Pumpkin Person rating: 7/10
Earlier this week I watched the 1992 film School Ties starring Brendan Fraser, Matt Damon, Ben Affleck, Chris O’Donnell, Cole Hauser, Randall Batinkoff, Andrew Lowery and Anthony Rapp. The film is about an extremely prestigious Ivy League prep school that is so desperate to win a football game, that they break nearly two centuries of tradition and allow a Jewish student to attend because he’s an excellent athlete. The Jewish student, David Greene, played by Brendan Frasier, conceals his Jewish identity from his classmates, who hero-worship him for winning football games against rival schools, but when his secret is revealed, he goes from being the most popular guy on campus to an utter pariah, overnight, getting dumped by his beautiful blonde blue-eyed Gentile girlfriend who is suddenly too repulsed to kiss him.
Ironically, one of his biggest tormenters is some scrawny nerdy kid with glasses played by Anthony Rapp who looks like a teenaged Bill Gates. The nerd taunts Greene by pretending to sneeze, but instead of saying “hachoo” when he sneezes, he says “a Jew”. It was a bit unrealistic that a nerd would be the most anti-Semetic character in the film since anti-Semitism requires the kind of disgusting cynicism that naïve, borderline autistic nerds tend to lack. The film shows the despicable levels of anti-Semitism that existed in the 1950s before Jews used their high verbal IQs to transform the culture by dominating the media and academia.
The most annoying scene in the film was when the student played by Matt Damon says “good schools, good grades, connections…these are the keys to the kingdom. None of us makes it on our wits.” Even in a film made way back in 1992, we see this annoying idea that success in life is entirely predetermined by college, and that real-world intelligent behavior is irrelevant.
except no such anti-semitism as that depicted in the movie has ever existed in the US.
it’s a lie made up by jews.
haven’t you read unz’s article yet? http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-myth-of-american-meritocracy/
can you read?
and the evidence is that the lion’s share of the real world benefit to IQ comes from credentials. the mean IQ of a swedish CEOs is only 115.
even your leather daddy jensen has said as much…that there are IQ thresholds below which some achievements are impossible but whatever amount in excess is superfluous.
But SES is a largely genetically confounded factor.and doesn’t affect intelligence (http://drjamesthompson.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/does-social-class-affect-intelligence.html) so where does that leave us? Obviously with a more genetic explanation, since no other environmental effects are found, and norms of reaction are just an obfuscation as I established earlier.
you’ve established nothing other than your own imbecility carl.
1. SES DOES affect IQ. by A LOT.
2. the GSS is restricted in range, but the signal is clear…IQ matters very little independent of credentials.
3. a study using SEM at the HKSG found that the heritability of IQ, even if it were 100%, explained less than 6% of intergenerational status transmission….SEM accounts for things like rich kids being smarter on average for genetic reasons.
1. Disproven. There is no GxE interaction when it comes to SES and IQ. SES itself is genetically confounded.
2. Irrelevant to the heritability of intelligence.
3. It’s not IQ, definitely not IQ. Have you read Gregory Clark? It’s still highly heritable.
now paul ryan, a guy who’s never had a real job, is growing a beard.
you can have it carl.
when the roaches take over the house…leave…burn it down.
1. you’re a moron.
2. have you read or listened to clark? he’s a PROLE with a low IQ.
3. marx and engels never predicted that the greatest enemies of the proles would be the proles themselves…they missed that…but otherwise they were prophets.
both of you are analingus performing retards.
https://lionoftheblogosphere.wordpress.com/2014/04/14/parental-involvement-does-not-help-academic-achievement/#comment-39072
http://www.unz.com/gnxp/never-forget-the-genetic-confound/
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235214000762
read my comments on the same thread carl.
you’re not a marlborough like winston are you?
the putative absence of effect of parents on their kids IQs is meaningless because:
1. within any given society at any given time the variance in parenting is small, and…
2. P != G + E…that is, even if environment were everything one would still expect to find nothing…because the effect of a given environment on a given genome differs from genome to genome.
3. so far as parents have tried to make their kids geniuses…they’ve succeeded…that the range of parenting styles shows no evidence that parents can make any difference is merely due to the range not including any such parents or to few to be noticed statistically.
…too few…
hey i found this vid of the central african emperor.
i will reach my climate…it’s clean.
Actually, I prefer it when men use cool whip on my anus…tastier, and the sensation is better too.
SES affects IQ heritability in the US but not in Europe: that was the point of the post to which Carl linked.
The restriction range critique is valid but overstated by Drunkard et al.
Speaking of prison, Booty Warrior just got let back out in Kentucky in August:
I wonder what kind of environment made him like booty so much…
except there’s no way to know what the restriction of range is unless the study approximates the unethical gold standard…namely…
1. a large number of MZTs carried by randomly selected gestational surrogates and assigned to random rearing parents around the world…or if you prefer around the developed world.
2. almost all the studies have been done in children…and those studies DO show a large effect…as much as 15 points…the most famous study was from france where middle class adoptees were raised by poor families and lower class adoptees by rich families…the former’s IQs were much lower than their parents’…and the latter much higher…to the tune of 15 points.
3. no study to date has come anywhere close to approximating #1 and therefore EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM IS SHIT.
4. the modification of h^2 or lack thereof with SES says nothing about the rank order of genomes in any and all ranges of environments.
5. and contra carl-tard norms of reaction DOES explain a lot of human history…like why the germans were greasy human sacrifice practicing savages 2500 years ago, especially compared to the athenians and the persians (iranians), and are now the world’s leading exporters and much better off than the greeks…etc…or why only in the last 100 years have the jews accomplished anything worthy of note outside religious jive talk.
and italy didn’t fall when those german bikers crashed their party…no!…
up until 1600 it could still be said that italy was the most advanced country on earth.
now of course…
the euro is really the deutschmark.
not the lira.
get it?
60 years ago taiwan and nigeria were at the same level of development…really!
get it?
but however well behaved sub-saharan africa is it still has two big problems that the far east has never had:
1. all of its countries are multi-ethnic, multi-lingual, phony countries, whose borders were made up by colonial powers.
2. hbd can be a self-fulfilling prophecy. yet still, if one looks at a list of the fastest growing economies in the world…a lot of them are in sub-saharan africa.
LOLOL the Greeks and Germans and Italians of today aren’t the same people they were 1500 years ago or even 500 years ago. Who cares if Greeks were better back then LOL, the ones now clearly suck
Sure, there’s restriction of range in twin studies: you can’t put one twin in a nice, middle class adoptive home and the other in the Gobi desert. But I’m missing the path to the conclusion that estimates of heritability from twin studies are meaningless. The fact that MZ twins reared apart are often more similar than DZ twins reared together, let alone demographically matched adoptive siblings in the same household, would seem to tell us something.
Well, you could imagine different norms of reaction being selected for in different environments. As a simple example, consider a “gracile” genotype which presumes a good environment and is therefore very sensitive to environmental effects, vs. a “robust” genotype that implements a maximin strategy of optimizing for the environmental worst-case scenario. This is not a priori implausible: malaria resistance probably increases IQ near the equator, but not near the poles. (The point is sharpened by the fact that some forms of malaria resistance are positively bad for you, just less bad than malaria.) If you restricted your study to regions of disease prevalence, you could foresee ‘errors’ like the mis-attribution of disease resistance genes to intelligence. And is it even an error, really? In certain parts of the early colonial world, almost half of white Europeans ended up dead within a year due to tropical diseases, and dead men complete no Raven’s matrices.
More speculatively, radically different ways of life may tap into different cognitive traits entirely. Many foraging and pastoralist groups (and even some groups that are merely historically pastoralist) struggle with certain psychometric tasks in a way that is frankly difficult to credit, but which can’t be attributed to hostility, lack of interest or other issues of construct validity. Foragers often clock in at levels we would consider impediments to independent living, yet they seem to do just fine. (At least by their own values of “fine”.) A Pirahan and a German with IQs of 60 would not thrive in each other’s environments, but it’s only the German who could not thrive even in their own. These sorts of comparisons require a lot of caution, I think.
Even granting all that, though, I don’t understand how an appreciation of reaction norms gets one all the way to (what often seems like) radical skepticism about intelligence research. One might even discount most twin adoption studies due to the fact that the class of adopting households (representing an estimated 90% coverage region for all households) nevertheless all share certain environmental features that cannot be controlled for. We are left, however, with the fact that cognitive differences between groups tend to remain stable no matter where those groups go. The outcomes of the Chinese in Malaysia, Indians in Nigeria, or Ashkenazi Jews in the US, to pick only a few examples, would suggest that there is a good approximation to a linear norm of reaction for cognitive ability, at least for the agrarian and industrialized worlds. Given that the industrialized world is at this point pretty much mopping up all other environments, I am unsure of the significance of hypothetical reversals of cognitive fitness in these other milieux.
BUT THEY ARE THE SAME PEOPLE!
that’s what the genetic studies of contemporary and ancient remains ACTUALLY SAYS.
and the lebanese are the phoenicians.
and the tunisians are the carthaginians.
the arab conquest had very little effect on the genes of the conquered peoples.
the arab conquest.
apparently you can’t tell the difference between facts and truthiness.
no carl not radical skepticism…
the point is that there ARE studies which would be dispositive BUT psychologists are TOO FUCKING STUPID to know what they are.
the idea that the ancient greek and roman ruling class looked like dolph lundgren was invented by 19th c racists…and concluded with the mythe of the 20th century.
it’s been thoroughly discredited.
if anything blue eyes and light hair are more common in greece and italy today than they were and this as a result of the barbarian invasions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migration_Period. germans were the mexicans of the late roman empire.
and i say that as one whose 16 great great grandparents all had blue or blue-green eyes…one who was a blond until puperty and still has light golden highlighted hair…and has ZERO italian or greek ancestry…only english, irish, french, basque, and swiss…as far as i know…but that’s just by surnames…3 irish surnames among my great great grands…one swiss…one french…one basque…all the rest english.
There do not exist any studies that are dispositive and good and the same time. I suspect that they suffer from severe confounds and that their findings are spurious.
i suspect…nay, know…that you put words together but make no sense…even to yourself…
i have given what would be the dispositve study for contemporary society…the genomes of the long dead combined with their accomplishments academic or social might make for a more absolute disposition of the case.
there is at any one time an h^2 for the world as a whole and for the developed world as a whole…
no studies to date come close to estimating this.
studies have found (how consistently? not always!) that IQ and various other psychological traits have a heritability significantly different from 0.
so what?
asian carp and kudzu are “successful” in america much more than they are in their native habitat.
that is,
contra HBDers…there ARE studies which would confirm (or dis-confirm) HBD “beyond a reasonable doubt”, beyond ANY reasonable doubt,
i’m not the OJ jury when it comes to HBD.
but such studies have NOT been done.
and the extant studies aren’t only not dispositive…there are plenty of studies which DIS-confirm the claims of HBD hard liners. (“the studies were in children”, they most often say…conveniently ignoring that 99% of all IQ studies are in children.)
i’ve never said that HBD is 100% false.
what i’ve said is that:
1. the evidence for it so far is swiss cheese, and…
2. considering the political consequences of and political motivations behind HBD,
it has a higher standard to meet than other putative science…
but…
on top of that…
its achieving such “scientific” status is especially difficult…
because psychology is proximally and for the most part a pseudo-science.
3. reflecting on my own life and its trajectory…highs and lows…flights and crashes…fits and misfits…i know that despite my participation in the BGI study…i would have been “even smarter” under other circumstances…and i would have achieved more than even more…a lot more.
but then just yesterday i was looking up one of my great great grands irish surnames…
it turns out it wasn’t irish…
it was norman.
so i can claim some scandinavian ancestry via normandy and ireland.
i always suspected i was jewish…i mean scandinavian…
but no more scandinavian than that lying jew cock sucker christopher hitchens was jewish.
why would an apparently intelligent, or at least verbally intelligent, person claim to be jewish even though he wasn’t?
makes ya say hmmm.
well…makes you say.
it makes me say…
Why don’t we have any effects from parenting, or any shared environment influences for that matter? Forget trying to make their kids geniuses, things like spanking have no effect.
http://quillette.com/2015/12/01/why-parenting-may-not-matter-and-why-most-social-science-research-is-probably-wrong/
In fact, no environmental effect lasts.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028961500135X
Correct, by the 1960s, Jews were already on their way in becoming an elite group, without much discrimination. People dislike Jews, because they come across as superfluous and petty!
And interestingly, White gentiles in Meriprolestan have mimicked what Jews have been doing for a long time. Just look at the country today, it reminds you of an episode from Seinfeld.
It’s not so much that Jews have flaws, but anytime you have two racial/ethnic groups coexisting & competing for the same resources, if there is a 10+ IQ gap between them, inevitably the high IQ group will exploit the low IQ group.
It doesn’t matter if it Jews vs Gentiles or Whites vs Blacks or Indians vs Blacks or Agricultural blacks vs Pygmies or Humans vs animals or Animals vs plants. The high IQ group will always exploit the low IQ group because intelligence by definition is the ability to turn situations to your advantage, so unless the high IQ group is abnormally moral, it will exploit the dumber group’s weakness because that’s just what intelligence evolved to do. Some members of the lower IQ group will gain power by sucking up to the higher IQ group, but these tend to get labeled “Uncle Toms”
peepee keeps lying. despicable.
the iq difference is totally insufficient to explain the level of over-representation.
it would explain a 3x over-representation in various fields or lists, but no more than that.
Chartreuse
The IQ gap is insufficient to explain Jewish dominance if Jews & Gentiles are competing as individuals, yes, you’re right
But if they’re competing as GROUPS then you get more of a winner-takes-all dynamic, which in extreme historical cases has resulted in virtually 100% of the high IQ group (even the dumb ones) economically outperforming 100% of the low IQ group (even the brilliant ones). Read up on appartheid South Africa if you’re not knowledgeable about it
ok peepee.
i agree. i think.
but in that case you have to admit that group membership or affiliation is yet another factor in determining status in heterogeneous societies…yet another factor in addition to IQ…and that it is not a virtue…nor is discrimination in favor of whatever group a virtue.
so i think you would agree that a group which combined high ethno-centrism with high IQ would come to be much more over-represented at whatever than a group which merely had high IQ…that is, as long as such groups were small minorities in larger heterogeneous societies…so the ridiculous ethno-centrism of japan doesn’t help the japanese much in japan and not much outside it as overseas japanese have largely assimilated.
is that right?
’cause i’d agree with that.
but then you’d start to sound like kevin mcdonald.
and i know more about apartheid than you do…unless you’re one of the 20% of white ZAers that have left.
i was and still am very sympathetic to apartheid and the boers.
i think they’ve been treated like shit over and over again.
apartheid was NOT jim crow, and…
it was at worst de jure what latin america has been de facto for 500 years.
ZA post ’94 has been a disaster…even for blacks.
de klerk’s interview on charlie rose is illuminating as are the docs on terre blanche.
but apartheid was de jure discrimination. so the very smartest of the 80% of ZAers who were black had no chance.
the jews in the US have nothing like that.
PP discounts Jewish tribalism in assisting them to gain power.
the movie is despicable for two other reasons.
1. a jewish athlete is rare.
2. jews (that is, Jews with four jewish grandparents) are easily recognized by their appearance…at least by me, and the combination of their surname and appearance is dispositive 99% of the time…if someone has a german or slavic surname but doesn’t look german or slavic…looks jewish.
brendan fraser is a goy. is he not?
His ancestry includes Irish, Scottish, German, Czech, and French Canadian.
why “french canadian”? are a lot of them part native? metis?
Most French Canadians have no visible Amerindian ancestry.
I think Hollywood likes casting Gentiles as Jews because they want folks to believe race is just a social construction & would be especially offended by the idea that Jews are a race with a physical phenotype
Although Israel treats Jews as a genetic category, Jews probably don’t want to be thought of that way in the West because of where such thinking has lead in the past. That’s probably why Jews were instrumental
in marginalizing HBD, despite a few Jews like Jensen (who is half-Jewish, not a quarter) being instrumental in unsuccessfully trying to bring it back
Actually Jensen was only a quarter Jewish as you’ve been saying
Arthur R. Jensen was born in 1923 in San Diego, California, where his father owned a lumber and building-supplies business. His paternal grandparents, the Jensens, were immigrants from Copenhagen, Denmark. On his mother’s side, Jensen’s grandfather was German. His maternal grandmother came from a Polish Jewish family. Both families disapproved of the marriage across religious lines, and the couple left Berlin and put down new roots in the San Diego area. Fluent in Polish, his grandmother was selected to greet the world-famous pianist Ignacy (Jan) Paderewski when he came to San Diego. Early on, Jensen noted how the dour demeanor of his Danish relatives contrasted with the fun-loving atmos phere of his mother’s side of the family.
right. the “metis” are apparently from western canada.
and “french” canadians are really just french speaking canadians as the quebecois include a lot of irish and germans…or so says wikipedia.
Indigenous admixture found in French Canadians are generally those living in Western Canada. Whites with native ancestry are not very common in the Eastern Front of Canuckistan. Manitoba and any place west of it, is where Metis are common.
that is french speaking canadians are a mixture of french and a significant amount of other european nationalities.
the french candians are an interesting case of hbd.
the so called “cajuns” are like the red legs…poor.
the same goes for the french speakers in the far north of maine…one of the poorest states in the union corrected for cost of living.
and why are the montreal canadiens like the yankees, the celtics, and the green bay packers are rolled into one.
It seems the worst of the French came to the New World.
such a tiny world.
Sorry guy, but I’m on vacation. You can’t expect great scholarship every single day.
that wasn’t what i meant…
what does the word “cynicism” mean?
Cynicism is when you think someone has an ulterior motive. For example, if a rich person gives money to charity and you say they did it for the publicity–that’s cynicism.
1 point
out of 10.
bongo is too busy tossing his filipino lady boy’s salad.
she’s Thai actually.
peepee has been thoroughly brainwashed.
The film shows the despicable levels of anti-Semitism that existed in the 1950s before Jews used their high verbal IQs to transform the culture by dominating the media and academia.
yeah, right, it’s just their verbal IQ peepee…couldn’t be their etho-centrism and ethnic networking…no!…heaven forbid!
so once again the jews have duped the stupid goys like peepee into thinking that jews are and always have been victims and that their very recent “success” is all due to their virtue of high verbal IQ.
peepee should be gassed…just like a cockroach.
yeah, right, it’s just their verbal IQ peepee…couldn’t be their etho-centrism and ethnic networking…no!…heaven forbid!
so once again the jews have duped the stupid goys like peepee into thinking that jews are and always have been victims and that their very recent “success” is all due to their virtue of high verbal IQ.
I said their success was due to their high verbal IQs. I never said it was due ONLY to their high verbal IQs. I’m quite aware that they also act in their ethnic interests, as I tried to explain to LOTB.
http://mondoweiss.net/2007/05/30_years_ago_ne
we see this annoying (but true) idea that success in life is entirely predetermined by college, and that real-world intelligent behavior is irrelevant.
not entirely even in les etats unis merdeux…
and the extent to which this is true depends on the time and the place.
so in canuckistan which requires no tests for its college admissions…the dumbest and pushiest and most obedient and striverish advance…
canada has the stupidest elite of any developed country.
but…one can see clearly here that peepee’s worldview is just jew cock sucking.
peepee loves and worships jewish cock…
not just jensen’s 1/4 jewish cock.
pumpkin person should change her blog’s name to…
ilovejewishcockinallmyholes.com
LOL! Your talent for wordplay shows a very high verbal IQ
Dude, I was making fun of Jorgeous
more like making fun of yourself.
your thinking such language un-sophisticated shows what an utterly sophistical prole you are.
LOLOL so much witty repartee, must be like watching Ali vs. Frazier, assuming you’re not the same person
we are the same being. just different persons. Bucephalus was the Holy Ghost.
Since when does appealing to the lowest common denominator in humor equate to having a high verbal IQ? There’s… literally nothing clever in what this pathetic anti-semite said. Chartreuse may think PP wants to suck Jewish cock, but I think you just want to suck his.
anti-semite?
what’s that?
semites include arabs and some ethiopians…all those who speak semitic languages.
in fact the term was coined in 19th c germany by some member of the bayreuth circle to distinguish hating jews for their religion from hating jews for their race.
you’re just another JEW COCK SUCKER.
why do jews get a special pseudo-scientific sounding sesquipedalianism for those who know that they’re cockroaches?
i’m not an anti-semite.
i hate jews.
The fact that you’re selectively and inconsistently anti-Semitic doesn’t mean you aren’t anti-Semitic.
Enlighten me, though: what exactly makes me a Jew cock sucker? Own up to your words. Prove your assertions. What evidence do you have that I consider them any differently from any other race? Frankly, you’re pulling it out of your pathetic ass.
And what exactly is your beef with Jewish people anyway?
1. jews are richer and more powerful for their numbers than any other group.
2. this is NOT explained by their higher mean IQ. just like their representation at america’s most elite schools is similarly not explained by their higher mean IQ.
3. despite this they never cease to portray themselves as victims…look at what happened to rick sanchez.
4. their fortunes are never made in productive industries, but only in finance, mass media, fashion, entertainment, etc. google and facebook derive 99% of their revenues from advertising…they’re media companies…michael dell was just a businessman not a technical savant like bill gates.
i object to #1 for the same reason that filipinos and malays and thais object to the overseas chinese, east africans object to indians, native americans object to un-mixed europeans in latin america, blacks object to whites in s africa and zimbabwe, etc.
when one small minority has such disproportionate influence the rest lose their sovereignty and right to self-determination…e.g. the iraq war…and whether or not they deserve their wealth and power is irrelevant.
there’s a big valley in peru which is still owned by the same spanish family 500 years after it was granted them and the natives who live their still pay them rent.
the very idea of the multi-ethnic state where each ethnicity “gets what it deserves”…
is totally ABSURD…and AMERICAN…that is STUPID SHIT and LIES motivated by GREED and PROLINESS.
israel is 35% ashkenazi and non-ashkenazi jews are distinguished in the west too especially considering their much smaller numbers in the west…
yet 67 years after independence more israelis are emigrating than immigrating and israel is still pretty poor compared to western europe…
there is the cutting tools maker ISCAR (now part of Berkshire Hathaway) and there’s the generic drug maker TEVA, but other than that the israelis haven’t shown themselves to be world beaters…
that is,
had a group of 6 million western europeans settled the same area they’d likely have a better economy by now…
high verbal IQ isn’t sufficient to build a german or swedish or dutch level economy.
and in that same 67 years taiwan has joined the developed world yet it was equal to nigeria at the beginning; 67 years is PLENTY OF TIME.
of course israel has had to spend an in-ordinate amount on its military…or has it?…how much has this spending been subsidized by the US?…
and so far as military spending is an excuse for economic stagnation…
it’s an excuse for the soviet union’s slowed growth in the 80s…
though IN FACT the soviet union was still growing all the way up to its disintegration and…
1. had it not been for a group of jewish future oligarchs, yeltsin would have lost to the communists democratically.
2. russia has NOT grown since the dissolution of the soviet union at a faster rate than under the commies…but life expectancy and the birth rate have imploded…
Why does Jewish people’s higher mean IQ fail to explain their preeminence in prestigious universities? And even so, why does it matter? If pure IQ fails to explain, then likely the source of success is IQ + culture, i.e. a driving work ethic. What’s wrong with that? Or are you subtly implying that there’s some coordinated Jewish conspiracy driving world events, and subtly influencing university admissions?
How original.
On the subject of victimhood, do you really believe that Jewish people have no claim to it? That’s a bit stupid. Hatred of Jewish people has run thick in many parts of the world for thousands of years. And while I’m sure you see this as well-justified hatred, you can’t really make the claim that it doesn’t warrant some degree of victimhood status. In the 20th century alone, the Jewish people faced attempted genocide, and their state faced attack from every one of its neighbors (this latter fact might explain one of the reasons Israel has not progressed as quickly as would apparently be assumed based on its people’s high mean IQ).
But anyways… that’s all beside the point, because I don’t think you’ve been honest. Sure, you might resent Jewish people because they’re powerful and you’re pathetic, but that doesn’t explain why you spend hours everyday spewing hate on a blog full of people who don’t like you. There’s something more to your hate than what you say.
Does anyone know what mental issues chartreuse has? I ask this in all seriousness.
typical,
you explain hatred of jews with “mental issues” (and “conspiracy theories”).
what are “mental issues”?
and supposing i were “afflicted” with such…
so what?
what does that have to do with anything?
and “conspiracy”?
no conspiracy is necessary.
as i’ve already commented multiple times.
it’s a hackneyed gesture of anti-anti-semites to claim (falsely) that anti-semites are “conspiracy theorists”.
conspiracy theorists are ridiculous…just like crazy people…thus the enemy is marginalized and dismissed…
you are what i mean by a jew cock sucker…
or you’re a jew.
you’re tiresome.
the bottom line of the income statement is:
universalism is a LIE…and at least so far as HBDers are particularists, then HBD is TRUE.
HBD may have more truth in it than that…but it’s yet to be proved…at least to my statisfaction.
in all seriousness…
you’re a very UN-serious person.
and thankfully i’ve never been psychotic…nor has any ancestor of mine…at least for four generations…before that i don’t know…
but…
the two most un-equal countries in the developed world are…
1. israel
2. the US
you might find this enlightening…but only might:
there are at least three interpretations of this figure…supposing it’s veridical…but all are damning:
1. there really are more crazy people in the US and despite hybrid vigor american society makes people crazy…(or, for the HBDers, hybridization makes crazy.)
2. america is a very business-centric society and psychiatry is a business…that is, americans aren’t actually crazier…they’re just more likely to be suckered by the business of psychiatry.
3. america is a very conformist society and “crazy” is a much broader category in america than elsewhere.
BUT WHICHEVER IT IS…THE RESULT IS THAT THE VERY UN-EQUAL AND BUSINESS-CENTRIC AMERICAN SOCIETY IS ABLE TO MARGINALIZE ITS MISFITS AS “CRAZY” BETTER THAN ANY OTHER SOCIETY…
AND…
IN PART BECAUSE ITS MISFITS REALLY ARE CRAZY…
OR RATHER…
ARE DRIVEN MAD…
tenn,
how can you even see the computer screen while sucking so much jew cock?
do you have a periscope?
but i am currently high on hydrocodone, oxycontin, and EtOH.
the former two for my thumb. the last for fun.
but to pre-empt peepee…
according to peepee i am…
an obsessive compulsive schizophrenic autistic homosexual alcoholic.
only the last is true.
my God, i should phone guinness. i’m the “world’s craziest person”.
In all seriousness, tenn, the problem is not the average Jew, but neocon Zionist Jews. Doc zakheim, wolfowitz, and several other high-ranking neocon Jews hold BOTH Israeli and American citizenship, ffs. they’re using the U.S. of course, the U.S. is evil anyway, so maybe it cancels out…?
and obvious but NEVER stated explicitly in “polite” company…in shit-merica…
so far as the jews’ outsized wealth and power is due to their virtues…the comparably meagre wealth and power of gentiles for their numbers must be due to their vices.
whoever apologizes for the jews condemns the gentiles.
but consistency isn’t the forte of philosemites.
right?
the problem isn’t kudzu.
it’s just a few kudzu plants.
even those who repudiate jew cock suckers are mostly sucking jew cocks.
jews have a lot more to apologize for than have anti-semites.
stetind said:
mmmmm…jewish cock is delish…especially with hummus.
u wot?
we’re more alike than you think. i regret the spread of Christian (so basically Jewish) values. Europe should still be pagan and the u.s. Should still belong to the native Americans.
I don’t resort to accusing you of being mental to marginalize you, but rather because I’m convinced you are. You spend hours everyday spewing irrational bile on this blog (and probably other places as well). Socially well-adjusted people don’t do things like that.
Furthermore, the provocations you’ve presented, namely that Jewish people are rich and have an outsized impact on world affairs, fail completely to explain your inordinate reaction of dedicating a huge portion of your life to ranting at people who find you sad and small.
And to think you blame American society for ostracizing you… Maybe if you just grew up and dedicated your time spent ranting instead to productivity, you might make something of yourself. But then maybe not.
Meriprolestan remains to be one of the most socially dysfunctional of all the industrialized nations, symptomatic of its stark income inequality. Then adding more toxin like multiculturalism of its uneducated immigrants and the black underclass, who don’t resemble anything remotely of their rulers — a pressure cooker is set to burst within a decade into a 3rd world playground. I mark my words!
just lies from tenn.
1. don’t spend more than 30 m per day on any blog and do no commenting for days.
2. american society has ostracized me?
i’ve never said that.
3. you’re both stupid and crazy and a liar tenn.
and you’re evil tenn. you’re a sociopath.
only sociopaths value being “socially well adjusted”.
america is 100% pure shit.
It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.
Jiddu Krishnamurti
unless you’re a sociopath.
and you are tenn.
Tenn is an abbreviation for Tennessee.
if you’re from or now reside in Tennessee…
that’s all you needed to say…
to be summarily and justly dismissed as an evil moron.
fifteen men on a dead man’s chest…
yo ho ho and a bottle of rum…
drink and the devil had done with the rest….
Chartreuse,
Tenn is not evil or sociopathic, he is simply a good person who has respect & compassion for Jews & gets offended by antisemitism
“Meriprolestan”
LOL! Your talent for wordplay shows a very high verbal IQ!
peepee thought…
“what can i say that will assure ‘Tenn’ will keep commenting and yet not offend my charlie sheen commenter, jorge, too much?”
you’re transparently evil peepee.
whoever values “adjustment” or “adaptation” per se, necessarily makes an idol of his particular society…particular in place and in time…
and is a sociopath ipso facto.
that is, “good” and “evil” for him are “what’s ‘good’ for me”.
winning!
peepee thought…
“what can i say that will assure ‘Tenn’ will keep commenting and yet not offend my charlie sheen commenter, jorge, too much?”
This is the fastest growing HBD blog of ALL TIME. Don’t for one second overestimate your value here. I have 15,000 readers a month. To quote Beyoncé I could have another you in a minute Matter of fact, he’ll be here in a minute
whoever values “adjustment” or “adaptation” per se, necessarily makes an idol of his particular society…particular in place and in time…
and is a sociopath ipso facto.
How disappointing.
Nobody values “adaptation” except for me. To assume people adapt because they value adaptation is to assume free-will. What people, value, by definition, are their goals. Your goal is to advance your own internal moral code. You are trying to adapt to your own nonconformist goals every bit as much as some ruthless greedy conformist sociopath is trying to adapt to his society idolizing goals.
Adaptation is not something we can choose to value or not value. It’s like choosing not to value choice. Every decision we make, however trivial or profound, is an adaptation.
Quite frankly, I’m more bemused than offended. You’re powerless, Jorge, so your boorishness can’t hurt anyone, and can only make you more wretched. No use being offended. I’m a tad staggered, however, to find that there even are people like you left. It’s a bit surreal.
Moving on, — congratulations. You’ve fully convinced me of what I’m sure Pumpkin and the other commentators caught onto long ago: you aren’t worth arguing with. Apparently, I’m a sociopath because I’m not racist pond scum. Pumpkin’s evil because he make kind to his commenters. Yea. . . no point in arguing with that attitude. Leastwise not in regards to your pet issue.
thanks for the “quite frankly”. are you a girl? or do you just want to be a girl?
and i’m “powerless”? oh no! i’m like almost everyone…therefore i can’t have an opinion…might makes right?
YOU’RE DESPICABLE. YOU’RE EVIL. YOU’RE A MORON.
and…
if you’d read my comments you’d know i’m an ANIT-RACIST…very unlike peepee…but you can’t think and therefore dismiss opinions which you don’t like as those of “racist”, “crazy”, “conspiracy theorists”, etc.
YOU DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT A “RACIST” IS.
and i thought jews weren’t a race…
but again…consistency isn’t a forte of jews and their fellators…in fact, truth simply isn’t something they value…they value being cool in a prole-merican way and being rich and powerful…in a prole-merican way…but the truth? it’s totally irrelevant to them.
the bottom line:
you should be gassed.
beyonce?
jesus fucking christ?
not only are you 13 years old.
you’re non-white.
…
as i’ve already observed multiple times…
…
beyonce?
seriously?
beyonce?
tards gonna tard.
proles gonna prole.
PP no longer claims that her blog is the biggest HBD blog…she’s been forced to call it the fastest-growing. And probably much of the amusement value (which is what drives the blog’s popularity, not PP’s calibre of research) is derived from Videla et al.
Tenn, you are wicked and sadistic and should be civilly committed.
anyway…
i am impossible to offend so much i will be driven away…
i will simply change aliases…
from duke to mugabe to videla to chartreuse…
..and now…
…just maybe…
to j. b. b.
Off topic but I’m on my way to get drunk. Taxi on its way to take me to the bar
have fun.
take ALCAR beforehand in the future. it’s cheap and it might be preventative of damage.
off topic but i just spent 6 hours in the ER after i almost cut my thumb off chopping wood.
sorry bongo, i’m not a lumbersexual…but i do have a wood stove…two woodstoves actually.
poor thing
10 stitches, but something curious…no pain…none until about 8 hours later.
and unlike jimmy fallon’s finger episode this had nothing to do with alcohol.
No, I felt all the pain instead. I act as a kind of buffer for chartreuse.
but peepee’s idea of “winning” is LOSING…
all you ever need to know you learned from me…
everything changed after 1914-1918 for those who noticed at the time and those who have noticed since…and changed forever.
i appraise peepee as cordelia appraised charles…they appraised one another in the same way…exactly.
but one was wise and the other a fool.
which one?
what
profound
wisdom
fr0m
jorge
PP have you posted estimates or measurements of your own IQ somewhere in the archives, or is that a closely guarded secret?
https://pumpkinperson.com/2015/11/03/my-chronometric-scores/
Thanks, somehow I forgot that post pegged you to actual scores. It matches with my rough intuition that says you and I are about at the same level; however, I don’t know how much both of our IQs have diverged from their younger scores. I feel dumber and less active now, but I don’t know how much of that is attributed to my general age group and how much is my own personal failings.
I also saw a post on reddit where the summary claimed that social isolation had profound effects including IQ – I wonder if I have ever dropped a few points this way – but maybe the report reader got the details wrong or the experiment was incorrect. I haven’t read the actual report: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/531897cde4b0fa5080a9b19e/t/555601d9e4b0849a888ed857/1431699929973/toward-a-neurology-of-loneliness.pdf
Pumpkin,
How much Flynn Effect has there been since the 1980s? (Have I asked you this before)??
It doesn’t seem like it would be the same .3 IQ points per year as it was during the middle 20th century
On the U.S. Wechsler scales the same 3 point
a decade Flynn effect has continued since the 1980s, but in parts of Europe the Flynn effect has reportedly now ended or even reversed…too soon to say for sure
http://www.iapsych.com/articles/pietschnig2015.pdf