please place all off-topic comments for the week here. They will not be posted in the main articles.
Black national merit finalist GondwanaMan mentioned a study correlating pupil size with IQ but since it was too off-topic to in the previous thread, I thought I’d mention it here.
Pumpkin Person 
There is nothing god hates more than the drab grey of drone. Even if the drone followed good orders and made the world better, he would not be doing it for the right reasons. In the end god punishes drones far more than even the sickest ringmaster cultist. I think god to an extent punishes those who can’t pass the IQ test too harshly. Its reasonable, but harsh. God would rather a person of his own free will made the wrong choice and took the apple than done whatever god himself told him to do. That is the paradox at the heart of human existence. That even if you had a revelation and knew ‘the good’ and aligned yourself with what it entailed, you wouldn’t truly be doing ‘the good’ because you have to pass the test first. Even if you discover abstractly that you were put here to do ‘The Bad’, it seems to me far more people do ‘The Bad’ instinctively and without direction and thus, are rewarded for fulfilling their role in the simulation.
Morality is an illusion to most people in the same way the film The Matrix showed reality to be a simulation to most humans. Morality isn’t caring about african babies or adopting haitian refugess and proving to people you aren’t tribal. Morality is the ability to create a theory of what the good is and what the bad is and explain why it is objectively so. Even if 90% of people disagree with you, it is objective. It is not a popularity contest. It is not a feeling in your crotch in the morning. It is not what CNN says. It is not what is your best interest is. At the end of the day your actions will objectively make the world look better or look worse and you have to figure out which actions are doing this and which actions are not.
Most people INCLUDING YUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU have a PARTIAL view of the world and most of this partialities are not TOTALLY wrong if they are partial[ly correct] anyway.
People, on very avg, adopt one/and different perspective of same subject
BE OR NOT, that’s the question = binary thinking
About race, many people always find other issues more important:
social class [hypothetical example: ”i’m a white working class-student who always was discriminated in my school by my social condition and by my white classmates”];
biological/psychological caste [hypothetical example: ”i’m a white american student who are classified as ”weird” by most of my classmates and my best friends are non-whites]
maybe two of most important reasons many people has been easily self indoctrinated to believe in racial equality.
The best view is when you have a drop of both sides
Factual insensitivity in some and CORRECT cases, more in line with conservative thinking
empathetic in some and CORRECT cases, more in line with non-conservative and empathetic thinking.
Morality is not a illusion in the absolute way as you always suggest [and seems self contradict] but it’s the partiality taken as if it is the totality.
Summarizing
the best view is
in favor for death penalty to heinous crimes
but
also in favor for sensitivity things.
You have ”inside you” [no sexual jokes please] both the extreme of ideological views as well all the spectrum.
This is high adaptation itself.
Unfortunately too kind people tend to be
excessively tamed
And many too bad people tend to be
quite astute/bright.
this is an ability very few have. there was a line, “you don’t get to decide what’s right and wrong.” this can be taken in two ways:
1. obey the morals of the tribe. do whatever it allows you to get away with. don’t think.
2. right and wrong are objective features of the world, aka moral realism.
If the mental is real and the mind can decern right from wrong then moral realism must perceive reality in terms of right and wrong. We can see right and wrong. It is objective and the mind knows it.
But just because the mind can see it and observation makes morality emperically objective does not mean everyone has the same intelligence to see it.
People who voted for donald trump like this scene.
Like is a subjective term.
The guy had nerd rage so I felt less anxiety because I know the angry nerd guys do not get hurt usually. I’ve seen too many movies where shit just happens and it freaks me out. I cannot watch normal movies where shit like this happens. High empathy is a curse.
There is an educational (physics) toy that has been on the market for roughly twenty-five years; it’s called The Levitron®. I recall that, as of the mid-‘90s, approximately one-half million had been sold. I’m guessing it would be safe to say that sales over the interim have numbered in the millions. Interestingly, only a relative few are even aware of the toy and/or the possibility of levitating one permanent magnet above another, most of them likely residents of “outer-Geekdom” (I use the term un-disparagingly – I’m a part-time resident). Moreover, it seems The Levitron’s sliver of a market has all but dried up in recent years. Perhaps it has been diverted to other, more dazzling, technologies, or perhaps most have become disenchanted given the inherent difficulties associated with the toy’s operation; nevertheless, I think there is a sizeable market remaining to be tapped. To the point: a few months back, I received a patent on, what I like to think of as, an “evolved Levitron”, one that resolves all of said difficulties. And, although I am pursuing a few avenues directed to the selling of that patent, I would like to hear a detached, dispassionate, unvarnished, and knowledgeable perspective on how best to proceed. Quite frankly, my long-held distaste for business (and perhaps a resultant incapacity) could greatly diminish my prospects for deriving gains commensurate with my investment in terms of hours and patent-purchasing dollars. Yes, I’m the one who posted his Mega Test score some time ago. For my purposes, given my present circumstances, that result means little. Any thoughts?
Too bad no one responded.
I don’t have any good ideas either.
That’s ok, thanks. I doubt that it would have generated much discussion (if any), but it was posted quite some time after submission; it was flagged as spam. As a result, it was buried. I could resubmit, but I’ll let it go.
The ubermensch was not a slave the ubermensch needed no slaves. The ubermensch stood on his own without anyone. Facing all challenges. The weak need slaves. The weak are slaves.
beyond the master, slave morality is the ubermensch
both are weak only the ubermensch is strong
so there’s this great debate…”did they flee or were they expelled?”
no one flees unless he’s expelled.
fuck!
it’s a distinction without a difference
just like affirmative action vs quotas.
the low IQ of lawyers is a yuge problem.
it depends on what the meaning of “is” is.
no it doesn’t you fucking autist!
i can see how some sumo would be attractive to dealwithit.
1. their fat is “subcutaneous” not “visceral”. they are healthy as long as they’re “working”. some 39 year old did very well in the january yusho.
2. they are very distinct from all other professional athletes.
3. they do have yuge muscle mass, especially in the lower body.
i should do a long post on the lebanese.
but some of these lebanese are actually greeks? is taleb the only example?
two great organic chemists: Elias James Core, K. C. Nicolaou
…Corey…
it seems the christian lebanese do better than the muslim lebanese. sad!
generate from within.
https://youtu.be/TtGY4G7II6s
organic synthesis not only requires high PIQ, it also requires a fantastic “work ethic”.
that is, as my advisor said, “nights and week-ends aren’t holidays.”
so it’s both high PIQ and hard work.
maybe this is why the ashkenazim are conspicuously under-represented and japanese and germans (inter alia) over-represented among the great synthetic organic chemists.
Jews work hard, just not where it’s needed
It’s funny too see Philosopher accusing me of being an idiot for suspecting Jimmy and Fenoopy to be the same person. What would he thinks of Jimmy saying on RR’s blog that Fenoopy is actually PP’s sockpuppet trying to fool readers into thinking he is Jimmy ? So even Jimmy recognize the blatant similary between himself and Fenoopy. He just put it on a deliberate attempt from PP to pass for him.
Fenoopy appeared shortly before i was banned. In fact, I was banned after i said that i knew who fenoopy was
clearly my ban was a pre-emptive strike to prevent me outing him
whenever Lyrion/truthteller or his other sock puppets would put a little heat under PPs feet he would start making fenoopy sound like me
examples:
Saying that he had a software engineering background
saying that he worked in the U.K
saying that he was an American
saying things about jews and asians that sound exactly like something i would say even if those statements would completely contradict his previous pro-jew/asian statements
Even Fenoopy himself.
There’s definitely a large similarity, but I assure you it’s coincidental. France often comes up and Algeria is over a century of it’s history. That and the reputation North Africans have is primarily from France and Holland where the economic immigrants are, people outside these countries aren’t subjected to tcharmil so usually have a favorable or neutral opinion.
There are indeed so many coincidences it’s no longer a coincidence, but what can I say, I’m at a loss. I’m not playing a joke on you or trying to see how far this can go, genuinely, I am not Jimmy.
Jimmy/Fenoopy was smart enough to see it that’s why he didn’t try to deny the obvious similarities I was pointing out which would have make him look ridiculous and bring even more suspicion.
You are the idiot here.
I think even it you’re correct, nobody cares about this supposed deliberate double characterization.
As a reminder :
Fenoopy said :
i’m berber not arab, so i don’t know much about them. i’m not particularly fond of arabs, but neither am i particularly fond of french people.
french people killed 10% of the population of my tribe in the independence war, so i can’t say i’m particularly fond of you french, either. i can travel to my village in kabylia and see the graves of the people you killed all with my family name written there on the stones.
from my perspective it’s the french who’re callous and without empathy. i only have to look at that psychopath banker macron.
Jimmy said :
If you watch documentaries about French colonialism you’ll see pictures of French soldiers beheading algerians and sticking their heads on spikes and placing them at the gates of cities.
i am not saying that the french are tough people . They are certainly not. All i’m saying is that the french can be extremely vicious killers when their victim is weak.
The french showed their true colors during the colonial days when they had defenseless africans who couldn’t fight back.
By global standards the french are cowards but they are not feminine like Afro.
oh and how does it feel to be an african who calls himself french while knowing about all of the atrocities committed by France in Africa?
And :
It all kicked off after the english hooligans saw some berbers and shouted ” Where is ISIS”
The english hooligans thought that the berbers would run away but instead they went up to them and things got very messy.
It was hilarious to see the police having to protect the english.
Why a US white supremacist would get so emotional about Algeria’s colonization and stand with the mainstream media blaming white as vicious barbarians for all the horrors they did in the past to poor innocent people ? Why would he be delighted to see white hooligans being humiliated by Berbers ? Make absolutely no sense.
What Jimmy wrote is just a subtler version of what I hear from french algerians all the time : “hahaha we beat your ass in the street you white faggots” and when they are asked about their barbarian behaviour they just whine “huh that’s payback from what u evil white people did to our ancestors”
The Importance of a Breakdown
I dont think anybody was that desperate to do that to themselves.
Nazis?
Oh yes. I thought he meant…nm.
haha
generate from within.
Directing awareness not controlling effort is the answer to peace of mind. Letting go and simple observing allows increased perception. You can feel your brain talk to itself. You become perceptive. Pain is released.
You feel your feelings and let go of them.
RR and Afro talk about this “social class causing IQ” theory as it was a proven fact. Afro’s definition of intelligence is how quick your brain can process information and how quick it can make an appropriate response. According to this definition every single task involving brain activity should be a measure of intelligence (even unprecise). If 2 people with the exact same cultural background were ask to do matrices then the smartest one, the one with the fastest, most powerful, most efficient brain would be the first to come up with the solution.
So the question I ask, given that both cultural background and brainpower play a role in every task involving using your brain, how do you know the cultural part is much more important and how do you measure it ?
“If 2 people with the exact same cultural background were ask to do matrices then the smartest one, the one with the fastest, most powerful, most efficient brain would be the first to come up with the solution.”
People experience ‘the same’ environments in the same way? Either way the Raven isn’t construct valid.
“given that both cultural background and brainpower play a role in every task involving using your brain, how do you know the cultural part is much more important and how do you measure it ?”
Are IQ tests removed from human culture?
P1) All tests are designed by humans.
P2) All humans have culture.
C) Therefore all tests have some sort of cultural bias in some way.
Not even getting to other factors that affect test performance.
Daily reminder that IQ tests aren’t construct valid. No Melo. P-FIT isn’t construct validity.
using rr’s “logic” the beauty of italian women has no construct validity and humans do not differ in beauty. andaman pygmy women are just as beautiful as italian women. QED.
Is there a ‘beauty test’?
there could be.
How?
same as with “smart”. the judgement is subjective, but the criteria can predict the judgement. the best test predicts the distribution of judgements best or certain parameters of that distribution.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698907005032
if rr were alive before 1969 he would say, “i don’t know if the moon is made of green cheese or made of rock, therefore the moon doesn’t exist.”
RR your argument implies that all artefacts made by human are inherently biased and the cause would be that human having a culture, the artefacts are culturally biased. In terms of logic, it’s pure void. The property of the conceiver of an artefact is not necessarily the property of the object (the conceptor is made of water, not the test). I think formal presentation of arguments in social sciences is often misleading . But here, it is an extreme case.
You are not answering my question so let me reformulate. What are the evidences that IQ tests don’t measure anything real ? All of what you are saying are not evidences. How the fact that an IQ test is man-made disqualify it as a (imperfect) measure of intelligence ?
Take 2 people and make them fight in a cage. Who will win ? Probably the one with the most fighting experience. But nobody will deny that there are natural caracteristics such as height, strenght, personality, mental quickness that will be involved in the final result.
When someone is performing a mental task such as an IQ test his brain is more active than when he is doing nothing. Why is it so crazy to say that one person’s success on a task involving the brain will partly depend on how powerful his brain is just like his succes on a task involving physical strenght will partly depend on how powerful his muscles are.
Denying this is completly anti-science.
Attempt to rebut the argument. Logical arguments are evidence.
rr is the type of people who use simple and unsubstantiated sentences as ”logical arguments”
”Logical arguments are evidence”
jesus christ!!!!!!
“rr is the type of people who use simple and unsubstantiated sentences as ”logical arguments””
What is unsubstantiated? That tests are designed by humans? Or all humans have culture? Or is the conclusion that all tests have some sort of cultural bias in some way unsubstantiated? Please, enlighten me.
P1) All tests are designed by humans.
P2) All humans have culture.
C) Therefore all tests have some sort of cultural bias in some way.
Also are logical arguments not evidence? Why or why not?
Very stupid questions, are you using a smartphone and can’t think carefully [or copy from..] in smart questions*
”That tests are designed by humans? Or all humans have culture?”
Oi*
These tests are designed by monkeys,
No, just whites.
”C) Therefore all tests have some sort of cultural bias in some way.”
And it’s not a EVIDENCE that they are totally biased in this way.
”Also are logical arguments not evidence? Why or why not?”
When ”we” have a evidence of something, arguments become potentially unecessary.
Arguments are often used to defend certain point of view.
Logical arguments are based on
non-magic thinking [from irreligion or mythology to IDEOLOGY]
certain point of view, hypothesis or theory.
How are they stupid questions? You said that the premises and conclusion was unsubstantiated. P1, P1, or C, which is unsubstantiated?
The conclusion logically follows from the two premises. It’s a sound, valid argument. You’ve given no rebuttal.
Logical arguments are evidence.
http://thinkingmatters.org.nz/2010/05/are-logical-arguments-evidence/
The same link ever***
rr have a kind of selective blindness, very ”special” one.
he ALWAYS don’t answer our comments directly…
Logical ARGUMENTS don’t need to be FACTUALLY correct, at priori, they need to sound logical as most of your proto-arguments.
Argument: In logic and philosophy, an argument is a series of statements typically used to persuade someone of something or to present reasons for accepting a conclusion.
Evidence: Evidence, broadly construed, is anything presented in support of an assertion.[1] This support may be strong or weak. The strongest type of evidence is that which provides direct proof of the truth of an assertion. At the other extreme is evidence that is merely consistent with an assertion but does not rule out other, contradictory assertions, as in circumstantial evidence.
In law, rules of evidence govern the types of evidence that are admissible in a legal proceeding. Types of legal evidence include testimony, documentary evidence,[2] and physical evidence.[3] The parts of a legal case which are not in controversy are known, in general, as the “facts of the case.” Beyond any facts that are undisputed, a judge or jury is usually tasked with being a trier of fact for the other issues of a case. Evidence and rules are used to decide questions of fact that are disputed, some of which may be determined by the legal burden of proof relevant to the case. Evidence in certain cases (e.g. capital crimes) must be more compelling than in other situations (e.g. minor civil disputes), which drastically affects the quality and quantity of evidence necessary to decide a case.
Scientific evidence consists of observations and experimental results that serve to support, refute, or modify a scientific hypothesis or theory, when collected and interpreted in accordance with the scientific method.
In philosophy, the study of evidence is closely tied to epistemology, which considers the nature of knowledge and how it can be acquired.
source: wiki
This is the basic of semantics and you seems never will grasp this in your life because you’re totally dependent to manipulate semantics to advance in any step your madness.
Arguments and evidences are part of the same process but not the same thing just like the day and the afternoon.
I even don’t know why i still waste my time with such a person as you…
It’s so absurd i can’t believe you’re doing this by real. if yes, so it’s sky high stupidity.
“The same link ever***”
I can count on one hand the number of times I’ve used this link.
“he ALWAYS don’t answer our comments directly…”
I asked you to point out the flawed logic in my argument and you did not.
“This is the basic of semantics and you seems never will grasp this in your life because you’re totally dependent to manipulate semantics to advance in any step your madness.”
Is this a refutation of my argument? Thanks for the wiki article but I’m well aware of all that.
“Arguments and evidences are part of the same process but not the same thing just like the day and the afternoon.”
Logical arguments are evidence. The conclusion follows from the premised. If the premises are valid and the conclusion is sound then it’s a non-fallacious argument and the argument attempts to ‘prove’ the premises laid out.
“I even don’t know why i still waste my time with such a person as you…”
So don’t talk to me.
You’re not aware of yourself, like a nonhuman animal.
”So don’t talk to me.”
Thank you.
I even don’t know why i still waste my time with such a person as you…
because you like italian men.
RR has to be the most illogical person in human history who kept saying he was the only logical person. If what RR was saying made any sense then every single major corporation, law firm, millitary and government agency would stop using IQ tests and start using a hat with peoples names folded into paper in it to pick people. I don’t think anyone ever claimed IQ tests were perfect measurements. I even say they don’t measure social or musical or creative intelligence and am pretty certain many people who score high in them are retarded in an absolute sense like Warren Buffet or Bill Gates – but if you asked me who was going to do better at reading and math and spatial manipulation on average I would say the person that got high scores. Whether the scores are measuring ‘culture’ or IQ is somewhat irrelevant because you need IQ to adapt to ‘culture’. This is just like the time RR said that if he saw someone shoot someone in the face with a shotgun, he would need proof he wasn’t in the Matrix.
”because you like italian men.”
I’m sapiosexual too, no!!
And surprise, rr typos are exceptionally common among ”acadanemics”
RR and Afro talk about this “social class causing IQ” theory as it was a proven fact.
It is a proven fact, because tests are designed with indices of social class as benchmarks. And since we know that increasing IQ by practicing IQ tests doesn’t make people better learners and thinkers, it is absolutely a proven fact that IQ does not measure intelligence as a causal variable of learning a thinking ability.
Psychologists handwave this fact because they aren’t scientists. Saying something is only accurately measured at first trial completely goes against measurement theory.
Afro’s definition of intelligence is how quick your brain can process information and how quick it can make an appropriate response.
Accuracy is more important than quickness, but time constraints make the decision-making process tougher, so the quicker one can make an accurate decision, the smarter they likely are.
And IQ tests don’t measure rational decision making:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/rational-and-irrational-thought-the-thinking-that-iq-tests-miss/
That’s a huge problem, because a decision can only lead to successful outcomes in the real world if it is rational. And only luck can save you from the consequences of a bad decision.
According to this definition every single task involving brain activity should be a measure of intelligence (even unprecise)
Yes, every conscious action is a manifestation of intelligence. Why would you disagree?
i’m surprised afro didn’t mention other successful african countries like rwanda, zimbabwe, and south africa.
peepee denies the black man sexiness because she wants to believe she has no competition for black women.
IQ tests predict job performance better than anything else, but they are still not very good predictors.
if rr really thinks there aren’t smart people and dumb people that’s fine.
i agree with afro. the only reason why the man keeps the black man down is the man knows that if he didn’t keep the black man down the black man would take all the man’s hos with his black man sexiness.
Mug of Pee claims to be very good looking. He could be having sex with black men every night, but sadly he’s in such deep denial that he’d rather die a virgin than admit to himself that he’s gay. As for black men being sexy, sadly through much of history black men were seen as disgusting looking because of the stereotypical black skin, prognathous face, big lips, broad flat nose and kinky hair while the white male was considered the standard of male perfection. There’s a reason Michael Jackson butchered and bleached himself. I once heard an Indian woman say that if a black sits next to her on the bus, she just can’t stand it. She has to get up and move. And while non-blacks have long envied their large penises, at the same time this was considered animalistic.
While today there’s no net disadvantage to being black, at least not in Western countries, in the 1980s it was considered so incredibly bad. Blacks wouldn’t even admit they were black, instead saying they were mixed or Puerto Rican. I remember seeing a black for the first time in the first grade. Some of the kids were so traumatized that the teacher had a talk with us explaining what we had just seen.
Mugabe: (Make alien to Japan)
Like alien was a sexual orientation? or something?
I feel better, after being alone and suppressed. uncreative, worthless.
Mad at everyone because of all the stupidity that I have no control in my life.
I cannot handle this with my condition but suddenly perception changed.
Things are untangling, the pain is going away, I am not so stuck.
I just let my brain self-organize itself and sometimes almost a 4K TV.
It is still hard to hold thoughts in the forehead but it is unwinding.
Music is so deep.
not ten years.
6 months
“I remember seeing a black for the first time in the first grade. Some of the kids were so traumatized that the teacher had a talk with us explaining what we had just seen.”
Hahahahaha. Pumpkin has the best anecdotes.
I have that reaction to watching Oprah even today.
Sexually attractive sometime is not the same than good-looking
I already said this here:
there are basically ”two types”, at priori, of good looking
sexually attractive
and
good looking
there are people who are good looking but not exactly sexually attractive, and people who are sexually attractive but not good looking
manly men who no have exactly a baby face is a very good example
or you have a exagerated sexual features which tend to be attractive to another sex/or to same sex
or you just have a good ”plastic”
In terms of sexual attractivity i don’t black men are on avg the most attractive but i think they are in similar leves to white men exactly because their:
personality [on avg, hyper masculine]
exagerated sexual features [or ”exagerated”]
In terms of appearance seems madness to deny the superiority of white race. Yes, a variable tons of skin color, from the bronze to the very pale, is often beautiful. A beautiful red haired woman is not just a good looking woman as many non white but exquisite.
It’s difficult to deny, only if you are a ”logical guy” as someone here, that a blonde hair is beautiful to see, or a combination of pale skin and dark hair.
jeesus
reinventing english
new words for you
”leves”
”sometime”
and so on..
thank god, i no have attention at all, il
PP must live in a parallel reality.
A number of countries have become popular destinations for female sex tourism, including Southern Europe (mainly in Greece, Italy, Malta, Cyprus, Spain and Portugal); the Caribbean (Barbados, Dominican Republic, Haiti, and Jamaica); Brazil, Egypt, Turkey, Southeast Asia, and Phuket in Thailand); and Gambia, Senegal and Kenya in Africa.[9][verification needed] Other popular destinations include Bulgaria, Croatia, Lebanon, Morocco, Jordan, Armenia, Albania, Fiji, Colombia and Costa Rica.[10] Bali in Indonesia is the only destination where females from Western Europe, Japan and Australia engages in sex tourism with male locals.[11][dead link] The evidence suggests that notional stereotypes among Western women about countries that are ‘reputed’ to have an abundance of conventionally sexually attractive and visually and aesthetically pleasing young men, become popular destinations for female sex tourism[citation needed]. Thus, countries of the Mediterranean region, which have the reputation of men resembling the Latin Lover stereotype, figure prominently among female sex tourism destinations[citation needed].
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_sex_tourism#Destinations
What I can say from my experience is that while most white women wouldn’t find black men more attractive on average, they’d agree that there is a higher share of both extremely attractive and extremely ugly black dudes.
Wow that’s horrible. Canadians I’m sure had some exposure to black celebrities so it couldn’t have been that shocking. Or maybe things were that different in the 80s in Canada.
Things were very different in the U.S. in the 1980s too. The last several decades have seen massive social change.
This story is fake, obviously. Only a bunch of deeply inbred retards would react like that.
When I was a child in the 90s, me and my sisters were the only blacks in my area and there were very few black celebrities or black people in general in France.
And the kids were super-nice, all the boys wanted me on their team to play soccer and the girls were always asking me to be their boo. They touched my hair with amazement and the rumor said I was black because I fell in a bath of chocolate at birth .
PP just likes to portray blacks as savage beasts and pretend that people share innately share his rejection of black features.
no the story’s true (to the best of my memory & understanding; I was 6) and such anecdotes could be multiplied a hundred-fold. You’ve just lived an exceptionally privileged & atypical life, and on top of that you’re in deep denial. I’m not saying the world is like that today. the poll you cited from pew shows how much progress we’ve made in just the last several decades.
and I also knew a black girl in university who said when she saw a white for the first time, she thought it was so ugly. So it doesn’t necessarily have anything to do with people innately rejecting black features, just shock and fear of the unfamiliar.
no the story’s true (to the best of my memory & understanding; I was 6) and such anecdotes could be multiplied a hundred-fold.
No, your story is fake, just like the Indian cab driver one the other day. That some lone black kids have been the target of racist bullying is a commonly reported fact, that some white kids would have been traumatized by the sight of a black kid is not even thinkable. Kids meet novelty with curiosity and there is nothing scary about blacks when you aren’t aware of negative stereotypes.
I frequently see babies staring, then eventually smiling at me in their stroller instead of crying like you think would be the natural reaction.
You’ve just lived an exceptionally privileged & atypical life, and on top of that you’re in deep denial.
Denial of privilege or racism? I’m very woke on social and racial issues so I can’t see what denial you’re referring to.
the poll you cited from pew shows how much progress we’ve made in just the last several decades.
This was an American poll, that must be interpreted in the American cultural context of 400 years of constantly denying the humanity of black people, and especially black men. Canada, on the contrary, is the country where black American slaves used to find freedom and shelter and where race relations have always been much smoother.
I’m very woke
Hahaha! you’re such a cliché.
You’re very wrong afro. More true stories you wont believe:
1) When my friend was a little kid, he turned to the black man behind him in the lineup at the store and asked “are you bad?”
“No son,” the man replied. “Just black”
“I’m so sorry,” his embarrassed mother said
2) When I took the WISC-R as a kid, the teacher who recommended me for testing raved that the Indian woman (who dressed in saris & sandals even in the snow) was the best in the business. “Sometimes the kindergarten kids she has to take away for testing are so scared of her they cry, but she puts them right at ease.”
LMAO! You’re just passing for an idiot.
Afro is in hardcore denial, everyone has a bias, but at the very least I am very aware of the behavior of French-Algerians, I don’t outright deny the stereotype exists
“I frequently see babies staring, then eventually smiling at me in their stroller instead of crying like you think would be the natural reaction. ”
GAHAHAHAH
I don’t think Pumpkin is lying at all. People act in retarded ways when they’re around people they are unfamiliar with; people from non-diverse backgrounds are especially prone to acting this way. Many of my friends growing up were white, and I would go to their houses all the time, and there would be no problem. And keep in mind this was in the South in the 90s.
Howver, sometimes we would have competitions in different parts of the state (math team, quiz team, chess team, even though I sucked at chess and still do now). The teams from other parts of the state, particularly the rural northern hillbilly parts (back when I lived in that state) would quite obviously avoid conversing with our team. The parents and the students wouldn’t even look us in the eyes, even though we were in the same room! And there were only a few minorities on these teams besides me (including another really smart black guy and a bunch of Asians and one guy who I think was some sort of Hispanic.). But it was obvious they were “frightened” of our super-diverse academic teams.
Sad!
“I’m very woke on social and racial issues so I can’t see what denial you’re referring to.”
Afro is a jewish man trolling us.
as i have said many times.
what afro looks like irl:
sad!
I don’t think Pumpkin is lying at all. People act in retarded ways when they’re around people they are unfamiliar with
Of course he’s lying. What he’s describing is a class where the majority of the pupils didn’t know that black people existed so the teacher had to explain them. That’s only imaginable in special school for deeply mentally impaired kids.
You know what? Even if there was literally a talking monkey in the room, the kids would love it instead of fearing it.
The parents and the students wouldn’t even look us in the eyes, even though we were in the same room! And there were only a few minorities on these teams besides me
Curiosity/hostility are some normal reactions to something unfamiliar. But when even at the peak of Jim Crow racism, the wealthy southern Whites who left their babies under the care of ugly and fat black nannies weren’t thinking for a second that it would traumatize their kids.
And you know very well that no parent worries that the sight of black people or other would terrorize their kids.
His story makes no sense.
Of course he’s lying. What he’s describing is a class where the majority of the pupils didn’t know that black people existed so the teacher had to explain them. That’s only imaginable in special school for deeply mentally impaired kids.
You know what? Even if there was literally a talking monkey in the room, the kids would love it instead of fearing it.
I can’t speak for the majority of students, but I don’t recall ever seeing a black person before then, certainly not that black. I personally don’t recall feeling any fear, just curiosity and fascination but I do remember the teacher talking to us about it afterward, so it must have been an issue for some of the class.
It’s not as uncommon as you think:
Why is my 3 year old daughter afraid of black people?…Children, especially very young children, often fear the unknown, and people who look or act differently are part of that unknown. I suggest you go out of your way to introduce her to people who are different in appearance, aiming for variety.
To many parents’ surprise, white children aged between five and eight often express racial prejudice. In new research, my colleague and I found that young white children’s implicit racial attitudes also favoured pictures of unknown white children over unknown black children…In three studies conducted in Toronto, Canada, 359 white children aged between five to 12-years-old completed two different tests of implicit racial bias.
If this was still an issue for Canadian kids in 2017, imagine what it was like in the 1980s when kids had much less exposure to other races.
I can’t speak for the majority of students, but I don’t recall ever seeing a black person before then, certainly not that black. I personally don’t recall feeling any fear, just curiosity and fascination but I do remember the teacher talking to us about it afterward, so it must have been an issue for some of the class.
No, what you’ve described in the original version of your story is a climate of general panic and trauma. Not a few kids just naturally being puzzled by a difference of this kind.
And for you to have a black classmate as early as the first grade when schools are much smaller means your area was already quite diverse, unless the kid was adopted. So it couldn’t have been the first time anyone saw a black person.
It’s not as uncommon as you think:
I can also quote mine until the 10th page of google search results and come up with a kid that’s afraid of potatoes.
If this was still an issue for Canadian kids in 2017, imagine what it was like in the 1980s when kids had much less exposure to other races.
Implicit bias =/= fear. The parents and the kid in the video below disagree and they’re all extremely cute.
No, what you’ve described in the original version of your story is a climate of general panic and trauma.
No, I said some of the kids were traumatized. It doesn’t take much to scare a six-year-old. Some kids cry when they see clowns or men dressed up like Santa, and you think it’s far fetched that some white kids might be scared by seeing an extremely black skinned person for the first time?
And for you to have a black classmate as early as the first grade when schools are much smaller means your area was already quite diverse, unless the kid was adopted. So it couldn’t have been the first time anyone saw a black person.
So because I had a single black classmate, the community must have been teaming with black folks? Non-sequitur. Don’t know if she was adopted, but she had moved there from Africa.
I can also quote mine until the 10th page of google search results and come up with a kid that’s afraid of potatoes.
It’s more than a single isolated quote:
Sometimes children may exhibit a phobia towards people of different races. This is typically seen in small children who are preschool age or younger. Such fears do not mean your child is an evil racist. It means the circuitry in their brain that causes all people to be somewhat suspicious of those outside one’s own group is especially hyperactive. However, if left unchecked, this fear can morph into something uglier.
Implicit bias =/= fear.
But it can equal fear, as they’re closely related:
The link between social fear and racial stereotypes fits with the results of previous brain-scanning studies. In people with Williams syndrome, the amygdala, a part of the brain involved in processing emotional memories, is far less reactive to threatening social situations. The connections between the amygdala and the fusiform face area, which is specialised for recognising faces, are also unusually weak.The same areas might play a role in understanding information about people’s race: the fusiform face area tends to be more active when we look at people from the same ethnic group; and one study found that the amygdala is more active when both white and black people look at black faces. This will, of course, need to be tested in more experiments.
No, I said some of the kids were traumatized. It doesn’t take much to scare a six-year-old. Some kids cry when they see clowns or men dressed up like Santa, and you think it’s far fetched that some white kids might be scared by seeing an extremely black skinned person for the first time?
Yes, it is. When kids are afraid of clowns and santa, they are primarily impressed by the size and the extremely weird looks. When kids see another kid of their size, they are not terrified by his skin color.
So because I had a single black classmate, the community must have been teaming with black folks?
Not teaming with black folks, but they would have seen black people at the mall, at the park or on the street at least a few times in their life. So they would have known that some people were black without having a teacher explaining it to them.
Don’t know if she was adopted, but she had moved there from Africa.
So you had a classmate but you never knew who her parents were, never saw her family at school Christmas shows or birthday parties? Please…
It’s more than a single isolated quote:
I told you I can quote mine and find stories about fear of potatoes and then make up a story with traumatized kids who saw a potato for the first time.
The link between social fear and racial stereotypes fits with the results of previous brain-scanning studies…
So you were in a school for kids with amygdala impairment.
Yes, it is. When kids are afraid of clowns and santa, they are primarily impressed by the size and the extremely weird looks. When kids see another kid of their size, they are not terrified by his skin color.
No many kids are often fragile little sissies. They’ll even cower at something smaller than them if they find it scary.
Not teaming with black folks, but they would have seen black people at the mall, at the park or on the street at least a few times in their life. So they would have known that some people were black without having a teacher explaining it to them.
Not that black. This girl was Sudanese color or at least that’s how I remember her.
So you had a classmate but you never knew who her parents were, never saw her family at school Christmas shows or birthday parties? Please…
I don’t think she (or her older sibling) stayed at our school that long. It’s possible I saw her parents at the Christmas concert the kids would put on for the community but there would have been so many adults attending and it was so long ago I don’t recall.
I told you I can quote mine and find stories about fear of potatoes and then make up a story with traumatized kids who saw a potato for the first time.
Oh get real, you know that’s a false equivalency. Here’s a youtube video of black kids seeing whites for the first time. Their first reaction is to run away in fear:
So you were in a school for kids with amygdala impairment.
If you read the link you’d know it’s just the opposite. Those with amygdala impairment lack fear of others.
No many kids are often fragile little sissies. They’ll even cower at something smaller than them if they find it scary.
No, you’re just projecting your own fearfulness.
Not that black. This girl was Sudanese color or at least that’s how I remember her.
What’s the difference once you’ve already seen a brown-skinned person?
I don’t think she (or her older sibling) stayed at our school that long.
Alright, so they literally expelled her and her siblings in order to avoid more panic in the school.
Oh get real, you know that’s a false equivalency. Here’s a youtube video of black kids seeing whites for the first time. Their first reaction is to run away in fear:
They are clearly not traumatized, they are curious and a bit distrustful like kids always are when they encounter something new (especially if it’s in the middle of nowhere like this). But they clearly aren’t shocked so that someone would have to explain them what they’ve just seen. They must be smarter than your classmates.
If you read the link you’d know it’s just the opposite. Those with amygdala impairment lack fear of others.
So you were in a school for hyper-excitable amygdala kids.
No, you’re just projecting your own fearfulness.
No kids are literally afraid of their own shadows:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJ0hNEw6EPo
Not that black. This girl was Sudanese color or at least that’s how I remember her.
What’s the difference once you’ve already seen a brown-skinned person?
Kind of like the difference between a Southern European and an Albino.
Alright, so they literally expelled her and her siblings in order to avoid more panic in the school.
She probably just moved. Often when people come from another country, they have a temporary residence before they have a permanent one. The community was generally pretty liberal on racial issues. I only recall 4 “racist” teachers in my entire life and all were in high school (though I attended several high schools so got to meet a lot of teachers). Afro wont believe any of this but the 4 were:
a) 9th grade gay math teacher who mocked the black community by calling his fellow whites “brother”.
b) 11th grade chemistry teacher who implied that there’s so much natural selection in Africa that they might “catch up”
c) Grade 12 law teacher: anti-Semite who was pissed that he always got stuck teaching the Somali students because the administration hated him.
d) Guidance councillor who confessed to me she couldn’t “read” black teenagers and complained about all the Chinese people entering the room, though she was older than God, and did poorly on the WAIS as a university undergrad (“you can’t be that stupid” the psychologist told her every time she failed an item)
They are clearly not traumatized, they are curious and a bit distrustful like kids always are when they encounter something new (especially if it’s in the middle of nowhere like this). But they clearly aren’t shocked so that someone would have to explain them what they’ve just seen. They must be smarter than your classmates.
If a responsible adult from their community witnessed their reactions, she would probably talk to them about it after, just to make sure they were okay.
So you were in a school for hyper-excitable amygdala kids.
There’s always a few easily scared kids in every class
No kids are literally afraid of their own shadows:
These aren’t school aged children, they’re barely walking. If your classmates had these reactions, you were really in a special needs school.
Kind of like the difference between a Southern European and an Albino.
So that’s nothing to cause trauma in a normally developing child.
The community was generally pretty liberal on racial issues. I only recall 4 “racist” teachers in my entire life and all were in high school (though I attended several high schools so got to meet a lot of teachers). Afro wont believe any of this but the 4 were:
4 openly racist teachers in a liberal community would already be a lot. But what you describe here sounds more like imbecility, bad humor. It’s incredible how we live in completely different worlds. At least I’ve learned something today.
If a responsible adult from their community witnessed their reactions, she would probably talk to them about it after, just to make sure they were okay.
I think they’ll be just fine without it.
There’s always a few easily scared kids in every class
Sure, in special needs schools.
Afro, you’re dramatically underestimating how fearful folks are.
In 1998, 8% of U.S. adults claimed to be afraid of the dark, 17% afraid of thunder and lightening, and 34% afraid of spiders and insects. If grown men and women were that fearful in 1998, imagine six-year-olds in the 1980s.
Sorry that I don’t live surrounded with morons.
To be honest I am traumatized reading afros comments in the comment section and Id like someone to explain to me why hes here.
I went on a binge on these first contact videos after watching that one Pumpkin posted.
Very interesting.
PP, snakes top the list of most feared things? Surely this is an adaptation (and thusly explainable by evolutionary psychology) and tells us that we had to have fear of snakes in the EEA to better survive.
Snakes are the only animal i truly fear. As a kid i came up with the theory that we evolved to fear snakes over millions of years in the open african savanahs. Only later did i learn that was a real theory.
Might be a just-so-story but it’s a pretty logical one
I legit have no fear of snakes at all, just completely indifferent to them as if the snake is a chair or something.
I have very bad involuntary trypophobia though, I can’t look at these pictures. I involuntarily feel dizzy, disgusted and very sick, though with practice I can control this reflex. Interestingly, I noticed Asians seem to be completely unaffected by this.
peepee just made that up.
the only reason to be afraid of snakes is if they’re venomous.
in my part of the country there are no such snakes. so i have always been “charmed” by them. i like to think i live in The Wind in the Willows.
my yard has or has had deer, raccoons, coyotes, opossums, moles and voles, rats, mice, ants, and of course squirrels and birds.
lesbian shitholers must be deported or gassed.
On this view, at least some human fears (but not all) are given explanations in evolutionary terms. So a fear of snakes or spiders, like our fear of strangers and heights, serves to protect us from dangers. Having observed that snakes and spiders are always scary, and not only to humans, but other primates, Steven Pinker (1997: 386) says “The common thread is obvious. These are the situations that put our evolutionary ancestors in danger. Spiders and snakes are often venomous, especially in Africa…. Fear is the emotion that motivated our ancestors to cope with the dangers they were likely to face (cf. Nesse 1990). This is a curious view, actually. Spiders offer very little risk to humans, aside from annoyance. Most are not even venomous. There are perhaps eight species of black widow, one of the Sydney funnel web, six cases of brown recluses in North and South America, and one of the red banana spider in Latin America. These do present varying amounts of risk to humans. They are not ancestrally in Africa, our continent of origin. Given that there are over 37,000 known species of spiders, that’s a small percentage. The risk from spiders is exaggerated. The “fact” that they are “always scary” and the explanation of this fact in terms of the threat they posed to our ancestors is nonetheless one piece of lore of evolutionary psychology. Likeways, snakes have a reputation among evolutionary psychologists that is hardly deserved. In Africa, some are truly dangerous, but by no means most. About one quarter of species in Uganda pose a threat to humans, though there is geographic variability. It’s only in Australia—hardly our point of origin—that the majority of snakes are venomous. Any case for an evolved fear of snakes would need to be based on the threat from a minority. In this case too, the threat seems exaggerated. There is a good deal of mythology in the anecdotes we are offered. It is not altogether clear how the mythology gets established, but it is often repeated, with scant evidence.
https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/evolutionary-psychology-maladapted-psychology
Single best predictor of intelligence: performance in college mathematics coursework. Perhaps a better predictor than IQ for many complex jobs.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4557354/
Just because you want 😉
As expected the quality of intellect is never understood or even a matter of curiosity by ALMOST of hbdears, why**
exactly because their quantitative biass
See what I wrote below the music.
I wrote it on an unrelated forum.
I made a thread on how I was pretty much a wallflower in high school and did not know how to take care of myself socially (why I had the breakdown after graduation). Some kids just know how to put themselves out there and go get what they want but not me. It is the reason I have no friends. I am not saying I have no social intelligence but I am saying I lack cognitive empathy which is the ability to predict what others will do. I have intuitive empathy which means I can tell unconsciously the kind of person you are. And what your personality is. (unrelated to MBTI) But not much I can do with this feeling I get from the other person because it is not based on actions but core being. Social intelligence I would say is seeing behaviors and predicting the way a person is from that and plenty of kids do this way better than I do it. And that is why I fail at social stuff because I usually detect in their personality that we are not compatible. I do not just engage with people. A socially intelligent person will love talking and being friends with anyone because they base everything on learning behaviors. I am a wallflower and I can only be around a certain group of types of persons and I am not actively looking for people to interact with. So like I said people that go for it and get what they want in life are active socially and they seem to be smarter as kids or adults. I see them on youtube a lot. They are go-getters.
For PP blog members
With more clarification when I say I can understand personality it is a feeling tone that resonates with my personal value set. So it is more of an agreeableness detection which means that if we have strong views we cannot become angry people disagree with us. Reactivity is the word, I look for low reactivity. And also since cooperation is good so trust is high more can be said more can be expressed. The look in the eyes is non-judgmental. It is reading emotions of people on how far you can go with them. It is my trust meter. I see someone roll their eyes I know what I said can no longer be said. You can do this with active engagement I just know the first time what will happen from body language and voice tone. Emotions let me know trust. An active person will build up experienced interactions with people as a panorama of what they are like. Like I said they are predicting them. I just know their emotional state and decide how to interact with them nothing to do with knowing what they will do but the right way to engage them. I need to find out how far they are trustable because I am very lonely.
”I am not saying I have no social intelligence but I am saying I lack cognitive empathy which is the ability to predict what others will do.”
Are you confortable alone in your home doing your things**
I’m. I think most of my historical of non-social life it’s due because my lack of interest to engage with another people, specially because i always was hyper-imaginative.
Right now i have the necessity to have friends and i have good ones. I hope you can find someone. Again, creates a profile in wrong planet to start.
I’m you.
peepee might be like the indian guy in this vid.
or at least that’s what my afghani cab driver told me last night.
They should do a detective show with RR as a private eye. It would be hilarious. RR could ‘investigate’ crimes by accusing the victims parents of doing it to stop global warming or asking people at the bus stop whether they killed anyone. I would pay to watch that.
In my opinion, as bad as RR is, certain commenter is even worse because certain commenter knows the truth but is in complete denial and is a total hack with any evidence. To make the analogy complete, whereas RR would ask whether he was in the same reality as someone who got shot, certain commenter would say the person attacked the guy with the shotgun and nearly scared him to death.
“this crime is not reducible to the physical”
“the laws of crime does not follow any syllogism”
“your metric is not construct valid”
“all of this is reductionistic”
“your´e only providing ad hoc reasoning”
“refute my valid argument”
Ive been unemployed for 8 months now. Im hoping i can recover to a point i can even do a government job or something. Im not what i used to be. I sleep a lot. And the drugs are definitely making me dumber but more serene. Im perfectly happy on unemployment playing video games and reading and watching good tv and hanging out now and again. I would have been happy to live like this even if i was feeling normal. I never needed much to be happy with things. When i was younger i wanted to see the world and get the top jobs and that. Now some days im in the unemployment centre with people who cant wash themselves properly. I had a stretch where my symptoms eased a lot a few years back. Maybe it will happen again.
Looking at the new york times makes me physiclally ill. I was at a debating event a year ago and the man I was speaking to was a scientist and he said that most of the media was biased except the new york times.
I couldn’t believe how retarded he was. I wanted to say it was the MOST neoconservative/zionist/jim jones newspaper.
If you are a liberal and reading the NYT, does it ever occur to you the NYT promotes war all the time instead of a liberal foreign policy? Lol.
Of course, neocons keep saying intervening to save baby pandas from chem weapons in Syria is a left wing reason lol. People who read that paper are so fucking dumb on moral ethics they think bombing the shit out of a country is saving the country from ‘madmen’.
This is why I say liberals are in many ways even dumber than the most doe eyed mormon conservative. You could never convince a mormon to burn a cross, but you can always reliably convince a liberal to bomb the shit out of a muslim.
Lyrion, does that make me a secret berber for saying that?
No, actually I don’t see anything wrong in what you just said.
When pumpkin says liberals are “smarter” than conservatives he means, the media portrays liberals as “smarter” than conservatives. There hasn’t been a smart liberal thinker in the past 50 years outside of chomsky and I suppose David Harvey, but he would be a traditional marxist.
I think pumpkin should have said marxists are smarter than conservatives. That I would believe. I never met someone that understood marx that I thought I could convince up was down by invoking panda bear imagery.
Marx himself wrote a bit about HBD, but in a passing way. I think he felt pity for the other races of man, while also knowing that they were inherently different. Hitchens talks about Marx’s involvement in the American Civil War. Its the same nuanced opinion that I would have had – i.e. against slavery, but cognisant of what blacks are.
This is something that explodes liberal brains today.
I think Abe Lincoln was the exact same on race issues even though Steven Spielberg pretends he was secretly born in Namibia for his movie.
Conservatives are high in conscientiousness and low in openness.
Liberals are high in openness but low in conscientiousness.
It is a contrast between routine and constant exploration. Nothing to do with intelligence just creatively because if you never try anything new you can never be creative. But certainly, you can be intelligent by crunching all the numbers. High-stress jobs require low neuroticism because if not you break down. I break down all the time. I have high neuroticism. I am extroverted but I get stressed around certain people I can’t relate to. I am agreeable so I am friendly.
Liberals try new stuff, conservative stick to routine. It is not an intelligence difference it is a creativity difference.
”Nothing to do with intelligence”
Less about you and more about the topic, everything to do with intelligence. Personality is just like a virus which alter the perceptive or cognitive capacity.
Indeed, the brightest fake typical socialists are CONS in many aspects. Maybe a praise but also very offensive at moral terms.
you saying conservative cannot be intelligent because they are mostly uncreative orderly regimented people?
conservatives and liberals are equally intelligent. liberals just are mostly more creative.
Kitty,
if you understood this…
conservatives and liberals are equally intelligent.
Same qualitative level: binnary thinking.
Different styles.
They have different evolutive or existential perspectives. Both have their right and wrong points.
Most smarter libs are clever sillies BUT most of smarter cons are clever mothafuckers.
One group is mostly histerical
Another is insensitive ones.
makes sense
Libs are, on avg, emotionally smarter than cons, BUT they are not ideally emotionally smart. Cons are, on avg, cognitively smarter than libs, specially high IQ cons, BUT they are not ideally cognitively smarter. In both or there is a lack of a excess = lack of reason.
Indeed, many points from the extreme left to the extreme right are nearly perfect picture of reality. But because sexual dimorphism also in psychological and cognitive aspects, people has was born ”fractioned”.
Cons have better heuristics than libs because they are more in-natura or less ”culturalists”, even we also have irrelidious cons who are more-culturalists.
All the time we have
facts
and
values
facts are
what it is
values are
what to do with it
MOST people
confuses facts with values = insensitiveness
or
values with facts = distortion of reality.
Most people get their heuristics firstly from themselves
This explain why many homossexuals believe in ”gender theory”
It’s basically self-extrapolation or self-projection.
This conjugation between the individual and reality is always important and fundamental aspect of life, but it’s often is due in imperfect reason specially among humans.
I think pumpkin should have said marxists are smarter than conservatives. That I would believe.
I think we’re just arguing semantics. To me a Marxist is just an extreme economic liberal, and a cultural Marxist is just a social liberal.
People who self-identify as conservative in the U.S. were far more likely to support the Iraq war than self-identified liberals were.
The alt-right are not representative of conservatives. Indeed Richard Spencer denies he’s just an extreme conservative. Indeed on foreign policy the alt-right is more liberal than most Democrats.
I define liberal as supporting the underdogs (the poor, gays, women, blacks, refugees, Hispanics, Native Americans, Muslims, the unhealthy) while conservative I define as supporting the powerful (the rich, the military, Wall street, America, Israel). None of the conventional political categories are conservative or liberal on every issue.
High IQ races and classes tend to be more conservative than low IQ races and classes, but within each race and class, the smarter people tend to be liberal.
”To me a Marxist is just an extreme economic liberal,
and a cultural Marxist is just a social liberal.”
an an an an**
Economic liberal**
If you’re talking about the smartest people ideologically I’d say some of the alt right people are up there with the marxists.
To me the defining things people have to get straight in their minds are:
1. Marx’s class analysis and theories about capitalism are correct.
2. The alt right is 100% correct on HBD and race issues. More bluntly that multiracial societies envisioned by jews are not going to work and never have which is why we created nation states in the first place.
3. The alt right is also right about the female mind.
4. Harvey is right that neoliberalism is a parasitical scam in academia that ignores empirics because its bullshit.
5. The Jew Question – mainly how do you handle a group of very tribal people who are high in IQ and psychopathic personalities.
You have to know about these things. If you don’t know about these things, the policies you make will make people worse off and lead to violence, poverty, predation and general societal illness.
Plato said the philosophers should rule over the warriors and merchants because the philosophers would be people who had experienced war and commerce themselves.
The more I think about it, these 3 archetypes are your bread and butter in civilised nations/empires.
Right now, our (((merchant))) class is supreme.
I would tend to put priests and religious figures in with ‘philosophers’ or ‘learned people’ as historically they were the same thing.
And so we can say:
The degenerate warrior is a tyrant.
The degenerate philosopher creates dogma.
And the degenerate merchant creates open borders.
Right now the middle east is somewhat ruled by ‘philosophers’ – the clerics and that but this is not optimal.
I would suggest Israel is also ruled by philosophers, not merchants. Its clear that Israel is being run according to a vision, not a looting operation like Western nations. And so, Fenoopy charmingly provides a way to think of Israel’s philosophers – the Globalist Soros types and the Adelson tribal neocon types.
In comparison to merchants, even the most dogmatic philosophers don’t destroy their people that badly. Maybe Plato is right but in an ironic twist, hes right because priests are the least bad of a millitary dictatorship, theocracy, and globalist slaughterhouse.
You aren’t thinking about this precisely. You are always right [in my opinion] in regards to general direction, aka you are good at sensing, but once you delve into details like this I have a lot of disagreements with you.
You tend to love vague terms, us and them terms, bogeyman terms, not specific names of people and organizations and states.
Dogma: The term dogma is used in pejorative and non-pejorative senses. “Dogma” is transliterated in the 17th century from Latin (Latin: dogma) meaning “philosophical tenet”, derived from the Greek dogma (Greek: δόγμα) meaning literally “that which one thinks is true” and dokein (Greek: dokeo) “to seem good”.[1][2] In the non-pejorative sense, dogma is an official system of principles or tenets of a church, such as Roman Catholicism,[3] or the positions of a philosopher or of a philosophical school such as Stoicism.
In the pejorative sense, dogma refers to enforced decisions, such as those of aggressive political interests or authorities.[4][5] More generally, it is applied to some strong belief that the ones adhering to it are not willing to rationally discuss. This attitude is named as a dogmatic one, or as dogmatism; and is often used to refer to matters related to religion, but is not limited to theistic attitudes alone and is often used with respect to political or philosophical dogmas.
Pill is a hidden post modernist
he believe is not dogmatic, what a …
I don’t think neither Plato or pill would be a good governant..
I keep seeing jewish mass media saying we should teach kids about “critical thinking” and not to be fooled by ‘fake news’. I couldn’t stop laughing.
The first lesson I would teach about critical thinking is to google the person who wrote what you read and figure out if hes jewish.
cory booker is 48, 6’4″, a vegetarian and never married black man.
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/382876-dem-senator-grills-pompeo-on-views-about-muslims-homosexuality
maybe cory booker will have sex with me.
Yeah he’s a homo
the average indian man makes liberace look like john wayne.
sad!
”cory booker is 48, 6’4″, a vegetarian and never married black man.”
”Yeah he’s a homo”
Useless or confirmatory comment
maybe cory booker and raphael bostic are what happens when a black man has a small penis.
because when a black man has a black sized penis he simply says, “muh dick!” whenever he can’t understand something and thus remains ignunt.
indian women smell like goats.
sad!
Just recently moved into a new apartment. Both roommates are Indian (one’s a pharmacist, the other’s in med school). Thank God they don’t smell like curry.
Hey all,
How do you feel about most Indian people you meet in your everyday life? Are there specific things that are most memorable about them? How would you classify their intelligence and looks? Why do you think there is stigma surrounding Indians in America while popular culture has come to accept east and southeast Asians to a much greater degree? I remember when I was around 7, there were significantly fewer asian actors in movies and commericals than there are now; however, the prevalence of Indians in such media has not changed much, other than the few exceptional actors and actresses such as Pryanka Chopra and Aziz Ansari. I just want to know what it is about Indians that throws so many off.
I completely agree that Indians have become more prevalent in media, but I’m wondering why it is that east asians are more accepted in the media and in everyday life.
Can we limit the discussion to Indians in America and Canada?
”Can we limit the discussion to Indians in America and Canada?”
Brazil simply no have indian immigrants or descents at all.
I often no have a bad stereotypes at all about them, of course, on avg.
Short, brown, submissive, ugly, few words that come to mind.
I especially don’t like them for being spineless and sucking up to Whites despite colonialism.
People without a backbone. Bred to be servile.
To quote Jimmy/Fenoopy “they (Indians) ruin everything”
This is not a people you want to respect. Vicious and not so smart like MENA and submissive like East Asians.
Indians are very loquacious. That’s a positive trait to most people.
hbbs loves illiterate ”eugenics”…
from ”james trumpson”
Liberals seek novelty so they think they are smart for all the originality of their ideas and the number of ideas they tried.
Conservatives find ideas that work and so canonize, establish, lay foundations and standards for rules of doing things.
One is more experimental and the other formalized.
One is more try thing out the other is get things done, stick with what works.
That is pretty much it.
Mugabe is right about Psychiatry almost. Because it still does establish empirical verification of real mental conditions. But fails at identifying other real conditions. They have no idea what is causing the tangled stuck twisting feeling in my head that burns. I want to try neurofeedback, I saw a commercial and wrote down a number. But what I am doing now is using pure willpower to not resist my brains reorganizing itself.
Concerning A.I.
The wires in the brain are organized for intelligence.
Simulated wires should be able to self-organize the same.
Feedback should allow perception and action rewiring.
”Liberals seek novelty so they think they are smart for all the originality of their ideas and the number of ideas they tried.”
They don’t necessarily seek for novelty.
Novelty in this reality means ”non-conservative”
Everything which is not conservative is a novel*
Not necessarily.
Seems majority of them are binnary thunkers as conservatives but in opposite sides. I don’t know if they like originality per si but anything which can be anti or non conserv as possible.
Indeed, when we are talking about liberal intellectuals we are not talking about avg lib.
avg lib as we can see tends to repeat ideas or arguments made by (((leftist intellectual mafia))), well, cons too, about their own intellectual elitz.
”Conservatives find ideas that work and so canonize, establish, lay foundations and standards for rules of doing things.”
Liberals, on avg, are doing the same thing, can’t you see it**
It’s inevitable, ideas are the mean for conclusive ends, and not something perpetual in the air.
”One is more experimental and the other formalized.
One is more try thing out the other is get things done, stick with what works.”
It’s what psychological today want you to believe.
”Mugabe is right about Psychiatry almost.”
The few concrete or continuous stuff he already said here about this i don’t think so.. much.
There are real conditions but even in this real ones there are some truth about how insane ”normal” people can be based on these excentric perspectives, for example, autism social phobia or social deficit. Even there is something autism spectrum, also the levels of subjectivity in neurotypical social life is so high that to be alone; avoid most people; have hard time to understand another minds are not so wrong at all [i’m repeating ”at all”, period].
https://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21620204-size-and-homogeneity-countrys-population-has-big-bearing-its-economic
“French National” Drugged and Raped a British Woman in Thailand”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mbZI-FawHA
If this is how Algerians behave in France they are really sons of dogs. If someone did that to my sister I would kill him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wl9y3SIPt7o
These kind of religious animals that believe they’re an authority are disgusting. ‘Judge’ my ass.
Don’t you yourself beat your sister ?
Yes, with punches and kicks, not a belt. It wasn’t one sided either, they were fights that she would start, I was the peaceful one in the family. Today in the modern day my sister is a black belt TKD instructor. That’s just always been her personality. My sister is also retarded, aggressive and religious. She basically has Afrosapiens level IQ and aggression.
Would you mind if you find your sister in Afro’s bed?
https://mobile.twitter.com/SteveStuWill/status/984189409745559552
Excessive male intra group competition**
what afro claims for madagascar would be very interesting if true.
it appears the people are so mixed that there is a continuum from black african to dark malay (like people from indonesia).
is it really true that there is no division economic and/or political between the “pure” malays and everyone else? or the “pure” blacks and everyone else?
and madagascar also has some whites and indians, right?
bourdain visited madagascar and dined in the house of one its old rich. i think the woman was indian or mulatto. idr.
list of madagascar’s richest: https://www.quecie.com/richest-people-in-madagascar/
list of madagascar’s presidents: https://www.google.com/search?ei=kh7RWuHoL6qA0wK68aGABA&q=presidents+of+madagascar&oq=presidents+of+madagascar&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0j0i5i30k1l2.9853.9853.0.10116.1.1.0.0.0.0.65.65.1.1.0….0…1.1.64.psy-ab..0.1.64….0.SEwm_5PggQQ
PP, one of my comment is stuck in moderation, you should check it. If you did it on purpose please explain why.
just seemed a bit inappropriate. I moderate dozens of comments a day, so I have to make snap judgements about what to publish and what to moderate.
Why don’t you make clear rules so we don’t waste time writing comments that won’t be published ?
I should
https://youtu.be/Bahdy4Fqtd4?t=1m56s
Poor Santo. I don’t know why Asian girls love Caucasians so much.
that’s not hard.
people will say blah blah blah
but the bottom line is
in general
black women and chinese men are the least attractive.
“a) 9th grade gay math teacher who mocked the black community by calling his fellow whites “brother”.”
OMG that’s fucking AMAZING, what a fucking legend, what a savage, moment of silence in respect for this animal