Over the years I’ve made many attempts to estimate the IQs of my readers. Let’s take a look down memory lane:
Gestalt test (Estimated mean self-reported IQ 127 )(U.S. norms)
Based on self-reported performance on a Gestalt test, I estimated my readers have a mean IQ of 123 with an SD of 16 or 19.5 (depending on how Gestalt IQ is calculated). But as a commenter noted, the Gestalt test was normed in Ontario which has a mean IQ of 106 (U.S. norms) and Canada as whole has an SD only 89% as large as America’s (Ontario’s SD is not known).
On a scale where the American mean is set at 100 with an SD of 15, Ontarians are likely 106 with an SD of say,13.4. Using the same U.S. norms, my readers would thus average IQ 127 (SD 14 to 17)
Professionally tested (Mean self-reported IQ 129)(U.S. norms)
Back in May 2017 I befriely ran a comprehensive poll of my readers which included the question What was your most recent score on an official professionally administered individual IQ test taken in the last 10 years? An astonishing 59% claimed they were professionally tested, and their self-reported scores had a mean of 129 with an SD of 21 (U.S. norms). Of course self-reported polls (even anonymous ones) can’t always be taken at face value. There is self-selection in who answers which questions. There are trolls self-reporting IQs as low as 40 or as high as 160+. In addition some of the tests might have been used outdated or non-American norms. Nonetheless, a beautiful bell-like curve emerged:

The SAT (Mean self-reported score equated to IQ 132)(U.S. norms)
Perhaps the single best data-set was from 2015 when I asked readers to select their SAT scores (verbal + math) along with whether they had taken the test before of after the April 1995 re-centering. When converted to IQ equivalents (U.S. norms) readers averaged 132 with an SD of 20. Since 91% of American readers who were old enough to have taken the SAT/ACT had actually done so, those who took the SAT seem representative of American readers as a whole and it’s unlikely that the distribution would change much if the 9% who had not taken it could be forced to do so.

Although the distribution does not form as bell-shaped a curve as the previous graph, there is little evidence of trolling. Till this day no one has ever claimed a perfect score on the pre-recentered SAT. Perhaps this is because the primary troll is “Mug of Pee” and he restrained himself from trolling this one poll out of reverence for the SAT which he considers the best IQ test.
Summary
Gestalt test: Mean IQ 127 SD 14 to 17
Professional IQ test: Mean 129 SD 21
SAT IQ equivalent: Mean 132 SD 20
Average of all three: Mean IQ 129 SD 19
Jonathan Wai method
Professor Jonathan Wai has argued that you can estimate how many top 1% minds are in a group by counting how many elite school alums are in that group. The elite school alums and the top 1% minds will not necessarily be the same people, but the frequency of one arguably predicts the frequency of the other. Assuming the group does not actively select for elite alums, this approach might work.
In 2015, a poll of my readers found that of the 61 respondents who were both American and old enough to be alums, an astonishing 62% claimed to be elite alums implying 62%of my readers have IQs of 135+ (U.S. norms).

I find that hard to believe, but it’s one more piece of evidence pointing to the mean IQ of my readers being somewhere around the +2 SD mark.
Pumpkin, would you take a look at this?
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eX0VOG05v0hek9_UejoKX7RRTprdCOf6ANgsfiWSEqI/edit
Its a guy who created a way to try and emulate WAIS-4 results with internet tests. For instance, VCI is calculated via a composite of one to three untimed tests of crystalized G the main of which purports a .9 correlation to WAIS VCI(CCAT/JCCES; c-09 and IAW are the optional tests). PRI’s substitute is one to two tests, the main of which correlates at .77 with WAIS-3 PIQ and .85 to the matrix reasoning subtest.
WMI and PSI are measured by actual WAIS tests adapted to digital form for research purposes. Its Digit Spam + Number-Letter-Sequencing but missing arithmetic for WMI, and Symbol Search + coding for PSI. The norms are the actual WAIS’s and you have to record your screen to score yourself later, since the research doesnt provide you with results.
And than you have a table for FSIQ and GAI based on the transformed scores.
Would you mind taking a look at that? Does it seem sound to you methodologically? Thaks PP
I don’t have time to vet all this.
White women are pathetic.
WTF you allow him to insult whites but you ban racist against jews and blacks???
Youre fucking retarded Pill. Go back under your rock please.
peepee and her husband.
There is a positive correlation between liking the Oprah tv show and scoring low on IQ tests.
There’s a negative correlation between theism & IQ yet Chris Langan is a genius. I’m the Chris Langan of Oprah fans in that I like her based on scientific theory just as Langan believes in God based on philosophical theory.
Langan is not a genius because of his high score or his “philosophical theory” about god. You are a fan of Oprah Winfrey by irrational reasons in the same way Langan uses his cognitive skills to reinforce personal desires, expectations and beliefs and not to look for what is true. Newton was not recognized as a genius by his irrational beliefs but for what he produced and which is based on logical reasoning. You are skillfully rationalizing your fanaticism but still wrong.
There’s absolutely no evidence to suggest Chris langan is a genius. In fact I bet he’s a moron. All Trump supporters (who aren’t directly profiting off of him) are.
His IQ is freakishly high—the psych dude who tested him was interviewed in Langan’s TV profile—but I think his social IQ is pretty mediocre. That’s why he buys into the 4-D chess narrative.
Maybe there’s something to Kitty’s theory about high intelligence.
are you sure he buys the 4d chess narrative? I give him more credit than that.
Langan is neither rational nor innovative. You do not understand that the size of the IQ does not matter if you are not able to use it intelligently. IQ is a shallow and at the same time accurate indicator of intelligence because it predicts the quantitative potential that the individual can reach but not how he will use this powerhouse. In relation to human intelligence, the ability to search only for truths without being guided by biases is fundamental. This is what differentiates a talented astronomer from a talent astrologer. IQ is similar to analyzing a person’s level of extraversion and concluding that if he is very extroverted, his social intelligence will be significant. There is a correlation between the two, but it does not mean that every super extrovert have a talent to navigate the human social world.
not the psychotic q-anon version, but he thought the stuff trump did during his first 2 years was part of some larger strategy to keep his campaign promises.
he wrote about this a bunch of times on his old quora account.
1. God is NOT the loch ness monster or yeti. he’s more like d b cooper.
2. when you turn off your playstation, x-box, whatever you don’t die.
3. “what is empirically verifiable is all i should believe in” is an unemperical/metaphysical principle.
theodicy is NOT a hopeless endeavor.
4. michael shermer and sam harris are true to type. the mean, rude, angry, autistic atheist. shermer only got married in his 60s. dawkins has been divorced 3 times. atheists are INSUFFERABLE BORES.
Someone (Diana Fleischmann) said that human beings evolved to manipulate each other. Evolved TO … It is the same as saying “human beings evolved to be erect” or “birds evolved to fly”. because or if we practice such an act and that it is not inherently bad, we do it as a means to a generalist or universal end, that human beings have, in fact, evolved, to use their intelligence to survive, including this act of manipulating information if only by the act itself or with second and third intentions.
There are two processes at work.
1. go with the first thing, fix errors later.
2. fix errors first, only think fast when you are certain.
A person who lives in the moment is superfast because they learn fast because they are un-cautious. they get right in there and do stuff fast. They do not worry about mistakes scrutinization or expectation.
A person who is cautious has internal processes working. The cogs turn so to speak.
Introversion and extraversion
Everyone has selective laziness. The person who is extraverted will believe whatever is the fastest course. they test by doing. The introverted person will build and manipulate a belief system. They test by construction.
The difference really is the direction of approach. Back to front brain or Front to back brain.
I pretty much agree with phil and mugabe. The best take on trump is that he’s someone with great political instincts, but gets easily mislead by his close friends and advisors. Probably because relatively low IQ and inability to see the big picture.
I can easily imagine his jewish friends who visit him at mar-a-lago saying something like “hey donnie, great work with the tax cuts, but could ya lay off the immigration talk? you’re doin great.”
In that book Fire and Fury it says he spends time calling other billionaires and asking for their advice on what to do. Apparently Murdoch is consulted alot as is Sheldon Adelson because hes a huge donor.
Sheldon Adelson, explains why contra-pill, trump is the most pro-Israel president in American history. Pill is so dumb politically
Trump’s only instinct is parasitic. This is called brainwashing. Do you think that people can only be brainwashed by leftists ?? You are mistaken. In terms of true political quality, which would equate to a great administrator and / or leader, Trump is worse than the average politician. Just because half of Americans are severely stupid, it does not mean that he is a great leader, perhaps for the Qanon crowd, as well as the leader of a religious cult. But a great statesman is not measured by his popularity but by his actions.
This is pretty much the point I was trying to make. Trump is easily swayed by appeals to his ego.
His 2016 campaign was mostly genuine though.
Brainwashing consists precisely in inducing the uncontrolled emotional OR instinctive tendencies that are different between liberals and conservatives.
Seyyed Hossein Nasr is…
a straight up impressive guy…
and therefore iranian = aryan-ian like the two iranian fields medal winners.
Reflective thinking is an internal process. It is the cognitive control of perception. Taking one thing and putting it together with another.
IQ = putting many perceptions together simultaneously.
parallel chunking
Pumpkin, did you find the numerus basic to be accurate?
Creativity is entirely separate from intelligence in many ways. It’s not a dichotomy but it is separated by one’s need to answer questions and one’s need to create questions.
Mug and Anime are very creative.
Non-verbal intelligence is very useful for school in using graphs. You should do a post on this Pumpkin as it gives credence to the way different intelligences can be used academically to succeed.
The biggest problem with progressivism is also one of its greatest virtues, its drive to want to impose the habits and behaviors of IQ people as a social standard. For example, when a leftist teacher insists that students from poor neighborhoods need to develop a love for reading. Interestingly, this is also a way of imposing the cultural standard of the middle class on the working class … Progressivism is designed for a society of a majority of intelligent people and based on an intellectually sophisticated cultural cycle. It is not the dictatorship of the proletariat per si but of the librarian.
Trumps taxes seem to show that either he has a great accountant and hes declaring losses for tax reasons or he really is an idiot and lost hundreds of millions of dollars over 10/15 year period and hes effectively broke.
If its the latter, I think I have to say Trump is a lot dumber than I thought.
My guess is he has lots of money offshore and makes most of his profits through shell entities in the caymans and the like and for tax purposes declares losses in the US. Thats just my guess.
you have to remember the business trump is in. real estate book value is always less than market value because depreciation expense on usually appreciating asset, and depreciation ususally greater than maintenance expense.
So I’ve decided to re-read a Stiglitz book on the financial crisis from 10 years ago to see if the arguments held up. My hazy memory assured me that Obamas team got it mostly right in relation to economic policy but the book makes the argument obama compromised too much with Wall Street (i.e. Robert Rubin et al). Looking back, Dodd-Frank was a good step and it was good to see Larry Summers didn’t get the fed chair role because of his earlier de-regulation push under Clinton. He needed to be punished for pushing bad policy. On the other hand, the bad stuff was that he kept Bernanke for so long even though he was inept, and there was no strings attached to the bailouts. Stiglitz is right that if the General Motors CEO was fired after taking bailout money, so should’ve most of the banks’ CEOs (and their boards).
I have to say though, the strength of ongoing financial regulation has significantly improved. Regulators are a lot more powerful. For example, I have inside info that Corbat at Citi isn’t “retiring”…hes being removed by the regulator for being incompetent as risk management. And if I remember back to my time in London, regulations were kind of like a second corporation tax or insurance policy. The banks were pouring a lot of resources into compliance which showed they were taking it seriously and being punished. The EU also banned bonuses for bankers in certain scenarios. Banks have been fined a lot.
Basically overall the regulations are a lot better. And there has been pushback against the political power of Wall Street. Its interesting to see it because of course, you all know my theory that certain ethnic minorities on Wall Street basically tell the country what to do. Its interesting how they’ve become more circumspect and allowed the unwashed [redacted by pp, sept 28, 2020] to rein them in a little.
removed by the regulator for being incompetent as risk management…
no. regulators have no idea what they’re doing regarding risk management. i don’t now this from experience. i know this from not having autism.
WRONG!
the point is regulations have to be simple and objective. so…
1. if regulators were sophisticated risk managers, they wouldn’t be regulators…much lower pay.
2. regulations can’t be sophisticated so there’s no need for regulators to be sophisticated.
hes being removed by the regulator for being incompetent as risk management
impossible!
what is possible is he’s being removed for flouting the regs, violating them deliberately and then claiming incompetence.
[redacted by pp, sept 30, 2020] i “know from” insurance regulators.
consulting actuaries make bank just by signing off on under-reserving IBNR and reported but not settles or under-funding pensions…and get away with it.
of course insurance is regulated at the state level in the US, but pensions are regulated at federal level.
srious question for pill…
why is UBS so cheap compared to blackrock?
how can UBS be worth less than $40b?
does not compute.
the thing is japanifiaction means banks are a horrible investment, but look at what hannover re has done since the crisis?
so my theory is, buy what you (think you) understand and then hedge. like buy UBS, etc. and then buy puts on a bank index.
UBS’s wiki page is written by UBS of course, but…
if it’s true that UBS is the go to bank for the super rich…
at least one of its clients has a fortune greater than UBS’s market-cap.
A lot of bank stocks in general are unbelievably cheap right now. Many are trading 20-30% or so below their book values.
obviously!
and in terms of AUM vs market cap its price to BLK’s is fair. BLK has twice the AUM and twice the market-cap…
but BLK has a book value of 33b vs UBS’s 55b.
it’s inetersting because buffett and greenblatt say buy cos with yuge profitability. so like japan central railway has a profit margin of 30%. and railroads in general have yuge profit margins. MSFT has a progit margin of 40%. and asset managers are on the list of types of cos with highest profit margin.
Pumpkin, the average on Numerus Basic fit pretty well with the average of this blog, however the standard deviations were whack. Are Ivan’s norms correct?
https://mobile.twitter.com/EPoe187/status/1310561701394370564
“Evolutionary psychologists” have no idea what happens in the developing world or they are sociopaths who don’t care. The number of stupid whites is really impressive.
what’s the average Verbal score and performance score of someone with a sub 95 IQ?
Pumpkin, apparently highly educated hispanics have no discrepancy between VCI and PRI, however, the average population of the highly educated has a 3.5 point discrepancy between VCI and PRI. The VCI PRI discrepancy between the average hispanic is about 3 points. How much of this would be due to education vs bilingualism? Education makes sense, however there is still a discrepancy between the highly educated.
Biden won but Trump got some really good blows in. Contrary to the media, I think Trumps style is very effective.
Blacks who hate each other want to be white. I bet that if there was an extremely effective way to change the individual’s race, some people on this blog would have volunteered for the procedure. And believe that Trump is not Zionist ?? He had all this time to talk about Jews openly or frankly. I bet he is a false opposition. Prominent figures in organized Jewry realized that the Left is no longer important from the moment they began to become aware of systematic atrocities in the “holy land”. Then, they realized the existence of white evangelicals, of the most idiotic groups among whites and who love Israel fanatically. It is very easy to deceive white people, especially men, just say what they want to hear and accuse the other of being a traitor, than say what they should hear. Trump is false opposition for the simple fact that he never said anything serious about organized Jewry or ethnic Jewish Mafia.
call it organized zionism, since they don’t speak for all Jews or even all organized jews.
when did evangelicals start worshipping Israel? the 80s?
It’d be interesting to look into how conservative protestantism go co-opted by zionism.
but this is just a part of the much bigger problem of christianity.
an ersatz diogenes from bethlehem replaces neoplatonism with revelation, philosophy with authority/revelation.
christianity is a moment in the weltgiest which has some features of the final movement…but not all.
what’s missing even from aquinas’s 5 arguments and from all of philosophy afaik is…
what i call the moral argument…and this was supplied by the jews.
socrates made it, but afaik it has never been recognized as such…
when my dad was dying (although i never knew how sick he was) he became obsessed with near death expericnes.
i told him via email he was being immature.
i regeret that.
but here is what socrates said…explaining why (in my cups) i told my dad he was barking up the wrong tree…
Be of good hope in the face of death. Believe in this one truth for certain, that no evil can befall a good man either in life or death, and that his fate is not a matter of indifference to the gods.
sukb people like dawkins and dennet will misunderstand what socrates means by “the gods”.
so it could be said that the whole of christianity is the moral argument.
the ontoligcal and cosmological arguments too are contained in exodus 3:14.
When an alleged “pro white” says: “I am against socialism, communism”. and never talk about (((them))) …
try to avoid the triple bracket thing as it tends to unfairly lump an entire group together as if they were all the same.
Is this Santo’s new name? Wtf?
I thought we got rid of that guy!
it’s funny how people think CH is just london the country.
there was a swiss at UW who like so many came to the US for school because couldn’t pass tests…canada would’ve been even better.
he said, “i was surprised. switzerland is even richer than here.”
i said, “we know whay switzerland is so rich.”
the soviet american jew friend of mine nodded.
swiss guy says, “because we have all the gold.”
in reality…the swiss economy is much much less dependent on finance than the brotish economy and sitzerland is still a manufacturing country…
i know this from ha-joon chang. why do some koreans have the surname “chang”? i would’ve thought that was just a chinese surname. david chang is also a korean.
what economics should be is this book:

Yeah this is a great book. I read it last year. It also says open borders is suicide for the working class.
peepee knows about john frum, right?
that aged relative whose house sold for ca 2m died today.
he regarded economics, and the nobel in economics, as a joke.
he commented on the obesity of dc negroes.
he was an old leftist, a party of the little man democrat, who regarded his own success as due mostly to absurd luck.
he was the one who told stanford to go fuck themselves.
i would also hop on the feb-may 2022 natural gas spread as it’s near its all time peak in terms of % backwardation.
the reason for this is natural gas production has dropped and is expected to drop further due to low prices today.
low prices today mean high prices tomorrow.
it’s a predator/prey and boom/bust thing…
and it always has been in oil & gas.
barnie frank of frank-dodd and guiliani of the “trial of the dons” are board members of SBNY. it’s been described as trump’s bank. its financial statements show it’s extremely efficient…like the MOST efficient publicly traded bank.
yet its stock keeps falling…i mean it’s fallen by about the same as the bank index ytd…but shouldn’t it’ve fallen less?
and before 2020 its price fell by so much…
its current p/b is 0.93.
is it a mafia bank like PKBK might be?
last night trump alluded to the phili mob.
i’ve bought both. but not much.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signature_Bank
btw, it’s not arcana…
“bank efficiency” is like a mutual fund’s “expense ratio”…
if you view banks as (closed-end) mutual funds…
and all the studies show that the market is effeicient ENOUGH that…
mutual fund performance is mostly explained by how much the guys/gals managing your money charge.
that is, the less they charge, the more you make…
then you’d buy buy buy SBNY.
She did not expel white supremacists. She kicked out ONE white skinhead for insisting on fist-fighting a black skinhead. All the other white skinheads decided to leave with him
no. she ended the interview after one of them called her a monkey. i don’t know what she did with the rest of the time. did it used to be live?
no security ended it long after she was called a monkey. And he didn’t call her a monkey spontaneously, she asked him if she was a monkey and then wanted to know his reasoning. When he tried to change the subject, she brilliantly replied with the double entendre “No I want to talk about the MONKEY BUSINESS!”
Here’s the show
and here’s part 2.
It’d have been interesting to see Oprah talk to someone intelligent like Jared Taylor rather than some indigent skinhead retard.
She’d have done a better job than Donahue, who turned the convo into a bloodsports pissing match.
jared taylor is a moron and probably a CIA op.
btw, it’s not arcana…
“bank efficiency” is like a mutual fund’s “expense ratio”…
if you view banks as (closed-end) mutual funds…
and all the studies show that the market is effeicient ENOUGH that…
mutual fund performance is mostly explained by how much the guys/gals managing your money charge.
that is, the less they charge, the more you make…
then you’d buy buy buy SBNY.
for conspiracy theorists…
how rich is the roman church?
in terms of il-liquid “real” wealth i expect it is the richest organization on earth…and it’s not even close…
but maybe not…maybe it will be done in by lawsuits for chi-mo-ing.
$90m seems like WAY more than spotify will EVER make from JRE.
but rogan is so dumb…
that’s the point!
too smart and too moral and you can’t be midget rogan.
the jealousy, the envy?
sort of…
except rogan is till only 5’0″ tall.
you did Fear Factor you mother fucker!
serious question…
saw ridge at dog park today same color as my irish setter…
and my setter has ridge on his neck…
is the dog bred to kill lions from…
1. southern rhodesia
OR
2. northern rhodesia
???
for peepee: “ridge” refers to “rhodesian ridgeback” and because “ridge” of fur growing opposite other fur along spine.
i said…
“same color. and a ridge. your dog kills lions. my dog kill dinosaurs.”
i would like to enter my theory of why the dinosaurs went extinct…
the were killed by irish setters.
for you. he showed me kindness at a difficult point in my life.
the ultimate loser…his religion uses a mechanism of execution as its symbol…
this is the POINT!
it SMASHES the 613.
and makes all the world’s peoples chosen.
After I forgave someone I saw a vision.
This is not the image but close enough.
Oops..
Load about his parents: “i’m very proud of them!!”
Load’s parents about his son: “he was adopted”
just so you know personal attacks are not tolerated here. I’ll let this one slide since you haven’t been around to know this & because this attack is pretty mild by internet standards (although I can’t see the gif).
Santo you can barely speak english let alone write in it despite years of practice. That has to say something about your intelligence.
Puppy I don’t understand why is gay marriage banned in Israel? Answer this question. Don’t moderate it as usual.
Jews are more religious in Israel than they are in America (on average). And unlike American Jews, they’re not a minority and thus no need to form a coalition with other minorities (i.e. gays, blacks).
“And unlike American Jews, they’re not a minority”
Correct answer.
also, as a paranoid minority, they reflexively side with the so-called disenfranchised against the homogenous goyim.
Jews are strongly liberal in whichever country they’re not predominant, which is a measure to safeguard their strongly conservative core – their chosenitis.
I’m always fascinated by people that live to be near 100 years old or more. Assuming they keep their mental faculties, the amount of experience and time you would see surely makes you a lot closer to the ‘right’ answer in terms of your policy preferences. When people say left wingers are too young to understand, I think they’re right. Wisdom usually comes from age. But it can also come from philosophy or being well travelled and such.
Basically I think theres a case to make that older people and much older people should have their vote weigh more. But I understand this would basically be anti-progressive because very old people tend to be a lot wealthier which would also influence their policy preferences.
Basically a 100 year old poor non-religious, non senile person has a better chance of having better policy preferences than say, someone in their 20s who reads the NYT/Wapo everyday.
Maybe. Politics is about who? whom? more than anything else.
That’s why my 90 year old grandma, who identifies with the right, sides with Fox News on everything even though she should know better.
It’s also why people who say things like “Orwell would be on the right” are probably mistaken.
you know that goebbels’s secretary lived to 106, right? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brunhilde_Pomsel.
yeah. ageism is another example of the “ecological fallacy”. most old people are as LOADED has said “dumb as a barrel of bricks” but not all. in some ways none are as clever as they were in their 20s. but in other ways some of them are as clever as ever.
lawn bowling is the sport where the best are in their 60s.
but maybe this is just because no one plays it anymore.
i think part of senility is just boredom with life in this sublunary realm. sometimes atheletes retire because they can and because their sport has become boring to them.
then there’s the flynn effect.
that is, it could be an old athlete is just as good as he was, but the younger athletes are better than he was.
Pumpkin, what is the Verbal IQ for whites with lower education compared to the performance IQ?
President Donald J. Trump: (01:01:53)
So when I listen to Joe talking about a transition, there has been no transition from when I won. I won that election. And if you look at crooked Hillary Clinton, if you look at all of the different people, there was no transition, because they came after me trying to do a coup. They came after me spying on my campaign. They started from the day I won, and even before I won. From the day I came down the escalator with our first lady, they were a disaster. They were a disgrace to our country, and we’ve caught them. We’ve caught them all. We’ve got it all on tape. We’ve caught them all. And by the way, you gave the idea for the Logan Act against General Flynn. You better take a look at that, because we caught you in a sense, and President Obama was sitting in the office….
In Philadelphia, they went in to watch. They’re called poll watchers, a very safe, very nice thing. They were thrown out. They weren’t allowed to watch. You know why? Because bad things happen in Philadelphia. Bad things. And I am urging my people. I hope it’s going to be a fair election…
phili is very italian.
so the “we’ve caught them on tape” might just be trump bullshit, but what comes next suggests otherwise…
You better take a look at that, because we caught you in a sense, and President Obama was sitting in the office….
is NOT bullshitting.
trump is referring to something he knows but which media has not reported and perhaps does not know.
why am i the only one to notice?
Obama definitely spied on the trump campaign. It may not have been obamas instigation though.
Philo, where are you getting all of this from?
The news Rahul.
talk about a homeless problem…
the dog park i go to is in oregon’s richest municipality (because it’s the closest dog park) and yesterday i saw a guy with a grey beard sleeping in his car. and dude apparently noticed he’d been seen and got in driver’s seat. what kind of shitty country does this to people?
and the so-called “left” is bitching about the 9 unarmed black men killed by police (not the 15 unarmed white men)…
it’s 1984 on acid.
but at least the smoke is gone.
For commenters on here, I take the cake for shittiest city lived in. The current city I live in and have lived in for four years is a complete and desolate shithole with status-strivers and beaners (racial slur for Guats and Brasilians) all around.
I agree that America has an immigrant problem but it mainly comes from Hispanics and mocking East Asians and Indians in America only discredits and devalues the white cause. Hispanics are a real problem though….possibly more black America would be for white Amerikkka.
A few days ago I changed Sailer’s wikipedia description from “white nationalist” to “blogger.”
Within 10 seconds some [redacted by pp, oct 2, 2020] had already changed it back and put a 30-day restriction on my account.
So typical.
“security ended it” immediately after oprah told them to because she’d been called a monkey.
No one was kicked out until a couple segments after the monkey talk & only after physical violence was threatened. She didn’t seem offended by the monkey comment because it was directed at her entire race, & only her by default. It was Oprah who was wanting to discuss it because she knew it was ratings gold.
this video makes it look like she kicks out the guy who called her a monkey and the others followed him. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BRDSvO_eD
it might have been the same guy, but he was only kicked after trying to start a fistfight with another audience member a few segments after the monkey exchange.
Hey pumpkin, can you do an article on the effect of bilingualism on verbal scores?
At some point. If I find the type of research that will clarify the issue
I can’t seem to find any sort of research on it. The only thing I can find that is generally accepted is that vocabularies of Bilinguals are underestimated. Most of the studies looking at verbal scores do say that there is some underestimation though, and in books cultural factors are acknowledged. But the viq discrepancy is only around 5 points for bilinguals, which would mean it wouldn’t be that significant.
What do psychologists around you think about this?
A cursory search leads to many articles on verbal IQ and bilingualism.
is caucasoid orthognathism just an accident or is their an evolutionary explanation?
are europeans more orthognatic than MENAs and south asians?
one explanation is that they have had agriculture longest, and this means their teeth needn’t be so big. the han were not the first farmers of chiner. it was melo’s people, the south chinese. but whereas wisdom teeth are rarely aproblem for negroes, often a problem for caucasoids, many ne asians and central americans simply don’t have wisdom teeth at all.
MENA were the first humans to have agriculture & they had it for thousands of years before whites
so if a white person has wisdom teeth which have come in with no problem, you know he has a large head.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_who_have_walked_on_the_Moon
i doubt any of these guys came out.
all straight white gentile males.
the one group (33% of the US population) which [redacted by pp, oct 3, 2020].
what about K2, Annapurna, nanga parbat?
why is it always white guys?