For years HBDers have been citing twin studies to argue that IQ is up to 80% heritable. The logic seemed straightforward enough: Take pairs of identical twins separated at birth (or shortly there after) raise them in different homes, and then give them an IQ test. When this was done in the famous Minnesota Twin study, the correlation was 0.75, suggesting 75% of the variance in IQ is caused by genes. Taking the square root of the correlation suggests an astonishing 0.87 correlation between IQ and genes, and that 87% of the individual differences in American IQs are caused by genes.
Critics argue that the twins were not raised sufficiently apart to warrant such strong conclusions. Some like commenter RR argue that the very idea of inferring causation is absurd because genes and IQ interact. For example good genes cause good environments and bad genes cause bad environments so even if identical twins are perfectly separated into random environments at birth, the fact that they both have the same genes means they’ll both end up in similar environments by age 40, so does it really make sense to credit the genes for their IQ similarity when the genetic effect was mediated by environment?
My answer has always been “yes”, because even if environment were what directly caused someone to have a high or low IQ, it was their genes that made them smart or dumb enough to end up in a good or bad environment in the first place, relative to the one they started in, so genes were the ultimate cause of the IQ.
But then I did a thought experiment: Imagine if in the future they develop really good gene editing technology and the richer your parents, the better the gene editing is. Now imagine if we did studies of identical twins raised apart in this society. We might find heritability drops to only 0% because when your identical twin is raised from birth in a much richer home, his adoptive parents can afford the best gene editing software money can buy, causing his intelligence to be twice yours.
Even if the IQ gaps between identical twins raised apart in such a society were 100% caused by genetic editing, twin studies would show them to be 100% caused by environment because the IQ correlation between identical twins raised apart in that society might be zero.
Even though it’s technically true that their environment caused their IQ differences since environment mediated access to gene editing, it would feel somehow wrong to say genes had no effect on their IQ, when literally 100% of the IQ differences were caused by gene editing.
So what I learned from this thought experiment is that heritability does not partition the variance into genes vs environment, but rather it partitions it into genes you were born with vs environment you were born with. Only in organisms that have very little ability to change their environment (like plants or to some degree people living in strict caste systems like 1940s India) , do twin studies capture the full spirit of heritability.
Pumpkin Person 
Puppys idea of debating is calling someone a racist or antisemite and then closing his eyes and waiting for applause
Anyways, im to the left of all you people. you think youre social justice warriors.
Me and Lurker are the actually the only social justice warrior here.
^I have some Irish heritage. If I check in certain parts of my ancestry on an online site, assuming it’s accurate, which it seems to be for the past couple hundred of years because of the documentation, I can see some people on my dad’s side (just what I rechecked right now, remembering from before) who were born in Leinster and Down, and also some from Wales. Maybe Catholic immigrants working on newly booming transport infrastructure.
I also see that some moved from Ireland to Ontario, Canada around the 1820s.
Muh genetic diversity creating muh highly liberated mind from kin-based obligations.
Very cool and interesting though.
melo is an example of how the media mind control people
he believes that what the people say on the TV is the most important thing ever when they will just move on to another most important thing ever topic in a few weeks or months.
Remember when Trump was a Russian spy on the media full blast. Stupid. Half the country does not watch the news and this is why the election polls are always wrong.
The reason the Epstein files are not being released is because top officials in government left and right would get in trouble. So it’s not just about trump but about the corruption in the government to cover it up. Melo is naive to think the Democrats want to be exposed themselves like trump would be. They have dirt on a lot of people the government is destroying more evidence right now on both sides.
I voted for the Democrat this election cycle. Don’t give me any beef about which side I am on. I don’t care.
If genes interact with the environment that means genes have causality.
Development is physical and not based on pixie dust. The brain is wired up and stores what we learn. I read about the wiring of the brain stem and limbic system and cortical columns. Genes form them as innate structures. Everything connected together is because it helps control the organism. If the connection is deleted by a gene being deleted then the connection doesn’t form. Changes in the direction or thickness of where connections grow can effect how we learn and perceive and by the density of the connections directing where signals go. This is all based on evolution. Look up Paul Ciseks work.
again because development is physical and genes are casual (interact with the environment) we can predict what they do in any organism and understand how to make braincells grow connections faster slower and in different directions and attach to the right positions.
brain plasticity is real.
to make people more intelligent we can chemically induce the right kinds of plasticity.
We would need to understand the network of gene processes in the individual to intervene in that individual.
Already you can find out your health status on genomelink.com it tells you over there hundreds things and how to improve your diet.
the ACC is used to understand the consequences of our actions.
you do something and a delay happens and you associate what occured latter with the previous decisions you made.
This is why we can self correct in the meta fashion. We build up memories of what worked and did not work and then when we encounter a new situation we can remember if this is the same as before and select the best option. Furthermore we can combine actions in a hypothetical way where we choose to do something new that is a combination of actions never done before in that sequence. By utilizing probabilistic reasoning we we can tell if a new strategy will work better than another.
The ACC helps you build a system of behaviors over time. I must note that this is co occuring with how wide your perception is because that determines your working memory bandwidth.
as example of the ACC helping me learn to control my emotions, I inhibit myself from doing things and learning to control the body.
this is learning a new behavior to calm down. The ACC helps understand what calms me down and regulates emotions and what does not. Then I can do them over and over again.
Pump, what do you think about Einstein twin study. One leaves the earth with space rocket and when he returns the one who stayed on earth is much older or even dead. Do you belive it?
I don’t follow Canadian politics closely. Whats Carney’s econ policies like? Are they neoliberal?
Puppy if its easy to fool autistic people into taking lower wages, longer hours and lower pensions with some circular applied math (‘economics’), then is it easy to fool autistic people to love blacks by showing pictures of black babies?
And all these autistic clowns will slobber over fake polls and fake academic papers because they assume the people controlling the process are also autistic and always are honest. Idiots.
Your schiz so stuff normal people believe will seem autistic to you
No my criticism of Gallup including links to their recent ‘findings’ are valid and youre trying to hide it to cover for Israel
lol! I was the first one with the social IQ to realize the US is a colony of Israel. I was 23 years ahead of the internet on that one
More lying. Refused to call Gaza a genocide even after the ICC prosecuted your leader.
I prefer the term replacement cause you say genocide and people get emotional
My genius was to realize liberals are the replace Whitey party & conservatives are the replace brownie party
everything I believe revolves around intelligence and all else being physical, I have been working on a.i. which requires it.
rr has always trolled me because he needs my beliefs to be racist because he is against me.
evolution is physical
intelligence is physical
genetics is physical
a.i. is physical
he must make all of them racist beliefs. He uses his verbal intelligence to do so. He is a subversive troll.
Basing everything on the physical is not a racist belief system. rr was racist growing up and I never was but that don’t matter because he is dishonest and must be against everything I believe. rr was and still is a hateful person.
Don’t care, didn’t read.
Peter Beinart – “Being Jewish After the Destruction of Gaza: A Reckoning” | The Daily Show
WOW john stewart and neocon Beinart are criticising Mother Israel. Wow. Is this staged? What would the neocons get from allowing this?
The jews are so clever. So theres always an angle to allowing this on tv. What is it? Steering the discussion?
Gallup will now release a poll saying Netanyahu is the most admired man in america. Trust me.
That will never happen but he has made the top 10
Damn, so Starmer and Macron are both condemning Israel and saying they’ll recognize Palestine as a state.
So much for the “Global Jewish Elite”
Trump was right, I am tired of winning.
PP, what is your educational background? I’m just curious.
That ‘The Philosopher’ guy and Ganzir too. In fact, if any readers would like to share their educational background they are welcomed to.
Got my GED and an AAS in a STEM field. Getting my BS now.
If a ball is sitting on top of a hill and I nudge it slightly and then it falls all the way down the hill because its equilibrium was broken, I did not cause it to fall!
Physical interaction by default involves causality.
have you ever thought of physical things not having casual effects on each other?
the absurdity is that rr can “define” physical interactions as not being causal in nature because word games.
same as him “defining” evolution not involving genes because “tilda counterfactuals in phenotype”
any time you need word games to defeat concept you don’t like you are being post modernist which is another way of saying being a cultural Marxist propagandist.
PP on another matter or interest to you, I helped chat gpt formalize why average scholastic scores at top school don’t represent average students IQ :
1. Correlation and Imperfect Prediction
2. Regression Toward the Mean — Basic Idea
3. Selection Effect — Why It Amplifies Regression
4. Measurement Error and “Lucky Scores”
5. Numerical Intuition
In short:
Step 3: Use the range restriction correction formula:
Range restriction reduces the observed correlation r′r′:r′=r×SDselectedSDpopulationr′=r×SDpopulationSDselected
So,r′=0.8×0.3=0.24r′=0.8×0.3=0.24
This means in the selected group, SAT and IQ correlate only about 0.24.Step 4: Predict IQ variance and mean in selected group
VarIQ∣selected=(1−r′2)×VarIQ=(1−0.242)×152=(1−0.058)×225=212VarIQ∣selected=(1−r′2)×VarIQ=(1−0.242)×152=(1−0.058)×225=212
Step 5: Predict mean IQ in selected group conditional on SAT z = 2.33
Expected IQ in the selected group at SAT z=2.33 is:E(IQ∣SAT=2.33)=μIQ+r′×(SATz)×SDIQ=100+0.24×2.33×15=100+8.38=108.4E(IQ∣SAT=2.33)=μIQ+r′×(SATz)×SDIQ=100+0.24×2.33×15=100+8.38=108.4Interpretation:
It doesn’t get it and to prove it ask it
If 2 groups of people both have an average WAIS IQ of 150, which group will score higher on the Raven? The group that was selected based on high WAIS scores or the group that was selected based on having green skin? Why?
yes you are right. I asked him your (pseudo)question and he gave the wrong answer. It’s obvious it’s the green skin group but he thought it’s the WAIS selected group.
He is good at formalizing and finding data but not at problem solving. He also tends to be too much agreeable.
Chat gpt can do little more than regurgitate. It has little creativity so it’s baffled by my truly original theory which can be found in none of the thousands of stats books it trained on
To your credit you grasped it immediately because despite some domain specific deficits, you are extremely rich in g.
Didnt LLMs win the gold in the math olympiad recently?
That doesn’t mean they can do nonlinear math. Math becomes much more g loaded when it becomes nonlinear
Ok maybe ill ask Seamus what he thinks of LLM’s math skills at the highest level then
IQ test: come up with a question chat gpt answers wrong. the more ridiculous the answer the higher your IQ. you may begin.
peepee: i don’t eat meat because morals n shit. but i do eat dairy and eggs.
mugabe: you know dairy cows are slaughtered at age 7 and their male calves are slaughtered too right? you know that all the male egg chickens are killed at birth right? because egg chickens aren’t meat chickens. and cows can live to be 49 years old and have the same litter size and gestation period as humans.
most moral thing to do is eat fish and shellfish and avoid dairy and buy your own chickens with as many roosters as hens. this can be done in a suburban yard.
peepee: but in india muhfuhgguh.
mugabe: they just ship the cows to states which allow slaughtering cows and half the dairy is from buffaloes who can be slaughtered everywhere legally. the calves are allowed to die from starvation and heat exhaustion.
when peepee said “because morals” she meant “because muh religion”.
I actually am working on an IQ test consisting only of questions chat got fails but it’s very hard to come up with questions that chat gpt fails & most people pass
I could literally do 20 questions off the top of my head that chat gpt would definitely fail because it wouldnt be allowed to tell the correct answer.
And puppy would also ban, even just the questions right here.
So you, Chat GPT and Puppy are quite alike.
And humans would fail those questions too because they’re not “allowed” to tell the right answer either, so those questions would not be appropriate for an IQ test right, because we’re supposed to be measuring intelligence, not willingness to subvert social norms. In fact your questions might even correlate NEGATIVELY with IQ because lower class and autistic people would just say the right answer while higher IQ people would know they’re supposed to lie or have been socialized to believe such views are ignorant.
bruno personality and peepee still saying “but muh selected n shit” like a retard.
sad.
I helped chat gpt
hahahaha!
what a retard!
if X and Y are bivariate normal with correlation 0.8, then the correlation between X truncated at the 99th percentile and Y is about 0.4, but the expected value for Y is still 0.8*X.
peepee: that’s impossible! OMG you’re dumb! but muh selected n shit.
mugabe: sad!
Take it up with brilliant Bruno. I did t post that
but bruno is you peepee.
i put the final nail in the coffin of “muh selected n shit” above.
peepee: muh selected n shit is very very hard to unnuhstan.
mugabe: like unnuhstanning that oprah is beautiful and has an enormous brain.
sad!
the only way muh selected n shit works is like the following:
you have to estimate FSIQ based on the highest subtest score. but then you know the subtest and its correlation with FSIQ AND you know the individual scored lower or the same on all other subtests. THEN you would see a much smaller slope of the line of best fit because you have that additional info.
but bruno is you peepee.
False. Bruno goes way back. He was a regular on Lion’s blog before this blog even existed.
i put the final nail in the coffin of “muh selected n shit” above.
peepee: muh selected n shit is very very hard to unnuhstan.
mugabe: like unnuhstanning that oprah is beautiful and has an enormous brain.
She was raised low class and ugly but used her enormous brain to figure out how to get money and then very skillfully used that money to buy beauty. For a woman in her 70s this is beauty and very high class beauty to boot:
On December 23, 2023 you finally admitted Pumpkin’s Selection Theory is correct but then your argument became it was obvious and inapplicable to Harvard, even though Harvard regression on the abbreviated WAIS was the very fact the theory was invented to explain. You wrote:
if wearing a green shirt actually did correspond to such high scores then the green shirt pipo would be expected to score higher UNLESS the pipo selected for their high scores ALSO happened to all wear green shirts.
this because the green shirt would likely be some obscure sign of ability independent of test score.
and thus the green shirt pipo EFFECTIVELY HAVE TWO HIGH TEST SCORES. whereas the other group just has ONE.
this is all totally OBVIOUS!
what peepee doesn’t unnuhstan is that the SAT is only one of many factors in admission to harvard…
ALL HARVARD ADMITS ALSO WEAR GREEN SHIRTS.
But your argument was unconvincing because the non-SAT criteria by which Harvard kids are selected for have little positive correlation with IQ independent of SATs & possibly even negative since good grades and high social class imply extra studying and cultural advantage on the SAT.
If either of you want to argue Harvard is a meritocracy that ship sailed 40 years ago.
I’m not even sure if it was a meritocracy back in the ‘golden age’ before civil rights.
Oxford and Cambridge select on ‘iq’ but in a very rigged way. Its very complicated to explain it unless you know the british system. Its basically a neoliberal way of being ‘meritocratic’ i.e. its subtly rigged unlike Harvard where its ‘pay to play’
You guys know Trump as a BS in economics from Wharton. The number 1 finance school in america?
Hahah.
Meritocracy is relative. And your argument is ironic because THE BELL CURVE argued that Harrvard was a school for the social elite in the 1950s and a school for the cognitive elite starting in the 1960s when SAT scores started skyrocketing. What they neglect to mention is that students were selected for SATs in the 1960s but were not so much in the 1950s so the increase on an independent IQ test would be much less than implied.
If Mugabe says his dad went to harvard, I assume Mugabes grandfather worked in Wall St. I mean, that would be my blind assumption.
If Mugabe said his dad went to Oxford, but as an undergraduate. It would be a much more nuanced. I wouldn’t shoot from the hip to say Mugabe’s trust fund size.
my dad’s dad was an english professor who went to princeton.
you contradict yourself.
pill personality: maybe 40 years ago.
mugabe: my dad went to harvard WAY earlier than that.
why is oprah taking a selfie with someone who just ate an aborted fetus?
sad!
very high class monkey face = SAD!
glenn close looks human.
oprah looks subhuman.
FACT!
why is oprah taking a selfie with someone who just ate an aborted fetus?
It’s interesting because Oprah HATES HATES HATES horror films, but she’s become so culturally sophisticated that she knows the difference between horror and dark comedy film noir.
very high class monkey face = SAD!
Not her fault sub-Sahara branched off the human evolutionary tree prematurely, but she’s gone from the ugliest 25% of her age group in her youth to the top 10% today
klose scores tying goal vs argentina!
peepee: but the correlation is the slope of the line n shit muhfugguh n shit.
mugabe: not for truncated data peepee. the line of best fit is still the 0.8*X line.
peepee: i’m melting! i’m melting! what a world! what a world!
Again take it up with Bruno
Well attack puppy for saying 24% of a populations (i.e. mostly black men), constitute the basis for saying Obama is the ‘the most admired man’ in america.
Even less than that.
I would be very interested to see Obama’s popularity with black men today.
And I think those gallup polls have pretty big standard errors right? Even they have to pretend their actually polling people.
No gallup has a tiny SE but they terminated the admired poll in 2020 after trump won but I resurrected it using survey monkey. My polls have bigger SE cause I’m not paying for a 1000 person sample especially when I don’t know much about their sampling methods
No your polls have a much smaller one because you actually do the polling whereas gallup pretend to poll people.
Speaking of math. i’m not a statistics expert. But theres a lot of autistic people here who are (or at least say they are).
There a very very famous case in England where a nurse was alleged to have killed 15 babies.
And the royal college of statistics or science or whatever they call it said that actually the probability of 8 babies dying in the same ward for ‘unknown’ reasons is probably and Letby was a miscarriage of justice.
Again, this could be a Monty Python thing where common sense conflicts with calculation.
why didnt vos savant testify?
If she is autistic she should be allowed to though. Because they lacks ‘non linear’ logic as puppy says.
I don’t think shes aspie though. i saw her interviews and she seems normal. Upper class even.
She’s socially awkward but in her case it’s caused by the social isolation of being so smart & not by autism
Shes not socially awkward lol. You said trump was socially awkward. Youre not able to see straight.
Trump is a criminal genius which is only one part of social IQ
I was in a plane from Sevilla to Paris and a lady, who was watching beaches from the window, asked the hostess where we were. The flight attendant answered we were flying above the beautiful coast of Barcelona.
I told her it was impossible because of the sea and sand relative position and we were probably in south west France.
As she couldn’t understand the reasoning, I suggested her to check with the pilot.
She came back telling us she had been wrong and indeed we were above Bordeaux. But she still couldn’t understand my reasoning and probably thought it was luck on my part.
when you are 99,999% of the time – mutatis mutandis – in that kind of interaction, it’s difficult not to get a little weird 😊 with or without autism spectrum …
From my part it was a purely social request because I saw I was losing credibility with the old lady I was chatting with, and I didn’t want to because she was an interesting socialite who had even invited me to her house near Lisbon. Obviously when the filight attendant came back, I was – cheaply – crowned by the pilot validation, and the old lady looked at me with my credibility restored even if she didn’t care about the reasons justifying me.
If bruno posted this anecdote thats completely unrelated to my comments or thread…I’d guess the conversation with the woman last 3 minutes.
Jess Glynne feels ‘sick’ over use of Jet2 song to promote US deportations | Trump administration | The Guardian
Hahaha this social media post from the official white house account is peak meme.
Great humour.
mugabe: who is famous for saying “und sturm brich los”?
chatgpt: schiller in 1787.
mugabe: sad!
of course that’s just because chat gpt is politically correct. deep seek also got it wrong. except it said it was from goethe. maybe the chicom LLM is actually israeli. sad.
i was thinking questions any three year old could answer that chat gpt couldn’t.
or questions which are purely verbal or logical or mathematical and it still can’t answer them. i posted a math one of these, but i can’t remember it. and the llms have gotten better since then.
of course the search engines get it. so it depends on how you access the llm.
mugabe just types in “deep seek no login” or “chat gpt no login”.
the llm is not a person who tries to be consistent. its answer depends on how it’s accessed.
perhaps I got this wrong
please explain if I do
Regression on two tests requires that both tests predict a number within the sample curve. This number one in x is what determines IQ when standard deviation between the two tests has normalized at a specific regression. So if both predictions occur the one in x is what is important to predict.
The tests are predicting an imperfect variation due to sample noise.
what happens when you are predicting one test based on another test when that test is noisy cannot affirm it unless you use confidence interval. One in x person but only when you take the discrepancy between them. So one test says you get a score of 92 and the other says you get a score of 135 but then between them you get the two populations average multiple by the coefficient and this gives a true population mean. It’s not halfway between 92 and 135 but instead the one in x has something like 122
is this what mug is taking about?
–
on a tangent
i made this curve to show what I got based on how many people were born when I took the psat
i shows a score of 129 not 138
mega test has it set for the older version of the psat/nmst
the most likely answer to the IQ test question “why was jesus executed?”
which peepee refused to answer because silly woman.
it’s an historical question. you can be gay and retarded, aka an atheist, and still answer correctly.
peepee has said that all christians are white trash except for perhaps unitarians. sad!
Not only did I not refuse to answer but you praised my answer as correct and I never said all Christians are white trash. I like Christianity, I just don’t believe in it or in any religion for that matter.
you said the dogma that jesus is God is white trash. but that’s 99+% of christians. in fact those who don’t believe in his divinity aren’t even counted as christians by the 99+%, like unitarians and mormons.
the alawites and the alevis have the same doctrine. for them ali is God.
If I said that I was wrong. There is a subset of Christians that are upper class, particularly from older generations and in the South, like Oprah’s 4th grade teacher, Nashville, Mrs Duncan who I assume believed in Jesus since she always let Oprah lead Devotion:
Our only records of it independent of the the Bible were the roman records. And the romans basically said he was a rabble rouser.
But I would would side with the Bible. I do think the Pharisees (who are basically the ancient version of neocons in temperment and life goals) influnced the british empire of its day to give them his head on a plate.
No rival cult leaders were allowed actually. Gotta keep the racket as a monopoly. Its just business!
Our only records?
who’s us? mossad?
there are NO roman records.
josephus who was a jew.
another way it’s obvious pill is peepee is pill just makes shit up and then claims it’s a fact. like karl marx lived 300 years ago. SAD!
THE BEST AND ONLY RECORDS SAY HE WAS EXECUTED BECAUSE “THE NEOCONS” ASKED THE ROMANS TO EXECUTE HIM.
PILATE WASHED HIS HANDS.
maybe it was because rabble-rouser. BUT there is NO evidence for that.
HAVE YOU EVER THOUGHT PILL IS ACTUALLY, LITERALLY BEN SHAPIRO?
I sometimes seriously consider becoming a full time libertarian satire account
It would be fuckin hilarious if someone had the willpower to type in all the details and facts from the Lucy Letby case and asked Chat GPT to judge the probability she killed 15 babies.
My guess is Chatgpt would side with the Royal College of Math or whatever its called. But you never know.
Im genuinely on the fence with Letby. But would lean towards, she did it.
Im not a PHD in stats like these professors. But maybe the mistake theyre making is the fucking normal distribution Central Limit Zeus garbage again. I’d like to think they’re not autistic. If they’re autistic, then theyre puppets for the neoliberals. So lets hope theyre not autisitc.
Autistics are probably libertarian not neoliberal and it’s not primarily because they’re fooled by elites though low social IQ might be a contributing factor, but rather it’s PRIMARILY because they love systems and the free market is a beautiful system.
The free market is a theory or an analogy. Its never actually been proven to exist. Even in finance.
Morrissey – Suedehead
The very adorbale kid in this video that hands Morrisey his letter = puppy.
Puppy: But if the Daily Wire went bankrupt then it would go out of business or it would be forced to change its views on goyim to make more sales.
Philosopher: It will never be bankrupt. It can never be. I need you to see that. Thats the crucial step you need to take.
It may never go bankrupt because so many rich neocons keep propping it up, but after the 1996 telecommunication act where neocons has a total oligarchy and used it to sell the Iraq War, people came along and invented social media and we now have thriving subversive anti-neocon voices like Joe Rogan, tic toc and Tucker Carlson and even CNN is now condemning Israel and talking about Epstein all day. This is exactly what Ayn Rand predicted on Donahue before most here were even born: In a free market no one can become a dictator or a monopolist. If you try the system itself will destroy you.
Although being a Zionist herself, Rand would not have been able to appreciate the validation of her own theory had she lived to see it.
You keep talking about this free market thing….
Are you trolling?
Trump is bringing a civil rights ‘antisemitism’ case against Harvard.
50% of its undergrads are ashkenazim, president is a jew. Former president is a jew. Majority of its donors are ashkenazim.
Sometimes you just scratch your head and wonder ‘what is the angle the neocons are taking’…..
Its like that time they allowed Jon Leibowitz and Beinhart to criticise Mother israel on tv….
Why would neocons sue themselves?? LOL. Theyre so intelligent. Theres always an angle.
So idiotic. Harvard protests Israel not because they’re anti-semites but because they’re high IQ and high IQ people are more left wing and less easily fooled by propaganda. And leading many of the protests are high IQ Jews.
?? Are you insane. Thats like saying CNN protests Israel.
Oh wait, you literally just said that above.
OH MY GOD. 8 years. 8 years and youve regressed to Year 1.
OH MY GOOOOOD.
JESUS CHRIST MY BROTHER AND SAVIOR. SAVE ME FROM THIS BS.
Are you trolling now? Is that it? Are you trying to do my job?
I haven’t regressed a fucking thing. I’m the one who introduced the idea of ethnic genetic interests to the internet, however you have to keep multiple ideas in your head at the same time.
A) Jewish ancestry causes zionism
B) Jewish ancestry causes high verbal IQ
C) High verbal IQ causes left-wing views
D) Zionism has become increasingly rightwing
So Harvard Jews are conflicted because while their high verbal IQs make them left-wing and thus anti-Zionist, their Jewish ancestry causes pro-Zionism. While most choose Zionism, the especially high IQ ones (who are not selected for power and thus ruthlessness) will choose anti-Zionism, especially as Israel’s behavior gets more and more extreme in the social media generation that can see it.
But yeah I overstated my case when I said some protests were led by Jews. That’s something Steve Banon would say. My point though is that a lot of Jews partake.
Wasn’t Dershowitz a Harvard professor? Summers certainly was. Pinker was.
Harris?
Niall Ferguson is professor of history there.
I would guess its foreign relations/politics department basically is literally an AIPAC field operation.
Predicition. Harvard will ‘settle’ the case with the DOJ. They will ‘remedy’ the civil rights ‘violations’ by either:
(a) donating their trust fund (government subsidised) to IDF
(b) making Ben Shapiro proffssor of philosophy and religion
(c) limiting white gentiles intake
(d) offering pro bono legal support to Mossad
(e) making it an academic requirement for non-ashkenazim to write a ‘character evaluation’ essay on ‘why Israel is deserves to be racially supreme over all other races, but racism is bad in general’ .
pp
i was confused about how standard deviations work
it turns out that a curve with a SD of 15 it has the the mean divided by 15 each previous deviation.
when I looked at the curve in excell 190 or 5 sigma has on it 11 or 7 people depending on rounding the numbers.
i put 15 at 190 and did the multiplication upwards (175 is 225 etc.)
when it comes to bell curves we cannot make a perfect curve.
you cannot get a decimal on IQ like 105.5 and you cannot get 2.7 people with that IQ either. So rounding the numbers distorts how the curve gets made. Eurals number is used to get the curve exponential. But variance has to be calculated so 15 is what you multiply and divide by on the SD.
If 5.125 billion so people exist with a perfect SD of 15 then only 225 People would have an IQ of 175 but that may be wrong since we cannot know when rounding fudge’s up the numbers.
My theory is that they are ‘attacking’ Harvard and criticising Israel via John Leibowitz to ‘direct’ the debate.
You suck em in. Win trust. And then at the right moment, the dagger in the back.
1 year from now John Leibowitz will say Iran has restarted nuclear weapons production.
Harvard will announce a scholarship in ‘middle eastern studies’. The winner will always be Ben Shapiro.
Theyre so clever. Literally 3D chess.
Puppy is playing checkers.
Puppy is playing checkers.
And pill is eating the chess pieces
Since Im not allowed do comedy and make fun of puppy’s economic ‘theories’. Then lets talk about education and how it fails high IQ people from low income backgrounds such as myself and Chris Langan.
It never even crossed my mind to do a ‘hobby’ degree like Marsha or my very upper class british friend Fran.
I initially enrolled to do philosophy at Trinity College Dublin (which originally is only for protestants ie. Irish gentry), and switched to econ/business to be more ‘vocational’.
I would have been better off staring at comics for 4 years.
But somehow on the book list, some crazy person fit in a book called ‘An introduction to Neoliberalism’ by David Harvey which resonated strongly with my intuition on economics as a teenager.
i..e everything is rigged.
And Harvey basically told me to read Karl marx.
Anyway.
If I could start over I’d do a degree in computer science or data science and get a work from home contract career.
If I could start over I’d do a degree in computer science
LOL
LOL!
pill would graduate top of his class.
computer science majors have the LOWEST IQs of any majors.
okay M, mentally retarded V.
but glenn close is an example of a woman that most northwest european men find attractive and non-european men may find ugly.
she’s attractive in a very germanic way. she’s not super model material but she’s hot. or was when she was young.
NB: the very idea of “the natural” is a nazi idea.
melo: she looks like a witch n shit.
mugabe: EXACTLY!
steffi graf was a beautiful witch. i used to have a yuge crush on her.
what wymen like:
peepee: oprah is beautiful but EGI n shit.
mugabe: contradiction anyone?
peepee: racism!
mugabe: oprah is EXTREMELY UGLY to ALL heterosexual non-albanian wymen.
peepee: racism!
You don’t win beauty contests, have sex with John Tesh and make billions as a TV performer if you’re EXTREMELY ugly.
Yes she was ugly but through intelligent use of makeup and hair, combined with poise, dignity, humour, diction, wit and charm, she was an extremely appealing TV presence.
saying black women are ugly is just saying ‘the sky is blue’ No need to keep repeating it.
but i never said “black women are ugly.”
and i would never say that.
i did say “oprah is ugly. VERY UGLY!”
and i will keep saying that.
agassi’s story of “SUCCESS” is interesting though.
he only became #1 in the world by meth.
so then after having become so “SUCCESSFUL” as a tennis player, actually becoming what he had been hyped to be, he could say “I WAS A METH ADDICT N SHIT MUHFUHGGUH. FEEL SORRY FOR ME!”
SAD!
I think Gisele Bunchen is very good looking in a germanic way.
But I used to be not attractd to her. She looked too masculine.
Now I kind of see it.
and she kind of has a manly body as all elite female athletes must have.
it’s her face that’s sexy.
melo: how dare you! she looks like a witch!
mugabe: EXACTLY!
People say maureen o hara is the ultimate irish woman. But I can tell you now, redheads are ultra rare even in ireland.
Puppy isn’t a college for the cognitive elite dumbass. MIT is.
Harvard is a college for the business/finance/celeb elite ie. neocons
Their average SAT scores are similar. MIT might be higher in math and Harvard might be higher in verbal