CNN has a fascinating article about how tensions are mounting between President Obama and America’s organized Jewish community, over the Iran nuclear deal. HBD predicts the deal will fall through, because as brilliant as President Obama is, HBD says that not even the brightest members of the black elite will be any match for the Jewish elite, who are said to possess rare high IQ genes associated with Gaucher’s disease and Tay-Sachs.
So if intelligence is the cognitive ability to adapt: to take whatever situation you’re in, and turn it around to you advantage, the higher IQ side should come out on top. And even though most American Jews, at least most high IQ American Jews, probably support Obama on this issue, their support seems only lukewarm, while the high IQ Jews who oppose the deal, are absolutely passionate, which is exactly what EGI would predict.
CNN specifically cites AIPAC’s “$20 million-plus effort against the agreement, including TV ads, emails and visits to congressional offices”.
President Obama is using his extremely high verbal IQ to fight back, telling an interviewer:
The lobbying that is taking place on the other side is fierce, it is well-financed, it is relentless. And in the absence of your voices, you are going to see the same array of forces that got us into the Iraq War, leading to a situation in which we forgo a historic opportunity and we are back on the path of potential military conflict.
However the organized Jewish community has cleverly taken this argument away from Obama, accusing him of fueling stereotypes about Jews being well-financed warmongers who value Israel over America. However they are smart enough to know that directly attacking a historic president like Obama could backfire, so they emphasize the fact that Obama’s comments are not intentionally harmful, but they are harmful nonetheless.
By attacking the deal from both an offensive and defensive position simultaneously, the organized Jewish community is using their high IQ to adapt the situation to their advantage, and public support for the deal is plummeting, and President Obama can not even fight back without being accused of fueling ethnic stereotypes. Can Obama adapt to this incredibly challenging and nuanced situation? Only time will tell.
Good to see that HBD predicts good news for Israel. God I love that country.
Lol
Real Americans stand with Israel 1000%. Treasonous scum like you need to get the fuck out of America. I hope you get deported you antisemetic cunt. Get the fuck out of my country.
.
Santoculto you dont appear autistic AT ALL, I think you said you were a little bit autistic to Afrosapiens to not look stupid because you didnr understood his “joke”.
Btw, I agree with your “LOL” which the only descent answer you can offer to this kind of monkey.
Santoculto, what’s your profession and academic background ?
So you want that USA attacks Iran for Israel?
Actually, it’s quite fascinating in the sense, that the majority of the Jews support the Iran deal, where much the White Gentile population in America are against it. Pumpkin is making this post as to con-volute further of a convoluted problem. A waste of time in speculating and typing.
Of course, America supports Israel. It’s another ugly country with talent-less people, who think they are better than everyone else.
Obama could be a bit tad cocky to those Jewish groups who are against it, by saying “you guys don’t speak for the majority of Jewish Americans, because most of them agree with me”.
The Jews who don’t care about this issue agree with Obama. The new York Jews who care and give money agree with Israel. That’s why there’s a massive lobbying against the deal and very little lobbying for it. It’s the most motivated side that dominates.
Dominate what? The Republicans are against the deal. They are currently the underdogs/losers who cry wolf all the time, in our political circus.
Most Americans support Israel because the media loves Israel and most Americans are influenced by the media.
The media doesn’t love Israel, it’s just the stupidity of Americans who are a confused bunch, by calling a lesser of 2 evils, their friends.
You’ve obviously never worked in media. you criticize Israel and youre done. The media adores Israel especially the New York media.
The NY Times is known for its anti-Israel bias!
Jew York Time have a overwhelming liberal audience. They criticize ”littlely” and ”sweetly” israel just to say ”cosi cosi” what their readers want heard.
“Jew York Time” ROFL, a “little bit autistic” guy cant make this kind of extremely funny pun(you arent even talking in your first language!).
Weird people talk to me!!! 🙂
My first language ‘was’ tupi-guarani, simplified maccawrongnick aenglische is the high functioning speranto, the language of the future, the sweet vendetta against idisch-yankeean imperialism.
Santoculto did not invent the Jew York Time thing and he’s a native portuguese speaker mulatto, not an Amerindian-Brazilian. He’s from the State of Minas Gerais and his IP adress indicates that he lives somewhere in or near Belo Horizonte where he seems to have been born and raised. This area of Brazil has almost no traditional native communities. The queen of Brazil is just a lying bitch.
He’s not autistic either, just plain dumb and appearently socially worthless. At least we’re lucky he’s a faggot so he won’t have offsprings.
Lol, he is probably a worthless piece of shit who bring nothing to society and a faggot who love black cock but he is right on the fact that blacks are in average less intelligent that white. Of course you dont have to be particularly intelligent to figure out thar thats why the average US racialist IQ is only 93 according to the owner of this blog.
Yes he’s right saying that, but his wrong saying it’s genetic and unchangeable. And actually, it’s only right if we take IQ intelligence in consideration. But if intelligence is thought as one’s ability to adapt to a specific situation in the best way, there is no better measurement of that than personal satisfaction with life.
How do you know his IP address?
As an author on Lindsay’s blog, he could probably see IPs of those who commented there
That’s what I figured.
Yes, checking location is useful to understand an individual. I know where all regular lindsay commenters are from and for Americans, the more you go south, the more they get dumb and the most psychotic was from Southern Alabama.
So why do you asked me where I come from in France ? To force me to say it on the internet in front of the hundreds of readers of this blog ?
You did not comment when I was an author.
It’s no big deal if people know in which region you’re from. Lindsay’s from California, one of his commenter is from Tennessee, I’m from Nantes, Pays-de-la-Loire/Brittany depending on wether you prefer administrative or cultural regions.
If you got intersted in HBD I guess you’re either from the most racist region Provence-Alpes-Côte-d’Azur or somewhere else in the south-east or you are from Paris, the most diverse.
LOL.
Ça fait plaisir de voir un nantais défendre la voix de la raison sur des sites web racialistes americains ! J’ai decouvert ce site en cherchant des infos sur la génétique des populations pour un travail a luniv et je suis tombé sur l’article ou le guignol qui tient ce blog affirme que les asiatiques sont la race supérieur ! En tout cas j’admire ta patience face à tant de stupidité, moi si je commencais à argumenter avec ces attardés je peterais un cable tout de suite 😀
Sinon j’ai cru comprendre que tu étais avocat, t’as un cabinet sur Nantes ?
Si tu ne veux pas trop donner d’infos perso sur ce site malsain on peux communiquer par mail, mon adresse est marlostanfield37000@gmail.com (je suis un fan de the wire).
Salut Pierre, merci pour le soutien. Oui ici on lit des choses consternantes et je pense qu’il est important que les lecteurs puissent lire des arguments contradictoires et plus sensés quand bien même convaincre les habitués est peine perdue.
Je garde ton adresse mais j’aimerais garder un certain anonymat parce que je ne suis pas forcément très fière de traîner sur des sites pareils…
HBD predicts the deal will fall through, because as brilliant as President Obama is, HBD says that not even the brightest members of the black elite will be any match for the Jewish elite, who are said to possess rare high IQ genes associated with Gaucher’s disease and Tay-Sachs.
You speak for all of HBD? Of course HBD predicts that the smartest Jews are smarter than the smartest blacks, but I’m not sure if that means HBD says, “the Iran nuclear deal will fall through.”
Our very own judahsphere forgot to think in an abstract way, may be he will, one day.
Robert Lindsay banned me.
Eat shit
Oh my God, what happened?
Lol, he’s gonna ban everyone untlil there are only santoculto-like morons left.
What is the planet (of apes) you live zapiens***
I know, it’s called ”my shining black head”.
Houston, we have a (pattern) problem….
even the ”smart blacks” here, tend to have super-ego and worldwide famous lack of civilized habits even in trivial conversations…
I no have guilty that you have a greater racial inferiority complex. You see ”racism” everywhere because everyone know that you resemble a monkey, including you.
Your greater vocabulary is nothing, near to absolute zero without good and RIGHT ideas in your vibrant head, ape!
Just other ”smart types” with wrong ideas, in other words, no intuition, no creativity (zero original hypothesis, theories or speculations, just irrational arrogance and mono-ronic arguments), no precision, just a obscure verbose ”study” made by jewish ideologues and zionistically correct.
get a password to get in line of the smart world son, jesuiiiis!!!!
And yep, i’m a faggot, pervert, i don’t care, i no have any shame to be myself, but i at least i can pretend something that ordinary people dislike… and you***
Decrease your pride to be a super rare (relative) smart black.
A tip from someone who is very wise, much more than you can imagine, after all, even after so many shocks (ie, cheap name-calling), you still can not join the two winning neurons in your head, to realize that.
You know, I’m a pretty handsome dude, nice built, cute face, not so dark brown skin, ladies like me and I bet you would be no exception. You hate that I’m exactly the kind of guy you’d like to be fucked by.
”You know, I’m a pretty handsome dude, nice built, cute face, not so dark brown skin, ladies like me and I bet you would be no exception. You hate that I’m exactly the kind of guy you’d like to be fucked by.”
Lol, you live a world fantasy.
I don’t care what zumbified white women like or dislike.
Women tend to like idiotic men like you, because the woman like man that looks like a child, a children’s mentality, like yours, I do not doubt.It is a maternal instinct.
His parents have taken you out of pity, you know that ** Oh, and do not go ask them if they think you look like a monkey because they will lie for you.
This is called objective truth, a stone is a stone, a half-ape is a half-ape.
I do not like bestiality!!
Women, contrary to gay males don’t have peadophilic tastes, they like men who are manly in their looks and behavior, being a substitute mom is what an heterosexual woman hates the most.
Women like smart guys who carry their balls, guys who care for them, provide for them and make them feel proud and beautiful. Many women see that kind of guy in me and the fact that I look better than average is quite secondary.
But you can’t understand, fags will be fags…
If women, especially white zumbified, liked intelligent men, we would not have intelligent men suffering persecution systematically in schools, not many geniuses (I do not know if you know, ape) who ends up alone.
Tesla ****
You’re a dirty joke, like the color of your skin.
Go back to the jungle, because its veneer of ” l’uomo civilizattto ” is no longer convincing many here,.
Women need men who can love them in a sincere way, but that may be filed, because the rule tells me that women need someone who is smarter than her, which is not the case, not worth acting , ape, you need to be and be smart, it’s something you’re not.
I’m trying to understand where your primitive little head took that homosexuals want to marry women if they wanted to, they would not be gay.
I know real people, because I am a real person, you are a genetic error that was saved by two stupid people who can not make logical associations.
I repeat that it is the first time that I see you walking contradiction as a ” social scientist ” which has neg(r)ative bias against homosexuals.
How does the ” French citizen ” should act towards their fellow gays in the social science, licee ** **
Already should have some 200,000 Chinese immigrants living in France, now let’s imagine what are the chances of at least 200 of these immigrants act wildly as the ” French citizens” up there in the video.
“I’m trying to understand where your primitive little head took that homosexuals want to marry women if they wanted to, they would not be gay.”
Well you can try to understand something that I didn’t say as long as you please.
Didn’t wanna stoop so low but…
Santoculto, please shut the fuck up. Because of you people will think that HBDers are stupid, racists and ultra emotive beings who cant control their pulsions.
Afrosapiens is smart but he is a lier. He is a lawyer.
“Because of you people will think that HBDers are stupid, racists and ultra emotive beings who cant control their pulsions.”
No don’t worry for this, it is obvious to every reader that HBD is the product of balanced, open-minded, cultured, smart, sane and objective people and that santoculto is just the best among them.
I have to admit, I chuckled at Afrosapiens’ video. But don’t the Italianos have swag, also?
This is a humoristic commercial, don’t even try to make serious extrapolations about it. Here it just appeals to the common exotic feel that black give to Europeans, but I can imagine a similar video in a Nigerian slum where a woman turns her black husband into a white man who will take her away from hell.
Italiano = singular masculine
Italiani = plural masculine
Italianos is Iberian, Italiens is French.
I know you don’t like wikipedia but it has more encyclopedic authority than HBD chick. Here is what it says about racism and racialism.
“the ties between the historical evolution of racialism and racism are examined by Kwame Anthony Appiah in his book In My Father’s House:
Racialism is not, in itself, a doctrine that must be dangerous, even if the racial essence is thought to entail moral and intellectual dispositions. Provided positive moral qualities are distributed across the races, each can be respected, can have its “separate but equal” place.[1]
W. E. B. Du Bois, 1918
In 1903, W. E. B. Du Bois claimed that racialism was the philosophical position that “races” existed and collective differences existed between such categories. He theorized further in 1903 that racism required advancing the argument that one “race” is superior to other “races.” Kwame Anthony Appiah summarized Du Bois’ position in his 1992 book In my father’s house. According to Appiah’s interpretation of DuBois’ theory, racialism is value neutral and racism is value charged.
Today, some psychologists point to studies that suggest racialist beliefs result from dismissal of modern population genetics.[2][3][4][5][6][7][8]
According to the Oxford English Dictionary, racialism is synonymous with racism.[9]”
Don’t you wish to comment on the following part of my answer to Lynn’s study ?
Hahahaha, Robert’s clearly an emotionally fragile narcissist. He may also be an sexually deviant psychopath based on his post today about dating young girls. He probably thinks Jared Fogle is an OK guy.
I’m guessing Mr. Lindsay spends all day online reading about himself and found the comment I made on this blog knocking him. THat lead to him banning me.
Robert Lindsay is clearly a smart guy, but he runs his blog like he’s a thin-skinned child. I poke a little fun at Pumpkin Person and he takes it in stride because he’s clearly a notorious genius with a world-renowned expertise in intelligence research. But Robert is unsure of himself, yet has huge ambitions, so he feels the need to ban anyone who insults him, even indirectly.
And clearly Santoculto and Afrosapiens should just fukk each other and get it over with.
clearly
Lindsay has obvious mental issues, just look how he promoted me to author status just one week after I started commenting there. If he had minimal respect for what he does, he wouldn’t let a stranger use his “masterpiece” for his own motivations so easily.
You say Lindsay is smart but he’s not, first there is his complete lack of knowledge in almost every topic he touches. In addition to that, his sense of logic and understanding of nuances is very limited. On top of all of this is his hyper-inflated ego that ends to make him irrational, emotive (takes everithing personally) and dictatorial.
I think his blog has a therapeutical role in his life, since he’s a total failure in the real world, he has his little cyber-world where he feels king… Beggar king since he often asks contributions to commenters and I’ve spent 20$ on that bitch, just because I have sympathy for him.
Hahaa, you gave that guy $20? I don’t think I would never give anyone on the Internet money, even someone well-respected or established like Steve Sailer.
The rest of your comment makes sense.
I did it to humiliate him. Now he insults me, pretends I’m a member of an inferior race, but 20$ probably means a lot given his situation while in mine, it means nothing. I would even give the same to santoculto if he posts a pic of his pussy.
Off topic: I posted a link to a Lynn’s study in previous comment. I’m quite disappointed because it was a paper he made in 2013 when he claimed he had found the genetic infrastructure behind race differences in IQ. It would be really exciting to discuss it with Swank, you, Pumpkin and a few other balanced commenters.
The study however was not produced in an academic setting and only appeared in Mankind Quaterly (Scientific racism’s official publication). The cause of this is clear, Lynn as usual does not respect many of the basic scientific work requirements and the whole paper is BS. But it’s close enough to the hypotheses we see in HBD blogs to have a heated debate.
Check it, tell me what you think of it. It’s from 2013.
http://blog.intelligence-humaine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/First.pdf
” I don’t think I would never give anyone on the Internet money, even someone well-respected or established like Steve Sailer.”
African Americans don’t tip 🙂
The study however was not produced in an academic setting and only appeared in Mankind Quaterly (Scientific racism’s official publication).
If Mankind Quarterly is scientific racism, does that make all scientists who disagree with HBD scientific anti-racists?
Check it, tell me what you think of it. It’s from 2013.
http://blog.intelligence-humaine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/First.pdf
It’s not surprising that a study found genes correlated with IQ; the real challenge is 1) replicating the finding, and 2) proving the correlation is causal. The latter challenge exists for many traits, but the burden of proof is higher for IQ because it’s politically incorrect.
You mean that afrosmaiens should put his dick in santocultos ass.
Yes.
“If Mankind Quarterly is scientific racism, does that make all scientists who disagree with HBD scientific anti-racists?”
No, many people are extremely racist/prejudiced but are still smart enough to understand HBD is unscientific. I don’t really think your question is relevant. But the fact that Mankind Quarterly is a racist publication is a secret for nobody.
“It’s not surprising that a study found genes correlated with IQ; the real challenge is 1) replicating the finding, and 2) proving the correlation is causal. The latter challenge exists for many traits, but the burden of proof is higher for IQ because it’s politically incorrect.”
The sample in which some genetic variants were fractionally found to correlate with IQ is probably the best that has ever been taken. 126 000 unrelated individuals, all caucasians. Realize, 126 000 is a middle size city at European scale, it is almost impossible to perform a more comprehensive GWAS. Yet only 10 genetic variants were found and only 3 could be replicated, each giving a +0.3 gain in IQ which gives a +1.8 for someone homozygotic with the 3 variants.
However, making worldwide racial evolutive extrapolations about these findings is not scientifc whatsoever because the sample was exclusively Caucasian in order to avoid population stratification. It means that due to greater proximity with Asians than Africans, allele frequencies are more similar between Eurasians populations and that Africans are always outliers.
Then, the fact that 126 000 individuals they could only replicate 3 alleles giving a +0.3 IQ boost proves that the higher frequencies are the result of a founder effect mor than natuaral selection since both the allele frequencies (35.1-39.1) and the IQ advantages appear to be low, in addition, these alleles seem to originate from Africa and were appearantly not linked to adaptation to Eurasian environments. Moreover, each allele taken separetely does not follow the HBD racial hierarchy and sometimes two populations of different races have more similar frequencies on some alleles than two populations of the same race.
Lynn claims that intelligence is as polygenic as height and thousands of common variants are involved in group differences, yet in a sample of 126 000 individuals, only 3 of them could be replicated. So if intelligence is polygenic, it most likely involves uncommon variants that do not allow much genetically based population differences.
And if IQ is really like height, this is bad news for Lynn because a study found that African Americans had 12 genetic variants involved in height and that only 5 of them were shared with caucasians. If IQ is really like height, we must predict that Africans have 7.2 replicated genetic IQ boosters while Caucasians have only 3. More importantly, the luckiest of the Africans may have a +4.32 IQ points genetic advantage while non-african are only left with +1.8. Lynn shouldn’t have forgotten that Africa is the place where most of human genetic diversity happens and that a Caucasian sample, no matter how big is far from being representative of humanity’s gene pool.
For all of these reasons, his paper could not make it in scientific journals and I even think Lynn has been made aware that his hypothese was kind of risky and could result in finding a genetic advantage for Africans.
No, many people are extremely racist/prejudiced but are still smart enough to understand HBD is unscientific.
Stephen Pinker is an HBDer who teaches at Harvard university. You’re telling me that you’re smarter than he is?
But the fact that Mankind Quarterly is a racist publication is a secret for nobody.
Define “racist”.
Racist: someone who believes that human races are a valid biologic concept and that a natural hierarchy exists between them.
Racist: someone who believes that human races are a valid biologic concept and that a natural hierarchy exists between them.
You’re defining a racialist, not a racist. HBDers and racists are both racialists, and some HBDers are racist, but there’s nothing intrinsically racist about HBD, as HBD chick explained:
https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2014/08/21/hbd-and-racism/
Sorry, I posted my answer on the wrong comment;
I know you don’t like wikipedia but it has more encyclopedic authority than HBD chick. Here is what it says about racism and racialism.
“the ties between the historical evolution of racialism and racism are examined by Kwame Anthony Appiah in his book In My Father’s House:
Racialism is not, in itself, a doctrine that must be dangerous, even if the racial essence is thought to entail moral and intellectual dispositions. Provided positive moral qualities are distributed across the races, each can be respected, can have its “separate but equal” place.[1]
W. E. B. Du Bois, 1918
In 1903, W. E. B. Du Bois claimed that racialism was the philosophical position that “races” existed and collective differences existed between such categories. He theorized further in 1903 that racism required advancing the argument that one “race” is superior to other “races.” Kwame Anthony Appiah summarized Du Bois’ position in his 1992 book In my father’s house. According to Appiah’s interpretation of DuBois’ theory, racialism is value neutral and racism is value charged.
Today, some psychologists point to studies that suggest racialist beliefs result from dismissal of modern population genetics.[2][3][4][5][6][7][8]
According to the Oxford English Dictionary, racialism is synonymous with racism.[9]”
Don’t you wish to comment on the following part of my answer to Lynn’s study ?
Definition of racism:
Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one’s own race is superior.
There is nothing racist with this blog according to this definition, why are you trying to play on the reader self estime while we are talking about science Afrosapiens ?
When HBD and astrology finally meet…
Irrelevant as ever.
Hey Enrique, you’re very entertaining, you’re kind of a troll and your only goal here seems to be to attack people but we all get our share of it and that’s funny, thank you.
You are a one who entertains here. We hbd’dears always heard of black magic, but until then, had never come across in a black fake intellectual like you, in ” first person ”.
How many times will I have to ask you what is your occupation and academic background ? I know you don’t work for the FBI so what you do in life shouldn’t be so secret.
I’m not willing to tell you. Spend their defective neurons to think of it, if you like.
If you had a diploma and training that could make you as proud as mine makes me, you would be enchanted to tell it. It just happen that you’re socially worthless. You can’t found a family, can’t have an outstanding occupation or college diploma. You’re just no better than the different people you critisize and you make no more difference for anyone in this world than a ape.
No son or future son to call you daddy, no woman to call you her other half or at least sex-mate, no boss to appreciate your contribution to his business, no customers to appreciate your services, no employees to thank you for giving them an opportunity, no teachers to acknowledge your intellectual efficiency, no friends to recognize your valuable personality. As useless as an ape.
You are both clown.
You’re right, on this post at least. I’m just having a boring day, my girlfriend’s away for a couple of days and the weather is ugly today in my city. So I have fun picking on the queen of Brazil, It’s silly but entertaining.
Another thing that your pseudo-smart brain is not able to perceive, to think on their own. The academic occupation of a person does not mean that one is better or worse, and many hbd’ers here know that many with doctorates are far from deserving its title.
I will repeat, I do not want to talk to you. I do not have to give satisfaction of my life to you, if you want to talk civilly, reduce their disproportionate ego. If not, you will be speaking with your own hand.
If you had a diploma and training that could make you as proud as mine makes me, you would be enchanted to tell it.
You have a diploma and training? What a waste of an education. You clearly lack the natural ability for higher thought.
Sure
LOL…Afrosapiens and Santoculto are like children. Please SHUT THE FUCK UP
Why did Lindsay ban you ? I think swank has also come under ban threat lately ? Lindsay is currently in a stalinian purge phase.
Thats fucking ridiculous its like the changing of the blog theme has no effect.
Does Lindsay’s blog have a theme except the delusions of a Californian crook ?
It’s just crazy and disgusting how he’s giving advice for men who want to have sex with underage girls. That should be reported to authorities.
He’s lucky he’s not in France because as a lawyer, I know exactly how to get him into legal trouble based on that.
And after that he writes about inferior and psychopathic races… smh.
Americans have dumped literally trillions of dollars into defending Israel.
It cannot be undone. Fine..
But in exchange Americans should be given Israeli citizenship.
There is no downside to Israelis. In fact, most Americans would probably be willing to allow the Israelis to conquer the entire Orient.
The alternative is that people are increasingly seeing our relationship as benefiting Americans Jews, Israelis and nobody else. There’s a word for that: parasitism. It will not end well.
It’s amazing how credulous/dumb, many Americans have become, when it comes to the superiority of Israel. So many White Christians call Israel, the only democracy in the middle east, where it is also a paradise, an utopia, and a jewel surrounded by barbarism, at all sides. According to testaments from very objective American Jews who visited Israel, they tell me that Israel is an ugly country with poor aesthetics, which is not surprising, given the low visual spatial IQ of Jews.
One must understand, if it wasn’t for Euro Antisemitism, which culminated into Hitler’s campaign to eliminate Jews systematically, there will be no Israel today. Euro Christians never liked Jews throughout the ages, and suddenly, now White Americans want to see Jews as their friends, because of a powerful force lurking, which want to assert its own hegemonic global influence, that of which, is Islam.
Jews have a spatial IQ of 98, it is only lower than northern Europeans and East Asian. Of course this is only Ashkenazi Jews and they are 55% of israelis Jews which are 75% of Israels population.
When you talk about the spatial IQs of Jews, you have to distinguish between measures of pure spatial ability and measures of general reasoning that just happen to use the spatial medium.
You also have to distinguish between American Ashkenazim & Israeli Ashkenazim. The best and brightest Ashkenazim tend to live in America.
My dream if I was a dictator at the worldwide scale:
I would maximize the differences between the major races with some kind of eugenism. I would first sterilized all the intermediate races like middle easterners, latinos, indians etc and also the bushmen, australoids, native americans. I would ONLY keep NORTHERN EUROPEANS, WESTERN SSA AFRICANS, EAST ASIANS (without mongols and japanese).
I would breed them by selected the traits with which they are associated:
– I would select BLACKS for testosterone, genital size, lower intelligence (but which is still fonctionning), bigger jaws, bigger lips and nostrils, stronger skeleton, darker skin, higher psychopathy. They would be so selected in that way that almost all the individuals would be ultra muscular with huge jaws and small brain, they would be ultra violent and would fuck all the time.
– I would select NORDICS for beauty which the traits we associet more with them, I would keep them at their actual level of intelligence. All the individuals of this new race would have a perfect facial and body symetry and they would all be more attractive than tbe most attractive actual human being.
– I would select ORIENTALS for intelligence and low testosterone and psychopathy. They would all look like kids with no pilosity and kids voice and an average penis size of 2 cm in erection. They would not muscular at all and would have an average IQ of 300. They would have extremely small jaws and teeth.
I would use NORDIC females for my sexual pleasure, I would make BLACKS male fight to death in a cage and I would use the extremely domesticated ORIENTALS to make innovations and keep me alive and keep all this society in place.
Yes, I imagined a similar thought experiment. Would you also breed for racial differences in height? If so, in what direction?
I would not select height in this particular experiment.
If I would select height, I would do so in an experiment in which I divide humanity into 2 races: the PRIMITIVE RACE and the PROGRESSIVE RACE.
– THE PRIMITIVE RACE: I would select all the primitive traits which exist in all the agriculturists homo sapiens populations. This PRIMITIVE RACE would look like an exaggerated BLACK RACE. With exceptions: I would select this race for small height and other trait that I havent in mind in this moment.
– THE EVOLVED RACE: I would select all the progressive traits which exist in all the agriculturists homo sapiens populations. THIS EVOLVED RACE would look like a mix between NORDICS and ORIENTALS. Orientals for all the progressive traits link to higher INTELLIGENCE and lower AGGRESSIVITY. Nordics for the height and the very light features which are progressives.
An individual of the EVOLVED RACE could be put at the right of this image, after the homo sapiens sapiens.
http://www.hominides.com/html/theories/evolution-de-l-homme-representation-dessin.php
Afrosapians, who created that map? Are they credible? Also, international comparisons are suspect because people in rich countries are more likely to obese which increases cup size.
I believe there is a trend of East Asians and blacks breeding, both in Africa and there is also a few blacks in China. Are Oriental mulattoes smarter than White mulattoes?
You have to understand this type of breeding would be dysgenic. Undesirables from China are breeding with blacks. Perhaps 2 negatives make a positive.
An ex African president is part Chinese:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Ping
And your Jayman Worship, he’s got both black and asiatic!
Whoa, is that Jayman’s father?
I think Blacks and Asians are morphologically closer to each other than with Europeans because Blasians look like less hybridized blacks than Mulattos.
Blasians:
Mulattos:
http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/default/files/styles/image_content_width/hash/c6/25/President_Official_Portrait_HiRes_5.jpg?itok=2niCjtFP
In any case, black features tend to dominate, if I wanted to do reverse HBD, I would have an hypothesis like black features are more evolutive and beneficial so they take over Eurasian ones.
If was a dictator at the scale of a big white country I would:
I would sterilize ALL THE ETHNIC MINORITIES to end up with a 100% WHITE POPULATION and I would divided the population in 2 entity: the POOREST 50% and the RICHEST 50%.
I would select the POOREST 50% for all the primitive traits:
– Bigger GENITALS
– High testosterone
– Bigger TITS for females
– Bigger ASSES for females
– Higher pilosity
– Smaller HEIGHT
– Bigger Muscles
– Lower IQ
– Bigger jaws
– I would not select darker skins to not make a black/white distinction which I can already see in the actual world which is pretty boring. May be given the direct relationshim between skin color and aggressivity , darker skin would be selected as a byproduct of higher testosterone.
And I would end up with small violent muscular hypersexual creatures.
I would select the RICHEST 50% for all the advanced traits:
– smaller GENITALS and smaller SEXUAL traits (tits asses etc)
– less pilosity
– higher HEIGHT
– less MUSCLES
– ETC
And I would end up with a big brained high IQ ultraneotenious tall and scrawny population. It would be EXTREMELY BEAUTIFUL to see this.
Except that:
Blacks have more progressive traits than other races
-Humans have the highest penis to body ratio of every primates and black men are on top of this hierarchy
-Afro hair is found in no other animal but humans, especially black humans
-Blacks have the highest legs to torso ratio of any primates
-Dark skin is not primitive since primates living in subtropical lattitudes have pale skin.
-Homo sapiens have smaller brains than Neanderthals
-Blacks have very low pilosity
-Blacks tend to have thinner but more efficient muscles
-Certain black populations have predispositions for taller height
You selection criteria are still perfectible my friend.
Yes but the other races have MORE PROGRESSIVE TRAITS DIRECLY LINK TO INTELLIGENCE.
Ok, tell me more.
Bad news for you, athleticism is highly correlated with fluid intelligence. Neoteny as well and blacks tend to be more neotenous than caucasians, we keep baby noses, our skin stays youthful much longer than whites, just to give a few examples that come to my mind quickly.
Yes but that has NOTHING to do with INTELLIGENCE which is the most evolved traits in all life on earth.
Blacks have BIGGER JAWS , are MORE PROGNATHOUS
Black have SMALLER BRAIN .
ORIENTALS have the BIGGEST BRAIN SO THEY ARE MORE ORTHOGNATHOUS AND HAVE THE SMALLEST JAWS.
How The FUCK do you explain that blacks have big prognathic jaws and small brain (more like ape) ?
Black’s brain capacity is 94% of that of whites and it is mostly due to malnutrition, and ill-attended pregnancies that cause higher frequency of low birth weight and preterm-birth.
Proganthism is a tropical feature, it appears exagerated in blacks du to big lips but it is actually not much pronounced than in other tropical populations like Central Americans and South-East Asians. Subtropical non-human primates have little to no prognathism at all. And the oldest human race, the Bushmen have Asian-like flat faces.
STOP LYING I CANT ARGUMENT IF YOU ARE LYING ALL THE TIME DO YOU UNDERSTAND ?
Instead of saying that i’m lying you should rather show that I’m lying.
According to Wikipedia, characteristics of the Negroid race are:
In modern craniofacial anthropometry,
Negroid describes features that typify skulls of black people. These include a broad and round nasal cavity; no dam or nasal sill; Quonset hut-shaped nasal bones; notable facial projection in the jaw and mouth area (prognathism); a rectangular-shaped palate; a square or rectangular eye orbit shape;[22] a large interorbital distance; a more undulating supraorbital ridge;[23] and large, megadontic teeth.[24]
It is estimated that cranial analysis yields a 77%-95% rate of accuracy in determining the racial origins of human skeletal remains.[23] Although widely used in forensic anthropology, some have challenged the accuracy of craniofacial anthropometry vis-a-vis different human populations that have developed in close proximity to one another and those of mixed ethnic heritage.[25] Since the distinguishing racial traits are not set until puberty, they are also difficult to ascertain in preadolescent skulls.[23]
Neoteny[edit]
Ashley Montagu lists “neotenous structural traits in which…Negroids [generally] differ from Caucasoids… flattish nose, flat root of the nose, narrower ears, narrower joints, frontal skull eminences, later closure of premaxillary sutures, less hairy, longer eyelashes, [and] cruciform pattern of second and third molars.”[13] He also suggested that in the extinct Negroid group termed the “Boskopoids”, pedomorphic traits proceeded further than in other Negroids.[13] Additionally, Montagu wrote that the Boskopoids had larger brains than modern humans (1,700 cubic centimeters cranial capacity compared to 1,400 cubic centimeters in modern-day humans), and the projection of their mouth was less than in other Negroids.[13] He believed that the Boskopoids were the ancestors of the Bushmen.[13]
Hair[edit]
Afro-textured hair is tightly coiled, kinky hair. It is a ubiquitous trait among Negroid populations. By consequence, the presence of looser, frizzly hair texture in other populations has often been considered an indication of possible admixture with Negroid peoples.[26]
Commenting on the lack of body hair (glabrousness) of Negroids and Mongoloids, Carleton S. Coon wrote that “[b]oth negroid and mongoloid skin conditions are inimical to excessive hair development except upon the scalp.”[27]
Skin pigmentation[edit]
Skin pigmentation in Negroid populations varies from very dark brown to light brown.[11] As dark skin is also relatively common in human groups that have historically not been defined as “Negroid”, including many populations in both Africa and Asia, it is only when present with other typical Negroid physical traits such as broad facial features, Negroid cranial and dental characteristics, prognathism, afro-textured hair and neoteny, that it has been used in Negroid classification.[26] Populations with frequently dark skin yet on the whole lacking the suite of Negroid physical traits were thus usually not regarded as “Negroid”, but instead as either “dark Caucasoid” (e.g. Hamitic/Ethiopid and Arabid) or “Australoid” depending on their other salient physical attributes. By contrast, populations with relatively light skin yet generally possessing typical Negroid physical characteristics, such as the Khoisan, were still regarded as “Negroid.”[26]
At this link, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongoloid , a craniofacial comparative of Mongoloids, Caucasoids and Negroids is presented. It appears that the HBD hierarchy does not exist. It would be interesting that Pumpkin highlights this chart made from a 2011 study.
Cranial form: broad in Mongoloids, medium in Caucasoids, long in Negroids.
Sagittal outline: high and globular in Mongoloids, high and rounded in Caucasoids, higly variable with post-bregmatic depression in Negroids
Nose form: medium in Mongoloids, narrow in Caucasoids, broad in Negroids.
Nasal bone size: small in Mongoloids, large in Caucasoids, medium to small in Negroids.
Nasal profile: concave in Mongoloids, straight in Caucasoids, concave/straight in Negroids.
Nasal spine: medium in Mongoloids, prominant and straight in Caucasoids, reduced in Negroids.
Nasal sill: medium in Mongoloids, sharp in Caucasoids, dull/absent in Negroids.
Incisor form: shoveled in Mongoloids, blade in Caucasoids, blade in Negroids.
Facial proganthism: moderate in Mongoloids, reduced in Caucasoids, extreme in Negroids.
Alveolar prognathism: moderate in Mongoloids, reduced in Caucasoids, extreme in Negroids.
Malar form: projecting in Mongoloids, reduced in Caucasoids, reduced in Negroids.
Palatal form: parabolic/elliptic in Mongoloids, parabolic in Caucasoids, hyperbolic in Negroids.
Orbital form: round in Mongoloids, rhomboid in Caucasoids, round in Negroids.
Mandible: robust in Mongoloids, medium in Caucasoids, gracile with gonial angle in Negroids
Chin projection: moderate in Mongoloids, prominent in Caucasoids, reduced in Negroids
Chin form: median in Mongoloids, bilateral in Caucasoids, median in Negroids.
Breast size by country:
http://i.huffpost.com/gen/584318/thumbs/o-BOOB-MAP-570.jpg?4
Wikipedia’s not really a reliable source when it comes to HBD. There are tons of anti-HBDers who monitor Wikipedia constantly and immediately revert anything pro-HBD.
AFROSAPIENS , HOW THE FUCK DO YOU EXPLAIN THAT PEOPLE FROM THE TROPIC HAVE A PROGNATHIC JAW IF IT IS NOT LINKED TO BRAIN SIZE ?
Because jaw and brain are pretty unrelated body parts that have different functions.
Its not true but i will admit this is true, so why thiese differences in prognathism, you havent answer to my question ????
If proganathism is a tropical feature, the black-white difference is due to the fact that blacks evolved in a tropical environment while whites did not. I don’t freaking know why prognathism is better suited for the tropics and flatter faces better for subtropical latitudes. All I know is people don’t think with their jaw and any prognathism-intelligence link appears ridiculous.
Now Darwin, you must know that I’m not wanting to waste more time with a 12 yo child. However, Pumpkin Person should think twice about the kind of persons his theories attract or maybe he’s a teen too.
Mais bon, après tout, la vérité sort de la bouche des enfants 🙂 .
Just to make you think, why do non-Africans have monkey-like hair or monkey-like mouths with almost no lips ?
If we start a who’s the most monkey-like contest, there are actually fewer chances that blacks win than you would expect.
How do you explain that we become more and more orthignathous during evolution from a monkey like creature ?
We don’t, distance from the Equator is the best indicator of the frequency of prognathism. Neanderthals had no prognathism for instance.
Brain size is the best indicator of prognathism and, among humans, brain size correlate well with distance from the equator. But brain size isnt a direct effect of “distance from the equator”, for example Chimps are more prognathous than Africans while living under the same latitude, why ? because they have smaller brains, and a big brain with a very prognathic face is not stable. Neanderthals have bigger brains than Sapiens, so its not surprising they had no prognathism.
But, what is your theory about prognathism variations if its not linked with brain size ?
Just to make you think, why do non-Africans have monkey-like hair or monkey-like mouths with almost no lips ?
Yes, thats true. Africans are not more monkey-like than the others on all the physical traits. BUT, because there is a but, they are more monkey-like on ALL the physical traits directly caused by brain size.
Black’s brain capacity is 94% of that of whites and it is mostly due to malnutrition, and ill-attended pregnancies that cause higher frequency of low birth weight and preterm-birth.
Evidences are needed here 🙂
And the oldest human race, the Bushmen have Asian-like flat faces.
Also true BUT Bushmen are hunter gatherer and are largely monogamous, so there is no competition between males for being the most masculine.
Bushmen have no notion of marriage at all.
There are various interpretations of prognathism. The one that dominates is that tropical populations are more vegetarian whereas subtropical peoples are more carnivorous. Your brain size/prognathism correlation is sloppy because:
African average brain size is about 94% that of white (make the calculation from Rushton’s own statistics). If the correlation with proganathism was so great, the differences between blacks and whites on this trait would not be as obvious, it would be like the differences in average brain size which are almost impossible to perceive from folk empirical observation.
Asians tend to be more prognathous than whites whereas their brains are pretended to be bigger.
Then what is the value of brain size. The mainstream position is that brain size – intelligence correlation is 0.33 whereas blacks have 94% of white’s brain size (crani. That’s not a lot, and it is thought to be indirect: environmental factors that increase brain size also improve cognitive efficiency.
Does an organ need to be bigger to be more efficient ? Neanderthal’s big brains seem not to have given them any superiority when confronted to Sapiens. Is a big liver, a big heart or a big lung more efficient
“Then what is the value of brain size. The mainstream position is that brain size – intelligence correlation is 0.33 whereas blacks have 94% of white’s brain size (crani. That’s not a lot, and it is thought to be indirect: environmental factors that increase brain size also improve cognitive efficiency.
Does an organ need to be bigger to be more efficient ? Neanderthal’s big brains seem not to have given them any superiority when confronted to Sapiens. Is a big liver, a big heart or a big lung more efficient”
My laptop posted the comment while I had not finished, don’t really kno why.
Then what is the value of brain size. The mainstream position is that brain size – intelligence correlation is 0.33 whereas blacks have 94% of white’s brain size (cranial capacity actually). That’s not a lot, and it is thought to be indirect: environmental factors that increase brain size also improve cognitive efficiency. And with a black and white brain size gap so narrow and a correlation so weak, it is dubious that this difference has a lot of effect behaviorally and intellectually.
One thing I also forgot to mention about marriage and polygamy in Africa, or at least West Africa.
Your theory that polygamy has selected africans for hyper masculinity is not tenable because.
1- traditional marriages in Africa are arranged, spouses do not marry because they fall in love for each other but because their union will materialize the alliance of their respective families. If spouses are let free to chose each other, masculinity or looks are not really taken into consideration because what’s more important is what I’ll mention below:
2- In (west) Africa, men have priority over other men in the selection of women according to their social status and their age. Rich men and old men come first, if the marriage is not arranged, a woman will rather agree to the proposal of a rich and older man than a poor young and handsome man. This mating patterns are eugenic by nature.
3- Women are to totally dependent on men because marriage is the only way for them to access land and farm material that are the property of men. I heard some theories about “independent black women” in Africa but it’s bogus, that only exists in American ghettos or other westernized black populations. The status of a woman in traditional Africa is halfway between that of a slave and a child.
4- How does HBD explain the tradition of polygamy in China ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_marriage#Polygamy
Oh, Pumpkin, it’s not credible unless it tells the story you want to hear.
Wikipedia’s chart was derived from that study
Blumenfield, J. (2011). Racial Identification in the Skull and Teeth. Totem: The University of Western Ontario Journal of Anthropology. 8(1), page 21-33.
For breast sizes, the map was taken from Bild, one of the most established German newspaper.
http://www.bild.de/ratgeber/2012/brust/busen-weltkarte-russland-skandinavien-ueber-d-koerbchen-23808826.bild.html
Black-Asian similarity is not confined to morphology, we both also have very high frequency of tonal languages and absolute pitch. And this appears to be controlled by genetics. If you think tonal languages are trivial, I’m going to tell you what it means. It means having 3 dimensional speech (Tones, consonants, vocals) while non-tonal is only 2 dimensional speech (consonants, vocals).
The HBD hierarchy doesn’t hold if we do not restric selection to the traits that make it appear.
Rushton’s theory never predicted that Mongoloids and Negroids are opposites on all traits. Only on r/K traits.
Rushton’s theory is wrong and has been almost unanimously dismissed because humans are a K species and they have no valid biologic races.
Yes humans are a very K species. That’s why Rushton called his theory differential K, arguing that even among a very K species, some are more K than others.
Except that the bases of his theory were proven wrong and took no account of behavioral/social changes across time.
Decreases in fertility for instance are known as demographic transition, it accompains development as the costs of raising children as well as their survival rates increase.
In the 1960s, China had similar fertility rate to subsharan Africa. It took the one child policy to lower them up to negative natural growth.
And the fact that a population is on the verge of extiction due to low fertility, which is the case of East Asians and some Europeans, is rather bad news in an evolutionary outlook that wants the fittest to have higher reproductive success than the less adapted.
Here’s for penis size.
http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?reportId=3073
The penis size maps actually confirms Rushtons theory.
Not really, Tanzanian could not have penises in the same size range as the Chinese.
PUMPKIN PERSON WHAT IS YOUR REAL NAME ?????
What do you think about an exmeriment in which we place crocodiles in an environment in which their population czn growth to 1 billion individuals and then making a EXTREMELY HARSH SELECTION FOR INTELLIGENCE (and intelligence only) ? It would be interesting to see those big brained crocodiles change their morphology and have organize social comportement and develop language. I cant even imagine what it would look like, it is so fascinating.
Hahaha, LOLWUT?
http://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/dinosaurs/anatomy/Brain.shtml
it should give you an indication of the difficulty of what you are suggesting.
Age at first sexual experience
Sexual activity
Sexual satisfaction
Nigerians have less sex than average but are more satisfied with it. They do less but better.
Approximatively 50% of the nigerian male population is composed of rapists, thats why they appear to have less conventionnal sex than the other countries.
Wow, where do you get this statistics from ? Nigeria’s marriage rate is so high that Nigerian men are greatly satisfied with their own wives and don’t go raping other men’s wives.
Surveys give an underestimation of the sexual activities in countries where sex is taboo.
activity*
How can sexual activity be taboo in a population that is supposed to be genetically programmed for hyper-active sexuality ? These statistics are accurate, the study was ordered by Durex who needed that kind of information for its marketing strategy.
Abortions by country
What is your point with this map ?
I shows that among other things, China’s low fertility rate is greatly artificial. High sexual activity is balanced by very high abortion and contraception rates.
Contraception by country
Just a series showing why Rushton’s r/K theory is BS.
…no.
Average brain size of indigenous populations:
The closer you are from the equator the smaller the brain size is, it confirm rushtons theory. The exceptions(i.e. Arctic people) are linked to population size.
Exceptions about the IQ/brain size link.
This means Iran will be allowed to do more intensive testing of advanced centrifuges than it was permitted during the nuclear talks. The Obama administration will claim provisions of the deal requiring Iran to dilute or send out of the country its reactor-grade enriched uranium stockpile is a great victory.
So you oppose the deal?
Yes, he oppose the deal.
The terms of Obama s deal with Iran failed to achieve the goal of denying Iran the capacity to build a nuclear bomb. By lifting sanctions, this enabled Iran s theocratic rulers to increase their ability to advance further into Iraq, since the international community is removing the sanctions, and Iran is keeping its nuclear program, this making Shia Iran the major competitor for leadership in the Muslim world after Turkey, while beating Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies who fear Iran’s influence among their own Shia populations.
Why are constantly changing your username ?