For years it’s been known that Jews have some of the lowest crime rates of any ethnic or racial group. Jewishvirtuallibrary.org reports:
However it’s well known that crime decreases as a function of socio-economic status and IQ (especially verbal IQ) and given that Jews in Western countries rank high on both of these variables, it might be argued that their apparent law abidingness is just a function of these other traits.
Thus when I stumbled upon a list of extremely rich Americans who had trouble with the law, I was intrigued because such a list, by definition, largely controls for economic variation. In their book ALL THE MONEY IN THE WORLD, Peter Bernstein and Annalyn Swan studied everyone who has ever appeared on Forbes magazine’s authoritative list of the 400 richest Americans from 1982 to 2007 and find at least 16 got in trouble with the law. Upon reading the list of names, what jumped out at me was that just over half of the 16, (56%) were Jewish.
Of course this doesn’t prove all that much because it’s long been known that Jews are hugely overrepresented among the Forbes 400, with some sources claiming they’re about a third of the list, however it’s interesting that among the tiny subset who had trouble with the law, their percentage increases from a third to over half. Of course given the small sample size, this result is probably not statistically significant.
Nonetheless if merely controlling for wealth can cause their crime rate to go from low to not low, I wonder what controlling for both wealth and verbal IQ would do.
illuminaticatblog said:
Verbal intelligence requires or is prone to more than reading but happens to be an internal dialogue or theory of mind. So when we view people by what we witness as verbal intelligence we are getting a glimpse into others minds, specifically Gods mind because the word was God and was with God. This is a message that was transfered generation to generation by the breath of God. As in the hebrew tradition 4 layers of interpretation must be used to read the holy book. Those people who spoke Gods ways passed on to the next what was important. Gods ways are supposed to be moral.
Reading the tradition, speaking the tradition, living the tradition, all comes to knowing God. God spoke to abraham. Adam named the animals. Words are how God created the universe. So knowing a word, its connotations, its context, its scripts, these bare with them the mental realities of the world.
And knowing mental realities is about feeling the other person. You can read the book and feel nothing, or you can grasp it in the center of your being. This was the person who did the action in the lands for the purposes resulting in the consequences. What comes next then is the anticipation the following, what will God do? That becomes the story and we follow the story to see what is next and to do what comes next ourselves by example where God would lead us.
That too is to relate to the people in the story. because everyone knew the people before them. They all knew the references and characters. And pass on this to the people what mattered most. The lessons the the most faithful students kept. because as a heritage it belongs to the ones who keep it.
language as a mechanism,
Still requires belief.
Med said:
I don’t think it’s verbal IQ alone. It’s a unique feature of Jews to prefer parasitic strategies with out-group hostility. Even with high verbal IQ of other racial groups, they are not as overrepresented in white-collar crime. I saw somewhere Jews are overrepresented in financial crimes, just like Friedman FX exchange or whatever that was.
The Philosopher said:
Puppys logical reasoning is in the toilet. Theres a massive problem with a ‘list of law breakers in the forbes 400 who are jews’.
The real number of jews as criminals if they were all caught for their crimes would be something like 60%+ of billionaires despite being 40% of billionaires.
You and I both know the reason why jews are more prone to criminality (of the non violent sort). But you wont print it because it clashes with your social justice beliefs.
pumpkinperson said:
Rich people can hire the best lawyers. Incarceration rates are basically zero for a billionaire as a result, even if they do the crime.
Jews run the judicial and legal system e.g. Epstein got a slap on the wrist in the first trial for being a child trafficker.
Jews have the IQ levels to not be caught more than gentiles or heaven forbid, black billionaires (lol).
The whole point of my article is that you need to control for money and IQ. I was able to at least control largely for money.
The real number of jews as criminals if they were all caught for their crimes would be something like 60%+ of billionaires despite being 40% of billionaires.
Can you read? That’s roughly what I found.
LOADED said:
PP do you enjoy the statistical reasonings that you find or is it that you see a way out of them.
are statistics the most informationally important topic.
pumpkinperson said:
I think they’re an incredibly powerful tool. Look at Chat GPT. They got a computer to have conversations like a human just by studying the statistics of how we combine words. Amazing what can be done with statistics!
The Philosopher said:
Obviously puppy wants to go on with this fiction that jews and blacks are just as law abiding and civilised as goyim or east asians. We all have to sit here and listen to children’s stories.
pumpkinperson said:
No I believe there are AVERAGE genetic differences between most ethnic groups on most traits, but there is VASTLY more trait variation WITHIN ethnic groups than there is BETWEEN them so judge people as individuals, not by group membership.
sadly said:
blacks are gentiles peepee, as are hindu dindus and camel jockeys and pakis and chinapipo etc.
peepee uses goyim to mean wypipo because racist. sad.
pumpkinperson said:
Pill makes that mistake because he overgeneralized, kind of like a toddler who calls all women mother.
LOADED said:
Pill uses extreme rhetoric because that’s the only way you can reach these people unfortunately
I think PP uses precise factual arguments in making a point so one is a quick strategy and the other is more endurable in the long run!
The Philosopher said:
It would be very very interesting to study the Israeli legal system and how it has adapted to a [redacted by pp, 2025-05-01] population. I bet the legal statutes are 50% longer than gentile ones.
Financial regulations must be an entire library.
pumpkinperson said:
Remember when Israel tricked your favorite “social genius” into killing an Iranian General by pretending they were doing it with him, & then after he did it Israel denied all involvement. HAHAHAHA! Trump is still smarting over that.
Fraz said:
hmm, I agree with that in principle, if you know the person you are dealing with, but the conducts of certain groups are so dangerous that they warrant behavior modulation in dealing with them in general.
pumpkin, I have a question: do you read Emile Kierkegaard? He’s very similar to you in a lot of ways, doing similar analysis and stuff, and I did his reader survey, and he does manipulations in the IQ section. He considers sat scores and then claims that the .8 correlation with iq means that there will be regression to the mean and thus most of the internet iq charts are overblown, does something with z scores, and then puts a fairly low ceiling on sat predictability. Anyway, I thought this was interesting, but it seems to me that if incomplete correlation is used to claim a regression to the mean, then there is actually not complete correlation among the different clinical IQ tests is there? For example, I found a study that showed only .4 to .8 correlation between rpm and wais, with most studies showing lower correlations. I cursorily reviewed the other literature, and there was discussion that there is low correlation between the different tests, and that the degree of correlation actually changes with IQ range being lower on the high and low ends. I was wondering what you thought of all this.
Bruno said:
Philo, Pumpkin just gave numbers that show rich Jews are 100 % more likely to be criminal than Goyim.
I’ll explain it to you with baby words:
if 1/3 represent half the criminals, it means this one third do as much crime as the other two thirds, so they are twice as much criminal as the rest.
It’s not relevant to use the average as it is skewed by the Jews average.
So your 60% proposal is far beyond Pumpkins result of 100% more criminal.
i would say that in France Jews are 30 times over-represented compared to the average (they are two small to skew it) among rich and influential persons (20% versus 0,65%) and almost 150 times (50%) compared to the rest among the rich & convicted people.
illuminaticatblog said:
You are using percentages and ratios wrong.
How do you prove 100 percent of rich jews are criminals well also proving less than 100 percent of non jews who are rich are criminals.
That can’t be done with your faulty logic.
Pumpkin already said the sample was too small.
This sample is of billionaires and we would not know who was a criminal or not of all billionaires. (jew and non jew because they all have lawyers)
Then we would need to look at all the millionaires. (jew and non jew)
The Philosopher said:
You know anytime Bruno writes a comment longer than a paragraph I really struggle to understand what the hell hes saying.
I can understand Santo much better because I get this gist of his jibe. With Bruno hes missing a lot of key words you need to form sentences or using the opposite words to what I think he wants to argue.
Keep in mind he said he would explain it like a baby.
You even made a logical error. Like Puppy said its the same ratio we were both implying. But Puppy thinks the Forbes is 30% jewish. I think its minimum 40%. If you include crypto jews, maybe 50%.
The Philosopher said:
Yeah anime caught the same thing.
Sometimes when you explain a math problem in words it looks completely different to the math problem as an equation and the verbal reasoning can ‘cloud’ the math reasoning. Monthy Hall problem.
testingsiteword said:
Never heard of the Jewish Mafia? They are present in every corner of the world, and they commit all kinds of crimes, including trafficking children and forcing them into prostitution.
But when you classify Australoids (Indians), Austronesians and even some Caucasoids as “Asians”, obviously the statistics will be distorted. Not to mention crypto Jews.
illuminaticatblog said:
mafias exist in all cultures so it is more about the average jew controlled for IQ and the rate of offence in different areas of society.
It might be that higher IQ (125 – 140) has higher crime for any population group. Just as with the lower IQ persons.
The middle of the bell curve slight above and below average has alway been a steady state on allot of things. Where the extreme ends have more in common.
I really cannot read the fine print pp presents so I cannot tell the hard numbers. pp just needs more charts, because that would give real answers.
pumpkinperson said:
If you click on the screen shot, it should pop up in another window allowing you to read it.
illuminaticatblog said:
From what I am reading, above average IQ is associated with doing less crime involving physical violence.
That makes sense for two reasons.
impulse control, more intelligent people do not get angry as much and or act on their impulses. this is the same reason for not drinking and not smoking.
seeing the consequences of their actions, why bother stealing when you can get things the honest way with the intelligence you have. most people of lower intelligence would not know what else to do to get what they need other than violence.
but off course as pill sees it, impulse control and honesty are autistic traits. You need to be socially intelligent when you are not cognitively intelligent to take advantage of others. You also drink and smoke.
To me the opposite of autisms is not social intelligence as pill thinks it is, I call it ADHD. because ADHD is anything bellow 100 IQ points. You drink you smoke you have 9 credit cards and you go to parties.
As pill sees it the ADHD person is superior.
illuminaticatblog said:
pill would call me inferior because I do not have a venereal disease. (no sex with 12 people)
Name said:
testingsite, Indians are Australiaoid? Go to India sometime and see for yourself.
Also see what an Australoid brain didhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07386-0
The head of google search is an Indian too.
LOADED said:
they look australoid which is proof enough
The Philosopher said:
I think racism should be taught in schools. If I was a dictator I would force all the kids to do a mandatory 100 course on jews.
pumpkinperson said:
No people should not be taught antisemitism. They should be taught about the Israel lobby and the diversity lobby and that both lobbies have been started/dominated by Jews for largely ethnocentric reasons, but there are MILLIONS of Jews who oppose these lobbies and millions of Gentiles who support them, so antisemitism is both morally and strategically bankrupt in my opinion.
The Philosopher said:
It wouldn’t be called ‘antisemitism class’ or ‘nazi ideology class’ dumbass. It would be called HBD theory.
Basically Rushton would be a key reading. McDonald would be a key reading.
You could even call it ‘jewish studies’.
You would have to mention the IQs and the dark triad traits. Definitely. But you would use your social justice Stephen Gould language about diversity being more within races than between them (which is a logical fallacy in many ways).
pumpkinperson said:
How is it a logical fallacy? Jews seem more likely to have high IQ & dark triad, but millions of Jews have neither and millions of whites have both, and Jew in this video has low IQ and dark triad:
pumpkinperson said:
The Israel lobby goes to great lengths to frame any criticism of Israel as antisemetic, and like an idiot, you fall right into their trap.
The Philosopher said:
Yes teaching HBD is ‘antisemetic’. 100% agree. Thats why your website also got you banned. You either accept it or you become a dumb goyim. Make your choice.
“How is it a logical fallacy?”
Basic verbal reasoning would classify it as sophistry more than a logical argument to dismiss HBD. Its like just saying “well everyone is different”…its technically true but the between group differences explain 90% of world history and the within group differences explain 2%. Its assinine. Its exactly what I would satirise a jew as saying openly to HBD arguments.
pumpkinperson said:
Yes teaching HBD is ‘antisemetic’. 100% agree.
There’s no doubt the HBD-o-sphere has a large anti-semetic white nationalist faction, but it also has a large philosemetic faction. Charles Murray is the darling of neoconservative Think Tanks, Greg Cochran’s theory gets glowing coverage in the New York Times, and of course many prominent HBDer like Richard Herrnstein, Michael Hart, Lion of the Blogosphere, Aimy Wax, Peter Frost, Ron Unz and Stepen Pinker, Michael Levin, Daniel Seligman,Sam Harris are themselves Jewish or Jewish adjacent (Jensen).
Having said that, Jews are also the ones who led the movement to marginalize HBD in the first place.
What you have to understand is that the organized Jewsish community is divided into two main factions: The Israel Lobby and The Diversity Lobby. The Diversity Lobby is then sub-divided into three main factions: the moral true believers, the capitalist virtue signalers, and the anti-white racissts. Similarly, the Jews in the Israel lobby can be divided into the liberal zionist, the neocons and the anti-Arab racists. None of these groups are mutually exclusive.
Thats why your website also got you banned.
Hopefully it doesn’t come to that, but I’ve likely been downgraded in the algorithm. All alternative media has been, though HBD blogs more than most
its technically true but the between group differences explain 90% of world history and the within group differences explain 2%. Its assinine. Its exactly what I would satirise a jew as saying openly to HBD arguments.
What’s asinine is treating everyone in a group as if they were the same. The neocons exploited that kind of stupidity to drag Americans into Iraq, even though they had nothings to do with 9/11 because people like you thought all Arabs are the same.
It’s also morally wrong because you’re blaming innocent people for actions they had nothing to do with, just because of their race which they have no control over. That kind of collective punishment mentality helps the Gaza genocide.
Lurker said:
It’s kind of a logical fallacy to state there is more variation between groups for one reason being that human beings work in groups and collectives rather than as individuals. (Of course you could extend that to humanity at large and the whole environment/planet, then the solar system, etc., but the point remains that human beings are still separate creatures from alligators, and different races are separate because of the different genetic pools) Men and women work together (at least in theory) despite great differences, and the same with adults and children.
A population can handle a certain amount of ambient psychopathy or parasitism, but too much could probably only be maintained when utilized against an even larger population.
What might be also important to teach is the tenets of Judaism or the Talmud, or wherever Zionists get their main supremacist views from. In conjunction with, or maybe prior to, the genetic changes, personality changes, or specific cultural practices/beliefs Jews have would be their religious beliefs.
Of course you could study the good parts of Jewish practices and achievements, but then that would righftully open the way for studying the good parts of Nazism, or colonialism, etc. that is traditionally maligned by our culture and education system.
LOADED said:
violence and crime comes in all forms. Look at war as an example of this or any other behavior that intrudes on another’s life!
this is why I think crime and specifically its measurements etc cannot be a justifiable measure of how people behave in ways that we see or may not see them doing…
although I’d agree that if there is consistent behavior of a group of people acting on common interests that it would justify labeling the group as being this certain way
there’s gotta be a good way of predicting how groups behave in certain areas of the world so that the statistics shows phenomenon that occur
illuminaticatblog said:
Nazism was a return to paganism.
Very occult practices.
Hitler channeled wotan as the spirit of the German people.
It was not so much good or bad as it was something hitler though could replace Christian values.
But it could not because paganism is based on local gods, Judaism and Christianity are monotheisms.
God is sovereign over all, a universal force.
That is why colonialism mostly was christian.
Enslavement was economical not religious.
Yet to replace pagan deities was just a fight over mono vs poly. – any poly god killed another poly god. because a tribes god would be strong or weak. but a mono god was strongest of all. so any cultural damage was many small gods fighting each other vs GOD. who was in most basic terms, a god who died for the worlds sins. a true universal.
The Philosopher said:
Most of the those jews you named in the HBD sphere dont acknowledge HBD publicly. Pinker and Harris have mentioned it in passing and in very subtle terms. Frost isn’t a jew.
HBD is basically a banned topic because of jews otherwise it would possibly be standard on anthro and biology cirricula.
Treating a group as a group is what it is. If you wanted to find the best mathematicians you would sent scouts to china. If you want the best runners, send them to kenya and so on.
pumpkinperson said:
Most of the those jews you named in the HBD sphere dont acknowledge HBD publicly. Pinker and Harris have mentioned it in passing and in very subtle terms.
Pinker endorses HBD when it comes to Jewish IQ > White iQ but not when it comes to White IQ > Black IQ. LOL. But Amy Wax has risked her reputation and endured years of persecution for speaking out loudly and repeatedly in defense of HBD & against affirmative action & immigration.
Frost isn’t a jew.
How would you know?
HBD is basically a banned topic because of jews otherwise it would possibly be standard on anthro and biology cirricula.
I agree, but it’s morally wrong to blame all Jews for that. It’s morally wrong to blame all members of any race for anything. Blame people for what they do, not for what they are.
Treating a group as a group is what it is.
But we’re human beings, capable of of moral thought, not dumb apes who attack all members of the rival troop.
If you wanted to find the best mathematicians you would sent scouts to china.
But I wouldn’t reject Ramanujan because he’s Indian
If you want the best runners, send them to kenya and so on.
So should Yao Ming be banned from the NBA because most East Asians suck at basketball?
The Philosopher said:
Funnily enough I dont think asians suck at b-ball. Its mainly a height thing.
In rugby about 20% of the top players are pacific island people who are 0.0000000000001 of the world population and its mainly because of size.
pumpkinperson said:
Well, Pacific Islanders are not East Asian,n even if they are part of the greater Mongoloid grade.
As far your other comment about good members of “bad” races still carrying “bad” genes (for certain traits); all that means is that the first generation of their progeny would regress to a worse mean, but they never fully regress. For example, if you exiled all the tallest Chinese people to a secluded island, in one generation you’d have a new ethnic group that made White Americans look like midgets.
Lurker said:
I respect jews who call out other jews as long as they aren’t anti-White, communist, liberal (LBGTQIA+ loving) anti-traditional, anti-globalism etc.
It’s also easier to “risk your life” for your beliefs and get beaten by the police when you have the system on your side, one way or another. It’s like the criticism of Jesus as sacrificing himself, which is not a “real sacrifice” because Jesus was God/sent by God.
Of course there are jews who point out Zionism and other jews. The kvetching never stops…
The jews that do some amount of manual labor, aren’t dual-citizens, stay out of the limelight and refrain from making mass revolutionary/subversive criticism, etc. are probably the ones you could safely say are good people (assuming they aren’t obviously evil in other ways).
LOADED said:
so you don’t want Jews being successful?
Lurker said:
They should be successful if they can also take responsibility for their failures. (Many don’t it seems)
The same as everyone.
The Philosopher said:
I think dark triad is a dominant gene. It would make a lot of sense if it was. Somehow Bernie and Marianne are fine but you get a significant chance one of their kids is going to be a pornographer or some sort of con man.
pumpkinperson said:
That might make sense if dark triad traits were binary like brown eyes vs blue eyes where two brown eyed parents can have a blue-eyed kid if they come from a blue eyed race, but virtually no parent from a brown eyed race will have a blue eyed kid, but when you’re talking about complex traits like IQ, height, and presumably dark triad, these things exist along a spectrum, so if both parents are at one extreme of the spectrum, the kids will average between the parents and the racial mean. So for example, blacks parents with IQs above 150 will have smarter kids than the average Jewish parents do, but not as smart as the children of Jewish parents above 150. See the breeder’s equation.
Name said:
That is why you are not a dictator.
LOADED said:
and that’s why you are if you catch the drift
The Philosopher said:
LIke I said 2 months ago. If you look at the economics of Israel. Its not a viable entity without tribute from USA and Europe. It would have the debt grade of Pakistan if the USA and Europe didnt exist.
The Philosopher said:
The jews lack a written constitution because it would be so painfully embarrassing admitting they were fascists and didn’t believe in seperation of church and state and didn’t believe in equal rights for every citizen regardless of race and that they claimed massive chunks of territory from other countries.
100% real talk.
The Philosopher said:
Do you believe in good and evil Puppy? I’m talking non religious. Because you basically never act like it.
pumpkinperson said:
I find certain behavior very morally distasteful: pedophilia, animal cruelty, war crimes, genocide etc. I have no problem calling them evil, for want of a better word.
The Philosopher said:
So why do you keep banning me when I call what is happening in Gaza a genocide? You are basically siding with the murderers.
pumpkinperson said:
Because you often do it in such a way that spreads hate against all Jews which is not fair to all the brave Jewish kids (and older Jews) who are standing shoulder to shoulder with the anti-war protesters, many of whom have even been arrested and injured by police. It’s not fair to Jews like Max Blumenthal who have been exposing Zionists for years:
The Philosopher said:
Month Hall problem is what the jew Daniel Kahneman classified as a cognitive bias more than a math problem.
Puppy have you noticed how jews totally dominate psychology? I can’t think of an area more dominated by jews. Maybe finance?
Pingback: House of Representatives wants to outlaw the Bible and the First Amendment to prevent any and all speech that Israel does not enjoy | vulture of critique
The Philosopher said:
If 2 engineers have a baby with autism does that prove autism is a ‘dominant gene’ or is it that high math IQ just craters social IQ into the ground at certain levels?
pumpkinperson said:
The children of most engineers are LESS autistic than their parents because regression to the mean, but they’re more likely to be autistic than non-engineer parents.
The Philosopher said:
Puppy wont admit having a high math IQ craters social intelligence. Look I’ll be frank. i wasn’t great at socialising as a kid either compared to other kids. Anyone even reasonably good at math gets the penalty even if they lean verbal or schiz. Its actually quite interesting that jews evolved past it.
illuminaticatblog said:
math is a narrow focus of vision on manipulation of symbols
social you need to observe people and anticipate what they do which make you use vision in a broad focus.
the first is about simple shapes in working memory(inward focus)
the second is about fluid dynamics of organic structures(outward focus)
Basically it is introverts vs extraverts
absorption of the outside world makes it all about doing stuff
pumpkinperson said:
Compared to the average person, math geniuses are MORE socially intelligent. Compared to verbal geniuses, they are socially dumb. People like Bill Gates seem socially dumb because you’re comparing him to other elites, but compared to the average American, he’s pretty polished.
The whole concept of g is based on the assumption that ALL cognitive abilities are positively correlated. In over 100 years of trying, no one has been able to debunk that.
illuminaticatblog said:
I think what you get at pp is that sound waves can be understood better by socially intelligent persons.
Listening to what people do is super important also.
But that means the emotional inflection behind words matters, and you do not believe in emotional intelligence only that if you memorize words as in the number of words in long sentences you can do well on IQ tests. So a person does not need to know the true meaning of words but only their word association. Because meaning and emotion are highly linked to word meaning in ‘The Way’ you say words (pitch vibration and tone).The same would be true for body language. Math objects do not move, faces move and animators and people that draw can see how people move.
Understanding anything about motion at all would lead to social/emotional intelligence, quant then becomes inapplicable as a concept because it is just memorization of long lists of static objects/words on the tests.
RaceRealist said:
“In over 100 years of trying, no one has been able to debunk that.”
That’s like when people say things about IQ gaps and debunking them – it’s not about debunking them but explaining WHY they occur. It’s the same with g – WHY do subtests intercorrelate? And it’s because of test construction and only adding subtests which are positively correlated with each other.
pumpkinperson said:
Obviously when you’re constructing a test you want to select those with the highest correlations with well respected tests in the hopes that your test will be respected too, but even if they didn’t do that, all tests of mental ability would still positively correlate. To show this there was a study where they administered every possible test they could think of (57 in total) to one sample of people, and they still found a positive correlation with all other tests:
RaceRealist said:
Those tests are biased too.
pumpkinperson said:
I’m sure they are biased against people reared outside of the West, but the research was done on people who shared the culture of the test.
illuminaticatblog said:
rr believes in multiple intelligences
because if we cannot say one intelligence exists,
we need to say may exist.
rr will not define those multiple intelligences,
because he does not believe in neuroscience
LOADED said:
does RR believe in autism or mental illnesses?
The Philosopher said:
Well in 100 years I was the first to debunk it.
pumpkinperson said:
To debunk it you would have to administer actual tests of social and math IQ to a representative national sample, and find a statistically significant non-positive correlation.
pumpkinperson said:
Its actually quite interesting that jews evolved past it.
Well in some ways Jews have terrible social skills (getting expelled from over 100 countries, can’t get along with their neighbors in the Middle East, annoying the hell out of blacks and alt-right whites) but surviving as money lenders required an ability to avoid getting ripped off & to rip-off others, so they were selected for some social savvy as we see from their incredible ability to work the system. But they do fit the Aspergoid profile in other ways: High imagination & creativity (Hollywood, Einstein), obsessive focus, special interest in systems and abstractions (relativity, objectivism, law), libertarian politics & tend to be economists, Verbal IQ > Performance IQ, clumsiness, grim sadism (the Palestinians), sexual non-conformity (Epstein,Woody Allen, pornographers).
LOADED said:
individually Jews are socially intelligent and in groups they are dumb is one way of replicating what was said.
The Philosopher said:
Both your responses above are empirically false. Engineers have more autistic kids and math nerds are horrible socially.
pumpkinperson said:
Both your responses above are empirically false. Engineers have more autistic kids
I never denied that. Indeed Hans Aspergergs himself found that the fathers of Aspergoids were almost always employed in intellectual professions & those who weren’t seemed to have missed their calling in life.
and math nerds are horrible socially.
If you look at everyone who is good at math (not nerds only) compared to everyone who is not, the math talented will be more socially skilled on average.
LOADED said:
you could say the same thing about someone who is socially intelligent being better at math than the average.
Name said:
What about nerds peeps? I mean which high iq people (I mean people who are high iq in math or physics or say languages or other domains will you think will have better social skills?
The Philosopher said:
Exactly Loaded is right. If you look at the socially intelligent people all of them are terrible at math.
90% of people that are good at math are not as good socially as jocks or normal people.
LOADED said:
I would say Aeoli has been and will always be the dumbest guy.
he thinks he knows but he is a pervert in disguise! Autists are like that. They think they’re something they’re not.
LOADED said:
the wrong types of people show up when you think that an origin of cause and effect is assumed as true. There’s no way of knowing what’s happening in the world without the end product so the ending of a situation defines what’s going on.
there are people who keep going because they have no options and others who just give up.
some people ought think about giving up.
The Philosopher said:
Jews if you believe they have higher IQs should always have autistic kids. But they don’t. Actually jewish people are more socially intelligent than gentiles. So its obviously some sort of evolution to break past the logjam.
LOADED said:
as Name has mentioned their brains are wired differently because they have smaller heads or brains but don’t necessarily have faulty circuitry.
if you look at people who have higher verbal they don’t necessarily have larger brains they have wiring of the brain that lets them have an advantage probably in white matter….
but a larger brain is probably better in spatial reasoning because of grey matter.
I mean a lot of neuroscience starts as hypothetical speculation.
LOADED said:
social intelligence is definitely more nurture than nature whereas general intelligence goes in the other direction.
being socially intelligent is about cooperation, deceit, strategies, etc that come from the learned behaviors people develop throughout life.
general intelligence is much more static and remains a byproduct of the innate ability someone has.
Not all cases are the same though these are the general trends but people with causes in believing the system are there.
and if you look at it there is no totality in how someone will fare in their circumstances which by itself means that social intelligence can be innate but just innate enough as general intelligence would be or vice versa.
The Philosopher said:
Although I generally get along with my cousins I’m going to be frank and say the IQ difference is almost 40 or 50 points. Theres one guy who is borderline mentally retarded but built like a mountain. Theres another guy who belongs in Deliverance.
The Philosopher said:
For travellers in Ireland they would see gays as kind of like cockroaches or pests in general. I’d say there is such thing as gay travellers though. Somehow.
LOADED said:
travellers are a very r selected group r selection leads 2 a lot of deviant characteristics in offspring like homosexuality etc.
you’re right that many travellers are dumb they’re nomadic because people don’t want them around sorta like Gypsies.
LOADED said:
Jews are very individualistic people in left wing circles and very collectivistic in right wing. Very much the opposite 4 most populations where you see more individualism in collectivism in left wing circles and individualism in right wing.
I think it has mainly an issue of religiosity than anything else though!
sadly said:
https://charlierose.com/videos/5916
aesthetics don’t lie? maybe.
what doesn’t lie is sexual-romantic love. (which is gay! after 4 years.)
what doesn’t lie is “you straighten my brother out?”
FACTS!
run away as fast as you can. said:
“a super wealthy white elite” = shit
but that was never ZA.
the CONFUSION/CONFLATION of wyipo with “super wealthy” is a DART of IDEOLOGY!
bi vs gay. i keep promoting this [redacted by pp, 2023-05-08] who died from AIDS he sucks arthur russell.
but he was actually bi.
the moon landing that supposedly never happened.
sadly said:
what i meant to post.
more than a [redacted by pp, 2025-05-08].
and actually he was BI!
sad.
code shitters said:
the YUGE problem with peepee’s theory of economics is…
FACTS!
globalization benefits the RICH in the rich world and…
the RICH in the poor world.
it HURTS, HARMS, DAMAGES everyone else.
sadly said:
my own shithole country should be at least 9 countries.
canada should be at least 3 countries.
both are held together with LIES and COERCION.
The Philosopher said:
I was thinking about jews in doing public service jobs in the west and whether its net benefit or a net minus.
Obviously the neocons in the Deep State and State department are gigantic minus.
But the plus is all these high IQ civil servants and economists and people like Ben Bernanke, Jeff Sachs and Robert Reich and uh, Robert Rubin….actually scratch the last one lol.
Then you probably have maybe 40% of NASA scientists in the 50s being jews. Most leading academics in most fields. A lot of current regulators under Biden.
Its a wash overall.
fury vs usyk may 18. the 44th anniversary of the mt st helens eruption! said:
your philosemtism is gay and retarded.
jews are great at self-promotion. top academics in the mind of a retarded person like yourself = who you’ve heard of.
pipo are heard of for two reasons:
on top of that jews are not spread evenly across academia. just like jewish billionaires are not spread evenly across industry.
40% of NASA scientists and 0% of astronauts.
the first you give no evidence for.
the second is easily checked.
and who was the top NASA scientist back in the day?
a card carrying nazi. werner von braun.
pill is a hasbara agent in his spare time.
sad.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
the 44th anniversary you retard!
mt st helens blew a year and a month before the MMWR report on AIDS.
The Philosopher said:
Its strange that 90% of the top leftwing economists are jews.
And most of the ‘top’ rightwing economists are gentiles (probably a lot dumber lol).
Obviously 90% of the top finance people are jews who are all severely rightwing.
The Philosopher said:
You know I’ve listened to a lot of neocon Ben and can’t figure out what he thinks about economics. Is he for free trade? Is he for a minimum wage? Whats his stance on anti-trust?
Neocons rarely talk about economics actually other than general platitudes.
The Philosopher said:
Anyways, we recently brought the jew Ben Bernanke in to advise us on improving our forecasting. It was great. When you make jews do narrow technical quant stuff everyone benefits.
The Philosopher said:
Puppy is Israels government closer to america or to nazi germany/fascist Italy.
IQ test Q.
pumpkinperson said:
The latter obviously. My social IQ is FIFTY POINTS above your level.
LOADED said:
that’s not really a social intelligence question as much as a broad generalized one imo.
Anime said you don’t believe in emotional intelligence is that true.
pumpkinperson said:
I prefer the term social intelligence or Theory of Mind because emotional intelligence has also been used to describe personality traits like impulse control etc
pumpkinperson said:
Among gentiles with above average general knowledge & below average agreeableness it measures social IQ
illuminaticatblog said:
IQ tests do not measure one’s ability to know how energy moves in people.
Social Intelligence = knowing how people move energetically (knowing people’s emotions)
Sound happens to be best at detecting people’s emotions verbally making language relevant because of emotional charge.
Visually, IQ tests do not tell us about motion or details either which are not the same as spatial per say. but still important.
LOADED said:
I kind of meant it was such an obviously predetermined question and answer that it could be a social IQ question yes.
I think that it’s definitely a very strong indicator of how you view the world though more cynical or more agreeable.
as you mentioned!
LOADED said:
Wypipo
sadly said:
but the pill personality is just repeating what i’ve said.
wypipo gentile economists (in the US) tend to be more libertarian.
but now there’re korean and indian and so forth economists. they tend to be less libertarian.
but what’s it like outside the US?
of left-wing economists i’ve heard of:
mark blythe and varoufakis aren’t american. both gentiles.
richard wolff has never said but his face says he’s at least half jewish. but at the same time he’s said very nice things about the roman church. the other marxist american economist is the wygentile michael hudson.
but krugman and sachs and stiglitz are all left of the center in the US. but they aren’t marxists. sachs is himself basically a roman catholic. he’s converted in all but whatever.
reich has no formal credentials in econ. he’s a rhodes scholar PPE + yale law school midget.
The Philosopher said:
Top Influential Economists Today | Academic Influence
Most are ashkenazim and left wing. Its sometimes hard to distinguish whether they are left wing from moral sentiments or whether they are socialist because they can see that it objectively raises living standards for the vast majority of the population and is more efficient overall for an economy.
The gentile economists are usually clowns in the US and UK. People like Kudlow and Stephen Moore might be literally mentally retarded. You also have about 50% of chicago school phds on the autism spectrum and then another 30% of neoliberal economists straight up being paid to say nonsense like Mankiw and Glenn Hubbard. There was a good documentary looking at how academic economists in the US are bribed to say certain things especially about regulation and anti-trust.
In the central banks from what I’ve seen economists do not like being called ideological and try to stick to empirical work. I would guess most of them lean left purely from the fact that you have to be an idiot not to see the empirics and how neoliberalism is basically economic cancer.
name redacted by pp, 2024-05-09 said:
kudlow is a jew who converted to the popish religion.
how can you not know this?
it’s like the right stuff guys not knowing steve sailer is a jew.
sad.
you suck at being an antisemite!
sadly said:
i know from chemistry. as i’ve said before, jews are much less over-represented in chemistry than in physics.
but even within chemistry jews are much less over-represented outside theoretical chemistry.
chemistry has 4 specialties: organic, inorganic, physical, analytic.
chinapipo and germans dominate the first two. the last i don’t know anything about. but i did pass the ACS test on it after reading a texbook. theoretical chemistry is a subfield of physical chemistry.
biochemistry has become such an enormous field it’s become its own thing.
from the pychometric and antisemitic pov the reason for this is:
The Philosopher said:
Its kind of bizarre how ‘econ graduate’ Donald Trump is correct about trade more than every single academic and professional economist in every central bank and multilateral org for the past 30 years.
I had mixed feelings about trade before Trump and then trump basically just crashed the glass and I could see clearly that it was destroying living standards in the West.
The theory is simple – you send jobs to countries who use basically slave labour and you expect living standards to rise for natives back home LOL. What kind of person thought that was a good policy in hindisght? Sadly everyone.
illuminaticatblog said:
I understood Wal-Mart was taking jobs away when I saw alex jones movie in 2011 – I watched all the conspiracy shows I could online back then. But I had no tv so ancient aliens I missed out on.
peepee should shrive chomsky before it's too late. he's gonna be dead right quick. he's old. said:
i read his autobio a german-american (gentile) nobel laureate in econ.
“usury laws injure the poor.”
then i knew he was autistic or a sociopath or both.
his name was like stiglitz but he was a goy.
stigler.
sad.
OMG! you mean an inherently political subject like economics has been totally corrupted? that’s impossible! you is a conspiracy theorist n shit!
chomsky calls these subjects “ideological subjects”.
chomsky tells the chroof sometimes.
illuminaticatblog said:
The crash happened in 2007 when my mom bought her house.
It is because my mom was smart I got a fixed rate mortgage in 2014 (4.75%)
The Philosopher said:
Lets look at the neoliberal argument for so called high IQ immigration of computer scientists from India and normal scientists from china.
The theory is that you add these people to the economy and that there is an externality to their work and that they fill ‘vacancies’ in the USA and UK. LOL.
The ‘vacancies’ are the employers (i.e neoliberals) holding down wages so they can’t fill the role and nobody wants to train in a hard degree for a shitty wage.
You then have larger ontological questions about STEM people being employed in free market garbage like making more addictive food and drugs, crypto, producing porn websites, working for shitty universities whose sole purpose is to sell visas to 3rd world people like Puppys dad, most high finance (i.e. pro gambling)… etc
Realistically an economy does not actually need that many STEM people.
All the health insurance actuaries shouldn’t be in a job too, because there shouldn’t be a large private healthcare sector in any efficient non corrupt system.
pumpkinperson said:
The main argument for immigration is that birth rate has declined below replacement level, so who is going to pay for all the retired people and sustain the economy?
illuminaticatblog said:
CIA destabilized south and central America.
Look at the Tom Cruise movie, they imported the drugs and made crime a business.
Why ruin the southern economy to make the north economy take the load?
illuminaticatblog said:
Alcohol prohibition caused the Mob to get involved with the US gov in WW2 – is why FBI had such corruption in the 1960’s and latter on the spying of the 80’s and 90s
Lurker said:
I don’t think it would be hard for younger people at regular replacement level to pay for social security. The problem is the endless wars and aid we also have to pay for and the way the fed inflates our currency to nothing. It seems like global “capitalists” created the problem and now offer the solution, which is replacement migration, which is probably a “solution” worse than the problem.
pill personality just REPEATING what mugabe has said a bajillion times...at least twice. said:
an yet peepee has still refused to admit that she is pill.
and a black lesbian.
mugabe only comments whilst drunk.
anywhere.
because that’s what it takes to deal with retarded pipo.
AND health insurance doesn’t even need actuaries! it’s 100% bullshit! it’s just that C-suite retards think of actuaries as the smart pipo in insurance.
illuminaticatblog said:
STEM jobs are needed but only for infrastructure and designs.
You could have many people working to do this for everyone.
The problem is patents, large corps buy and do not make the products,
the designs sit in warehouses and obsolete computers.
Is why many people are sick and costs are high on basic needs.
Insulin should be free.
illuminaticatblog said:
(Dragnet 1967 Theme)
Magnum, P.I.
Quantum leap (1989)
My mom and aunt watched this with me at night in 2022
Many many things happened between 1970 and 1990
LOADED said:
I’m smarter than Anime and Aeoli.
illuminaticatblog said:
I think so
in quant terms yes
LOADED said:
I think it’s because I’m well rounded whereas you specialize.
we talked about how g works better if one has many skills that are even keeled rather than one that dominates all others so it’s that in motion here.
sadly said:
singapore is like israel.
it’s only 74% genetically superior pipo.
14% melo pipo. malays.
9% streetshitters.
others = mostly irish travellers.
so the chinapipo must have redonkulously high PISA scores.
LOADED said:
Indians are the dumbest people on the planet. Hindus are so stupid they can’t get anything done. Just look at their Kama sutra and such it’s a load of Caravaggios garbage!
sadly said:
fury vs usyk should be a repeat of foreman vs frazier.
if it’s not then the it was fixed.
frazier was the first to actually challenge ali. but ali was only 4″ taller than frazier.
frazier’s next match was foreman and it was sad. frazier was a joke. because foreman was 6″ taller.
usyk was a cruiserweight before he was a heavyweight and he’s 6″ shorter than fury.
even though his name is new he’s also 2 years older than fury.
one of the most famous lines in sports ever is: down goes frazier! down goes frazier!
that’s from frazier’s pathetic match vs foreman.
because size matters! said:
that wasn’t the cosell version.
what will happen on may 18 to usyk. down goes usyk! down goes usyk!
or it’s fixed.
LOADED said:
I might be south Asian but one thing I’ve noticed about other south Asians is that they are massive bullshitters.
they think in terms of power of the mind, how words mean actions, just new age type stuff without the open mindedness of white folk.
they’re emphasizing being agreeable while practicing disagreeable methods of communication with others.
it’s just ignorance in motion.
LOADED said:
PP are you Indian? Not native obviously but south Asian variety.
I can see a lot of similarities between someone like you and them.