HBO has already given us the best TV show of all time (six feet under) and the best documentary of all time (Leaving Neverland) and now it strikes again with one of the best teen dramas of all time (Euphoria),.
Teen dramas have really changed a lot since I watched Dawson’s Creek in high school. This is much edgier, much more diverse, and much darker. Unlike the lilly white wholesome Dawson of my generation, the main character on this show Rue, is like a female Melo (see the comment section), a mixed race bad-ass who has sex with whites, dances to rap, and is not afraid to play hardball. She looks like she may have been cast by the show’s executive producer Drake.
Rue’s white drug dealer is very protective of Rue and thinks of her as his baby sister. So when the tall popular white jock blackmails Rue’s best friend, the drug dealer is having none of it. Even though the jock laughs in the drug dealer’s face and calls him “half-a-retard”, you can tell he’s spooked.
We’re so used to seeing the tall popular jock get his way by beating and blackmailing others, that to see this “half-a-retard” threaten him had me cheering from the couch.
Obviously dialogue on these shows is not meant to be over-analyzed or taken too literally, but what exactly is “half-a-retard”? I interpret it as someone who is roughly half way between average (IQ 100) and “retarded” (IQ below 70) intelligence, or someone who would score below 70 on only half the Wechsler scale (i.e. either the verbal half or the non-verbal half, but not both).
You might say the drug-dealer’s IQ is impaired by drugs and not genetically low, but because those with low genetic ability are more likely to end up on drugs, they serve to exaggerate cognitive inequality, while maintaining the genetic rank order. IQ after all is not an absolute score, but a ranking of where one stands compared to others of his generation and as we become adults, the absolute difference between ranks widens while inter-rank mobility remains limited.
Pumpkin Person 
Even though I never watched a complete series of episodes of Dawson’s Creek, I found it enjoyable; as enjoyable as watching 7th Heaven. Early 2000s shows had their charm and appeal that I actually miss. Nowadays, I can’t bear to watch TV. Actually, TV shows are pretty fucking degenerate now.
Theres very little i watch on TV other than sports. Netflix, on the other hand….a mixed bag of mind-boggling genius shows, some good shows, some boring stuff, and some absolute dreck.
Pumpkin, would most bilinguals know all of the words presented in the similarities subtest? Or would the underestimation be due to lower expression abilities and verbal fluency?
“Obviously dialogue on these shows is not meant to be over-analyzed or taken too literally”
Says the guy who has “estimated” IQs of fictional characters.
as rr has alluded/referred to…
another yuge problem with IQ is what george ellis terms…
top-down causation.
It’s not a problem at all.
as churchill and pitt the younger and george iii were to alcoholism, the human species in general is to top-down causation…master champions.
the stock market is having a yuge emotional/womanly outburst today.
the stock market bitches, politicians respond.
who’s the bitch?
answer: both!
i have no red hair and never have had any.
my brother has some red beard hair. my grandfather had some red.
so, unlike peepee, i’m not a black supremacist.
My hair was strawberry blond for the first few years of life. I was the most beautiful baby folks had ever seen. Iāve been told that my whole life by many relatives & family friends
I have red hair in my bead. Some of my black head hair also has a red tint to it. My mother is a ginger
I was blonde as a babe but my hair got darker as I aged. My hair is light brown now. My beard is multi-colored, light brown with some red and since it’s light brown it looks blonde (not blonde blonde, but in the light it looks blondeish).
I get asked if I’m Irish sometimes because of my beard and it triggers me. Then I tell them to look at my mane (long and curly) and ask if they’ve ever seen an Irishman like that.
I usually think ancestry tests are boring but for people like rr it sounds interesting. Have you done one RR? You sound like a Visigothic descendant.
Hunnic of vandal descendant seems more realistic.
I’m flattered that you think I’m a badass Pumpkin. Im not though. I only fight people when they put their hands on me and I’ve never lost. I’ve whooped people bigger than Afro and RR. I once choked out a dude who was a champion in cage fighting. He won tough man competitions. He thought I was fuckng his girl (which I was š ) So maybe I am a little bit, but I definitely don’t go looking for drama. I hate drama.
I’m not even that big. I’m average height (5 10) and I weigh 170 ~10 percent body fat. I’ve had my fair share of whoopings back in my hayday, and some people have gotten me good too.
Has everyone in PP’s blog been in a fight? PP, how many fights have you been in? I’d guess at least 3 or 4 dozen. (I had a good hot streak when I was younger, half my life ago… Now I feel old. I had a fun time when I was a kid.)
Ya but you’re buff ( i think). and so was he and I think he was around your size, if not bigger.
I doubt many of the people here have been in fights. Most of them act like beta cucks.
I’m buff-ish (for my frame).
“Most of them act like beta cucks.”
Hahaha true.
king melo and rr don’t even know what “cuck” means and that its origin because themselves cucks.
it started in the same place as the triple parentheses. trs has a long list of neologisms.
but a half-filipino is always a cuck.
cuck = cuckservative = republican who favors mass immigration of filipinos, tax cuts for billionaires, wars for israel, etc.
paradigmatic cuckservatives = jeb bush, melo, rr
paradigmatic anti-cuck = campaign trump
^spoken like a true cuck
Pumpkin, can your brain still be a clusterfuck of unconnected shit even if your processing speed and WM is high? My PS and WM are only high when Iām passively doing something though. Whenever I try, my PS and WM just fuck off.
But at the heart of Plessy vs Ferguson is the right to be allowed to seperate oneself from another group vs the ‘right given to all men to be treated equally…..by the law’.
So I was reading about how Jim Crow effected native americans and curiously enough, it was a bit mixed. In some places natives were allowed mingle with whites and in some states, not.
Here is Asians under Jim Crow:
Marriage and family: Anti-miscegenation laws added āMongolianā and āMalayā as races that could not marry whites. Meanwhile the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 made it nearly impossible to bring over wives or brides from China. Most Chinese men remained bachelors, though some married black. After 1910 āPaper Sons and Daughtersā began to arrive from China, through a loophole in the Exclusion Act created by the San Francisco Earthquake of 1906.
Education: In the 1920s their children were kicked out of white schools and forced to go to the immensely inferior coloured schools. Gong Lum of Rosedale, Mississippi took it to the Supreme Court. He lost: in Lum v Rice (1927) the Supreme Court ruled that any jurisdiction could classify a non-white group as ācoloredā as long as āequalā facilities were provided.
At the end of the day, it comes down to your moral feelings. The law can be whatever the majority decides at the end of the day or the people the founded the country. I think the people with most cause for greivance maybe the natives. Many blacks were sold into slavery by other blacks. Owning slaves has been very common in most of human history, not just the US.
So its funny thinking there were 3 seperate bathrooms for coloureds, blacks and whites back in the day.
But if whites wanted to emigrate to China/Japan, I seriously doubt they would have been treated any better in the 1800s and early 19th century. But I could be wrong.
“I think the people with most cause for greivance maybe the natives”
I agree.
“Many blacks were sold into slavery by other blacks. Owning slaves has been very common in most of human history, not just the US.”
I don’t think that makes any of it right at all.
first generation asian immigrants and black african immigrants should be penalized in admissions, hiring, etc. vs those whose ancestors have been americans for 100 years or more. but affirmative action and diversity aren’t about what’s right. they’re about what’s good for the mongolians. now americans, canadians, australians, brits whose great great … grandparents were citizens lose places to recent arrivals, most of whom are the cream of their much more populous societies. harvard should not be 45% asian or whatever. that’s absurd. but the ultimate problem is a multi-ethnic society and that the top 1% in ability of india and chiner is 28 million people compared to 3.25 million americans, 230,000 australians, etc. it’s a problem even if streetshitters are inferior and china people have tiny brains because 2.8 b people. then there are pakis. but filipinos are so dumb there’s no need to worry.
Diversity is good. It’s why I’m more intelligent than you.
I think free healthcare and the regulation of corporations is more important than…whatever it is you advocate. But hey I don’t expect a cuck to understand that.
diversity is bad. it can only be maintained with discrimination/affirmative action and constant propaganda.
and the more diverse a country the more unequal, the more violent, the lower the trust…
the only genuinely harmful legacy which the colonial powers left the developing world was artificial borders and thus diversity. india has more than 800 languages. very bad.
diversity is why the US has become so backward on economic issues compared to other developed countries, why the US has reverted to a developing country in so many places, as stiglitz has pointed out. identity politics doesn’t sell in iceland. that bourgeois trick doesn’t work in a small homogeneous society.
pretty sure melo is not a malay/austronesian but a negrito. they live in northern luzon. this is why he likes rap and brags about the size of his dick. this is why he is a sub-moron. because negrito. manny pacquiao is einstein compared to melo.
a picture of melo:
I’ve never met someone so assbackwards in their thought.
There is no coherency. He is mentally incohesive. He wouldn’t be alive and subsequently have to suffer like this if his momma had just accepted some brown dick instead. Sad.
This is why diversity is good.
Ever wonder why rich people seem the most hysterical on the subject? Ever notice that itās the highest paid people on TV who are the most determined to convince you that white supremacy is Americaās biggest problem? Why is that? Simple: every minute that youāre angry about race is a minute youāre not thinking about class, which of course is the real divide in this country. Working class people of all colors have a lot more in common with each other than they do with some overpaid MSNBC anchor. If you were allowed to think about that for long enough, you might start to get unauthorized ideas about economics.
“But at the heart of Plessy vs Ferguson is the right to be allowed to seperate oneself from another group vs the āright given to all men to be treated equallyā¦..by the law”
It should always be about reducing pain long term. Until we are not human.
“At the end of the day, it comes down to your moral feelings. The law can be whatever the majority decides at the end of the day or the people the founded the country. ”
This comes into what I call the “masterrace paradox”. Namely some superior traits can weaken the tribe or strengthen others without the trait. Empathy is a obvious example. The paradox is that becoming the enemy “leads to the best result” but can’t happen because you become the enemy. The pattern is that people to divergent from the tribe get exterminated, so only evil groups that are slightly worse survive. And then there’s conflict to solve that the slightly more cruel group accumulates resources becuase of the paradox not beholding it. No group is capable of advancing themselves consciously with ideology becuase of the paradox, only big men.
Evil Vs good is quantity vs quality. Good people first need to organise themselves and then defeat the enemy becuase it often comes a little unsuspectingly.
I think that the natives and blacks have a similar central issue, which is that they live in (white) “America”. If both groups could be left with their own culture/media and languages/religions they’d be happier. Slavery did improve their material wealth but that isn’t everything. A lot of non-whites cuck out to whites and it’s pretty cringe and sad and unnescessary. This is where the “big man” view of history becomes real. Only in war time.
“As of 2013, the global market for skin lighteners was projected to reach $19.8 billion by 2018 based on sales growth primarily in Africa, Indian-Asia, and the Middle East. In the United Kingdom, many skin whiteners are illegal due to possible adverse effects. Such products are frequently still sold even after shops have been prosecuted”
Sad!
I also think they are treated badly by the economy for being poor, a serf class and non-white but I guess you disagree with that.
But I think it’s possibly a wider conspiracy when it comes to race relationship in America. They are using blacks and Muslims to scare away whites from their colonies so that they can be given to China. China could then economically blackmail India into being neutral or joining them. From there they’ll rule the world probably through military means in like 15 years. WW3 begins in 2033-9.
One thing I forgot to mention when talking about the logistics in WW3 was that kinetic bombardment would make underground bunkers and mechanised mobile troops the primary weapons. The Mongol horde will be back! Ai 360 view machine guns might also be used. https://youtu.be/3ygFeywrvjc
Some say that Chinese media censorship has to do with the Chinese being the good guys. I would have to read more to get a opinion about that.
Yikes. Thinking mouse sometimes you say smart things other times it’s obvious you just run on pure intuition. You’re not evolved enough to rely on it and still be succesful. No human is.
The Chinese are terrible people. Have you seen what’s happening in Hong Kong? Oh wait, I’ll let you use you intuition first before you observe anything. Hahaha.
It would be interesting reading about how asians treat blacks in china and japan and also historically.
Imagine being so retarded that you think RR and I are conservative.
Congratulations you know what it’s like to be Mugabe.
Imagine being so retarded thinking the mugabe thinks you are a conservative.
Imagine being so retarded that you don’t know how to read.
Congratulations you know what it’s like to be philosopher.
What do you think my political beliefs are?
Aren’t you libertarian or something?
Yes.
I’m for closed borders, no immigrationthough.
Libertarians are not conservative
Mugabe both called us “cuckservative” which he defined as: “republican who favors mass immigration of filipinos, tax cuts for billionaires, wars for israel, etc.”
If that definition doesn’t sound sensical, it’s because it’s not
That’s hilarious because I’m against all immigration, I’m undecided about tax cuts for billionaires (leaning towards heavier taxes for them), and everyone here knows my views on Israel (we shouldn’t be in their business as they attempt to create Greater Israel. We should be completely isolationist).
“Iām against all immigration”
Neither you or I would be here if immigration wasn’t a thing.
“Iām undecided about tax cuts for billionaires (leaning towards heavier taxes for them)”
My nigga!
Also name one fucking republican that you know is 100% for open borders.
“Neither you or I would be here if immigration wasnāt a thing.”
I realize that. I still believe we should have closed borders and not allow any immigrants.
I’ve stated before that the first organism that moved was an immigrant. That “Native” Americans aren’t “native” to America and that they’re migrants too. I then say that the only true “natives” are black Africans. It triggers aut-righters, I think it’s really funny.
What do you think of that logic?
“My nigga!”
Yea. I see the argument that they “deserve it” and why should anyone tax them higher or whatnot. But then again, if they’re hoarding all the money and not letting it “trickle down”, what use is it? (Note that I don’t understand economics.)
What’s your view on this?
“Also name one fucking republican that you know is 100% for open borders.”
I can’t name one. And if one exists he’s probably a turncoat.
I think gays shouldn’t be parading around the street around kids, but I don’t care what people do in their homes (with reason, of course). I don’t think they should marry.
What do you think there?
libertarianism is a form of autism…low IQ autism.
almost all republicans were for open borders until trump fucktard.
“I still believe we should have closed borders and not allow any immigrants.”
Why?
“(Note that I donāt understand economics.)”
I do, trickle down economics does not work. It could work in a perfect world but so would communism.
“What do you think there?”
I think it’s a fine line. Like when there were pictures on twitter of that naked gay dude with that elementary student. I’d get pissed even if he was straight. It’s just inappropriate.
They should definitely be allowed to marry. i don’t see any reason why they shouldn’t.
maybe rr doesn’t even know what he means by “libertarian”. he probably just means he wants to be able to buy steroids at the supermarket instead of in an alley.
it’s funny that rr should understand the false dichotomy that is nature vs nurture but at the same time not understand that all of the political “-isms” are dumb because… they confuse theory with outcomes, so that to speak of “political beliefs” is to speak nonsense.
the best government is not a government that does this and not that, it’s a government that changes in response to the needs of the governed in the particular time and place. the best government evolves, where the judgement of the governed is the equivalent of natural selection. the correct politics is a question of facts, not theories or beliefs.
Most people understand that mugabe. You’re obfuscating the issue. Based on the facts democratic socialism is what we need right now.
Most libertarians are actually not libertarian in the classical sense they’re just centrists who have been cucked by a two party system. RR isn’t libertarian in the strict sense otherwise he wouldn’t be pro life. But he also isn’t what you’d consider a typical conservative.
“almost all republicans were for open borders until trump fucktard.”
No they weren’t, educate yourself fucktard.
(Note that I donāt understand economics.)
i apologize. what rr meant was that he is an “or something”, as economic policy is what’s most central to libertarianism.
Modern right-libertarian ideologies such as anarcho-capitalism and minarchism co-opted[10][11] the word libertarian in the mid-20th century to instead advocate laissez-faire capitalism and strong private property rights such as in land, infrastructure and natural resources.[12]
i guess this isn’t what rr meant. but it’s the way americans use the term. maybe rr is south asian?
No he’s Italian. Stop being stupid.
it all depends on what you mean by democratic socialism. if you mean the US should become more like denmark you’re right. but if you mean a revolution where the people vote to nationalize all large businesses, that would probably cause a lot of problems in the short term. not because it’s a bad thing in itself but because any large abrupt change has lots of unforeseeable negative consequences. a danish style welfare state also requires restricting immigration and expelling invaders.
the current ruling party of denmark is the best ruling party on earth imo. it’s hard line on immigration and invaders and far left wing on economics by american standards.
i myself am in favor of mandatory gay marriage for filipinos. there are 100 million filipinos in an area the size of new mexico. that’s way too many.
“First recording of sanskrit was in northern syria”.
Mugabe, can you elaborate?
Anyways, the other thing about segregation that keeps being mentioned is funding for schooling and education. Many people say the blacks and coloureds got little funding and terrible schools.
50 years later, the funding has gone up substantially to public schools and the schools are still considered junk because of the R selected antics of our african colleagues.
Jim Crow legalised something that was and is always going to happen – white and asian students running away from black and some latino students. (especially central american people who are very violent).
If (((activists))) really cared, they wouldn’t mind ‘seperate but equal’ as long as the funding was equal – according to their reasoning. What they’re really trying to say is that blacks should have the same test scores as asians and whites (and jews?). We all know that will never happen. Even the people that campaigned against Jim Crow never thought that would happen.
Likewise blacks wont ever be as socially mobile as whites and asians. Nor produce the same amount of scientists, judges and people with acting ability. Nor write novels where themselves aren’t the central character. So we’re in for A LOT MORE PAIN if activists keep contriving to find ‘inequalities’ in the system and it won’t end until people say the truth about race.
See it as bodily health. It’s non-linear and interactive/epistatic. If someone said that an overdose of vitamin c is all you need to be healthy you’d call them crazy. But yet you believe that liberals think that education is the only factor.
but the truth about race doesn’t need to be autistic HBD.
norms of reaction are sufficient to make multi-ethnic societies impossible. because even if all the ethnicities have the same potential, they can’t have the same potential in any one society. some will rule and others be ruled and resent it.
The other truth about race is something that whites won’t like. Namely, if you really wanted to base the system purely on meritocracy/genetic talent asians and jews would dominate most third level education.
I personally do not think 3rd level education should be the only way we sort the wheat from the chaff in society. Most 3rd level education outside of stem subjects is fake news.
But I can’t think of any other ‘meritocratic’ way of sorting people into jobs. I think straight out IQ tests are even worse than the current way by the way.
If you don’t accept ‘meritocracy’ then you probably accept the principle of jus soli – whites have a right to pick whites to associate with in law firms and banking floors because its their institution. Nobody tells the Chinese communist party to endorse Uighur muslims or cantonese.
Or you could take a free marketing approach and say firms should be able to hire whoever they want based on ‘market conditions’ which basically means whites, asians and jews will get jobs and blacks and latinos will be ‘discriminated against’.
” if you really wanted to base the system purely on meritocracy/genetic talent asians and jews would dominate most third level education.”
Insanity! Look at the Pisa scores. East Asian countries score 0,2-0,5 SD above europeans, which is below what rushton would have predicted. Also consider that European teenagers spend much less weight to math grades than what north-east Asians do. So why did switzerland score equally to South Korea in math? Why did poverty tier Estonia socre highly???
PP needs to unban Jimmy…
not true in the US.
based solely on test scores whites would be represented at a little more than their current percentage of elite college students. asians and jews would be over-represented but not enough to crowd out whites. blacks and latinos and sasquatches would be almost un-represented.
so now you see the real purpose of affirmative action and subjective admissions criteria.
A purely ‘meritocratic’ system would reward hard work only and some reflection of talent i.e. productivity.
Salespeople and managing directors at banks and consultancies would have the best social skills and cold call the most clients. Judges would have the best knowledge of the law and do the most research before rulings.
IQ tests, 3rd level education etc are a proxy for productivity. But so are social stereotypes – e.g. tiger mom asian mothers make harder working kids.
This ‘meritocratic’ system would solely be an autistic end in itself as real world incomes are related to ‘non productive’ aspects like collective bargaining, luck, psychopathy, associating with people like you etc.
Basically I’m not sure anyone would want a purely meritocratic system as ‘the most just’ way of ordering an economic system.
The best system is kind of like what we have – a dynamic equilibrium where various factors are important at some times more than others. E.g. when the country is at war, the bravest soldiers get the promotions and medals, not the hardest working or smartest.The system reflects what the challenge is facing the society. By selecting the most productive people, you are basically saying society exists to create the largest possible economic surplus which is autistic.
now pill says “the best system is kind of like what we have”…
what a mossad agent.
no. the best system is more tests (= more meritocracy) but a lot more redistribution as well. a lot more.
Another great example of meritocracy being unfair is sport. As we know, most of the French national team that won the world cup was actually african. Or most of the USA math olympiad team was asian.
Somehow deep down, most people would intuitively say these are ridiculous outcomes even though the selection of the participants in these activities is almost 100% based on hard work + talent.
The corresponding paradox is why African nations are horrible at football generally and asians have rarely won the Fields Medal/Nobels. Is it ‘discrimination’ [redacted by pp, aug 8, 2019]
Thought of the day: If the West expelled every non native and they went back to their countries
(a) productivity in emerging nations would increase
(b) productivity in western nations would be about the same
(c) inequality in western countries would be lower
(d) inequality in emerging countries would be higher
Therefore the West would benefit, but emerging countries it would be a wash.
If “the West expelled every non native ”
America would be entirely non-white.
My impression of italians is that they are a lot whiter than I thought. People like Fenoopy kept posting pictures of dudes that looked almost pakistani.
I went to Sicily and can safely say, Italians look waayyy more european than middle eastern.
I also realised that the reason the Italian economy hasn’t grown for 20 years is that life is pretty good there already and theres no need to work harder. You could make the argument Italy’s elites are actually nice to their workers by letting them work so slowly or less than Americans and Brits.
work less, live more.
the ancients had a work ethic…it was for slaves.
luther had autism.
when the object is money per se the result is slavery and psychopathic masters.
You talk about understanding aesthetics and how high your social and verbal iq is yet you need to physically go to Italy to understand how Italians look despite having RR tell you how they look for more than 4 years.
this is how you know rr is lying about his ancestry.
Why would he lie about being italian? You are so stupid.
Hahaha the fraud Richard Lynn had one of his papers flagged for retraction.
Saini is the least credible person ever. She wrote a book about how superior her Indian related cast were and then another one spitting all the environmentalist nonsense. A bit like Raj Cherry about magic dirt (who married a girl from his tiny Kati cast).
Indian are like Jewish but so much more rough – see google CEO – thatās its comical.
My doorkeeper has more credibility than Saini.
Raj Chetty. Jati cast.
Ummm Saini’s part wasn’t really what I was highlighting. Where does she say that her caste is “superior”? What page?
It is a necessary assumption in all her book analysis. I donāt have it but just read the title :
Ā«Ā Geek Nation: How Indian Science is Taking Over the WorldĀ Ā»
Are the Geek people the muslim and the outcasts ? No itās her cast.
But even if it was Indian nation, itās still inconsistent with her new claims.
Pumpkin, how come after I did number span a ton of times, my letter span was the same score? My anxiety was pretty low when I did the letter span. I did it again some 5 months later or so, got a somewhat low score- my brain was in my normal state of being extremely foggy. Same with the coding subtest, I did it 3 times, the first time I was very anxious, the second time less anxious, and the third time not anxious whatsoever. The scores were an SD apart! What explains this? Even in normal settings, my brain is generally extremely cloudy, it only becomes clear when Iām madly obsessed with something, or when I have no anxiety.
Oh, btw, after I did the letter span a few fore times, I was less anxious, and I got my normal score.
You should do the IQ of Conan.
Harvard graduate, 6’4″, and he has a huge head.
Apparently he’s 100% Irish because he’s inbred. Which is hilarious because usually inbred folks have low IQ’s.
historically irish people were considered pretty dumb, but they may just have been propaganda. If I recall correctly (don’t hold me to this, because I vaguely recall someone citing this) But the most educated americans today tend to have Italian and Irish ancestry. Which makes sense when you consider that me and RR are easily some of the most intelligent people on the blog
i can tell how smart you are because you keep saying how smart you are. that’s always a give away.
I very rarely say how smart I am. The only thing that is certain as a fact is that I’m smarter than you. Deal with it.
you’re using the word “smart” incorrectly.
Deal with it
Still waiting.
I don’t think Italians are smart at all, but have the highest testosterone and are very aggressive. Irish on other hand have the highest verbal IQs and head sizes in terms of people of European ancestry. They have a lot of wit and comprehension ability of the English language. Plus, they went through a lot of selective pressures when coming to America and afterwards, so that probably made them smart as well.
Well I’m flattered. I’ve never taken an IQ test but I wouldn’t be surprised if I had a disproportionately large Verbal IQ. My head circumference is a little bit larger than average but I don’t have a broad forehead.
My white side is mostly Irish and secondly french. The rest is mostly Eastern European.
“but have the highest testosterone and are very aggressive.”
Source?
I’m not going to give you a source for what is clearly an opinion, RR. You’re one gullible guy to believe everything that comes from a scientific journal and not critically think for yourself about how the world works. Why not use the time you take to read and make judgments about the world for yourself.
But actually, people should be more like RR. I actually do believe that scientists and academics have the most credibility in their fields, so they must be listened to and understood. However, you also need to always have a healthy skepticism for what people tell you. That’s the only way to make progress because if you believe everything authority tells you then you’ll never be able to access the vast amount of knowledge that remains untapped.
That being said, yes, RR, Italians are meatheads. Don’t know the science behind why, but they just are. Probably have the best muscle-building genetics on average in the world, but can’t seem to really get beyond promoting their own agenda and understanding other cultures.
Italians are the most racist and close-minded of all Europeans. It’s disturbing to think about but its very true. They lack any real ability to relate to people of other backgrounds/cultures.
What do you think about the morality of germanics loaded? Please be detailed. I like detail.
āWhich makes sense when you consider that me and RR are easily some of the most intelligent people on the blogā
Thanks buddy. Same to you. I like your prose. Even though we disagree a lot, youāre a solid debate partner and I learn a lot from you.
Though that you and I are the most āintelligentā here, there isnāt that high of a bar imo.
My family is full of high-level cops, judges, detectives. I recall reading someone a while ago that southern Italians have a really high educational attainment or something like that in America. I’ll find cites later.
(post this one not the other, PP.)
That’s why I like you RR. We may not always agree, but at least you can debate. Getting Mugabe or Philo to have any sort of coherency is like pulling teeth. Theyd rather be racist.
I actually think Pumpkin has very intelligent commentors. They’re just drowned out by the especially loud idiotic majority
That’s interesting. My family is mostly blue collar who had high ranks in the military or were successful in trade work. The Filipino side were all business owners or drug dealers. Besides my little brother (who is a museum curator and wins awards for his inventions) and my aunt (who’s a successful photographer who went to college) I’m the most educated person and I only have a GED.
Minority**
My family is full of high-level cops, judges, detectives…because “the family” needs people on the inside.
smart is 20/20 looking down and blind looking up. but the one looking up doesn’t know he’s blind.
unz showed that the irish have miraculously gained 15 IQ points in 50 years or something like that and he explained this as a side effect of ireland’s economic development. ireland was a shithole and now it’s rich.
I wish I could still enjoy late-night talk shows like I did during the Obama era….I loved watching Conan – though I suppose he is the most tame out of all of them, in regards to politics. I used to enjoy the heck out of Jon Stewart (and he’s not so bad, even though he might occasionally tap into 1st stage TDS a bit). In fact, I had the app for Jon Stewart and Corbert Report if I missed episodes.
Man…those were the days.
the economic argument for restricting immigration is a bit disingenous as the economy has grown on a per capita basis despite the wave of fruit picking invaders. it’s only median income that has been stagnant for 50 years. the problem is one of distribution; the wage suppressing effects of mass immigration don’t need to be a problem if workers are getting other things. but mass immigration has negative non-economic effects, like lower trust, more unhappiness. diversity is the consequence of short term profit maximization, a stupid way to run a country, but the way all oligarchies are run.
economic migrants should be pitied, but in america the people who give up the most for letting the invaders in are the poor. the rich benefit. it’s evil. the reverse should be the case. but even germans don’t want to pay taxes for poor greeks and foreign aid is mostly wasted. the best thing to do for the developing world would be to spray a drug which made all of them into gays and lesbians.
On immigration: An observation I have had about Koch-type libertarians is that any discussion tends to lead back to some condescending lecture about comparative advantage mostly irrelevant to the conversation.
Any question they do not anticipate or canāt answer always leads some irrelevant talking point. They are NPCs.
For instance, āwhy do Ancaps fetishize BOTH learning new skills and a deterministic-view of IQ. Some people have too low of IQs to learn new skillsā= āREEEE you donāt understand economics 111!1!1ā.
When Molyneux was asked if the Luddite fallacy applied to AI (as AI will *very* quickly fill newly created jobs as well-leading to a temp work economy)- he just explained comparative advantage.
Lolbertarianism is mostly a meme ideology outside foreign policy and civil liberties.
it might also be that redistribution in the american situation would affect economic growth or would have affected economic growth in a way it would not in other situations and would not had immigration been held to its 1945-75 levels.
but it’s only a bit disingenuous because one can’t say that gdp per capita wouldn’t have grown even more, and in fact it did from 1945 to 1975, a period of very little immigration.
eric weinstein and george borjas say: immigration isn’t about immigrants. it’s about the redistribution of income from the 99% to the 1% and then calling any who object “racist”. immigrants, skilled and unskilled are what unions call “scabs”.
Where are my comments?
Youāre commenting under too many names. Weāre used to mug of pee doing that, but if others start it will be very confusing for readers
i told you.
i will take on melo and rr at the same time with one of my penises tied behind my back.
said:
August 9, 2019 at 7:27 am
The historical school held that history was the key source of knowledge about human actions and economic matters, since economics was culture-specific, and hence not generalizable over space and time. The school rejected the universal validity of economic theorems. They saw economics as resulting from careful empirical and historical analysis instead of from logic and mathematics. The school also preferred reality, historical, political, and social, as well as economic, to mathematical modelling.
this is obviously what economics should be and the only thing it can be. the reason for its replacement is the cargo cult motivated by math and physics envy and corruption, so that non-autistic economists can be shut out supposedly for their lack of rigor but really because they know the truth or may discover it. ideological subjects are always corrupt. their mavens are always just stenographers of power. psychology is an ideological subject obviously because abnormal psychology and individual differences and behavior genetics.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
“i will take on melo and rr at the same time with one of my penises tied behind my back.”
He’ll take us on with just one penis.
A bold move. Also a very gay one.
You heard it here folks Mugabe has finally come out of the closet.
why are you so sure that i have only two penises?
Oh God oh fuck!
I’ve made a grave miscalculation.
Pumpkin I may need to use your penis. No homo.
Mysterious occurrences in India…
Pumpkin, my coding score over three trials shifted about a standard deviation, each trial, I was less anxious. First trial, I was quite anxious, 2nd one, less so, 3rd one, had no anxiety. Practice effects are pretty much non existent in coding, so, could it be solely explained by anxiety?
Everyone here has an agenda to promote their own kind. Very disheartening. You would think intelligence would lead people to want to, or at least being able to, understand others. Unfortunately, it does just the opposite.
Highly-intelligent people usually can’t understand the point of view of others because their understanding of the world takes precedence over any other person’s. However, they can empathize with concepts and gain understanding with things that are separate from human experiences. As soon as someone invests their own emotions into what they’re talking about, intelligent people lose all credibility into understanding what you’re saying. They’ll believe it in a superficial way or believe that you believe it, but will never hundred percent give their mind room to actually understand where you’re coming from.
On top of that, intelligent people are literal-minded. They’re limited in thinking outside of rigid thought. Dumb people have very plastic minds while smart people kind of have very cemented understandings of the world, taking a lot to change them. That’s why unique experiences to an intelligent person have so much more of an impact than to a less intelligent person. However, intelligent people can have a wider understanding of what their experiences meant and what they gave insight into. Dumber people will always be easily imprinted on by their experiences but not all experiences matter to them the same way that it would for an intelligent person.
The final thing I’d probably say is that intelligent people have such troubled lives is because they let their experiences control them. They don’t detach themselves and think that others’ experiences hold as much weight to them as their own. So they have an inflated sense of confidence in what they believe. This can hinder them tremendously because they can’t learn from the experiences of others and instead always have to experience it themselves, causing them to get into troubling situations. Now why that happens is open to debate, but I think intelligent people are full of skepticism and until they can verify it, they won’t believe it.
So that’s just my musings on what the struggles of being intelligent are.
and there is one place where blacks’ test scores are as high as whites’. bermuda.
What type of rap songs would you approve me posting, Pumpkin? Rap is the new Baroque.
If you have something relevant to say about it, you can post any kind of rap, but simply spamming the comment section with videos is not good.
Something irrelevant
which is most likely?
1. epstein killed himself because sad.
2. epstein was given the “choice” to kill himself ala frank pentangeli.
3. epstein was murdered.
4. epstein is still alive and his “suicide” was just a way to get him out of the jail.
You never know but #3 seems the most likely to me. If he was blackmailing the Clintons on behalf of foreign interests, the exposure of a trial would be too risky for said interests
I think he was murdered too. I actually doubt it was the Clinton’s though, Trump’s a more likely candidate but it probably wasn’t him either. It could have been any number of rich douchebags trying to save their asses.
Either way there’s enough evidence still to put a lot of rich people away for a very long time.
Iām not suggesting it was the clintons. Iām suggesting he was blackmailing the clintons on behalf of foreign interests & those people didnāt want it to get out.
Yeah but if this conspiracy was as big as suggested, a lot of people more powerful than the Clintons had quite a bit to gain from his death.
How is Trump a more likely candidate?
Lets take what we know about the relationship between Trump and Epstein versus Bill and Epstein. Trump took one flight on the Lolita Express to either the island or New York. Mark Epstein said that Trump was probably seeking a flight back to New York. Bill took 27 flights to the Island, with many, if not all the flights escaping his secret service detail.
Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-A-Lago for sexual impropriety towards minors. His relationship with Epstein was that of a host having a good time with his guests. It shouldn’t be surprising that a billionaire who likes to party would meet other rich individuals that have the same proclivity towards partying and women; Epstein just turning out to be a complete monster and not having boundaries or limits like Trump.
What sounds more implicating here? How do you suppose Trump is behind anything here? Like, I’m honestly intrigued. I was recently made aware that #TrumpBodyCount is a thing, which is pretty wild. I’m still having a hard time understanding how liberals perceive certain things – how they acknowledge and yet disregard interconnections.
I don’t believe either Trump or the Clintons were involved in Epstein’s departure. And Epstein was probably a Mossad asset.
“Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-A-Lago for sexual impropriety towards minors. ”
No he kicked him out over a real estate squabble. They were both business man who tried to cut the other’s throat. Our president is not a moral powerhouse. H’es already been accused of rape at least twice. That bullshit story is being spammed so that he can distance himself from this as much as possible.
“His relationship with Epstein was that of a host having a good time with his guests. ”
They were eachother’s wingmans at parties and other social events.
“Epstein just turning out to be a complete monster and not having boundaries or limits like Trump.”
Trump has no boundaries or limits.
“Iām still having a hard time understanding how liberals perceive certain things ā how they acknowledge and yet disregard interconnections.”
This is such bullshit. Everyone looks out for their own interests. The only real conspiracy is that the rich stay rich and poor stay poor. It’s not ultimately a race thing, it’s not ultimately a political thing. Money and status transcends all of that. Cuckservatives are so deep in their “liberal media bias” bullshit that they can’t see the bigger picture. You do the exact same shit. Recognize some connections and completely ignore others.
Lion entertained the possibility of Obama killing andrew breitbart but is anti-conspiracy when it comes to Epstein. EGI?
EGI is complete bullshit. It’s so unfalsifiable. “Oh A jEw MaDe a STudY ThaT iNDiCateS JeWS aRe MoRe IntELLigeNt? iT’s oBVioUSLy FaKe BecAUse JeWs MaDe It!”
There are definitely people who attach their identity to their ethnic group but at the same time there is also a lot of peoe like me who give two fucks as to what their country of origin is doing.
It’s less about race and more about ideology. People like dumb and dumber ( you know who I’m talking about) have to cling to the accomplishments of their ancestors to feel any kind of self worth.
As a mixed race person itās only natural youāre going to be less tribal, as you donāt belong to any one tribe.
But trust me there are millions of people who care passionately about their tribe. Look at suicide bombers in the Middle East, the alt-right movement in the west, or the expulsion of Indians & Jews from Uganda & European countries respectively.
Humans are the most social animal. Itās inconceivable we wouldnāt prioritize group interests on some level, though the exact mechanism behind EGI is open to debate.
Haha PP’s response to Melo on EGI is that since he’s mixed he’ll be less tribal so that’s why he doesn’t believe it. Yes, that’s it. There can be no other reason for Melo’s disbelief on the matter.
Haha PPās response to Melo on EGI is that since heās mixed heāll be less tribal
Thatās exactly what EGI theory would predict because:
A) his parents themselves would be self-selected for low EGI given that they chose to outbreed & they would pass those low EGI genes to melo
B) melo would not look much like either parent race so what little EGI he had would have no outlet
What are “low EGI genes”?
Melo, I’d also add that just because one weights their interests on their ethnic group is not evidence for Rushton’s shitty theory.
Yes one neednāt invoke an evolutionary theory to believe humans are motivated by ethnic interests. The 2 arguments should be distinguished
EI != EGI
Rushton’s EGIs is based on Dawkins’ selfish gene theory which has been dispatched by Denis Noble.
“as you donāt belong to any one tribe.”
That’s so stupid. I’m not saying tribalism isn’t a thing, but genes are purely a correlation to that. There are many levels of tribalism. Race is just one of them. My points are that:
1. Tribalism has more to do with Ideology formed from cultural predispositions than any sort of genetic one. The relative homogeneity of Humans confirms this.
2. It can be used to hand wave any sort of criticism. Like you literally just did with me. You just proved my point.
My parents and their outbreeding habits has more to do with the fact that they’re liberal and not racist than it does with any sort of genetic tendency to be attracted to people of their tribe.
Ask any white girl who’s had a taste of brown cock, we’re better at it, the only reason outbreeding is not more common is simply the statistical probability of white women more likely being surrounded by mostly white dudes their whole life.
I am inevitable.
a southern italian claiming tribalism is just “ignunts” is sad or fake.
this is how you know rr isn’t any more italian than swank.
PP,
I think jayman is correct in the sense of EGI being false when defined as a function of kin selection, becuase too much kin selection stiffens evolution and I think jayman showed pretty well that the costs outweigh the benefits by showing just how little people of the same race are related. But I think EGI has another mechanism(s) that among humans is a bid more fluid and altered by mug of pees favourite phenomenon (aside from booze), reaction norms.
What makes organism breed and cooperate? The awnser is clusters of genes, not them being of the same sub species or even the same species. Clusters of genes can evolve to limit reproductive abilities with others to increase evolution by decreasing geneflow from the source population with various means, either by changing the way the animal develops it’s sexuality or making crossbreed offsprings infertile. The other mechanism for animal xenophobia has to do with unselected xenophobia that didn’t impair reproductive success. For instance certain geographically seperated sub species of animals become learned to like their own but can be learned to like the other groups if raised that way, this would be bad if not for it not for them being geographically isolated.
In humans this gets more conplex becuase of society but I suspect some genetic clusters inform us of a wide set of potential identities becuase of plasticity in the brain and feedback loops caused by genes. So meLo is right when he says it’s about ideology. And so EGI, or almost all social strategies, get generalised into culture, which in individuals and subgroups, and thusly the aggregate human sum, gets influenced by genes. I think EGI should be the observation into how outwardly appearance and ancestry/family can have a impact on ones statues amongst peers.
meLo,
“My parents and their outbreeding habits has more to do with the fact that theyāre liberal and not racist than it does with any sort of genetic tendency to be attracted to people of their tribe.”
Those are indirectly the same thing for many in the current culture.
“Ask any white girl whoās had a taste of brown cock, weāre better at it,”
Questionable in many semantic forms.
“I am inevitable.”
Many of the mix-raced people in this world probably won’t be “you”. It might become a fake culture loosely held together. First and foremost your an autistic (white) philipino born in the 20th century. Hopefully I’m not comming across as demeaning here.
“I am inevitable.”
Isn’t Thanos borderline race mixed? Was that intentionall lol?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thanos
“Thanos was born on Saturn’s moon Titan as the son of Eternals A’lars and Sui-San; his brother is Eros of Titan. Thanos carries the Deviants gene, and as such, shares the physical appearance of the Eternals’ cousin race”
“Those are indirectly the same thing for many in the current culture.”
Tribalism is more due to ideology which is what holds cultures together, like liberalism. very little to due with the genes ethnicities share.
“Questionable in many semantic forms.”
It’s not. We’re born with better motor control, which is also why we’re better dancers. Bitches love good dancers.
“First and foremost your an autistic (white) philipino born in the 20th century.”
Well I was diagnosed with Autism at a young age, as well as ADHD. Santo will tell you HFA is mostly a sensory problem, but I don’t have over-inhibition, and Ive never seen a neurologist so I don’t know.
After interacting with so many people on this blog I’ve come to grips with the fact that I’m not. There just too many people who’re socially inept like dumb and dumber. I’m not devoid of paranoia or intuitive thoughts, I just place them elsewhere and I dont allow “muh conspiracies” to consume me.
“Isnāt Thanos borderline race mixed? Was that intentionall lol?”
Heh. I’m glad somebody noticed that. I’m a nerd in some ways.
it’s been repeated he faced up to 45 years, but my guess is that was just selling the story and he wouldn’t have served much more time than he had previously. he wasn’t being tried for rape or for pimping.
People like dumb and dumber ( you know who Iām talking about) have to cling to the accomplishments of their ancestors to feel any kind of self worth.
melo can’t read, so she just makes shit up.
The nazi sympathizer is now trying to say he’s not a nationalist. Sad.
you need to learn to read desperately.
nationalism need have nothing to do with chauvinism, supremacism, clinging, etc. and mine doesn’t.
which word didn’t you unnuhstan?
the mongolians control your mind.
Nationalism is mutually inclusive to clinging. Deal with it.
I sometimes say people here are mind controlled by jews in a facetious way, but with Melo it truly is very sad to see the damage done by the jews to such a young confused and somewhat soft headed man.
Still waiting.
The answer is no.2.
yes. 1 and 4 are not possible. and 2 and 3 amount to the same thing.
4 isn’t possible because it would require too many people to stay silent, including the autopsy people who will report today.
What happened to Santo?
He got sick of you
Kinda sad. I hope he comes back. Ive actually been waiting for him to pop up. I didnt get him at first and was too hard on him but ive noticed that we got somewhat similar intuitions about things. He seemed more detailed and original in his assertions and i dissagreed with some of what he said so i think my couple of few questions would be interesting and give us some new light into his thinking.
This Epstein thing is front page news in the media. Thats how we know the rumours of it being a Mossad blackmail ring probably aren’t true. But I suspect some very notable people were involved.
On the other hand the media never talked about Pizzagate or Franklin with as much fervour – indicating that something very wrong happened.
franklin?
I sometimes wonder what life is like as a dumb person. I woke up this morning and saw my dad reading a prayer book. Then he sat in silence alone for about half an hour before going on a walk. He will then spend the rest of the day watching free tv.
They really don’t require much stimulation.
Another thing I’ve noticed about aspy and low IQ people is that they don’t have much of a sex drive. When I remember all the aspies and low IQ people I’ve met, they never talked about getting laid or going out.
Being dumb is relative of course. Maybe Chris Langan looks at us and laughs at the stupidity of some of these posts. But you get MDR – there’s only so much intelligence you need to be right about most things.
“thereās only so much intelligence you need to be right about most things.”
Do you have any evidence analogy as to why that’s true? I’ve always been insecure about not knowing enough.
Becuase that’s what dumb people usually say.
“When I remember all the aspies and low IQ people Iāve met, they never talked about getting laid or going out.”
That’s either becuase they got “better things to do”, define their identity by being “moral and civil”, or are sexually isolated/frustrated and get offended by talking about it. Don’t ugly women tend to be more prude? I’ve heard that. Aspes tend to need lots of comfort and timming to get personal.
There are many 80-100 iq people who talk about sex all of the time. Perhaps you mean extremely low iq?
“They really donāt require much stimulation.”
Maybe they do and can’t get it and need escapism or get headaches from using their brains too much. Also high IQ people need extra stimulation becuase of their ability to acquire resources and complexity to their identity, getting used to basal manifestations of needs and thusly amping up the novelty forming the aforementioned complexity. The complexity is also caused by greater plastic responses to the unatural environment of modern society.
a prayer book?
and no one believed me when i said pill was an ultra-orthodox mountain mongolian.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_Jews
I wish I was dumb. I wish I didn’t aspire to be more than what I can’t. I wish I could be easily assumed and contented by things, and not have to think far beyond my means. I wish I didn’t have to feel the urge to affect a certain character, because I seem so intrinsically tied to a particular group; I give off pretensions that are fruitless and reflect very little but the image around me. I wish I wasn’t so excitable and yearning for things that require conviction and effort. I wish I didn’t have to feel that I need to be and do more. I wish I could just sit down and enjoy the day, and not toil over things that I think I should know, that aren’t immediately beneficial.
The sedateness that follows being dumb seems much more attractive than whatever a moderately intelligent, but ineffectual person does. The success from it doesn’t matter, because it’s only relative to the dumb person, and doesn’t amount to very much in terms of happiness.
I wish I had an IQ of about 100 and a factory job that I could keep for 30+ years. It’s sad that today’s society robbed that away from people.
Why wonder about a life that you’ve already been given?
I’m looking up jobs in the public sector more and more these days. Its very hard to have a career and be schizo. But having a disability or non-conventional background is a slight plus in the public service since they have quotas for that.
Just to be clear, me on a bad day is still better than most people on a good day.
I’ve noticed a lot more mentioning of Russia in the media as a bete noir for everything, not just the 2016 election result. Of course, barely sentient retards like melo will use these as further kindling for their fires.
If Putin didn’t intervene in Syria against Zion, would we hear anything about russia? Answer: No.
Philosopher has a fetish for bears.
Putin intervening Syria allowed barely sentient retards like Philo to further stoke their flames.
I bet you believe in god too? Don’t you, cuck?
atheism is a form of autism.
Religiosity is a form of schizophrenia
Good thing I’m agnostic!
you’re not agnostic. you’re filipino.
I assure you I’m agnostic. My favorite soda is Dr. Pepper.
a black woman who straightens her hair is like an old man with a toupee and the toupee is the wrong color. this is a good reason to discriminate against black women. and then a lot of black women actually wear wigs. disgusting.
what you look like black women:
https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/55ce177014000077002e2f0e.jpeg?ops=crop_0_309_1750_1123,scalefit_720_noupscale
These cases are pretty egregious. But sometimes I can’t tell a person is wearing a wig. The guy from Adam Sandler’s longest yard movie…didn’t know it was a wig. Contrary to popular belief trumps hair is not a wig.
I think temporary hair implants are more common now. John Travolta uses them, otherwise hr would be almkst completely bald.
Black are also into other non-wig hair improvements like weaves and extensions. Some black women in the”hood” will spend a quarter of their paycheck on weaves, because they have to be redone periodically (like at least biweekly) or otherwise their real hair starts growing through and causes the weave to start to look bad.
i doubt tulsi straightens her hair and kinky hair isn’t universal even among full blooded polynesians. it’s more a melanesian trait. negritos too.
so negroes, negritos, melanesians, southern italians, mongolians have the kinky hair gene(s).
Pumpkin, what is the average block design, similarities, and vocabulary scores for Hispanics?
So anyone have thoughts on the new AOE 2 remaster? Looking forward to 300 hours of campaign gameplay and revised online offering. What do you think? Can’t wait for the remaster of AOE 3 next year too. Just really excited.
Pumpkin, is the average vocabulary score of Hispanics below their average matrix reasoning and block design scores?
Probably
Do you know where you can find the average scores for Hispanics? Is it published anywhere public?
melo is an example of another reason for open borders in addition to short term profit maximization and wage suppression, a purely political reason.
immigrants are much more easily (((brainwashed))) and thus rendered un-threatening to the power elite.
it’s much easier to brainwash someone about a country not his own especially when that country has a culture and a language not his own…
whether he’s in-country or an outside observer.
much easier to brainwash white americans about north korea than the uk or ireland.
it has nothing to do with immigrants in-them-selves.
this more-easily-brainwashed can be measured.
People who support trump are easily brain washed
Anti-Semites are easily brain washed
Schizophrenics are easily brain washed
white people are easily brain washed
Mugabe is therefore brain washed.
So PP talked about the beauty of East asians. I found this interesting thing in a short documentary about prostitution in Dubai. Chinese prostitutes get paid the least out of all races in Dubai! Arab women get paid like 7 times more than chinese prostitutes. Even black women get higher wages (which i found suprising), and while that might have to do with eastern africans being counted (they look alot like arabs/egyptians but with darker skin), the video doesnt specify specific regions of africa, but it shows plenty of west african women doing business.
But maybe this has do do with the people staying there for only sex might be crazy and therefore ugly, but wouldnt that apply to all the groups?
interesting, i would say is because caucasian women are the most attractive in average (because of over-representation in the media, caucasoid traits are the world standard for beauty and everything that is too far away from it is seen as ugly.
but chinese who have never been in contact with modern civilisation might find their own more attractive. beauty is just a matter of what is seen as the norm
Are you the real Masaman?
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1vVNQN-TCy8d3Mb_Owr2Kw
I agree that perception of beauty has large and in some cases total environmental determination. Some enviromental things seem very hard to change, sometimes large and sometimes small in effect. For instance prefering young people has to do with environment in my opinion, but changing the societal value of young people and making the developing brain not spend time with young/younger people makes it almost impossible for the majority of people to authentically love old people in a normal way. I wonder if the same is true for different populations, maybe.
If you really are the true Masaman, you should probably rethink your video on japanese origins. It seems like its more complex than just yayoi and jomon people being the unmixed ancestors of the japanese, but that both of these populations (or atlseast the Jomon) were mixed race and that several other populations migrated to japan. For instance Ainu people have been found to have much altaic/mongol/turkic/siberian/arctic ancestry. And similarities between jomon and koreans have been found. And yayoi might have been the ancestors of koreans (atleast south koreans) by looking at differences at haplotype and skull shape. And There is evidence of Jomon having no denisovan admixture. And some populations in southern japan are much lower in height, indicating ancestry from south east asia, or maybe pre-Han expansion south chinese (possibly similar to modern day south east asians, or maybe the negritos), which some posit japan to have ancestry from.
Puppy. Why do you never answer any of my questions but always answer Rahuls? Are you angry with me?
Puppy
How do sasquatches score on spatial and quantitative reasoning? Is the scores better when they are sober? Would practicing help them?
Apparently nobody knows how Epstein became a ‘billionaire’ on Wall Street. Nobody within the industry heard of him. So some speculate he was running a ponzi scheme like his fellow semite Bernie Madoff.
I know for a fact he was a teacher, or lecturer in a state college. How he parlayed that into becoming a billionaire who owned an island and yacht is really suspicious.
The other popular conspiracy theory is that Epstein was a front for Mossad. But its a bit outrageous Mossad would give him all that money to buy an island and yacht just to maybe entrap people on child abuse video tapes.
There was definitely many powerful people that wanted him dead. One of his accusers also has named Alan Derschowitz and Prince Andrew as paedophiles. Suspect there is more names of this calibre.
he did run a ponzi scheme with another fellow mongolian who went to prison for it, but epstein was never prosecuted. his money came from this and from wexner. he was also good friends with leon black and some other mongolian money man. they may have been clients. or his may have just had dirt on them. blackmail was vicky ward’s theory from way back.
He became a billionaire by blackmailing other rich pedophiles.
he was a teacher at an elite manhattan high school pill. what’s wrong with google in your country? he lied on his resume.
more surprising is what he sounded like. call me prejudiced but he sounded like a typical nyc guido or a mongolian imitation…like andrew dice clay. just the way he sounded should’ve been a yuge social handicap in the society he inserted himself in. the tapes are on bloomberg.
This book Im reading about Teddy Roosevelt and Taft is brilliant. Teddy reminds me a bit of trump in some ways. Although Trump himself, says hes more like Andrew Jackson.
In terms of policy though Roosevelt and Trump were opposites, although its not mention what Roosevelt stance on immigration is. The US was pretty much open borders then as there was still a lot of land to settle out west.
tr believed that colonial americans and their descendants were the herrenvolk.
not making that up. he wrote about it.
the now [redacted by pp, 2019-08-15] blogger “n/a” was the same. and the puerto rican who comments on lion’s blog and here sometimes is a spanish supremacist.
so the question is if so superior why not master any more?
answer: because won’t play dirty OR because have good life, leave untermenschen to stew in their own foul smelling juices.
i don’t know where to look for the answer, but it’s an interesting question…what is the living standard of un-mixed europeans in latin america?
They overlap a bit in their support for populist policies (Trump nominally, anyway…)
ideally trumpy is an augur of a new Progressive era to come like McKinley…Bernie will be too old for 2024 and I’m not sure who, if anyone, will be in a position to take up the mantle… Warren was GOP until 1996…and idgaf about UBI for free childcare or whatever other pseduo populist crap she’s hawking
The original industrialists/robber barons were all about open borders Ellis Island statue of liberty to get cheap warm bodies in the factories. The Republicans freed the slaves but then they proceeded to go on their own cheap labor binge…
Teddy was the beginning of the end of that along with some trust busting and fighting on behalf of labor…that’s similar to what DJT campaigned on anyway…. although he was a hardcore imperialist, opposite of Trump (nominally)
today professor shoe demonstrates once again [redacted by pp, aug 14, 2019] his worldview is self-contradictory. [redacted by pp, aug 14, 2019]
of course it takes more than IQ to be aware of the contradictions in one’s worldview. and it takes a high IQ just to have a worldview, and an even higher IQ to have a worldview of one’s own rather than the one provided him. (and the one which is provided is not internally consistent.)