Digit Span is a subtest where the examiner reads a series of digits (one per second) and you must repeat those digits right back from memory. The easiest level would be repeating one digit, the second easiest would be repeating a two digit series, and then a three digit series etc. Typically, you get two attempts at each level of difficulty, and once you fail both, the test ends, and the longest series you passed is considered your digit span. So if you can repeat a six digit series but fail both attempts at the seven digit level, you are assigned a digit span of six.
A more difficult version of the test is backwards digit span, where the concept is the same except you repeat the digits in reverse order. Backwards digit span correlates twice as well with general intelligence as forward digit span, thus I was fascinated to discover that supremely influential neoconservative Charles Krauthammer obtained a backwards Digit Span of 12, despite being tested while driving “through traffic at 70 miles per hour on the New Jersey Turnpike”. To put a score of 12 in perspective, the average mentally healthy American (aged 45-54, which I presume was Krauthammer’s age range when tested) has a backwards Digit Span of 4.8 (SD = 1.5). So Krauthammer was 4.8 SD above the mean for his age and generation, roughly equivalent to an IQ of 172.
Of course backwards Digit Span is a very rough measure of IQ, and the figure 172 is so incredibly high that it should be treated with great skepticism. But having said that, there are several demographic details that raise the probability that Krauthammer is super smart: 1) he’s an Ashkenazi Jews, and this population has arguabley the highest IQ in the World, 2) he’s a physician who is board-certified in psychiatry and discovered a new form of manic depressive disease, 3) he attended Harvard, and 4) he’s one of the most influential people on the planet.
Indeed the Financial Times crowned Krauthammer the most influential commentator in America, saying “Krauthammer has influenced US foreign policy for more than two decades. He coined and developed ‘The Reagan Doctrine’ in 1985 and he defined the US role as sole superpower in his essay ‘The Unipolar Moment,’ published shortly after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Krauthammer’s 2004 speech ‘Democratic Realism’, which was delivered to the American Enterprise Institute when Krauthammer won the Irving Kristol Award, set out a framework for tackling the post-9/11 world, focusing on the promotion of democracy in the Middle East.”
Iconic blogger Steve Sailer writes:
Considering all the cleverness Krauthammer devoted to getting America stuck in Iraq, I’m reminded of something Maxwell Smart said after triumphing over a supervillain: “If only he had used his genius for niceness instead of evil.”
Regardless of whether you agreed or disagreed with the 2003 Iraq war, the fact that this paraplegic Krauthammer could help dictate the foreign policy of the World’s sole super power from the comfort of his computer keyboard, indicates towering intellect.
Intelligence is arguably the mental ability to adapt; to take whatever situation you’re in and turn it around to your advantage. If you believe in ethnic genetic interests, it behooved Krauthammer’s gene pool to rid the World of Saddam Hussein since he was an extremely powerful enemy of the Israeli people who not only fired scud missiles at Israel, but was funding Palestinian suicide bombers, and may have had nuclear ambitions. Thus one could argue that by brilliantly rising to the top of America’s intelligentsia and persuasively arguing for regime change, Krauthammer greatly increased his inclusive genetic fitness.
This is an example of how natural selection is still operating on human intelligence. Israel has arguably the highest IQ of any country in the Middle East, and it’s territory keeps expanding, while Arab territory keeps shrinking. But it’s not because the Israelis are outsmarting the Arabs themselves, but rather it’s because Israelis have ethnic genetic links to super high IQ people in the United States who know how to adapt American foreign policy to Israel’s advantage in a subtle enough way that most Americans don’t catch on. By contrast, there are far fewer Arab Americans smart enough to influence U.S. foreign policy the way Krauthammer has, and as a result, natural selection is favoring Jews over Arabs.
However Krauthammer may have met his match with the highly intelligent president Obama, who may have an ethnic genetic interest (or at least a cultural interest) in advancing Muslims since a great many black Africans are Muslim including some of Obama’s own family. Can Krauthammer use his 172 IQ to convince Americans that Iran is an imminent threat to America, despite Obama’s arguments to the contrary?
Other monotone text .
Your ”geniuses” are evil.
Pumpkin blog= gossip of so-called ”geniuses” and multiples misunderstood of ”intelligence” ( with few good insights).
The subtitle of this blog may can be correct when use the word ”horror”.
Iran is a threat???? Iran is not a threat, is a self-mistake, as well all ”nations” too.
If PP blog express hbd political point of views, then hbd itself also will be a neocon.
The same thinking about reporters can be apply with PP
Just a useful idiot or a aware neocon???
Iran is a threat,
ashkeNAZIS are a wonderfull super smart ”people”…
Israel feels threatened by Iran because it’s so close to Israel. Even if it never gets nuclear weapons, it’s a potential economic and political player on the World stage that could be taken very seriously by other countries in the World. It’s not really in Israel’s interest to have a Muslim country in the region become stable and powerful.
Yes, i do, but it shouldn’t congrtulated because inocent people are being killed by these two beasts.
Natural selection or unconscious selection happen when environment contextual conditions ”select” the better adapted.
Talmud is not a product of non-human nature but by psychopaths who use it to cause conflicts against other peoples, a primitive Il Principe di Macchiavelli.
Arabs and europeans are victims of dangerous parasitic human beings and no have nothing good to be contemplated, otherwise, is sad.
Damn- a backward digit span of 12 while driving? My longest is 8 while sitting in a quiet office. I guess it’s time for me to go sit in a corner and cry
I’ve never been impressed by this guy, though— not once. Nothing about him— whether his moral outlook or his political acumen, or just his general presentation (yes, I know he’s paraplegic) impresses me. Just seems like another neocon parroting neocon ideas to me.
The correlation between IQ and moral wisdom must be very low. Very low. Since Jews have high IQs, though, they get to run everything. It has nothing to do with EGI; Jews (along with other high IQ people) are just using the Middle East war to line their pockets.
And Barack Obama isn’t strong enough, in terms of intellect or willpower, to stand up to the folks who want war.
The correlation between IQ and moral wisdom must be very low. Very low.
Only if you believe (as you said) that he’s promoting this foreign policy to line his pockets. I don’t buy that. I think he has a deep passionate love in his heart for Israel and is genuinely concerned about her safety. So from his perspective, it seems very moral. He probably compares it to stopping to Hitler during WWII.
However there are people who have jumped on the neocon bandwagon (i.e. Cheney) probably for money.
I’ve never been impressed with him either. Very overrated.
Kate is spot-on as usual. The man is overrated. And I doubt his high Digit Span score proves much. The better you do on the test, the longer the test lasts since you keep being challenged with longer & longer sequences.
As a result, the better you do on the test, the more practice you get on the test. The more practice you get on the test, the better you do on the test.
It’s a vicious circle.
Holler if you hear me.
Only Kate has the intellect to see my point.
Bottom line is this dude is mediocre & not a genuine ultra high IQ mind like Kate & I.
Of course he is overrated, you don’t have to be a genius to understand that.
Btw, stop overrating yourself because you don’t show any evidences of genius, you are just avoiding risks of looking stupid by talking about things we can’t use to really determine your supposedly genius IQ.
May be you are not overrating you(and kate), but there are no evidences to support that.
So, for now, your comments about you having a genius IQ are useless.
As a result, the better you do on the test, the more practice you get on the test. The more practice you get on the test, the better you do on the test.
Sounds doubtful.
I almost wanna redact this comment….actually, don’t. But with the over-coverage of that XXXtentacle wrapper that’s died down here in Florida, I hardly saw anything about Mr. Krauthammer’s death, despite the fact he was 100x more important.
So RIH Mr. Krauthammer, and may you forever be remembered for your Digit Span rather than your neocon policies.
By ”Lucy” movie, in a natural way, smartest one will be super high functioning psychopaths. Lombroso said that majority of ”men of genius” he analysed were ”mattoid”, super smart but with moral deficits.
may be because they perceive others as animal because they are very very very stupid relatively to them.
btw, you must be a great fan of this blog, i see you everywere in the comment section 😉
Pumpkin person attrack more critics than real fans, and i’m one of this critics. But, i’m not just a critic, because i think PP is right about almost things that s(he) write here, specifically HBD stuff, because nothing is 100% right or wrong, and s(he) is proportionally right than wrong. My divergence start in geopolitical stuff. I no have idols.
yes, but you seem to be everywhere like litteraly EVERYWHERE.
it’s like he obssessed you.
Vsauce, why are you trying to silence Santoculto?
Just because he doesn’t share your neocon agenda?
”yes, but you seem to be everywhere like litteraly EVERYWHERE.
it’s like he obssessed you.”
I like to debate, just it. If i’m passing this impression, then i will go out here.
Don’t let Vsauce silence you. I like what you’re saying.
Thanks!!
absolutely not, I have the right to ask him a question ?
Incredible.
btw you seem to be obssessed by santoculto, its like:
pumpkin>santoculto>white nationalist
may be, it follow your IQ hierarchy 😉
”btw you seem to be obssessed by santoculto, its like:
pumpkin>santoculto>white nationalist
may be, it follow your IQ hierarchy ;)”
huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuummmmmmmmmmmmmmmm,
nope
Why people think i’m less smarter than PP***
=(=(=(30 point IQ drop? Average American now genetically retarded?=)=)=)
You are obsessed with my pseudo-obsession about PP which are obsessed with IQ.
May be you are smarter than him, it wasn’t a serious and scientific analysis, it was just based on the fact that he have more influence on you that you have on him, the same work for you and white nationalist.
People thinks you are less smart than pumpkin because your english isn’t your first language.
30 IQ point drop ? No way.
I am not obsessed, I have wrote only 2 comments….pumpkin is indeed obsessed with IQ.
Yes. I’m not studying english, i no have any great motivation for it.
I agree with you partially but i don’t think PP have ”more” or ‘less’ influence than me. Why** PP Twitter have spider webs.
My theory to explain supposed higher popularity of this blog may can be found in the comment sections.
I visit regularly this blog exactly or specially to read what people comment because most of post wrote by PP look like this post, monotone.
Yes, Pumpkin’s blog can looks repetitive but you have to remember that he have learned things he talk about by himself, he isn’t an expert.
Yes, this blog is repetitive with the same old tired stuff.
But PP is more original than Jayman who acts like a craigslist for HBD.
IQ is an important topic in America. But it’s useless to talk about it, because America doesn’t care for eugenics or people with high IQ. Profits over intelligence.
But PP is more original than Jayman who acts like a craigslist for HBD
Hahahahaa…I’ve been trying to stay away from this blog so I can focus on real life commitments, but I’m genuinely interested in what you mean by that. PP focuses almost entirely on IQ topics with a little bit of celebrity-tabloid patter thrown in; Jayman on behavioral genetics as it relates to sexuality, child-rearing, American culture and other current issues, so I’m not sure how you can even compare the two. I think they’re both great in their own ways.
Yeah, IQ doesn’t and can’t measure the full scale of intelligence. No test can do that. It does however tell you something. People have different aptitudes and talents, IQ measures aptitude and talent in more academic areas.
Sports Talent, Musical Ability, Art Ability, Cooking, and loads of other things aren’t measure in IQ tests. Intelligence is the ability to learn, some people have better abilities to learn in certain areas.
just self-tested with this site and got 9. http://cognitivefun.net/test/10
digit span can be improved by practice
Very much so. In one study, people could only repeat 7 digits (forward) but after endless practice, some could repeat 100.
But when they were asked to repeat letters instead of digits, they were right back down to 7.
This suggests that training, education & mental exercise seems to just improve very narrow abilities, but does not improve intelligence in general or even short term auditory memory in general
Some recent research using the n back test has tried to claim that training effects have broad transfer but this resarch is very controversial
Can we conclude that anything we cannot improve by practice actually measures intelligence?
I wouldn’t draw that conclusion, but more research is needed.
Some of the best intelligence tests are very sensetive to practice because they require novel problem solving, & once you’ve seen them, they’re no longer novel.
Tests that can’t be improved with practice are often just tests that we’ve practicing our whole lives so more practice has diminishing returns (i.e. reading comprehension)
Though some tests (i.e. lateral thinking) are both novel & insensetive to practice & excellent measures of intelligence.
Improve with practice but decrease with non-practice. Just the first score ( in perfect conditions) which should leave into account.
But generally this ( static and ”pure” ) cognitive tests ”measure intelligence”, unbrella concept in some way, in some part of it. Give the right weight to ”things”.
I’m not sure the correlation is as accurate as you think. I can get around 9-10, and I’ve never tested over 140.
This man’s IQ is nowhere near 172.
Backwards digit span is a very rough proxy for IQ. It may indeed have overestimated him
Why are you saying “rough” when, in reality, backward digit span has a 0.71 correlation with g?
Because I’ve heard the correlation is only 0.6 (Jensen 1998), but even 0.71 is rough. The Wechsler has a g loading of 0.9+
Digit Span = ((IQ – 100)*0.1) + 4.8
Backwards Digit Span*
Could someone with a 115 IQ do what he did?
Also, how strong would you classify a .7 correlation. I believe this is the correlation Digit Span has with IQ?
Also, do you believe in the multiple intelligence theory?