An interesting debate between two young Canadian journalists/activists about whether Putin deserves all the worship that he’s been getting in the alternative media.
One of them argues that Putin must be a terrible person just to have made it to the top of the KGB and because he was mean to the Chechens, but the other argues Putin has saved tens of millions of lives so he’s been an incredible force for good.
The Putin discussion starts at about 34:30:
White proles admire Putin because he is a smarter version of themselves. White proles hate Obama because he is black, intellectual and liberal.
Putin is inherently unideological considering how he wants to resurrect Soviet influence over eastern Europe while ironically making friends with the orthodox patriarch.
I believe because ideology and iq positively correlate, the brightest are too biased to ever lead and become very unpopular.
“I believe because ideology and iq positively correlate, the brightest are too biased to ever lead and become very unpopular.”
Of course, Marx, Rand, etc. were never really Political leaders. Virtually none of our Presidents have been (only the early ones)- more intellectual/ ideological based figures like the Progressive guy from Wisconsin in 1924 (can’t remember his name) floundered in that election.
“Putin is inherently unideological considering how he wants to resurrect Soviet influence over eastern Europe while ironically making friends with the orthodox patriarch.”
Largely true as well, he’s a pragmatist for his nation.
I’ve read your comments for a long time, you are perhaps the best commenter on this blog; keep up the good work!
Now, as to my opinion of why Alt-Right types like Putin, it’s that they construe “anti-Euro”/ “anti-Merkel”, etc. as “Anti-Browns” and hence chimp out when presented with his image. It also appears that his inherent lack of ideology registered with their simple minds and they do endorse.
With the exception of some writers over at the Unz review, the vast majority of Alt-Righters are really intellectually children, just repeating mantras- mantras that really don’t even stand up to close scrutiny. I try not to waste too much time understanding them anymore 🙂 lol. I’ll stick with Alt-Left.
I bet you like Obama because he does have kind of his own ideas/ intellectual opinions/ doctrines on things- especially foreign policy…for me that’s why I am an Obamaphile.
”White proles admire Putin because he is a smarter version of themselves. White proles hate Obama because he is black, intellectual and liberal.”
First, i don’t know exactly why ”white proles” (classicism detected) admire putin, maybe you’re right about it, but i think to the ”smart-street” or ”practical” people in Murrica, Putin look ”conservatively correct” in its surface… but…. i don’t have news showing that he is openly:
– against mass immigration,
– against so-called multiculturalism,
– pro- white caucasian race preservation,
– against anjooische power,
etc
openly against AND actively against, i mean, creating laws, supporting nationalist russian parties, etc…
he have incentived ”russian” fertility but many countries already have taken the same attitude.
Maybe ”white libs” also admire obama because he is a smarter version of themselves, 😉
Obama is intellectual by what**
Today anyone can be treated as ”intellectual”… period.
Again a harsh caricature of the white ordinary people…
maybe this can be just your self-projection, what do you think about them and not the precise description of what they really think about it.
People really misunderstood ”racist’ attitudes.
Saint putin never was…
He’s not too much anti- those things, apparently there are some Black people in Russia.
For the average Russian– the economy does not seem to be so great (less immigration requested) and he’s Anti-Euro, which in their simplistic mind(s) only associate “Euro” with “Immigents/Browns/they took ur’ jobs”…
Winfred/Whatever that guy calls himself now is absolutely right…
Russian Federation have in proportional terms 25 million of immigrants if i’m not wrong, most of them who are ex-soviet camarat. CIS seems to be a continuation of soviet union but via soft or indirect power.
Yes, russian economy increase specially because natural resources is not* Like Brazil but with a immense/still obsolet (or not) industrial park. And also because the recent global economic boom caused by chinese boom.
Maybe their vague political position is designed.
“Maybe their vague political position is designed.”
Santa Claus took his adderall this morning, because that is correct.
It’s a vacuum of power.
did they mention that putin came to power by bombing an apartment building and blaming it on chechen terrorists?
putin has killed many of his critics.
Litvinenko, Politkovskaya, Nemtsov, etc.
putin has enriched himself and those loyal to him. so have the clintons, but putin and his crowd make the clintons look like garbage men.
russia is government by gangsters. and putin is the don/boss.
how can you not know this. the guy is pure evil.
Yes, the Spaniard Canadian journalist is very critical of Putin, but Putin is so wildly popular in the alternative media that it’s hard to criticise him.
The attitude seems to be “Putin may be a bastard, but he’s our bastard.”
Who cares. By thle way, did you read the Plomin piece? He’s won, dude. The blank slate has lost. You can see that in what he says . https://www.edge.org/conversation/robert_plomin-why-were-different
Behaviour genetics is one of the top sciences in the current day.
the blank slate lost a long time ago carl-tard.
but blank slatism is no more retarded than hereditism.
why is this impossible for you to understand carl-tard?
GxE is what matters…at least in the developed world…or within any one country.
G and E by themselves are usually boring.
“Behaviour genetics is one of the top sciences in the current day.”
or rather that is to say…
E matters a lot when it’s the difference between developed and developing countries, and within one country a P = G + E model may fit the data fairly well, but when the range of environments is expanded to include the whole developed world, it likely doesn’t work well at all.
and in response to cockring…
1. there are geographically defined populations of whites which are at least as dumb as most blacks…
the redlegs of barbados, the cajuns of louisiana, the hillbillies of eastern kentucky and appalachia in general.
2. that whites and blacks may live within the same country or region does not mean that they have the same environment…meaning that…
one would never expect to see norm crossing as blacks and whites never occupy the same environment qua populations. on the other hand black and white individuals often do occupy the same environment. for example the rapper eminem was mistaken for a black guy (by blacks who knew him only by his voice) and was raised among blacks. whites like him i expect aren’t any smarter than the average black in IQ terms. and as flushton himself noted, black military officers have higher IQs than white enlisted men.
on the other hand apartheid (correct pronunciation “apart-ate”) and supremacism are two very different things despite their conflation by mass media.
so supremacism is in fact common among three types:
1. whites who are themselves inferior and have nothing but their race as indication of their superiority.
2. whites who are totally out of touch and have never seen how utterly stupid and dysfunctional white people can be.
3. charles murray combines both of these. he hates himself, and since college he’s been totally out of touch. that is…
whites whose motivation for “anti-racism” is really just their own class insecurity, because they associate racism with white trash. that is, they don’t love other races, they hate the members of their own race that they fear they might be…so to say.
within the prevailing ideology of “race and culture are irrelevant, because the elite only cares about money”…
the only political consequences of behavior genetics, as far as race goes, is ending affirmative action.
but i’ve hated race based affirmative action forever.
i do favor affirmative action based on ancestry and class background though. namely an affirmative action based on how genuinely american one is and how poor ones parents and grandparents were.
needless to say such affirmative action would benefit mostly the descendants of slaves and above all the “first nations”/american indians/indigenes and then whites.
anything less is immoral and globalist douche-ery.
There’s literally no evidence for GxE, and I don’t think you’ve forgotten the papers I linked you a while back showing there to be no detectable GxE
indeed carl there is no evidence for gxe at the level populations…
well except turkheimer’s 2 papers.
what’re you retarded?
anyway carl,
you’re IQ is too low to have anything interesting to say about IQ.
all studies to date have been local.
no gxe is what i would expect.
but at the same time,
the supposed gxe that pseudo-scientists like plomin test for is not gxe at all…
and they’re too fucking retarded to know this.
“There’s literally no evidence for GxE, and I don’t think you’ve forgotten the papers I linked you a while back showing there to be no detectable GxE”
Tucker-Drob’s meta-analysis from 2015 found GxE. They included Turkheimer’s paper too (which was a slight outlier but relevant all the same.)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3c4TxciNeJZUE9kQ2NMSnBmVGs/view
Large Cross-National Differences in Gene × Socioeconomic Status Interaction on Intelligence = GxE = norms of reaction
it’s that easy!
Your rebuttal to Cochran is stupid because as he explains in his post, these IQ differences between white populations is due to population substructure. The redlegs or hillbillies have a lower genetic IQ than the aggregated white average.
Read closer https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2016/07/09/our-dumb-world/
”that it’s hard to criticise him”
Only for you.
”How about the humanities become more scientific? Fund scientific method. Defund non-scientifi” via twitter
this ”smarter” tend to be so … dumb
I’ve spent six years of my life in Ukraine, and have seen firsthand the effects of Putin’s manifest destiny view of Russia in Eastern Europe. From the faux referendum in Crimea to the proxy invasion of Donbass, Putin’s actions have cost tens of thousands of lives and disrupted millions more.
The Putin worship from the alt-right is easily explainable. He is strong and nationalistic, whereas Barack Obama is weak and globalistic.
What so many of his admirers forget is that being strong is only admirable if that strength is used to protect others. And being nationalistic is only commendable if one accepts equally the sovereignty of other nations. Putin uses the strength of his country to bully his neighbors and impinge on their sovereignty. There is nothing good, nothing praiseworthy, nothing just in him.
Globalism is a dog whistle…..
If “Invade the world, invite the world” turned into just “invade the world”, and the Alt-Reichers didn’t have to look upon “Browns” they wouldn’t care…..
they admit they are intellectually incapable of understanding anything beyond “mud, cuck, or hero” Obama is a “mud” and Putin is a “hero”
you’re clueless guy.
the roman empire, the russian (and then soviet) empire, the greek/alexandrian empire, the caliphates, india and pakistan (and east pakistan, bangladesh)…former colonies and former colonial empires, etc.
what do all of these taken together PROVE?
that the “nation state” is the only stable polity, and the least shitty in every way.
there is some optimum between:
1. every individual is his own sovereign state, and…
2. one world government.
that “happy medium” is the nation state…the big family.
Pie in the sky ideals…
not reflective of the real world,
in terms of economics/ growth rates, the establishment has in the past tried to be more “real”
….
Obama said today what I’ve been saying on this blogs for weeks about birth rates, etc. and economic growth…
https://pumpkinperson.com/2016/07/04/interesting-interview-with-milo-yiannopoulos/#comment-29080
riddle me that….
riddle me obama?
are you serious?
the guy is a sheep.
he may have an IQ of 140, but he’s still a sheep.
and you’re again confusing “the economy” with the general welfare. “the economy” is a macro variable, but all that really matters is the living standards of individuals.
as buffett said:
If I wanted to, I could hire 10,000 people to do nothing but paint my picture every day for the rest of my life. And the GDP would go up. But the utility of the product would be zilch, and I would be keeping those 10,000 people from doing AIDS research, or teaching, or nursing.
Perhaps Globalists are despicable…………perhaps
but the point is, what I’ve been saying is a plausbile explantation to mass immigration being encouraged
the r/k selectivity/ growth rate thing/median age , with relations to the economy…..the Globalists (disproportionately from the Western world) just want to help the economy, not look out for the Tribe of Israel and kill Whites.
I MAY renege on my Pro-Asian rhetoric…
since Asian countries are fucked due to their low growth rates/sky rocket median age….they are obviously to tribalistic to do what they have to do!
r/k is
REEE…
TARDED.
what was the TFR of japanese or chinese 100 years ago?
8 chillens per woman. THAT’S what it was!
what was it for brazilians 40 years ago?
my parents served in the peace corps in brazil (when the peace corp was a very very elite thing*)…i know…
i know…
what it USED to be like in brazil…at least.
it’s not like that anymore in brazil.
brazil’s TFR is below replacement…
it’s less than ICELAND’S!!!
look it up!!!
!!!
even though brazil is at most 50% white or white-ish.
*not only was my dad a harvard college grad, but the volunteers in brazil he knew best both went on to some harvard grad school.
Partially correct, there is really no racial theme
I.E. Asian peasants may have had more children than African-Americans…
BUT
it relates to the infrastructure/ life expectancy of the country….
and ultimately we are at the point where we have great infrastructure/high life expectancy, we go K…then over generations, there are less and less (the increased age does not do enough to compensate) and boom,
median age like 80…..
YOU CAN BE A 100% HBD DENIER AND ACKNOWLEDGE R-K SELECTIVITY.
because as you say “civilization varies greatly from time to time, place to place”
Do I really make “pro-HBD” statements? Not really.
and guy…
i think “nordicists” are 100% WRONG!
they ARE white trash.
but why is it that…
portugal, spain, italy…
all have significantly lower TFRs than…
sweden, denmark, norway, iceland, and finland?
it’s because they have significantly less economic security.
…
my response to the shavian (devotee of g b shaw)…
i’m about as feminist a guy as possible, but…
ladies, if you want to be taken seriously:
1. no make-up, no jewelry.
2. shave your heads.
3. wear pants.
4. you’re more attractive for it, not less. a man who’s attracted by anything other than than your XX genotype is a fag.
women may be the ultimate example of stockholm syndrome.
”just want to help the economy”
OUR heroes!!!!
why aging**
avg european women want to have 2 kids but living standard is too high for most of them specially in nations such Spain and Italy.
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/04/11/birth-rates-lag-in-europe-and-the-u-s-but-the-desire-for-kids-does-not/
your globalist heroes created the demographic problems like lower fertility and proportional increasing of elderly people in the demographic pyramid exactly thinking about mass immigration
’cause
(((they))) are globalists, they want to create a planetary nation mixing all people, to create a single human race.
for my dear lord,
this is OBVIOUS!!!!!
in the same way is obvious that astrology is far to be rationally useful.
http://family-studies.org/the-ideal-and-reality-in-european-family-size/
”4. you’re more attractive for it, not less. a man who’s attracted by anything other than than your XX genotype is a fag.”
avg women are false as hell with their looking.
remember free will doesn’t exist.
you prefer a ugly woman than a beautiful man in the same way a tribalist prefer a morally retarded kin than a virtuous outsider.
“your globalist heroes created the demographic problems like lower fertility and proportional increasing of elderly people in the demographic pyramid exactly thinking about mass immigration”
Oh my god, not this nonsense….
THE REASON, AS I HAVE STATED MANY TIMES, IS AN ARTIFICIAL RESPONSE TO INCREASED LIFE EXPECTANCY AS A COUNTRY’S INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVES, OVER TIME, BECAUSE THE POPULATION FUNCTION IS LIKE 2^X AND NOT LINEAR, THE INCREASED LIFE-EXPECTANCY DOES NOT DO ENOUGH TO MAINTAIN THE GROWTH RATES.
my god, guy, it’s not that hard.
I had a complete grasp of this subject by age 15.
If you give “globalists” or “Jews” credit for this issue- you also give credit to them for living in modernity/ a stable country.
get it now?
women don’t get that the only things they can do to make themselves more physically attractive is:
1. exercise
2. eat healthfully.
wait…
so gay-fair claims that the below replacement TFRs are due solely or mostly to an “over response” to increased life expectancy?
“so gay-fair claims that the below replacement TFRs are due solely or mostly to an “over response” to increased life expectancy?”
At least growth rates, which could effect economic stats (which you are getting at?)..
so
bottom line;
yes.
”Brazil is modern or stable country…”
ok
i made i though very objective questions for you willy repugnant
why aging**
why not give to the native euro or japanese women the best infrastructure for them to have their desirable number of kids and also to remain its professional career** (this is the ONLY/BEST, obvious and rational response/procedure)
Answer this two questions if you are really at least a honest ”debater”.
population aging IS NOT natural.
but i’m talking with a ”astrologer”.
Another retarded,
your ”thinking” (read mental regurgitation) lines are SELFISH… because you’re a mixed race g0y you think globalism is better to you than ethno-nativism… specially whitey-ethno-nativism.
slave
https://heartiste.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/6pu45y-jpg.png?w=550&h=309
-“why aging?”
because when a country becomes more developed there are more technological and educational resources to treat ailing old people, driving up the life expectancy (and from there artificial “correction” so to speak, blah blah, blah).
-Brazil, although corrupt, is most likely, in most parts, a weak first world. It’s certainly not “third world”, you have internet, don’t you?
-I am not “mixed race”. Although my father has Latin American roots, 5 of his 8 great grandparents were born in Iberia. He’s very White. My mother is Anglo-American.
But even if I was, I’ve explained there are reasons vital to the economy as a whole. You’re getting into irrelevant personal details.
”because when a country becomes more developed there are more technological and educational resources to treat ailing old people, driving up the life expectancy (and from there artificial “correction” so to speak, blah blah, blah).”
WHAT****
ok ok
it’s will be harder than i thought
”-Brazil, although corrupt, is most likely, in most parts, a weak first world. It’s certainly not “third world”, you have internet, don’t you?”
have internet = quality of life***
”-I am not “mixed race”. Although my father has Latin American roots, 5 of his 8 great grandparents were born in Iberia. He’s very White. My mother is Anglo-American.”
Do you’re a chameleon**
a white trash, whatever.
”But even if I was, I’ve explained there are reasons vital to the economy as a whole. You’re getting into irrelevant personal details.”
so ”explanation” have a different meaning to you.
and the other question*
i will reformulate my first question about aging, i thought you don’t understand, 😉
why (((western))) government not tried to stop the aging population **
If the majority of European women want to have at least two children ….
if gay-fair is telling the truth he should know that the trumpenproletariat has no objection to iberians.
gay-fair is a delusional.
only the so-called “nordicists” object, but aren’t they a small minority among “racists”?
despite their failings, those latin american countries with the highest living standards are also the whitest. aren’t they?
argentina, chile, costa rica, etc.
in fact i regard the unmixed european latin america with awe.
he’s an aristocrat even if he’s broke.
at least to my way of thinking.
”despite their failings, those latin american countries with the highest living standards are also the whitest. aren’t they?
argentina, chile, costa rica, etc.”
Cuba before ”re-evolution”*
In Brazil the highest standard living are in areas formerly white-ish.
and cuba still has a standard of living above average for latin america.
it also has a high life expectancy and low birth rate.
Absolute baloney.
Trump’s prolentariat has MASSIVE objections to anybody who even Speaks Spanish or the immediate relatives of those who do!
http://www.amren.com/news/2016/01/ted-cruzs-immigration-reversal/
Read “Chip Carver”
SEEMS to imply Ted Cruz is non-White
“if the laws weren’t circumvented for years by the people that control Cruz, he wouldn’t be here”
possibly;
he’s a White who takes advantage of the ’65 immigration Act.
OR
he’s non-White.
and “Jim”
‘OMG Ted Cruz is so awesome, he’s my token spic, he doesn’t speak that muddy Spanish stuff, OMG you guys, I had an orgasm”….
get it?
Albeit, “Chip Carver”‘s comment only got seven likes.
Or they could think he’s a mestizo.
But it makes me uncomfortable, regardless.
Perhaps your right…
the numbers were so small as a proportion, maybe, that Nordicism is perhaps plausible.
BUT
maybe not…maybe not…..
Tenn is 100% right
And it’s fascinating that Tenn lived in Ukraine for 6 years.
Higher IQs are associated with less EGI (otherwise known as cucked faggotry). Russians are not an exception.
(Of course cucking for svidomy ukrs is a particularly pathetic low).
Higher IQs are associated with less EGI (otherwise known as cucked faggotry). Russians are not an exception
I would say higher IQ is associated with more empathy, and thus high IQ people can supress their EGI to help oppressed peoples. However if your own people are being oppressed, then high IQ might actually magnify EGIs because your tribalism can be intellectually justified on moral grounds. This is not a well researched topic though, so I could be wrong.
seriously Tenn/peepee?
the ukraine and belarus are russia.
they may not think they are, but they are.
the baltics and the other former soviet states are not russia.
ukraine or belarus vs russia is like n carolina vs s carolina or sweden vs denmark vs norway.
it’s a “distinction without a difference”.
Jorge, but you’re a farking retard if you think that Ukraine is culturally indistinguishable from Russia or that Ukrainians are ethnically Russian. Read Orest Subtelny’s Ukraine: A History, and then you might be prepared to start having this conversation. Till then, or in absence of a cogent argument, I’ll happily ignore your pathetic commentary and let you persist in your childish ignorance.
For starters, though, if Ukrainian and Russian are truly synonymous terms, then how can you even begin to account for the vast differences in culture between Ukraine’s western and eastern regions, the former of which are almost entirely Ukrainian and the latter of which are split much more evenly between Russians and Ukrainians? To act as if all east Slavs are ethnically the same is to ignore a millennium of cultural evolution.
And this doesn’t even begin to touch on the stupidity of suggesting that cultural similarities between Ukraine and Russia somehow justifies Putin’s invasion…
https://books.google.com.br/books?id=DDT-DxHJ5JYC&pg=PA242&lpg=PA242&dq=high+verbal+iq+and+personality+traits&source=bl&ots=mJ22K5f7pD&sig=H8rqjsWe3H2I7XndcCkYGpt-094&hl=pt-BR&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjDt47X-OPNAhVJDpAKHRrFAHgQ6AEIUDAF#v=onepage&q=high%20verbal%20iq%20and%20personality%20traits&f=false