On twitter the HBD community continues to debate over whether ethnic genetic interests exist. To me there’s no debate about whether ethnic genetic interests exist, the only debate is whether behavior that advances one’s ethnic genetic interests was selected for, and if so, was it selected directly or merely as a by-product of regular kin selection (as commenter Swank suggested).
I think the problems is critics of EGI are assuming that just because something might not have been directly selected for, that therefore it’s not genetically adaptive. But that’s a semantic argument, not a scientific one, and in my humble opinion, critics are wrong on the semantics.
For example donating volumes and volumes of sperm to a sperm bank is just as genetically adaptive as trying to have sex with women, yet few men are as obsessed with donating sperm as they are with chasing women, despite the fact that the former pays money and the latter costs money. That’s because humans were selected to obsess over sex, and there has not been enough time for men to be selected to obsess over sperm donation.
But just because sperm donation is not an evolved impulse does not mean it’s not in our genetic interests. Similarly, even if we don’t have an evolved impulse to favour our race or ethnicity, does not mean it’s not in our genetic interests.
Any behavior that makes life on earth more genetically similar to you is in your genetic interest, BY DEFINITION.
But just because something is in your genetic interest does NOT mean you should do it. We’re humans, not beasts; we can and should rise beyond our primal urges, assuming this even evolved into an urge.
So, I’m going to use my personal motives here;
how are Ethnic Genetic Interests, typically identified.
I suppose the picture of Oprah and the Young Artist yesterday, was sheerly visible (she saw she was Black, and knew she could help) or Oprah knows what the names of African countries are to give money to schools……
does that mean, say a dumb Hispanic and dumb Asian could have EGIs for each other because they look the same (a pure large racial connotation)? I.E. Epicanthic Fold, small builds, etc, the glaringly obvious?
People probably evolved to prefer those they grew up around, who look and behave like their family etc, because all of these things are proxies for genetic similarity.
A Chinese person would probably prefer another Chinese person to a Japanese person who he would prefer to a Native American who he would prefer to a white who he would prefer to a black
Indeed in the 1992 LA riots, even though blacks were mad at white cops for the beating of Rodney King, they took out their rage on Korean shop owners because the genetic difference was so great, they couldn’t stand it.
Along with matching by culture, which is another proxy for GST.
This is exactly what occurs.
That and they are extremely violent.
Ah roof Koreans.
pp- I still have the write up on Iberians/White Hispanics being left out in the cold on this issue by other Whites…….
🙂 ?
” they took out their rage on Korean shop owners because the genetic difference was so great, they couldn’t stand it.”
Lmao, what the fuck? I think you’re going too far. The blacks who participated were simply stupid and expressing their anger on an irrational level. I seriously doubt that the blacks were so angry at the asians for just being asian.
meLoisan- I don’t like racism.
And I’ve seen Blacks be very, very racist to Asians, more so than they are racist towards Whites. I was sort of taken aback.
Blacks don’t have prejuidice against Hispanics because Hispanics are generally poor like them.
BUT
Asians are even MORE successful than Whites,
and
there is a large genetic distance (albeit not as large as ‘Spanics).
That’s strange, I’ve had the opposite anecdote. Where i’m at a lot of blacks hate hispanics because “they try to be like us”
How do you know that blacks weren’t targeting asian stores out of pure coincidence because they were simply projecting their anger in the wrong way. The trashed their own damn neighborhoods.
What? Look at what’s happening in California. The Mexicans are driving the blacks out. Hispanics hate blacks.
I don’t like racism.
translating
” i dislike white people ”
No, Santoculto.
You’re just making shit up.
Believe it or not, other races have been held back more than Whites.
When George Soros starts a revolution in your country you thing you are going to be treated well as a refugee to a White country?
Think again.
”When George Soros starts a revolution in your country you thing you are going to be treated well as a refugee to a White country?
Think again.”
If a ”white” country still exist.
Who*
Soros*
the best refugee against human lunacy is not in their epicenters.
What make you think that i just give relevance to the ”white peoples”**
You’re coerent with your thinking lines, i can’t understand you.
you ARE not.
Soros has backed Black Lives matter, is considered the Pre-eminent globalist, and also has ties to Dilma Rousseff.
He is a Jewish Businessman and Hungarian-American. He survived the Holocaust.
Geoge Soros is considered the Pre-eminant globalist.
-Jew with massive chip on his shoulder (survived holocaust)
-Allies with Black Lives Matter, Dilma, etc.
blacks dislike Asians, because they are a racial minority that emulates White success. There’s no surprise with that. And furthermore, yes, blacks know fully well, that Asians are too uptight and neurotic for their carefree ways, and vice versa.
There aren’t many Iberian Whites in America, so it’s irrelevant.
are you irrelevant?
Am I irrelevant?
Was Ted Cruz irrelevant?
Was Georges Borjas irrelevant?
no.
Bravo, he finaly gets it.
”On twitter the HBD community continues to debate over whether ethnic genetic interests exist. To me there’s no debate about whether ethnic genetic interests exist, the only debate is whether behavior that advances one’s ethnic genetic interests was selected for, and if so, was it selected directly or merely as a by-product of regular kin selection (as commenter Swank suggested).
I think the problems is critics of EGI are assuming that just because something might not have been directly selected for, that therefore it’s not genetically adaptive. But that’s a semantic argument, not a scientific one, and in my humble opinion, critics are wrong on the semantics.”
Finally,
exactly what i also think.
this dichotomy is false.
there are subgroups in all human populations who are more prone to be tribal and also subgroups who are less tribal.
simple like that.
The differences is that is the least ethnic/genetic/genotypical tribal group who are in the power in the ”West” (i’m talking about whippies= white hippie) and also the wolfes in the lambskin (fake whippies as Killary and ((otherrs)) 😉 ).
EGI applied in a macro-social level need first understand the hierarchical nature of human cultures and also the psycho-cognitive (personality+ cognition types) diversity of human beeeings.
”not have been directly selected for”
go back to the first lessons on genetic inheritance, let’s go!!
”We’re humans, not beasts”
only this part
beasts**
more respect, we are not ”sons of the god”, so sorry.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3532116/Sperm-donor-39-helped-create-36-children-didn-t-reveal-profile-schizophrenia-criminal-history.html
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
sperm donation via ”eugenic” reasons is so grotesque that this made me laugh!!!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3643248/Oprah-Winfrey-says-alcohol-bread-weakness-losing-30-pounds.html
Lol what the hell is this? For someone who’s claimed to be so smart, she made an idiotic comment. She clearly doesn’t know that your body only cares about kcal, not food quality. Of course you can eat bread and drink alcohol and lose weight, if you’re still in a kcal deficit!!
One of the dumbest statements I’ve read all week. Wow. Though, the average American is nutritionally retarded, so she has a lot of people in her club.
1. If she’s cutting, she’s cutting…
2. I believe carbohydrates have more calories per gram than pretty much any other form of Nourishment.
That’s what she means….
Lol what the hell is this? For someone who’s claimed to be so smart, she made an idiotic comment. She clearly doesn’t know that your body only cares about kcal, not food quality. Of course you can eat bread and drink alcohol and lose weight, if you’re still in a kcal deficit!!
Oprah actually doesn’t claim to be that smart. Oprah is one of those interesting elites (and Donald Trump is another) who built her popularity on being able to relate to average people.
As Geraldo said, Oprah was the first talk show host who looked and sounded like a member of the audience.
This is very different from Hillary and Obama who built their brand by projecting the image that they were the smartest, most educated people in the room.
It’s me who thinks Oprah is so smart, because statistically, you’d expect someone with that much success (money/power) and that much head size to have an excellent IQ, even if they’re a member of a low scoring race.
Even Rushton thought it was absolutely fascinating when I told him that the most successful black and most successful female in the World (at her peak) was also arguably the biggest brained black and biggest brained woman in the World.
“There’s definitely a very clear connection there,” said Rushton.
Pumpkin Person: Any behavior that makes life on earth more genetically similar to you is in your genetic interest, BY DEFINITION.
https://www.16personalities.com/infp-personality
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitarianism
Other beliefs[edit]
Although there is no specific authority on convictions of Unitarian belief aside from rejection of the Trinity, the following beliefs are generally accepted:[57][58][59][60][61][62]
One God and the oneness or unity of God.
The life and teachings of Jesus Christ constitute the exemplar model for living one’s own life.
Reason, rational thought, science, and philosophy coexist with faith in God.
Humans have the ability to exercise free will in a responsible, constructive and ethical manner with the assistance of religion.
Human nature in its present condition is neither inherently corrupt nor depraved (see original Sin) but capable of both good and evil, as God intended.
No religion can claim an absolute monopoly on the Holy Spirit or theological truth.
Though the authors of the Bible were inspired by God, they were humans and therefore subject to human error.
The traditional doctrines of predestination, eternal damnation, and the vicarious sacrifice and satisfaction theories of the Atonement are invalid because they malign God’s character and veil the true nature and mission of Jesus Christ.[63]
Unitarians have liberal views of God, Jesus, the world and purpose of life as revealed through reason, scholarship, science, philosophy, scripture and other prophets and religions. They believe that reason and belief are complementary and that religion and science can co-exist and guide them in their understanding of nature and God. They also do not enforce belief in creeds or dogmatic formulas. Although there is flexibility in the nuances of belief or basic truths for the individual Unitarian Christian, general principles of faith have been recognized as a way to bind the group in some commonality. Adherents generally accept religious pluralism and find value in all teachings, but remain committed to their core belief in Christ’s teachings.[citation needed] Unitarians generally value a secular society in which government is kept separate from religious affairs. Most contemporary Unitarian Christians believe that one’s personal moral convictions guide one’s political activities, and that a secular society is the most viable, just and fair.[citation needed]
Unitarian Christians reject the doctrine of some Christian denominations that God chooses to redeem or save only those certain individuals that accept the creeds of, or affiliate with, a specific church or religion, from a common ruin or corruption of the mass of humanity.
In 1938, The Christian leader attributed “the religion of Jesus, not a religion about Jesus” to Unitarians,[64] though the phrase was used earlier by Congregationalist Rollin Lynde Hartt in 1924[65] and earlier still by US President Thomas Jefferson.
Debate over.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/05/16/ethnic-genetic-interests-and-group-selection-does-exist-a-reply-to-jayman-2/
Meaningless. We are still animals driven by our biology. Free will is an illusion. We are driven by our genes to make more copies, nothing more.
We are driven by our genes to behave in ways that prehistorically causes our genes to thrive, but in our modern educated environment, smart people might often be driven to question their drives
Because more intelligent people can better control their urges. This is seen in average age of lost virginity by IQ.
http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/04/intercourse-and-intelligence.php
pp-hypothetical, so are people who marry outside their race, perhaps even, a certain individual/type in a lower intellected race (median), are they disproportionally smarter?
I hate testosterone.
I almost had a girlfriend but my mom refused to take me to the picnic party she invited me to, in 2010. In 2007 at university, my first semester, a girl visited me several times under a tree. But I did not know how to talk to her and I was too quiet. I had a book that went over my head so I could not explain to her what I was reading. I am still a virgin at 28. I do not fear sex so much as I fear being with the wrong person. I want her to be as sweet and intelligent and accepting as I am. I will not be alone for long though. Google A.I. will help me find the right person because it will read everything I do online along with her activities.
well, like pp said, that could just mean you’re smart 🙂 .
both pp and race realist, actually.
Racerealist,
are you a virgin?
I am not denying this correlation but I am suggesting it’s truth is resting on a Another. Namely, impulsiveness.
I believe it’s interesting that my passion is anthropology. It’s making me proud 🙂
I lost my virginity at a very young age but, it had nothing to do with impulsiveness. It was a competition with my friends and honestly at a certain level of intelligence you can “get pussy” at any age. I was 13 and my first sexual partner was 22 years old. She thought I was 17 because I “acted like it” (in her words) She was quite intelligent , able to pay the bills on her own without the help of social programs and was even raising a few kids.
Honestly if you’re “saving yourself” for a “better opportunity” then you are foolish not intelligent. Wear a condom and have fun. The idea that virginity is “sacred” or should be “cherished” is completely made up bulshit. Just be smart with your sex.
okay, is asexuality a thing?
I’ve fooled around sometimes, but got bored quickly, and honestly have stopped even looking. Is this normal? lol
I have highly Semitic features- that could be part of it..
not exactly a “heartthrob”
“I’ve fooled around sometimes, but got bored quickly, and honestly have stopped even looking. Is this normal? lol”
It is for me. I don’t have a lot of sexual interactions anymore not because I don’t want to but, Im not really in the kind of social situations that allow it anymore. i’m more focused on my education and the stuff I talk about tends to to go over the heads of most females I talk too. Sex gets boring after you’ve done it a lot, it becomes more about pleasing the other person and you start to neglect yourself, honestly I can do it better by myself so it’s sort of the preferred method now..
“I have highly Semitic features- that could be part of it..
not exactly a “heartthrob””
Really? I view prognathous facial features as an attractive male trait. men without it look friendlier but are more feminine looking as well.
I got a rounder face from my Northern European mother, but by semitic, I was referring to Hooked Nose, thick eyebrows, etc.
except I’m not a Jew with the Yarmaluke.
I always felt a great deal of affection towards Jews………..perhaps because of such
my women have been disproportionally Jewish.
This came up in my search for “semitic”
It truly breaks my heart….
Ha! Don’t feel bad I have similar traits but have found plenty of women. They’re masculine features. Is that a picture of you?
That photo of the girl is fucked up lol.
thanks man. That’s not me- I just wanted to show what I meant by “semitic”.
Jew ironically have small heads,
But I have a 24.4″ head circumference (measured just above the eyebrows) or 620 mm, which I believe is with Caucasian males having a median Head circumference of 560 with an SD of 15, is about 4 SDs! If I was at a crowd randomly selected of about 30,000 White males- I would have the largest Head!
lol
Another, you could use that picture as your avatar, though you might want to crop it.
“But I have a 24.4″ head circumference (measured just above the eyebrows) or 620 mm, which I believe is with Caucasian males having a median Head circumference of 560 with an SD of 15, is about 4 SDs! If I was at a crowd randomly selected of about 30,000 White males- I would have the largest Head!”
Egghead 😛 mines about 22.5 inches which I think is the world average, I don’t remember though.
Nope. What leads you to believe this?
”It truly breaks my heart….”
not literally, is not*
=(
”thanks man. That’s not me- I just wanted to show what I meant by “semitic”.
Jew ironically have small heads,
But I have a 24.4″ head circumference (measured just above the eyebrows) or 620 mm, which I believe is with Caucasian males having a median Head circumference of 560 with an SD of 15, is about 4 SDs! If I was at a crowd randomly selected of about 30,000 White males- I would have the largest Head!
lol”
aham
this is serious**
“Nope. What leads you to believe this?”
I didn’t believe anything friend, I was just asking a question 🙂
the Daily Stormer agrees with pp’s notion that Ted Cruz looks Jewish;
“Ted Cruzman”
http://www.dailystormer.com/katrina-pierson-probably-screwed-ted-cruz-and-delivered-the-video-to-the-leader/
illustrative arguments, lol
The only question you asked was “is it serious”?
Yes, I didn’t make that picture.
Here are the criteria for sperm donation.
http://www.spermbank.com/how-it-works/sperm-donor-requirements
This disqualifies a quite a few people.
“at least 5’9″”
Those poor asians haha.
”Those poor asians haha.”
i still try to understand, despise infertility of one of the couple or ”independent pregnancy” (generally made by cognitively smarrt femenzionists -= nazi become old fashioned, ;)), why some women to do this**
again, it’s grotesque
the same woman who abort their down syndrome fetus seems will be the same who will try this,
will be a good mother*
look like Michelle Pfeiffer in the movie ””I’m Sam”.
Interesting that Pfeiffer also have a surname Schindler.
no doubt that ”certain” people no have soul, look like a pre-organic robots.
most interesting about it is that most of this women think that their ”sons” will born and become a ”geniuses”.
a Robert Lindsay*
a Pumpkin Person*
gifted is not the same that a genius, but almost of iq-fetishists desire it probably because self-inflated egos//emotional insecurity, 😉
It’s like those who must pursue that thing and never reach
while others do not wait for that thing, and it just comes to them.
“the same woman who abort their down syndrome fetus seems will be the same who will try this,
will be a good mother*”
I’ve never been in a DS kids shoes.. I can’t really say if their life is so horrible that they’re better off dead.
“gifted is not the same that a genius, but almost of iq-fetishists desire it probably because self-inflated egos//emotional insecurity,😉
It’s like those who must pursue that thing and never reach”
Yes over at the thescienceforum I had noticed there is a “saying” about racialists: If you obsess over IQ you probably have a low IQ.
The majority of “geniuses” I’ve met tend to think that they’re not geniuses(they say they lack a lot of common sense) and actually think IQ tests are bullshit(not that I think this too or anything.)
”I’ve never been in a DS kids shoes.. I can’t really say if their life is so horrible that they’re better off dead.”
I think they tend to have very good lifes, fundamentally, if they live with reasonably good families and or environments, but specially because their pure and simple minds.
What may hurt them more is
[primitive] prejudice,
try to force them to ”learn” what ”normal” kids/adults tend to learn during school-life
i love this band!!
”Yes over at the thescienceforum I had noticed there is a “saying” about racialists: If you obsess over IQ you probably have a low IQ.”
I don’t think that most of those who are obsessed about their own iq will have in true low iq.
Just look for Robert Lindsay and Pumpkin Person.
I don”t think they ”have”/score lower [in] iq [tests].
My opinion is that what already said,
they don’t know OR they don’t want really learn what the terms ”genius”, ”intelligence” really mean, because their personal/emotional issues.
Seems ”easy” to do a iq tests, score higher and be imediately treated as ”iq higher than Einstein”, ”a genius”. people who are not very self-aware can become self inflated because their iq scores.
Genius is a very complicated term, not because itself, but because the subjectivity that people has used to define it.
Generally and succintly, genius is a extraordinary product of a extraordinary circumstances [being/their biology, their environment and what s’he is doing about it]. None born genius or talented because fundamentally, genius is a product of awakening of full-awareness of their own potential but i think can be fairly predictable and even inherited, sometimes.
humans can supposedly change their destiny,
most humans can more or less take their destiny via self-awareness and factual understanding and make something different about their lifes. most non-human animals no have this diversity of internalized refferences to live, they tend to become limited by their narrow or super-specialized skills.
genius is a easy capacity to grow/evolved individually in their life-time, and essentially producing extraordinary products, which are results of this higher level of self-awareness about itself or at least about their cognitive skills, what happen with savants.
We have talent: someone have a potential and s’he’s exposed to the right circumstances and become master (and visibly popular) in some skills. [but popularity is not fundamental requisite to the genius, itself)
And we have genius: someone have a greater creative potential, generally looking like a accute talent and s’he’s exposed to the right circumstances (or simply, is in a non-deprived environment) and instead mastering s’he revolutionizing your ”chosen’ area, whatever what is their area.
even to the creative people no have environmental excuses to be creative, because this is a intrinsic way to think, to live, sometimes, there is a necessity to have right circumstances.
just to the wise, that need itself to self-understanding, like a turtle, your real house (life realization) is itself.
So, genius is ultimately related with creativity than with [what we understand as] intelligence ( memorization and efficient replication).
If you score higher in iq tests and still revolutionize your area of work/voluntary obsessiveness, so we can to say that ”you’re [become] a genius and with high iq scores”
If not, we can’t to say for you that just because their iq scores you’re genius.
i think this correlation will be higher but not absolutely higher to the scientific geniuses and less for philosophical and artistic geniuses.
The most important question is identify people with potential to the genius [in ALL areas, and not just what nobel evaluate], generally people with very higher creativity [seems is not 100% correlated with higher iq scores, more probably with unusual assymetric psychometric profile, for example, super higher verbal iq and lower performance, but i think ”psychological” traits are also very very important and surprinsingly homogeneous among super-higher-achievers]
or voluntary/spontaneous/primary disposition (primary intrinsic motivation/ thinking style) to see [certain or specific] ”things” in a different or unusual ways.
genius, like a high functioning psychopath and autistics, is fundamentally a subtle thinkers and generally about specific/narrow things.
”The majority of “geniuses” I’ve met tend to think that they’re not geniuses(they say they lack a lot of common sense) and actually think IQ tests are bullshit(not that I think this too or anything.)”
Depend the type of ”genius” you have spoken.
which would be a lack of common sense *
”common sense” is always changing.
Yes, iq obviously measure ”something”, my opinion is that iq is good to measure quantitative levels of the cognition and not exactly intelligence.
Is something that is far to be just a bullshit as if iq is just like horoscope. Nope.
Most of this people who just say very vaguely that iq is bullshit have hidden political/emotional motivations.
most them are being dishonest
I read ”The man of the genius” by Cesare Lombroso and he said that most of the historically recognized european geniuses of the past also were very stupid in many things, that popular idea of creativity, greater thinkers also produce volumous bullshit.
most of very higher intelligent people may suffer with ”think yourself” and ”polymath syndrome”, over-confident about themselves with little intellectual humility, accept that is not good in something or that can be thinking wrong.
the life in the end is very simple
repeat the behavior and thinking of others, you will become more popular than you’re.
repeat the same thinking lines in the job, maybe you gain an increase in their salary.
to be succesfull is primarily to be conformist.
“I think they tend to have very good lifes, fundamentally, if they live with reasonably good families and or environments, but specially because their pure and simple minds.
What may hurt them more is
[primitive] prejudice,
try to force them to ”learn” what ”normal” kids/adults tend to learn during school-life”
You’re right it’s foolish to try and teach an “abnormal” person “normal” things.
“I don’t think that most of those who are obsessed about their own iq will have in true low iq.
Just look for Robert Lindsay and Pumpkin Person.
I don”t think they ”have”/score lower [in] iq [tests].”
It isn’t necessarily them obsessing over their OWN IQ’s its more like other’s IQ’s. The only reason I and many others say this is because it’s reflective of a “fixed” mindstate
http://nexxtlevelup.com/everything-else/the-truth-behind-the-hbd-cult-prt-2/
http://nexxtlevelup.com/everything-else/the-truth-behind-the-hbd-cult-prt-3/
“The most important question is identify people with potential to the genius [in ALL areas, and not just what nobel evaluate], generally people with very higher creativity [seems is not 100% correlated with higher iq scores, more probably with unusual assymetric psychometric profile, for example, super higher verbal iq and lower performance, but i think ”psychological” traits are also very very important and surprinsingly homogeneous among super-higher-achievers]”
I agree, there is a difference between high intelligence and “genius” and honestly I feel as I’m one of those “high verbal” “low performance” type people I never did good in school and failed most classes but not because I was stupid, I just didn’t care. My teachers would be PISSED because i could still ace their tests and I was always suspended 🙂 I love breaking people’s stereotypes. They all thought I was your common “gangsta” until I came in and displayed a higher capacity for verbal debate as well as being able to soak their information like a sponge. I could raise hell at school because I could mentally afford it. I’ve never had to study a day in my life.
“Depend the type of ”genius” you have spoken.
which would be a lack of common sense ”
The most creative people are the ones without common sense because it takes that “out of the box” type thinking to accomplish such feats.
“Yes, iq obviously measure ”something”, my opinion is that iq is good to measure quantitative levels of the cognition and not exactly intelligence.
Is something that is far to be just a bullshit as if iq is just like horoscope. Nope.
Most of this people who just say very vaguely that iq is bullshit have hidden political/emotional motivations.”
I think it’s emotional rejection. The geniuses I speak of were simply tired of being viewed as numbers and not people essentially everyone props them up as if they’re supposed to do great things and this isn’t always the case.
”http://nexxtlevelup.com/everything-else/the-truth-behind-the-hbd-cult-prt-2/
http://nexxtlevelup.com/everything-else/the-truth-behind-the-hbd-cult-prt-3/”
Other thing that most of highly creative people to do
is
give a shit to the conformism and norms
i don’t know if i’m ”highly creative”, well, i always was very imaginative, in the end, most of ”them” just to do what non-human animals to do, make what you want to do, but with full human mindset type, a mix between animal realism (immediatism, objectivism, even pragmatism) with human abstract perception.
originality start with attitude/thinking independence, also produce mattoidism, the full-stupid creativity.
i’m lazy, a vagabond, trying to be a mutualistic post-parasitic little boy…
i think this links are very laughable.
hbds are JUST, on avg, neoconservatives but with their epicenter in biological studies.
they defend ”jews” and many times criticise them but just politely [many them are jews, period],
they defend Israel,
they are absolutely biased about muslims and tend to be cinical about past-western history, as well happen with most of all types of conservatives,
they defend capitalism,
they no have a real political agenda to organize themselves
or
even
to fight for white-”autoctonous” interests.
hbd is a try to synthesis about thesis (conservatism), liberalism (anti-thesis)…
but a try of completude without all the true, still will be a [negative] ism.
“hbds are JUST, on avg, neoconservatives but with their epicenter in biological studies.”
Well, I wouldn’t say on average, but the ones who are, are the lowest intellect- not because they don’t see the “great Jewish conspiracy” but because they are mainstream cons-
Tea Partiers.
Since they let these people in AmRen’s comments have gone to absolute Shit, and the actual content is as well.
Fresh from Breitfart…
Breitbart= Jew Neo-Con
Milo=Jew Neo-Con
Shapiro= Jew Neo-Con (false drama to make it look different than it really was)
Ann Coulter= Jewish neo-con darling.
“Cohen”, has done a thing or two.
It’s false opposition. Wake the fuck up.
“i’m lazy, a vagabond, trying to be a mutualistic post-parasitic little boy…”
Why do you think of yourself like that?
This statement:
“they no have a real political agenda to organize themselves”
And this statement:
“hbds are JUST, on avg, neoconservatives but with their epicenter in biological studies.”
Contradict each other.
”Why do you think of yourself like that?”
It’s true and is not bad.
”This statement:
“they no have a real political agenda to organize themselves”
And this statement:
“hbds are JUST, on avg, neoconservatives but with their epicenter in biological studies.”
Contradict each other.”
nope because REAL political agenda mean
REAL actions and not just have a blog or a site, i mean, try to be a politician or create a party.
“It’s true and is not bad.”
I didn’t say it was bad I was just asking why you think you are that.
“REAL actions and not just have a blog or a site, i mean, try to be a politician or create a party.”
I think you’re being a little semantic santo. Then again i may have misunderstood you, I was equivalating “political agenda” with “political bias”
Maybe I was contradictory but this wasn’t proposal. Indeed a political bias more than a agenda a real agenda at least by now.
They are not fully honest.
Also they have wrong dogmas like iq= intelligence theory
This is my nature
Just it
“Indeed a political bias more than a agenda a real agenda at least by now.”
I agree
“Also they have wrong dogmas like iq= intelligence theory
This is my nature
Just it”
How do you think your IQ affects your nature? Do you know your IQ?
Probably affect in my capacity to argue, to use my little, chaotic and incomplete knowledge. But my laziness is caused by a insipid combination: Mental hyperactivity + kinesthetic hypoactivity.
I don’t know. My psychologist promise to me a test. Via intuitive logic or based on my own impressions I think is likely that I score above american/British average (100) in performance, to 107 to 110. I estimate “my” verbal IQ in the 120’s-140’s. My cognitive weakness is mathematics, I know the basics and nothing more. A kind of partial dyscalculia. I think I have lower spatial IQ.
I’m the humanities-like one who are also interested in soft to not so soft science like psychology and basic genetics. I have a engineering stem “student” mindset, more logical. But I’m like a hippie, passionate about the life, ilogically idealistic, philosophical, in the end a intermediary paycho cognitive profile. I think I could have done a academic career in the humanities, just repeat the same nonsense and develop them, but not. I’m too morally correct to participate of these monstrous lies.
😁
Correcting again
LOGICAL and not illogical idealism, 😇
…we are enormously similar.
But my laziness is caused by a insipid combination: Mental hyperactivity + kinesthetic hypoactivity.
I enjoy some kind of exercise usually just swimming or climbing random things. but this is because I’ll get sudden bursts of “mental energy” and have the need to express it either through reading about anthropology/biology or just going nuts.
“via intuitive logic or based on my own impressions I think is likely that I score above american/British average (100) in performance, to 107 to 110.”
Same here. I got 103 on PP’s biodemographic evaluation and got 114 when I checked out my GED percentile ranking. So I averaged that to about 108 but i have never taken an official one.
“My cognitive weakness is mathematics, I know the basics and nothing more.”
Same here. It’s not that I think I have a low spatial IQ I just wasn’t interested in math until now. Only because it pertains to HBD. There was always 5 or 6 kids who could do better at math than me in class. which even then is still an IQ above 100.
“I have a engineering stem “student” mindset, more logical. But I’m like a hippie, passionate about the life, ilogically idealistic, philosophical, in the end a intermediary paycho cognitive profile. I think I could have done a academic career in the humanities, just repeat the same nonsense and develop them, but not. I’m too morally correct to participate of these monstrous lies.’
My exact feelings. I am better at humanitarian like subjects(anthropology) but it won’t get me anywhere in life. I want to pursue a degree that requires High level math simply because I want to test my limits with it and it’ll put food on the table. math is surprisingly fun when you do it right and there’s an actual context behind it.
”…we are enormously similar.”
yes seems it’s true.
I tend to be similar with asperger people because i’m quasi-asperger.
”I enjoy some kind of exercise usually just swimming or climbing random things. but this is because I’ll get sudden bursts of “mental energy” and have the need to express it either through reading about anthropology/biology or just going nuts.”
I’m not a complete lazy in this terms, during 2003-2007 more or less i played peteka with my father in the backyard with the clothesline as a net.
And sometimes i walk in the morning but I need there to transform the walk in part of my routine, if not I stop walking very quickly. In this very moment because the polar mass, i stoped to walk in the morning but I’ve been wanting to come back.
I’m objective in most of all details of my life, even to go to the street or out of house, i must need have a motivation to do it. I’m not like the classical mediterranean people where the place of the neighborhood is your living room.
”Same here. I got 103 on PP’s biodemographic evaluation and got 114 when I checked out my GED percentile ranking. So I averaged that to about 108 but i have never taken an official one.”
Yes, i know [based on a intuitive comparison] where i’m in the bell curve. I have the avg cognitive skills of a teacher (~110) but my personality type and my assimetrical cognitive profile made me more singular than a typical teacher.
”Same here. It’s not that I think I have a low spatial IQ I just wasn’t interested in math until now. Only because it pertains to HBD. There was always 5 or 6 kids who could do better at math than me in class. which even then is still an IQ above 100.”
Like, in geography i was the boss. in maths and specially in geometry i was and i’m the slave.
”My exact feelings. I am better at humanitarian like subjects(anthropology) but it won’t get me anywhere in life. I want to pursue a degree that requires High level math simply because I want to test my limits with it and it’ll put food on the table. math is surprisingly fun when you do it right and there’s an actual context behind it.”
that’s the part where we are different. Even i’m very risk in things that i’m not so knowledgeable like genetics, i dislike to force my weakness.
if i no have a strong inner personality and subsequently intrinsic motivations = to do what i really want, without any sacrifice, i probably had been a good student but i rarely to do what i don’t want to do. in the school i always was lazy to study, i always asked ”why i have to study it if i will not use it literally and most part of the time in my real life”**
school is a lie.
“yes seems it’s true.
I tend to be similar with asperger people because i’m quasi-asperger.”
It was interesting because I had read it and all I could think was “Am I looking in a mirror?”
“And sometimes i walk in the morning but I need there to transform the walk in part of my routine, if not I stop walking very quickly. In this very moment because the polar mass, i stopped to walk in the morning but I’ve been wanting to come back.”
Polar mass? I used to walk everywhere when I was in high school. Me and my buddy would walk to to girl’s or our other friend’s houses after school.
I don’t need motivation , simply because I’m always bored.
“I’m not like the classical mediterranean people where the place of the neighborhood is your living room.”
That’s a little depressing, Block parties were all the rage when I was younger. I had a girlfriend who lived in a trailer park and the entire neighborhood would be ablaze by the end of the night(figuratively of course) I don’t know what it is about tribal people but they do know how to have fun.
“(~110) but my personality type and my assimetrical cognitive profile made me more singular than a typical teacher.”
I also think that 110 is the average IQ of a criminal mastermind. I’d love to be a teacher….when I’m old.
“Like, in geography i was the boss. in maths and specially in geometry i was and i’m the slave.”
My weakest subjects were math and writing. Like you, I only know the basics. Geometry was fun though and it was much easier than algebra for me. I thought i was bad at geography until i figured out others were much worse. I was a “boss” in science and english and sometimes history(depending on who was teaching).
“if i no have a strong inner personality and subsequently intrinsic motivations = to do what i really want, without any sacrifice, i probably had been a good student but i rarely to do what i don’t want to do. in the school i always was lazy to study, i always asked ”why i have to study it if i will not use it literally and most part of the time in my real life”**
school is a lie.”
That’s the thing though, you won’t use any of it in real life….if you want to work at mcdonalds. I seriously regret not paying attention in math because now it would be a lot easier to follow along with HBD and get a decent degree if I had.
If you take an IQ test tomorrow and it said your IQ was 85 would you give up? I wouldn’t, fuck what a piece of paper says. I want to test my limits, I want to see what I’m truly capable of. I couldn’t give up on life I’d have to at least try.
I think is counterproductive try to surpass their own limits. My personal wisdom is to do the best you can with you already have. If you have a lower cognitive skills try always to do the best you can with it and not try intent strengths where you no have. But as I already said I’m not so cautious about it because I like to risk for example in genetics.
“If you have a lower cognitive skills try always to do the best you can with it and not try intent strengths where you no have. But as I already said I’m not so cautious about it because I like to risk for example in genetics.”
How do you know if your deficiencies are inherent? I feel like the reward is worth the risk.
Do you meet most of those qualifications race realist?
I meet all of them except a degree which I am currently pursuing. I wouldn’t donate any sperm though. I want to see all of my kids.
You previously said high class individuals were more autistic than low class ones. Does it mean that, controlling for IQ, low class individuals are socially smarter than high class ones ?
In my opinion, verbal & social skills, along with self awareness, are the most important part of intelligence to succeed in life, and thus move into the upper class. Which seem to partly contradict your point on high class individuals being more autistic than low class ones. (someone else asked this question)
Isn’t it true that Psychopaths, like people with Charisma, come across more intelligent than they actually are? (someone else also asked this question)
My girl might be pregnant I find out next week if she misses her period. Hopefully shes prego because then I’m 1 kid away from reproductive success *phew*its a long journey.
If I let my genetic line die out, am I supposed to feel bad about that?
No you won’t feel bad, but you won’t feel good either. Since your male and therefore permanently fertile. You shouldn’t feel bad about not having children by X year. Where as a female would
http://www.examiner.com/article/chinese-embassy-refuses-to-accept-petition-signed-by-11-million-to-end-yulin
”eugenics”
Pick a Language or use google translate.
Right now,
you have no language…at all.
Supposedly you think just because you have some ”new christian” surname you’re sephardic…
i have similar english– literacy of your [real hispanic] people,
give call-names to me about it is exactly like offend most of your people, your mommie, daddy, abuelitos…
to be 5% jews is not so different to be a black with 5% white-european or caucasian ancestry…
you’re like less-than-half russian mischlings who invaded Isisrael during the 90’s.
you’re a self hater hispanic like a mulatto who deny their black ancestry.
”less-than-a-half jewish russians”…
I do not have any blood related Jewish relatives that I know.
It’s designed to confuse you-
so you lash out at one of “them” challenging you.
You are 1/16 Black, yes?
”I do not have any blood related Jewish relatives that I know.
It’s designed to confuse you-”
why*
to troll*
”You are 1/16 Black, yes?”
i believe at least 2-3% and my higher estimative is ~10%.
The language of your people….
and mine, I guess you are indicating (if you say I’m a Jew I must be- cuz your a Jew and you have lots of secret Jew lists)…….
”Pick a Language or use google translate.
Right now,
you have no language…at all.”
but you read
and still illustrate this blog with your visual ”arg”.
I have no proof…
I don’t know your real name,
BUT
I’m guessing it’s like..
Joao Silva…or something.
try ”de Andrade”, is a example of a iberic surname that many new christians use to avoid inquisition. but remember that Andrade is not a jewish surname in their roots, was used, like ”Stein” in Germany and in other german-speak nations.
Shapiro is a real example of a real jewish ashkenazis surname
Abravanel is a real example of a real jewish sephardic surname
Well, i born in a region that received one of the highest immigration of portuguese sephardic jews in the XVII.
if you have a Jewish surname, you are openly Jewish.
If you have tried to hide, you are likely going to have had it mixed.
WELCOME TO THE TRIBE.
Thank you 😊
Trans-tribalism???
You know
You must need cut off
You know
PP — Have you ever served on jury duty here in the States?
It’s quite interesting to know that White Collar Criminal Cases are lot more interesting to participate as a juror, for readers here, because WC Criminals have above average IQs and commit sophisticated crimes, where as the usually petty crime committed by low IQ thugs, are boring and predictable. Someone with high IQ autistic/aspergers like conditions, would just daydream and wonder off with these type of court proceedings, which unfortunately, are the majority and the work of stupid people.
I got summoned for jury duty once. When I was inside the court, I realized how much of a waste of time it would be to serve in a run-of-the-mill DUI case, I’d rather be at work. So I lied my ass off and told them I didn’t believe in DUI laws and that I thought it should be legal to drink and drive.
That’s why juries make such dumb decisions. Anyone with a FUCKING brain knows how to get out of jury duty.
I suppose it would be interesting to examine the actions/motivations of a defendant, but as for actual subjects requiring one to use their high-IQ sustainedly- legal issues/ disputes of law are handled by the Judge, of course.
Smile 😊 momm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3640941/Super-rich-quaff-champagne-Venezuela-country-club-middle-classes-scavenge-food-rubbish-dumps-DOGS-starving.html
”elit” are so amazing,
why sometimes people try to eliminate them**
i don’t know!!!