Ethical Oprah resigns from Weight Watchers and stock price drops 25%

Tags

PHOTO BY AXELLE/BAUER-GRIFFIN/FILMMAGIC/GETTY IMAGES

Last night Wall Street was rocked by the stunning news that Oprah was resigning from the board of Weight Watchers and giving all her shares to the museum of African American history.

The sheer POWER of Oprah is such that the news sent investors into a panic and Weight Watchers stock tumbled 25%. If any other entertainer had resigned from a brand, no one would care but Oprah has become so deeply entrenched in the elite that even the New York Times covered the story.

Even more shocking, the resignation happened right as the 70-year-old icon has had tongues wagging with her breathtaking weight loss.

Oprah left Weight Watchers not because she lost faith in the company, nor because she has a disagreement with management, but because their decision to move towards weight loss drugs creates a conflict of interest. Oprah wants the integrity to help people with their weight without trying to profit from it.

“Nobody does the right thing all the time but Oprah does the right thing more often than anyone else,” once said the late pioneering journalist Barbara Walters.

“My integrity is worth more than money,” she said to thundering applause as she tearfully said her goodbyes.

Although the average (self-made) billionaire has a very superior IQ of 130, some cut ethical corners and don’t fully appreciate abstract moral concepts like “conflict of interest”.

But growing up a poor, illegitimate, sexually abused black looking black female with fat genes, Oprah needed a freakishly big brain to become the most worshiped billionaire on the planet. This huge brain makes her at least 10 IQ points smarter than even the average self-made billionaire, and that in turn makes her more ethical, upper class, socially skilled, emotionally sensitive, entertaining and creative.

While other rich people are busy reading about stock prices or buying football teams or just watching TV, you can find the upper class Oprah sitting under a tree, quietly reading a great work of fiction at her $100 million Santa Barbara mansion or on her thousand acres of pristine Hawaii land, with no one around for miles except for a servant to bring her some tea.

Brain size matters.

Pumpkin Person was right again! Jeff Bezos’s IQ

Tags

A while back I was delighted to learn that my estimate for Elon Musk’s IQ had proven spot-on and now I discovered I was also spot-on for Jeff Bezos. I discovered a Washington Post article from Sept 2, 2000 in which Bezos states he scored 1450 on the SAT. Given that Bezos was born in 1964, he would have likely took the SAT in 1981. I’ve estimated that if all American 17-year-olds (including high school dropouts) had taken the SAT in the 1980s, the mean would have been 787 and the SD would have been 220. Thus Bezos score was +3.01 SD or IQ 145 (U.S. norms) (144 U.S. white norms).

But nearly seven years before I knew his SAT score, I estimated his IQ based on an anecdote.

Back in July 2017 I wrote:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Taste in movies as an IQ test

Tags

I’ve long argued that media preferences, aesthetic judgement and artistic sophistication are correlated with IQ. I don’t think the correlation is especially high since art is subjective, but neither is it trivially low, but somewhere around 0.4, similar to the correlations of IQ with brain size and income.

Movie critics probably have an average IQ of 115 while the average internet movie fan probably has an IQ around 100, thus on rotten tomatoes, the greater the ratio of critical approval to popular approval for a given movie, the more culturally sophisticated it is likely to be. 

An interesting example is Sound of Freedom which was liked by 99% of movie fans but only 57% of critics giving it a sophistication quotient of 57/99(100) = 58.

I’m not suggesting fans of this film have an average IQ of 58, but a lot of them are QAnon freaks who literally believe your favorite celebrities and Democrat elites eat babies and worship Satan. The best way to discredit a credible conspiracy theory (Epstein allegedly blackmailing politicians to affect Middle East policy) is to mix it with absurd ones. I’m not saying Sound of Freedom promoted QAnon but QAnon promoted the film which appealed to what one critic called “dads with brain worms”.

How does my own taste in movies score by this metric? Years ago I published a list of my ten favorite movies and here’s how they did: Halloween (1978) 108, Friday the 13th (1980) 110, Carrie (1976) 121, The Sweet Hereafter (1997) 114, American Beauty (1999) 94, Silent Night Deadly Night (1984) 115, 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) 103, Creepshow (1982) 94, Quest for Fire (1981) 117, and The Breakfast Club (1985) 97. Mean score: 107; Median 109

Here’s what some other commenters had to say. I’m too tired to calculate the scores but feel free to do so in the comment section.

Bruno wrote:

Discussion about Free Will & some guest thoughts from our very own Anime

Tags

, , , ,

In light of all this discussion about the soul, I thought this interview with Robert Sapolsky was relevant. Sapolsky is a fierce opponent of free will which he defines as a behavior that has just occurred, completely independently of the brain’s history (including genetic history).

Actually, as James Flynn has hinted, the closest science has come to proving Sapolsky’s definition of free will is “non-shared environment” which psycholgists define as the correlation between identical twins raised together subtracted from the correlation between the same person measured twice on some phenotype. Since that former correlation measures both genes and the only environment you were raised in, the fact that it’s still less than the correlation you have with yourself implies there is something about you that transcends both your seed and the garden you were planted in. 

Of course Sapolsky would scoff at the idea of calling this free will, as there are all kinds of environmental affects independent of the family you were raised in such as peer groups, that special teacher who inspired you, the media etc. Indeed Jensen argued that shared environment was a great many mico-biological effects like getting punched in the head in the playground to getting less oxygen in the womb. However until non-shared environment can be explained, it continues to be described as “luck” and luck is just unexplained variance. What’s interesting is that while shared environment goes from about 40% of the variance to zero as we move from childhood to later adulthood when it comes to IQ, non-shared environment stays at 20% across the life-span which as Flynn noted, is exactly what you’d expect from “luck”.

Speaking of IQ, our very own Anime (aka Illumanaticatblog) had some random thoughts on the WAIS he wanted to share:

Is there a soul?

Despite being a huge prole (low IQ physique, U.S. flag behind prominently displayed in his screen shots), Joe Rogan is a good interviewer, although I question why almost all his guests are men. If I had the #1 podcast in the World, I’d be using it to meet some beautiful women.

“Give me a break he’s probably queer” would say the disgustingly homophobic step-dad in Rob Zombie’s Halloween. “He’s gona cut off his dick and change his name to Joanne.”

Commenters like RR believe that the physical laws of the universe can not explain mental properties like the mind. More broadly, many people have long believed in ghosts or the idea of a soul; the notion that our essence can transcend our physical selves however, Brian Cox argues this is nonsense (see video below).

Joe Rogan probably has an IQ of 125 which is extremely high for a prole, and helps explain why he came from nothing to become a centimillionaire in the verbally loaded field of podcasting. But Cox is probably above 150. He has a large cranial capacity, high IQ physique and the calm quiet demeanor of the upper class.

Converting ACT to IQ

Tags

, , , ,

There’s a beautiful paper about converting the ACT to the Generation Y SAT (taken April 1995 to March 2016). Apparently there was a massive sample of people who took book the ACT and Generation Y SAT making it possible to equate scores of equal percentile rank within this group that took both tests. The results are as follows:

Once you know the SAT equivalent of your ACT, you can convert the SAT score into an IQ equivalent using this little formula I made:

IQ equivalent = 23.835 + 0.081(SAT) (U.S. norms)

What’s strange is that ACT.org has a chart converting ACT to SATs in 2018

If you use this chart, you can convert SAT to IQ using the formula I created for Generation Z SAT scores (taken after March 2016):

IQ = 26 + 0.07(Combined SAT)

So let’s say you’re a genius who scored a perfect 36 on the ACT.  If you convert to Generation Y SAT scores you get 1600 which converts to IQ 153 using the Generation Y formula.

But if you convert to Generation Z SAT scores, you get 1590 which equates to IQ 137! That’s a difference of 16 points for the same ACT score. 

My guess is that by eliminating all the hardest questions from the SAT so that generation Z could have a safe space and so political correctness could be maintained, the equipercentile equating with ACT scores went awry at the high end. Until further research can clarify this issue, I strongly recommend using the Generation Y conversions, even if you’re in Generation Z.

Jesus & his “dad” challenge Obama as most admired person of 2023

In 2001, the Harris poll asked a representative sample of American adults who they admired enough to consider a hero (maximum 3 names). Because Americans were free to name literally anyone who had ever lived (or not have lived in the case of fictional characters or religious myths) being named by even 1% of Americans is a huge honor and means millions of people in the World’s powerful country, rank you above 99.9999999% of all humanity! Not surprisingly then, the list tends to be dominated by near deities, with Jesus coming in first.

However in January 2009, the country went into such a state of delirious euphoria over a “black” man being elected President, that the unthinkable happened: Barack Obama overtook Jesus as the most admired person of all time.

Forty years ago it was unthinkable that a black could be the most worshiped person in the World but to be the most admired person to ever live; more admired than even Jesus, the putative son of God was considered blasphemy. The evangelical community went absolutely ballistic, and Michael Jackson (who himself dreamed of being the first black messiah only to instead become a huge pariah forced to live out his final years in exile) must have been so jealous he could have died; and sadly he did die six month after the poll was released.

As far as I can tell, Harris conducted the poll only one more time (Sept 2014). Barack Obama was once again named a hero more than any other living human, however he was no longer ahead of Jesus.

As the years past I kept waiting for Harris to do the poll again and finally decided that if Harris could not be bothered to continue their poll, I’d be forced to keep the tradition alive myself, so at the end of each year I started using Survey Monkey to ask a representative sample of U.S. adults who they admire enough to consider a hero. Like the Harris poll, there is no pre-selected list to choose from so many people just name their parents or personal friends. Nonetheless on the last day of 2023, 9% of Americans named Jesus, 4% each named God and Barack Obama. Abraham Lincoln and Superman were each named by 3% and Donald Trump and Joe Biden were each named by 2%.

Not a single woman made the list for 2023!

However every other year the poll has been conducted, Mother Teresa was the highest ranking woman, and probably still would be had my sample size been large enough to confidentially include names listed by only 1% of Americans. Teresa sadly passed away before the poll was ever conducted. 

Oprah Winfrey, Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama each ranked as the most worshiped LIVING woman in 2001, 2009, and 2022 respectively.

Dec 31 2023 (survey monkey)Dec 30, 2022 (survey monkey)Sept 2014 (Harris poll)Jan 2009 (Harris poll)July 2001 (Harris poll)
Jesus 9%Jesus 5%JesusBarack ObamaJesus
God 4%Barack Obama 3%Ronald ReaganJesusMartin Luther King Jr.
Barack Obama 4%Donald Trump 3%Barack ObamaMartin Luther King Jr.Colin Powell
Abraham Lincoln 3%Abraham Lincoln 2%Martin Luther King Jr.Ronald ReaganJohn F Kennedy
Superman 3%Elon Musk 1%God George W. BushMother Teresa
Joe Biden 3%God 1% Abraham LincolnAbraham LincolnRonald Reagan
Donald Trump 2%Chesley Sullenberger 1%Mother TeresaJohn McCainAbraham Lincoln
Tarzan 1%Pope Francis 1%Billy GrahamJohn F KennedyJohn Wayne
Terminator 1%Volodymyr Zelenskyy 1%George W. Bush Chesley SullenbergerMichael Jordan
Steve Jobs 1%Mother Teresa 1%Pope FrancisMother TeresaBill Clinton
Jeff Bezos 1%Martin Luther King Jr. 1%GodJohn Glenn
Ronald Reagan 1%Spiderman 1%Hillary ClintonNorman Shwartzkoph
Imran Khan 1%Michelle Obama 1%Billy GrahamGeorge Washington
Michelle Obama 1%Washington 1%Franklin D RooseveltOprah Winfrey
Ellen DeGeneres 1%Mahatma GhandiFranklin D Roosevelt
Mother Teresa 1%Colin PowellPrincess Diana
Taylor Swift 1%George WashingtonDwight Eisenhower
Kris Jenner 1%Bill ClintonPope John Paul
Holy Spirit 1%Condoleeza RiceGeorge W. Bush
Lamar Jackson 1%Oprah WinfreyJimmy Carter
William Buckley1%Sarah PalinNelson Mandela
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn 1%General George S PattonJesse Jackson
Wonder Woman 1%Bill GatesTiger Woods
Kobe Bryant 1%Malcom X
Lebron James 1%Thomas Jefferson
Bruce Lee 1%Eleanor Roosevelt
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 1%Muhammad Ali
John Glenn 1%Venus Williams
Neil Armstrong 1%Hillary Clinton
Gus Grissom 1%Neil Armstrong
Jimmy Buffet 1%
Spider-Man 1%
Batman 1%
Albert Einstein 1%
Ricky Gervais 1%
Jane Goodall 1%
Michael Jordan1%
Kyle Busch1%
Dolly Parton 1%
Muhammad 1%
Moses 1%

Degrassi junior high (1987 to 1989)

Just discovered episodes of Degrassi junior high on on Amazon Prime and decided to watch them. I hadn’t watched this show in thirty years and seeing it again was like being transported back to such an innocent time. A time when no one had cell phones, social media or the internet, guys donned fedora hats, girls wore long scarves, everyone’s hair was caked in hair spray, music was played on record players, and you literally had to dial phone numbers.

This show was such a huge part of my childhood. I remembered counting down the years until I got to seventh grade so I could be the same age as the characters and the same age as my older cousins who watched the show religiously, some of them even living not far from the legendary gentrifying Toronto inner-city where the show took place. 

I remember a sissified close friend who wanted to buy a fedora hat and sleeveless jean jacket because he wanted to look just like Joey Jeremiah.

Although the show seems corny by today’s standards, that’s part of it’s charm. Each episode centered around some coming of age dilemma like a girl discovering she’s pregnant, or a beloved teacher suspected of being lesbian, or a mulatto girl getting caught shop-lifting, or an Asian student suspecting he’s been stereotyped, or a supply teacher seducing said mulatto girl, or the school secretary phoning children’s aid because a boy is being being beat by his dad. The show is so pre-internet that she literally looks up Children’s Aid in a deck of alphabetized cards on her desk.

And there’s an authenticity about the characters. They all looked like real kids and real teachers from that era.

And of course the theme song. I remember literally dancing to this as a kid at the start of each episode: 

Interesting discussion about Elon Musk

Ashkenazi Americans tend to be intelligent because of selection for high IQ genes during the Middle Ages. Pro-Palestinian Americans also tend to be intelligent because they have the ability to question the elite narrative while also showing empathy for a group that has suffered for decades. Thus if you find a person who is both Ashkenazi Jewish AND pro-Palestinian, they’ll tend to be very intelligent, because not only do they belong to two intelligent groups, but the two intelligent groups they belong to are almost diametrically opposed, so the odds of being both are slim.

The two men who host the show Due Dissidence belong to this unique demographic and they often have insightful things to say about the issues of the day. Below are their thoughts about Elon Musk.