I’m bombarded by so much email that often I don’t respond, but this fan was especially persistent, and since his or her questions were high quality and since he agreed to participate in my influential people survey, I decided to reply here. The questions are in bold, with my answers below each one.
Q1. My current understanding is that there is a genetic potential which determines your IQ. Is it possible that that genetic potential may never be reached? I am 22 and during my childhood I received very poor nutrition and very little brain stimulation.(due to poverty i My concern is that my IQ potential may have permanently been stunted. Can I do something about it?
From what I’ve read, education and learning new skills will cause you to score higher on IQ tests, but that begs the question: are you actually smarter or just more test-wise? For example, in the famous Milwaukee project, infants born to low IQ mothers in poor locations were given six years of intensive intellectual stimulation which raised their IQs 32 points above those of the control group, and about a third of that gain lasted eight years after the treatment stopped. The problem is, those added IQ points made them virtually no better at scholastic achievement tests than the control group, suggesting the experiment merely made them more IQ test savvy, and not any faster at learning new material.
Q2. What are some of the accessible ways to increase IQ? Till what age is it possible?
It’s always possible to acquire new skills and cognitive habits, and if these happen to be sampled by the IQ test you’re taking, your nominal IQ will improve. But IQ is supposed to measure your capacity to learn new things or cognitively adapt to relatively novel problems. Education and training doesn’t seem to transfer much to unfamiliar tasks, but since the content of even culture reduced IQ tests is not entirely unfamiliar, many forms of training will spuriously improve your score but it may not much improve your ability to learn new things.
Of course critics will argue that virtually all individual differences in non-pathological cognition reflect differences in training and experience and that “novel problem solving” is a misnomer.
As for smart drugs and brain training software, I’ve known some true believers but I remain very skeptical.
Q3. Can we expect in the near future for it to be possible to increase IQ through technology? And I mean in people who have already been born.
In a way we already have. One no longer needs as much spatial ability because they can use a GPS. One no longer needs as much ability to learn and remember facts because they can google them on their mobile devise. How far technology is from improving the physical brain, I don’t know.
Q4. What do you think of Mensa’s testing standards? And how is 98 percentile intelligent. That is like 1 in 50 people. It seems to me that in a developed country like the US, anyone who is anybody(techie, artist, wall street, industrialist, philosophers, professors) easily comes in the 98 percentile. Because otherwise where are the smart people.
98th percentile is actually extremely intelligent. To put it in perspective, when it comes to height and fat-free body weight, the 98th percentile for young U.S. non-Hispanic men is about 6’4″ and 220 lbs respectively which is taller and more muscular than most of the World’s most successful athletes.
The above chart shows the average height and weight of the most elite athletes in various sports, but keep in mind that these are just averages and many supreme athletes will be half a foot shorter and dozens of pounds smaller than average for their sport.
If the 98th percentile on physical traits is not required to succeed in a field as competitive and meritocratic as elite professional sports, why would the 98th percentile on cognitive traits be required to succeed in fields like technology, art, business or academia? Even students at the most selective universities in the entire World do not average more than about the 95th percentile (IQ 125) when given comprehensive cognitive tests that were not used in their selection process, and in many creative and technical occupations, the academic requirements are not high.
Only among the most spectacular achievers (self-made multibillionaires, U.S. Presidents, Nobel Prize winners in science) does the average IQ seem to rise to above 130, and even then, there’s a significant minority with IQs below 115, sometimes way below.
The reason Mensa’s requirement doesn’t sound high to you is because 1) tons of people exaggerate their IQ (I used to claim mine was 156!), and 2) of those who tell the truth, many take poorly normed internet tests, and/or cherry-pick the best score from the many tests they did take, and as a result, far more than 2% of America can qualify for Mensa.
Q5. What is your IQ?
About 135
Q6. How is memory related to IQ. Is memory constrained by genetics too, or is it possible to do something about it?
Specific types of short-term memory are not that strongly related to IQ, but overall memory across many domains as well as working memory (i.e. manipulating what you’re trying to remember) and long-term memory are more strongly related to IQ, but not as strongly as tests of abstract reasoning, verbal comprehension, acquired knowledge, and spatial analysis.
It’s possible to improve your memory through various strategies like word association and rehearsing input, and it might be possible to improve very specific kinds of memory but it’s probably not yet possible to much improve spontaneous recall or overall memory.
Q7. What do I need to do and have to join some some serious research/effort to better understand/do something about the IQ question? I think a lot of good work is happening in China?
You need to graduate with honors from the most prestigious university you can get accepted in, avoid controversy, and try to publish articles in peer reviewed academic journals. And you need to do all this while you’re still young because youth is a huge competitive advantage in virtually every field but especially academia.
Is looking into IQ your full time work?
No, I wasn’t a great student (hard to believe but true) because I spent all night obsessing over controversies on the internet and then slept in so late I missed class.
Pumpkin Person 
there actually can be a feminist purpose behind high heels.
but the heels would have to be too high to wear.
men and women differ by 5.5 to 6 inches in height, on average.
so a woman with short hair and no makeup might wear heels at a very formal event just to get closer to the male average.
lookism and heightism are as real as classism and racism.
it’s also odd that pill should identify macron with denmark.
in the long run macron is absurdly anti-danish.
as i’ve said. WW III is happening now, and germany is winning.
it’s just that germany’s victory isn’t military.
it isn’t conscious.
this means that germany may appear to act against its own interests…inviting 1m syrians…yet germany still wins.
the personification of nation states does describe reality, but this reality is fiction/jive from the individualist/anglo-saxon pov.
a united europe is bad for denmark. very bad.
tell me why i’m wrong.
fritz haber was danish.
he was the father of chemical warfare.
could it be that german danes still sympathize with germany?
a united europe with the uk, switzerland, and scandinavia under the euro…
that would be a great plot for a novel about ODESSA.
and yet it seems this is what’s going to happen.
but against pill i do not believe that…
1. denmark is organized
2. denmark is superhuman
as lineker said
Football is a simple game. Twenty-two men chase a ball for 90 minutes and at the end, the Germans always win.
https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/g/garylineke422219.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ODESSA
” but against pill i do not believe that denmark is organized”
well it looks like you failed the only legitimate IQ test
you and pill have yet to give any evidence.
maybe i’m weird but i do fantasize about jewish women if they’re half decent. i fantasize that she asks me to dress up like a member of the SS while we do it.
black men probably fantasize about white women for the same reason, that they will pretend to be a rapist burglar and she’ll love it. my guess is this is how afro got to the century mark. except he wasn’t pretending.
maybe i’m weird but i do fantasize about jewish women if they’re half decent.
Ok, good you content yourself with half decent Jewish chicks, the decent ones are not for you, they fall for JJ types of guy.
black men probably fantasize about white women for the same reason, that they will pretend to be a rapist burglar and she’ll love it.
No, only creeps like you fantasize about such scenarios.
my guess is this is how afro got to the century mark. except he wasn’t pretending.
Nope, it’s just about being handsome, balanced and into heterosexual women.
I give evidence every day. You’re starting to go into the Pumpkin/RR need someone standing with a gun beside the victims body and slitting his wrist and writing a note in his blood saying he did it. Getting there….
i assume that by “heterosexual women” you mean gay men.
afro darling straight men never declare, “i’m horny.” and they never use the word “creep” to refer to other men. unless it’s a joke.
so you’re either female or an extremely effeminate gay man.
which is it?
I don’t give a shit, I’m French and I use whatever word that makes sense to me.
Now if you wanna reach the century mark, just stop being a creep, brush your teeth, look good and forget your drug addicted lesbians.
I use the word “creep” to refer to men. Some men are creepy, it is what it is.
I use the word “creep” to refer to men. Some men are creepy, it is what it is.
Well you can sometimes be a bit feminine. Not often, but sometimes.
But then you have the dignified excuse of self-proclaimed low T.
It’s not masculinity or high T that much predicts a guy is straight i don’t think, but perhaps the ratio of the two.
High T + low masculinity = gay man
Low T + high masculinity = straight man
As for the word “creep” it’s sometimes said by female students about the male professors they fear being left alone with.
I hear it said by young women in slasher films and facts of life reruns from the 70s or 80s. In a typical sitcom of old, a girl will call a man a creep right before she pours a pitcher of beer over his head
Please, you, the guy who’s a fan of Oprah and who’s scared to go out alone at night or Mug of pee, the guy that’s not attracted to the female body and feminine looks have no masculinity lessons to give. Unless your only purpose is to make everybody cringe.
And yeah, a guy that’s creepy is just a creep. Mug of pee is creepy, so he’s a creep. There is nothing more about this word. Since women are the victims of creeps they might say it more often but there is nothing feminine about calling a creep a creep when you see one.
Same with horny. On a day I’ve been sexting my girl all day and all I had in mind was to come back home to fuck her, it’s called being horny. It happens to a lot of very good people and I don’t know any other word. What’s really gay is when your girl doesn’t turn you on and all you have to say about her is mug of pee-like bullshit like “beauty is in the eyes”. There is a time a woman will tell herself “so he doesn’t want my ass, must be a faggot”.
I go out at night alone all the time. I just enjoy exaggerating how scary stuff is because I’m a horror fan
And i have a geeky obsession with Oprah’s brain size; I’m psychologically very different from most Oprah fans and don’t fit in with them.
I go out at night alone all the time. I just enjoy exaggerating how scary stuff is because I’m a horror fan
LMAO, you ain’t serious… How do you get to thinking that the story of a random guy just hanging out alone at night can be made scary?
And i have a geeky obsession with Oprah’s brain size; I’m psychologically very different from most Oprah fans and don’t fit in with them.
It’s more than that, you quote her quite often, she “cured” your homophobia, it seems you remember all episodes of her show… Don’t lie to yourself, Oprah is much more than your laboratory rat.
You’re right she’s more than just a lab rat to me, but the the geeky brain size obsession is the core of the interest.
One last thing: can you explain why you’re so often throwing tantrums? Like I can clearly see half of our conversations ending with you getting like:
There is a time a woman will tell herself “so he doesn’t want my ass, must be a faggot”.
afro is dumb and extremely weird. what he’s saying is that if his girlfriend was a vegetable but had a nice ass he’d do her in her hospital bed.
stop pretending afro. you’re a gay man, and that’s ok. just stop promoting your gayness please.
afro is definitely High T + low masculinity.
every time he has sex with a woman he imagines santo.
must be hard to be afro.
of course by “sex with a woman”, i mean afro is pegged by a woman. sad!
LMAO, no, I’d never do my girl if she was unconscious, that’s rape and I like to hear her scream, breath, writhe and scratch my back out of pleasure… but I’d never do her either if her beauty was just in her eyes.
Just question yourself, if you’ve been led to give up on love, it’s because your poor ex girlfriends found no satisfaction with having sex with the eyes.
peepee is a little black boy?
i thought so.
i never said eyes were enough.
but i do prefer it if she’s conscious. unlike you and bill cosby.
but it’s pointless. english is your 15th language.
does she like it when you scream, “yes! santo! yes!”?
OMG…I read this comment thread on my phone while hanging out a bar/restaurant type place…almost died laughing (in public)!
[encouraging troll behavior redacted by PP because I would like Mug of Pee to stop bullying, June 14, 2017]
I don’t scream, I roar.
You totally said being attracted to a woman’s body is gay and feminine looking girls are unattractive. You said beauty is in the eyes and other bullshit that makes no sense to an heterosexual man.
Anyway, you’re the sexually inactive one in this conversation so it’d be wiser for you to keep your judgments and “advice” to yourself.
Germany is occupied by america. Its secret police spy in their own politicians and give tye info to tge nsa/mossad (same thing).
The jees are organised. Look at the dismantling of russia. Look at why khordovsky was booted when he tried to take the media and rothschild facilitated his return to the uk. Macron worked for rothschild!!
The cfr, aipac and of course the fact this keeps historically happening indivate they organise for political cause. Like many minority groups. Theyre just far more effective vis my nathan rothschild comment above. Like the italians they orgabise and dont mind breaking rules. But they have a higher iq about it.
To the point their media and novies condition one to not even consider they could or it being morally evil to question certain facts in their natrative. You cabt even qyestion the facts.
Ie. Its a fraud.
Philosopher, what do you think caused high empathy in Westerners compared to other races that evolved in cold environment and/or had a centralised state early in their History (like chinese & russians)?
I don’t ask PP because he only have is incomplet cold weather theory and think Asians are less sociopathic than Whites (LOL!)
Not so much that I believe that, as that I WANT it to be true because it better fits Rushton’s elegant model and you know how much I love elegance.
But I have suggested more complex models than merely cold winters but it’s hard to come up with any HBD models when the data upon which it’s based is not always reliable. For example Mug of Pee argues that whites only recently became empathetic (implying a cultural explanation) while Phil78 argues that white empathy has a long history.
“For example Mug of Pee argues that whites only recently became empathetic (implying a cultural explanation) while Phil78 argues that white empathy has a long history.”
Define “recent” and “long history”. My point what that it arisen in Manoralism and the natural that sort of outbreeding creates. Without Context on defining history, that could be seen as “recent” in White History.
Second, define “empathetic”. If you mean post imperial forms of such then of course I see that as recent but not an abrupt discontinuous behavior that came out of nowhere.
If you reject that idea, then that punches holes in your earlier arguments on genetic diversity and ethnocentrism (genetic diversity itself being closer to individualism versus collectivism rather than ethnocentrism itself based on HBDchicks research on the topic).
*natural results.
The whites I meet in everyday life seem more empathetic than East Asians, but Lynn argued East Asians were the least psychopathic race, but I also know Lynn can sometimes be a little sloppy.
Lynn can be more than “a little sloppy”. His “data” on Italian IQ is garbage. He’s a charlatan. And don’t blame it on his age.
Well, finally I probably underestimated you PP, and overestimated Philosopher.
[paragraph redacted by PP, June 12, 2017]
PP is very humble when talking about subject he doesn’t master. Philosopher is overly confident, which make him sometime make some dumb mistake.
Also, I would agree with Lynn that Asians don’t have personality traits that are often associated with sociopathy like narcissism, extrovertion, being hot-blooded and violent….etc. But in absolute it’s pretty clear that they have lower empathy than Whites for other human beings & life forms (look how they treat animals in China).
Btw Lynn argued that women were something like 4 IQ points dumber than men, what do you think PP ?
Btw Lynn argued that women were something like 4 IQ points dumber than men, what do you think PP ?
Lynn’s argument was based on one 1) the male > female brain size advantage, and 2) Lynn’s assumption that IQ tests are biased against men because they don’t measure enough spatial, and thus falsely equate men and women, but:
1) I suspect the male brain size advantage greatly diminishes when body size is properly adjusted for, since men are not only taller and heavier, but have more intrinsic muscle mass per pound
2) Yes IQ tests don’t measure enough spatial ability which is a biased against men, but they also don’t measure enough social cognition and executive function which is a bias against women.
“Btw Lynn argued that women were something like 4 IQ points dumber than men, what do you think PP ?”
Bullshit, like a majority of Lynn’s claims.
Hey truth teller. Care to tell me what things that commentators of this blog have mastered?
Lunacy is well mastered on here.
weschler removed items from the WAIS which highlighted a gender gap
1) I suspect the male brain size advantage greatly diminishes when body size is properly adjusted for, since men are not only taller and heavier, but have more intrinsic muscle mass per pound
I thought adjusting and controlling for enough variables could lead to any desired conclusion, someone even called it the “sociologist fallacy”.
Can you fill me in?
Whether to control or not to control depends on the question you’re asking
No, it depends on how two variables are consistently shown to influence each other to the point that this relationship will cause flaw in the date if not controlled for.
Which depends on what question you’re asking
The only question is: how close to laboratory conditions do I want to analyse data?
The only question is: how close to laboratory conditions do I want to analyse data?
You don’t even know what the laboratory conditions should be until you know what you’re asking. If I want to learn more about the genetics of obesity for example, do I control for caloric intake when analysing the identical twins raised apart? It depends on whether I want to know if their tendency to convert calories to fat is genetic, or if I just want to know if obesity is genetic, regardless of whether the genetic cause is metabolic, behavioral, or includes both.
That will have to be the last word.
Care to tell me what things that commentators of this blog have mastered?
None, but some talk like they do.
The problem is that psychopathy, as it’s commonly conceptualized, is multi-faceted (or multi-dimensional). Whites seem to be higher on the narcissism/self-aggrandizement factor of psychopathy (at least Scotch-Irish/Mediterraneans/Slavs), while Asians seem to be higher on general sense of callousness– which they substitute with a fake politeness that’s not sincere, in my experience, and that’s a result of their obsequiousness to authority and desire to avoid confrontation at all costs in formal settings.
In other words, guilt vs. shame– they produce different types of psychopathy.
In other words, guilt vs. shame– they produce different types of psychopathy.
How guilt culture produce psychopathy ?
East Asians’ lack of psycho is their undoing to boredom and unremarkableness.
Notice East Asians’ lack of artistic talent — lack of creativity. It’s the reason!
Lynn argued lack of psychopathy made East Asians less creative relative to their IQs. I argued it might be lack of psychosis.
But MeLo argues East Asians are more creative.
The key component is testosterone, which most East Asians lack, due to evolution as a result of societal/cultural pressures.
Of course, we are talking about the recent Mongoloid variant which Lynn, Rushton and other HBD “scholars” were discussing. It’s likely that the older Mongoloid phenotype was still prevalent 1000 years ago, during the times of the Mongol Empire. And this phenotype survived outside of the Confucian-bureaucratic societies, which produces the “beta” Asian types. The Mongols and the Huns before them, came from the Steppes and were nomadic. The Japanese were semi-nomadic, and they are also the least “Confucian” of the civilized East Asians.
The original Mongoloid was probably like the Caucasoid in physical features and also behavior. Not domesticated, and more psychotic, but probably less so, when comparing to the Caucasoid.
Remember, Western Euro Civ is superior – simply because of civic engagement of its citizens. non-whites do not have. East Asianese can create cities, but they are not dynamic or interesting.
Remember, it’s cities. It’s aesthetics in these cities which is the reason for everything discussed on this blog. Only non-anglo prole Whites create the best cities.
All those negative White traits like narcissism and psychoticism, are necessary ingredients for human motivation — which is why Whites are the most proactive in making things move n shake. East Asianese generally lack them which is why they lack the initiative to make things happen. The Japanese are more prevalent with these traits, and thus are the best of the East Asianese. The modernization of Japan never happened in China, and will never happen, simply because Chinese are sorely lacking in narcissism and psychoticism.
Well, this is highly speculative on my part, but I’m willing to bet that a) psychopathy is fairly rare in guilt cultures and b) the psychopathy that does crop up tends to be in the form of loner psychopaths, or more individualistic forms of psychopathy (if that makes any sense).
How can guilt exist without shame?
executive function which is a bias against women.
How women have better executive function ?
women have better executive function ?
I suspect so, but can’t find many studies confirming or debunking this.
Can you elaborate ?
Ok, I reformulate:
Can you elaborate on why you suspect women have better executive function than men ?
Because women have a reputation for being better at multitasking and the hemispheres of their brains are said to communicate better and they seem to have better social skills.
Are we under occupation?
1. Yes
2 no
3 we are controled bya da corporations manz
4 we are controlled by the un
5. We are controlled by straight old white men huz huz
Anythi g but
We are controlled by the highest iq race with no frontal lobe.
Anythi g but the right answer.
Possibly martians is more entertai ed in academia showing not the acadmeics have no brains but no balls.
Hux huz.
RR quoting a jew paper ‘disproving’ R/K had me thinking about why gentiles are so easy to fool with sophistry and word games.
For example, most of our economics academia is based on the non sequiter of
(a) humans are rational
(b) lets model on the basis they are supercomputers with no social lives
(c) we are only doing it to see how it would work
(d) this is how the world works now make policy to reflect how the world should work
There are 4 errors in that porpositional flow. And yet, gentiles never get it! Marx got it 200 years ago and people are STILL making the same basic logical errors.
It makes me realise that its not the argument per se that wins over people, but the conditioning of people to follow blindly and not ask quesitons that wins. Nobody wants to be the nail that stuck out against this ‘body of evidence’ (where?!). Its herding. Its related in many cases to aspergery K selection, but in more instances its related to being conditioned to follow rather than lead in thought.
All it takes is for a man with balls, not necessarily brains to say:
Do I Dare?
And indeed there will be time
To wonder, “Do I dare?” and, “Do I dare?”
Time to turn back and descend the stair,
With a bald spot in the middle of my hair —
(They will say: “How his hair is growing thin!”)
My morning coat, my collar mounting firmly to the chin,
My necktie rich and modest, but asserted by a simple pin —
(They will say: “But how his arms and legs are thin!”)
Do I dare
Disturb the universe?
In a minute there is time
For decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse.
^^One of the greatest pieces of art in the past 300 years^^^ – The Love Song of JS Prufrock by TS Eliot.
And indeed there will be time there will be time,
for evening primrose and debates with swine,
My patience is waxing weary thin,
This career waned several years ago.
(And they will say how he could have been a better worker!)
leading is more difficult the more complex the society. in the present even the leaders have no idea how the system works. the leaders are themselves sheep. sheep leading sheep. not too long ago the economic system was local and easy to understand.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manorialism
or as Shaw said,
Independence? That’s middle class blasphemy. We are all dependent on one another, every soul of us on earth.
“RR quoting a jew paper ‘disproving’ R/K had me thinking about why gentiles are so easy to fool with sophistry and word games.”
So. Anything you don’t agree with is sophistry and word games? That’s not an intellectual position to hold. Saying Jews this Jews that in response to a paper is not an argument but a fallacy. You should know this, PHILOSOPHER.
Ad hominem is a viable argument.
No it is not. It is fallacious. You use fallacies because you cannot address the factual nature of rebutting Rushton’s erroneous use of r/K selection theory.
Aspergers people disagree.
People who are interested in the truth agree. Appealing to motive is retarded. Any kind of fallacies in a supposed intellectual discussion is retarded.
I hope you’re not spewing the same bullshit that Afrosapiens and I are going to rebut in a few days. If you can’t address 5he arguments, point out false premises or conclusions then you must accept the argument.
This is how things work PHILOSOPHER.
I’ve given my argument. You are talking about agents of change being the actual reproductive strategy. I am talking about the reproductive strategy causing the agents. And my agents walk and talk. Your agents belong in a history museum with fossils and extinct animals.
Also, I don’t quote hatchet men with a delerious sophist agenda and track record like Weizmann who I investigated when Gypsyman similarly brought him out. He has 6 or 7 papers quoted again and again by the same 7 idiot academics.
Its a fuckin circle jerk where they all corroborate each others lies.
NO WOOKIE WOOKIE> THERES NO SUCH THING AS BARBARIANS>ITS YOUR IMAGINATION.
IMaaGGINaTTTTIOOOOOOn!! IM-A GINATIOONN!!!
Joseph Graves: Joseph Graves: Even if r- and K- theory were correct, I showed that Rushton applied it backwards. By the theory, Africans should be K- selected (K selection occurs in stable environments, such as the tropics) while r-selection was to be favored in fluctuating environments, such as the temperate zones. So by Rushton’s reasoning, Africans should be more genetically capable of intelligence, and Europeans/Asians less.
Sure pal.
it’s not fallacious. it’s fellatious.
He has 6 or 7 papers quoted again and again by the same 7 idiot academics.
LMAO, Rushton Jensen and Lynn would never do that. Nope, their circle is much circle is much more exclusive and has one necessary requirement for inclusion: not being a specialist.
Pumpkin,
Hbds love to talk about “heritability” of psychological and cognitive traits, but it would be interesting to think about “RACIAL heritability.” We know that the level of heritability is high when we have assortative mating patterns, and yet it decreases from the moment we have a mixture of subgroups, but also depends on the intrinsic degree of heritability, the dominance of a certain trait or about a combination of traits.
Note that white Caucasians are the most recessive in this sense, and not only in relation to their physiological phenotypic traits but also about psychological traits. When we have a purebred multiracial couple, black and white, the African characteristics will in the most of the time predominate over the European characteristics. It also seems to be the case with racial psychological characteristics.
It would also be interesting to know if this is a general pattern if the basal or ancient traits of a species tend to predominate over the more recent features and the mechanisms that produce this situation. The concept of recessive is purely intrinsic such as when we mix coffee with milk and the dark color of the coffee predominates over the light color of the milk. Or the degree of recessiveness is dependent on the demographic proportion of traits, the more common the trait is, generally speaking, within Of a species, more dominant, more unusual, more recessive.
Interesting question. My response is that mixed balck whites are on average smarter than pure blacks abd more empathetic and kind.
I dont take your psychological heritability argument.
Look at donations to charity p cap to find the answer.
”Interesting question. My response is that mixed balck whites are on average smarter than pure blacks abd more empathetic and kind.”
And primordially, the children of mixed couples evidently tend to look ” half-way, ” though usually looking much more to black than to white.
If I could estimate the degree of heritability of the Caucasian phenotype, especially Northern European / Nordic type [eyes and light hair], I would kick
Close to 70% / aka 0,7 [;)] between them;
0.3-0.5 among other European sub-races;
Very low among other breeds / when mixed with other races.
”I dont take your psychological heritability argument.
Look at donations to charity p cap to find the answer.”
I don’t understand this part.
Another one who doesn’t understand heritability at all. But what else can we expect from him?
Donations to charity shows empathy.
Philosopher, it looks like psychological traits aren’t normally distributed.
A recent article by Ernest O’Boyle and Herman Aguinus (2012) is therefore worthy of note, because it challenges the ubiquity of the bell-shaped curve as a description of human performance. These researchers looked at a large variety of objective performance measures from such domains as entertainment, science, politics, and sports and found that their distributions rarely fit a bell curve*.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-good-life/201205/whom-the-bell-holds
afro you should treat your future spouse, santo, with greater respect. otherwise he might cheat on you with another man.
To answer the commenters question on why whites developed high trust/empathy i dont know. Im aware asian aspergers people are less high empathy than whites or jew aspies.
When you look at how the jews invented xianity and it only took off in europe, u can see that whites chose pacifism. Xianity may have solodified it via frost culture gene co evolution theory but the whites adopted turn the other cheeck very early. Not the jews or arabs or turks.
I have no idea.
Ive long harbored the suspicion that our history books are massively doctored and we have no idea what jews got up to. My guess is that many pogroms or banishments were caused by jewish psychopathic predatory acts. Likewise we have no idea of when white acts of kindness started. I suggest the slavery narrative since the 60s mscled out the enlightened race one and its good acts.
If you cant be sure of history you are flying blind.
The most evil race of man obscures history because there is no better way to pass judgement than to see a criminal record. Problem is that the jews are so voracious in criminality the track record is ongoing .
Jimmy, do you get a sense that guys like ken griffin and other high level hedgies would be aware of zion?
I’m pretty certain Robert Mercer would be. Trump’s major hedgie backer.
“Jimmy, do you get a sense that guys like ken griffin and other high level hedgies would be aware of zion? ”
No doubt about it
I don’t think he cares about israel but you can just feel the resentment he has for jewish privilege on wall street.
Based on my experience i find that most people take the red pill after they experience jewish privilege.
once that happens they start to see everything.
What do you mean jew privilage?
No, most rich people are too busy doing stuff to worry about Jews all day long like some creepy, mental nutcase.
Most jee awsre profession must be the fbi or sec/financial regulators.
https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2010/sep/08/charitable-giving-country
There is no obvious race empathy pattern except big asian countries (china , india and russia) being the leas generous. But why is Laos at the top and Vietnam at the bottom ?
red haired people (irish australian and new zealand) seems to be the most generous.
There is also a caveat. Stats are self declared and subjective. All people i know that have been in switzerland say they are the most selfish people on earth after israelian. I think a swiss who given 10 cents to a gypsie beggar because he was scared and delate him to the police would count himself as having given money, time and helped a stranger and a charity 🙂
Ew, France ranks below Haiti, Nigeria and Syria on the charity ranking… I’m just ashamed.
Interestingly:
Morocco, 33rd
Israel, 36th
Haiti, 39th
My household makes sense lol.
maybe france is a case where the unfortunates are so well taken care of by the state that the rich don’t feel the same need for charity.
in the last 40 years all developed countries have become more unequal, except one. france. but it was starting from a pretty high level of inequality.
Well, Scandinavian countries have even better welfare states and inequality is lower there than in France.
I still think France ranks very high when it comes to international charity. It’s true that we tend to think that real destitution doesn’t exist in France and that donations and volunteering are more needed overseas.
Also, secularism reduces the role of the Catholic Church in domestic assistance and companies only get tax breaks if they give to a small number of charities that are designated by law. So all that might explain this pitiful 91st rank. I’ll need to know the methodology to know how the hell we can look so selfish in this ranking.
the abject failure of anglo-saxon economics.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:bZQ2A_jiV5gJ:inequalitybriefing.org/graphics/briefing_43_UK_regions_poorest_North_Europe.pdf+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
the uk also has the highest trade deficit to gdp of any developed country.
but at least they allow people to deny the holocaust.
Countries that disallow questioing the Holocaust are strictly under Zion’s yoke. One of the countries is Germany whom you seem to bizarely think runs the world.
Countries where holocaust denial is a crime
LMAO, philibuster is so retarded.
1. i never said germany runs the world and i never thought it.
2. i have said there is no la cosa nostra from denmark which rules the world.
3. i have said the EU is the fourth reich. talk about brainwashing. most euros still want in the EU and most also want no muslim immigration. so it’s only the euro elite which has been brainwashed by denmark not the people. whereas germany has brainwashed the people and the elite.
4. it’s EGI playing itself out. and this time germany wins. you might object, “if germany really wanted to win they’d support fiscal and political union.” aha. this is the genius of peoples acting without conspiracy for their own ends. first germany punishes all who would throw off its yoke. it buys the rest of europe. fiscal union if and only if popular and elite support for the EU slips.
5. what will denmark do when it sinks the US? it’s already taking on water. will they move to germany? if not they’re screwed just like all parasites. they eventually kill their host. they survive only so long as they have a living host.
6. if the EU succeeds and expands all the way to kazakhstan and turkey this is very bad for denmark.
7. unlike you i can recognize that the behavior of a people can have a logic without any conspiracy.
8. a martian observing earth would see that the EU is the third iteration of german imperialism. if it succeeds, germany wins finally. and its victory will last for a 1,000 years. when the US lies on the bottom of the ocean, europe will still float.
1. i never said germany runs the world and i never thought it.
But you did refer to Angela Merkel as the leader of the free world, though you were likely exaggerating.
9. and germany has an ace in the hole.
fiscal union = victory.
10. but before the ultimate victory, germany wants to consolidate its grip on the other member states. this is not a conspiracy, but it is what is happening in fact as a result of german chauvinism, german economic superiority.
think about it pill. germany conquers the rest of europe by force vs germany conquers the rest of europe by effectively controlling the money supply of all other member states. it’s very danish of them.
for marx history was the history of technology.
for the national socialists history was the history of peoples.
peoples have personalities. they are actors in the geo-political drama.
an ant is stupid. an ant colony is smart.
Israeli charity is political donations. I’m not kidding. Most jewish charities are for political causes and things, not the poor or disabled etc.
Yeah, and most white Americans give to confederate associations.
Im not joking when i say afros sense of reality is retarded. Not at all!
Yeah, you’re not joking, that’s the issue…
The Gayssot Act or Gayssot Law (French: Loi Gayssot), enacted on 13 July 1990, makes it an offense in France to question the existence or size of the category of crimes against humanity as defined in the London Charter of 1945, on the basis of which Nazi leaders were convicted by the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg in 1945-46 (art.9)…Its first article states that “any discrimination founded on membership or non-membership of an ethnic group, a nation, a race or a religion is prohibited.” The law also requires the Commission nationale consultative des droits de l’homme (National Consultative Commission on Human Rights), created in 1947, to publish an annual report on relations between ethnicities in France.
what is weirdest about this law?
that it was passed 45 years after the end of WW II.
but perhaps its latter part was its motivation and its first part an appendix.
https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Holocaust&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=0&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2CHolocaust%3B%2Cc0
https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Treblinka&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=0&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2CTreblinka%3B%2Cc0
https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Auschwitz&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=0&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2CAuschwitz%3B%2Cc0
https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Dachau&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=0&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2CDachau%3B%2Cc0
https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Bergen+Belsen&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=0&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2CBergen%20Belsen%3B%2Cc0
nothing explains the above ngrams except the increasing influence of denmark in mass media of all kinds.
notice the name starts with “Gay”.
Rothschild freres are as powerful in france as their cousins in tye uk. Hence macron.
i think afro’s and bill cosby’s sexuality is the same. they’d actually prefer she be unconscious while they do it.
Unfortunately, I do it so well I would wake a brain dead up.
i myself have a tiny little arm growing out of my penis. so i can wiggle her lady penis as i go in and out. do you have one of those too?
afro’s girlfriend: afro you’re fantastic.
afro: talk dirt to me.
afro’s girlfriend: …something dirty in french…
afro: no in portuguese with a man’s voice.
How can the braindwad wake up the braindead. So youre some sort of reverse zombie?
I have a Haitian voodoo doll in my pants, you losers can’t compete.
You mean aids?
No I mean something you’ll understand when you grow up.
Aids?
Yes, philibuster, AIDS, or anything you like.
By the way, tell us the name of your psychiatric disorder so that we can make fun of someone’s actual condition.
10/10 retarded video. Anime should post a video – ‘why aspergers people have got it all figured out if only people would just listen and follow Master’s instructions and apologise aily for the legacy of colonialism’.
animekitty has got to be one of the most mentally retarded people i have ever witnessed
This level of subservience to a people who are not even part of your gene pool is the hallmark of the genetic inferior.
This blog is incredible
we have the uncle tom Gman who goes around the net making excuses for jews because they didn’t call him a nigger
we have the mentally retarded animekitty
and we have the homosexual haitan immigrant who defends apartheid because he is desperate for sephardic booty .
The slogan for this blog should be ” degenerates of the world unite !”
The greatest test of intelligence – as defined as the ability to gather resources (money, status, women, land, collectibles etc) is the Master Servant Test
It tests all types of intelligence – social, verbal, memory, quant, etc.
Can the servant figure out Master’s Illusion?
We all laugh at North Koreans for being so brainwashed. Or those in other nations due to religion, ideology, government censorship. We’re happy to read books or watch movies where a protagonist must fight a conspiracy or work against shadowy forces in a dystopian state.
And they laugh at us, I assure you. Everyone thinks their Illusion is legitimate, based primarily on emotional grounds.
And 99% of people fail. Not so much as knowing or rather, feeling, something is wrong, but knowing the detail of it. Obviously there is no information readily available to work through. So those early conspiracy theorists and sites had to take stabs in the dark leading to humorous results.
But the white brainwashing by a foreign race of man which relies heavily on attacking their softness and niceness is very complex. Because it rests on presenting white ‘authority’ as the enemy and guilt tripping whites based on made up morality.
Its quite ingenious. It is based on a psychological assesment.
For a white person, it requires a higher IQ to work out than the North Korean one or Chinese one or probably working out your religion is a fraud. In my opinion, IQ is not enough. You need an emotional or instinctive drive to ask the questions. And aspergery people, who are selected by Master are precisely selected not to have instinct.
Thats why they can’t dress, can’t dance, can’t feel hate, can’t feel sexual, can’t take risks, can’t think creatively, have no imagination and follow orders like their lives depended on it. They are eunuchs. They are disproportionately gay in fact.
Aspergers = Marxism squared. Marx never conceived the capitalist/plutocrat class would literally use husbandry to select for imps and serfs. Now we know. Fo Sho. Fo Sho.
Afro keeps saying academics don’t prescribe to seeing racial differences.
…..
Afro says black athleticism is genetic.
…..
Thats not affirmed in academia either as such. But its more pc, or should I say kosher because its part of the jewish agenda to eliminate whites for shoving their heads into lockers are gamma males back in high school in the 50s, 60s and so on.
….
So we have 3 contradictions in Afro’s deep fried KFC chicken brain:
1. He believes in genetics when it suits his EGI.
2. He consults academics that agree with his beliefs even if there is no basis for his eugenic beliefs.
3. More than happy to see the positive aspects of HBD for blacks. Less than happy to see others. Castigates others for not being pro black despite blackness ‘only being skin colour’. Why do you feel such affinity for the tribe if its circumstantial? Answer: genetics.
This is called being a woman and not logical.
Afro says black athleticism is genetic.
Some aspects of it are biologically demonstrated, I don’t make up stuff like you do.
So we have 3 contradictions in Afro’s deep fried KFC chicken brain:
Nope, there’s only you and your intellectual disability.
Essentially Afro uses an echo of the jewish sophistry. I.e. Goyim, down tools and roll over. Don’t defend your interests. Roll over. Give money and women to blacks (and more precisely, jews). There is no such thing as race….[Celebrates blackhistory magic negro month/Donates money to Israeli lebensraum world domination project]
Will you stop bitching and be a man someday?
And just to get this straight you dont haunt hbd blogs to prove youre not dumb?
Commenting on here probably is the dumbest thing I do in my life.
Afrosapiens is a successful black lawyer who comments on HBD blogs all day while simultaneously banging out hundreds of women and smoking weed because…
Wait…something doesn’t add up…
Wait…something doesn’t add up…
Yup, it doesn’t add up if things are how you put them.
Successful black lawyer: just a lawyer for the moment, we’ll talk about success in a couple years.
HBD blogs: no, just one fortunately.
Commenting all day: yeah, I get notifications all day, download wordpress app on your phone, you’ll see it makes everything quick and intuitive. I think you get confused by the time difference as well. I live in France in case you forgot.
Banging thousands of women: not currently
Smoking weed: it happens
Now it makes sense.
Look – all races of man hate jews, including blacks by the way, what I say here is only controversial to the jewish establishment media and jew brainwashed liberal arts college students who are ‘woke’ like Deal with Dildos.
Why do they hate jews – jews are gamma males. The most despicable of all types of man in the socio-sexual hierarchy.
Read that. It explains possibly some of the readers of this blog more than likely.
The acid test of gamma is whether you can’t take being wrong or you reflexively lie. Now where gamma melds into a full on frontal lobe deficient jew psycopath I’m unclear. Its a fine line as some consider spychopaths to be sigma/alpha.
Psychosis is another terms Rushton uses to mean neurotic/schizo. Psychosis should not be confused with psycopathic/sociopathic. Psychopaths are calculated, lie easily and don’t care about animals and babies. I think you’ll find schizos tend to like animals, nature even at a spiritual/hyper reality level.
A lot of these technocrats probably couldn’t run a heroin dealing business. So retarded and ugly ant looking because they are eunuchs not geniuses.
this is to the gay man ian smith / mugabe: even mainstream publications agree on the heritability of intelligence http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2017/05/genetics-intelligence.html that they’re putting up articles like these. lmao if you think they’re wrong, not like you can argue why considering this is now mainstream science. also see: charles murray and sam harris podcast.
“Q5. What is your IQ?
About 135”
wait werent a promethean??
No sorry to disapoint you.
I was lucky enough to corresponded with some of them, but was not one myself