With Halloween only weeks away, it’s time for scary topics.
Hannibal Lecter is the fictional evil psychopath from the Silence of the Lambs movies, who uses his 150+ IQ to harass law enforcement experts by paying close attention to their accents, and accusing them of being proles.
He actually reminds me quite a bit of our very own Jorge Videla/Mugabe, who often uses these avatars.
It would have been fascinating if Videla/Mugabe really did look like the second avatar, and was actually some genius black guy driven mad by resentment over HBD, but in real life, he claims to be of an upper class WASP background, and claims to look like this:
Of course, unlike Hannibal Lecter, Videla is not an evil psychopath, but he uses his 160 IQ (1560 on the old SAT) to harass us HBD experts for entertainment, and say horrific shocking things, and Videla also accuses HBDers (people who believe in behavioral genetics) of being proles (low class), and pays special attention to the accents of HBDers (he for examples believes the great Charles Murray’s accent is affectation to hide a prole background):
I always liked Murray’s original way of speaking, and have sometimes found myself trying to imitate it when having intellectual discussions with friends, but the thought that it could be an affectation is pretty funny.
It’s understandable why criminal Hannibal Lecter would hate the FBI, but it’s strange that 160 IQ Videla/Mugabe, would so hate people who believe IQ is primarily genetic. You would think someone with such a high IQ would want to believe it was genetic, so it’s fascinating that he’s devoted much of his life to declaring war on those who do.
I have my own theories about what motivates him, but I don’t really know.
Pumpkin Person 
I love Charles Murray. He and Paul Fussell and David Brooks’ “Bobos in Paradise: The New Upper Class and How They Got There” is all you need to know about today’s American culture (well, maybe also David Hackett Fisher’s “Albion’s Seed”).
Anyhow, do you think Robert Mugabe/Jorge Videla is actually a native English speaker? I wanna know what you think before I give any further analysis.
Anyhow, do you think Robert Mugabe/Jorge Videla is actually a native English speaker? I wanna know what you think before I give any further analysis.
He claims to be as American as apple pie. He claims his great grandmother or step-great grandmother was the unsinkable Molly Brown: the most famous survivor of the Titanic. And his father is supposedly a famous Harvard lawyer.
oh dear God peepee. you’re making shit up.
my dad is total loser. a TOTAL loser. although, in his defense, to a great extent he CHOSE to be a loser. he rejected all of the opportunities afforded him by that Harvard degree.
he graduated from Harvard College not Harvard Law School.
he applied to HLS but was rejected.
no peepee.
1/16th of my genes ARE from Margaret Tobin Brown and another 1/16th from J J Brown, and my dad’s uncle was married to one of Marshall Field III’s daughters, and my surname is as RC as it gets.
so what?
it hasn’t helped me a wit in America, or rather JEW-SOUTHERN-TRASH-merica.
the thing is retarded judah…
i speak english….
i speak ONLY english…
i was kicked out of french class in my sophomore year of hs…
you on the other hand…
you have no language AT ALL…
peepee is such a sociopath…but i’ll bight…i’ll swallow…his poison pill.
i’m no more from an upper class background, in the american sense, than the current duke of leinster, who is a gardener.
and i’m hardly a WASP.
my surname is somewhat famous in RC circles.
but it is true that i am a direct descendent of William Bradford.
and on my mother’s side it’s all british surnames with one irish, one french, and one spanish surname as far as i know.
every one of my great great great grandparents had blue or blue-green eyes.
my most recent ancestor to immigrate to america, immigrated in the late 19th c from liverpool.
but for the smart, the socially smart, it should be obvious that class is everything, and most people, and especially the nouveau riche, are very insecure about it, so when one simply lets them assume, they will very often assume one is from a higher class than he is in fact.
i’ve never lied about my background, yet peepee has assumed i’m someone i’m not.
this says much more about peepee than me.
but for the smart, the socially smart, it should be obvious that class is everything,
You’re an American. What the hell do you know about class? A high class American is an oxymoron.
compare the duke of leinster to the dukes of westminster and cadogan.
why are the latter the richest british-born men in britain?
is it virtue?
no.
it’s just that they had the good fortune of having their estates in what became greater london.
that
is
it.
peepee thinks he’s living in a meritocracy. a useful idiot.
You still don’t get it even after more than a year of reading my blog. You think the world is less meritocratic today than it was for our ancestors 4 million years ago? You don’t think luck, & cheating & evil occurred back then.
No matter how unfair the World is, the smart rise to the top because intelligence is the mental ability to adapt to any situation, even the most unfair one.
That’s why brain size tripled in the last 4 million years. Because on average the smartest prospered & it’s still going on today, though we’ve largely managed to turn conventional natural selection off through safety nets & birth control
No matter what the system, it’s always a meritocracy. Anything else is impossible
there’s nothing to get peepee. as i and misdreavus have observed countless times, YOU HAVE A LOW IQ.
1. you don’t get it.
2. you’re a moron.
3. you’re evil.
4. you belong behind bars, and undoubtedly will eventually end up there.
http://fallaciesfiles.weebly.com/the-isought-fallacy.html
and you’re a liar.
you have presented evidence on your own blog that “the smart always rise top the top” is a…
LIE.
many smart people were exterminated by hitler.
hitler must have been smarter than all those jews he killed.
right peepee?
you fucking fucktarded piece of shit.
there’s nothing to get peepee. as i and misdreavus have observed countless times, YOU HAVE A LOW IQ.
The only reason you think Misdreavous is brilliant is because he’s a huge fan of yours and shares your politics. Prior to that, you did nothing but trash him.
Misdreavous is a brilliant guy on most issues, but when he tried to debate me on statistics he could not land a single punch, to put it politely.
On the other hand, when he came here to debate ethnic genetic interests, he handled himself with great competence.
If you want to show your high IQ, you’re more than welcome to take the heritability test:
https://pumpkinperson.com/2015/04/02/get-a-degree-in-heritability/
1. you don’t get it.
2. you’re a moron.
3. you’re evil.
4. you belong behind bars, and undoubtedly will eventually end up there.
I’m no more evil and moronic than Darwin. All I’m doing is repeating his theory & applying it to modern times. You’re just too congenitally mentally ill to have a civil discussion.
and you’re a liar.
you have presented evidence on your own blog that “the smart always rise top the top” is a…
LIE.
Strawman argument. I never said or implied the smart ALWAYS rise to the top, however they rise to the top often enough for natural selection to have roughly tripled brain size in 4 million years. I see no reason to think intelligence has become significantly less important since.
not only did he land a punch he knocked you out peepee. but you’re so utterly fucking retarded you couldn’t understand his criticisms.
there’s no civil discussion to be had with an evil person peepee, let alone a low iq evil person.
you don’t understand darwin peepee…not at all…your blog is a joke.
as i said:
1. you have a low iq.
2. you’re a sociopath.
3. you will eventually end up in jail.
i found a picture of you.
but you did say that peepee.
in just a few comments above.
fucktard.
‘tards gonna tard.
peepee.
there is no general ability to adapt or to do anything at all.
human civilization varies ENORMOUSLY across time and place.
and civilization itself is very RECENT to the human experience.
YES PEEPEEE!!!
THE PEOPLE WHO MAKE IT TO THE TOP IN THE US, NORWAY, LIBERIA, ETC.
AREN’T THE SAME SORT OF PEOPLE.
ARE…
NOT…
GET IT?
FUCKTARD?
YOU CANNOT SPEAK CONCEPTS INTO EXISTENCE.
BECAUSE YOU CAN SAY “ABILITY TO ADAPT” DOES NOT MEAN THAT THERE IS ANY SUCH THING.
GET IT?
FUCKTARD?
not only did he land a punch he knocked you out peepee. but you’re so utterly fucking retarded you couldn’t understand his criticisms.
His criticisms were systematically ripped to shreds. He did not understand that simple regression worked in both directions. He did not understand that the correlation between two variables is the product of their factor loadings and you were incapable of understanding that also btw. He did not seem to grasp what a normalized Z score is.
On the other hand, he performed quite well when discussing ethnic genetic interests and clearly knows a lot about biology, and I don’t doubt he has a very high IQ.
there’s no civil discussion to be had with an evil person peepee, let alone a low iq evil person.
Then get the hell out.
AND THE PEOPLE WHO MADE IT TO THE TOP IN THE STONE AGE AND WHO STILL MAKE IT TO THE TOP IN THE WILDS OF THE AMAZON OR SENTINEL ISLAND OR THE HIGHLANDS OF NEW GUINEA ARE…
NOT…
THE SAME…
AS THE PEOPLE WHO MAKE IT TO THE TOP IN THE REST OF THE WORLD.
JEWS NOW DOMINATE EVERY FIELD THAT REALLY MATTERS IN THE US.
BUT THEY TEND TO BE SHORT AND SCRAWNY.
THEY’D HAVE BEEN THE VERY FIRST EATEN BY A SABRE TOOTH TIGER.
GET IT?
FUCKTARD?
IT’S BEEN 67 FUCKING YEARS AND ISRAEL IS STILL A SHIT HOLE COMPARED TO WESTERN EUROPE. AND YET JEWS ARE 36% OF THE RICHEST 400 AMERICANS.
GET IT?
FUCKTARD?
peepee.
there is no general ability to adapt or to do anything at all.
Not necessarily a general ability, but an overall mental ability. You expose people to a wide range of problems, and some people will only be able to solve 10%, others will be able to solve 20%, others 30%. We don’t have to give these individual differences a name like intelligence, but we can if we want to.
YOU CANNOT SPEAK CONCEPTS INTO EXISTENCE.
BECAUSE YOU CAN SAY “ABILITY TO ADAPT” DOES NOT MEAN THAT THERE IS ANY SUCH THING
You are such a disappointment. I had so badly hoped you were as smart as you claim to be but all you can do is repeat Stephen Jay Gould’s trivial reification argument from 1981. You’re not an original thinker. I guess the Promethean was right. SAT doesn’t measure intelligence above 1400.
they weren’t ripped to shreds peepee.
he stopped arguing with you when he realized how low your iq was.
i on the other hand am much kinder than him.
i’ve given you so much. pearls to swine i guess. but dismissing people as simply incapable is so un-kind. alas poor peepee, if ever a one deserved such dismissal, it is you.
you’re walcott. misdreavus is marciano.
there is NO general cognitive ability peepee.
and also,
1. there is no bigfoot
2. there is no loch ness monster
they weren’t ripped to shreds peepee. he stopped arguing with you when he realized how low your iq was.
His arguments were completely ripped to shreds. He had wrongly assumed that since he has a STEM degree from one of the most prestigious universities in the World, he would be able to mop the floor with me, but instead the exact opposite happened.
But he is a brilliant guy, he just made the mistake of arrogantly assuming he understood a concept he hadn’t grasped.
And your grasp of statistics is pretty mediocre too, btw, which is why you’re unable to pass the heritability test I gave, and why you were unable to answer a basic question I posed about the h in h^2.
there is NO general cognitive ability peepee.
and also,
1. there is no bigfoot
2. there is no loch ness monster
You’re too dumb to understand the difference between general ability and ability in general.
Videla is correct to say that Israel is a country on the level of Greece and its Middle Eastern neighbors, who don’t get any luxurious welfare packages from the USA.
And yes, the good ol’ USA is not even on par with Canada, in terms of educational standards and civic engagement, let alone comparing it to Western Europe.
The real problem with Israel is that America gets suckered into fighting Israel’s wars for them, which costs America almost all its blood, treasure & political capital.
Netanyahu lobbied congress to get America to invade Iraq as did the super powerful AIPAC with the pro-Israel media beating the drums for war (i.e. even liberals like Judith Miller & Thomas Friedman of the New York Times, Peter Bienart of the New Republic etc, etc).
And when those Ivy League academics , who wrote “The Israel Lobby” tried to point this out, they were labeled anti-Semites & blacked out by the media. For that reason, super geniuses like Videla & Misdreavus are not 100% wrong in being cynical about Israel
Robert Lindsay is another super genius who is critical of Jews & Israel. Maybe it takes an IQ above a certain level? I find the lower IQ Gentiles all worship Jews: Cuckservatives.
I’m also cynical about American involvement with Israel and the Middle East also. I read the “Israel Lobby” when it came out, the summer after I graduated from high school. I just don’t extend my cynicism to hatred for all Jewish people.
“THE PEOPLE WHO MAKE IT TO THE TOP IN THE US, NORWAY, LIBERIA, ETC.
AREN’T THE SAME SORT OF PEOPLE.”
What utter bullshit
http://www.unz.com/jman/demography-is-destiny/
IGNORED FACTS:
Nutrition & prenatal care are already largely ruled out as causally relevant since they fall under shared environment.
FOR ALL TRAITS SHARED ENVIRONMENT IS ZERO!!
and YES, of all “celebrities” the one which people have most often told me i resembled WAS Andrew McCarthy.
i’v also been told i look like john cleese, william hurt, james van der beek, …
i am 100% western european, 6′ 1 1/4″ with blue eyes and light brown/dishwater blond hair, and a ginormous head…on very broad shoulders…and an absurdly long torso.
these details would only turn on non-whites, like peepee, but i would STAND OUT in any crowd of white people.
but by my own conceited judgement i look a lot like a blue-eyed light haired cristoph metzelder.
i am 100% western european, 6′ 1 1/4″ with blue eyes and light brown/dishwater blond hair, and a ginormous head…on very broad shoulders…and an absurdly long torso.
these details would only turn on non-whites, like peepee, but i would STAND OUT in any crowd of white people.
LOL! Even if I were gay like you, why the hell would I be attracted to someone with a long torso and stunted legs? You even admitted you have the body of a chimp.
Misdreavous is probably interested though.
How big is your ‘ed?
and YES. murray is a prole, who’s taken great pains to disguise it.
peggy noonan is another.
what should one think of a man who affects a posh accent and preaches “meritocracy”?
it’s easy.
HBD/scientific racism/scientific classism is PROLE.
you might read lion’s post on “the rich vote democrat. it’s true.”
FALSE CONSCIOUSNESS explains HBDers along with stupidity.
HEIL HITLER! (not meant to be a joke.)
with very few exceptions, the truth is and has always been unpopular, UN-ADAPTIVE.
those who worship adpatability worship THE LIE/SATAN (again not meant as a joke.).
civilization, heierarchy, some more powerful than others, some having power over others is…
necessarily…
essentially…
VIOLENT.
the rich don’t put the poor in gas chambers, but they shorten their lives all the same.
there’s a name for people like peepee, satanist.
You’re a fucking nut.
You hate Jews but they’ve worked harder against HBD more than any other group (with a few exceptions like Hans Eysenck, Steven Pinker).
I don’t even think you’re native-born American.
I suspect Videla opposes both HBD and Jews for the same reason. He’s a Marxist. Even though many Jews are Marxists, including Marx himself, Marxists don’t like Jews because they’re rich and they don’t like HBD because they see it as unfairly blaming the victims of an unjust capitalist society that was never a level playing field to begin with.
oh dear FUCKING GOD…
this shows YET AGAIN…
that the goyim today CANNOT EVEN THINK OUTSIDE THE CATEGORIES PROVIDED THEM BY THE JEWS.
THEY USE “MARXIST” AS A TERM OF ABUSE, YET HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA WHAT IT EVEN MEANS.
I AM AS MUCH A MARXIST AS ADOLF HITLER. NO MORE, NO LESS.
WHAT I AM IS A PARTICULARIST…ANTI-UNIVERSALIST.
HBD, “SCIENTIFIC” RACISM, “SICENTIFIC” CLASSISM, IS JUST ANOTHER UNIVERSALISM.
UNIVERSALISM = JUDAISM.
AND “LION” BRINGS UP THE ANTI-HBD JEWS.
WHAT A FUCKING IDIOT…A “USEFUL IDIOT” OF THE JEWS.
you’ve got no idea what “nut” means except the huge black nuts between your legs which drive you to rape white women.
ALMOST THE WHOLE OF AMERICA’S WHITE POPULATION, AND WITH YOU SOME OF ITS BLACK, IS IN THRALL TO MONEY, UNIVERSALISM, AND THE JEWS.
FUCKING GROW UP, YOU FUCKING RETARD.
AND WHY IS THE FAG MISDREAVUS ALSO A JEW-HATER AND A LEFTIST IN ECONOMIC MATTERS?
WE’RE NOT THE SAME PEOPLE!
ALL WE HAVE IN COMMON IS A VERY HIGH IQ.
THE TRUTH IS THE TRUTH PEEPEE…IS THE TRUTH…
IS…
THE…
TRUTH!
St Hitler kept his promise:
http://www.ushmm.org/learn/timeline-of-events/1939-1941/hitler-speech-to-german-parliament
I believe you’re someone of either Asian or South American ancestry who hasn’t lived up to your expectations of wealth or glory. And from all the foreign students I’ve known in college, they experience tremendous pressure to succeed and fit in with white, upper-middle class society at all costs.
So I’m guessing you failed miserably, you had a nervous breakdown, and you work a low-paying IT job somewhere. And you spend all your free time on HBD blogs making long-winded comments about nothing.
You still worship the WASP elite but you can’t handle the idea your failure is due to your genes, even though you think of yourself as smart. You fight back your thoughts of failure by fighting against scientific racism/classism. I also think you attended a university with a large Jewish population…
yet more FALSE CONSCIOUSNESS on display.
fucktard if there ever was one. your dick is bigger than mine? maybe. not to say that mine isn’t huge. but you’re a black guy.
your sister is also your daughter.
there are hardly any jews where i live, let alone at the schools i’ve attended.
yet my quite extensive personal experience with jews has been uniformly negative and confirmatory of the nazi ideology.
a heavily jewish school would never accept me.
jews not only prefer jews, they also prefer DUMB gentiles, especially blacks and latinos.
and “all these HBD blogs” is only this one.
ALL THE OTHERS ERASE MY COMMENTS EVEN IF I’M ABLE TO POST THEM.
EMANCIPATE YOURSELF FROM MENTAL SLAVERY NEGROE!
but then marley’s dad was white! and he died from melanoma, a white man’s disease.
must be genetic!
I guess part of the reason I’m fascinated with jew-hatred is that my experience with Jews has been almost uniformly positive. I can think of plenty of shitty people from other races, but the number of shitty Jews I’ve met has been close to 0.
And trust me, I’ve been around a lot of Jews. Maybe not at their special conspiracy sessions they hold in their undergound lairs, but I’ve been around enough of them. I guess they like me because I make a good token black.
they don’t conspire fucktard!
they don’t need to!
the attribution of “paranoia” and “conspiracy theories” to jew-haters is just another arrow in their quiver…
A LIE!
basically FUCKTARD the “picture of the world” which you take as THE world…
IS A LIE!
you might as well be one of those human batteries in the matrix.
reminds me of this book:
and this from Ghandi:
my dear sir india is british. we’re hardly an alien power.
YEAH! RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT!
PARTICULARISM IS THE TRUTH.
UNIVERSALISM IS A LIE.
There are at least 3 types of antisemites: economic leftists who don’t like the rich (especially investment bankers), foreign policy leftists who don’t like neocons, and white nationalists who don’t like social liberals
Some of the goldbug types tend to be anti-semitic.
conservatism isn’t a philosophy or a system of thought…
it’s a PERVERSION…
like PEDOPHILIA…
but whereas pedophiles molest a few children….
CONSERVATIVES MOLEST THE WHOLE WORLD.
BUT ANGLO-AMERICAN PROLES ARE SO UTTERLY OPPRESSED THAT THEY’VE COME TO IDENTIFY WITH ONE OR ANOTHER OF THE VASSALS OF THEIR JEW KING, THE GOP OR THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF CANADA. IT’S THE STOCKHOLM SYNDROME AT THE LEVEL OF AN ENTIRE CONTINENT.
EXCEPT THAT BECAUSE THESE PARTIES ARE MERE VASSALS, THEIR SUB-VASSALS AND TENANTS CAN STILL BELIEVE THEMSELVES OPPOSED TO THE REIGN OF THEIR JEW KING. THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT VASSAL MEANS.
THIS IS THE TRUTH…
AND IT IS HORRIBLE!
I’M NONE OF THOSE THREE PEEPEE.
Hey Mugabe,
What should my stock portfolio look like?
Do you know anything about Dividend Reinvestment Plans?
fucktard!
your broker reinvests all dividends automatically if it’s a big enough broker, but you might let your dividends accumulate in a money market fund…this is less risky…and gives you more freedom…
the economic future of the developed world from here to 20 years from now is going to look a lot like that of japan after the early 90s to today.
namely, stagnation, stagnation, and more stagnation.
but unlike japan the rest of the developed world also has the problem of inequality and immigration.
australia, nz, and canada will do second best.
scandinavia will do the best.
from the inception of all blackrock’s country funds in the 90s, EWD has done the best, singapore and japan have done the worst.
paradoxically by american prole standards, inequality is very bad and socialism is very good for stocks.
you’ll have to pay me for more advice.
Click to access 13e097.pdf
Click to access HECER_DP364.pdf
Norms of reaction is garbage, different twin studies in different countries show similar results.
Replicated IQ SNPS too: http://ero.sagepub.com/content/1/3/2332858415599972 replicates hits from Rietveld et al 2013
Domingue et al 2015 also replicated them
In fairness, to debunk the reaction norms criticism, you need studies were the identical twins are separated from birth and raised in countries with very different average IQs.
Just having high heritability within a wide range of countries is not enough.
neither of those studies has anything whatever to do with the claim you made.
to date no study has made the comparison you describe. the only paper i’ve seen on this was for only ONE pair of twins. and in that case the twins were claimed to have scored nearly the same IN CHILDHOOD. but this is meaningless to peepee. it’s just a coincidence, because it’s in childhood.
the dalits of japan who moved to america have done just as well as other japanese americans. have they not?
HBDEers AREN’T ONLY RETARDED.
THEY LIE.
LIE. AND LIE.
AND WHEN THEY’RE THROUGH LYING,
THEY LIE SOME MORE.
and of course h^2 is roughly the same from country to country.
churchill,
you’re too fucking retarded to even understand what norms of reaction means.
and of course h^2 is roughly the same from country to country.
churchill,
you’re too fucking retarded to even understand what norms of reaction means.
DEAR FUCKING GOD!
GOTT IN HIMMEL!
JESUS, JOSEPH, AND MARY!
CHURCHILL HAS ABSOLUTELY NO FUCKING CLUE WHAT NORMS OF REACTION MEANS.
YET PEEPEE IS SO RETARDED SHE ASSUMES THAT CHURCHILL’S REPORT IS BOTH PERTINENT AND VERIDICAL.
IT’S NEITHER.
THE GUY HAS OBVIOUSLY CONFUSED NORMS OF REACTION, DIFFERENCES IN h^2 BETWEEN THE DEVELOPED WORLD AS A WHOLE, OR THE WORLD AS A WHOLE AND h^2 WITHIN COUNTRIES,
WITH DIFFERENCES IN h^2 WITHIN COUNTRIES
BETWEEN COUNTRIES.
HE’S CONFUSED THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PARTS AND THE WHOLE WITH
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE WHOLE.
TARDS GONNA TARD.
Every point you’re making here I made in the comment above yours yet I’m retarded for making the exact point you’re making.
Hmmmm
no again peepee you’re just demonstrating how low your iq is.
the mean iq of the countries where the twins were raised is TOTALLY IRRELEVANT.
TOTALLY IRRELEVANT.
ALL OF THE COUNTRIES COULD HAVE THE SAME MEAN IQ.
AND THE RESULT WOULD BE, I EXPECT, A MUCH MUCH LOWER h^2 FOR THESE COUNTRIES AS A WHOLE THAN FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL COUNTRY.
AND I’M HARDLY GAY PEEPEE.
AFTER I FUCKED YOU, YOU’D GIVE UP LESBIANISM.
it’s the “fallacy of composition” among others.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_composition
no again peepee you’re just demonstrating how low your iq is.
Unlike your trailer park U.S. neighborhood, there are no low IQ people where I am. If I have a low IQ I am the only one within a three kilometer radius (excluding hired help & organic retardates).
the mean iq of the countries where the twins were raised is TOTALLY IRRELEVANT.
TOTALLY IRRELEVANT.
It’s totally irrelevant if you think the environmental variables that affect the size of IQs are independent of the environmental variables that affect the rank order of IQs. But you have no way of knowing that.
The whole point of looking at identical twins separated into different countries is that you don’t think separated identical twins within America are raised sufficiently apart to tell us anything interesting. How do we know when identical twins are raised sufficiently apart? One metric might be the average IQ of the countries they live in.
AND I’M HARDLY GAY PEEPEE.
AFTER I FUCKED YOU, YOU’D GIVE UP LESBIANISM.
No, the cure for lesbianism is fucking your mother.
churchill is like a guy who looks at a continent and the land areas of the countries which compose the continent and says,
“all these countries are about the same size.”
and concludes…
“therefore the continent is about the same size as one of its countries.”
Might be of interest to you – I wrote up some further thoughts on Putin’s IQ here:
http://www.unz.com/akarlin/putins-iq-is-130/
Good followup on my Putin article! I have added an update to the very end of my Putin article informing readers who are interested in the topic about your review.
An Englishman enquires: is there supposed to be something distinctive about Charles Murray’s accent? The enunciation and phrasing are evidently practised, as befits a seasoned speaker and broadcaster, and I have always admired his clarity, but from this distance there is no signal to be picked up except a somewhat conservative, professorial air which is no doubt the effect being aimed at.
As an American, I was thinking the same thing. He sound “professorial”, but he doesn’t sound phony or like he’s putting on. He just sounds like a well-practiced speaker.
People with an high SAT score tends to see their real IQ regress to the mean and the same happen for those with a low SAT score.
Videla and Lion of the Judah-sphere are 2 good examples of people with an SAT score which don ‘t match with their real intelligence (i.e. ability to adapt to a wide range of environments).
IQ tests are actually the best known way to estimate someone intelligence relatively to others. And it turns out that Lion of the Judah-sphere scored “only” 120 on probably the most reliable IQ test (i.e. the WAIS IV) which is 21 points lower than his IQ of 141 estimated from his SAT score. Videla, about him, doesn’t show any evidences of the 160 IQ suggested by his SAT score.
Both Lion of the Judah-sphere and Videla appears to be much more cultured than the majority of this blog’s commenters. Even if crystallized intelligence doesn’t change the rank order of the IQ distribution as Pumpkin have explained by using the height analogy in this article : https://pumpkinperson.com/2015/08/31/height-is-a-useful-analogy-for-iq/ . But this only work in a general way, at the individual level there can always be exceptions.
That’s why I think the IQ of Lion of the Judah-sphere could actually be below 120 (on a “perfect IQ test”) because he actually obtained a perfect score on the general knowledge subtest and probably scored relatively high on the other crystallized verbal subtests which put his verbal IQ up to 130. Then, we could think that what inflated his score on the more crystallized SAT relatively to his score on the less crystallized WAIS IV, also inflated his score on the crystallized verbal part of the WAIS IV relatively to his score on the less crystallized performance part of the WAIS IV. We could also think that this element also inflated his score on the more crystallized general knowledge subtest relatively to his scores on the less crystallized other verbal subtests like similarities.
We lack informations about Videla to make the same analysis but the fact that he regularly get owned by Pumpkin when it come to math pretty much indicate that his SAT score might not be a good estimate of his real cognitive abilities.
No offense intended to Lion of the Judah-sphere who is one of the best commenters on this blog, I actually have a lot of respect for him. Intelligence, when it come to scientific debate is not the only thing that matter, honesty and knowledge about the subject are also extremely important.
No offense intended to Lion of the Judah-sphere who is one of the best commenters on this blog, I actually have a lot of respect for him. Intelligence, when it come to scientific debate is not the only thing that matter, honesty and knowledge about the subject are also extremely important.
No offense taken. In fact, I like getting a chance to talk about myself! (I kind of a narcissist, to be frank).
I actually just rechecked my SAT scores, and they were actually only 1480 M+V, not 1520. It shows as 1520 on my college transcript, but that’s because I took the SAT twice and one time I got 800 V, 680 M, the other time 760 V, 720 M, so if you take the highest from each section from either sitting you get 1520.
Mind you, I studied a lot of vocabulary for the verbal section, so I doubt it’s a true reflection of my ability. I also took several practice tests.
I’ve always known I was stronger in crystallized vs. fluid abilities. I did better in verbal subjects growing up. Throughout high school and college, I made straight As in everything language related, but only made Bs in stuff math related. I’ve only taken multivariable calculus/linear algebra as my highest level math.
Outside of class, I was on the Academic Quiz Team from elementary school through college. I’ve been invited to Jeopardy tryouts. I speak German semi-fluently, mostly because I’ve taken it since elementary.
My WAIS IV seems deadly accurate regarding by abilities. I took the Otis-Lennon in kindergarten for gifted testing and scored 120 also. All the online tests I’ve taken (like this one I submitted to Davide Piffer for a study: http://sifter.org/iqtest/) have placed me in the 120-130 IQ range. I have a strong weakness in working memory, particularly digit span, which is strange for blacks, since we tend to perform relatively well in short-term memory tasks. I think it might have something to do with my ADD. Since the WAIS places greater weight on verbal, it may be overstating my full-scale IQ score, but 120 seems like a good reflection of my actual abilities.
People claim that verbal is highly influenced by one’s culture, but I don’t buy it. I went to above average, but not great public schools for all of my education. My home life was average, and by no means intellectual. My parents were college graduates, but neither of them read much beyond the news. My grandparents were all from rural farming backgrounds, so no great cultural influences there. Didn’t grow up in a ghetto but didn’t grow up rich either. Since verbal/cultural tests are so highly g-loaded, I doubt being raised in a certain environment as much impact as some people think.
To be honest, I don’t care if my IQ is 110 or 120 or 130. I think I’ll become rich and successful regardless. Maybe I’ll never win a Nobel Prize, but oh well. I never had to struggle in school, I have a good job, and there’s very little, if anything, challenging in my day-to-day life, so I must be doing something right.
As for Jorge Mugabe Leinster, I don’t think he’s 160 IQ to be honest, but he’s definitely an interesting guy, in an unhinged sort of way. The 150 IQ people I know are all very successful, but I don’t get the impression First Bruno is that successful at all…
My WAIS IV seems deadly accurate regarding by abilities. I took the Otis-Lennon in kindergarten for gifted testing and scored 120 also. All the online tests I’ve taken (like this one I submitted to Davide Piffer for a study: http://sifter.org/iqtest/) have placed me in the 120-130 IQ range. I have a strong weakness in working memory, particularly digit span, which is strange for blacks, since we tend to perform relatively well in short-term memory tasks. I think it might have something to do with my ADD. Since the WAIS places greater weight on verbal, it may be overstating my full-scale IQ score, but 120 seems like a good reflection of my actual abilities.
Childhood IQ tests tends to overstimate high IQs. Online tests are also not very reliable.
You have ADD ? It may explain why you are expressing yourself a lot and in a very honest way on HBD blogs. I kind of appreciate this particularity you have, it make a very genuine and enthusiastic person.
People claim that verbal is highly influenced by one’s culture, but I don’t buy it. I went to above average, but not great public schools for all of my education. My home life was average, and by no means intellectual. My parents were college graduates, but neither of them read much beyond the news. My grandparents were all from rural farming backgrounds, so no great cultural influences there. Didn’t grow up in a ghetto but didn’t grow up rich either. Since verbal/cultural tests are so highly g-loaded, I doubt being raised in a certain environment as much impact as some people think.
It wasn’t really my point. My point was more about your personnality making you seeking more knowledge than the average.
To be honest, I don’t care if my IQ is 110 or 120 or 130. I think I’ll become rich and successful regardless. Maybe I’ll never win a Nobel Prize, but oh well. I never had to struggle in school, I have a good job, and there’s very little, if anything, challenging in my day-to-day life, so I must be doing something right.
Of course, and I wish you the best. My post was more about expressing something I was thinking about for a while.
you don’t know anyone with an IQ above room temperature…including yourself….negroe.
We lack informations about Videla to make the same analysis but the fact that he regularly get owned by Pumpkin when it come to math pretty much indicate that his SAT score might not be a good estimate of his real cognitive abilities.
Exactly
just like you “owned” misdreavus, right?
tards gonna tard.
stupid people don’t know they’re stupid…
and apparently…
can’t.
you have a very low IQ peepee.
The fact that you even think misdreavus had anything but nonsense to say on the subject of statistics, shows how utterly completely mathematically clueless you are.
you’re very talented at being stupid peepee…a prodigy…a savant.
“You would think someone with such a high IQ would want to believe it was genetic,”
Wow. Are you really implying that your opinion of what someone else should want to believe is any guide to the truth?
No. Just pointing out the irony.
Honestly I suspect Videla has a problem with alcohol or something equivalently destructive, and definitely has a mandate against HBD for some reason.
I don’t doubt he has a high IQ, people with low IQ’s don’t casually whip our bivariate analysis to support their points. The fact that he can do this despite the available evidence that he has taken poor care of his mind and failed to honestly extend his knowledge through curioisty, is more credence to the idea that he’s a highly intelligent (If personally troubled) not less.
And, honestly Pump, I do think he’s smarter than you, sorry but I think it’s true. But I think his commitment to honesty, especially where genetics are concerned, and Jewish population statistics concerning wealth are concerned, is more questionable.
I don’t wish ill on either of you and it wasn’t intended as an indictment, I thoroughly enjoy watching the pair of you rip it up and I’m glad you allow him to post!
Incidentally on the Jews, honestly, I find nothing wrong with them in particular. I have a lot of animosity towards Jewish people that are condescending and have enmity towards your WASPs, Scots Irish and Germans because I feel that it’s injust to, well, be bigoted towards a given people simply because as an average yours are more clever or more maligned.
As an anecdote, personally I do not know a Jew smarter than myself, myself having an IQ of 131, and I know a fair few Jews. This may be misleading however, as I believe I’m 1/8th Jewish on my fathers side, but that’s all muddy and quite a sort of family secret type deal if you like so I don’t know how trustworthy the information is.
that he’s highly intelligent (if personally troubled) not less*
I would say pumpkin has an IQ of 135. Videla 125, but with a huge V > P split.
yeah right.
tards gonna tard.
peepee’s IQ is no greater than 60.
I don’t doubt he has a high IQ, people with low IQ’s don’t casually whip our bivariate analysis to support their points.
Any mildly bright high school kid can do bivariate analysis and apply it more appropriately than Videla did.
There are some very good criticisms of Jews & Jewish power that can be made but Videla is hardly bright enough to make them, or even understand them.
Nah, I doubt Pump’s all that much smarter than meself, and honestly I think my verbal is better (Sorry Pump).
I think Videla is what happens to a profoundly intelligent fellow with profound personality problems.
Daniel Tammett, with a full-scale WAIS IQ of 150, and profound mathematical abilities managed only mediocre GCSEs (British equivalent of a high school diploma) largely because of his aspergers. He had an obsession with numbers, but not algebra for example, and so only managed a B on the strength of his absolutely astounding power in that area.
Videla is similarly gifted, and similarly troubled, though from a less intellectual, and more personal angle.
Also, if Bivariate analysis is standard highschool fair in the US I would, unfortunately, be ignorant of this fact, being from the UK.
Even so, I find it curious that despite presumably having had left highschool donkey’s years ago he’s still capable of it, though, as you say, he places it inappropriately. Wouldn’t that suggest a high level of ability in itself? The retention that is.
In any case, I’m basing all of this on his SAT’s, and what I know of his writing. I hesitate to base it on his (Deeply flawed) reason because I have come to deeply distrust the relationship between innate intelligence and reason, especially where highly intelligent, disaffected people are concerned and doubly especially if those people happen to have deep personal problems.
Fare*
Anyway I won’t presume to comment on the intelligence of anybody further than that, I won’t presume to comment on the validity of either a’ youse math as I wouldn’t make head nor tail of it.
My skills have always been in the verbal, much like a Jew really.
It WOULD be pretty cool however if Jorge could produce his SAT results for us, if for nothing else than a rare case study!
I mean think about it, the case study of an anti-semite who refuses to accept the role IQ plays in Jewish success despite having the faculty of mind to know better?
Seems interesting if nothing else.
i’ve already produced my GRE retarded faggot.
and my letter from the BGI.
and the first part of my genome.
your problem is you’re too stupid to understand how stupid you are.
just like peepee…if you aren’t peepee.
If so feel welcome to link me to the post, I am new to the blogroll so I will not have seen your GRE, or letter from the BGI.
I am unconcerned with your genome.
“your problem is you’re too stupid to understand how stupid you are” You’re using an inductive argument, that is to say, based on what you believe to know about me you make the case for understanding my problem; due to the problem of induction however you cannot logically make the case that your conclusion is certain, or even reasonable.
I find it hilarious you’d confuse me for Pump, we write entirely differently.
you couldn’t be new and have read so many of my comments that you could make your retarded judgements.
you’re too stupid even to be capable of understanding how stupid you are.
peepee.
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=28s67ih&s=8#.VjAk0bM2tyQ
You don’t really need to read the blog all that much to get the gist of the things you say, Jorge.
Also that GRE is post 1995, by the looks of it, so not worth as much as your pre-1995 scale SAT.
yet more lies.
the gre hadn’t changed for decades when i sat it fucktard.
sat changes in ’95, gre doesn’t change until idk.
and i made the high score in north america on the SoA’s old exam 100., and passed all of its math exams on the first try.
a 770 GMAT.
and my bachelors is in math.
etc.
you’re a moron.
show me your scores and then you might have something to say.
until then…
“the gre hadn’t changed for decades when i sat it fucktard”
Except for the addition of an entirely new section, the analytic. But as you like.
“you might have something to say.”
Well, as a matter of fact I did have something to say, present your scores, and you presented your GRE. So I got what I wanted, more or less.
I find it bizarre that you’ve made the whole affair into one giant implication that I’m trying to denigrate you in any way or imply that you’re intellectually inadequate.
Based on what you’ve shown me academically you’re evidently very clever.
But that doesn’t make you any more successful in your as yet futile endevour to argue with Pump over the internet over nothing. It apparently hasn’t even made you happier, you seem quite agitated about the whole thing to be honest.
Camus said that we must imagine Sisyphus happy, but you don’t seem all that happy.
Couldn’t you do something far more interesting with your wealth of talent? If you started a blog on something fascinating I’d probably follow it, I’m sure you can being evidently very clever.
Anyway I’m not here in particular to denigrate or insult you, despite what you might think. More than anything else I just wanted to know your scores out of curiosity.
Thanks for producing your GRE!
I would still like to see your SAT if you could produce it for me.
As I said I’m not going to denigrate you or judge you, I’m not in the business of having arguments on the internet.
I’m just curious about intelligence, and your scores are high enough to just warrant attention, the fact that we have here an example of a high scorer is a valuable resource, and a source of curiosity to me.
Camus was a tedious prole.
but that first like of the stranger is up there with the first to scaramouche.
read Being and Time…
understand it…
and fuck off…
and leave Shit-ain if you can. its only competitor for shittiest developed country is the US.
but likely thatcher’s salty corpse like clit is your pacifier and will be until you join her in hell.
the english speaking peoples are to the world what the confederacy is to the US…prole morons who ruin everything for everyone yet think themselves “posh” and sophisticated rather than despicable and sophistical.
even your short scrawny proles can’t get far in the world cup.
talent?
i can’t play snooker like ronnie o’.
the City, your whole economy, should be renamed…
the Shitty.
“Being and Time”
You actually take Heidegger seriously?
Now THAT’S prole.
Phenomenology? Post-Kantian nonsense?
Jesus Christ that stuff is so utterly disconnected from reality that it’s insane. It doesn’t even meet with logic.
I mean if you’re gonna be abusive all day at least have the brains not to reveal the fact that you’re a prole, delusional phenomenologist!
Oh shit I am laughing my arse off a real live phenomenologist!
How hard do you hit the drugs man.
I mean I wasn’t going to say anything but HEIDEGGER, now I can’t HELP but take the piss.
Now I see the extent of your delusion and it’s more funny than sad.
Take it away Pump, you’re better at handling this guy than me.
I mean obviously from one demi-elite WASP to the other, and as a guy who thinks environment has a massive impact on how you grow as a person I’m sympathetic to your points but.
Heidegger? Really? You prefer Heideggers erroneous take on ontology the Camus?
I mean, I’m not going to tell you that Camus was super-philosopher, but he had the good sense to stay in his lane and merely comment on how best to live our lives.
Jorge, I like you, I really do. I don’t think you’re evil like Pump does, but quit abusing me if you wanna discuss with me.
And I don’t like football, I like Rugby, where we’re all but scrawny and still one of the best-ranked teams in the world.
It’s hard to know how smart he is. I don’t really trust tests like the SAT/GRE to reliably discriminate above IQ 135 in non-children. I’m much more impressed with someone who scores 1400 on the SAT at age 14 than someone who scores 1600 at 17 because the former has achieved a rare score without exceeding the test’s alleged functional ceiling.
The best sense of a person’s IQ comes not from how much they know or how well they write, but from the quality of their thoughts.. Chartreuse has had some very good thoughts, for example the difference between independent genetic effects and dependent genetic effects…an idea that never entered my mind or was talked about Jensen.
But he has some cognitive limitation that prevents him from taking it to the next level. For example, he does not appear to understand why a low global heritability does not necessarily invalidate HBD, nor does he appear to understand what conditions are necessarily for it to do so..
peepee is lying again.
and claiming i’ve said or implied things i haven’t.
but peepee has a low IQ.
and impersonates a > 100 IQ poorly peepee.
peepee is stuck in her own small evil lying cranium.
i’m not an abstraction peepee.
your autism prevents you from understanding this.
you dumb.
me smart.
once you’re smart enough to know how dumb you are tell me.
but you’ll have to try really hard for at least a 10 years.
peepee is lying again.
and claiming i’ve said or implied things i haven’t.
Do you understand why a global heritability below 0.5 does not debunk the 0.8 heritability within the U.S as an independent genetic effect?
i’m not an abstraction peepee.
I know you’re not an abstraction. That’s the problem. You can’t think abstractly.
of course i do peepee-tard…as if it were some great aha…rather than a BORING scholium…but apparently one quite subtle for the tres un-subtle peepee-tard…
PEEPEE’S IQ <= 60.
as i’ve said before…the difference isn’t climate or diet…as it would be for some population of wild animals…the difference is SOCIAL…
man is the social animal par excellence…and he grows to the height of a queensland eucalyptus or withers as a sapling in the great karoo…depending on the environs which are his society…
speaking of environs…
A way a lone a last a loved a long the
PARIS,
1922-1939.
riverrun, past Eve and Adam’s, from swerve of shore to bend
of bay, brings us by a commodius vicus of recirculation back to
Howth Castle and Environs.
peepee’s case is so sad.
she desperately wants to be smart, but can’t be.
and not because she was kicked in the head by a horse or has “bad genes”, but…
because she’s evil.
and thus her stupidity is also a condemnation.
she hates it.
so would i.
stat crux dum volvitur orbis…
motherfucker.
The question went COMPLETELY over your head, and you completely missed the point. You’re a moron.
yet another example of videla’s lemma…
stupid people think they’re smarter than those who are smarter than they…even those who are A LOT smarter…
were all of your grandparents even english speaking?
no!
peepee confuses here own stupidity for that of the stupidity of her betters intellectual, moral, and social.
until she gives up being evil…
she’ll never be smart.
you should’ve corrected me peepee.
is should’ve said……victorian eucalyptus.
a tasmanian pretender…i pretend…