% in 1971 to 12% in 2015
The middle income segment went from 46% in 1971 to 45% in 2015
The lower income segment went from 48% in 1971 to 43% in 2015
So 7% of the population has joined the upper class, 1% have left the middle class and 5% have left the lower class.
http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2015/12/09/2-changes-in-income-status-vary-across-demographic-groups/
That’s what affirmative action has achieved. Turning pre-civil right black America’s universal African level poverty to Latin American inequality. I’ve read somewhere that if Black America were a country, its social structure would be similar to Brazil’s or Jamaica’s.
Now I believe the US decided to promote racial integration in the elite rather than in the lower class because having policies that directly threaten the white working class in their job security would have been suicidal. On the other hand, elites don’t really mind race, there are some dumb rich racists but it’s much less common than in the general population. This policy has made some blacks happy, and that’s good for them but it hasn’t addressed the fundamental issues of the underclass.
Philosturbator, weren’t you supposed to sleep ?
i personally don’t like AA. I believe it should be down to ability, 100 percent. Smart AA? Get him in. Dumb white? He’s out. Smart white? In. Dumb black? Out. I personally think pushing people through for their race, skin color, creed, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, etc is horrible and it most always overlooks a better candidate. I think this is wrong:
Why should there be such favoring there? The best of the best should get admitted, race/any type of status be damned. The most intelligent and able of the populace should attend institutions of higher learning. This is one thing we should not look at race for.
I think something must be done to to counter the effects of current prejudice and historical discrimination. In low skilled jobs, what makes the difference is race, not merit because unskilled jobs are jobs that anyone can do, AA would be needed to give equal chances. Affirmative action should be aimed at equalizing opportunities of similarly competent people not promoting people in in colleges or jobs for which they are not competent. But judging someone’s competence is not easy and always subjective, there is no objective way to know if a student or an employee will be successful. And this uncertainty leaves much room to prejudice, so affirmative action is a good thing. But I’m not a fanatic of AA, there is no policy of this kind in France. I wouldn’t mind if we had it but I’m definitely not asking for it. I prefer strategies like testing business on their recruiting preferences and fining them heavily if they are found to discriminate against some groups.
I support AA because humans are tribal, so if you don’t have laws preventing people from favoring their own, they’ll just hire people who look like themselves and exclude everyone else. Also, people will be judged based on their group membership, not their individual merits.
However the way affirmative action is practiced in the United States is extremely unfair, because whites lose jobs to make room for blacks and Hispanics, but since Jews are not recognized as a race, they’re allowed to be 50% of the media despite being 2% of the country. White Gentiles get squeezed out from both directions.
I was about to ask what do you all think about class-based affirmative action, but Afrosapiens and Deal with it! already answered the question.
I’m personally conflicted. Part of me wants to do away with affirmative action altogether, but the other part of me wants affirmative action on a class-basis, but it should be strong at all levels of employment (not just entry-level jobs), and in the private sector in addition to the public sector, and with no regards to race at all.
A robust affirmative action system with no regards to race would help boost the outcomes of smart working class people without creating racial resentment, unlike what affirmative currently does. Unfortunately, this would disproportionately help working class whites, not blacks or other minorities, because working class minorities (even Asians) tend to be pretty dumb (or at least don’t do well on g-loaded tests).
OK, now we know one of PP’s liberal positions, but he can’t help but reguriitating some far-right antisemitism.
Jews control the media ? Fine, and how aren’t whites able to own their media outlets ? Anyone can own a newspaper, a TV channel or a website and then hire journalists. But if that’s done in order to explain how whites are the most persecuted people on earth, the audience will be limited.
OK, now we know one of PP’s liberal positions, but he can’t help but reguriitating some far-right antisemitism.
Jews control the media ?
Far-right anti-Semitism? Your IQ is not great.
1) anti-Semitism is far LEFT, not far right
2) I didn’t say Jews controlled the media, but even if I had, it would be an empirical description, not an ethnic slur
3) The fact that you think it’s anti-Semitic to observe Jewish power shows how much power they really have. They’re so powerful it’s taboo to even speak of their power.
Anyone can own a newspaper, a TV channel or a website and then hire journalists.
Don’t be stupid, only the rich can buy TV channels and major newspapers.
But if that’s done in order to explain how whites are the most persecuted people on earth, the audience will be limited.
Did I say that? No. But they are fucked over by affirmative action. U.S. whites should lobby for proportional representation for white Gentiles.
“1) anti-Semitism is far LEFT, not far right”
Uh ? Are the Nazis, fascists, and reactionaries far-left ? Do you know how many of socialism and communism’s most important theoreticians were Jews, Zionism itself was born in Jewish far-left circles.
“The fact that you think it’s anti-Semitic to observe Jewish power shows how much power they really have. They’re so powerful it’s taboo to even speak of their power.”
The Jews have a high presence in the media because they were, and still are to a certain extant, unable to achieve much in electoral politics. But since they are a large share of the upper class and they have political views to, they chose to conquer the public opinion instead of the electoral vote.
“Don’t be stupid, only the rich can buy TV channels and major newspapers.”
There are many many rich whites you know.
“U.S. whites should lobby for proportional representation for white Gentiles.”
How ? by forcing Jews to sell shares of their media outlets (and their companies as a whole) ? by replacing Jewish journalists by white ones ?
You know, Affirmative action only exists to heal the wounds of centuries of white male domination dictated by law. You won’t be able to ask for more whites in football teams, it is not about having proportional representations of each community in each sphere, it’s about reversing discriminatory policies.
“but the other part of me wants affirmative action on a class-basis, but it should be strong at all levels of employment (not just entry-level jobs)”
I will probably sound a bit “classist” but I hate the idea of having rednecks or proles of any race in positions of power. That would lead to a Trumpization of the elite and the meaning of elite would rely solely on money whereas the elite also has a cultural and moral dimension that is the sole cause of the West’s exceptionalism.
Affirmative action must take race into account, I believe middle or upper income blacks face more discrimination than low income whites. Discrimination is not about income or wealth, it’s about race, so affirmative action must be about race too, even though taking wealth as the main criterion allows to keep favoring minorities in a covert way.
It’s not enough to just cite the stats to assert that Jews control the media/insert x domain. One needs to do an investigation. What accounts for this statistic? People claim white gentiles get the shaft in Ivy league admissions. Ok but on what basis? Are the admissions staff positively picking out Jews based on last name? Or is it that Jews have higher SAT scores? If the former, that’s a real conspiracy. If the latter, the only “solution” is to set the bar higher for Jews like they do with Asians. An alternative would be to change the system altogether.
Let’s talk about the media. Why do Jews control 50% of the media despite being 2% of the country (as per PP)? Do Jews prefer fellow Jews over more qualified gentiles? Are Jews “more qualified” than gentiles? If you’re going to fix the problem, establish that it is a real problem. This is where the Philosopher types fall short. I’ll give an example. So, there’s a huge gender imbalance in engineering which favors males. Most rational people would not jump to the conclusion that the imbalance is a result of systemic bias. They would note that women aren’t as interested in engineering, for whatever reason. IQ doesn’t tell the full story there but other factors clue us in. Some people want the gender gap to be closed. They predominantly fall in the camp that believes that systemic bias is responsible for the imbalance. Analogously, the gap between Jews and gentiles in media representation is either systemic, some form of nepotism, or just other non-IQ factors, nebulous or not. This investigation ought to be conducted and it must inform our response to this “problem”.
so young and so naive. both you and the philosturbator.
imagine if the 2% of israelis who are christians owned the israeli media and 50% of its highest paid employees were christians? and all of its top management were christians? almost all of israel’s christians are arabs, btw.
Q1. why is this a problem?
Q2. why is this a problem in israel, but not in the US?
A1. because israel is a jewish state. the only one. if the media is as powerful in israel as it is in the US it ceases to be a jewish state. the jews have lost their right to self-determination.
A2. because the US is not a nation state. in the very beginning it was mostly british, but the revolution was a repudiation of british-ness. the antipodes still identify with being british to some extent. the US hasn’t since 1776.
that is…
If you’re going to fix the problem, establish that it is a real problem.
it’s a problem regardless of the cause darling squaw, because it is anti-democratic, anti-self-determination.
as peepee quotes me above…if any group is so powerful that one cannot speak of their power, this group is too powerful.
all 100+ cornerbacks in the nfl are black. sehorn was the last white. is that a problem? no. why? because cornerbacks have no power. who cares about cornerbacks?
the analogy to women in engineering would get you an F in my law school class.
men are not 2% of the population. women are not 98% of the population. there are plenty of female engineers and natscis.
It’s not enough to just cite the stats to assert that Jews control the media/insert x domain. One needs to do an investigation.
you couldn’t possibly be 23.
your profs know your papers because you always doodle native american shit on them.
They just want to go back to the 1950s and earlier when white men…
what a loser.
things were better in the 50s in many ways for most people than they are now. identity politics is just a distraction darling squaw.
women’s lib has had some horrible effects.
1. wages are lowered, because the workforce has doubled.
2. divorce rate peaks in 80s but still much higher. rates of illegitimacy are still going up.
3. the kids have to be raised in daycare and eat restaurant food, because there’s no one at home.
unfortunately the laudable goal of gender equal opportunity was just another distraction of the ruling class to fuck everyone else in the ass, and add “male chauvinists” to the list of deplorables, thus assuring the masters can go on sodomizing the population and never be called on it.
Dude, just a tip. Just because I argue one side of the issue doesn’t mean I don’t see your/the other side also. I anticipated the response that “it’s a problem regardless of the cause”.
Your argument assumes that the overrepresentation makes a difference (for example, in the broadcasted content) and i argue the jury is out on that. Please compare Jewish media to Gentile media for evidence. If you think neither the effect nor the cause matter, you’re not on Philosopher’s side. You’re simply saying Jews are too powerful not that they have some nefarious agenda.
1. wages are lowered, because the workforce has doubled.
– making slightly less money than what a man would have made had women not entered the workforce is better than making none. Try to see it from a woman’s perspective.
2. divorce rate peaks in 80s but still much higher. rates of illegitimacy are still going up.
– again, why has the divorce rate gone up? perhaps women put up with more shit in the 50s. Is that really better? Sacrifice women’s happiness to preserve the institution of marriage?
3. the kids have to be raised in daycare and eat restaurant food, because there’s no one at home.
– any stats on how kids are worse off now than they were in the 50s?
the analogy to women in engineering would get you an F in my law school class.
men are not 2% of the population. women are not 98% of the population. there are plenty of female engineers and natscis.
you couldn’t possibly be 23.
your profs know your papers because you always doodle native american shit on them.
– no analogy is perfect and mine had obvious flaws. However, the analogy was simply to illustrate that 1) Jewish overrepresentation may not be by design and 2) this makes/should make a difference in our assessment of both situations.
Your rebuttal is that it doesn’t matter which is fine but the analogy brought out this point of disagreement. In a way, it was a success.
Dude, just a tip. Just because I argue one side of the issue doesn’t mean I don’t see your/the other side also. I anticipated the response that “it’s a problem regardless of the cause”. just a tip squaw, before one anticipates an argument he must first understand it. you’ve done neither. and another: i suggest you have something to say, before saying something.
Your argument assumes that the overrepresentation makes a difference that’s exactly what it does NOT do. i would stick to powwows.
Mugabe is that asshole who uses offensive language on purpose to get under your skin.
Actually you didn’t understand my point. I said, if you don’t care about cause or effect, you’re not in the Philosopher’s camp. It was an invitation to make your position clear.
I do understand your argument. You claim that Jews having too much power is inherently bad because it’s anti-democratic and if it isn’t, it’s because America isn’t a nation state; it’s a bastard land. I’m not saying it’s wrong. There’s some merit to it. I’m not sure which side I’m on but there’s nothing wrong or stupid with articulating the opposite view.
a lesson still unlearnt. one cannot insist on the establishment of facts which cannot be established.
there is simply no way to establish that jewish ownership is worse. we all live in one universe. alternative universes are not available.
i do know that murdoch and that pro-wrestling guy are just as bad as any jewish media mogul. it doesn’t matter.
every colonial empire was resisted. eventually the colonies weren’t worth the trouble, and the white man’s burden was thrown off. but the expropriation of natural resources of the former colonies went ahead as fast as ever. the spanish empire fell in the early 19th c. then the europeans murdered each other for empire 1914-1918, only to give it all up by the 70s.
and then there were none?
that’s just what (((they))) want you to think.
self-determination of nations and peoples is recognized as a fundamental human right by the UN. it’s conveniently ignored for metropolitan france and britain…less so for portugal and spain. imagine if all the inhabitants of alexander’s empire immigrated to greece.
it could be that the jews are superhuman both intellectually and morally, and that their ascendancy is for the best. it could be. maybe. it could also be that the feudal lords were superior to the peasants and that plutocracy is the best form of government. maybe.
alan doucheowitz in his book The Vanishing American Jew says:
1. the over-representation of jews in various areas corresponds to the claims of anti-semites.
2. it doesn’t matter because jews don’t agree with each other and there’s no conspiracy.
thanks alan. i feel so much better now. why aren’t there any heterosexual priests? at a certain point a critical mass is reached and people who differ from the majority feel uncomfortable. are they deliberately made uncomfortable? no. that’s not necessary.
Can’t sleep…
Anyway an argument against Mugabe’s is that you cannot extend your “democracy” to the private industry. Let the market be the final arbiter.
What Mugabe doesn’t understand vis-a-vis “identity politics” is that it isn’t and wasn’t just a distraction for the millions who were left behind on the basis of their identities. For them, your tirades about Jews and masters are just a distraction. Mugabe’s achilles heel is his inability to step in another’s shoes.
Deal with it!, I think you’re too indecisive, diplomatic and influenceable for a future lawyer. This career requires confidence in your opinions and persuasiveness. But you may have time to work on that depending on your answers to my following two questions:
-how old are you ?
-how many years of law school have you completed ?
If the Jews were really good at media, as in let’s suppose they disseminated exactly what Mugabe likes, would he complain about their overrepresentation? That’s the test Mugabe needs to pass. He shouldn’t be able to respect himself if he can’t. If Mugabe knew 100 % that Jews are overrepresented because they are simply better than gentiles, would he argue against them? One doesn’t ignore such evidence if he possesses it; he ignores when he doesn’t.
In other words, it’s a strategic decision to make Mugabe’s argument but its actual, even if unintended, effect may be to deceive both others and oneself.
Mugabe thinks I have nothing to say because I’m effete but in my defence, I put the fête in effete.
Yes Mugabe I doodle Native American shit on my exams. Also, I just flutter my eyelashes and suck my professors’ dicks to get good grades. Just come right out and say it. Don’t be a coward; be high T like Philosopher. You insult like a coward.
Afrosapiens did you take a logic class in college? I took one. I enjoyed it but anything more than that is useless for me.
Check out this paper I found last night. Interesting, and it makes a lot of sense if you know what omega 3 fatty acids do.
Let me know what you think of this. Going to blog on it tonight.
“Afrosapiens did you take a logic class in college? I took one. I enjoyed it but anything more than that is useless for me.”
I took a logic class in prep school for the HEC admission concours. I liked it too, and just like you I found it useless after the concours but it was entertaining.
“Check out this paper I found last night. Interesting, and it makes a lot of sense if you know what omega 3 fatty acids do.
Let me know what you think of this. Going to blog on it tonight.”
Yes I’ve heard about omega 3. I don’t know about the US, but in France there has been a real frenzy about omega 3 a couple of years ago.
Your paper is really interesting, it implies men have evolved to love coke bottled shaped bodies as sexual selection for intelligence.
I’ve had macros and micros drilled into me so I know how crucial they are for proper brain growth. I gotta get new CEUs every few months to keep up on the latest in the field. So I know what different levels of macros and micros do in the body and how they affect the brain and body. Nutrition of the babe and mother are imperative to hit the genetic ceiling.
Afro in law school they teach us to argue all sides of an issue. They tell us to avoid being persuasive and to be predictive instead.
However you’re right that in practice, persuasiveness and confidence are important. The problem, if you will, is that I genuinely want to get to the bottom of the issue. Truth is worth the small price of hurting one’s ego.
It’s also true that I’m notoriously indecisive even in real life and am unconfident in my intellectual ability. My lack of confidence makes me act dumb to keep expectations low.
“Afro in law school they teach us to argue all sides of an issue.”
Yes, but that’s something you’re supposed to do in your preparation of your defense, you’re not supposed to show it to your adversary.
“The problem, if you will, is that I genuinely want to get to the bottom of the issue”
Alright, that’s OK on a blog, but you can’t do it in a court.
“My lack of confidence makes me act dumb to keep expectations low.”
I think the more you get through law school years, the more you’ll trust yourself knowing you achieved something few did.
Afrosapiens,
Intro to logic is great for constructing and deconstructing arguments. Putting premises with a conclusion is much simpler and much less to type/read and really gets to the root of what you’re saying. Choosing a premise or the conclusion and pointing out how it’s wrong really is the best way to go about debates, especially online.
“Yes I’ve heard about omega 3. I don’t know about the US, but in France there has been a real frenzy about omega 3 a couple of years ago.”
What kind of frenzy? American diets are deficient in omega 3s, but has too much omega 6s. Animal products have high amounts of omega 6s, but in the articles that I read today on the WHR/intelligence relationship, not one of them said that it’s in animal products who were fed diets high in corn so grass-fed animal products won’t have these high levels of omegas 6s.
DHA is one of the most important fatty acids and is needed for good brain health. It’s also one of the most important fatty acids during foetal development and during the first year of life. Fish oils with the right EPA/DPA ratio are great for brain health. There are so many f***ing benefits to fish oil, I don’t know why everyone doesn’t take them.
“Your paper is really interesting, it implies men have evolved to love coke bottled shaped bodies as sexual selection for intelligence.”
Yes. Omega 3s cannot be synthesized by the body so it can only come from diet. In the final months of a pregnancy, the fat stores start breaking down so the babe can get access to the fatty acids. This paper is solid. Along with the other paper, I see what you mean about the cold winter theory now. I’m starting to think that intelligence has tons more to do with sexual selection than cold winters.
Also the first born babe is the most intelligent in the family on average. What could be at work here is that the first born babe has more access to the omega 3/DPA than his siblings.
This theory makes so much sense. The authors wrote a book on this:
https://www.amazon.com/Why-Women-Need-Fat-Surprising/dp/1594630852
“Choosing a premise or the conclusion and pointing out how it’s wrong really is the best way to go about debates, especially online.”
Unfortunately, online debaters often have very little consideration for logic. Things we learn in logic classes are theoretical, we unconsciously apply them in workplace situation and we build our abilities with experience, same applies with business techniques. It’s kind of like driving lessons, we soon take some freedom the theoretical rules while still applying them because they intrinsically make sense but we also need to adapt to a variety of situations.
“What kind of frenzy? American diets are deficient in omega 3s, but has too much omega 6s.”
Positive frenzy, I was translating the french word “frénésie”, maybe it’s a false friend.
“Fish oils with the right EPA/DPA ratio are great for brain health. There are so many f***ing benefits to fish oil, I don’t know why everyone doesn’t take them.”
It’s been known for long, my father was in boarding school in the 60s and they gave kids one spoon of fish oil each morning. Governments should fortify foods with any nutrient known to be good for brain growth.
“I’m starting to think that intelligence has tons more to do with sexual selection than cold winters.”
It never made sense to me, I knew apes and early hominids could not migrate out of Africa because they weren’t fully bipedal which limited their ability to migrate and made them vulnerable in open terrains. But species like Homo Erectus have been living in northern Eurasia for thousands of years, yet homo sapiens comes from Africa.
Moreover, the northern ice age caused drought in the tropics forcing every population to seek refuge in pockets of wetter and milder climate. Behavioral modernity occurred in Africa before the Ice age and there is no archaeological sign that decreasing temperatures changed human behavior. In post ice-age era, the northern regions became temperate which made life much easier there than in the tropics, winter is nothing compared to 6 months of dry season. There are lots of reasons why I never believed in the cold winter theory and no one out of HBD does.
Sexual selection makes more sense, like any other Animal, humans are attracted to signs of fitness. There’s just one limitation to this theory, the fact that since the Neolithic, mating has been socially arranged and sexual selection through genuine attraction might have played a lesser role in evolution.
“Also the first born babe is the most intelligent in the family on average. What could be at work here is that the first born babe has more access to the omega 3/DPA than his siblings.”
Before you showed me that, I thought birth order difference in intelligence was due to age of parents, and more intensive providing on the first born. It’s a good thing that older children are more intelligent since they are supposed to act as substitutes to the parents in traditional societies.
Afrosapiens,
I’m dumb as bricks. Even on a blog, I’m out of my depth and surrounded by people smarter than me. That’s OK, so be it.
Lol, don’t be so harsh toward yourself. You chose to study law, so there’s a part of you that believes in your intelligence, otherwise you would have done something less challenging.
Let the market be the final arbiter.
yeah because “the market” is a natural phenomenon not a political construct. maybe. could be.
it isn’t and wasn’t just a distraction for the millions who…
you’re confusing making “the game” fairer with saying, “this game is bullshit! i’m not gonna play.”
thanks massa. thanks fo’ lettin’ me sleep in duh big house. you is such a good massa.
…let’s suppose they disseminated exactly what Mugabe likes, would he complain about their overrepresentation?
YES!
too low a level of abstraction fat injun-ness. it’s universalism vs particularism. “what Mugabe likes” is not a principle of government…the end of political struggle doesn’t come when one ideology is revealed that all see as obviously the best ideology possible…or when one ideology is “a boot stamping on a human face — forever”.
politics is NOT about ideas. it’s about a powerful minority enforcing its will OR it’s about agreement and contentment.
the end to politics comes when the govern-ors and the govern-ed agree without coercion or propaganda.
and because people are different such a final conclusion to politics is most likely to come about in fairly small homogeneous countries.
like norway!
If Mugabe knew 100 % that Jews are overrepresented because they are simply better than gentiles, would he argue against them?
YES!
and NOT because they are jews per se. i would “argue against” armenians, etc. too…if they had such a position.
but america and the americas are FUBAR. there’s no remedy for them. NONE! the US and Canada are rich because they both have absurd natural resources…most of all land, low population density…think about it…if japan or germany had no trade they would be poor…if the US and Canada had no trade…they’d get over it…they’d still be rich.
now think about it…
what if rather than media and high finance jews excelled at mechanical engineering or geology?
much less of an objection. maybe none.
i hope it’s obvious why.
as i’ve said before…i am on the philosturbator’s side to the extent that…
1. jews are responsible for things like the firing of rick sanchez and all it represents. if gentiles are not allowed to mention the truly obscene level of over-representation something is very wrong. unz’s article should have been discussed openly. steve shoe felt he could not mention the part of it about the jews, but could mention the part about the asians.
2. i believe, but i can’t prove, that jews and all groups of people will have more in common than a hodgepodge. obama’s cabinet was multi-ethnic, but the ivy league was absurdly over-represented. i expect these people have something in common other than the athletic conference to which their schools belong. i expect they think alike, and i expect they do NOT think like the people they supposedly serve.
Affirmative action should be based on class/income rather than race IMO.
I think it should be based on wealth, because the wealth gap summarizes social inequalities from the present and from the past in terms of money inheritance and lost income opportunities. And focusing on wealth at a moderately low threshold would basically allow non-whites only, including Asians, while making the questioning of affirmative action on racial grounds impossible.
oh good now i can post pictures.
How many accounts does Mug of Pee have? Get a life!
Put simply, barbarians gonna barbare.
Its not the crocodile in the paddle pool with the kids that’s ‘bad’.
Its the Zionist gamma sleazy vermin like janowicz who convinced the parents that crocodiles are good pets. And even more despicably, the kids that crocodiles are good pets in the most insane and garish way you could even dream of.
That image is almost a provocative insult to whites, almost daring them. Laughing at them. Almost saying:
“I control your minds. I control you academy. I control your women. Defy me.”
That’s the message I get.
Sane mothers, grandparents, teachers would not approve of that filth. Not just alt righters.
I saw another ad walking down the street the other day: a white woman surrounded by black guys mixing tapes, smoking and high fiving. The ad was for perfume.
Again, in a country with less than 3% blacks.
Its 1984, if you think about it.
An unmistakable PLAN. A final assault.
Now you know why Trump had so much passion from his base. Those people would have crawled over glass to vote for him. Perhaps even die for him to make america great again – when blacks were relegated to a sideshow in line with their 15% of the pop, and not a trojan horse for jews to guilt monger whites into submission.
And why Le Pen will do very well despite being a one issue politician.
The Necromancer must die.
The fraction of humanity that would support my cause is the vast majority of whites, and maybe most asians and hispanics. Without jews media and ‘education’, their Illusion fades.
Even with it, we have Trump, Brexit, Le Pen, Italy referendum and soon the end of the Bolshevik EU, mass media and the end of the SJW.
The storm and high watermark has passed. Obama’s presidency marks the end of the darkest chapter in Western history.
As with kek,from the darkness, comes great light.
You would be shocked at the mystical forces that operate in the world.
Can I get away from this idiotic may may in at least one website I use?
By the way, I don’t think Zion knows how much Asians support whites over blacks. If you think white rac-ism is bad. Try East Asian’s. They basically deport and ask questions later about whether Magic Negro was legal or not.
You can count on one hand the amount of legalised blacks in Japan every year. No joking.
There are more billionaires in China than refugees.
There are 300.000 refugees in China, are there 300.000 billionaires in China ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_refugee_population
You can say whatever you want about Asians but they’re not that much into lynching, colonizing, enslaving or far right politics.
You definitely need to take your pills, sleep, and learn to be a real man, not a fag who’s scared to approach women and can’t take care of himself when facing danger. People see weakness, you don’t get randomly mugged, you attract muggers by looking like a victim.
I never said I was mugged you aa hire virtue signal token goon.
I never said I had an AA problem. Well actually, yes, in relation to blacks who approach police officers arresting them or their cousins and have the highest rape rates of all races. Hahahahaha.
I guess the highest rate of rape is among the Inuits, rape stats are off the chart in Nunavut and Greenland.
You have approach anxiety, you have it so much that you take the lack of it for psychopathy and low impulse control.
No, one defines psychopathy according to Hare’s checklist, not what Afrosapiens thinks. http://www.amren.com/news/2008/08/race_and_psycho/
Hum, this is a link to Lynn the scam artist, not a psychiatric scientific paper.
Gainsbourg’s parents must want to overdose. Just wretched and humiliating.
A simple question: do you support honor killings? Surely when your daughter dates a black guy, right? Just yes or no.
If my daughter did that I would rip off her head.
pp, what do you think was the iq of the smartest neanderthal and why didn’t you write anything about pisa?
I have to think about Neanderthals. What about PISA?
So looking at Mark Brandt’s new study on prejudice and IQ he finds something I told you and Pumpkin McCensorship Person.
– ALL PEOPLE ARE PREJUDICED NO MATTER WHAT THEIR IQ, ONLY THE SUBJECT OF THE PREJUDICE CHANGES WITH IQ
So high IQs hate religious people, businesspeople and millitary/police, whilst low IQ hate gays, blacks and so on.
What Marky Brandt might want to consider in his next study is taking serum testosterone levels and looking at high iq blacks in particular.
People with higher IQs tend to have lower testosterone and survival instinct and vice versa. Hence the openness to gays which appeal to effeminacy but which are a reproduction and tribal warfare dead end.
But this also explains why blacks, no matter what their IQ, hate gays – their testosterone wont countenance it. Survival in Detroit and Kinshasa is a literal jungle every day.
Ever notice the way the most rac-ist anti-gay whites are of Celtic descent by the way – Trumpy, hillbillies, Mel Gibson, Bannon, and half the US police force/FBI have a lot in common.
Shylock hates St Patrick’s Day, and JFK was the last president to defy the Deep State.
Trump is our first Celtic ancestry president since JFK. Both warriors.
Autism is the parody of high IQ where many aspies lean disproportionately homo. I’ve never met an engineer/programmer against gays. And I never will.
BUT IF WE WUK HAD AND PLAY FAIR NO BODY WILL HUT USS AND IF THEY DO WELL STOP PLAYING BASEBALL WITH THEM.
Can I be unmoderated. I’ve said everything I want to say on treasonous vile sinister and evil media control last night.
Hate is low IQ.
Rationnality is high IQ.
Les cis-tra veulent que jretourne au bled (pute!).
Un compatriote ?
Or one of Mugabe’s aliases ?
Neither, why ?
You’re apparently a fluent French slang speaker with some Mugabe-like prose.
Blacks are more likely to be gay.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/03/28/down-low-bruthas/
That’s a very interesting piece you wrote there. My suspicion is the poll may have been doctored as Gallup also finds most people support open borders http://www.gallup.com/poll/1660/immigration.aspx. But there’s something to what you write. I note a lot of black male celebs are claimed to be closeted gays. You’d be surprised at the rumours.
I hate to break it to you bud but not everyone is as much of a cuck as you
PumpkinPerson I would like to see you write about this article.
Notice the way AA was invented to frack out the whites from the police and government more generally.
(((They))) really are smarty little critters ain’t they.
Before that cops handed their jobs to their sons and buddies – all Irish lads. I had to laugh the way every cop in Twilight Zone had a tacky Irish accent, or more generally even today detectives and cops in ‘tough’ neighbourhoods have Irish ancestry.
http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/p__/images/3/30/Jimmy-mcnulty.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20130618140102&path-prefix=protagonist
Maverick cop. I love this guy.
Although I also liked Herc’s character a lot
“Beat them up first. Ask questions after your beat them up. Then beat them up again.”
“Let’s go in there and crack some heads”
Heheheheh. That’s the way policing should be done.
I genuinely think most cops feel like they’re in celtic warrior mode, because most of the perps are not white and its easy to get into that mindset then. Its pretty obvious being a cop nowadays is tantamount to being a soldier, except pols have chosen to bring the battlefield among civvies and actively invite in barbarians.
Without the police, I guarantee America would have had a civil war by now. Police see depraved stuff we aren’t even aware of.
Except Marlo Stanfield and Avon Barksdale were way more badass than any of the cops
Nah. Herc’s the man. Marlo was a straight up psychopath, no fun!!
I remember one of my middle school teachers who was Jewish reprimanded an East Asian classmate with aspirations in becoming a firefighter, calling it an occupation for losers – or what Lion would call prole. Strangely enough, this guy did become a firefighter among a sea of working class Irish proles and enjoys his job very much, learning this after attending a reunion a few years ago. Had he listened to his teacher, he would be another East Asian trying to swim against the tide among Jews in many of the prestigious “White Collar” occupations, where he has no chance.
Never believe the hype that Jews were kept out in low down jobs reserved only for gentile proles, the same reason why they were kept out of farming in the Old Continent.
Mr Obama, remember, was a symbol of change as well as its agent: not just a black president but the harbinger of a demographic shift that will relegate non-Hispanic whites to a minority in the country by the middle of the century . In 2009 talk-show hosts ranted about black retribution. Many people told pollsters they were afraid—a fear which, in a generous interpretation, has always been an inverted form of guilt.
The bloodshed that followed emancipation in the 19th century, and that accompanied the civil-rights movement of the 20th, suggests a backlash was unavoidable. That halting pattern, which retards but does not cancel progress, may have been on Mr Obama’s mind when he spoke, after November’s election, of the zig and zag of American history. As Reverend William Barber, a latter-day civil-rights leader in North Carolina, says of reactionary schemes to rig his state’s voting rules: “A dying mule kicks the hardest.” Sometimes it kicks very hard indeed.
– Lord Rotschild’s Economist
http://www.economist.com/news/christmas-specials/21712062-barack-obamas-presidency-lurched-between-idealism-and-acrimony-some-his
Just those small little words are all I need to know what Zion wants. Note how demo shifts are hard to predict and often don’t happen due to government intervention. Zion thinks it will defeat Trumpism. I would rather die than live in a world where Zion has finally destroyed its host.
“Mule”. Interesting word choice.
Reminds me of the mule in 1984. And it reminds them too.
Mule in Animal Farm#
A more general comment of Obama is that he was a good president. I take a lot of flack for that viewpoint from other alt-righters. But his presidency is unmistakably and positive one in terms of economic, environmental, social protection for the poor and infrastructure/education policies.
The dark ages of obama’s presidency I refer to were the social forces and turbulence his rise gave succor to in Zionist media, black behaviours, and the push for open borders by corporates (which Obama abetted under lobbying, having been a record deporter of illegals initially).
Obama did the best he could with some very high IQ psychopaths opposing him like the people the Economist owner pals around with in Knightsbridge. The Iran Deal is very significant, Cuba, START II, China climate deal, getting out of Iraq, and killing millitary spending.
Its a miracle his foreign policy wasn’t completely controlled by (((neocons))).
Eco – A (best since Truman or Johnson, maybe FDR)
Env – A
For Pol – B (he had really entrenched neocons up against him, so anything he got, he really fought for)
Criminal Justice/Dom Security – E (pot legalisation is good, shutting down private prisons good,open borders/NSA 1984 bad)
Social Policy – D
Overall a weak B
George Bush – F
Clinton – C
GH Bush – E
Reagan – D (although he had the opposite where society flowered)
Ford – C
Nixon – C (Our last openly anti semitic president got deposed in a CIA coup)
Johnson C
Kennedy – B (killed by Allen Dulles)
Eisenhower – B
Truman – B
FDR – A
Hoover – E
Wilson – C (but he was blackmailed by Zion according to Goldman Sachs daughter)
TR – A+++++++++
So maybe top 20-25% of 20th C presidents. I’m leaving out a few of the less notables.
Because his personal ethics and non-corrupt behaviour is good, I’d rate him top 15% overall. He is a remarkably uncorrupt president, leaving aside Wall Street campaign donations…which he rebuked with Dodd Frank, massive DOJ fines and the CPB.
Lion thinks his fellow Jews are the most talented people that walked this planet, when in fact, it’s the contrary. Whites have done everything and more.
Jews would not be able to survive on their own with others. Israel imports thousands of South East Asian workers to help grow its food, because Jews aren’t adept in food production. Its construction industry is also shoddy, and Israel needs foreign companies help build its infrastructure. That’s a fact.
Lion also thinks owners of construction companies are synonymous with the proles whom we are disparaging, hence the reason why very few Jews own construction companies.
Jews are 16 millions, and very dispersed. White are more than 1 billion.
We’re talking about talent and ability, not numbers.
Jews are not versatile as a people.
They are found in all industries, but are severely weak in visual IQ related tasks, hence their lack of representation in construction, utilities, craft making, and civilization-maintenance. Notice the Yakov commenter on his blog who is allegedly a Rusky Jew, and works in HVAC. He talks like a dilettante when it comes to his work.
And the comments here have been addressed in the past that Jews have slower reaction times – despite having a higher IQ. Reaction times should be correlated with visual IQ and the ability to perform using one’s visual abilities.
Number matters. You will find a greater number of talented people in a huge population than in a small one. Seems obvious.
Jews are good at a few industries, and in these few industries they aren’t even the best of the best. Jews dominate the law profession, but in terms of prestige, they aren’t over-represented in “White Shoe” firms.
A few of the top notch academics whom I’ve encountered aren’t even Jews. Jews want to push for more than they deserve, and this is the reason for their success. Honestly, many talented Whites just don’t care, because of White superiority.
One could make a case that Orthodox Christians (Greeks, Lebanese and Syrians) and Armenians, who are fewer in numbers than Jews, are more of an asset to America than Jews are. And the reason is their versatility. They’re also nicer than Jews. Jews tend to occupy parasitic industries and they do it in large numbers.
And these ethnic groups in America on average are just as wealthy as Jews.
So you see, these ethnic groups could act like Jews and start pushing their agenda aggressively at the expense of others. Greek Americans could whine about the past atrocities done by Turks and ask Washington to start a war. The Armenians have done something of this sort to recognize the Turkish atrocities, but they don’t push hard than they should. The same applies to the Lebanese and the Syrian Christians who could push their agendas to topple certain Muslim dictators in their homeland. Jews have no boundaries and they are always pushing hard for more than they deserve.
These groups are dumber than Jews in average. Jews are the most successful and they happen to have the highest IQ. These groups are also very tribal (possibly more than Jews). Middle Easterners are more tribal than Ashkenazis (see Jayman on clanishness).
And PP: This French Canadian blogger writes better than all of us, including Lion:
https://angryfrenchguy.com/2008/08/25/6-myths-about-mcgill-and-concordia/
This goes to show you that Anglo Proles suck at their own language. Forget about verbal IQ for a moment.
Hate is prole JS.
What is Afrosapiens IQ ?
PP, what is the average IQ of pornstars ?
You should write an article on the average IQ of different professions.
Pumpkin Person you said that verbal spatial and mathematical can all be seen as different IQ categories? But all connected to (g).
Since computer programming is mathematical would you be able to tell someones IQ from the complexity of computer programs they can make?
https://deepmind.com/
Programming computers in not my job and it is only a hobby yet I do think I would be better at it if it were something I did all the time.
https://illuminaticatblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/21/recurrent-neural-net/
https://illuminaticatblog.wordpress.com/2016/12/21/deep-reinforcement-learning/
So I’m reading this book now and it says Frege made an amazing breakthrough by saying a predicable sentence with a semantic title e.g. [‘Jim’ is a man], necessarily means the something referred to is always a concept .
This is why modern philosophy should ban autists from studying it.
I guess the next step is to define ‘concept’ in a set of predicable sentences. And we get a into a endless regression problem.
Frege was a mathematician. No surprise.
About as surprising as Janowitz McBolshevik Jew posting that dirt on Huffpo.
The author then tersely notes that positivism and empiricism fails because we can’t word hypothesis accurately enough.
WHAT. THE .FUCK are they teaching kids these days?!!
“Why is that on kids shows….what the hell is that?!”
Sean young could write a better philosophy book than Frege by the sounds of it.
When that guy on Lion’s blog criticising Kripke called modern philosophy legal studies I burst out laughing.
I bet “Concept is a _” makes Santo’s head explode.
Mugabe and the Philosopher are both right. I’m dumb and Idk how I managed to do well on the LSAT and in law school. I feel like the dumbest person at my law school. My friends and family make dumb blonde jokes about me. Not blonde but their equivalent.
I’ll just watch all you smarty pants argue from the sidelines.
Do you feel overwhelmed by cognitive tasks in your daily life ?
You could be just very young.
If you asked me to comment on anything at age 21, I would sound much less capable as well.
Truthfully, have you lied about your LSAT?
I’m 23.
Afrosapiens- I don’t know what you mean but I always did well in school.
No I haven’t lied about my LSAT score and was actually disappointed when I got my score because my practice test scores were higher.
I also got a perfect 170 on GRE Verbal somehow.
Damn you! I was i question short. I’m so jealous. (I’m not kidding)
*I was 1 question
I bombed the Math section though. Got only 162.
I scored 161. We’re almost the same person.
What’s your LSAT score? I have a feeling I’m only going to get in the mid-160s when I get my results back.