Many people (especially educated people) don’t understand why I define intelligence as the ability to adapt. For aren’t the most adaptable life forms stupid organism like bacteria and cockroaches? Brilliant scholar Noam Chomsky makes the point in the below video (hat-tip to commenter Stetind).
But bacteria are not adaptable at the phenotype level. They are adaptable at the genetic level because they mutate very rapidly, but the very fact that they need to mutate shows that their existing DNA at a given time does not give rise to an adaptable phenotype.
Similarly, cockroaches are not actually adaptable. They have what Chomsky calls a fixed ecological niche which simply means they are lucky to be extremely adapted to a particular situation, but they can not necessarily adapt when the situation changes. Lucky for them, their situation never changes, which is why it’s called a FIXED ecological niche.
The only truly adaptable life-form are humans, because we adapt at the phenotype level: rather than genetically mutating into another phenotype, we simply have a flexible phenotype that can change its behavior. Rather than having a fixed ecological niche, we can conquer any environment, from the Sahara to the arctic, from underwater to the moon.
However even though intelligence is the ability to adapt: to take whatever situation you’re in and turn it around to your advantage, intelligence might indeed be to our disadvantage and cause the extermination of us all. That’s because what is to each of our advantages at the individual level and even the tribal level, might be destructive at the species level.
As astronomers have hinted, this may explain why the search to find intelligent life on other planets has proven so elusive. Once a species becomes smart enough to create advanced technology, they might ultimately destroy each other. Evolution may not yet have created a creature that has both high intelligence, and the emotional maturity to handle all the power that brings.
Pumpkin Person 
I’m currently reading E.O. Wilson’s book “The Meaning of Human Existence”. What are your thoughts on Kin Selection Theory vs the Multi-level Selection Theory?
It’s a good read so far. I’m a few chapters in. My next read is The Blank Slate by Steven Pinker.
you’d do better to read the catechism.
sociobiology is retarded.
Why is sociobiology retarded?
Cool I never new we had a phenotypal ability to adapt.
I’m sorry that I haven’t been blogging and i don’t think I can. I’m too prole. But i guess I’ll comment on this blog and various others.
“”””””Stupid bacteria”””””””””
You’re stupid!!!!!
The evolution of life can (and most likely does) push things into the extremes of physics. I’d be quite surprised to learn that there are no alien Googles in our living rooms. For hundreds of millions of years or more.
I’d be quite surprised to learn that there are no alien Googles in our living rooms. For hundreds of millions of years or more
Can you elaborate?
Yeah, it’s artistic expression. I mean, you can easily imagine evolutionary forces driving computer software into exotic physics (which has/is already happening here). You can have computer viruses uploading themselves into space (much like wi-fi) and using the expansion of the universe to reach new Hubble volumes for example. Or you maybe you can exist near black holes or neutron stars. Humans or our current civilization is nowhere near the pinnacle of evolution we think it is. My personal guess is that we are ~ most likely alone in this universe, but if there were some alien civilizations, than the above described scenario is quite likely.
My personal guess is that we are ~ most likely alone in this universe
Is that just intuition or do you have logical reasons for thinking we’re alone?
Intuition. If I may guess, life is very common. The more we find about earlier Earth, the more it seems life developed quickly. It may have been pushed to 4 Bn years ago by recent discoveries, 3.8 if you go by longer held views, that’s only about 0.25-0.5 Bn years after oceans came to existence (the early Earth had no continents and the little islands it did got swept by 1 km+ tides from the early Moon).
Eukaryota seems to have emerged as soon as the oceans were saturated with O2 and so on. My problem is with technological civilization, it seems like something really complicated.
I don’t know if life is common. Earth is the only known planet where it has occurred & even here, it might have only occurred once.
But I think once life evolves, it’s only a matter of time before high intelligence occurs, but because high intelligence is so complex, it takes several billion years to evolve. We think it’s so rare simply because we’re the first (on earth ) to make the leap & it may indeed be rare for life to:
1) occur on a planet
2) evolve continuously for billions of years (time needed for technological intelligence)
some other forum“we-need-a-new-theory-of-intelligence”
Mental abilities such as introspection are the result of an internal simulation as an environmental reconstruction. Modification at speed is the representation of possible future modifications. It is not simply trial and error but also planning around changes that gives a result of internal paths that become external actions. This is close to how DeepMind won Go against the world champion, accept being that modification is four dimensional. Thus a subset of representation is modified according to a smaller compressed representation. A branch searches for stable patterns. Unstable patterns branch into parallel hypothesis as 4D. What worked in the past is stable, unstable would combine different strategies of correlation. Recurrent Neural Nets would be the source of short term memory, failure or success, and this would allow retroduction. The mind’s eye is a RNN. Retroduction link future events to past events. The key is to make the A.I. have as many self inclusive hypothesis as possible. Optimal choices are not required for learning. It learns from experience, integrating more patterns.
I do not have a mind’s eye.
It might be helpful if I had one.
http://www.bbc.com/news/health-34039054
correlation is not causation
If an AGI can understand this, then patterns actually mean something.
Events can be seen as probabilities that constantly update;
Sue wanted coffee not soda, I will observe when she wants coffee instead of soda.
Human behavior is caused by self regulation, especially emotions.
Energy seeks more energy to live so it must be aware of more than one thought at a time.
More thoughts equals a more efficient energy utilization of a brain for survival.
Personality / temperament come from how the brain coordinates energy when thinking.
Reactive behavior is a sign that self regulation is not under control.
Self reflection can decrease impulsive behavior increasing delayed gratification.
Personality is a pattern of nonlinear dynamics that is quantifiable.
Currently I think the human brain is a recurrent neural network.
I am not sure how Deep Learning can model a recurrent neural network.
The human brain as a RNN changes its behavior when you look at it.
Predicting human behavior with Deep Learning is the next step toward the singularity.
I swear I’m banned…..
Where are my posts?
What the hell is going on?
whatever you say, Dr. Carson..
So are we still evolving ?
If yes in wich direction ? A disgenic way ?
Since the appearance of bourgeoisie, the traitors of the group-evolutionary solidarity in medieval period.
We have evolved and continue to evolve to ”domestication”.
Can you tell me more please ?
Civilization ”naturally” need to eliminate those who are wilder, or reduce its quantity, so it can be effective. Civilization, not by itself, forced the man to self-taming.
However, the true evolution tends to be by the most wild types or evolutionary normal types, which are by nature more perceptive. A population of any species that is very docile, will be at risk for itself, for its natural weaknesses.
more docile animals are less logically emotional or instinctual and tend to be natural dependent (slaves) of their superiors.
The human species has evolved in the same way that an ant and other super-social species.
Just as the dog has not evolved directly from the wolf but has been modified from its original attributes, to become tame.
We have evolved from our domestication. But this can not be set to ” evolution ”, at least if there is no qualitative change on this path, because if not …
During the medieval period the most intelligent servants began to build their own businesses, resulting in what would become the bourgeoisie, and later the middle class. It was eugenic process, in part, because over time the European bourgeoisie was increased demographically within a classically Darwinian environment. However, they ended up betraying those who were once their class comrades, the servants.
The middle class or intermediate between the ” noble ” and semi-slaves, servants.
Barbera, are you Santoculto ?
The White demographic has a substantial amount of undomesticateds with tame. Euro society was the best and still the best.
The black demographic has a substantial amount of pure wilds with few tame. No civilization.
The East Asian demographic is all pure domesticateds. East Asian societies are failures in the sense that they cannot progress and maintain. Domesticateds are more than tame, too tame. Semi-civilization.
It appears that the Latin American, Middle Eastern, Southwest and Southeast Asian societies are unpredictable civinlizations, because of their mixed racial heritages, but Brazil is definitely a wild Africa uncivilization.
my parody of you, Santo!
”my parody of you, Santo!”
I don’t understand.
”The East Asian demographic is all pure domesticateds”
I also see that way. Whites are in the process to become ”asiatized”.
*”I also see that way. Whites are in the process to become ”asiatized”.*”
The East Asians of course have a culture of conformity, stemming from the fact that due to their High-IQ, they simply mastered methods, and that worked *most efficiently*.
Everybody bashes the North East Asians for this, but , look at their standard of living in Japan and South Korea, it’s a working system.
As long as Whites are around (in general) to come up with things, the Asians will find a more efficient way of doing it and will gain the most from it (since they are adding more efficiency it is NOT parasitism).
But the Anglo Proles are still savages, despite Whites becoming like Asians.
The least happy western countries are all English speaking, and these barbarians are loaded with money and all kinds of gaudy goods to justify their existence.
”The East Asians of course have a culture of conformity, stemming from the fact that due to their High-IQ, they simply mastered methods, and that worked *most efficiently*.
Everybody bashes the North East Asians for this, but , look at their standard of living in Japan and South Korea, it’s a working system.
As long as Whites are around (in general) to come up with things, the Asians will find a more efficient way of doing it and will gain the most from it (since they are adding more efficiency it is NOT parasitism).”
Agree too.
well, people forget the fact that east asians tend to have bigger brains than whites and domestication tend to mean ”reduction of the brain size”. So**
Based on this perspective, east asians are, collectively speaking, in the higher level than euro-caucasians in ”eugenic path”, better health, better mental health on genera, higher cognitive skills and ”domestication-like behavior”.
But, creativity and specially those who are highly creatives, surpass this aspect because what defines genius in their potential is the very self-perception of singularity, in other words, the logically true path to the human evolution, the qualitative increase of self-awareness, what made us different than other living beings, our singular high mark.
I think about universal psychological trends among mongoloid human race. They tend to be taciturn and pragmatic, from Beijing to Tierra del Fuego, in extreme south of South America.
I think inhibition latent levels among east asians tend to be too high that reduce their creativity but this also happen with MANY euro-caucasians as well humans on general. Is the proportion of people with reduced filltering brain efficiency that tend to correlates with higher creativity.
Creativity is always a defect in the brain, something ”wrong” is happening there, too high or too lower in certain cognitive domains.
East asians specially northern ones seems to be much more cognitively smart, but their ”perfection” based in this perspective tend to correlates with many other vulnerabilities or disadvantages.
My theory is that when multicultjewdalism become stronger in this countries the resistance will be very lower than in western nations, if…
Above-average people are good to internalize efficiently and indiscriminately the new cult-tural guidelines because they tend to be efficiente in every cognitive activities they does, for their good or not.
Of course this is not the trans-order of creativity, the big C that whites tend to have exactly because higher mutational load than east asians. the truth that hbd’s and their bluecaps don’t want to see.
Santoculto-
I am glad that you agree. I think that, many of these WN types who consistently bash the Northeast Asians are beginning to remind of Black Panthers, they take tidbits of evidence, ignore the preponderance of the evidence, and then spread propaganda based on such. (I.E. Egyptians were Black, while there was some Black ancestry, and it was not uncommon to see a Black in a drawing or something, overall, the autosomal percentages were what they were). They ignore the proponderence and just put forward a snap shot image. That’s what these Anti-Asian types are; all this esoteric stuff about White History (lots of records are lost), while just assuming Asians had a crappy history, when they don’t really know. In the modern day it’s flipped flopped, and while Black Supremacists can’t beat off about their mostly-fabricated great history, Whites are 100% allowed to do that. It’s a joke.
P.S. Do you think Dilma is going to be ousted? She’s hanging on until the bitter end, it seems.
What seems east asians, on avg, evolved too faster, losing, by now, the inheritance of qualitative possibilities, namely BIG C, and what is happening, whites will follow the same pattern (scandinavians, for example) if they, on avg, were not being exterminated.
Blacks have lower inhibition latent than the macro-human races and east asians the higher inhibition latent = higher concentration levels.
Artistic gymnastics is a very good source to look for macro-patterns among macro-races where white gymnasts will tend to be very variable with many geniuses of this sports, blacks with greater potential to produce technical geniuses (adhd and hyper focus) and east asians, always, *on average*, very good. Of course, a lot of environmental factors affect the differences among nations but in nations where certain sports is super valued and incentived, this environmental noise, seems reduced dramatically and genetic dispositions of the groups become predominant, what happen on general with ”’intelligence”’ levels.
The avg whites with above average intelligence tend to be behaviorally similar with avg east asians. Increase in domesticated-cognitive intelligence tend to mean higher introversion and collectivity.
The idea that scandinavians and teutonic countries are more honest than east asian countries seems relatively wrong specially because leftoid (((core jooish and other opportunistics))) corruption in every segment of these societies. And China have a communist system.
Yes, the problem among WN movement is the same in all collective-supremacist movement = convenience.
Ancient egyptians were ”whites” to prove that Egipt was a ”white civilization” but ethiopians with same phenotype, curiously, are not…
Egipt was a multi-cultural civilization with whites, mullatos, blacks, even mongoloid variant, i would no doubt.
If ancient egiptians were homogeneously whites, so why they painted themselves as mulattos**
But… greeks were nordics BECAUSE their nordic-like statues.
Double standard.
Different political systems select different people to the leadership and other hierarchically relevant occupations.
Just my impression.
EgYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYpt
Dilma is a retarded bitch, unfortunately, leadership is avoided by most of decent women.
Result = this bitches self-select themselves to the political life.
“But… greeks were nordics BECAUSE their nordic-like statues.
Double standard.”
Hell yes. Not even a logical fallacy, just illogical. “The evidence does not support what I believe so I will just make stuff up”.
European Whites are much closer to Asians in general than blacks, it seems. I’m not actually sure, however. Keep in mind Black intellect is stunted by Socio-Economic practices, etc. ESPECIALLY in Africa.
”Keep in mind Black intellect is stunted by Socio-Economic practices, etc. ESPECIALLY in Africa.”
Yes i note this.
http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/sft2.htm
Santo – Just listen to Rushton – He said East Asians have a cautious (conservative) mentality. Whites are risk takers. They have conquered the entire globe and have done crazy things that no other groups have done. Lower testosterone might also be another factor why East Asians lag.
California, including America’s most creative city, San Francisco, has the largest East Asian demographic in the entire country. They are close to zero, in terms of trendsetters. Now compare them to the Jews in New York City.
JS,
i know, i already read the Rushton famous work, i have their pdf in my email.
About testosterone,
i think is important also to note how testosterone is programming to work in certain groups. What seems ”evident” to be observed, ”r-strategy” men tend to have greater explosion of testosterone levels during their reproductive appex and reduce progressively during their last period of adulthood and begining of the elderly period.
East asian men, on avg, seems act homogeneously during their time-life, with comparatively little explosion of their testosterone levels during the reproductive appex (common situation we can see among ”proto-assexual nerds”)… OR… their reproductive appex tend to happens later. Blacks become sexually hyperactive during adolescence and the first period of adulthood. When the brain of the avg black man become mature. Greater brains delay to become mature. But seems there is a diversity of great brain developments. For example, prodigy, seems, tend to born with greater brains and this develop ”normally” or they born with ”savant-neurological marker” (some idiosyncrasy without the necessity to be a early greater overall brain but assymetrical or specific greater development).
Yes, what many people seems already has noted. East asians, on avg, act very similar in the diaspora as they tend to act in their countries. Greater technocratic efficiency, lower rates of criminality and seems, lower rates of original creativity, the marker of genius.
East asians are the most talented of the human races, based on the idea of ”talent”, as perfeccionist emulation of the genius works. They, seems, have greater proportion of greater emulators, talented people. But less geniuses, or original thinkers, as happen otherwise with whites. And blacks seems have comparatively speaking, higher % of low-functioning original thinkers.
”Archaic-like” races seems tend to have more savant-like talent people, a genius island sorrounded by a ocean of normalcy or even mediocrity and specially artistic ones.
”Advanced-like” races seems tend to have more ”complete” gifted people like non-genius prodigious people as well the classical thermite-like gifted people, the TALENTED polymath but not a deep, perfeccionist and original thinker.
I’ll know my testosterone levels on Tuesday. I did the exam last week.
Laura Pausini with beard, ok, ok
“my parody of you, Santo!”
Wrong!
It looks a lot like Chartreuse……………..
He’s just voting for Trump because Trump is against the NC transgender law.
1950s in Alabama/Mississippi didn’t have that, especially for Blacks, or those with re-vitiligo.
Progress!
Evolution never stops.
When a species becomes endangered, the evolution of this species ends.
That goes without saying.
ultimately…
peepee doesn’t care about the truth.
she doesn’t even admit that “the truth” exists.
facts are peepee’s enemies.
You’re having another psychotic episode.
Seriously
Your comments are increasingly random & bizarre
which reminds me…
colbert will subtly endorse trump thenceforth…
he may even use…
“hi. i’m chuckie” against hillary.
“*You’re having another psychotic episode.
Seriously
Your comments are increasingly random & bizarre*”
I’ve got it.
He’s Donald Trump’s sole black supporter; Dr. Ben Carson.
Explains why he hates HBD (doesn’t believe in evolution).
And he goes through “episodes” when he is off his Valium.
He’s been on a long breakdown streak since this moment; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-I6SmpuSo0
He forgot how exciting it was without valium, and he went of of it..
Lol
avg gamers hate liberals, seems.
well, at the time of events everyone is hating them.
http://mpcdot.com/forums/topic/8368-shitlib-facespng/page__st__200
Stupid people everywhere…
intelligent design***
Sorry,
stupid
WHITE
people…
DIALOGUE
rarified word for human-tards…
on the left or on the right.
her favorite commenter was Pincher Martin.
he commented here only because I was commenting here.
but when PM left she blamed Swank Nasty.
that’s how fucking autistic and retarded she is.
I did want pincher Martin to post here because he seemed to know a lot about psychometrics.
But what you’re too autistic to realize is all my posts about you in the early years were a calculated attempt to lure him to this blog and it worked like a charm.
Pincher Martin was banned from Lion, so is Videla, for their strong anti-semitic views with deductive reasoning. Lion didn’t like it.
But Lion’s blog is prole, and most of his followers aren’t interested in the things espoused by Pincher, Videla or even a rabbler like me.
and women can’t hold their liquor.
if peepee had drunk 3/4s of a bottle of gin…as i have…
would she seem “bizarre and random”?
i do NOT.
she WOULD.
Trump or not Trump, America’s only existence is a flea market.
Fewer people trading for goods means less greatness for its people.
Proles in the Anglosphere have eclipsed all Roman Emperors in comfort, luxury, and greed. Worse, not many have lifted a finger to get what they want, yet they berate the great conquerors of history for their greedy deeds.
gonna rip you in two peepee…
too late…
too late…
make me feel alright
G
L
O
R
I
A
…
P
E
E
P
E
E
…
I CAN FUCK YOU BACK TO HETERO AND CIS-GENDERED PEEPEE.
The videos posted here are always so intellectually stimulating.
Please do share more, both visitors and Host.
And feel free to link to other resources where I might pick up these fascinating talks and discussions (and items similar). Great books too have I seen recommended here, so keep sharing those as well.
Thank you
Highly enjoyable homepage.
‘Liberals’ ”are’ smarter
”Many people (especially educated people) don’t understand why I define intelligence as the ability to adapt. ”
Just your humble impression.
”Brilliant scholar Noam Chomsky makes the point in the below video (hat-tip to commenter Stetind).”
You really like to praise certain people all the time, like my pathological liar uncle.
yes-man.
”They are adaptable at the genetic level because they mutate very rapidly, but the very fact that they need to mutate shows that their existing DNA at a given time does not give rise to an adaptable phenotype.”
Mass extinctions seems trivial among them.
Human beings seems have the lowest mortality rates of all terrestrial living beings.
”Similarly, cockroaches are not actually adaptable.”
Seems something wrong with this sentence.
Simple living beings to not-so-simple ones like cockroach tend to be collectively adaptable, and less individually. super extreme r-”strategy”, less care AND self-care because lack of holistic perception skills, like human beings have.
human beings, i mean, generally and superficially, can see the BIG PICTURE, what we define ”reality”. the ideal level of perception, not too high or too lower, all senses well balanced.
But the idea of ”adaptability” seems very complex to be reduced to just one perspective, even the reproductive ones.
”The only truly adaptable life-form are humans, because we adapt at the phenotype level: rather than genetically mutating into another phenotype, we simply have a flexible phenotype that can change its behavior. Rather than having a fixed ecological niche, we can conquer any environment, from the Sahara to the arctic, from underwater to the moon.”
Really***
Explain me why white people (one of the most smartest of humans) are not adapting themselves**
”We have a flexible phenotype”
We**
I no have a flexible phenotype, most people don’t have.
We continue to adapting via macro-level, i mean, we are extremely influenced by macro-social events, less hollywood party (extremely boring and tacky).
we are very worker ants (i’m not, i born ‘to lazy’ and enjoy th’life)
Seems the narrative of ”design intelligent people”,
http://www.esbnyc.com/sites/default/files/styles/timely_content_image_large__885x590_/public/default_images/brs_0330.jpg?itok=LvqTWQyo
oh, nature is amazing, god do it!!!!
but….
”They have what Chomsky calls a fixed ecological niche which simply means they are lucky to be extremely adapted to a particular situation, but they can not necessarily adapt when the situation changes. Lucky for them, their situation never changes, which is why it’s called a FIXED ecological niche.”
I think that chomsky wasn’t the first to say this truism.
”However even though intelligence is the ability to adapt: to take whatever situation you’re in and turn it around to your advantage, intelligence might indeed be to our disadvantage and cause the extermination of us all. That’s because what is to each of our advantages at the individual level and even the tribal level, might be destructive at the species level.”
blob:https%3A//mail.google.com/c06d02d7-bb83-41a6-bb07-e0fcd3e2682f
this, is the perfect concept of intelligence, what it *is*.
”to do the right thing in novel situations”
”and the emotional maturity to handle all the power that brings.”
chomsky said it too*
But maybe. we should also think if the microorganisms can be very careful among them, intra-species talking. They live very little, compared to us. But the perception of the time of simple living beings certainly is not the same as ours (duuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr).
whatever
YOU HAVE INDICATED THAT ADAPTABILITY IS THE MEASURE OF HUMAN INTELLIGENCE. I AGREE . LOOD AT OSS AND SOE EXECUTIVE AGENTS IN OCCUPIED FRANCE DURING WORLD WAR TWO. YOU ALSO ESTIMATED DONALD TRUMP’S IQ AT ABOUT 125, TED CRUZ IQ ESTIMATED AT APPROXIMATELY 145. .NOW THAT TRUMP HAS BEATEN A FIELD OF SEVENTEEN CANDIDATES, IT APPEARS THAT SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE HAS “TRUMPED” COGNITIVE INTELLIGENCE.
Correct, this is where Jews win and the East Asians lose. Verbal ability and sociability with above average IQ, are needed to play the game called America.
Is it a surprise to you that most Jews live in the most influential and important cities?
San Francisco is not one of them. Jews only care for power and influence.
Yeah, true, but it’s unfortunate.Trump winning the Presidency is going to fuck us, big time. The Department of Defense is going to have to baby-proof his “major nominee” briefing, to be given in Late July(MSNBC), just Six Months before he will take office. What a joke.
I am disappointing that HBD is such a joke that the adherents have to jump at the first clown who comes trolling.
What a disgrace.
I am absolutely done with the Proles of this country, and the immoral people using them.
American Proles are “the black subjects” of the Republican party. Easily manipulated, abused and used. The democrats exploit blacks, while Republicans do it with the average prole white.
There are exceptions. Dont make a generality of a particular case. Personality traits play an important role. Chance do too, may be Cruz would have win if this election took place another year.
pumpkin have you posted about video games?
I’ve posted about chronometric software (i.e. computer games designed to measure & improve intelligence) but not typical video games
League of legends is one of the most popular PC games. You play matches of 5v5 where you’re one person among 9 strangers and must work with your team. The game has robust matchmaking and skill ranking algorithms. Bad players often blame their teammates for losses, but skilled players grind out their 51%-60% winrates and end up at the top.
It places people in explicit ranks (bronze, silver, gold, platinum, diamond) with subranks for each division, and special ranks for the top players. The best, professional, players always end up at the top.
The graph of distribution of players across ranks looks like a normal distribution with the left side lopped off (the worst players just elect not to play ranked). A lot of knowledge is required to play the game at a high level.. and a lot of play is outsmarting your human opponents and working with random teammates… I wonder how well the rank in the game is correlated with IQ.
Possibly of interest, from Dr. James Thompson:
http://drjamesthompson.blogspot.com/2015/09/life-is-iq-test-and-so-are-video-games.html
PP do you think it’s true that a higher IQ is correlated with drinking more alcohol?
No i think the opposite is true. Low IQ causes alcohol consumption & alcohol consumption causes low IQ.
Indeed in the WAIS-III & WAIS-IV standardization samples, people who use alcohol on a regular basis are excluded from the norms
In the fifth estate episode i recently posted about a Canadian with a self-reported IQ of 69, he mentions that after losing his rights, he turned to alcohol & was drunk for weeks
Entire low IQ communities like the aboriginals of Australia have been devastated by alcohol
The smartest person i ever corresponded with never touched alcohol because he wanted to preserve his huge intellect as he got older
”The smartest person i ever corresponded with never touched alcohol because he wanted to preserve his huge intellect as he got older”
A bunch of nonsense…
Some people born with certain vulnerability and if environment is risky so this people will likely to engage in this inborn vulnerability.
The question is not just
smart versus dumb
but
mutational load differential
majority of ”smarter” ones, SEEMS, have lower mutational load, BUT the ”smartest” have higher mutational load, specially those with greater verbal intelligence AND higher creativity skills. Just look for the correlation between greater verbal intelligence, alone, and bipolar disorder disposition…
writers, poets, many artists and disposition to ”mental disorders” or to develop their mental vulnerabilities.
Stronger personalities are commonly concentrated in the two extremes, lower and higher ”’intelligence”” or better, cognitive potential.
There is a higher proportion of ashkenazi jews with genes that previne them to become alcoholic (but they are 3 times in risk to develop some mental disorder proving XIX earlier studies about it).
Similar situation happen with east asians. They don’t ‘develop’ or select for this kind of ‘adaptations’ BUT they generally no have addict problems with alcohol.
you have some phenotypes:
– vulnerability and long term attraction to alcohol,
intense,
average,
lower
– vulnerability to become short term alcoholic but not long term attraction,
intense (people who sporadically provide a particular show when they drink beyond its limits)
average
lower
– no (addict) vulnerability and long term attraction to alcohol drinks,
intense,
average,
lower
– no perceived vulnerability and no attraction to alcohol.
vulnerability,
intense (become easily drunk),
average
lower
http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/8123-insanity
AshkeNAZIS have higher % of genetic diseases, why not also mental disorders***
inborn visible (if cultural environment have the components to produce it) or invisible vulnerability (like happen with amerindians within a ”modern” cultural environment).
no fucktard!
that’s ideology peepee…
…spread by jews…
https://newrepublic.com/article/115802/intelligence-and-drinking-studies-say-theres-correlation
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201010/why-intelligent-people-drink-more-alcohol
http://digitalsynopsis.com/tools/good-bad-habits-of-successful-smart-people/
you must be a tween peepee.
fucking GROW UP…
stat crux dum volvitur obrus
and for te love of god stop using such small sample sizes!!!!!!1
Here’s a huge sample size (nearly 50,000 men) that finds low IQ guys are more alcoholic
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/foodanddrink/foodanddrinknews/11430179/Heavy-drinkers-have-the-lowest-IQs-study-claims.html
Jensen claimed the same
sry, Make America Great Again told me to write that.
“*sry, Make America Great Again told me to write that.*”
If he told you to jump off a bridge, would you do it?
Ruhkuhkah said Chartreuse was probably a first-generation South East Asian-American, who failed under the intense cultural pressure, yet like his people in America, still adore Anglo culture, while not wanting to acknowledge that his problems, stem from him in some way or another, not the Jews.
Ruhkuhkah is almost entirely right, and assuming he’s not too mentally ill; I’d bet Chartreuse is either the child of an Igbo(Nigerian) or Punjabi(India/Pakistan) immigrant, not an SE Asian one. I see Igbos and Punjabis on the “race-realists’ ” threads, trying to get verification that their distinct looking and unusually successful tribes are exceptions to the alleged overall IQ of their ethnicities’.
He also hates women’
he was probably abondoned by his Punjabi or Igbo – American mother and raised by his Anglo-Saxon-American Harvard Educated father, hence influencing his great discontent overall.
That’s his biography….
He’s not Nigerian or Punjabi you stupid spic. The only reason you’re attacking him is cause he’s supporting Trump who’s gona deport your Spanish ass out of my country in 2017.
I’m racist I admit it. But I’m Southern
Italian. We’re the most pro-white people there are cause we come straight from Europe.
I’m going to the D.C. Museum of African Art next weekend…..want to come?
I was going to go to the Pro-Trump WN conference in the same city but I’ll change my plans just for you 😉
You’re right, sir.
I’m a wetback illegal.
I know you are sensitive about this, but I hope to make amend by setting you up with a sweet cellphone ringtone;
De nada.
P.S. Pumpkinperson should definitely allow this to be posted, if Chartreuse’s B.S. makes readership sky rocket, this should, too, hopefully.
“* We’re the most pro-white people there are cause we come straight from Europe.*”
My god, I like Italians, but most Italian-Americans are prole as shit;
Definitely some *semitic* features.
Versus:
My god you are a disgrace.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20827824-900-men-beware-moving-country-could-affect-your-libido/
Chartreuse is now “Toni”.
He got his balls cut off.
I tend to think it was a circumcision gone wrong.
The Spanish inquisition, that’s when people left beloved Espana.
I take it you are a “North Italy cave Jew”
I’m happy we Jews are countering the racists!
It’s tough these days, ever since Mark Rubenstein dropped out.
Oh, shit, I meant Marco Rubio…..
Pingback: 19 Essential Survival Skills You Will Need in Your Life
Random asteroid go brrrr. Oh wait. That or the equivalent happened multiple times already. The small ones always win. Copium. Lol, you think humans are adaptable when they exist only in an instant for geological times? so they don’t even count as lindy unlike sharks.