This week Hillary scored perhaps her most important endorsement yet: Oprah’s. This is also significant because Donald Trump is a HUGE Oprah fan, and has been wanting her to run as his Vice President for almost 20 years. In 1999, he said :
I love Oprah. Oprah would always be my first choice…You know what? She really is a great woman, though, she is a terrific woman. She is somebody that’s very special…If she’d do it, she’d be fantastic…She’s popular, she’s brilliant, she’s a wonderful woman. I mean, if she’d ever do it, I don’t know that she’d ever do it.
In 2015, Trump continued to gush over Oprah:
I like Oprah—what can I tell you? She’s great, she’s talented, she’s a good person. In fact, I was on her show [her] last week…I like Oprah, is that supposed to be a bad thing? I think Oprah would be great. I think we’d win easily, actually
However Oprah shrewdly dismisses such praise as Trump joking around, even though she must know he was serious.
Now that Oprah has retired from hosting the #1 talk show in America, she might enjoy all the attention that comes with being on a presidential ticket, but being Trump’s VP would be too risky. Not only would she damage her friendship with the Obamas, but she would anger women and minorities who a are a huge part of her base. It’s much wiser to side with Hillary.
Having already put a black couple in the White house, Oprah might as well complete her legacy by helping to elect the first woman President. Indeed it’s a testament to Oprah’s influence that when she first started dominating the media in 1986, Reagan was President, and by the time she stepped down, we had a black President who is expected to be followed by a female one.
Oprah’s stratospheric cranial capacity allows her to understand that ultimately we are judged not just by our own accomplishments, but by how many we can give a helping hand to along the way.
I’ll never forget the time Hillary appeared on Oprah’s talk show when she was First Lady. At the time it was considered a big deal for a First Lady to appear on a daytime talk show because in those days, the Presidency was more prestigious and daytime talk shows were considered trash TV. But despite this, Oprah was such an icon that she was clearly the dominant figure in the interaction, as evidenced by her putting her arm around Hillary like a school teacher would to a little girl:
Pumpkin Person 
35:38-36:05.
Correlation between adult parent IQ and offspring IQ appears to be stronger as time goes on- what I would assume is genes responding to environment, in similar ways.
Appears to be a blow to P=G+E
I also take back the negative things I said about Stefan 🙂
If Oprah was Trump’s VP,
she will have to confront MANY hecklers at his rallies about the “monkey business”.
If Trump gets elected Oprah will be sent to West Africa….
is this what you want, ‘Peepee’?
I guarantee that wouldn’t happen
probably not.
BUT
we still have to be careful.
These Alt-Right types DON’T know what they want- which is dangerous, in and of itself (when merged with their hysteria)
and they honestly don’t
“protect our culture”
“protect our race”
“protect our countries”
what, specifically does that mean?
Anywhere from- deport a few illegals TO
deport all non-Whites to KILL all non-Whites.
Well, it’s hard to tell
IF the especially nasty Alt-Righters are actually just losers in their mom’s basement- no chance.
Otherwise- may be trouble.
Commenter Bucephelas used to say you were Black………
I take it that’s not true?
you’re not a cynic.
I can’t wait for the Ben Shapiro vs. Milo Yiannopolous debate.
You should do a post on their IQs prior to the debate- if you don’t mind….
cynics deficate in public
“cynics deficate in public”
…..What?
Pumpkin you should do the IQ of Genghis khan.
Every day is a birthday for 43,000 of his descendants. Had the biggest empire ever.
AK- I thought they lived in trash cans?
lol
pp guaranteed the Holocaust wouldn’t happen.
Oprah is a “third world savage”.
I can’t wait for the Ben Shapiro vs. Milo Yiannopolous debate.
You should do a post on their IQs prior to the debate- if you don’t mind….
I’ll definitely post about Shapiro’s IQ since I’ve been wondering about his intelligence since 2003.
pp guaranteed the holocaust wouldn’t happen.
pp is unaware that Oprah is just a “third world savage”. No matter what she accomplishes.
pp and most bloggers don’t get the level to which this is a cover.
Gottfredsen has evidence that Genes respond to the environment (because the IQ correlation between parents and children gets unexpectedly higher as opposed to lower, over time)………..which challenges P=G+E. But no hardcore HBDers say anything.
It’s because P=G+E means that even smart “savages” are to be left in third world squalor because with this model IQs regress to the mean in a somewhat strong manner (depending on the correlation strength).
“No new N!ggers in the U.S. view is now called as bullshit”
thanks pp.
I also suggest you read stormfront, Daily Stormer, even AmRen, Donald Trump’s facebook page, Breitbart, and many others before you say I “guarantee” that won’t happen.
Oprah may be okay because she hasn’t done anything.
But Ben Shapiro,
he might be kidnapped from his House BEFORE the Trumpkins take over and sent to the ovens.
Grim future
pp is unaware that Oprah is just a “third world savage”. No matter what she accomplishes.
I’m well aware that she is viewed that way by many, which I credit her large brain for adapting to a hostile environment.
pp and most bloggers don’t get the level to which this is a cover.
Gottfredsen has evidence that Genes respond to the environment (because the IQ correlation between parents and children gets unexpectedly higher as opposed to lower, over time)………..which challenges P=G+E. But no hardcore HBDers say anything.
HBDers are well aware of that. Jensen wrote about it back in the 1990s.
It’s because P=G+E means that even smart “savages” are to be left in third world squalor because with this model IQs regress to the mean in a somewhat strong manner (depending on the correlation strength).
No, the P = G + E model implies all races benefit from First World living conditions. It’s actually those who critique P = G + E who argue races belong in their home countries because different genes benefit from different environments.
yes, pp, but by “benefiting from first world living conditions” you mean Black IQs going from 70 to 80, not going to White levels.
With P= GxE it appears that the people who have had success in the third world due to their genes- will pass on their genes to their children and have their IQs rise FURTHER in the 1st world because their genes will Perhaps respond even more favorably to 1st world conditions.
I’m a noob at this so correct me if anything is blatantly wrong…
If an African immigrant with a 120 IQ migrates here- his children’s IQs would simply do the regression of 80+50(0.5)= 105 (cause his IQ would be 10 points higher) rather than in their home country 70 + 50(0.5)= 95
with P= G+E.
P= G+E still believes IQs regress to the low “Genetic” medians….even if it is higher than third world elites.
“No, the P = G + E model implies all races benefit from First World living conditions. It’s actually those who critique P = G + E who argue races belong in their home countries because different genes benefit from different environments.”
but if it’s an AfricanT who has an IQ vastly abnormal to his people- why do we think he’s best suited on the R-K selectivity continuum for Tropical Africa?
They’re grasping at straws…
yes, pp, but by “benefiting from first world living conditions” you mean Black IQs going from 70 to 80, not going to White levels.
I think it’s more like 64 to 80-86, but your point still stands.
With P= GxE it appears that the people who have had success in the third world due to their genes- will pass on their genes to their children and have their IQs rise FURTHER in the 1st world because their genes will Perhaps respond even more favorably to 1st world conditions
Yes, that’s possible, but P= GxE proponents have argued that one’s genes will be most likely to benefit from a culture built by their own kind.
The P = G + E model seems useful when talking about groups.
For example, the black-white IQ gap of blacks and whites has remained about 15 points since WWI, despite the fact that environment has improved the IQ of both groups by 30 points.
If the P = GxE model were right at the group level, we’d expect the gap to change or even reverse.
She so smart
So good person
Is not Pumpkin???
This was a splendid analysis as always
You’re convincing me about her.
She’s inspired
In terms of their likely impact on Blacks, Hillary Clinton (gibs for Blacks and neocons aka Jewish nationalists) is by far the best candidate, followed by Trump (who will help them by restricting immigration i.e. Latino competitors) and then Sanders (gibs for everyone means much fewer gibs for Blacks in particular). However, Trump comes with a big downside risk, namely that he actually is Alt Right instead of someone who just panders to them every so often.
As such, it is of no surprise that Oprah, a clearly ethnocentric Black, would endorse Hillary.
My sense is that high IQ Jews don’t like Trump, despite the fact that he claims to be very pro-Israel and has Jewish grandkids. I think they don’t like his supporters and find his foreign policy too unpredictable.
Perhaps his support for Putin is also a turn off for a lot of Jews?
No he isn’t.
Playfair why do you post 100 comments per day?
Why do you not?
lol.
I’m in college, and out for summer break- I only work during the School year.
I’ve got some free time.
I would still like to respectfully remind you that I post less than Santoculto or Mugabe used to.
my content largely falls flat with this blog.
It works better on more politically oriented, and left leaning blogs.
I post because Syrians are largely genetically indistinguishable from Europeans (as I have posted links regarding to many times)- yet they are genoiciding the White race somehow.
I have also stated are we sure that Amerinds are so dumb, as Mongoloids with great diversity- often times European-sized Brains?
That’s not addressed because it’s not politically expedient.
I am 100% European, according to extrapolated results of my DNA test (rare for someone with a Latin American father)-
but am just questioning these mantras.
my father was born here- but his parents weren’t…to clarify….
“I post because Syrians are largely genetically indistinguishable from Europeans”
maybe if you’re comparing them to southeast europeans.
and even then, you would be wrong.
ethnicity is as much about self-identification and perception as it is about genes…maybe moreso.
Syrians are very obviously different from Swedes.
the french are very obviously different from the germans…and not as much as syrians are from europeans in general.
does this mean that 50 million ethnic snail-eaters flooding krautland would be genetically and socially irrelevant?
no!
though…i will agree that “white genocide” is stupid. maybe.
“the french are very obviously different from the germans…and not as much as syrians are from europeans in general.”
Culturally, absolutely. But genetically, if you saw a North French and a German on the street you couldn’t say which is which.
I swear I saw this guy on Jersey shore!
Look at the Rushton article’s comments for my empirical sources.
Yes, culture, whatever, but in terms of pure genetics, the facts are the facts.
I.E.,
I saw this guy on Jersey shore!
See the Rushton article for empirical sources.
I have an abscess….
I may have to have surgery…
if a Jewish doctor does it and messes up, I’ll have to change my tune.
But once I’m up and running I’ll be posting far less here, for a time.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-17/first-brexit-poll-after-jo-cox-death-reveals-stunning-result
I wonder how big Clinton’s head is? not as big as Oprah’s probably
There’s no comparison. Not even her husband’s head is anywhere near as big as Oprah’s.
TRUE
it is larger
I was talking about Hillary’s husband, not Oprah’s boyfriend. Steadman might have a taller cranium than Oprah, but Oprah has a much, much longer one.
Nobody has a longer head than Oprah, unless they have some kind of pathology.
Her head is 25.25″ around, which is about as big as non-pathological head size ever goes.
Gene Siskel’s hat maker thought he was hallucinating. He couldn’t believe a human head could be that big.
fat people tend to have bigger heads*
Pumpkin,
you already can open a Oprah’s head photo session,
what do you think*
Quote of the day
”Nobody has a longer head than Oprah, unless they have some kind of pathology.”
– Pumpkin Person
generally big forehead tend to correlates with big head, is not*
When I was a kid, my classmates made fun of me for having a big head. Would have been cool if I had an HBD teacher or uncle pull me aside and assure me.
I have a huge head too, but nobody made fun of me because I’d beat the FUCKING shit out of them. Caesarean birth. Glad I put my cunt of a mom through that shit.
I went from big head to giving good head. I’m a FUCKING hooker part-time, but a very pick one. Most of the guys who approach me, I tell them to fuck off.
Calm the fuck down yo
cool
Pumpkin has the biggest hard on for Oprah.
i’m still trying to see where that Oprah have this super bigger head that Pumpkin over-emphasise
http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/pubpym/picture76556712/ALTERNATES/FREE_640/Unz
Hillary’s head didnt look THAT much smaller than oprahs.
Pumpkin
Explain this
Sailer seems have little head if compared with Oprah
What it mean Pumpkin??
You can see how huge her head is here:
Her head circumference has been measured and it’s way off the charts. So big her hats have to be custom made and two wigs had to be sewn together to fit her head.
This has been confirmed by Oprah herself and by the late film critic Gene Siskel who went shopping for cowboy hats with her. Apparently the hat maker, who had made hats for decades, was in shock at how big Oprah’s head is.
“off the charts”
it’s above-average…at most. my mother’s head may be longer, actually…and she’s a high midwit at most.
she’s not the melonheaded goody genius peepee thinks she is.
I recall mugabe asking what the difference between oprah, her ilk, and el chapo/some other drug dealer is.
of course, he said none.
and of course, no-one pointed any out.
because there are none.
She’s so ugly.
what the difference between oprah, her ilk, and el chapo/some other drug dealer is.
Oprah (depending on your perspective) had a much more positive effect on the World and acquired her wealth and influence in a much more high status and cognitively demanding field.
But el chapo is probably very smart for a Mexican criminal, but what makes Oprah so uniquely fascinating is she has both a stratospheric brain size AND a stratospheric bank account. El Chapo only has the latter.
Oprah combines the two most fascinating correlates of IQ in one person to such an extreme degree.
Nor Oprah or Opera are fascinating.
http://www.observedimpulse.com/2012/11/could-forehead-dimensions-be-correlated.html
If Oprah was white, i think part of its exceptionality specially via Pumpkin-fan would be reduced.
So Oprah endorses a liar? I hate Shillary. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not a Trump supporter either, but Hillary is a whole other level of NO. (I don’t support any politician as none of them are truly for us and they are all Jew-backed. Just like Hillary.)
Just like when she endorsed Obama in 08 and 12, the Democrats have done so well in raising blacks and other minorities out of poverty!!
We know the truth about Benghazi. When Hillary gets in that will be the final nail in the coffin for this country. Oprah doesn’t seem too smart in endorsing Hillary. Just like how she’s obese, two strikes against her.
Most influential woman… more influential than Angela Merkel? Most people in the rest of the world have never even seen Oprah’s show!
Most people in the rest of the world have never even seen Oprah’s show!
It doesn’t matter. She dramatically influenced the most powerful country in the history of the World, at the peak of its power, and she did so for decades. As Santoculto noted, influence is hierarchal. Those who shape America, shape the World.
“he dramatically influenced the most powerful country in the history of the World, at the peak of its power, and she did so for decades.”
les Etats Unis is NOT at the peak of its power peepee.
Oprah did influence it…at least, certain sectors of its society…but not dramatically.
that’s like like saying the Super Bowl’s all-time highest rating “dramatically influenced” the US’ sports culture.
beyond playing a (certainly non-crucial) role in Obama’s election, you’d be hard-pressed to quantify her supposed international influence.
…was NOT…
les Etats Unis is NOT at the peak of its power peepee.
I’m not a historian but I would assume America was pretty close to the peak of its power after the fall of the Soviet Union and before the Iraq war, because during that small window of time, it was both the World’s sole superpower AND highly respected, and it was during that time and beyond that Oprah was both the most watched talk show host in America AND the most worshipped American woman. To have both the love of the people AND a level of media domination that is no longer possible today, is an incredibly powerful combination, especially since she had it for decades.
Very few people in American history have been that dominant for that long. Her relevance spanned the Reagan administration to Obama.
Oprah did influence it…at least, certain sectors of its society…but not dramatically.
Her influence was dramatic because she was so visible, and so beloved, and so much more intimate, emotional and confessional than anyone who had come before, and because the genre of talk show that Donahue invented, but Oprah popularized, were the dominant counter-culture movement of their time
that’s like like saying the Super Bowl’s all-time highest rating “dramatically influenced” the US’ sports culture.
But Oprah’s influence was much deeper because she was like a national therapist who would get people to open up about sexual abuse, addiction, infidelity, homosexuality, transgender issues…topics that had been taboo in the pre-Oprah era, and then her influence was multiplied by orders of magnitude because so many other broadcasters were trying to be the next Oprah and make all that money.
beyond playing a (certainly non-crucial) role in Obama’s election, you’d be hard-pressed to quantify her supposed international influence.
Her role in electing Obama was absolutely decisive. Two economists from the University of Maryland were able to show that had Oprah not endorsed him, Hillary would have acquired a MILLION extra votes than Obama. Her endorsement was huge because Oprah, as the most worshipped woman in the country, was especially popular among the housewives of Iowa (the first state to vote) and because prior to Oprah campaigning in South Carolina, Obama was even losing to Hillary among black women. Obama who was popular with PhDs, desperately needed to appeal to non-college educated Americans, many of whom watch daytime TV and saw Obama as a foreign elitist until Oprah humanized and Americanized him.
And Obama’s presidency was unbelievably influential, not only on a racial level, but in terms of getting health care to millions of people and preventing a war with Iran.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_genocide_conspiracy_theory
LOL
if massters said
”i believe”
signed: slave.
just ignore the countless links I provided about the genetics of SW Asian, specifically, Syrians/Lebanese.
Bosnians are southwestern europeans, so*
the problem is not just genetics, dementia…
you’re bizarre
good bye, =)