Pumpkin Person rating: 9/10
So I was in the very small town of Casselman, Ontario, just East of Ottawa, the other day. Commenter JS might like this town, as the people there all seem to prefer to speak in French, though they know how to speak English for business purposes.
I stopped at a gas station and I noticed the film We need to talk about Kevin on sale for only $5. I first heard of the film when actress Tilda Swinton promoted it on Charlie Rose. Since Rose’s show focuses on intellectual topics, I figured the film might have some depth. Always looking for quality horror and dark dramas to add to my collection, I snatched it up.
The film is about the typical high IQ highly educated liberal career woman named Eva (played by Swinton), who like so many smart women, is not very maternal, going through the struggle of having a baby.
Except in this case the adjustment to motherhood is way harder because the baby is born pure evil. From birth it seems like the baby’s only purpose is to make his mother’s life hell on Earth. For the first few months of life, he does nothing but scream all day long. Then he refuses to talk, causing Eva to have him checked for autism. The East Asian doctor concludes he’s perfectly normal.
Eva soon discovers the child is feigning developmental delays as a way of torturing his mother. He pretends he doesn’t know any numbers, but secretly seems to have a genius IQ and can count to the stratosphere. He pretends he can’t use a toilet, just to force Eva to change his diaper, well past the toddler years. He sprays paint all over a bedroom she spent days decorating.
Yet around his father, and everyone else, he acts like a perfect little angel, thus demonizing Eva as a bad mother who doesn’t love her own son.
Once he becomes a teenager, is evil only hardens, but not even Eva can imagine the utter horror he will release on the town where he lives.
The film really deserved an Oscar, either for the excellent performance of Swinton, as the woman who hates being a mother, or the performances of Ezra Miller, as the teenaged Kevin, or Rock Duer or Jasper Newell who plays Kevin as a child. Newell was an incredibly precocious actor, and I appreciate how much he looks like Duer, who plays him as a toddler, and Miller, who plays him as an adolescent, and how much all three boys look like Swinton who plays the mother. Clearly a lot of care went into the casting and makes the film that much more believable.
Interestingly Miller is half Ashkenazi, half white, but he looks half East Asian, half white. Newell and Duer look similar, though I don’t know what their true background is. Such a high IQ ethnic look makes the character’s genius more believable, as you see a lot of these Eurasian looking kids in classes for the gifted.
Kevin’s high IQ is also revealed through his constant sarcasm (seems common in high IQ boys) and clever dialogue. In a scene where his mother discovers his collection of computer viruses, and asks what’s the point, he smartly replies, as some of you do:
“There is no point. That’s the point”
In a scene where Kevin overhears that his mother doesn’t want custody of him when she divorces his father, the father tries to placate Kevin by saying the discussion was heard out of context.
“How could I not know the context,” Kevin replies. “I AM the context.”
I recommend this film for sophisticated realistic horror fans, who like real character development, and artsy non-linear story telling.
Speaking of baby’s my girlfriend is at 8 weeks.
Interestingly I actually dated a IQ 160 girl once. It didn’t work out because she had too many health problems. There was no way she could have given birth to a healthy baby and subcounciously I picked up on that.
I doubt, other than the fact that lower-IQ people disproportional died in cold winters, that there is much sexual selectivity for High IQs.
I mean, having a big cranial circumference is “hot”, nope.
This is one of those things where HBD goes off the deepend. Videla should discuss this on his blog/essays.
he should
“I doubt, other than the fact that lower-IQ people disproportional died in cold winters, that there is much sexual selectivity for High IQs.”
Ummm what? See Peter Frost on sexual selection. Light hair and skin was sexually selected for.
http://www.unz.com/pfrost/the-puzzle-of-european-hair-eye-and-skin-color-2/
Whoops I misunderstood, William.
Higher IQs can be selected for. Since physical attractiveness is correlated with intelligence, that’s how the selection occurs.
racerealist-
by that do you mean
facial symmetry?
thanks peepee. my take is:
1. head size above a not very high threshold is not more attractive per se, but…
2. the most attractive people do in fact tend to have quite large heads…and thus large faces…but folks like jack ma, who has a tiny face on a huge head, are un-attractive…
http://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/img/editorial/2015/01/23/102363801-462007540.530×298.jpg?v=1422028541
bigger than average?
maybe a little.
Jorge-

This guy, a Nobel Prize Winner in Chemistry, has the top of his head (brain area) that juts outward, I.E. his face is too small for it;
Basically proved Global Warming was real/man made, obviously quite notable and brilliant.
But a heart throb?
He SHOULD be,
but he’s not.
“Global warming”
Ha
no you didn’t get me.
as long as your head isn’t tiny or enormous, for your body, it doesn’t make much difference.
beauty is judged relative to a norm.
the norm is always plain.
but whoever is too far from the norm will be judged ugly.
i recall a white woman visiting some pygmies in the congo. the pygmy women chattered “how will she ever get a husband? she’s so ugly.”
Well how far are the proportions from the mean….tis the point.
Mens looks are not selected for.
Meaning male attractive ness is irrelevant to producing babies.
When a trait is “selected for” it means that no organism can reproduce without it.
Female beauty is “selected for” because an unhealthy old ugly woman is not capable of producing healthy offspring. Therefor women HAVE to be good looking to reproduce. Hence the selection.
Males on the other hand do not NEED to be healthy or look good AT ALL to have babies. Therefore male beauty is not selected for. If you or anyone you know is a handsome male its because of random probability.its just chance. Basically its not going to help him get laid and by extension produce offspring.
Ultimately this means that if a handsome man has children its not because of his looks its because of his personality.
There are studies to back this up and I will post them soon
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20369377
This study shows that deeper voiced men have more sex. (Not because women are more attracted to deeper voiced men but because deeper voiced men have a more masculine personality profile)
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/07/22/study-dominance-not-looks-predicts-mens-mating-success/
Basically deeper voiced men get laid more because they try harder not because women like them. (hint: deep voiced men generaly have higher than avg testosterone)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912001420
This is yet another study showing the uselessness of looking good towards a mans efforts to get laid/reproduce
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/3279653/Attractive-fathers-do-not-pass-their-looks-on-to-sons.html
Here’s another study. Basically its saying that handsome men in general dont pass on their looks to their sons.
What the article doesn’t explain is why????. 2 words Cuckholdry…cheating
Handsome men (in general) do not pass on their good looks because they are being cuckholded by their wives/girlfriends and or cheated on just as much as avg or even ugly looking guys are.These mate stealing males simply have a more bad boy or masculine
personality than they do.
Ultimately if your a handsome man and your son does not turn out to look like you it doesn’t matter what anyone says. The kid is not your son!
Poor Jewish women
What is the planet where you live??
Most women and men are not like Hollywood actors and they tend to produce healthy babies.
Santoculto- I doubt you’ve even seen a Jew or Jewess.
Didn’t your mother tell you, you can’t believe everything you see on the internet?
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTfIsYbbcjsBHGV435w6L2Hy3Suq8eJrEl0nRK0rp7cWGrA0Q5g
The stereotypical (read: Ethnically pure) Jews are overwhelming armenoid, read: Ugly. 50% of Jews (American Jews?) don’t look exactly as the stereotype but it still doesn’t mean that many them will look less ugly or with some physiological defect such as many do.
Is you Bill?? Or is another Will??
@William
Yea, facial symmetry. Check this study out.
People tend to find their own face when morphed into the opposite sex most attractive, even when he/she doesn’t know it’s his own face, strongly suggesting that people typically prefer those who look like themselves, in other words their own racial/ethnic group. The more genes that people share in common, the more likely they are to look for similar characteristics in their partners.
@Mikey Blaze
Great links, thanks.
To add to it, men with higher testosterone leave their children while men with less stay.
The study was done on two African populations, so I’m not sure about the carryover (I doubt there is, but I wouldn’t doubt that it holds true for all groups).
http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/276/1655/347
Also, what you’re saying is half true. Eurasian men weren’t selected for physical attractiveness, but IQ. Which is the reverse in Africa:
“Thus, the balance between male selection and female selection shifts according to how much of the food and other resources each sex provides. In Africa, the women, even today, farm and gather food, so they have more selection power, but in the colder climates more of the food was meat, especially in the winter, and hunting was done by men, shifting some selection power to men. (Miller, 1994a). As a result of selection by men, Eurasian women have become more beautiful and, as a result of selection by women, Eurasian men have become workaholics and slightly more intelligent than Eurasian women (more intelligence = a better provider in Eurasia). African women have become slightly more intelligent than African men, however, who have become the more physically attractive sex.”
http://erectuswalksamongst.us/Chap5
I highly recommend this book. It’s basically a great supplement to Race, Evolution, and Behavior by Rushton.
Race realist I understand where your coming from. Although I disagree with your logic. Only 1 sex “chooses” the traits of the other. Men and women do not choose each other (as main stream media suggests) there’s overwhelming evidence that human mating is based on male vs male competition. Even Darwin believed that in humans the males choose the females
I agree that eurasion women were selected to be more beutiful By men
But I disagree with your hypothesis on African males.
you’re making testosterone do way too much work.
all male genitalia has a female counterpart.
and vice versa.
except men do not have any anatomical analog of a uterus, and women have no analog of a prostate…unless it’s the mythical g-spot.
read shaw’s Man and Superman.
hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
in general people are matched for:
1. socio-economic class
2. intelligence level
3. physical attractiveness
fat ugly old rich men with supermodels is the exception that proves the rule.
Sorry mikey, you’re wrong, male and females select for each other. male vs male competition is the norm but not the rule in the animal kingdom.
dr no was another euasian evil genius:
I need to stop talking about Canada, and how bad the USA fares, in comparison. This topic has been beaten to death.
But here is the real reason why the USA sucks:
Bad Jewish food tastes a whole lot better in Quebec, than it does in NYC, where the majority of Askhenazim reside.
Then we have Cocaine Cola, laden with fake chemicals that goes with such food.
Canada has Cott’s Cola, which is all natural.
This sums up everything up why the USA sucks!
Drink Mexican coke if you’re going to drink it at all. They use cane sugar instead of HFCS.
good on ya.
and the only reason is corn subsidies and can sugar tariffs. cane sugar is dirt cheap. it’s so cheap the brazilians have made ethanol an affordable substitute for gasoline.
but what we really need to talk about is peepee.
it’s funny that the only reason such anti-market government intervention is necessary is precisely because of the free market ideology.
that is, corn farmers go out of business or the whole american sugar industry can’t compete and “we can’t have this” because jobs…because everyone must have a job.
much better would be a much more lavish social safety net.
but genuine free trade can only be “efficient” if there is also global open borders. but even given this logical necessity, open borders would be very in-efficient.
the whole neo-liberal, academic economics jive talk is shown to be what it is, vacuous.
but consistency is not the forte of the ruling elite.
Cott’s Cola has the sugar ingredients labeled as glucose-fructose. To some, it’s the same as HFCS. But some Canadians do not agree, because the food administration in Canada has stricter standards when it comes labeling.
Anyway, when I drink Cott’s, it has a similar taste to the more expensive cane sugar soda that one has to pay a premium in the states.
i only drink cola when it’s mixed with rum, sometimes tequila.
it costs a little more, but not more than 2x as much.
it’s worth it.
buy “mexi-coke” if it’s available.
also, buy KO…the KO people really still use an extract from the coca leaf…no kidding…it just has an unmeasurable amount of cocaine.
i actually had cocaine once…it was the local anesthetic used in my septoplasty…not rhinoplasty…my nose still sucks to breathe with…but it never looked bad…and the surgery actually made it slightly uglier.
Coca-Cola includes as an ingredient a coca leaf extract prepared by a Stepan Company plant in Maywood, New Jersey.[2] The facility, which had been known as the Maywood Chemical Works, was purchased by Stepan in 1959.[3] The plant is the only commercial entity in the USA authorized by the Drug Enforcement Administration to import coca leaves, which come primarily from Peru. Approximately 100 metric tons of dried coca leaf are imported each year. The cocaine-free leaves are sold to The Coca Cola Company, while the cocaine is sold to Mallinckrodt, a pharmaceutical firm, for medicinal purposes.
Auto-biography*
Sociobiology’s become the only medium for telling truths about humans.
My favourite character in Wilson’s The Insect Societies is Monomorium santschii. This species, over evolutionary time, has lost its worker caste altogether. The host workers do everything for their parasites, even the most terrible task of all. At the behest of the invading parasite queen, they actually perform the deed of murdering their own mother. The usurper doesn’t need to use her jaws. She uses mind-control. How she does it is a mystery; she probably employs a chemical, for ant nervous systems-are generally highly attuned to them.
If her weapon is indeed chemical, then it is as insidious a drug as any known to science. For think what it accomplishes. It floods the brain of the worker ant, grabs the reins of her muscles, woos her from deeply ingrained duties and turns her against her own mother. For ants, matricide is an act of special genetic madness and formidable indeed must be the drug that drives them to it. In the world of the extended phenotype, ask not how an animal’s behaviour benefits its genes; ask instead whose genes it is benefiting.
Richard Dawkins, quoting Edward Wilson
“Sociobiology’s become the only medium for telling truths about humans.”
So damn true. Though it’s called evolutionary psychology now.
E. O. Wilson said this in his book Sociobiology a new synthesis.
Philosophy doesn’t tell us about human nature; evolutionary psychology does.
Because philosophy has been ill understood since its early period of existence. Sociobiology or evolutionary psychology seems very recent science, so don’t take all credit of philosophy that is much more older and already make great insights not about human behavior since immemorial times.
…not JUST about…
touching on peepee’s ne asian supremacism…
recently kevin rudd in a moment of great candor told charlie rose that…
Xi Jinping’s ultimate goals are:
1. to make the PRC a developed country.
2. to maintain the control of the communist party and to prove fukuyama wrong.
it’s hard to believe for americans who soak in capitalist propaganda all day long, but…
1. Xi IS a communist.
IS a communist.
2. the PRC’s economy is still much more state controlled than ANY developed country’s. still about 50% of the labor force is employed by the government.
3. as the jewish commie richard wolff has pointed out, quite correctly,…
the fastest growing economies ever were those of the USSR from the end of the civil war to the beginning of WW II and the PRC from Deng Xiaoping to now.
…
if Xi succeeds the ne asians, and the chinese in particular WILL make a laughing stock of the west…
and of singapore and hong kong.
even though singapore is already one of the most “dirigisme” states.
East Asians are pushy yet obedient strivers. Their passive agressive irony has show forth. They were never made to be great!
Furthermore, Japan see itself as unique. It’s not NE Asia, but Japan. The rest of NE Asia, is a dirty rice pit.
the japs are “lost aryans” and “honorary whites”.
The Japanese are by far the more talented of the East Asians. Talent trumps money. The Chinese are proles, and so are the Koreans, and the rest of the slant gang. They think money 1st.
The other day I was watching a documentary on political propaganda in Japan, ”how to make a candidate”. One of the differentiating features between east asians and Caucasians is the nose. Generally larger and thinner noses (nose bridge) are found in Caucasians. In this documentary I saw a lot of Japanese with these characteristics. Japanese look more ‘yellow-off’ ‘(Ainu-esque *) or clean than the continental East Asians, my not-so humble opinion.
There is another theory: The Japanese were able to retained the original form of the Mongoloid (looks more Caucasian) more successfully, which evolved out of the Caucasians in Eurasia (in today’s Central Asian region). It happened by accident and not only because of Ainu. Some North Chinese, I believed have this look. Also some Mongol/Manchu/Korean members, have this feature too.
Some crazy theories suggest East Asians are not a race, but a group with various levels of Caucasoid and Australoid.
Japan is analogous to the Britain because their insularity condition and better& natural geographic isolation. British are much more pale and red haired than most of northern European and seems are more purely Caucasian even than Nordic who seems have a lot of mongoloid elements there.
Most of European on general.
In temperament seems British look little different than their northern European counterparts ( or not).
British people suck tho..!
East Asians have less muscle mass than Caucasians and Africans. Robert Lindsay thinks Whites are partly derived from blacks. East Asians are partly derived from Australoids, who originally come from blacks in Africa. Australoids are a weaker, softer version of black africans.
According to bloggers like Robert Lindsay, the Ainu phenotype is what the early Mongoloids look like. So they look more Caucasian than East Asian. He also thinks Caucasians are partly derive from early Mongoloid, not the other way around. To me, East Asians look like a mixture of Caucasoid and Australoid, with Australoid being dominant. The attractive East Asians conform to the White phenotypes, who are the small minority.
Superior Spain look very different than their southern cousins, Italy and Greece… and very similar with Northern european-proles about en masse immigration.
True, Spaniards are not as prolish as Italians or Greeks. Greeks are the least cosmopolitan of the Southern Euros. Being cosmopolitan is the opposite of prole.
The only reason Spaniards being a Southern Euro people, who likes immigration, is perhaps due to the success of the Spanish integration of non-Spaniards. And Spain has dealth with foreigners in the past. So many different kinds, from Jews, Muslims, Gypsies and Berbers from the Canary Islands known as Guanches, basically Spaniards in their primitive mode.
Here the Spaniards trying to convert Gypsies into Catholics:
The Anglo Proles are morons, when it comes to multicultural subjects. They don’t know what to do with their colonial subjects.
Remember Machiavelli: Man is to be loved or destroyed. No middle ground. Machiavelli admired the Spanish.
Also, Spain has immigrants from Latin America, usually not black, also North African types, so many blacks. Spain has very few black immigrants.
* so not many blacks in Spain.
Also Santo, you are correct, ANglo domains are completely sociopathic in nature, because money is the only essence that defines them. Therefore, there is no collective or cultural entity, only individuals competing for power, status and wealth.
What I have read about the temperamental differences between Italian, Greek and Portuguese, Spaniards. And my impressions.
First, Italians and Greeks tend to be very extroverted, child behavior, especially toward lower latitudes.
The Portuguese tend to be less’ behavior guido ” type, more polished, but also more cold, melancholic, like many northern Europeans.
As for the Spaniards are mixed impressions. Some say they tend to be similar to the Portuguese and therefore less’ behavior guido ” type, extroverted, narcissistic, social-leaning. But they are also more rude, gross, that is, they often say things without thinking if this will hurt the feelings of others. A certain coldness, an inter-personal brutality, but at very low levels that couldn’t compromise the very basic social environment, as happens with many westernized black populations (or not).
Others say that Spaniards and Italians are on average indistinguishable.
JS,
what are the differences in temperament that you recognized between Italians and Spaniards ** If we can call them that, in a generalized way.
There are 2 types of Spaniards. One very sophisticated, polite and cosmopolitan and the other, narrow minded and rude. Spain joining the modern world, there are more cosmopolitan ones. Both somewhat detached. But Spaniards are Southern Euros, so they have this feeling of warmth and friendliness on a good day. Italians have less diversity in their behavior. I say Italians are median, where Greeks are the most parochial or prole. Spaniards and Greeks are both loud compared to Italians, because their languages are in hard aspects. Castilian Spanish sounds like Greek to those who do not know the difference. By far, Spaniards are the most cosmopolitan, then come Italians, then Greeks. So this means Spaniards are the most engaging to foreign stimuli of the Southern Euros.
Also, Spaniards are die hard individualists compared to other Southern Euros, but in a different way from Anglo Proles. Spaniards are very individualistic and Anglo Proles are egotistical, so to speak!
Of course what I said reflects the gdp/economy of these countries and how well traveled are these groups. Spaniards are very well traveled. I met Spaniards in the least expected place like a cafe full of stupid White Americans. They were not even drinking anything, just talking among themselves about how strange America is.
Also, besides being individualistic, Spaniards want to be seen as unique from the rest of Europe, almost like a superiority complex. Opposite of Greeks, who think they are like the Germans or French, but they are not. They are closer to Turks in culture. So much for their self hate and inferiority complex. Greeks always think themselves as being aligned with Europe, but Western Europeans think Greeks are distant cousins, which of course is true. Greece is over there where Turkey and Israel are located. Italians again, are in the middle range of all of this.
Anglo Proles also think they are unique, but England is inferior in every way you can imagine compared to Spain. Nothing good comes out of them, just more problems for the world.
Huuuum, even i had liked your explanation and agree partially you seems very biased about your people and about anglo-pro.. anglos, so…
I believe that the Spaniards are destined to be another European power once again, in a different way from the past. More in cultural aspects, and the success of integration and their world cosmopolitanism.
Anglo Prole nations only focus on capitalism from cheap labor and cheap products. Also, cheap and stupid people!
What you call ”success” i call ” faillure”, and i’m right…
Spain create problems to itself colonizing and mixing your blood indiscriminately from Rio Grande (american west was sparsely populated) even in distant Phillipines…
i don’t think they knew something about eugenics to implement this massified miscigenation program…
The Chinese aren’t ideology bound so, unlike germans, they don’t go around fucking their economy in the name of racial supremacy while killing their brightest Jews instead of using them for the war effort. The Chinese joyride pax Americana by letting the stupid American military act big and have a “save the world” complex.
Comparing the stupid soviets to the bright Chinese during grain collectivism show how much more resourceful the Chinese are. The naive savage Soviets followed Stalin to the letter while the Chinese knew Mao was an idiot and played the system. Until the 90s, the Japanese manufacturing made fools out of every single creative white company.
I’m reading a book on Chinese History/revolution Pu Yi’s first day- to Mao’s first day.
It says, that, despite WN nonsensical rhetoric here, the Chinese are not really racialist, when portions were colonized by Britain, France, and Portugal (and later Japan), they learned how it was to be the n!ggers. Now, do they believe in HBD?
Maybe more than Whites. But there is a difference between that and Jared Gaylor.
This is a mainstream distortion about really happened in Germany since the XIX.
And again
“kill the brightest of the Jews”
This part pass the idea that without the precious Jews Germany couldn’t survive, a possible lie. Germany has produced a greater proportion of great gentile geniuses, its people has been known as one of the smartest of the Europe since a long time.
Again the retarded theory that “European envy against Jew”.
I’m not a hitlerist who think he was impeccable in their Kampf, seems obvious that not. But most part of the time rightist revolutions don’t happen without a cause, a reason. In the same way Brazilian dictatorship don’t happened without a reason, because it was a reaction against the increasing of communist activities in Brazilian ground.
Why comunists like to call their enemies as reactionary. Because in the true they are reactionaries.
Generally the brightest of Jews don’t have any loyalty for gentile government just to the international hidden state of Jewry.
No hDD
Just intelligence is not enough
Jews can be the brightest of all peoples. But without character, the qualitative psychology, they on avg or disproportionate, will be at the best useless and at the worst, problematic, as really happen.
@JS
“Some crazy theories suggest East Asians are not a race, but a group with various levels of Caucasoid and Australoid.”
Lol this is retarded. Where did you hear that?
Europeans and East Asians both have origins in Siberia; the same as the Native Americans.
East Asians aren’t a race; they’re an ethnicity. They’re ‘Asian’ as in from the Asian subcontinent.
Many people believe that East Asians themselves are a race, but they aren’t. I correct a lot of people on this.
“Why are they classifying Pakistanis as Asian in Britain!!”
Because they ARE Asian. Asians aren’t only yellow people with slanted eyes. People don’t get that.
”Lol this is retarded. Where did you hear that?
Europeans and East Asians both have origins in Siberia; the same as the Native Americans.”
Evidence*
”East Asians aren’t a race; they’re an ethnicity. They’re ‘Asian’ as in from the Asian subcontinent.”
I thought east asian were equivalent to the caucasian or east asian = mongoloid and european = caucasoid
”Many people believe that East Asians themselves are a race, but they aren’t. I correct a lot of people on this.”
they are both, a regional subrace or ethnicity and a race or part of the major mongoloid race if not their purest form such as happen with northern europeans to the caucasian race.
best book by a ne asian who’s still alive…
What was Gavin Long’s IQ?
His Amazon author page: http://www.amazon.com/Cosmo-Setepenra/e/B016QV5AQK/
Twitter (will probably be taken down soon): https://twitter.com/ConvosWithCosmo/
Short bio: http://heavy.com/news/2016/07/gavin-long-kansas-city-missouri-baton-rouge-police-officers-ambush-shot-shooting-shooter-gunman-suspect-name-identified-age-photos/
He was Black, a Black nationalist, a conspiracy theorist, and a college dropout from a bad college. OTOH his prose seems to be more or less fluent.
He got into the military so he must be at least IQ 80 (U.S. norms), they screen out the bottom 10%.
He might make an interesting case study
Steven sailor wrote “The average for enlistees (male and female) in 1998 across all services would be about 107 for white enlistees, 102 for blacks, and 103 for Hispanics. (That shows the impressive patriotism of minorities who possess more options in life than the average. A little known fact is that the average black enlistee comes from a home with an income above the national average for blacks.)”
The military recruits from the brightest sixth of African Americans. Both police killers were army recruits and resemble right wing terrorists in their meticulous plans.
That was in 1998 when they were a lot more selective. Since the Iraq and Afghanistan wars they’ve no longer had the luxury of excluding those below IQ 95
Race Realist’s take that Southern Italians are not much different from Northerners, is true. It could be that Sicilians are more distant from mainland Italians, but Neapolitans are often indistinguishable from the cultural snobs up north.
And Southern Italians who are educated are not prole, with American standards, wealthy New Yorkers are low class proles, not the bourgeois.
Spaniards are the real oddballs among the Southern Euros. Some look like their Anglo Prole enemies, while others blend well, with the people they fought centuries ago, and now exiled in North Africa.
Northern Spaniard, Francisco Franco could have been a Moroccan.
He did use them to crush the Republicans once and for all!
There is a bigger difference between North and South and wast and west Germans.
My whole family in America is in corrections or they are lawyers. People knock on South Italy, but American southern Italians do very well.
Not to mention the most beautiful women in the world.
Phenotypes of Southern Mainland Italians aren’t significant different from those of the North.
In terms of intelligence, most non-prestigious careers in America such as law enforcement, requires a high 90s minimum IQ, and small law, 12o minimum IQ.
The intelligence levels between the Northern and Southern parts of any Euro nation, have to do with cosmopolitanism. Southern regions are generally less cosmopolitan, and thus functional people do not require higher levels of IQ to respond to such diverse stimuli.
You’re correct about the women. Some of NYC’s prettiest women are of Southern Italian ancestry, despite having the reputation of being proles.
Your family may mean nothing about the average (~ 50%) of the population they are derived. Difficult to understand it??
My family do “very well” in cognitive aspects. And???
Santo- The Amerinds were not small savages. The Spaniards actually allied with neighboring groups to defeat the Aztecs…they automatically thought of building alliances. Although Nordics have a near monopoly on Physics/Chemistry Nobel prizes, Meds do well in medicine,etc. Which as Videla points out is more practical/relevant. Southern Euros may not have contributed as much (but did near as much) but simply treat their people better and have handled recent political challenges better. And in old history they and Muslims have done more.
William you are right on the money.
There were many battles where the Aztecs beat the Spanish. Without the help of neighboring tribes that the Aztecs “oppressed”, the Spaniards would not have been able to beat the Aztecs.
Correct about Meds and Arabs. I’ve actually seen people say that the Muslim Golden Age is bullshit.
That’s just showing a retarded bias.
I’m biased a bit, I won’t lie, but everyone is. I still can look at things rationally though.
Funny point here. With the thread here about Jews and whites birth rates, I’ve argued what you argued.
I just love arguing with people. It’s fun and I always learn something new.
But I do agree with you fully that a low Eurasian birthrate is genetic. JUST, the Jews are using that biology to make it lower.
Santo- The Amerinds were not small savages. The Spaniards actually allied with neighboring groups to defeat the Aztecs…they automatically thought of building alliances. Although Nordics have a near monopoly on Physics/Chemistry Nobel prizes, Meds do well in medicine,etc. Which as Videla points out is more practical/relevant. Southern Euros may not have contributed as much (but did near as much) but simply treat their people better and have handled recent political chaallenges better. And in old history they and Muslims have done more.
Catholicism may make spaniards and portugueses treated ”better” specially–fundamentally the amerindians because the iberian priests and Vaticano look for new world autoctonous peoples as the opportunity to expand the universalistic catholic church among them…. and…. they did
but about enslaved african subsaharians the catholic church was diametrically different.
Where physics and chemistry are relevant*
To William,
correcting
”where physics and chemistry are NOT relevant* ”
it can be less practical, specially by now, but i think is complex to conclude just by this/one perspective.
To the RacialRealist
”I’m biased a bit, I won’t lie, but everyone is. I still can look at things rationally though.”
‘But everyone is…’
justify your/this mistakes seems worst thing to do.
yes such as happen with almost people, you (and me) can see things in a ratio-nal way, specially when this things are not related to your own ego, so you can see at ‘scientific” way, at distant/impersonal approach, but sometimes is needed to see ALSO via ego-centric perspective, to complete our understanding.
Instinct is self-confidence, identity…
most distant from the instinct less self-confident about your own identity you really are…
this may explain why so many cognitively smart people make dumb choices in politics, fundamentally that choices that have instinctive imperativeness.
and the free will look also excessive because to the human or nonhuman being have access to the free will, he/she/it need no have a pre-existent identity/biology.
but for what**
why recreate your own identity many times you want if in the end the most important is not to do it.
i look to the wise such as human being who is in the middle of this spectrum (optimum or in ”habitable zone”) , between instinctive (leave voters) and less instinctive (remain voters, 😉 )
you need both
to know who you are (instinct)
and
to doubt about yourself/your thoughts ( reflexive approach)
people on the right are traditionally self-confident
people on the left are weirdly ”self-confident”
people on the left tend to understand themselves in a low-self esteem-centric approach…
I read some interesting articles about glial cell to neuron ratio positive correlation with intelligence from starfish to Albert Einstein. Most interestingly, glial cancer and education correlate.
Injecting rats with human glial cells boosts rat intelligence. I guess that’s why intelligence and head size don’t strongly correlate. Albert Einstein had an underaverage brain size but 70 percent more glial cells than brains belonging to an educated control group.
I believe iq and glial cells have a direct correlation.
interesting, but is it really ratio that counts, as opposed to raw number? If it’s the case that’s it’s raw number brainsize would help that, but otherwise, no.
[blockquote]http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2291291/
We delineated the hippocampus and amygdala in high-resolution magnetic resonance images of the brain from 34 healthy individuals. We then correlated FSIQ with overall volumes and with the surface morphologies of each of these structures. Hippocampus volumes correlated significantly and inversely with FSIQ independently of gender, age, socioeconomic status, and whole brain volume. Left and right hippocampus volumes correlated respectively with verbal and performance IQ subscales.[/blockquote]
My verbal is 132 and my performance is 86. By the article my left and right hippocampus should not be symmetrical in volume. My FSIQ would be determined by both my left and right brain added together. The less efficient side bringing down FSIQ. I still do not understand why my (g) is 130.
Anime kitty your autism is lowering your IQ. By how much I can’t be sure. Your still more intelligent than me tho.
france has the largest jewish population in europe.
what % of france’s richest are jews?
of 39 listed only 3 i could identify, and two were relatives and heirs, the wertheimers.
given his name, Charles Edelstenne may also be a jew.
so 36% of the forbes 400, but at most 10.3% of france’s richest.
hmmm.
norms of reaction strikes again.
the 39 richest frogs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_French_people_by_net_worth
sephardic.
although…………….I do believe norms of reaction are pushed aside because it’s not politically expedient-
I.E. “Blacks are dumb everywhere, they can NEVER thrive”…….
no one can talk against that, except some uber liberal anti-racist like pp.
It is not given enough credence, but your example probably doesn’t hold water.
one of them is sephardic.
“no one can talk against that, except some uber liberal anti-racist like pp.”
You think PP would argue that?
Race Realist-
No, but the point is he could if you wanted to. No one here is that much of cultural-rightists, as far as I can see, except perhaps you, but you can hear things out, don’t have crippling cognitive dissonance.
If Jayman did it, people would be pissed off, just judging on the type of people that seem to frequent him.
he could if he wanted to.
Gayjam play with ignorance and lack of critical thinking of people to its own self-promotion…
he says
”i’m liberal, i’m a mixed race guy who married a white woman”
Seems very confortable for him or for anyone in its situation declare itself such as ”liberal cosmopolitan citizen”…
and to a mixed race person is just normal marry out of your ”mixed race” group.
yes, he’s also a jamaican immigrant
so, he’s ”liberal”
because he have immigrant background
is a mixed race person
marry a white woman
and he is against WN because this hurt/affect him directly by obvious reasons
but your ideological positions are overwhelmingly conservative, if not just conservative but fervent at point to make extremist and seems precipitated conclusions about many pertinent subjects such as homossexuality, genetics & environment mutual influences, marriage type main theory to explain behavior [ and geopolitics] ( moslems born that way and not = ”there is a certain little nation causing or increasing this behavioral vulnerabilities among moslems)…
hbd chick never talked about the geopolitics, read, REAL geopolitics in/of the middle east as a important factor to explain the current situation of this region, seems obvious to me that she’s inconscious or consciously manufacturing the idea of spontaneity of the current geopolitics in middle east, i mean, ”cousin marriage pattern CAUSE DIRECTLY the current wars in this region…”
”Lebanon civil war was caused fundamentally by cousin marriage patterns in this country”
Supposedly we don’t know what provoked the two world wars in Europe in XX century, cousin marriage*
not…
We also don’t know why europeans change so much in the little period of the time.
today, supposedly ””they”” ”are” ”’pathological altruists””…
in the very near past,
two monstruous wars had started in Europe, the land free of cousin marriage plague and with ”inherited” ”pathological altruism”…
interestingly he accuse or call others such as ”homo-phobic”, but your ridiculous insistence, as if he had hurriedly about it, about pathogenic theory of homossexuality, read: ”exclusive” and masculine, make him equally ”homo-phobic”…
or he don’t take note about your own incongruencies or he’s just other stupid with a megaphone, seems very prolific type.
HBD chick talks about “Arab inbreeding” with little evidence that it has a major effect (i.e. even having both parents being siblings creates a 50% overlap, which actually is not a major IQ gap, because in terms of IQ, someone with a 100 IQ is “5x” smarter than one with a 90 IQ, so it doesn’t make a difference, just nonsense.
Jayman occasionally has something good. I honestly don’t like her very much, however.
Yes, i thought cousin marriage, of course, not intense or just not-insane types, tends to correlates with poverty, [ir]religious ignorance, etc…
Poor people in regions such middle east tends to live in highlands and geographical limitation itself forced them to marry inside their families, even if it is not the only reason to ”keep within the family”.
based on hbd chick and other hbds cousin marriage theory explain DIRECTLY the
current conflicts in middle east…
but and the geopolitics of the region **
US / Israel forging all these conflicts **
Arab spring**
Cousin patterns
North Korea**
Cousin patterns
”Jayman occasionally has something good. I honestly don’t like her very much, however.”
He is the Camilla Paglia of the hbd-o-sphere with substantial differences
both say truisms about respectively human behavior and feminism
but both talk it in a very confortable position because Paglia criticized only the surface of the feminism while he just repeat his truims without any important development of their assumptions.
A substantial difference is that Paglia have a big academic background, seems, most people praises her, it must mean something, although immensely dislike of his fixation on ” pop music ”.
William
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2015/12/14/iq-inbreeding-and-clannishness/
IQ drops 2.5 to 10 pounds from close inbreeding.
Santoculto,
Of course the Jew S (US) is forcing the middle eastern conflicts. It clears the land so Israel can expand for their greater Israel plan
http://www.unz.com/article/war-is-realizing-the-israelizing-of-the-world/
Of course biology is the reason WHY Arabs and other inbred Muslim Caucasian populations can be easily manipulated (think the “Boston Bombers” a few years back, who were Chechen).
The Jews use Arab biology to their advantage. They bring people with higher testosterone into Europe, crime increases, people hate Muslims and therefore “understand Israel’s plight with the Palestinians”. Moreover, ISIS was created to overthrow Asaad. Once he’s gone, Israel can expand more.
Notice how ISIS has never attacked Israel? The same with Al CIA-da…. errr AL Qaeda.
=^)
Don’t appears logic to the hdd crowd…
pp- I have an IQ for you to estimate that everyone would get a kick out of(relates to both having a stratospheric head size, stratospheric brain, stratospheric Bank account, and Medicist pride, etc).
Pablo Escobar…………..
Worth $30 billion+ by age 37 (would be the world’s 7th richest today, not sure if inflation adjusted or not).
Came from a poor country (current annual income $12k)
Controlled 80% of the narcotics coming from Latin America to the U.S.
Relatively Big headed;
http://www.forbes.com/pictures/gkkh45fik/1987-2/#7ea0237d16a9
http://www.businessinsider.com/pablo-escobar-named-richest-drug-dealer-of-all-time-2012-10
The average self made billionaire’s IQ is 136?
https://www.mainstreet.com/article/how-to-become-a-billionaire-youve-got-until-your-late-40s
now, the youngest was around 25 when he became a billionaire http://www.forbes.com/pictures/eimh45lhg/no-1-dustin-moskovitz/#2006363376f8, so he’s around -3 SDs in age, and with an average age of 47, say, the SD is 7.14 years. Pablo Escobar was 37, so
(47-37)/7.14= 1.4 SDs above the average Billionaire.
So 136+1.4(15)= 157
however he was a criminal, so deduct 10 points.
157-10= 147
AND that’s assuming he was just a billionaire, not a decabillionaire.
https://scontent-mia1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13700119_951168428339830_8751133033574296280_n.jpg?oh=1a2da526af11ea758355d2b2f5b1f70a&oe=58225AAC
https://in-sightjournal.com/2014/08/08/dr-james-flynn-emeritus-professor-political-studies-and-psychology-university-of-otago-new-zealand-part-two/
What do you think about this interview PP*
I wish that the scientists ones had the same interest in relation to abnormalities of the normal people, and why not, about themselves**
they do not have…
because they think they are perfect
or
all your sins are forgivable …
We learned in the world created by the slave ” white ” and the Jewish vipers, their mental master that
be mediocre is to be mentally healthy
but of course, they do not select a complete human beings, but for complete slaves, and the best of them are those who do not have any pre-consciousness of its incompleteness condition.
They do not want real human beings, want the quality of your teeth …
they who**
To think that most of these proto-robots that populate the organic friendly academic environment definitely has no doubt about the supposed perfections …
The human world is moved by all kinds of megalomaniacs, and that’s why this trash …
Civilization is just a mega-scale obsessive mania for cleanliness and in the end, what does it matter ** Nothing
I once asked my psychologist if she has done some self-analysis and to my surprise I found out that she never did.
One of the first things that the mental health professional should do is a rigorous self-scrutiny, how mentally healthy / wise it is to judge others …
But not.
Most human capacity is to dehumanize.
Holy shit look at that guy on the left immediately jump to help as she falls then moves the torch before it burns her. Fast reaction time.
Iq of this good samaritan** Peepee**
Do you can help us*
Either that or he just expected it to happen
the girl on the right help the woman who crash in the ground in the same time than the man on the left.
iq* (read, aiquiu)
PP brain is bugged…
is it too may links?
marsha, marsha, marsha…
THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD IS…
THE HISTORY OF TECHNE/TECHNOLOGY.
…
THIS WAS MARX’S GREATEST INSIGHT…
OBVIOUS IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT.
Fucking love that movie. I saw it when it came out, I feel so old now.
i guess so.
ahhh…it’s some copyright issue…
and just to show i’m not making it up…
on bill maher tonight, the jewish “ghost writer” of The Art of the Deal said…
there is nothing normal about this election. we have the craziest man who has ever run for president in the history of the united states….
we laugh…
this man is mentally…
at this point michael moore interrupts.
cue to 28:30
…where link to copyrighted material was…
nothing on ronnie o’sullivan’s cuing…
Jorge,
Just another media Jew liberal. Is there any substance behind what he said? Did he give a good reason or a Jew reason (let’s be real here, the Jews back Trump too).
i don’t doubt it.
but i’m not a trump butt boy, i just think he’s better than hillary.
and it’s impossible to be an nyc real estate developer without dealing with lots of jews.
and it is telling that the two other rich folks who spoke in his support were…
1. tom barrack…a lebanese catholic (like carlos slim) who made his fortune serving the saudis.
2. peter thiel…born in germany and a self-identifying christian. he was raised an evangelical.
…
3. jewish neocons hate trump. they know that globalism is good for the jews and nationalism is not.
Some neocons love Trump: milo, LOTB
Trump is a huge critic of the Iran nuclear deal. I hope he’s not dumb enough to get America into a war with Iran.
but if it looks like trump is going to win, i’d reduce my weighting in bonds.
why?
trump has said he “loves leverage”, and he apparently intends to cut taxes yet has lots and lots of new spending proposals.
he will fund this new spending by selling US treasuries which will be monetized by the federal reserve…
and inflation still won’t be a problem…
just as it’s not a problem in japan.
japan has more than 2x the national debt of the US as a % of its economy. the ytm on the JGB 30 year is 1/3d of 1%.
and japan still has no inflation.
trump’s election will mean “helicopter money”.
…
if hillary ever appears to be a sure thing, i’d increase my weighting in bonds.
and why does “helicopter money” not necessarily cause inflation?
because inflation only results when an increase in spending power is not met by an increase in production.
in other words, if production is below capacity “helicopter money” may only bring it back to capacity, and thus…
no inflation.
that is there may be inflation in some things, but the general level of prices will not increase if production currently suppressed by lack of spending power.
here’s trump’s arab-american booster:
https://charlierose.com/videos/28484
btw, “arab” is NOT a race.
Jorge,
I know that Arabs aren’t a race; they are a subset of the Caucasian race, but stupid moron white nationalists don’t get that.
I correct them so much, but they say I’m a cuck and a “Muslim sympathizer”. They’re fucking morons.
it’s not even that…
“arab” is used in many senses.
1. a native arabic speaker…this includes some black africans…like the billionaire mo ibrahim https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mo_Ibrahim…an excellent example of how even black african can get rich via techne…very unlike oprah…ibrahim has a PhD in electrical engineering.
2. a swarthy caucasian from n africa or the levant or the arabian penninsula.
3. turks and iranians hate being referred to as arabs.
Mo Ibrahim is Arab in both a linguistic & genetic sense. He clearly has a lot of caucasoid genes. Partly explains why he’s a billionaire.
PP.
glad to see that you see that Trump is a neocon just like the rest
Jorge,
Well Americans, on average, are stupid so that doesn’t surprise me.
Trump to his credit was not a very enthusiastic supporter of the 2003 Iraq war so he’s not a complete dupe of the neocons
On the other hand, dragging America into a war with Iran is the ultimate neocon fantasy & I hope Trump doesn’t fall for it
PP
Arabs are Caucasoids
I know you know this.They aren’t of “a different race”.
RaceRealist, of course they’re caucasoid, but some like to make racial divisions within the macro-races.
For example, I tentatively divide the Caucasoid macro-race into the 3 races: whites, dark caucasoids & Ashkenazem
indeed. there are a lot of “black as night” indians…
which makes the “skin color” as supposed determiner…
ABSURD.
(although some indians are more australoid than caucasoid.)
but still, i’ve seen them…
indians with a totally caucasoid facial skeleton who are as black as the blackest african.
the two darkest skin colors are found on the malabar coast and the dry part of the ruwenzori iirc.
There was probably a subset of Caucasoids who after acquiring caucasoid IQ & facial features in the north, then headed south to India & acquired black skin.
A rare example of backwards evolution, if you will.
and interestingly…lebanese have blue eyes at a rate ca 20%…iirc.
and yasser arafat and Rashid Khalidi had/have blue/hazel eyes.
How depressing is it that we won’t be able to see what humans and society achieve 1,000, 2,000, 10,000 or 100,000 years from now?
http://diamed-the-road-less-traveled.blogspot.com.br/2016/07/america-is-schizophrenic.html?m=1
Videla, last year, you wrote:
“a description of whatever as ‘reality’ is a moral judgement.
that is, talk of ‘reality’ or ‘illusion’ is logically preceded by moral judgements.”
how is that?
Moral reasoning is just a post hoc search for reasons to justify the judgments people have already made. When people are asked why, for certain questions, they find things morally wrong, they say they cannot think of a reason but they still think it is wrong. This has been verified by numerous studies. Moral reasoning evolved as a skill to further social cohesiveness and to further our social agendas.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/07/11/the-evolution-of-morality/
Moral judgements are post hoc searches for reasons to I studio judgements we have already made.
For reasons to justify judgements*
“Automatic processes run the human mind, just as they have been running animal minds for the last 500 million years, so they’re very good at what they do, like software that has been improved through thousands of product cycles. When human beings evolved the capacity for language and reasoning at some point in the last million years, the brain did not rewire itself to hand over the reigns to a new and inexperienced charioteer. Rather, the rider (language-based reasoning, controlled processes, including “reasoning why”) evolved because it did something useful for the elephant (automatic processes, including emotions, intuition, and all forms of “seeing that”) (Haidt, 2012, pg 53 to 54).”
The “rider” (reasoning) evolved because it did something useful for the “elephant” (emotions).
Reasoning evolved because it increased fitness. Not for any imaginary reason, like philosophers would like you to think.
”Reasoning evolved because it increased fitness. Not for any imaginary reason, like philosophers would like you to think.”
Real morality increase fitness…
– reduce mortality
– increase genetic diversity
– increase environmental stability
etc
and yes, ”we” also have such philosophical things that FULL human beings can accept without any problem…
the only and great problem of human society is
the wrong people love is in the command of the societies
power attract greedy
and wrong people who think selfishly make the life worst for most people most part of time…
philosophy there to show for human retardeds that reason ‘and’ harmony can be good for most of us if ‘we’ want…
i can guess what i meant or know what i meant.
please tell me which of peepee’s posts my comment is under.
“Is intelligence the mental ability to adapt?”
https://pumpkinperson.com/2015/01/24/is-intelligence-the-mental-ability-to-adapt/#comment-8738
yes the foregoing is what i meant.
i am an absolut idealist…in the philosophical sense…https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_idealism
and furthermore i believe that anything less is simply incoherent, meaningless, or jive talk.
to use the vulgar example…
as flushton might say…
The Matrix is a genuine theoretical possibility.
what is this world really?
is it one of many?
without this world what is the ground? what is ultimate reality?
my answer is that good and evil, right and wrong, beauty and ugliness are more fundamental than scientific facts.
as heidegger…and the guy was a prophet…said…
Those in the crossing must in the end know what is mistaken by all urging for intelligibility: that every thinking of being, all philosophy, can never be confirmed by “facts,” ie, by beings…Those who idolize “facts” never notice that their idols only shine in a borrowed light. They are also meant not to notice this; for thereupon they would have to be at a loss and therefore useless. But idolizers and idols are used wherever gods are in flight and so announce their nearness.
btw, i say this as one whose ug degree is in math and whose grad degree is in chemistry…and i scored the 99th percentile on all four of the American Chemical Society’s exams and on the GRE subject test in chemistry…and the high score in n america on the old SoA exam 100 for undergraduates…one graduate beat me when i sat it. and i’ve passed all the SoA’s/CAS’s math exams.
or to put it another way…
man is the measure of all things…
it isn’t the world that matters, it’s how one takes the world.
one may take it to heart, or one may laugh at it.
as eco said:
William of Baskerville: My venerable brother, there are many books that speak of comedy. Why does this one fill you with such fear?
Jorge de Burgos: Because it’s by Aristotle.
William of Baskerville: [Chasing after Jorge who runs with the Second Book of Poetics by Aristotle intending to destroy it] But what is so alarming about laughter?
Jorge de Burgos: Laughter kills fear, and without fear there can be no faith because without fear of the Devil, there is no more need of God.
William of Baskerville: But you will not eliminate laughter by eliminating that book.
Jorge de Burgos: No, to be sure, laughter will remain the common man’s recreation. But what will happen if, because of this book, learned men were to pronounce it admissable to laugh at everything? Can we laugh at God? The world would relapse into chaos! Therefore, I seal that which was not to be said.
[he eats the poisoned pages of the book]
Jorge de Burgos: In the tomb I become.
[he tosses the book at the candle, which ignites a fire that destroys all the books in the abbey tower]
and it is certainly true that what people call good or evil, beautiful or ugly
IS subject to science…
BUT the truth value of such judgements…
IS NOT.
AND such judgements vary over time and place…quite a lot.
for moral and aesthetic relativists this means that such judgements are meaningless.
i disagree.
as i told peepee…i am a very simple person…
i believe in facts.
AND
i believe in good and evil, beauty and ugliness.
the latter makes me a weirdo…inter alia.
my guess is i meant the peshat, in jew language…that is, it’s not a riddle.
morality precedes science, but at the same time is not subject to science.
that is, questions of right and wrong, good and evil, beauty and ugliness are not “scientific questions”.
this has been used to dismiss such questions as meaningless/question-able in the last 150 years.
but i regard such judgements as true or false all the same.
science has made an idol of the world.
but the world need not be taken as “the world”.
what do i mean by that?
1. man is greater than the world. he transforms the world through his labor.
2. a cosmology without the multiverse is incoherent.
3. #2 is the only argument for theism which christopher hitchens respected, but religious people are so fucking retarded they don’t make it and can’t even understand it.
one may laugh at the world.
as max baer said…
oh God. here i go.
and yes. i know more about judaism than most jews.
If I can control my mind I can control reality. Apparently the frequency of your brainwaves determines digit span. My digit span is 5 so 5Hz. Average people have gamawave at 80Hz. Experienced zen monks have been measured at 120Hz. Perception and digit span exist in the gaps of frequency. Monks perceive more in those gaps.
I have been taking Gabapentin for a month now. It is inhibitory neurotransmitter. Glutamate is an excitatory neurotransmitter and a amino acid. Over half the brain chemicals are these two. My brain is highly agitated but I feel better now, more relaxed. The wires connect in such a way to allow gaps that are small or large. Loops inside loops. Multiverse is the same but in the 5th dimension of all past and future histories.
It hurts my feelings sometimes that I may not be a nice person. Because I can’t handle pain well so I can’t be strong enough to help. But I have maintained my integrity no matter how dark my thoughts were. I just shifted to a reality where I was not pushed too far. They say the brain has no pain receptors but I have felt my brain regions on fire. To find the needle you burn the haystack. Some buddhist proverb says.
I think the reason (g) exists is because of integrity of the whole emotional being frequency gap symmetry. We have pain signals for a reason, morality holds you back if you can’t understand what it is. It hurts you more to hurt others than it does yourself. Buddha says anger is a poison but amygdala is not the whole haystack. I sometimes think should I really be angry, should I really be sad. People act on what is on the inside in good or bad ways but actions can be used to ignore the feelings that needs to be felt.
”If I can control my mind I can control reality.”
What i will test in myself, i’m a pretty intuitive person, i will try to be less intuitive and more deliberated thinker.
I will increase my inner voice frequency.
i will try to stop some of my habits.
seems the brain prepare absolutely to do certain thing, CREATE EXPECTATIONS about it (accumulate greater energy)
as if you’re being prepared to go in the party of your school and you enjoy pretty much it, creating expectations, but the party is cancelled…
you broken heart…
exactly, when we must can to do something, the brain prepare itself beforehand.
you try to control your thoughts, it’s like try to do tickle in yourself, but you can reflect it via inner voice what you are doing.
reflective thinking is possible, like describe what you’re doing now, in that exact moment,
the possible end of automatic mode that prevail in most part of the known life
human create automatic tools while should be evolved to the manual way of life.
domestication is not evolution
i wonder if peepee or flushton has an explanation for why most variation in pigmentation occurs in one continent…europe.
the only reasonable explanation is that all that variety is basically a variety in lack of melanin and that europeans are the fairest in eyes, hair, and skin…
because they inhabited a cold region that was also at a higher latitude than the mongoloids.
that is,
1. they had to bundle up (less skin exposed), and
2. beijing is at the same latitude as madird…far south of london and oslo and tallinn.
therefore,
in order to make the sunshine vitamin, vitamin D, they were selected for very little pigmentation. some can’t even tan.
the sun is weaker at all times of year at higher latitudes…in case y’all didn’t know that.
You are correct. But Europe has the warm Gulf Stream so it’s warmer than NE Asia. So NE Asians still have larger heads on average.
Skin color= sunlight. IQ=temp. The two correlate highly but not perfectly s,l
”2. beijing is at the same latitude as madird…far south of london and oslo and tallinn.”
I’ve talked about this.
Supposedly, the Mongoloids evolved [firstly] in the high plateau of Mongolia, but it makes little sense that has not evolved in less freezing places like the Chinese coast.
Western Europe is less continental than China, has this detail.
The temperature range in China appears to be as high as North America and Western Europe.
And during the ice age, northern Europe was likely that was not populated.
” European ” (Caucasian) and Asian northeast (Mongoloid) (among other Asian groups like the Dravidians) according to what says the genetic evidence originated from the same group.
Perhaps a silly, but all women of all races tend to be lighter in tone than men on average. And women tend to be healthier. But if humanity or part of it had already reached a high level of behavioral sophistication, of course, to prehistory, then it is quite possible that sexual selection has happened and selected for light eyes.
Interesting to think how that diversity in pigmentation is selected in other species, what criteria were ”used”…
very dark people in environments that spend half the year in low light is usually not a good combination you guys do not think *
Finally, do not know, delirious.
nomadic societies have no time to think on frivolities such as eye color. Most populations of hunter-gatherers are not very attractive in terms of gracilization. It also appears that the selection is directed to men’s health, by the ease that they have to sculpt muscles.
http://ifamericansknew.org/
…..
…
…
less with white people, 😉
You should really watch Breaking Bad PP.
Besides the fact that this is probably the best TV-show of all time for many reasons, it’s quite racially realistic. Except when it come to Walter Jr. who doesn’t look like his parents at all.
I think you would find the main character fascinating with his genius IQ. He really fit your definition of intelligence in the sense that it is the ability to adapt.
People who don't like this show generally have low social IQ or simply low IQ.
I’ve only seen it a few times but i thought it was really good
You should watch it entirely.
the best movie ever is nightmare before chrismas. or sleepy hallow.
NMBC is a great film