So this recent interview of Ann Coulter by Vivek Ramaswamy got a lot of attention because she straight-up tells him to his face that despite admiring his intelligence and politics, she can’t vote for him because he’s an Indian. I always thought it was incredibly naive of Ramaswamy to think he could transcend race and succeed in a Republican primary (assuming it wasn’t just a publicity stunt), perhaps thinking Indians would face less racism than blacks do.
But I applaud Coulter for her honesty. Usually white conservatives can never admit they oppose a minority because of race, there always has to be six or seven other reasons, but Coulter to her credit has the courage, integrity and self-awareness to not play those games. Because as much as Ramaswamy may share her politics in theory, he may always regress to his racial mean in practice.
Unfortunately, as the politics becomes more complex, Coulter’s tribal instincts can no longer compensate for her sub-genius IQ. She complains about all the Muslims at the university protests and to her credit, she has the math chops to understand that even if there are more native born whites, there are proportionately more immigrants or children there of. This in Coulter’s eyes, is proof that the immigrants are anti-American. That would only be true if America supported Bibi out of strategic U.S. interests and not because Biden and Congress are bought and paid for by Zionist billionaires. She’s not even sophisticated enough to realize that? Doesn’t she read Steve Sailer? Has she never heard of Mearsheimer and Walt? And Ramaswamy is presumably too politically ambitious to touch this Third Rail.
And then when it comes to why there are so many immigrants, Ramaswamy has long argued it’s because the Democrats want more liberal voters but Coulter thinks it’s because the rich want cheap labor or because they just hate America.
So when it comes to the two main policies of the U.S. establishment (what Steve Sailer calls invade the world/invite the World) both Coulter and Ramaswamy are either too dumb or too scared to articulate the role of Ashkenazi elites. Or if you want to evade the JQ, at least go with the Mug of Pee/Tucker Carlson argument that racial diversity serves as a distraction from economic inequality and makes it easier for elites to divide and conquer the masses.
A few commenters have mocked me for supposedly worshiping the rich when in reality I just believe in Darwinism, but according to Coulter, this, along with the first two amendments, are American values and another reason why she wont vote for Ramaswamy even though he also appears to worship the rich and is almost a billionaire himself. But he is Indian and Indians view the poor as closer to God according to Coulter.
Coulter says she can call Ramaswamy articulate because he’s not an American black. I can’t tell whether she’s once again calling him non-American or just non-black or both. If he were the son of Nigerian immigrants would she have said the same thing? It’s a fascinating question because black skinned Brahmens have long been considered not only Caucasoid, but 100% pure Aryans, but then David Reich got jealous and did a study proving Indians are a hybrid of Middle Eastern and Andaman Island adjacent people. Andaman Islanders are morphologically Negroid in my opinion, however the subset that Indians are descended from may have evolved into the first Caucasoids before mixing with their Middle Eastern descendents.
Also of interest, Coulter strongly opposes reparations for black Americans. Not only does she deny they built America, but argues that slavery held America back because it disincentived innovation and her evidence of this was the relative poverty of the U.S. South compared to the non-slave owning North.
Pumpkin Person 
firstly
That would only be true if America supported Bibi out of strategic U.S. interests and not because Biden and Congress are bought and paid for by Zionist billionaires. She’s not even sophisticated enough to realize that? Doesn’t she read Steve Sailer? Has she never heard of Mearsheimer and Walt? And Ramaswamy is presumably too politically ambitious to touch this Third Rail.
wtf? steve sailer is controlled by jews. and he’s a jew. he’s totally irrelevant. and he’s a sociopath.
What specifically has Sailer said that you have a problem with?
obviously you’ve never read steve sailer.
sad.
you agreed with me after i posted something he’d said about the iraq war. you have no memory.
Thanks for reminding me. Irrc I dismissed that as Sailer just pandering to his donors but of course that’s no excuse. But he has done a lot of good journalism like showing the ethnic demographics of influential groups like the Forbes 400, the 50 most influential media pundits and the biggest campaign donors.
and have you heard steve sailer? very not neurotypical sounding.
that’s fine if you’re a southern gentleman. but steve is adopted and from la.
he sounds like something’s wrong with him.
i favor replacing every latino immigrant with a pakistani. that way steve sailer will be forced to go back to israel.
[redacted by pp, 2024-05-19]
coulter said she wouldn’t vote for anyone who wasn’t part WASP.
that includes most american wypipo. she wouldn’t vote for rr or pill either.
naturally pipo LIED about it because indian.
sad!
in reality I just believe in Darwinism
if that were true you’d think oprah was a loser. she has no chirren.
you’d also be very religious. religious pipo have the most chirren.
No because Oprah’s childless by choice. She could afford to have had hundreds of thousands of children.
If you look at Chris Langan, he couldn’t have kids due to various government policies and the poverty of his life growing up, as well as not really wanting to be a kind of deadbeat dad or give up his intellectual pursuits. So it was both a choice and not a choice.
But if you see his arms and his lifts, whether or not you believe in his ToE or think he’s one of the smartest in the world, you’d admit he is a pretty amazing specimen. I don’t think there are many natural lifters I’ve ever seen as built and strong as him, and lifting was his hobby while working and self-studying. Anyone who knows about strength training or bodybuilding would understand he’s pretty much top-tier “genetic material”, especially given he’s natural and still extremely muscular and strong.
That convinced me he was actually extremely intelligent as well. I don’t think people mention that enough… because there is appears to be a split between “skinny but smart” and “bulky but average or not so intelligent” who might have roughly the same brain size, probably because of metabolism and/or the brain being more efficient in the skinnier one… but if you’ve got a massively muscular guy, with a huge brain, who does amazing on IQ tests, it’s basically a different tier from those clustering about the middle where body weight or stature happens to be a correlate for IQ.
the obscenely disproportionate power of a small ethnic minority is always anti-democratic. in the case of jews it’s even worse. one doesn’t need to hate jews to know that this is a fact. imagine if pakistan’s 2% hindu minority had the power of american jews. you don’t need to hate hindus to know that would be a disaster.
Explain why without being a gay blank slatist. Go.
^^^autism^^^
would so many former colonies be better off today if the colonizers had never left?
perhaps.
but colonialism was NOT just a small ethnic minority ruling so many colonies. it was also a technically/technologically superior minority. what kipling called “the white man’s burden” was never envisioned as lasting forever. just until the colonized peoples reached the same level of technology/wealth.
europeans didn’t conquer the world because racism and/or christianity. they conquered it because they could, because they had superior technology. the chinese or indians or africans or whoever would’ve done the same if they had been the technology leaders. the chinese are already doing it a little bit. the japanese did do it! because they were the technology leaders of east asia. japanese pipo are not white and not christian. and in their colonies, they were a lot nastier than the wypipo were in theirs.
and wypipo have colonized other wypipo. the roman empire, the russian empire, the german empire, the austrian empire, etc….
the chinese or indians or africans or whoever would’ve done the same if they had been the technology leaders.
LIAR! The Chinese were THE technological leaders and they didn’t do it:
^^^autism^^^
europe has been ahead of china technically since at most 1492.
but actually from the very beginning in 500 bc athens.
sad!
peepee is such a racist piece of shit it’s sad!
YES! india would be better off today if the british had never left!
europe has been ahead of china technically since at most 1492.
but actually from the very beginning in 500 bc athens.
500 BC was not the very beginning. And Rushton implies China was ahead in between those dates. There’s also this:
this an (((andy grove))) talking point. the idea that…
muh chinapipo was kangz n shit!
NO! they were NOT!
BUT!
arabs WERE!
meanwhile IN REALITY!
japanese pipo are not white and not christian. and in their colonies, they were a lot nastier than the wypipo were in theirs.
BUT!
japanese pipo are super duper racists!
FACT!
Mugabe there are blank slatists. Literally every communist who thinks education is the answer and will bring about human equality is one. (Just because blank slatism is ultimately not coherent doesn’t mean people don’t fall into believing it implicitly. You just know it’s incoherent and has no model possible apriori or empirically but still follow it as if its basically true)
Anyway, I’m not saying that practically, an ethnic minority shouldn’t have disproportionate power. But I doubt you could reason that without appealing to blank slatism or just gut feeling. Most of us share that gut feeling and I could probably give a good argument as to why it is generally true, however, you said “always” and that requires a fully valid and unfalsifiable model of human behavior and society to be true.
The fact that it isn’t necessarily “always” true, and you could easily argue that a real or conceived example of a 49% ethnicity deserving more power for meritocratic reasons than a 51% ethnicity, which could go on to bigger splits, is incredibly important, because that goes to the heart of the JQ and Zionism and whether they are behaving more like parasites or more like benevolent culturally and intellectually superior globalists bestowing democracy upon the world.
You drunk.
^^^lying jew^^^
i didn’t say disproportionate power is anti-democratic or otherwise bad.
i said obscenely disproportionate power.
i wouldn’t care if jews were 12% of the 400 richest americans. i care that they are 36%. and an even higher % of the donor class.
capiche?
look up the word “obscenely” you baptist!
should israeli jews resent the success of israel’s 2% christian minority? no.
but if they were as powerful as american jews they should! it would cease to be a jewish state.
But in a free society, if 2% of America is smarter/more driven/more obsessive than 98%, you can’t stop them from being 36%. But what you can do is have campaign finance reform so rich interest groups have less power, whether AIPAC or the NRA. Sailer noted they’re also about 50% of the most influential pundits, but that’s less of an issue now with new media. For that matter money in politics has also become less of an issue because of new media which is why Zionists are so obsessed with getting rid of tic TOC.
it’s got nothing to do with blank slatism idiot lying jew!
the same is true for large minorities like blacks and latinos.
if there were literally zero blacks and latinos in congress because muh bell curve n shit i would resent that if i were black or latino.
BUT some representation doesn’t mean representation proportional to their population.
THE POINT IS under-representation can also be OBSCENE.
obscenely under-represented is a thing too. especially as blacks and latinos are still mostly endogamous groups.
obscene sense 2d: so excessive as to be offensive
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/obscenely
“Obscenely” is a subjective term that depends on the context (obviously you know that). You arbitrarily drew a line. What is that based on?
Oh yeah, Mugabe I guess you have no argument besides muh gut feeling. And throwing insults and names at me, like the true buckbroken latent homosexual wannabe “freakishly smart” childless sack you are. Sadly, you bring shame to the White race right now, you are a typical Northern libtard, the kind letting our states get invaded by low IQ borderline illiterate squatemalans. Wake up and smell the coffee and realize the invading social constructs hate you and don’t give a shit that you think they’d be just like White people after 1000 years of proper education.
Maybe admit that only God can save you from your alcoholism and ask for forgiveness…
the Chinese had a technological advantage in ways we could never know but there obviously was a lot of resistance in having them build their empire.
India China etc from what I’ve read had dynasties that lasted only a couple decades during the time Europe was becoming powerful.
I think AASI/SAHG was its own thing. Not at all like the Andaman Islanders (I think that’s way too far off and just a genetic proxy, not a phenotype one) and not exactly proper “Caucasoid”/West Eurasian. Plus, those black-skinned South Indian groups (it’s not just the Brahmins) have achieved more than many fully West Eurasian groups anyways.
Also, Coulter never struck me as intelligent and I don’t care for Rama whateva
You have some South Indians who look Australoid, and than other, equally dark ones, who look nonetheless 100% Caucasoid. And then you have the Andaman Islanders who look 100% Negroid. How do you explain this?
they could’ve adapted 2 their environmental conditioning more so than their genetic capacities would predict or be substituted by another cohort entirely.
Andamanese branched off at different times than the others and then you had admixture from yamnaya playing a part with the North Indians.
Indians are psychopathic and aloof in social norms. I don’t think they would make good western politicians maybe 4 themselves but not much 4 anyone else.
Indians oftentimes confuse things that are common practice in America as being Westernized when it’s just common sense and the religion of Hinduism is a very extreme displacement of what’s commonplace here anyways.
they’re not very subtle when it comes 2 acting in groups they turn everything in extreme ways and practice mob mentality even when there’s no need.
You could make the case that Indians are among the least psychopathic. They’re largely vegetarians who worship cows and think the poor are closer to God. But Ramaswamy seems a bit psychopathic to me, with his fast talking opportunism and tech bro vibes.
I’d disagree with them not being psychopathic because the history of rape and other historically psychopathic behavior is prevalent there. Obviously they’re going in a direction of being less psychopathic because they’re meek and vulnerable but that doesn’t show the larger issue at hand.
when the south Asians come 2 any country you realize how socially perverse and backwards they are essentially!
when the south Asians come 2 any country you realize how socially perverse and backwards they are essentially!
Not really, the Indian diaspora have low crime rates
Indians have anomalously high GFP, which predicts k-selection and therefore low rates of dark triad. However, they are very individually selfish in the sorts of passive aggressive ways that agreeable people express selfishness. So they have the worst society on earth, but also the largest one because the high GFP keeps the selfishness from breaking out into ungovernable conflicts.
Indians are weird to Westerners. Because they have the gangrape thing going on, but I think alone they would be too agreeable/afraid to do stuff. If you really think about it, gangraping requires cooperation, but low long-term thinking and poor moral values (LOL).
IMO, I think these agreeable types are often “evil” in the way women are evil compared to men: They are passively evil. They will let society (literally) degenerate into shit before taking personal responsibility for it, but they won’t go out and murder, stalk, and kill people or violate them in the ways males would, or get in battles of honor with deadly consequences.
In a way you have to a highly agreeable society to openly defecate (if you aren’t just completely mentally ill or stupid) because it means you aren’t afraid someone will kick your ass, which indicates both your own mentality and your experience of others.
You see these kind of “agreeable” passive crimes in China too, who are similar (but maybe a bit more intelligent and come from less of a k-selected hot and smelly organic environment).
agreeableness is much better than disagreeableness would you agree?
I mean yeah being disagreeable leads through and through by making people question societal values and judgments but you can do that with openness either way.
I think being disagreeable is what makes people degenerative in a holistic sense anyways.
Well I think if you are willing to do negative things in public you could be disagreeable, but if they are just gross and degenerate rather than active it might show agreeability or passiveness. It shows obviously, laziness and low moral standards.
I think agreeableness needs to be balanced. Otherwise it would be better to have a hyperliberal world or women running with men having absolutely no say. We can see that in modern countries this is not good and leads to chaos.
Disagreeableness imparts order and places standards in society. Agreeableness is just flexibility. Without the standard or order it falls apart and can’t really be defined anyway. It’s just chaos and absolute freedom without any meaning or goals or maintainence or increasing of quality.
agreeableness is about accepting abstract notions as true even though they may be against your best interest.
this would mean agreeable people do all of the sacrificing while disagreeable people do none of it!
Good post. I think you may be undervaluing the importance of disingenuousness and ambition when analyzing their motives though.
never trust Aeoli as far you can throw him! He is a man of discontent and malice waiting 4 his opportunity 2 arise.
scandalous.
he’s in his 40s and is a virgin. He has lived a far more harrowingly disturbed life than most here!
let him draw his own map of reality and watch him falter!
HALLELUJAH!
I don’t think pumpkin, for all his brilliance, understands these issues well. Republicans aren’t residually racist. They WORSHIP blacks. If a black were to get up there saying the same things trump says, he would get voted president for life. This is the reason people like Candace Owens and ben Carson get catapulted to the top. It stems from a tremendous fear on the part of whites of being called racist.
If there is racism, it’s towards Asians, but not in the sense of beating them up(blacks do that actually) or hostility, but simply in the sense that they “aren’t cool.” For the same reasons an Asian would not get into a white fraternity, for example. Caucasian Indians maaaybe, but mongoloids—not a chance. That’s the actual white racism in America.
Coulter is very smart. She says what she says in order to stay mainstream. She couldn’t have mainstream publications in bookstores if she started raving about the JQ. It’s widely speculated that coulters Adios America, based on 1997 Alien Nation by Peter Brimelow was what led to the trump presidency. She was the conduit through which the dissident right went mainstream!
I don’t think pumpkin, for all his brilliance, understands these issues well. Republicans aren’t residually racist. They WORSHIP blacks.
My article was about racism towards Ramaswamy, not blacks in the negroid sense.
If a black were to get up there saying the same things trump says, he would get voted president for life. This is the reason people like Candace Owens and ben Carson get catapulted to the top. It stems from a tremendous fear on the part of whites of being called racist.
Or it stems from the fear of white COMPANIES being called racist and thus losing advertising and their ability to monetize youtube so Owens gets propped up, and then if just 2% of Republicans worship her, that’s enough people to dominate our fragmented new media space. And since both conservatives and blacks are two almost mutually exclusive low IQ groups, the supply of high IQ black conservatives is dwarfed by the demand, allowing them to rise to the top. Having said that, I agree the majority of Republicans are not racist (against blacks), but the majority of anti-black racists are Republicans.
Coulter is very smart. She says what she says in order to stay mainstream. She couldn’t have mainstream publications in bookstores if she started raving about the JQ.
I get that she can’t really say much about it, but when she says stuff that directly contradicts it (like that the protesters are anti-American) it makes me question her analysis, even though I agree she’s very smart and a force for good.
I agree with Fraz that conservatives have support 4 outsiders but I disagree with him on the basis of it being racial or political it just has 2 do with conservatives enjoying views and frameworks that fit their reality.
yeah, she’s trying to stay in the official Republican platform, trying to shift the limits of discourse, Overton window, as you will. Agree, the demand for high functioning blacks is greatly exceeding supply. But people are like this on the ground, you wouldn’t know being in Canada, adopting and loving nonwhites. True racists are rare or nonexistent, except for altright types, and that’s an ideology.
@Loaded: that’s basically what I mean. If republicans can have their viewpoints validated by nonwhites, particularly blacks, they are overjoyed by the reassurance that they are not “racist,” but making rational arguments. Nor is it a cynical use of nonwhites to push their platforms, as with neocon Jews with whites, but a sincere heartfelt joy.
another point on coulter is that she foresaw that Trump would win the presidency in 2016(on the bill Maher show) when everybody else still thought his candidacy was a joke. That’s next level political thinking that I can’t even begin to grasp! Honestly.
Vivek said that in a different time and position Ann Coulter would not be as reationary. And that the left has no vision or purpose making them hate america. They both agreed that majority immigrants do not understand american values. Freedom, respect for women, honesty and hard work. – Ann said that the pope was not trusted because America is fragile and dictatorship could happen by any outside force getting into the White House. Loyalty is of highest importance to keep america from collapsing.
Vivek is a fast talker, is like a tech bro and is too agreeable. But He would be better than any other republican I have seen. The paty on left and right do not give us the best candidates and the baby boomers will be gone soon. So I think that there will be a political change in selection processes with new people (millennials) becoming middle aged.
As to who built the country, that cannot be placed on any race as each part of the country was built by select different ethnicity groups. Like example of Thomas Edison inventing the electric grid and Nikola tesla inventing radio and electric motor and the wright brothers the airplane. Maybe black people gave us food and stuff but then so did the white slaves in the roman empire and that empire did not go to the moon.
Also the reason most immigrants from europe went back was because of the fake IQ tests they used long ago to “vet” them. Asking which magazine was most popular in new york at the current time is not an intelligence test. It is a scam.
the biggest thing about problems 2day is we have no direction. Whether it’s domestic or international people don’t know where they want the landscape of the future headed.
they feel as though people are either this or that in only one direction when there’s opportunity in the middle.
either way you’d need a better standard of cooperation in order 4 things 2 get done!
>her sub-genius IQ
In an earlier article you said pp that vivek might be 147 (1 in 1,000)
I was wondering if you can attribute this to his family background, if he was raised by parents that cared about him doing well and the social atmosphere of him being extraverted and agreeable to do well at university.
I may be looking at it from the perspective that my mother would not help me at school and that I was bullied and only had the option of going to a university where not that many elite people choose to hang out at.
I am sure that if I had the confidence as vivek has I would be good at becoming popular. But instead I was doing schoolwork in a mediocre high school so I could read my books after classes ended. And I was not good at memorizing formulas, I believed that I needed to understand what was happening but they never gave me any math books to read.
So mostly I think that socialization and personality traits + memorization capacity is what you might be seeing in vivek.
Ann Coulter is about as smart as I am now I suppose but she has time and money to do what she wants to do. And as you know, I take medications for depression.
My estimate for Ramaswamy was based on income & education. In other words, the average IQ of a young highly educated near-billionaire would be 147. However his politics might indicate low IQ and it’s unclear how they interact with his Brahman heritage.
I think these characteristics of IQ are more pronounced where education and such are important.
A lot of people with high IQs have little educational commitment beyond the necessary and they don’t feel as though the structures of society are quite adaptive in having them become brainwashed by societal norms and expectations.
In this way I think you’d find a lot of Melos out there.
Or other people of various calibers who failed education but are decently intelligent.
Oh,
I just thought that because of GxE you need to consider the E more that the G because of people like Chris langan.
So maybe in my case the parents, school districts and personality in E is a a bigger determinant than G ?
Have you ever estimated coulter’s IQ? Why would you think she has sub genius IQ? If those numbers mean anything, I would think she is a person with true mental ability, neurobiologically speaking.
I think these people may have verbal IQs that are prominent although that just comes from practicing a lot.
a lot of reality is abstract and I wonder if autists have a lessened abstraction ability overall that will be justified by saying “it’s more complex than it should be.”
basically autists are very literal and pragmatic in terms of utility but nothing more. They don’t have the imagination or theory of mind 2 have a better footing in terms of getting ahead.
systematizing is how IQ tests are developed so I suppose they’d have an advantage in scoring high at least the ones who don’t suffer from the full on retardation it can cause.
I wager that without the help of their openness 2 ideas that autists have they’re very feeble minded when it comes 2 imagination and other very important facets of entertaining perspectives!
People with aspergers have vivid imaginations and rich fantasy lives. It’s only classic autists that are said to lack imagination though it’s almost impossible to know for sure.
Well that’s why I think it’s more in tune with their personality than with their cognition.
They’re very imaginative because they have a personality that makes them more susceptible or engaged with imagination.
In other ways they’re very abstractly inhibited.
Centrists don’t get the point. It’s frustrating listening to these dumbasses say that POC are starting to vote Republican because of the economy.
Literally, no one cares about the economy. It’s proven people’s views on the economy are shaped by whether their team is in power. A Democrat will say the economy is good when a blue president is in office and bad when a red is in office; the same for Republicans.
The real reason POC are starting to shift in their voting preferences is because of “woke/PC” ideology.
Case in point, some dumbass at work brought up the evil “DemonRats” trying to tear down a Confederate statue. I dismantled his argument by mocking him with clever humor, and one of my black coworkers was laughing at everything I said, and 100% agreed with me. UNTIL the conversation became about LGBTQ, suddenly, he, despite being 18, agreed that public schools were trying to brainwash kids into becoming trans or gay. I had to remind him that his younger siblings were not, in fact, coming home with instructions on how to mutilate their genitalia, and he actually started thinking about what he was saying. Maybe I changed his mind that day; I don’t know. But that’s not the point.
It just proved that when defending blacks, he was all on board, but as soon as the convo shifted to focus on a group that he wasn’t a part of, suddenly, he was just as conservative as a rural white. It’s disgusting.
I saw a post on Reddit a few weeks back showing what the results of each election would be if only one gender had voted. Surprise, surprise, Men almost always vote red. Guys are responsible for the vast majority of shitty things that have happened to this country. It’s not even close. The only exception, I think, was Obama. And that was only for one term. If only men had voted, Romney would’ve won in 2012
I don’t know what the answer is, man. Do we need more education? Do we need to have strict limitations on social media? I don’t know, but we are fucked without some kind of action. Trump is going to win in 2024. Calling it now.
Kendrick Lamar – N95 (youtube.com)
men are systematizers
women are empathizers
^Based and catpilled. They’re like yin and yang.
Anime and I agree that the commenters on this blog are autistic
all from one midget chromosome?
idiot!
I did not say systemization was bad.
Systemization is right brained and visual spatial.
Empathizing is left brained and verbal.
Women when pregnant have to protect themselves.
So they adapted to socialize.
Men can to but 9 months is not a thing for them.
The whole brain becomes involved then.
So left and right brain.
one confines the other side to take on those processes.
I would think empathizing would be right brain since it relates to emotions:
The brain is slower on the left side because it must find a step by step process as to your list. But then this means the right side is doing a faster process. The eyes look but the ears listen. So right is sensory and the left is symbolic. And if that is the case then empathy needs to be divided into two categories. Those who are system 1 thinkers and those who are system 2 thinkers. Left brain people will 2 and right brain will be 1 – Empathy on the left side is verbally smart, Empathy on the right side will be about taking actions in the immediate moment. (the prefrontal cortex on the left tells you when to come near and the right side tells you when to stop) Automatic actions then would require the right side as a people to people thing to be in constant motion where the verbal left side would be deliberate in what it was doing. In essence left-brain controls the process of sensory manipulation, right brain is faster so just acts with little deliberation. People who would be in consistent action mode would feel more but then this comes from sensory stimulations, constant verbal mode would make people get emotions from vocalization. Fast emotion and slow emotion, right and left brains.
men are more systematic but only autists are entirely systematic. So that’s where your misconception starts.
empathizing is something autists lack altogether.
Having social intelligence doesn’t make you autistic or otherwise it just plays a part.
I did not say men lack empathy.
I understand also most women are empathic but there are exceptions 2 that as well that’s why I brought it up
1492
in that year the best techne in sailing and war was european.
and in EVERYTHING ELSE!
FACT!
FACT!
FACT!
antikythera mechanism
+
greek philosophy, mathematics, astronomy, etc…
YES!
plato, euclid, ptolomey >>> an chinamen = sad.
YES!
plato, euclid, ptolemy >>> any chinamen = sad.
peepee’s theory is the west has been the best only because alexander.
FALSE!
when jim said “the west is the best” he meant the west of the US. it used to be the best. it did. so pipo went there. but lately they’ve been leaving.
athens invented democracy, not china. and it conquered the world.
one of the technologies wypipo brought to streetshitterstan was government.
maudslay is the most important person you’ve never heard of, but his virtuosity didn’t include government.
soros agrees.
Although Europe took civilization further than anywhere else, it’s one of the few places that never independently invented it:
the problem might be population size. When a population is big there will be instability in order 4 governance 2 happen.
on the other side you see that a small population will never reach its full potential.
let’s do a gedankenexperiment.
when you think of the smartest of the smartest of the smart…
whom do you think of? what face do you see?
it’s either a wypipo or a brahmin.
that’s it.
there’s a distribution…but there’s an elite.
The West is more individualistic so they’re better at associating one individual with their accomplishments. In more advanced societies people share the credit.
The problem with humanity is that they ask 4 credit even when they’re undeserving.
Selfishness is this aspect of our societal framework in a nutshell.
Anime empathizing doesn’t have 2 do with left or right brain that’s an oversimplification.
PP mentioned how autists can be creative so that’s the flaw in the logic.
I would like to know how empathizing works neurobiologically.
It might be that emotional control does it, which would be in the frontal lobes.
But I can see where people may become imbalanced emotionally and that is confused for empathizing.
Those persons who become excessively rigid also can be confused for autists, where x must = x and no other possibilities can be seen.
A spectreme must exist.
emotional persons cannot be objective.
and
rigid persons cannot see other options
–
Only objective persons who can see options can empathize correctly.
That means being able to listen and observe non-reactively,
and not prejudge what things are as having to be certain ways.
that’s a decent framework in regards of the topic!
PP what is the main objective of your blog? I think it’s 2 create political discussion but I could be biased
A place to keep track of my ideas
which of your ideas are your favorite or most meaningful 2 you?
PP do you think creativity and abstract abilities are as important as rationality and logic?
I think that’s a pretty important dichotomy because I think the West has an emphasis on one or the other whereas other places might look like having a holistic approach.
I would say for non-autistic people, logic is more important because you can always just copy others. Austics do not copy others so for them, creativity is more important.
ah that’s a very pragmatic and effective viewpoint I like that
another reason for colonialism was it solved domestic problems. it was a dumping ground for pipo who couldn’t make it in europe. lots of british came over as indentured servants or as convicts. but is there any evidence that british canadians or australians are dumber than the british who never left? btw, britain started as empire at home. ireland, scotland, and wales were all colonized by the english, who were themselves descendants of invaders of england, the anglo-saxons and normans and other vikings.
the jews were especially restive of those peoples the romans conquered. eventually the romans razed their temple as punishment.
According to Lynn, whites in America, Australia and the UK all have the exact same IQ.
probably with different deviations and/or educational learnings
relatability between things is how we form most of our worldviews. If we can link as many things as possible in order 4 a framework 2 emerge we can see that our mind will internalize that position of thought in a way that builds our understanding of things.
of course it is just a reinventing the wheel in many frameworks the only time this can deviate sensibly is by intellectually risky assertions and assumptions!
the point is: even if race or whatever is a stupid political group …
in a democracy all groups which people range themselves with should have SOME representation but not necessarily as such.
in other words: genuine rather than astro-turfed by capital idpol should be reflected in congress or whatever legislative body but NOT as idpol. for example LGBTXxyslmnop pipo don’t care if every legislator is a straight white man as long as they get protected class status. but blacks do care that they have some black legislators. if blacks were only 1.5% of the population ([redacted by pp, 2024-05-21]) they wouldn’t care.
I thought it was Kinsey who made up the 10% figure. But he was also a fag. And evil.
The fact that he’s still a venerated figure in popular culture is one of the clearest examples of the legacy media being controlled by Jews.
also i need to say that while the AIPAC/israel lobby has in fact totally corrupted the US congress…
the amount of money the US gives to israel and to egypt and other arab countries to make them nice to israel…
is less than trivial vs the total federal budget.
what radicalized so many pipo was the iraq war.
(which was VERY expensive.)
mike enoch and tucker carlson both.
but aside from the iraq war!
a BIG aside.
whether jewish influence on american government and culture has made life worse for americans is…
maybe, maybe not.
but as gandhi might’ve said:
why the fuck do you even have to argue this point?!
btw Gandhi won best picture. the jews approved it.
Gandhi and those who want the best are usually very intense about their beliefs.
unfortunately many of them get wrapped up in making a utopia and other things that are low in practicality because they don’t see the complexity of things after they’ve achieved so much.
as it turns out the US congress (house and senate) has blacks represented equal to their proportion of the population.
https://usafacts.org/articles/heres-how-the-number-of-black-americans-in-congress-has-tripled-over-30-years/
if that doesn’t do it for you then you have to accept you don’t live in a democracy.
but because low IQ black pipo voted against bernie in SC in 2020.
sad.
“but biddy biddy bum bum n shit n i hate wypipo n shit.” — peepee
FACT!
jews had ZERO influence in the USSR from 1927 to the end of the USSR in 1991.
why?
because socialism!
jewish influence = the power of the purse.
herzl said the same.
When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of all revolutionary parties; at the same time, when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse.
i was thinking how lurker was mentally retarded, autistic, and a baptist.
he equates equal potential with bank slatism.
both are false.
but that doesn’t matter.
what matters is lurker needs to be banned for low IQ and stupid religion.
What’s clear is you don’t know what you’re talking about but think you do. It’s called being a midwit.
You argued for tens of posts with PP about some statistical method for predicting IQ from occupation or something like that because you are drunk and don’t know what matters in life at this point. Sad.
Must be nice getting drunk alone while your state and country gets invaded because you believe in something that is more nuanced than “potential” or “blank slatism”.
Mug is the least likely 2 be a midwit here actually. I’d say you’re the most likely 2 be a midwit here not necessarily as a bad thing but if you’re neurotypical you definitely have a midwit style of thinking mixed with creativity and abstraction other midwits may not utilize because lower intelligence.
equal potential != bank slatism
Not sure how equal potential works.
Some people naturally want to smoke and drink alcohol
others don’t
which says something about there physiology and biology
–
some people think all day and some focus on bodily activities
that is less organically influenced and more environmental
so it is hard to seperate
–
but when you can control for all factors,
people at the Olympics have the best body trainers and food nutrition
people born at universities have the best teachers and learning materials
this matters allot
–
black slatistism have one thing wrong,
that natural talent does not exist
that savants do not exist
I cannot will myself to play video games that good
I can will myself to be average as everyone else can will themselves.
but they the above average will do something on a higher deviation
by will power maybe we could make some people do great at specific things. that is fact, but we get to the law of diminishing returns.
a person that needs no training will exist
that makes them general
not specialized
specialization has more 2 do with environment and general factors has more 2 do with innateness I think that’s something you mentioned that is right
Averageness is a specialization in and of itself it means you utilize little 2 no intuition on the matters at hand
I think the people benefitting from other cognitive abilities aside from just intelligence are the people at the tails of the bell shaped curve because they need 2 rely on something other than their intelligence otherwise they will fail 2 be understood
Being pedantic and asserting your correctness != being actually correct or saying anything useful
Also you have no coherent model for why everyone could have equal potential, or whatever you believe, you just assert it cause muh gut White Liberal feeling
Mug has good intuition higher than Pills at least and they’re comparable ages from what I assume.
Pill read 2 much in2 things or didn’t read at all there was no moderation in that guys ability 2 think.
True, Mugabe has a good intuition and good holistic thinking, but that’s what makes him annoying as a commenter because he can rarely clearly explain his point or his beliefs. He just says “HBD is false, blank slatism is false, genetic determinism is false, equal potential is false, you’re all stupid”.
A truly very intelligent person could explain in clear terms what they believe. Mugabe is intelligent but constantly overtaxes his wetware and abuses other people because he knows he isn’t smart enough to articulate what he wants to say.
I see what you’re saying. I was having the same problems as Mug does because there is so much disconnect between what I’m doing and what others expect.
The problem is that autists sound like artificial intelligence how it currently is.
especially on the internet. There’s no variation on how the conversation or discussion is structured
I’ve been let down by people because of Dunning Kruger.
Other people’s overvaluation has of themselves is what drives insufficient and radicalized evil in this world.
I am a humble individual I think humility when greatness comes is what drives the Ubermenschen category of being great.
Lurker thinks I am a narcissist but I know him 2 be an introvertedly disagreeable narcissist more so than myself.
he always thinks he’s right I don’t think that.
I am open minded and agreeable enough 2 practice the opposite.
my mom doesn’t believe anything I say because of her lack of trust.
She never trusted me so I went on breaking it whenever I could knowing it could never get worse!
“Other people’s overvaluation has of themselves is what drives insufficient and radicalized evil in this world.”
I agree with this and can see how you think disagreeability is a big problem. But disagreeability is basically the negative problem in front of your face, attacking you or insulting you. Agreeability is the negative problem that lurks underneath in its infinite acceptance of anything (vaccines, sexual immorality, cultural decay, getting fat and lazy, etc.). Not to mention, metaphysically speaking, disagreeability is more like constraints while agreeability is more like addition or construction. They are both necessary but humans naturally focus on the things that are different and novel rather than the countless things that are necessary for their existence.
I just think that disagreeability emphasizes individual responsibility such that the person being disagreeable is taking a large amount of risk in a situation so that they start relying on not seeing a holistic reasoning behind things.
agreeability should be about discerning what’s best and saying that they can take on a position that contributes in holism.
I like how you put the situation on its perspective. Disagreeability can either be a limiting factor or the upper limit itself. Agreeability is the stuff everything is made out of.
disagreeability then holds everything in place while agreeability is just a rearrangement of the order of things.
I think this is true because you can’t create anything new or destroy anything already existing in one sense.
so agreeability will broaden the stake we have in seeing what’s right or wrong. Partially accepting what’s in place is not agreeable it’s just a lack of conscientiousness 2 get out there and get something.
agreeableness will add alternatives 4 situations and build a relatively novel landscape because agreeability is about compounding a situation 2 your advantage!
I think narcissism is healthy but it requires us 2 go all in when being rational or objective which can be detrimental.
psychopathy is the main problem. I don’t think you’d want a person with psychopathy being in an interaction with you or anyone else.
empathy is about reading and reacting. Lurker is very empathic.
I wish I could be more empathic in my display but I think I lack the consideration of who I am.
PP what do you think of low hanging fruit? Do you think all has been discovered?
jains and parsis are very rich. richer than jews relative to the majority. beta israel made aliyah. supposedly eric weinstein’s wife is an indian jew.
same for overseas chinese in se asia. richer than jews relative to the majority of indonesia, the philippines, indo-china, thailand, etc.
but do they use their money to gain political power?
of course in latin america the unmixed europeans have all the money and all the political power. latin america is still the spanish colonial empire as the merely part whites effectively become part of the indigenous and ex-slave underclass.
are the lebanese of west africa or the indians of east africa resented? do they have political power? or do they just have lots of money relative to the majority?
one reason putin is so hated by neocons is he goyified the oligarchs and took all their political power. they are all his vassals. and jews went from 90% of oligarchs to 20%.
why would arab christians be the smartest group in israel?
if arabs as a whole are so much dumber because muh genes n shit yo, then how did religious affiliation select arab christians to have higher IQs than israeli jews? that’s some serious selection. it’s not like you have to take an IQ test become a christian. in fact, christianity loves retarded pipo.
it could be a class thing. maybe under the british mandate the rich arabs converted to christianity. maybe. but there have been christians in palestine from the beginning of christianity. just like there have been jews. in fact palestinian “arabs” are mostly descendants of jews. the arab conquest was not a mass movement of people from arabia to what would become the arab(ic speaking) world. it was a colonial project justified by the new religion of islam. compare spaniards. most of them are descended from muslims. moorish spain was 75% muslim iirc. 5% jewish.
In the modern West Christianity correlates negatively with IQ because we’ve advanced past religion but in the Middle East where almost everyone’s still religious, it may correlate positively if it’s less dumb than Islam
the disaster is the “maybe. maybe not.”
the disaster is the loss of popular sovereignty, aka the pipo of the country can take responsibility for their own successes and failures. they are accountable.
this is a legit objection.
lurker is such a narcissistic gay man.
mugabe could put everything he says in anal-philosophy terms but he knows that would be pointless because lurker-peepee STILL wouldn’t unnuhstan it.
Is it gay to post black men’s dick on IQ blogs?
“mugabe could put everything he says in anal-philosophy terms but he knows that would be pointless because lurker-peepee STILL wouldn’t unnuhstan it.”
It’s either that or you are a drunk without a coherent, well-thought out theory.
“the disaster is the loss of popular sovereignty, aka the pipo of the country can take responsibility for their own successes and failures. they are accountable.”
Fair enough and I would agree with that but it’s not exactly foolproof unless you take it for granted that nations deserve the right for accountability and self-determination. Given that humans are necessarily finite, flawed, and form symbiotic relationships with other types of humans (males with females, old with young, different types of laborers, etc.), we rely on a huge amount of pre-built knowledge, as well as in-built understanding of the world as humans regardless of culture or time, accountability and self-determination may be a fuzzy thing.
this is a legit objection.
lurker-peepee-tard: an objection to what?
mugabe: an objection to obscenely disproportionate power by any small minority ethnic group.
[redacted by pp, May 23, 2024]
why should any ethnic group have power. The world is a global place and geography is the only limiting factor there.
I don’t think people should use their time trying in achieving borders and walls just because it suits their power hungry agendas.
they won’t see where they’re headed in that way.
“capitalism has proved itself a self-contradictory, failed, evil ideology in americastan and in canuckistan“
It’s not free market capitalism. That’s the myth for us middle class losers. It’s a closed market finance economy monopoly with the “free market” providing the actual utility in the world, and the closed market siphoning everything off through endless consolidation to a few ultrawealthy of every possible actual mean of capital or real utility (land, real estate, weapons, lawmaking ability) through infinite money-printing and bail-outs and crooked back-door dealings.
But yes, capitalism is failed in that is far from a complete ideology.
Also, FYI all of my parents and grandparents were/are menial labor workers. Yet I’m still not a drunk like you! 😉
there’s not much else but having a productive lifestyle. I wish I wasn’t on this blog so much and could actually do stuff in real life.
I dunno if the others feel the same way because sometimes delusions of being important are developed from occupying some niche like this one.
however I’d choose differently.
I think we are allowed to feel bad for ourselves sometimes.
It is ok to feel bad if we know that we have pain inside.
There is no reason to blame ourselves,
but we need to understand we are hurt.
This realization will allow us to be ok.
actually plumbers can make a very good living. they’re the butt of jokes because they earn it. plumbing can be very nasty work.
plumbing is the highest paid of the trades except for obscure trades like elevator repair.
but it runs in families. this is the american version of caste. that is, it’s not just occupational prestige which is heritable, it’s the specific occupation. even for things no one should want to be, like plumber…or dentist.
peepee will say this is because muh genes n shit yo.
but really it’s just because familiarity and connections. if parents like what they do or don’t mind it and they know how to get into it they’ll tell their chirren about it. and the chirren think, “if it was good enough for my old man, it’s good enough for me.”
7-11 franchisee is a caste in the US where caste members are all named patel.
yeah. caste happens. but it’s got less to do with muh genes n shit yo than with familiarity, proximity, connections, etc..
Genes influence the occupational status of the caste and whether the occupation is verbal or spatial. Jews are just a caste but because the fields they dominate are verbal and thus theoretical as opposed to practical, they were seen as parasitic, and because instead of running 7-11, they run the most important institutions in society (media, academia, politics, the arts) they are resented as interlopers. This was especially true in Europe where they were seen as foreigners, but since America is largely a nation of foreigners, they’ve faced the least hostility there.
nice
head of government in the uk, scotland, and the RoI all desis.
head of microsoft, google, ibm…desis!
peepee: what it should’ve been all along because globalization n shit.
mugabe: seriously? that’s your explanation?
brahmin: we were the OG aryans n shit.
mugabe: FALSE! afghans are more aryan than brahmins.
brahmin: shut up racist!
yes!
but capitalism n shit = but communism n shit = gay!
disappeared = a loan translation from what happened to so many during the dirty war sponsored by the US deep state, the CIA. not an alex jones conspiracy theory. FACT!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty_War
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detenidos_Desaparecidos
americastan = you can have any democracy you like as long as it’s a fake and gay pseudo-democracy like america’s!
and the PRC under ding to xi.
the irish know!
fury will KO usyk in october.
growth happens faster under a planned system
but Marx said the system would be non-profit
why do systems work better as centralized?
because everyone has a job
what happens when the british empire collapsed?
lost the seas
why?
failed central plan.
could happen to china?
because where do jobs come from?
where does growth come from?
resource production
british could not consume
so they collapsed
when is it that russia fails
or china fails
to consume?
after America fails to consume?
Then Africa?
(?)
My question is the growth of CCP or Soviet Union sustainable? Would it be possible without the greater more liberal “free-market capitalist” states spurring on most cultural and technological development? Obviously, we know how much IP that the CCP steals, and how much they relentlessly pollute (and India).
Yeah, it’s more complicated than capitalism and liberal democracy vs. communism or socialism, but it’s even more complicated than that. All of this is forgetting that we are conscious beings nested in a metaphysical reality and any economic system that doesn’t take into account the way reality works or could work at the most fundamental level is bound to fail in some cases. And so they DO fail when society takes them to their logical extreme. (That’s why the love of money is evil, that’s why false idols are evil)
Consumption is the driving force of economics yes but it’s no longer a sustainable method.
How much are people going 2 buy b4 they realize this!
one day I sense that we will see the abandonment of useless things in our society.
they claim the useful is now useless and vice versa I’d give them a run 4 their money in seeing how these things will develop!