After weeks of incredible busyness at work, it feels so good to be on vacation…all by myself…packed up and moved to a huge suburban home for the week, with nothing behind it but trees, darkness, and the moon.
Tonight I will have a quality dinner, followed by delicious homemade hot chocolate made from actual chocolate bars with homemade whip cream as I watch a horror film on a huge screen TV. One commenter claims this is “prole” but he lacked the sophistication to realize it’s only prole if you see the wires. A floating TV is very elegant.
Tomorrow I will get up early, put on a warm winter jacket and sip strong tea as I sit on the outdoor deck watching the unique Northern Canadian sun rise with the most glorious shades of pink and orange.
And then I will walk the streets enjoying all the Christmas festivities, the magnificent Christmas trees wrapped in lights, and all the huge pure white statues of virgin Marry on every Church lawn. No one has more Christmas spirit than small town Canadians.
the use of “home” in place of house is like the use of “wealthy” in place of “rich”.
it’s prole.
whose house is it peepee?
…”home” in place of “house”…
in fact the less prole will even refer to their apartment as a house.
it’s like mis-pronouncing “espresso” or “etc” as “ex-presso” or “ex cetera”…
or the worst…
forming the possessive singular genitive for a noun ending in a sibilant with a single ‘…
rather than an ‘s.
like Ulysses’ or Xerxes’ or Jesus’ or even Sanchez’…
there was more than one Xerxes. there were Xerxes-es.
the genitive and plural in english are IDENTICAL PHONO-LOGICALLY.
america is so prole even it’s MLA displays this gaucherie.
i could make a comment on your use, above, of “it’s” as a possessive, but i think quoting tom lehrer (on kissinger’s nobel peace prize) is enough: “this makes satire redundant.”
indeed a MISTAKE.
mea culpa mea maxima culpa.
BUT THERE’S A REASON FOR IT…
namely when i type i edit simultaneously and was beginning with “it’s” CORRECTLY…
then changed my mind.
i rare;y re-read what i type after i’m done typing.
i was reading one of my brilliant comments of shoe’s blog and i used “who’s” when i should have used “whose”.
QUEL DOMMAGE!
hey you’d get a kick out of Best of Enemies.
vidal came from a superior social background to buckley and he was smarter…
even though he was a faggot and never went to college.
i used to be impressed with buckley…not so much anymore…he was clearly just an actor/performer and not very convincing…all style and no substance.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
The only real advantage of ”jews” about gentiles is their complete absence of morality among them. But PP is too suburban to realise it.
two people i assumed had some jewish ancestry who didn’t…at least according to wikipedia…
1. Tom Snyder
2. Ted Forstmann
maybe it helps to look jewish.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/humor-sapiens/201312/comedians-smarts-humor-and-creativity
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289615001397
•
The intelligence of the residents of the states was associated with economic indices of the states.
•
States whose residents had higher IQ had stronger economies and higher economic growth.
•
States whose residents had higher IQ had lower unemployment rates and less credit card debt.
•
States whose residents had higher IQ had lower foreclosure rates during the economic crisis of 2008.
Uh…reaction norms? ;3
Uh…norms of reaction? ;4
;5
”right answer” 🙂
LOL. Reaction norms fail to explain fucking anything, dude. Give it up.
In the meanwhile, IQ explains everything. See: Hajnal Line, national outcomes etc. etc.
“A floating TV is very elegant.”
Is that floating TV still elegant as its walking our of your house?
=^)