I’ve been posting a lot about the wildly entertaining and very talented Milo Yiannopoulos lately, but it seems not everyone is a fan. Canada’s very own Brandon Martinez has some scathing criticism.
Martinez accuses Milo of having a secret calculated agenda, that he’s not sharing with us fans. It’s kind of interesting because Milo was praising Trump for being so calculated and clever.
Advertisements
“Homosexual neocon“
Hahahaahaha
Breitbart is neither kosher nor neo-con
the guy is retarded
Ben Shapiro used to largely run it. He’s a neocon.
I think it started out neocon, before breitbart himself died but perhaps the readership have become trump fans, forcing a lot of the anti-trump neocons out
It was started by a neo-con Jew…and it certainly isn’t a neo-con outlet anymore
It started as neocon but then was taken over by Trump fans. Some neocons like Trump because he’s anti-Muslim, but many hate him because he’s anti-immigration.
Sensing the hostility to Trump, Trump’s fans drove neocons like Ben Shapiro out, but neocons like Milo have been able to adapt by jumping on the Trump bandwagon.
I’ve commented on Breitbart in the past-distant and near. PP is seemingly right.
Although Milo’s Trumpmania seems genuine; not part of any strategy.
I’m banned from Breitbart for speaking the truth about Milo.
Breitbart directly shills for Israel.
”Some neocons like Trump because he’s anti-Muslim”
less with saudi families.
PP,
See, I told you that Milo is controlled opposition. He has no idea what he’s talking about.
He’s just there to put muh inclusion into the alt-right.
Not to mention, I’m sure that when a new non-PC study gets released on homosexuals that he will not show how ‘un-PC’ he is.
I like him as an entertainer. I don’t really care about anyone’s politics. But perhaps you & AWPW might have been right.
Pumpkin,
why so many ashkenazis have assimetrical faces*
It probably has to do with inbreeding and perhaps from poor nutrition. I can’t imagine Jewish food coming from Eastern Europe was all that great.
I doubt…
i think jews because higher % of mental illness among them have higher % of people with some physiological ”defects’ that are also common among mentally disordered people. Also this (((specific))) brilliance seems directly related to this higher % of mental illness and disorder among them.
https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2016/07/06/a-bit-more-on-bullying/
First, Bullying = irrational, sadistic and systematic persecution and generally against a one individual.
In other words, bullying is unacceptable in any situation.
If it is irrational, because often those who suffer persecution in school are children of good heart or have any virtue that monkery disgusts or envy.
So the simple phrase: ” bullying is acceptable in some circumstances ”, is already totally wrong. A really good philologist, know correctly analyze the sentences, associating the meanings of the terms that are used and giving rational judgments. And it’s pretty far to be rational.
”However, teasing, taunting, and roughhousing is just boys being boys.”
War = men being men
tards gonna tards
In this case i agree with feminists that man is a beast who are destroying the nature, the planet.
I intended to refute point by point, but the simple fact of the term ” bullying ” have been misunderstood, made me rethink this possibility.
Let’s return to planet Earth that mister Lindsay usually do not live.
At school, you have all normies-types and outsiders or exotic ones coexisting forcibly and for the first time in their lifes. Earlier, all the features that the ” hbds ” say love, are rejected: intelligence, creativity and kindness.
Too smart children/teen are discriminated.
Too creative children/teen are discriminated.
Too kind children/teen are discriminated.
any virtue is discriminated, first in the school, late in adult social environments. and when you have combos of virtues, for example, intelligent and kind, discrimination tends to increase considerably.
”Crybaby boys. Boys should not cry or at least they should not cry excessively. It is not acceptable for a 10 year old boy to be crying all the time. He needs to be bullied, teased, roughhoused, even hit, to get the message that males simply cannot do that in our society. Also the rest of the boys need to be taunt that boys and men simply cannot be crybabies. That is as unacceptable as it gets. Do you want to raise generations of crybaby men? Come on.”
I agree that you could not be a crystal because life can be very cruel, you must be balanced. However, there are children who are more emotional. The problem may not be the most exaggerated emotionality but the lack of a cognitive control or cognitive wisdom to channel what would be a defect into a quality, an advantage.
However, one should, in fact, put in the place of the people to understand why their actions. When the lie no longer be the norm will be easier to understand human behavior.
”Seriously effeminate boys. Sorry, no boy is born effeminate. I feel that this is obviously learned behavior. That means they could knock it off anytime. Boys need to get a strong message that serious effeminacy is not acceptable. If that means teasing, taunting, etc. effeminate boys, that is fine with me. The rest of the boys need to be told that this is not ok. If you do not do this, you might end up with a lot more effeminate men than their already are, and that would not be good. You might end up with whole generations of effeminate men.”
laughs moments here.
seriously effeminate men are born that way. Behavior is learned only if a superficial level in relation to personality, the essence. Culture can hide or exalting, that’s true. But I do not think it’s something ” learned ” but subconsciously ‘adapted’.
”Weirdos, idiots, seriously dorked out nerds and fools. Look man, if you are this much of a nerd, idiot, fool, dork, clumsy, awkward idiot clown of a boy, that is just not acceptable. Boys who act that way deserve bullying, teasing, taunting and even a bit of roughhousing. They need to get the message that they need to knock it off, and the rest of the boys need to get the message that this is seriously not ok. Otherwise you might end up with thole generations of nerdy, dorky, idiotic, lame and foolish men.”
The culture tends to homogenize people in their respective behavioral surfaces. So we have now a multitude of communist leftists repeating the same mantras, watching movies Foucault and Kurosawa, reading Dostoieski and Nietzche’s books, but in fact they tend to be much more variable in their personalities, cognitive levels and intrinsic motivations without this ”mask of [in]sanity”.
Bullying is the ‘thought / action’ ‘irrational par excellence, when the older brother of a group of puppies, kill the younger brother.
Lack BASIC dialogue among people and it cannot be justified.
https://scontent-gru2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13567445_1224766264224678_3585162378781750751_n.jpg?oh=7cd77add5694530a8c0d4f9f0f8ed30b&oe=57F1411E