As I’ve said a hundred times before and will say a hundred times again, perhaps the single umbrella that covers all of intelligence is the ability to adapt: to take whatever situation you’re in and turn it around to your advantage.
But what does that really mean?
More precisely, I define intelligence as the brain’s capacity for behavioral adaptability, which I define as:
Behavioral adaptability is the brain’s ability to use whatever body it’s in as a tool to use whatever environment it’s in as a tool to minimize the cost-benefit ratio of whatever incentive structure it has.
So there are many reasons why the correlation between intelligence and success would be far from perfect.
Different people have different bodies. Two people with equal intelligence could differ enormously in physical attractiveness or athletic talent, and that could mean the difference between extreme wealth and poverty.
Different people could have different environments. One man is born to a family of investment bankers while another man is born in rural poverty. The former will likely be much more successful even if the latter is much more intelligent.
Different people have different incentive structures. One man’s idea of success could be raking in millions as a CEO, while another man’s idea of success could be sleeping in everyday until noon and then watching TV the rest of the day.
Given that life is such an unlevel playing field, and then on top of that, success can be defined in so many ways, it is truly remarkable that the correlation between IQ and money is as high as it is. This strongly suggests IQ really is measuring behavioral adaptability.
But the clearest measure of intelligence is not how successful you are, because that’s just a test of your ability to adapt to your body, your environment and your incentive structure, which might not be that difficult…the clearest test is how well your intelligence could tell others how to use their bodies and environments as a tool to their advantage.
A great example of this is the character Master Blaster from the Mad Max movies. Blaster is a muscular mentally retarded giant, but despite his incredible physical advantages, he lacks the basic intelligence needed to turn them around to his advantage. Luckily, he has a high IQ dwarf named Master who sits on his shoulder to tell him how to exploit his physical strengths in fights and other situations, essentially serving as Blaster’s brain every waking hour of the day.

Enter a caption
So this is the ultimate test of intelligence. Instead of being given math problems and vocabulary questions, we should be given someone else to control every minute of the day, perhaps though virtual reality, and the better job we do in telling that person or animal how to reach his specific goals, the higher our score. In a way political consultants and Hollywood agents take this test for a living. Lacking the good looks to run for office or star in movies themselves, they manage the careers of politicians and actors. Indeed Karl Rove was known as Bush’s brain:
We could start the test off controlling a really advantaged person; someone blessed with a strong body, rich environment, and simple goals, thus turning the situation to his advantage would require very little turning.
We would then be given gradually harder problems: tell this wheel chair bound overweight lazy person living in poverty what do every minute of the day so they become rich and powerful, yet still get to sleep in until noon.
I think one’s score on such a test would correlate as well with conventional IQ tests as conventional IQ tests correlate with one another, but it would capture the evolutionary basis of intelligence: Humans lacked physical advantages so we had to use our behavior to our advantage. That’s why intelligence evolved.
Shit.
Speaking of virtual reality, has anyone hear used the Occulus Rift? Holy. Shit. I started to get disconnected from my body and think I was in the game. It was wild!
I do agree with with you that intelligence is the ability to adapt. Higher IQ people would be able to survive in Africa, the same is not true for those from Africa who go to live in Europe (thousands of years ago).
“Higher IQ people would be able to survive in Africa, the same is not true for those from Africa who go to live in Europe (thousands of years ago).”
except that’s not true at all. encephalization occurred on both continents through different mechanisms.
Whenever I hear about people saying this, they mean I’m the present time, not over time. Say, the first 6 months to a year.
except that’s not true at all. encephalization occurred on both continents through different mechanisms.
But the colder the ancestral climate a population lived in, the larger their brain, on average. I’m not saying that that’s entirely caused by colder climates requiring more intelligence. As Mugabe, you, and even Jensen have argued, it’s also because big heads overheat in warm climates like a light bulb, and thus were selected against.
But I suspect part of the correlation is because colder climates did indeed require more intelligence because remember, primates were already well adapted to Africa, having lived their for millions of years. Cold climates required new innovations to survive.
Supposedly, higher abstract thinking capacity correlates more with bigger brains…
Well said PP.
Pumpkin person,
“colder climates did indeed require more intelligence because remember, primates were already well adapted to Africa, having lived their for millions of years. Cold climates required new innovations to survive.”
I understand the logic but if we continue to follow it then wouldn’t native north americans be some of the most intelligent individuals? Also your logic rests on the assumption that the entirety of Africa has the same kind of ecological niche. But this is far from the truth.
Take a look at neanderthals. They were incredibly intelligent beings but when we first went to europe we demolished them through resource competition genetic absorption, violence, and superior intelligence. Not before they stole some of our technology though.
I understand the logic but if we continue to follow it then wouldn’t native north americans be some of the most intelligent individuals?
Ancestral climate & environmental novelty are not the only factors that likely influenced genetic intelligence, but they were perhaps two very big ones.
The third huge factor is probably geographic isolation. Even though the cold selected aggressively for high IQ genes in North America, there were probably few high IQ genes to select because the Americas are cut-off from gene flow by two oceans. So major mutations that were spreading like wildfire through Eurasia and Africa could not reach the Americas or Australia.
So what seems to have happened is brain size got extremely big, especially in the arctic, because that was the only way they could get smarter, because they were cut-off from genes for other properties of the brain. But brain size alone is not enough, unless you take it to an extreme, and that’s not practical because a huge head is a severe physical liability, especially in child birth.
A similar explanation may also explain the Neanderthals, who were also geographically isolated from the mainstream of human evolution.
Also your logic rests on the assumption that the entirety of Africa has the same kind of ecological niche. But this is far from the truth.
If sub-Saharan Africa on average required less intelligence, then the average sub-Saharan would be less intelligent, especially since there was substantial mixing of people from different parts of sub-Sahara.
“So what seems to have happened is brain size got extremely big, especially in the arctic, because that was the only way they could get smarter, because they were cut-off from genes for other properties of the brain. But brain size alone is not enough, unless you take it to an extreme, and that’s not practical because a huge head is a severe physical liability, especially in child birth.”
You may be on to something, I was taking a look at what robert lindsay had posted a while back: https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2010/03/11/the-head-sizeraceiq-trainwreck/
Notice that native americans have very similar brain sizes to europeans but are still vastly lower in IQ than they are. I have a hunch that the correlation between brain size and mean temperature is higher than brain size and IQ. So it seems that native americans still evolved the bigger brains because of their climate before they crossed the sea bridge so it can’t really be a lack of gene flow seeing as how they already had the big brains when they arrived there. It may be more due to a lack of necessity, or possibly even caused by the attempted genocide by european settlers. However this is assuming that genes for big brains are equivalent to genes for higher IQ/intelligence.
“If sub-Saharan Africa on average required less intelligence, then the average sub-Saharan would be less intelligent, especially since there was substantial mixing of people from different parts of sub-Sahara.”
Yes, but that is still only true if you assume that sub saharan africa is less harsh of an environment. Eurasian encephalization was from Migration bottle necks caused by environmental novelty followed by a demand for larger brains because of heat conservation and this was supplemented through a increase in protein based diets because hunting versus gathering became the preferred method for collecting food. I think eurasia may be harder to survive when it comes to collecting food but I seriously doubt this is the only mechanism driving brain size to increase and there are definitely a plethora of danger in africa that are not present in europe. Even then the most dominant species of hominid rose from africa. We evolved there, have you ever seen the show Naked-and-afraid? It’s kind of humorous they’ll send a pair of white(usually) people into a tropical climate and they have about 3 weeks to make it. They almost always come out starving and broken and these are people who are a very experienced with hunter gathering techniques and have practiced in their backyards(figuratively) for years. It’s actually much harder to catch protein rich food in a tropical climate than you would think.
Pumpkin person,
“colder climates did indeed require more intelligence because remember, primates were already well adapted to Africa, having lived their for millions of years. Cold climates required new innovations to survive.”
Congratulations!!
I already had thought about it in the RaceRealist blog but not in this simple and correct sentence.
But i think different species tend to have different worst and best (or less worst) environments to live (doctor obvious attacks again), even we can observe the little % of species who are adapted to the cold environment than in the exuberant tropical scenarios.
Also we need to think about great non-human predators because there is a argument that in the african savannah and forests humans had to deal with more them than in colder areas.
But what i have ”researched”, very few great predators are human-meat lovers, so…
they only attack humans if they feel fear or if they are hungry.
Of course the further north you go you will get bigger heads. The population size they have doesn’t allow for many advantageous alleles to be selected for. The same holds for the Inuit. As well as, as you said, ‘Natives’ being descended from Siberians.
Actually, a new paper supports the theory:
Jared Diamond says things along these same lines. So does Robert Sternberg.
People must need analyse bigger brains and behavioral patterns, if it have.
old physiognomy correlate forehead size and behavior.
iq also seems tend to correlates with degree of self-domestication.
“Of course the further north you go you will get bigger heads. The population size they have doesn’t allow for many advantageous alleles to be selected for. The same holds for the Inuit. As well as, as you said, ‘Natives’ being descended from Siberians.
I’m not sure if you understood my point. Native americans already had their large brains when they got here so it wasn’t a matter of generating the right mutations since they were already equipped with the proper brain capacity to survive in colder climates.
“Actually, a new paper supports the theory:”
Ok well according to your paper then if eurasia is a tougher environment then europeans should have a fast life history but this isn’t true at all. So If what this paper says is correct then africa should technically be a more harsh place to survive than eurasia, which would debunk the idea that “Europeans have more intelligent because europe is a harder place to live in.”
“Jared Diamond says things along these same lines. So does Robert Sternberg.”
What do they say specifically?
the bottleneck mutation is of course the better theory….
the notion that “mutations spread rapidly over Eurasia” is improbable because if you die you die in the harsh winter “spreading mutations” are not needed.
Exactly.^
Greater populations can implies more competition…
competition may increase speed of the ‘evolution’.
just look to the capitalist and communist Germany, or better, all advanced capitalist countries and all advanced [former] communist countries.
Competition cause increase of the quality of the products = former Western Germany.
Non-competition, by now, decrease the necessity of constant improving of the products that are being offered in the market = Eastern Germany (trabant**)
There are possible examples proving this theory like amish, inuit, south american hunter gatherers, sami, all of them are little groups and they have evolved, seems, little. But all of them avoid direct-to-any contact with their ”civilized’ neighbors.
In other hand, other little groups, when located inside greater and complex societies as jews, parsees and christian arabs have evolved cognitively even in the higher ‘quality’ than their outsider sorrounded neighbors.
Put your group in the city and your guys will have to adapt (select) to this new environment or die.
Civilizations cause changes in the selective criteria to the best fitness.
A hunter gatherers need to be strong and ”smart-street” or better, ”smart-forest”.
First, civilizations increase diversity of types, or
diversification of types [psycho cognitive specialization] already cause the social ”jump” or ”civilization/rampant inequality”…
in the same way a evolution of human communication (via brain evolution) emerge the necessity to invent a language.
i mean, a certain population increase their avg intelligence(s) and the increase of the population tend to implies in increase of genetic diversity, variety and variability.
Stable environments tend to promove increase of bio-diversity.
civilization is a maximization of the collective work to be relocated to the elites hands, while there are a shared self-subsistence-work in hunter gatherers communities, on avg.
Environment select, natural AND anthropormophized / anthropomorphic.
bigger heads (brachycephalic) among mongoloid human race can be ”just” a mongoloid feature, of course, is likely that have some function to the mongoloid psycho-cognition.
Interestingly neanderthals don’t *seems* were brachycephalic and today many-to-most of east asians are brachy.
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090212083508AAHBcHa
by mathematic obvious reasons is comparative easy spread certain advantageous or not mutation within little than greater groups.
“Greater populations can implies more competition…
competition may increase speed of the ‘evolution’.
just look to the capitalist and communist Germany, or better, all advanced capitalist countries and all advanced [former] communist countries.”
We were not capitalist societies tens of thousands of years ago. The main driver of archaic technology was necessity: http://www.evoanth.net/2016/04/26/technology-evolve-not-population-size/
“bigger heads (brachycephalic) among mongoloid human race can be ”just” a mongoloid feature, of course, is likely that have some function to the mongoloid psycho-cognition.
Interestingly neanderthals don’t *seems* were brachycephalic and today many-to-most of east asians are brachy.”
Neanderthals still had larger brains on average than homo sapiens at the time and some even speculate their odd facial features were due to genetic drift and not natural selection by the cold. The more elongated shape of the neanderthal skull is possibly caused by the enlarged visual cortex ear the back of the brain which is useful in areas with lower levels of light. This also includes larger orbital sockets which may even be the reason for their smaller frontal cortex.
http://www.evoanth.net/2015/08/18/neanderthals-didnt-evolve/
“Greater populations can implies more competition…
competition may increase speed of the ‘evolution’.
just look to the capitalist and communist Germany, or better, all advanced capitalist countries and all advanced [former] communist countries.”
We were not capitalist societies tens of thousands of years ago. The main driver of archaic technology was necessity: http://www.evoanth.net/2016/04/26/technology-evolve-not-population-size/
“bigger heads (brachycephalic) among mongoloid human race can be ”just” a mongoloid feature, of course, is likely that have some function to the mongoloid psycho-cognition.
Interestingly neanderthals don’t *seems* were brachycephalic and today many-to-most of east asians are brachy.”
Neanderthals still had larger brains on average than homo-sapiens at the time and some even speculate their odd facial features were due to genetic drift and not natural selection by the cold. The more elongated shape of the neanderthal skull is possibly caused by the enlarged visual cortex near the back of the brain which is useful in areas with lower levels of light. This also includes larger orbital sockets which may even be the reason for their smaller frontal cortex.
http://www.evoanth.net/2015/08/18/neanderthals-didnt-evolve/
fucking moderation -___-
“Greater populations can implies more competition…
competition may increase speed of the ‘evolution’.
just look to the capitalist and communist countries.”
We were not capitalist societies tens of thousands of years ago. The main driver of archaic technology was necessity: http://www.evoanth.net/2016/04/26/technology-evolve-not-population-size/
“Interestingly neanderthals don’t *seems* were brachycephalic and today many-to-most of east asians are brachy.”
Neanderthals still had larger brains on average than humans at the time and some even speculate their odd facial features were due to genetic drift and not natural selection by the cold. The more elongated shape of the neanderthal skull is possibly caused by the enlarged visual cortex near the back of the brain which is useful in areas with lower levels of light. This also includes larger orbital sockets which may even be the reason for their smaller frontal cortex.
http://www.evoanth.net/2015/08/18/neanderthals-didnt-evolve/
I think it’s the links…I don’t even care anymore.
“by mathematic obvious reasons is comparative easy spread certain advantageous or not mutation within little than greater groups.”
It takes time to spread, especially through breeding.
By definition winter< 9 months of child gestation, especially when not spreading across the land.
HBDers are wrong about SE Asians AND probably most Native Americans/Hispanics.
SE Asians carved steps out of the side of hills to maximize space to farm- allowing for their population to grow (half of the world’s population lives within a thousand mile radius centered in Myanmar- they are the future), and must have been smart. They are just about as smart as Euros not “slightly less intelligent” like pp believes (he believes an 0.2 SD difference)….in the world pop. link.
and Native Americans- for the reasons we expressed above;
https://pumpkinperson.com/2016/02/17/were-native-americans-too-smart-to-be-slaves/
”It takes time to spread, especially through breeding.
By definition winter< 9 months of child gestation, especially when not spreading across the land.''
This is not a argument against ''my'' statement. I'm talking about long term.
”We were not capitalist societies tens of thousands of years ago. The main driver of archaic technology was necessity: http://www.evoanth.net/2016/04/26/technology-evolve-not-population-size/”
It was a metaphor…
i mean, higher demographic density is better to create competition and increase the speed of the evolution than in sparsely populated areas where populations tend to adapt specially to the environment and sustain their current evolutionary approach.
greater populations also can mean greater genetic diversity.
”Neanderthals still had larger brains on average than homo sapiens at the time and some even speculate their odd facial features were due to genetic drift and not natural selection by the cold.”
Yes, i know.
”The more elongated shape of the neanderthal skull is possibly caused by the enlarged visual cortex ear the back of the brain which is useful in areas with lower levels of light. This also includes larger orbital sockets which may even be the reason for their smaller frontal cortex.
http://www.evoanth.net/2015/08/18/neanderthals-didnt-evolve/”
yes, i also know that.
?
In the long term, if it happens, it happens (they die) versus breeding…which would imply that that if the traits for a North (or far southern) climate on land spread..it would eventually not be latitude dependent.
So……
I’m not talking about latitude, i’m talking about demographic density.
I don’t understand your comment.
”The main driver of archaic technology was necessity”
necessity ~ competition
competition is one of the most common criteria to the necessity.
you don’t need compete with other but with yourself.
Pumpkin person,
“Instead of being given math problems and vocabulary questions, we should be given someone else to control every minute of the day, perhaps though virtual reality, and the better job we do in telling that person or animal how to reach his specific goals, the higher our score.”
You mean..video games? What you are describing is video games. If you believe this to truly be a measurement of adaptability or what you think is “intelligence” I could almost guarantee I would score higher than most people on this blog. My PS3 inbox is filled with hate mail.
I’m describing virtual reality that simulated real life, so you could experience what it’s like to be a cat for a week, or a pygmy living in Africa for a week, or an arctic person for a week, or a Jewish lawyer in New York city for a week, an alien on a completely different planet with different gravity for a week and you had to adapt all those different kinds of situations. You would get a score for how well you adapted to each situation, and the higher the average score, the higher the IQ you’d be assigned.
I’m not talking about the typical video game which is all about spatial talent and reaction time, because that’s just one kind of situation out of an infinite variety.
https://pumpkinperson.com/2016/06/27/pumpkin-person-buys-the-british-pound/#comment-28504
Pumpkin Person: The better question is if you were to put a scrawny Jewish kid’s brain into the body of a kid who would grow up to be sub-Saharan adult, could he adapt to that World, because when I say “turn the situation to your advantage”, I’m including one’s physical situation.
I would be weird to be in a cat body because my brain is bigger than a cat skull. But if you had a brain machine interface where you controlled the cat body via telepathy then that would work out in that different intelligence levels would control the cat body to accomplish cat like goals.
Pumpkin Person: But since general IQ is at least slightly useful in every environment, and musical IQ is virtually only useful in musical environments, over billions of years of trial and error, evolution will favour general IQ in the long run.
My brother is a technical genius. He can play games where he shits through everything in his inventory to solve problems in the game. Games have objects (tools) and he can manipulate the game world to his advantage. The reason I do not play video games is because I have low dexterity. The only games I am good at involve theory of mind and whole body kinesthetics (Nintendo Wii). When I play Star Wars games I can completely shift my character to the light or dark side because I mentally understand the minds of Sith and Jedi. My brother cannot shift his character to the light or dark side. He just goes through every option by resetting the game when he fails. And he remembers what each tool does that he can boost his character’s skills (super powerful lightsaber). What limits him is that only by negotiation can you unlock force powers. His tools unlock the power to kill bad guys and gain more tools but I gain experience from people interactions which allows me to unlock the force that I then kill bad guys with. If you have no powers or tools then the people and monsters kill you. On the Nintendo I can navigate Wii puzzle games because I look for divergent ways of solving problems with my body (Wiimote). My brother only uses one tool to solve every problem if it works. I will use different tools just to see if they can work even on the same problem. In one Wii game I played you had tellicanethis. You could move any object in any way you wanted to so I spent lots of time looking for the most unique way to solve each problem. My brother did each level the exact same way. I am really good at open ended games. I can’t play games that require precision and speed at the same time. I am really precise (bodily kinesthetic) yet really slow. Tools and bodies can be used in more than one way. My incentive structure is different than others. I must decide the goal I want and I must decide how to achieve that goal. I am addicted to novelty.
Self Control
Impulse Control
Delayed Gratification
Self Awareness
Self Reflection
Mental Adaptation works because you perceive the direction future events can take place (causality). You have modeled the environment and the consequences of your actions. And you have taken into account uncertainty and probability. Learning from your mistakes and overcompensation. Self model, metacognition. Your mind becomes silent and Intuition takes over. The subconscious becomes a receiver and transmitter. Some brains are smart because they can perceive more because they build environmental models and self models faster than others. The more accurate you can project internal and external reality, the more control over it you will have.
Pretend your body is a video game character you control. This will make you smarter. Self Observation and incremental adjustments. A quiet mind.
btw,
Farel kids can’t do this.
shifts*
but very few people are like that
listen
we aren’t talking about super-mega-ultra-master-plus malabarisms but simple attitudes. Looking to the behavior of MOST people included the (((ones))) that Peepee over-value i concluded that what make some rational and other, most of other, very less rational is just a fine but strong line.
Even if video games are more about spatial talent and reaction time you’re still using problem solving techniques and pattern recognition especially in puzzle games like God of War. You still have to adapt to the games mechanics.
I would be weird to be in a cat body because my brain is bigger than a cat skull. But if you had a brain machine interface where you controlled the cat body via telepathy then that would work out in that different intelligence levels would control the cat body to accomplish cat like goals.
Exactly
i see what you’re saying but it’s the same concept is it not? I mean in an rpg fantasy game like Dark souls or Skyrim you get to choose out of many races and classes which all have starting stat bonuses and then you must trek your way through an incredibly detailed world to gain power and knowledge over your surroundings. You’re adapting to a world that is not your own in a body that is not your own.
Sounds fascinating. I will have to check it out.
Pumpkin gonna Peepee,
”As I’ve said a hundred times before”
Checked, hundred and hundred times…
”and will say a hundred times again”
You’re trying to lobomotize us***
(((other)))
ok, ok
” perhaps the single umbrella that covers all of intelligence is the ability to adapt: to take whatever situation you’re in and turn it around to your advantage.”
Thousand times…
”But what does that really mean?”
ability to adapt = ability to adapt
😉
”More precisely, I define intelligence as the brain’s capacity for behavioral adaptability, which I define as:
”Behavioral adaptability is the brain’s ability to use whatever body it’s in as a tool to use whatever environment it’s in as a tool to minimize the cost-benefit ratio of whatever incentive structure it has.”
Do you know that, because the quasi-comparative-benevolence of human environments, many different types of humans can ”adapt”** conform** (or not)
It’s like ”many different types of lizards adapting in certain environment because their higher overall stability, specially to the females”
So, based on this conception
behavior = intelligence
every behavior is itself potentially adaptable but it depend environment and their exponentially perfect fit-ness.
”So there are many reasons why the correlation between intelligence and success would be far from perfect.”
”Different people have different bodies.”
huuuum…
”Two people with equal intelligence could differ enormously in physical attractiveness or athletic talent, and that could mean the difference between extreme wealth and poverty.”
huuumm…
”Different people could have different environments. One man is born to a family of investment bankers while another man is born in rural poverty. The former will likely be much more successful even if the latter is much more intelligent.”
huuum…
random environmental ”organization” = lucky
planned environmental organization = meritocracy
”Different people have different incentive structures.”
huuuum…
I’s going well…
” One man’s idea of success could be raking in millions as a CEO, while another man’s idea of success could be sleeping in everyday until noon and then watching TV the rest of the day.”
yeees… specially because creative ideas don’t obey super-social structure.
”Given that life is such an unlevel playing field, and then on top of that, success can be defined in so many ways, it is truly remarkable that the correlation between IQ and money is as high as it is. This strongly suggests IQ really is measuring behavioral adaptability.”
Really***
”behavioral adaptability”, give me examples…
if iq correlates with [more] implicit anti-social personalities ….
again,
still hundred times,
Cognition is like the physiological traits of the brain and peripherical nervous system, like the robot and their circuits.
Intelligence is the behavior based on this physiological traits,
shape and expression
”Given that life is such an unlevel playing field, and then on top of that, success can be defined in so many ways, it is truly remarkable that the correlation between IQ and money is as high as it is”
Contradictions there if ”success” can be defined in so many ways, money is just one of them,
and correlates with iq, why**
because ”our” societies are materialist.
masses are not just avg and below-avg people, Peepee.
Is not just that you can score higher in cognitive tests that you become mechanically a ”non-masse” person.
http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/06/28/its-time-for-the-elites-to-rise-up-against-ignorant-masses-trump-2016-brexit/
idiotic ANjooLS call themselves as ”sane”…
unfortunatelly
no hollycaust by now,
=(
oops…
working and middle classes were betrayed…
who are the traitors *
ANjooLS are sooooooooooooooooooooooooo smarrrty
And a lot of people with less cognitive skills can be a non-massified people.
”lobomotize”
I know you understand it, 😉
lol
LOL at the cartoon. Can’t believe white nationalists have co-opted the idea of Master Blaster
behavior = intelligence
I wouldn’t say intelligence = behavior, but intelligence might be the part of the brain that generates and decides the behavior, based on what the organism wants at that moment in time.
So the body is the slave to the intelligence and the intelligence is the slave to the emotions (though emotions are also influenced by intelligence)
That was Ben “Three Reichs and You’re Out” Garrison who drew thay cartoon.
why can’t you believe that?
It fits their mantras quite well.
racerealist-
1. Is Ben Garrison a real person?
2. If so, is Ben Garrison actually a WN or a Nazi?
those cartoons are hoaxes https://grrrgraphics.wordpress.com/tag/ben-garrison-fake-cartoons/
“We need more Asians, and North Europeans (British isles people/Anglos) excluded.”
no, we don’t need any more people.
certainly not any that will make the US population more heterogeneous than it is now.
Actually the cartoon does have a grain of truth. However, America’s social dynamics have changed dramatically over the past decade, because of the large influx of Hispanic and Asian immigrants, which have finally come to the forefront. This have somewhat clouded the black-White and Jewish interrelationship. Many Whites, those of whom Lion’s followers call “proles” have been replaced by Hispanics and to a certain extent Asians, when it comes to jobs and schools. blacks are also experiencing the same grievance. I’m also thinking that a growing number of less successful Ashkenazi Jews, might feel a pinch of here and there, because they are feeling displaced.
Furthermore, the world has become more globalized, and yet America still shields itself with a bubble.
Santo has so much evidence, while me and MeLo have absolutely none……………
how foolish of us for not realizing.
P.S.
*YOU’RE BLACK BY AMERICAN STANDARDS*
And***
i’m universalist thinker, you pretend to be…
you said that american proles are stupid
so why i should care about ”american standards”**
and, be mixed have its potential advantages… 😉
as a natural mediator.
of course, if you have intelligence to use it correctly.
dude, you’re not smart.
I’m saying that you would not benefit from Ameriprole standards therefore YOU should not like them…my personal opinions regarding that are irrelevant.
you’re a bizarre moron, nothing that you said here is credible, just idiocy.
but as happen with almost of the incredibly stupid people, you no have even a drope of the self-awareness to know about yourself, your trash stupidities you’re innocently exposing here because you think your arguments are the best.
again, i don’t want waste my time with trash as you and your boy-spergy friend…
and i will not go.
it’s explain why you hate eugenics, because it work directly against you.
The fundamental question here is:
i don’t care about american racial standards.
I no have any will to immigrate to the USA, specially now. The whole world is coming to the New Rome, i want to go to the otherwise direction.
Yup, your personal opinions are absolutely irrelevant, wrong and poor developed.
so why you insist on exposing them**
you’re so damn retarded as usual to the incredibly stupid that you don’t have a good internal contradictions detector, you fall down in contradictions and don’t note this.
your defition of smart is clever or astute, someone who act dishonestly against other people to take advantages.
my best benefit would they, the ”american proles”, there, in their country, developing the western civilization and i here, in the meridional hemisphere, receiving indirectly these achievements [and of course, moral achievements, the fundamental of all).
I hate to be petty or a douchebag in general, but Santo claims meLo and I are the ones who are overly emotional and have no evidence/arguments when we are debating him.
His “evidence” is Ben Garrison, while we’ve provided studies, or simplified results of studies.
His thought process is generally illogical and flawed, he relies more on emotion……
https://pumpkinperson.com/2015/06/02/brazilian-hybrid-goes-on-bizarre-rant-against-me/#comment-12654
quite accurate of a comment.
“brazilian hybrid” lmfao I’m geeking out! XD
he says he is “between 2 or 3% and 10% Black” which averages out to about 6.25% or 1/16…….
some WNs would accept him as White, others would not.
he says it’s about “justice” but is it primitive protection of EGIs or “justice”…can’t have it both ways.
Also,
he could be under-exaggerating his Blackeness, or have Amerindian blood.
The Alt-Left mainly stuff from Robert Lindsay and some of my ideas/interpretations:
1. Using “IQ testing” (or some related theme- head measurements, median head measurements of people in the region one is from, or educational achievement) for Latin American immigration- keep the rest the way it is.
2. Stop the media from erasing American history- yes the founders were mostly racist, but it was Europeans who founded this nation (BUT none of that “Anglo values” stuff, last time I checked a “Greco-Roman” democracy in a land first settled by Iberians does not translate to “Anglo”- we also consider the achievements of other Caucasians- such as the Syrians/Lebanese who are similar to us, or the East Indians- who paved the way for European civilization, they are fully, 100% accepted with us), basically, stop tearing down statues of founders, confederates, etc. There’s nothing wrong with being Caucasian, in and of itself.
3. Bernie-Sanderesque policy on economics.
4. A less direct democracy (the American people are “prole and shitty” and are fucking up, may not even be capable of democracy).
5. An obligation to the poor, even the non-Whites, who the poor are disproportiantly, we don’t use Black problems as a cover for White nationalism, we don’t “push a cripple into a gutter”
forgot Persians, as well.
“he says he is “between 2 or 3% and 10% Black” which averages out to about 6.25% or 1/16…….
some WNs would accept him as White, others would not.
he says it’s about “justice” but is it primitive protection of EGIs or “justice”…can’t have it both ways.”
what else is he? just white and 1/16th black? If so he is basically white and the fact that WN’s would not include him in their “ranks” is reflective of their lack in intelligence. If he is more non white than he is probably a self hating NAM
“Stop the media from erasing American history- yes the founders were mostly racist, but it was Europeans who founded this nation ”
America is a country that should not exist. As an amateur anthropologist it pisses me of tremendously that native americans were not allowed to see their full potential Just imagine the amazing culture they would have had. But you can’t change the past.
yes, it was a nasty thing what happened to them, and there’s no need for Whites like Mann and the klan to be dickish about that…
but….
there still needs to be SOME positive feelings about our nation’s past.
I’m not going to front, if america didn’t exist then I probably wouldn’t be here and that sucks. Good reactions can come from bad situations and vice versa. However, I still feel that means I am prioritizing mine and other’s lives over millions that could have existed.
It’s a bummer because that had brain sizes similar to europeans so it’s very possible they would have had some kind of modern civilization if their culture had been allowed to prosper.
4. A less direct democracy (the American people are “prole and shitty” and are fucking up, may not even be capable of democracy).
what else then?
i’ll take a direct democracy over a republic every fucking day.
one where Jews are forbidden to be in the oligarchy 🙂
Just kidding…………….
but seriously, guy, you realize a lot of the problems we face today were by the Congress, not the executive branch, which means the people are more directly responsible for this.
Even so, electing Presidents who fucked the country to hell, like Regan causing the country to be top heavy, good in the short term but unsustainable in the long term……….
the American people fucked this up.
We need more Asians, and North Europeans (British isles people/Anglos) excluded.
I agree with Nixon that these people have the most capacity for government..(Jews do to, but they look at for their own- the rich, who are disproportionally them)
9:57- onward
*too*
Autistic/retarded and the bizarre another joke
Infallible couple
😋
Lmao@ santo proving our point!
just in their delirium.
“4. A less direct democracy (the American people are “prole and shitty” and are fucking up, may not even be capable of democracy).”
What’s your alternative?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/papua-new-guinea-sexual-violence_us_56d9fca1e4b0ffe6f8e974f2
that old white guy is ugly as fuck. I guess a little prognathism is more attractive. at least in my opinion
so Rove and Cheney are the ‘masters’ and Bush is the ‘blaster’
Is there an inner race or ethnic correlation with this type of thing (r/k selectivity)?, because it seems like Meds are generally more charismatic than Nordics- these Latin American dictators often times have strong personalities- versus the more boring Nordic politicians.
http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/after-brexit-academics-need-to-get-out-more/18513#.V3U04_krLIX
Peepee call it ”intelligence = adapt the situation to yourself”
but how**
Britain was less violent, less populated, less dangerous, fundamentally during the XX century, than now…
Peepee seems think that to ”adapt” only can mean ”to act expansively”, but not, ”avoid” or ”reset” is also a type of ”smart” behavior and avoid mass immigration/invasion is one of this obvious smart behavior…
i’m not against ”globalization” if it is done intelligently, but that is not happening, because the intentions are (((others)))
If Europe and USA are being destroyed it’s not the fundamental guilt of the ”masses” but especially because their so-called ”cognitive elites”.
“[…] With regard to the fact that Tibetans have preserved, throughout history, ethnic, cultural and religious identity, the Bundestag (German parliament) condemns the policy of the Chinese authorities, because it results in relation to Tibet, the destruction of identity of Tibetans, mainly through settlement and immigration of Chinese in large numbers, forced abortion, political, religious and cultural persecution, and submission of the country to the control of the Chinese administration. […]
The Bundesregierung (German government) demands and strives enough for … the Chinese government to cease any action that leads to the destruction of Tibetan culture, such as the systematic construction of Chinese colonies in large numbers, thereby repressing the Tibetan population, and persecution representatives of Tibetan culture … ”
https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/european-union-referendum-nine-out-of-ten-university-staff-back-remain
http://intjforum.com/showthread.php?t=25935
http://thoughtcatalog.com/daniel-hayes/2015/06/20-reasons-why-the-world-is-full-of-dumb-people-who-think-theyre-smart/
huuuuuummm
http://thoughtcatalog.com/daniel-hayes/2016/06/here-are-all-the-people-making-up-conspiracy-theories-about-orlando-to-justify-why-gun-laws-shouldnt-change/
Huum, sad mister Hayes is just other people who think are extremely smart…
was a self-description
raigher (not in Belluzzo, please) intra- personal ”intelligence”
but lack (((detector)))) skills
so sad