Out of all the subtests I have added to the PAIS, perhaps none were harder to construct than the multiple choice test Pieces. I wanted at least one subtest that measured pure spatial reasoning. I had already added cubes, however cubes is kind of a hybrid of spatial and working memory. Pieces was inspired by the Object Assembly subtest in the early versions of the Wechsler, which itself was inspired by the feature profile test used to screen out low IQ immigrants at Ellis island. However unlike these tests, you don’t actually put anything together in Pieces, you just answer 21 questions in 20 minutes about how you would do so which makes the test much more difficult and reliable though perhaps less fun and clinically informative.

Is the above picture not just the coolest thing you’ve ever seen in your life? I love old school psychometrics.
A much more detailed cardboard version of this profile puzzle would appear on the WAIS-III, WAIS-R, original WAIS and the granddaddy of all Wechsler scales: the ancient WBI, reminding us once again that Wechsler, who ironically was an immigrant himself, invented almost nothing. His genius was not creation, but curation. His tests became so popular because he did a brilliant job selecting his original 11 subtests and he did so based not exclusively on psychometrical criteria, but on his own intuition of what it meant to be an intelligent adult in 20th century America, which he defined as one who knows and understands the World around them, and has the resourcefulness to cope with its challenges. For Wechsler, clinical psychology was as much art as science and these old school hands on performance tests really measured if you could adapt to your environment in a creative way.
But their Achilles’ heel was low reliability which is probably caused by the luck factor of randomly fitting pieces together. It was also inconvenient to psychologists to lay out all the puzzle pieces in just the right position, so shortly after Wechsler died, newer WAIS revisions discontinued the subtest.
So why isn’t social intelligence a subtest if he saw intelligence holistically?
Was he a jew?
Wechsler believed social intelligence was just general intelligence applied to social situations. Nonetheless his scales did include two subtests that are widely believed to measure social intelligence. I sent you variations of both tests which you took. He was a Romanian Jew who lived and died in New York city.
“social intelligence was just general intelligence applied to social situations.”
I think I understand why he thought this. Because of his neurotype….
But for non jews. Social intelligence is divorced from ‘g’. Maybe mildly negative. In some cases i.e. autism strongly negative.
If I could design an IQ test I would 2 constructs. Academic intelligence ‘g’. And real world problem solving.
So real world problem solving is setting up a business, solving a crime, dealing with a bureacracy, getting famous etc.
Academic would be what Mugabe fondly calls ‘the cereal box puzzles’ stuff.
He left out social intelligence because it cannot be measure on a paper test.
If pill thinks a paper test can measure social intelligence then he is kind of dumb.
You need social intelligence to understand social intelligence and you cannot put that in a box and sell it to other psychologists.
pill still thinks you can get rid of capitalism by violent revolution LOL – maybe you eliminate some of the corruption but pill says things that are untrue about me and what I believe so he is wrong.
Anime are you sure youre 110?
I never said test social inteligence by pen and paper did I?
Have you done the WAIS? A lot of it is talking to the tester.
You asked why social intelligence was not on the test.
How would you include social intelligence into an IQ test. You cannot standardize that so its not in IQ tests.
IQ is supposed to follow rigorous standards.
Talking to the tester is subjective with not scientific basis.
If it was objective there be training courses how to administer tests on social intelligence and thus be on the test so you could make comparisons between high and low social IQ individuals scientifically.
You cannot just make shit up and say: patient was socially stupid/smart with a random IQ number of it assigned to him by the psychologists impression.
What standard is supposed to be used? chicken bones? entrails? dice?
That doesn’t work. and I doubt a standard can be made.
Again your asking why social intelligence is not being tested so that is the explanation.
If you don’t understand that then you are dumb.
social intelligence exists but is so complex that it cannot be recognized accept by those who have it.
you cannot communicate who has it to those who don’t like normal intelligence can be tested
thus we’d need the guy with the highest social intelligence to standardize the test if testing was at all possible.
“IQ is supposed to follow rigorous standards.”
Yea, “rigorous standards” that lead to circularity:
“Subtests within a battery of intelligence tests are included on the basis of them showing a substantial correlation with the test as a whole, and tests which do not show such correlations are excluded.” (Tyson, Jones, and Elcock, 2011: 67)
Test items that did not have a relationship to intelligence were removed. Like knowing what perfume was in this season was not construct valid.
When making a test for intelligence you remove the items that don’t have anything to do with intelligence. Duh
Google construct validity.
Do you understand how that leads to circular construction and how that guarantees a “general factor”?
Intelligence is circular?
Which perfume is in this season rr
I don’t know do you?
The question was “do you understand how that leads to circular construction” which then guarantees a “general factor”?
Your question makes no sense.
How can you understand something that’s not true?
There is no circularity to the general factor.
The test is constructed to find intelligence but not in a circular way. There is objectivity to solving problems.
Do you prefer cologne instead to perfume?
Which one is best and why does that make you more intelligent than others?
The way test constructors construct IQ tests is irrelevant to the “general factor of intelligence”? What? It’s literally right there—and it’s even said in text books.
I know what that concept is. Too bad a slew of arguments make that hereditarian claim unfounded and impossible:
Psychological kinds are multiply realizable by indefinitely many brain and genetic states, so no lawful casual mapping from any SNP is possible.
G and E are are 100% (necessarily) symmetric causes of every psychological kind, so privileging DNA is arbitrary.
Genotypes only define open-ended reactions, there is no fixed causal path from DNA to any psychological kind.
No strict or projectible psychogenetic laws exist, but lawful bridging is required for causation, so there is no fixed causal pathway from DNA to psychological kinds.
Psychological kinds are fixed by intersubjective normative practices, not biology. DNA cannot causally affect them.
If no psychophysical laws exist, then IQ scores, g, personality factors, psych diagnoses, cannot be antecedents/consequents of strict causal laws that cite genetic kinds; heritability coefficients, PGSs, and GWAS hits cannot license causal claims about “genes for IQ”, so they at best track non-causal covariation, so the entire causal interpretation of psychometrics fails – differences in IQ or personality cannot be produced by differences in DNA sequences; therefore, the arrow from genes -> psychological traits is metaphysically empty.
Shutup anime. Most psychoogical testing involves human judgement and not doing equations.
To rr:
I am not a “hereditarian” and you do not need to be a hereditarian too understand that unique proteins in each unique individual will change how that individuals brain is shaped. The shape of the brain is what allows a person to be better or worse at problems solving just like the body shape can be better or worse at different sports.
There is no need to map anything. Brain shapes simply are better or worse at problems solving. The way different proteins work together is why brains have there shape given the interactions we have with the foods we eat and the environment we are in.
To pill:
If there is no relationship between regular IQ and social intelligence then a social IQ is impossible and you cannot make a test for it that actually means anything.
Just admit you were wrong or prove how to make a test for social IQ (show how to give it a number between 1 and 200)
I don’t deny social intelligence exists but you pill are the one saying you can give a number to it by testing.
before pill replies:
pill: I want to combine social intelligence with the IQ test
anime: then how will you test social intelligence to give it a number?
pill: shutup anime, you don’t need numbers
anime: then how do you put IQ and social intelligence together?
pill: what?
anime: I guess you don’t know
pill: ^autism
anime: hahaha lol
You don’t understand philosophy which is a big problem for understanding all the other subjects. Youre very like the other autism people like that.
Social intelligence can be measured. Sometimes humans use judgement and intuition to measure rather than a calculator. You could get donald trump to talk to everyone in the comment section for 30 mins and grade us on social intelligence.
But its not likely to be able to ‘norm’ it is what you mean because the current method is too tedious.
The only way to norm it is maybe make an AI trump or something interview thousands of people.
But it can be measured. And ‘theoretically’ could be normed. But it would take ages.
Anyways im not a psychometric person. Im sure they have more time and domain knowledge to think of a way.
But sadly, Anime cannot think of a way. Which is why….he is in a special needs home.
“But sadly, Anime cannot think of a way.”
Wrong You Fruitcake
https://pumpkinperson.com/2025/11/17/take-a-personality-test/#comment-267963
^This is why pill is stupid, Because he keeps calling me stupid.
He keeps repeating lies about me I have said that don’t follow from what I have said. And over and over he never reads my explanations that I always answer correctly.
I made trivial mistakes.
15/21
Excellent!
19 of 21
I Have not slept in 24 hours
After submitting my power test answers to the mega society I got a raw score of 1 out of 36 (equivalent to 118) – after that I was disappointed and spent all night doing different math things other than the power test.
like I figured out how network symmetries and fractal symmetries work a little and how this can be used to make signals predictions
tried to understand machine code in lisp as how many branch conditions are viable in Turing completeness on a small scale
and I looked at my quantum physics book a little bit
I think I got mild bipolar, sleep was good for a couple of months but I am manic now
I spend half the time coping java code trying to make it work (6 hours)
I created a button in java and it works!
Besides that pill thinks I am a quant lol
no, the power test is really, really hard
I see now why Bill Gates is 170 pp said previously ago (power test is like an advanced SAT)
also I got my computer headphones to work on my old computer I thought was broke, all I needed to do what change the input setting, I got tingly sensations in my head listening to some old music.
Yeah youre a quant. But youre IQ is 110. I would definitely be better than you at math.
And Im not autistic which is hilarious.
You both suck at math, but Anime is a spatial GENIUS! His ability to imagine objects so vividly that he can picture in his mind’s eye how they’d look when rotated in different directions is very superior.
How do you define “quant”?
You don’t need to be good at math to be one?
what does that imply
If you say I read license plates all day then you are a very stupid person because I don’t do that.
is that what you mean by quant?
you are just wrong about me and just want to anger other people like a bully would do, the truth does not matter to you does it?
A lot of learning math, especially at the more advanced levels is explaining it to yourself in a way that makes sense to you. It’s still hard, but once you realize you don’t have to do it only one way and you can find your own way, that helps a lot.
Because of your spatial ability, I would recommend that you try to learn math more visually. Try to find a visual or spatial way of thinking about problems. I don’t necessarily mean turning them into a geometric problem, maybe drawing a diagram would be helpful. It doesn’t mean it will be easy or that there is one procedure, you still have to work it out for yourself, but trying to understand mathematical concepts in terms of visual representations would be helpful for you I think.
For an example, watch these three videos by Benoit Mandelbrot talking about this:
https://www.webofstories.com/play/benoit.mandelbrot/6
https://www.webofstories.com/play/benoit.mandelbrot/8
https://www.webofstories.com/play/benoit.mandelbrot/11
So the 20,000 emails from reps and dems.
Plus epstein files on the way.
I will control+f ‘Oprah’ to see if we get a hit. I can imagine Oprah sheperding children to Epstein/Mossad in return for network coverage, great guests or even just money.
LOL! You’ve now gone full QAnon! You should move to AmeriKKKa! You’d fit in well. But even QAnon psychos recognize Oprah’s sheer genius, saying she dethroned Hillary as the Queen of the Cabal. Alex Jones claimed she runs all the trafficking out of her home in Montecito though he doesn’t actually believe his crap and loved Oprah for years.
Well maybe 50% of the things Alex jones said over the last 30 years came to pass.
But I always suspected Oprah was a deep state person. Yeah. I thought it was very weird seeing her in that hollywood movie even though she wasn’t an actress or good looking or even (at the time) famous.
For me, that showed she must have done a special favour.
But I always suspected Oprah was a deep state person. Yeah. I thought it was very weird seeing her in that hollywood movie even though she wasn’t an actress or good looking or even (at the time) famous.
1) She wasn’t an actress but she wanted to be and had even beat much prettier girls to be Miss Black Tennessee thanks to her ability to recite poems in a dramatic way
2) She wasn’t good looking but the part they were casting was of a dark skinned overweight black woman & there were virtually no famous actresses who looked like that in 1983
3) She wasn’t yet famous nationally but she was extremely famous in Chicago and before that Baltimore so the people making the movie likely heard there’s a hot up & coming star who is a huge fan of the book THE COLOR PURPLE & dreams of being in the movie.
So when you add it all up, you don’t need a conspiracy theory to explain why she was cast in the part
If you are as crazy as Qanon then it is highly likely you don’t understand economics as well.
Capitalism is something that cannot be destroyed by “revolution”.
And he pill lies about what I believe.
You do need a conspiracy theory. And the theory is she ‘sold her soul’ to the you-know-who is return for a career, money and of course fame.
I would say oprah cares more about fame than the other 2.
You need a conspiracy theory to explain why a fact black woman got cast in a part written for a fat black woman? LOL!
I think Oprah, like Chris Langan, are extreme outliers that have nothing to do with the bell curve. Perhaps there are others. I’d like to know who the East Asian or South Asian extreme outliers are, but I haven’t heard of/seen any. The Korean 276 IQ YoungHoon Kim does not seem to be that person. Probably someone just far to the right on the Korean bell curve.
Anyway my point is that Oprah’s existence as a very intelligent black woman, 140 IQ or whatever she possesses, has basically no impact on the estimation of the rest of the black population, which is clearly very low IQ on average.
And so Philo doesn’t need to keep acting as if her achievements were unrelated to her intelligence.
It could be the case, I think as PP or others have argued before, that Hollywood and other people and jews are always looking for somewhat talented minorities to fill certain spots. (It’s really inherent in many of the most common human moral philosophies to find ways to connect to each other and bypass or differences, or perhaps people are just novelty seeking and want to see an X do something mostly Y’s are known for doing, or just want to see something new in general)
Therefore, Oprah needn’t have a super super high IQ as much as be relatively talented compared to the rest of the black population.
140 IQ seems kind of high but if her’s is particularly concentrated in a type of “empire building” and socializing and emotional empathy uses, it will look quite different from the typical 140 White or Asian, who are probably more likely to be introverted (relatively speaking) and more spatial, or even different from the 140 IQ jew.
Jews like seeing black faces in high places, but they don’t want blacks being real competition, thus Hernstein & Murray proved that when you control for IQ, blackness helps you get a high status job, but it still hurts you when it comes to getting rich, which makes Oprah’s financial achievements all the more impressive in the pre-woke era. Because for every “liberal” Jew who wants to see blacks succeed (and there were also many Jews who wanted Oprah to fail btw), America also has a huge white nationalist population that Jayman has traced to Scotts-Irish immigration (Trump’s base). Look at what they’re doing to Vivek & Kash Patel. Despite years of kissing MAGA ass, MAGA wants to deport them lol.Only Oprah had the genius to win over this tough crowd who made up a huge percentage of daytime TV watchers in the 1980s when they were even more extreme:
Why do you people keep saying Oprah is 140?
She never took an IQ test.
She never even took a high school test.
Theres no evidence except puppys ‘estimation’. Puppys quant estimations are maybe the worst math ive ever seen. Even in Africa they would laugh at it.
The only real argument puppy ever made was that Oprah is very intelligent because she got rich…..
Kim Kardashian is richer than Oprah now btw.
Puppy is one of these libertarian uh, ‘special thinking’ types that can’t understand getting rich is not like solving equations and learning a language or doing a great trivial pursuit score.
Actually kardashian has never made the Forbes 400 but pill is absolutely right that many billionaires have mediocre IQs
However the AVERAGE self-made MULTIbillionaire is 130. Pill can argue Oprah’s way below this average since she’s black & got rich in entertainment instead of say high tech or hedge funds and never went to Harvard
I’d argue she’s well above the average cause she’s not just one in a million in money but also in brain size. She’s also had a much bigger impact on society than most other billionaires and overcame more challenges like poverty, sexism, racism, colourism, classism, fat phobia, sexual abuse etc
I wouldn’t say that many White Nationalists don’t want to deport Kash and Vivek, just as many muslims are definitely pro-terrorism, but at the same time, there are a significant amount of pro-Whites who are just 1. tired of seeing minorities, but especially Indians who are basically complete newcomers to the US, dominate any major position in a supposedly “conservative” party or government, and 2. are trying to push the Overton window.
To me it’s similar to many who might say “abortion is (blanketly) wrong/evil” and even some who say “abortion should be outlawed”. I’m not saying not to believe people at their words, but obviously you have to socially tarded to not see that this motivation to voice more extreme opinions than you hold is also present. Of course, when the time comes where whatever group gets into power gets into power, depending on the group’s fundamental beliefs and the society/people itself, you could actually see many things get even more extreme due to some sort of vicious circle of mistrust or necessity (seems to happen with extreme communist states like North Korea).
Obviously Trump does this himself, renegging on or partially filling slogans and promising.
That’s a great observation that Oprah has been in a lion’s den in many ways.
At the same time it does seem many black entertainers literally get away with murder and rape in Western countries in ways other races don’t. So, I’m not sure how much scandals (especially after the 80’s or 90’s) would harm Oprah.
Black entertainers in israeli media i.e. western media are puppets. Always carefully selected and promoted puppets.
Every black ‘celebrity’ is carefully selected. I can literally name the selectors in music, books, and film if you want.
Any black that says anything pro nationalist or pro majority in politics in any jurisidction gets sent back to the homeless camp.
You might notice that modern black entertainers never talk about redistribution or Wall St or foreign wars. You don’t find that really bizarre? All the other musicians talk about Gaza. When was the last time Jay Z or the canadian mulatto talked about it?
When Kanye was the number 1 artist it was all great for Ben Shapiro. As soon as Kanye’s schiz got out of control, he literally can’t even have a bank account.
And its the same with any other black celebrity. Most are terrified of Harvey Weinstein types. If they punch, they are told to punch downwards on whitey or even other blacks.
This is why im deeply suspicious of a local radio host being cast in a Spielberg movie ‘off the cuff’. Its never ‘off the cuff’. Theyre too intelligent for that. They don’t just let people walk in off the street into a movie, or a trading floor, or a law firm etc etc.
The only person that can walk off the street and get a job in an investment bank, is another jew. THeyre extremely socialist. They pretend to be neoliberal of course in their academic papers.
You need to stop seeing the world as a ‘trad con’ and more like a Marxist. Everything is in its position for a purpose. Even if it seems accidental….
Does Kim Kardashian the number 1 reality star really have a fetish for basketball players?
Hahaha.
Kash Patel and Vivek are even more outrageous examples. Kash’s ‘girlfriend’ is a literal Mossad agent. Vivek made his money in hedge funds i.e. his first boss was almost certainly a jew. Then became a billionaire doing financial engineering/patent trolling.
An Indian that made his money in say, manufacturing or the real economy is ‘outside money’ to them. i.e. dangerous.
Indians are interesting in that a lot of them seem to have this gamma male stereotype going on i.e. low T schemer types. They will always suck up to Master.
>Every black ‘celebrity’ is carefully selected.
That’s only true after the 1996 telecommunication act consolidated all media into just 6 companies which allowed just a few oligarchs to play gate keeper. But in Oprah’s day, there were 70 different media companies and hundreds of different TV stations so it was much more of a free market. That’s why it took so long for other blacks to follow in Oprah’s footsteps.
You might notice that modern black entertainers never talk about redistribution or Wall St or foreign wars.
Neither do white media figures. If anything the black ones talk about foreign wars more: Ta-Nehisi Coates, Candace Owens, Dave Chapelle, Oprah:
When was the last time Jay Z or the canadian mulatto talked about it?
No one’s saying Jay Z has courage or ethics. But I bet he has an IQ above 120.
When Kanye was the number 1 artist it was all great for Ben Shapiro. As soon as Kanye’s schiz got out of control, he literally can’t even have a bank account.
Virtually the same thing happened to Nick Fuentest and Mel Gibson and they’re white entertainers.
And its the same with any other black celebrity. Most are terrified of Harvey Weinstein types
Everyone’s terrified of a powerful bullies, not black entertainers only. Look at all the white & Jewish tech billionaires, media companies and Ivy League schools bending the knee to Trump. Look at how terrified Trump is of Bibi
This is why im deeply suspicious of a local radio host being cast in a Spielberg movie ‘off the cuff’.
You’re a paranoid schiz. Of course you’re deeply suspicious.
Its never ‘off the cuff’. Theyre too intelligent for that. They don’t just let people walk in off the street into a movie
Why the hell not? Being in a Spielberg movie doesn’t give you any real power. And she was not just a local host, she was the first TV host to beat Donahue in his hometown or any market for that matter. That made her the hottest media story of the year and on top of that she wanted desperately to be in the movie and was perfectly suited for the part. This is such a nutty argument you’re making. It’s like saying there’s some conspiracy for why Gabourey Sidibe got her role as Precious.
Everything is in its position for a purpose. Even if it seems accidental….
Accidents happen all the time but your schiz causes you to hypermentalize and see a design behind random events
So basically Puppy. This is where we end the debate and I do a ‘sniper shot’.
If a latino, native american or indian radio host in the 1980s beat Donahue, would they get invited into Hollywood movies? Yes/No
Take your time. Im waiting. I can wait all day.
OF COURSE THEY WOULD! In fact they’ve been invited over much less. Native American William Sampson got cast in the most famous movie of the 1970s despite not only having zero acting experience, but zero media experience of any kind. He was a complete nobody, so obscure that the film makers couldn’t even find him to offer him an audition because no one knew where on Earth he was.
Oprah by contrast only got offered a movie part after making history by dethroning the king of American media in his own backyard, and being so obsessed with the book the film was based on that she would hand out copies to strangers as she walked to work. She was also a former Miss Black Tennessee thanks to dramatic recitation skills.
Stop lying. Natives, hispanics and south asians were basically banned from media unless playing specific typecast roles. THey weren’t ‘useful’ to Ben shapiro.
I can’t name 1 actor from the 70s, 80s and 90s. DOes antonio banderas count as hisapanic? Not really. I never heard of William Sampson. He never had a top career.
Jews would rather literally run a schizophrenic 90IQ woman for president than a native american, hispanic or south asian, or even these days non-paedophile/gay white person.
Stop lying. Natives, hispanics and south asians were basically banned from media unless playing specific typecast roles.
You think Oprah’s role in THE COLOR PURPLE wasn’t a typecast role? LMAO
THey weren’t ‘useful’ to Ben shapiro.
Then how do you explain William Sampson? Maybe, just maybe, some director’s actually cast people because they’re right for the part
and not because they’re useful to Ben Shapriro. Shocking idea I know.
I never heard of William Sampson. He never had a top career.
If Oprah’s talk show had flopped you never would have heard of her either. She would have just been remembered as the fat girl in THE COLOR PURPLE just as Sampson is remembered only as the big Indian in ONE FLEW OVER CUCOO’S NEST
Jews would rather literally run a schizophrenic 90IQ woman for president
Speaking of Harris, how do you think she did with Tim Miller recently?:
Well then put the pieces in a bucket instead of laying them on the table. THey need to IQ test psychologists adminisering the tests.
Good idea
However it was the designers of the test not the administrators of the test that were stupid.
At some threshold test designers were not able to think what you just thought.
So what else is missing from IQ tests that would be important?
Many things get left out then that would help improve the accuracy of test scores.
The test’s designers construct in to the test what they want, and therefore make it a biased test.
They wanted to make the test so that it showed who was better at solving harder and harder problems.
Maybe you don’t agree with that as “intelligence” but is is close enough that you can predict who will be better at solving problems than others by using it to test people.
those that get higher score solve the harder problems
in other words it predicts what it tests making it a valid construct
Im not familiar with all the branches of math. But the ones puppy does most badly is ‘freestyle estimations’ that they ask at consultancies and some banks.
So basically the guy will ask something like ‘how many pizzas are sold in Chicago in a 12 month period’.
Because it involves thinking and not just computing.
But the ones puppy does most badly is ‘freestyle estimations’ that they ask at consultancies and some banks.
Actually that’s probably the thing I do best, mathematically speaking
The other time when she was ‘in on it’ – when her friend Marianne ran for president and she refused to endorse her but endorsed that neocon demonic corpse hilary in 2016.
I listened to Marianne at the primary and thought she was a hippie.
But it was the media making her out to be a crazy person.
Over the last 10 years Ive realised Marianne is pretty typical in intellect for an ashkenazim. And frankly, I wonder if someone that intelligent is actually religious.
Oprah had another chance to endorse marianne and she opted to endorse that schiz clown hack Kamala.
So in 2028, when Kamala runs again, you can be sure the neocons will tell her to do another piece of shit sitdown $300m budget interview where Oprah will basically answer her own questions and prop up that corpse on the chair opposite.
Mel Gibson said Kamala had the IQ of a fence post. 100% correct by Mel as usual. If Mel was american, he would be the ideal president.
Marianne didn’t have the charisma, political skills, or establishment backing to exploit an Oprah endorsement who was by then past her prime anyway, so Oprah was not going to destroy her friendship with the Obamas by not backing Hillary in 2016 or alienate her black woman fans by not endorsing Harris in 2020, just to support someone was going to lose anyway. Also many white women were pissed at Oprah for supporting Obama over Hillary in 2007 so supporting Hillary in 2016 was her chance to try to win some of those fans back.
She wasn’t over the hill in 2016. If she did a sitdown interview with Marianne, Marianne’s charisma would come through.
Oprah, as you said yourself dumbass, was a kingmaker.
Although Im guessing ben shapiro would instruct Oprah to keep spamming religion, LGBT and BLM questions at Marianne instead of letting her talk about foreign policy or econ.
She wasn’t over the hill in 2016. If she did a sitdown interview with Marianne, Marianne’s charisma would come through.
No it wouldn’t have. You would have had Trump making fun of her hippie talk about peace, love and spirituality and a panel on CNN saying “you know for once I have to agree with Trump”
Oprah, as you said yourself dumbass, was a kingmaker.
She was a king maker when she had the #1 syndicated show in America but after retiring in 2011, she along with all traditional media have slowly become less relevant every year.
Of course she can still draw a huge audience as she proved when she interviewed Prince Harry and Megyn Markle, but Marianne was so far behind in the polls that you’d need a lot more than that to make her competitive especially being a woman in the most sexist country on Earth.
Although Im guessing ben shapiro would instruct
Ben Shapiro only has power over Republicans or people his friend Bibi has dirt on like I’m guessing Trump & Elon who did that apology tour.
????? WHAT?
Its well known the neocons also control the dem side as well. Ive explained and literally named the key neocons on ‘the dem’ side for 8 years straight. They agree more with Ben, than Marianne, even though Marianne is a jew and a dem.
Lack of political imagination and social intelligence. Bernie was also 5% when he started in the polls. No name recognition unlike Marianne. Literally zero. Old. Not particularly charismatic. No powerful friends. Zero personal wealth. And he ran Hilary to the wire before the neocons intervened and rigged a few primaries.
I think Marianne has more potential than bernie. Shes much younger. She has more charisma in a free flow conversation. And being a woman is actually an ace card in dem politics, not a sandbag hahaha. Most dem voters are women….you figured that out yet?
Her ceiling is higher. So Oprah could have sent her to the moon. All Marianne had to do was not talk about religion and spritiuality. If she focused on econ, corruption, neocons and even things like climate or abortion like she did with Cenk. She would win the primary ahead of even Bernie or Warren or any other progressive with the sole exception of Mamdani….who cannot run for president which is moot.
Ive explained
Dude. I’ve known about the neocon agenda for 20 years, back when you were still a liberal thinking the Iraq War was about oil.
Lack of political imagination and social intelligence.
On your part. I would never deny Dems were controlled by neocons. I denied they were controlled by Shapiro. On the Dem side, they’re controlled by the NY Times, AIPAC and a handful of billionaires and network executives & perhaps Epstein controlled both sides.
Bernie was also 5% when he started in the polls.
Bernie was a cultural phenomenon: it became cool and trendy for young people to vote for this grumpy old socialist. There’s no way to predict Marianne would have taken off the same way.
Bernie was a cultural phenomenon: it became cool and trendy for young people to vote for this grumpy old socialist. There’s no way to predict Marianne would have taken off the same way.
This is why youre horrible at analysing politics or indeed any subject involving humans. Unlike you I can actually make predictions like [redacted by pp, 25-11-15] and Biden stepping down months in advance.
I would say she would have had an even stronger chance against Hilary than Bernie. Which is possibly why Oprah chose to ignore her.
I would never deny Dems were controlled by neocons. I denied they were controlled by Shapiro.
Can you see the logical fallacy here. Do you want me to draw a Venn diagram?
back when you were still a liberal thinking the Iraq War was about oil.
So weird. I have literally said about 50 times that the first thing I did when I got access to a computer (it was through the school computer lab), and I was 14 or 15. I literally typed in ‘real reason for Iraq war’ and found a website called Rense.com. I’ve said this story 100 times.
The first thing you typed into a computer was ‘license plates’.
Unlike you I can actually make predictions
You’ve predicted so many things over the years that of course you can cherry-pick a few that have come partially true. That’s the same con self-proclaimed psychics use. A decade ago I predicted a billionaire would support the alt-right and that came true twice (Trump & Musk). I also predicted a decade ago that Israel would expand its territory. But if you’re so good at predictions, then prove it by making bank on polymarket.com. Put up or shut up.
like [redacted by pp, 25-11-15] and Biden stepping down months in advance.
And like Nicky Hailey being President and Trump being tough on Israel because his butler hates Jews lol.
I would say she would have had an even stronger chance against Hilary than Bernie.
And then she would have lost to Trump and Oprah would have been blamed so she was smart to not endorse her.
Can you see the logical fallacy here.
I’m not schiz so I don’t see things that aren’t there.
I have literally said about 50 times that the first thing I did when I got access to a computer (it was through the school computer lab), and I was 14 or 15. I literally typed in ‘real reason for Iraq war’ and found a website called Rense.com.
So you were never an HBD denying liberal who thought the Iraq War was about oil?
The first thing you typed into a computer was ‘license plates’.
The first thing you typed in was lithium. lol
IIRC, Mel Gibson might have Irish heritage. His father is Irish I think. I think he might technically be able to run for president of Ireland after a naturalisation.
Mel Columcille Gerard Gibson[1] was born in Peekskill, New York,[2] on January 3, 1956[3] into a family of Irish American descent, as the sixth of 11 children, and the second son of Hutton Gibson, a writer, and Irish-born Anne Patricia (née Reilly, died 1990).[
WOW. I never knew Mel was this Irish!!! Hahahah. This explains a LOT. Why is it all the good guys are Irish and all the bad guys are [redacted by pp 25-11-14]
Gibson’s first name is derived from St Mel’s Cathedral, situated in his mother’s hometown of Longford.[8] His second name, Colmcille,[9] is also shared with an Irish saint.[10]
Wow.
Puppy can I do a guest post on this?
I think this is very relevant.
THis is like finding out my mother is a secret millionaire or something.
If it’s anodyne
Well Obviously I have to talk about his hollywood career and how he was blacklisted by Oprah and her boss. I mean, thats the crux of why Mel is a great man. Overcoming evil forces in this world as per his religious beliefs. His faith obviosuly.
Oprah hasn’t had a boss since 1985, but of course she needed to maintain good relations with all kinds of elites lest she lost her status as the most worshipped woman in the World which would fade away anyway, which is why she so brilliantly struck while the iron was hot & elected Obama. But she boosted Gibson’s career many times pre-scandal and even during the scandal she never said one negative word about him. She could have sucked up to power by piling on and doing hit pieces but she did not.
If its true that she never attacked Gibson during that Passion/’Jews cause all the wars’ scandal then you have convinced me shes not a puppet.
But frankly I would be deeply surprised if she didn’t criticise Mel. Mel is also very negative about blacks.
She 100% did not. I watched her all the time in those days. But it’s not necessarily because she supports him, but rather it’s probably because she’s smart enough to know that people come in and out of power and she didn’t want to be in his bad books if he made a comeback. Same reason she didn’t attack Weinstein when he became toxic.
Well Mel is making a gigantic comeback with The Resurrection of the Christ. And weinstein is in the 7th circle of hell where he belongs.
Longford is proper proper rural. THere might be more livestock in County longford than people
Damn, fucked up big time. I kinda just went with my first gut instinct intuition, and didn’t check that they visually fit. Welp atleast I still got my personality.
Me and math.
Yes I do bad at the tests. But tests are abstracted away from real life circumstances. In engineering you can solve real problems. Make things that do real stuff. That is what I did in the gifted classes. In my math class they would not give us books to read.
Here is a teacher teaching fifth graders calculus.
“Calculus at a Fifth Grade Level”
https://youtu.be/TzDhdvVg9_c?si=uO6BbWq_sjJBv2y1
https://youtu.be/TzDhdvVg9_c?si=7NzDvHvJqke13ddN
–
Test
<blockquote class=”imgur-embed-pub” lang=”en” data-id=”YlxPj7H”><a href=”https://imgur.com/YlxPj7H”>View post on imgur.com</a></blockquote><script async src=”//s.imgur.com/min/embed.js” charset=”utf-8″></script>
[img]https://i.imgur.com/YlxPj7H.jpeg[/img]
[Imgur](https://imgur.com/YlxPj7H)
why does it matter if I thought marsha existed
I did not insist she must exist like pill did
and mug kept saying everyone here was pp anyway
what did I do?
–
Anyway disassociated identity disorder is more likely what I have than schizoaffective or autism.
DID as a condition has the self as not fully integrated.
Meaning the self is compartmentalized by trauma but is not separate individuals that can function independently.
You look at the movie “Tropic Thunder” everyone was confused about who they were. Ben Stiller (Zoolander) and Robert Downey Jr. (Iron man) and Jack Black (Kungfu Panda).
anime: I am a very sad person.
pill: “You never go full retard”
mug: yes you do?
pp: sad
Social IQ test – is “Marsha” a real person?
why does that matter?
I was talking about how pp said I was the same as pill
so his insist she exists well I don’t
what is your agenda rr? to make me look bad?
that’s an asshole move
–
pill thinks you can measure social intelligence by a tests and I don’t. that was my only point in the first comment.
people like him and rr always use against me what I don’t actual believe. they are bad people.
It’s a yes or no question. “[Pill] insists she exists well I don’t.” Just a “no” would have sufficed.
Pill not only thought she existed but worshiped her like a god for 10 years. RR realized immediately she was fake which is why RR has a successful business & pill lacks basic hygiene & can’t hold a job
Pill also thought anime can’t picture things in his mind when in reality his visualization is in the top 0.1%
Pill was also alone in not noticing the attacks on Afro’s blog post were fake
Schiz severely impairs social reasoning
Puppy we both know shes real. The kids can’t know!
I know why you started to call her fake…you don’t want to talk about your religious upbringing. You want to keep sucking on Ben Shapiro’s teet. hahaha. Comfort!
Puppy we both know shes real.
No we don’t both know that. lol
You want to keep sucking on Ben Shapiro’s teet.
You’re the one who worships Jewish hedge fund men. I champion the underdogs like overweight dark skinned lower class sexual abused women who climb out of poverty and compete in a field dominated by svelte white males in the racist 1980s.
Dumbass. PP used to play along with the game that “Marsha” is a real person, but he obviously now is telling you that “she” isn’t. He would know this.
Lmao I told y’all Trump was gay.
My social IQ is yuge.
Trump isn’t gay hahah. I think that particular document might be photoshopped or out of context. Epstein is on the record multiple times stating he used to hand over or share women with trump.
So….
Lets talk about Cory Booker, Lindsey Graham, P Diddy, Marco Rubio and your ‘statesman’ heroes….
Oof. Got way lower than I’ll ever admit.
Kind of surprised, though. I’ve typically done better than Anime on other spatial tests and there’s absolutely NO WAY this is not measuring working memory.
Pumpkin, I think you’ve successfully made a test that measures pure visuospatial working memory, because I’ve done really well on matrices, visual puzzles, MRT, etc., but this test whooped my ass.
I underestimated how hard the test would be. I think getting even 1 out of 21 right will put one above the U.S. median. It might even be harder than the Mega Test lol.
Which makes it even more impressive how well Anime did.
I remember that time puppy said it was probably that if you asked 300 people to name their top 3 heroes, they might say 900 seperate entries.
At that point I realised his IQ estimates belonged in a Barbie movie.
I said it was theoretically possible so that people would understand how the poll worked. The fact that you think I actually thought that would happen shows shows impaired Theory of Mind and/or bad reading comprehension. I’ve known since the 1990s that the lion’s share of responses go to just a few people because I followed the Gallup most admired poll.
Its ‘theoretically possible’ if youre psychotic and think other people are controlled by demons.
BTW only a TOTAL CLOWN would buy into Gallup. Gallup is a DISGRACE. Its worse than CNN and Fox News put together. When I saw the names on the poll I realised it was lazy polling in an elderly dementia care centre.
Gallup probably says no americans care about the Epstein files. They shoudl register as a foreign agent under the FISA Act.
Its ‘theoretically possible’ if youre psychotic and think other people are controlled by demons.
No offense but I think you’re a little confused about what theoretical means. One problem with schiz is one becomes overly concrete in one’s thinking.
When I saw the names on the poll I realised it was lazy polling in an elderly dementia care centre.
That was the Harris poll and the respondents probably are elderly today since the poll was taken in 2001.
“No offense but I think you’re a little confused about what theoretical means”
Yea, there’s a difference between what ACTUALLY will happen (say, 200 entries) and what is THEORETICALLY POSSIBLE (900 separate entries).
Ok fitness trainer.
Name the theory that would predict 900 seperate entries.
I’m here all day. I will sit here. And wait.
It’s kind of crazy that Trump is our first lgbt president.
What’d I miss?
Puppy what is the difference between something being just possible. And something being theoretically possible?
“just possible” meaning actually achievable. “theoretically possible” means it doesn’t violate scientific/logical laws.
No youre confused because you dont have a jew around to sexplain something.
Possible = puppy saying 300 people saying 900 items
Theoretically possible = Normal distribution and basic social intelligence that people will clump up … because its using a theory to screen ‘possible’
Anyway the minor mistake is not using qualification language precisely.
The major mistake is just spouting that you think 900 seperate items on a poll involving human beings, and not anime character Ais, could be this or that. Its not even worth saying.
Its like me saying its possible a black hole will open in front of me.
It was worth saying because many people don’t understand how someone named by only 10% of Americans could be called the most admired person in America. I was explaining that because the poll is open-ended, in theory no single person could be named by more than one respondent. That’s how it’s possible to win such poll with only 10% or even much less.
I had difficulties with the test. A small suggestion for improvement: slightly better photos, perhaps even a technical drawing would be more suitable (with clear labeling of the ends). In addition, it should be made clear in advance whether the puzzle pieces can also be used by turning them over, i.e., using the reverse side. I also found it problematic that the graphic was so large that I often had to scroll (it didn’t help that I have poor eyesight).
My score was 16/21 (two small careless mistakes, but there’s always something).
I also assumed you would have to flip the pieces around to get the answer, but from memory, they all required just rotation. I really fumbled one part thinking it was just a really weird shape.
Yes it could have been a lot better, and yes I should have specified more, although sometimes failure to clarify accidentally makes the test a better measure of intelligence, just not the part intended. Anyway 16 out of 21 put you in the top 7% or the 96th percentile of this highly self-selected sample.
[redacted by pp, 25-11-16].
Intelligence is a funny thing: sometimes I wish I had an IQ in the 99.9 percentile range because there are so many interesting questions that I find difficult to answer (especially regarding human behavior). But then, on the other hand, I already spend all day brooding, analyzing everything, turning back on my way to bed to pursue a thought that pops up just before I go to sleep and would be a shame to forget. Any more of that and I think I’d be a case for the psychiatrist … I might be one already 😉
Greetings to the others who feel the same way.
There is a link between fractal geometry and optimized brain complexity.
Every brain is different but some are more complex than others.
The density at which a region of the brain can maintain it energetic metabolism depends on angle and length at which the branches of a brain cell forks. This creates maximum surface area of everything touching everything else.
The signals produced by the neurons then can become more complex.
We can then perceive more and by the architecture of the frontal lobes plan better. What matters is how all regions work together by the density of the signals and this could explain why people can be better or worse at subtasks of IQ tests.
Having different densities in different regions can enhance or decrease performance of planning and perception by signals coordination. A person can become lopsided in what they can do if the symmetry of the brains signals processing is asymmetric. Just as the body is trained to do different sports and is not transferable exactly to other sports.
However if a brain is optimized for an even spread of metabolic density and the density is high, then a person could be good at a wide range of abilities. A person could think in such a way as to hold many variables of a problem in mind at once in order to solve it.
Some problems are very large requiring many things to be done at the same time with a big number of steps involved. By looking at the fractal geometry of a persons brain we could seen what they are capable of in different aspects of problems solving.
My score was “officially” 7/21, but I guessed on 2 of them randomly and somehow got them right, so my real score is 5/21.
Other people guess too so consider your score 7
Thanks!
I tried to do it on my phone, but then closed out and tried again on my computer, which bought me an extra 3-4 minutes for the last 2 problems.
I scored 19 but realistically would have probably been in the 15-17 range on only one attempt.
extremely impressive!
Thanks! I was very surprised I did that well.