The other day I was talking to my good friend and famous blogger Robert Lindsay, one celebrity to another. Robert Lindsay is a great example of how super smart people can suck at math and not do well on the SAT. He writes:
Yes, I have a genius IQ (over 140) but I have never, I mean never been good at math, especially higher math. And that means algebra and geometry. All of my family except my Dad have or had genius IQ’s, and we are all awful at math. I barely got through Algebra in high school, and I sucked at geometry. My math scores were so poor that they kept me out of the UC system, much to my father’s dismay and anger as he wanted to me to go to UCLA. My sister barely got through Statistics to get her social sciences degree. My SAT scores are not even that great.
According to Lindsay, his 140+ IQ is well authenticated, having been obtained on both the WISC and the WAIS-R (the Wechsler scales are probably the best IQ tests in existence, having g loadings of 0.9+). And you can tell he’s extremely bright because he can write very long interesting posts about many different kinds of topics from psychology, to anthropology to politics. He just knows so much about so much, and general knowledge is one of the strongest signs of IQ. He even looks intelligent with the glasses (myopia is genetically linked to IQ) and the pale skin.
Not only is his IQ extremely high, but it’s extremely lopsided with his social IQ > logic IQ. This is a pattern you see more often in women and blacks than in white or Mongoloid men, and I believe it’s a throwback to a more primitive stage of evolution when humans were more sexual and schizophrenic; less nerdy and autistic. A commenter here felt that Lindsay and I are kind of opposites on this spectrum I describe.
So even though Lindsay wears glasses (a nerdy trait), he has dated many women and is hyper aware of the signals they are sending him. One problem with a high social IQ is having such a strong Theory of Mind makes one perceive minds even where they don’t exist, putting one at risk for believing in God, ghosts, UFOs and Sasquatch, and indeed Lindsay’s blog posts about Bigfoot are wildly popular.
I saw firsthand how acute Lindsay’s social IQ can be when he banned from his blog for so-called “right-wing politics”. This was before I was famous of course. No one would dare ban me now. At the time I decided to sneak back onto his blog pretending to be an old lady. Lindsay immediately saw through the ruse. “NO WAY IS THAT GUY A WOMAN!” he screamed. “NOT IN ANY POSSIBLE UNIVERSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”
Pingback: Pumpkin Person Post about Me | Beyond Highbrow - Robert Lindsay
Robert Lindsay is interesting, and has a wide breadth of knowledge like many high verbal IQ people (think of Malcolm Gladwell). However, mathematics ability is one of the best indicators of general intelligence, and it’s quite a rare person who can barely even pass Algebra but still claims to possess an full scale IQ > 130. In other words, I need more evidence.
And you and Robert aren’t “opposites”. While you may be more quantitative than he is, you’re nowhere close to the real heavyweights: Steve Hsu, Emil Kirkegaard, Audacious Epigone, Meng Hu, or Nate Silver (to thrown in a non-HBD example). You rely too much on “fuzzy math” to make estimations— which is fine for the purposes of your blog, but doesn’t make you a quant genius.
What’s your college level mathematics and statistics background, just out of curiosity?
And you and Robert aren’t “opposites”. While you may be more quantitative than he is, you’re nowhere close to the real heavyweights: Steve Hsu, Emil Kirkegaard, Audacious Epigone, Meng Hu, or Nate Silver (to thrown in a non-HBD example). You rely too much on “fuzzy math” to make estimations— which is fine for the purposes of your blog, but doesn’t make you a quant genius.
I would never dream of comparing myself to the mathematical heavyweights you name, but I also wouldn’t call it fuzzy math. It’s certainly not complex math, but it’s clear, elegant, simple math. And while skeptics may dismiss it as statistical competence, I bet if you showed it to a really brilliant math mind like Steve Hsu, he would agree with it.
What’s your college level mathematics and statistics background, just out of curiosity?
I was a social science major, so while there was a bit of stats, it wasn’t the focus. The math I do on this blog was shown to me by one of the 10 highest IQ people in the United States, it wasn’t anything I learned in school.
I got through Algebra ok, but I did not like it. Algebra 2 was a bitch. I think I needed special tutoring all through summer for either Algebra 2 or Geometry, I forget which. I think I had summer tutoring for Algebra 2 and then got a C-. Geometry I got a D.
If people with IQ’s over 130 who are not so great at higher math are so rare, why are there 5 of them in my family alone?
I bet if you showed it to a really brilliant math mind like Steve Hsu, he would agree with it.
Dunning Kruger as f***
Hey, given your sassy smart-assness, why haven’t you started your blog yet?
LOL I’d love to get a live reaction of Steve reading that comment.
LOL I’d love to get a live reaction of Steve reading that comment.
Steve’s good with concepts. He wouldn’t struggle to understand pumpkin’s very basic statistics like so many others have.
Can democracy survive such widespread statistical illiteracy ?
Lindsay interesting?! Since when?! For cryin’ out loud, he’s a friggin’ bigot and hypocrite!
Also, if Robert Lindsay is high on the schizotypy spectrum, as seems to be the case due to his 40 point verbal-spatial IQ differential, and his lack of full-time employment, wouldn’t that make him worse with women? People who read way too much into what other people are saying (which schizos do) tend to have lower genetics fitness and less mating success, not higher.
actually, scratch the part about the 40 point IQ differential, schizos have lower IQs overall, not just in spatial
Also, if Robert Lindsay is high on the schizotypy spectrum, as seems to be the case due to his 40 point verbal-spatial IQ differential
verbal-math differential…I don’t know if he has a large verbal-spatial differential.
,People who read way too much into what other people are saying (which schizos do) tend to have lower genetics fitness and less mating success, not higher.
There’s an optimum level of mentalizing for social understanding. If you under-mentalize you’re at risk for autism. If you over-mentalize, you’re at risk for schizophrenia…high social IQ people like Lindsay are high mentalizers, but not pathologically high.
I have good game supposedly, and I am said to be a bad boy. What it boils down to is I think I am I King of the World. I walk around like that all day and women just eat it up. Also I spent many years perfectly the art of being sexy as I saw it. Walking sexy, talking sexy, moving sexy, all that.
There are guys who can get laid no matter what. A lot of Alphas don’t even work. They are often unemployed or they are criminals and live off crime. They often live off women too, seldom paying their way. They’re bastards.
I haven’t the faintest idea if I am an Alpha (or Sigma) or not, and it is not my place to make that judgement. By at least one metric I am. But I can get laid even when I live in poverty, often with beautiful women. I just live off the women or have them pay for everything because I can’t afford to. They buy gifts, take on vacations, buy me plane tickets, put me up at their places, etc. I guess my part of the deal is to be a great companion.
That said, lack of funds really does get in the way of getting women. But trust me, it is quite common to find natural Alphas in their 30’s and 40’s with pretty much nothing to show for their lives, who have hardly worked or only work at low paid jobs or crime, and most commonly, who simply live off women. Jails and prisons are full of Alphas. These guys could probably get laid if they were homeless. Once you acquire “natural Alpha” type skills, they never really go away, no matter what happens in life. These guys are sort of indestructible self esteem wise. They think they are Gods and no amount of bad things that happen in life is ever going to change.
It was Geometry I could not get through. Algebra I passed, but Algebra 2 was a real bitch and I got C’s. My mother and all my siblings have IQ’s over 140 (my Mom’s is 150) and we all struggled with higher math.
That said, I did get 70th percentile on the math test to get into junior college. I am not sure what that means. If it means 70th percentile for the population? Anyway, apparently I am better at math than 70% of the population. My whole family is like this. We are actually above average in math, but we are stymied at higher level math.
I do not know what to say about schizotypy other than it is probably associated with creativity. Musicians get a lot of pussy. I have known artists who got a lot of women too. And there are even a few writers who clean up. Women love to fuck artistic types. They are romantic.
It’s a great honor to have you posting on this blog!
Would you credit your success with women more to your looks or more to your game, or an equal mix of both?
One thing that fascinates me about your blog is how much life experience you’ve had. You seem to have had a very varied interesting life and experienced many different kinds of things.
Hilarious. This is coming from the guy who would kill me for my political beliefs.
Your article on the “White East Asians” is garbage.
The term “European” when it comes to studying Altaic peoples is a misnomer. They share affinities with Europeans. Meaning, the Neolithic people that Europeans are comprised of, one of which being Ancient North Eurasians. This is why they share affinities and some DNA, they come from the same base populations!
Moreover, the “Aryans” were a dark-haired, dark eyed people who had skin thay was darker relative to today’s Europeans. The Yamnaya people are the Aryans, the Indo-Europeans, the originators of the Indo-European languages. The Indo-European homeland in the East.
https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/07/16/nordicist-fantasies-the-myth-of-the-blonde-haired-blue-eyed-aryans-and-the-origins-of-the-indo-europeans/
I’ll go in depth tomorrow in a response article.
But your article is garbage. Muh white Chinese!!! Muh white Tarim mummies!!! Muh Tocharians!!!
All descended from Siberian populations and the only reason they share affinities with Europeans is due to ancient admixture!! All have majority Siberian haplotype with some showing some western European haplotype which is explained by migrations!!
I would also rather read an article by Razib Khan on Turkic languages than read a book with a paper in it by you if the joke of the article currently on your front page is how you do “research”.
I don’t have schizophrenia or schizotypal or anything like that. I have OCD. If I had any schizy like thinking, I would have done as well socially as I have. People who think like that cannot do well socially.
I don’t read too much into what other people say or do or even seem to think. I can actually pretty much read minds! I mean I can read the emotional content and any particular messages the person may be sending me in a pretty good way. I can’t read exactly what you are thinking of course. I can’t tell you if you are thinking of women or calculus or penguins or race relations or the novel you just read.
Overreading is a very bad idea. That leads to paranoia. I don’t do that. Thing is, when you can actually read people’s minds like I can, at least with me a lot of what I read or the messages they send me are relatively benign. People are not going around thinking evil things about me all day. In fact, I think most people are hardly thinking of me at all. I don’t read a lot of malicious stuff into people’s speech and body language because it usually just isn’t there. Now sometime it is, that’s for sure!
Overreading is a very bad idea. That leads to paranoia.
Hahahaha, YA THINK?
Hi women have been saying I was goodlooking for a long time. I was often told how handsome I was as a young man and I even had offers to be a male model. I actually still hear it to this day, mostly from women my own age.
Looks without game is more or less worthless, but women like goodlooking guys.
Good game is all about attitude and confidence. If you have really good game, you just exude it, and pretty soon, women are flirting with you and making passes at you a lot of the time. You sort of get this aura around you. I had a lot of success with females early in life and I gained a bit of a reputation on the block. It went to my head and success simply leads to more success. With each new woman you get, your aura grows more, and then you attract even more women. So the success leads to even more success.
It is a bit of a trap though as men with no confidence around women are screwed. You have to be confident to get women but you have to have some successes to be confident. It’s a trap.
The largest part of “game” is just having thick enough skin to find which women are interested and which women are not. A man with “game” is one who will talk to twenty women and go home with one. A man without “game” is a man who won’t talk to any women and consequently go home with none.
It is a bit of a trap though as men with no confidence around women are screwed
People, including women, are superficial. They ascribe positive characteristics to men they are attracted to; even the nerdiest introvert will gain a following of women if he is considered attractive.
However, most men are not physically outstanding. So most men are not attractive to a particularly high percentage of women…which means that higher than average success depends on finding whatever niche of women find him attractive.
The smaller part of “game” is, after at first blindly talking to women or having blind luck in getting successful with the women who are attracted to you, figuring out the “type” that is attracted to you. Once this happens, an individual will have much more success on the approach. That’s it and that’s all.
and it should be said for all the haters out there…
even if you’re a 6’3″ young brando (or denzel washington) look alike, some women will be indifferent…just a much smaller % than for the average guy.
more specifically, however good looking you are, the woman you’re most attracted to may find you repellent.
and gigolos are few and there are no heterosexual bathhouses and “chemical castration” works on male hormones, so you know women get turned on by status and money or, even more likely, are indifferent to ALL men but have been sold marriage and babies as sine-qua-nons of fulfillment.
it’s strange, but very good looking women, knockouts, tend to be the biggest sluts. knock and it shall be opend unto you.
but if you looked like a tall paul newman…(newman was quite short)…then….
it’d be a monsoon of pussies.
newman was half jewish/half irish…but he looked like a roman emperor…if i were a girl…
Mugabe is turning gay.
and i know from women and from those women i’ve been head over heels in love with (their voice was distinct)…
the VOICE is VERY important.
a woman can be a knockout at a distance…then you talk to her and she has a gross voice, and it’s a boner shrinker for sure.
paul newman had a great voice. he voiced over commercials. brando had a HORRIBLE voice in some ways in other ways, or the same ways, it made him distinct…and…
what’s the study that shows that just being distinct can make one more attractive?
me…i’ve learned from experience that i’m strongly attracted to women with harsh, whiny/accusatory voices. i’m a total perv in that respect. maybe it’s a bug like the Cockring hypothesized gay bug.
almost through with the 750mL of Cruzan white.
of course all of those women were knockouts…
or were they? i thougt they were…and still do!
a bit of social insight for the socially retarded pp…
men tend to explain their attraction to women as “she’s so beautiful.”
women tend not to explain their attraction to men as “he’s so handsome.”
but, IN FACT, examined objectively, so far as that’s possible,
men are NOT just attracted to women for how they look
AND
women ARE attracted to men mostly for their physical characteristics, how they look.
BUT
the genders “self-interpret” their attraction differently.
that is, men and women aren’t that different. bitch is the new nigger. whenever i see a woman in heels or long hair or make-up i think what a barbarous society i live in.
that frozen concoction that helps me hang on.
misdreavus,
hetero and homo aren’t explained by gynephile and androphile…blah, blah, blah.
because, like everything social, it’s relative to the society, the time, the place.
women are attracted to men and men to women because they are diffferent from themselves.
homosexuality is weird and totally un-Cynical (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diogenes_of_Sinope) whether it’s gays or lesbians, hence it’s identification with modernity and urbanity.
and even a self-identifying gay scientist on the bbc claimed that exclusive homosexuality is unique to humans. that is, inter alia, gay rams also fuck ewes, but most fags say “Ewwww!” to a pussy.
hence its identification…
btw, i attended buffett’s alma mater for a semester. it was Paul Morphy’s and my mother’s too. the second oldest Jesuit school in the US after GT.
well there’s gone the memory despite what prmethease says.
buffett may have never attended that school (???) but was married in the same chapel as my parents. a chapel i’ve been in and playedd Deutschland uber Alles on the piano…in the middle of the night of course…i am to night owls what Evel Knievel is to daredevils.
it’s all gone now. along with as much Paul Newman‘s Lemonade!
lemonade and rum. what’s that called?
on my resume it says, “special skills: losing things and breaking things.” but i’m….
rs17070145(T;T)
I spent years working on my voice. I already had a good voice by age 20. I would call up girls and they would say, “Hey, my roommate says you have a sexy voice…” What I did was I idolized this friend of mine. This guy would date 3-4 different women or girls every single day. Morning date, afternoon date, evening date, midnight date. And he would screw all of them. He had this certain way of talking. I just studied his voice and turned my voice into his and wa-la! Women still say I have a sexy voice, and I am 57 years old! Mostly women my age, but I was involved with a 26 yr old a year ago, and she said it too.
I would say a sexy voice is pretty important.
Looks are VERY important for a man. I hate to say it. Because…good-looking men make women horny. They make them want to fuck. You can have lots of power and money but if you have no looks, I dunno…Women like to fuck good-looking men. They are not so different from men in that regard as men like to fuck good-looking women.
Women care about looks, but I suspect they care most about height. Of course height is a part of looks, but a tall ugly scrawny guy or a tall ugly bald fat guy might do better than a short good looking athletic guy:
I’m suspicious over your claim that Robert Lindsay is famous since you cite yourself as famous and I’ve never heard of you.
Hahahahahaha.
Pingback: IQ vs math talent vs math performance | Pumpkin Person
LOL @ an unemployed man who can’t even comprehend high school level math being a “genius.”
I suspect the blog owner is propping up this loser to make himself feel better. He’s probably also another unemployed “genius.”
This blog is a joke.
LOL @ an unemployed man who can’t even comprehend high school level math being a “genius.”
Celebrity Robert Lindsay is not unemployed. He does various odd jobs and lives off a trust fund if I recall correctly.
I suspect the blog owner is propping up this loser to make himself feel better. He’s probably also another unemployed “genius.”
I’m the opposite of unemployed. I work so much I’m sleep deprived.
This blog is a joke.
Not really. It’s been cited by Scientific American, Salon, one of Canada’s best film makers, and even made Steve Sailer’s blog roll.
I live off a trust fund, and I also work as a therapist. I make some money writing and I do a few other things like brokering deals between consultants and clients, things like that. The reason I do not work is due to health. I am not in good enough health to work. Otherwise I have been working or in school my whole life. My last job title was Linguist/Cultural Anthropologist.
There is just no way that you have an IQ over 140+, you are too much of a dumbfuck to have that, and the reason why you stick to your blog and you don’t venture onto anthroforums like ABF etc, is because you would get exposed for the complete dumbfuck ass you are. If you really do have a high IQ which I don’t believe you do, then it’s really a living testament that IQ is useless when it comes to measuring any form of intelligence because you really are one of the biggest idiots I have ever seen.
BTW THE YEUZHI WERE NOT TURKIC YOU FUCKING IDIOT! THEY WHITE INDO-EUROPEANS, THERE IS ZERO PROOF THEY WERE TURKIC; BECAUSE FROM THE DESCRIPTIONS WE HAVE OF THEM, HAVING REALLY RED HAIR, REDDISH-WHITE SKIN, DRINKING LOTS OF ALCOHOL AND BEER, HAVING NON-MONGOLOID FACIAL FEATURES, HAVING FAMILIARITY AND PROFICIENCY WITH HORSES, AND BEING THE ANCESTOR’S OF THE KUSHAN’S, A KNOWN INDO-EUROPEAN WHITE SOCIETY IN SOUTHERN CENTRAL ASIA; IT’S CLEAR TO ANY NON-IGNORANT AND NON-IDIOTIC PERSON THAT THEY WERE WHITE INDO-EUROPEAN PEOPLES!
Why anyone would take a complete ignorant and idiotic ass like yourself as an “expert”, when you know ABSOLUTELY JACK SHIT about various subjects you talk about, LIKE THE ABOVE, WHICH IS VERY OBVIOUS; AND YOU CONSTANTLY MAKE SHIT UP. AND LIE. AND MAKE ALL SORTS OF LUDICROUS CLAIMS TO COVER UP YOUR IGNORANCE ON THESE SAME SUBJECTS, which your idiotic low brow commentators can’t seem to realize for some reason, is a mystery to me..
BTW why is your blog named “beyond highbrow” because there is no highbrow-ness quality on your blog AT ALL! And you are not high brow in the slightest which is compounded by the fact that a lot of your commentators on your blog are idiotic low-brow morons…..
Jack, that’s exactly how he sounds.
Typically Nordicist bullshit.
Genius means an IQ over 140 according to one popular metric. Others set it at 150. At any rate, genius in IQ terms simply means a number on a test. It doesn’t mean anything else. It has nothing to do with the term genius as we normally use it to refer to someone like Einstein or whatnot. So there are a two different definitions of genius. You would think that would be obvious, but so many retards can’t seem to figure that out.
I prefer my definition of genius: extraordinarily high accomplishment as judged by one’s peers and quantifiable output in at least a moderately g-loaded field. That excludes rappers, basketweavers, stock speculators, etc.
Oh and most social scientists
There is absolutely no way you have a real IQ over 140+, if so please take a modern IQ tests again and please give us the transcript results and verifiable authentic proof for that. You are just too much of a dumbfuck for me to believe that sorry!!!
Then all those who are in the mensa are geniuses, instantly ..
For two reasons I stopped commenting on your blog:
– You do not seem to have minimal ability to defend its conclusive opinion that there is a kind of ‘genius-higher iq’ ‘
– Their pre-conceptions of Latin American geopolitics, which are absolutely identical to a college student of history, to any public latin-american Marxist university, near to you …
In terms of ability to understand Latin American geopolitics you so far not shown any great creative insight, or even begin properly because your insistence that ‘Marxism in Latin America does work” if does not work in any place.
I can agree with you about the most important Marxist theories, for example, that human society is a class battle.
In terms of ability to understand such terms as intelligence, wisdom, creativity, empathy, etc., you do not seem to ‘match completely’ ‘ with your self-declared- iq high = ”genius”.
The most important is not only to understand ideationally, is to start using this better understanding regarding the dynamics that you perceive and experience it, it is wise ideationally self-actualization, the technique of wisdom.
Its insistence on reducing the term genius of IT simplest ”second type” is a possible evidence about what I am talking about here, not just me …
I appreciate your praise directed at my person, and I recognize your brilliance, better than yourself could do.
I told you, if you want all of Latin America turning into Cuba, then come back here living hell that this will become, if it already is without this communist plague, because being in the comfort of an upper middle class in the middle of California it is extremely easy to advocate it…
And again …. the fact that i criticize communism, acid but correctly, does not make me a capitalism lover, I hate it equally.
Genius, popularly, has been understood as an extraordinary achievement. The genius is in a completely new world called human creativity where things are ‘created from nothing’ ‘. It is therefore very complex define it because we are dealing with possibilities, with neo-patterns.
However, if there are many psychological, physiological, cognitive similarities or trends between humans who have been recognized as ‘geniuses’, then one can also say that there are some previous standards to the geniuse-level realization that may have contributed to this end.
The novelty of creative ideas is existentially evolutionary, because it consists of re-creating consciously nature itself, the ‘independent’ way.
” God ” created existence, creativity is the re-creation of existence.
There is no ‘genius-high iq’ ‘, there are people with great cognitive ability, only within a continuity with other psycho-cognitive layers.
Apparently, the genius has more in common with mental disorders than the normal distribution bell curve.
Genius relate primarily with creativity, with the verb ‘to create’ ‘.
If all those who score above 150 in iq tests are exceptional creators or at least 80% of them, then I will agree with you.
You resemble nordicists, medicists, afrocentrists. You collectivize individual achievements for himself, for allegedly belonging to the group ” of the smartest ‘.
Such a WN like to say
” WE, the whites, are the most creative race ”
You say
” WE, the higher IQs, are the most creative group ”
However, what are your creative achievements**
Perhaps, and it is very likely you lacks wisdom to judge yourself.
We live in societies that are organized in predominantly chaotic way because we live in massified societies that treat human beings as masses, and promoting the equally chaotic individual competition, where few humans with exceptional cognitive potential, the level of genius, can be able to create something extraordinary.
We do not know what is the meritocracy level for the most creative types, what is the degree of success among them (proportion of succesfull highly creative individuals) to know how harmful is being, or not so, this chaotic type of organization / social promotion, which focuses on the human ego, all your chips.
What is Robert’s verbal IQ? 180? This score spread is incredible!
He obtained a full-scale IQ of 140+ on the Wechsler scales, where the full-scale IQ was a function of verbal and performance IQ, unlike the SAT where the composite score is a function of verbal and math. Mediocre math skill would not especially hurt Robert on the Wechsler
I still don’t believe he has a 140+ IQ because of the time that he took the test’s at, and the questionable circumstance and background surrounding his doubtful IQ test, He has no real authentic proof or claim of evidence for it; and also because he reeks of too much dumbfuckery and stupidity on his blog posts for that to be true. But then again, that may be living testimony that IQ tests are not actually accurate measurements of intellectual prowess in the slightest so…..
Robert lknindsay is a cunt, who read a few books on his spare time but don’tow shit. its a big joke to hear this asshole claim he has a high IQ . but wasn’t good in math. He critizes the indian community somuch , trying his utmost best to degrade them but they simply see him as a jackass that really knows nothing about their history or circumstances, he has never even visited india but runs his mouth talking bullcrap on these people.the real scholarsand inventors in mathematical equations are the same indians he bash on his site. i would like to recommend him to the site of a man called, AJIT VAYADAKIL, HOPE i spelt it right . i would like to hear his comments after reading this man’s post. All in all , i think he had a bad case of heartbreak from a beautiful indian whose family didn’t think he was good enough. seriously , this is the feel i get from this man. He is also self hating. He seriously looks like he has a touch of black blood in him, somewhat like mullatto portugese.
He banned me a few weeks ago for being a ‘Nazi’ and saying the truth thay socialism has killed more people than any other political system.
He wants his safe space and doesn’t want to hear the truth.
First, Portuguese mulatto is a strange term because usually it consists of different concepts. It is true that in a globalized world we can find this combination. However, it does not consist of an intrinsic relationship, as the founder effect of the Portuguese people have not had great presence in sub-Saharan its initial genetic stock. However, the world changes.
Second, it is perfectly possible to score high on some cognitive tests and low in others, so your argument contrary to the assertion of Lindsay as to their scores on cognitive tests not hold.
Third, I agree that he exaggerates a lot in his criticism of the Indian people, like you guys had invented the devil. However, the opposite is also wrong if all people have moral strengths and weaknesses, has to be considered when necessary, but it seems, even when there seems to be weighted, it will still be necessary.
I find it difficult to discern Robert Lindsay. He just another Anglo Prole White, who vacillates back and forth, between ideologies, and never get anywhere.
He is correct to say America and the Anglo Prole Sphere in general, is right wing. They made the Nazis in Germany look like nice guys. And it’s true, Hitler didn’t hate the Muslims or the Japanese. He believed in separatism. Anglo Proles are sadistic bi polar savages.
//the real scholarsand inventors in mathematical equations are the same indians he bash on his site//
and what’s the source of your claim?
Please, don’t give us RSS articles.
Rob Lindsay looks very gamma.
But the ultimate gamma is….drumroll:
Dan Senor, Zion’s attache to Mitt Romney. Source of the Trump locker room tape to destroy Trump against Hillary (because Zion’s neocons are not loyal to Republicans), and general schemer, semanticologist, brainwasher and white people genocider extraordinaire.
In a patriotic country, Dan Senor would be publicly tortured.
What you look for in the gamma according to Mr Fascist Nick Krauser is:
1. Slender shoulders
2. Preeny face and eyes.
3. High IQ
4. Always lying and can’t accept alpha dominance so has to depose alpha (i.e. with black alphas)
5. Soft features
6. Emotional
As JS pointed out a few weeks ago, Jews are notorious for having so many gamma males. Gammas are a disease on the social system. In olden times, they would have been bullied to death. But in our ‘enlightened’ religious times (they like to create religions/ideologies that stop Alpha violence against them – Nietzsche), they can breed.
Omega evolves to delta to beta to Alpha
Gamma evolves to sigma.
Evolving means tolerating the pain barrier of ego failure, physical threats, risk taking, impulse control and hard work….which gammas can’t do.
Krauser was once a gamma who became a sigma. Fascinating theory of social hierarchy.
What attracts women to men in my experience fr sex:
1.Fame.
2. Good looks
3. Height/Muscularity
4. Charisma/Social popularity
5. Schiz tendency
What attracts women to men in my experience fr being an ATM:
1. Job/Profession/Money
2. Height
3. Sensitivity
4. House
5. Shared social circle.
It depends a lot though on culture as well. Indian women tend to be a lot more K selected. As are East Asians.
MENAs and Africans are very r.
Black girls are so easy its laughable. Its the higher testosterone. Paki/Mid East women are close enough. They will approach me. Not the other way around.
Jew women are r as well.
No surprise. They lean schiz, are genetically MENA peoples, and extremely tribal which is a good indicator of R selection.
Honestly, for SEX it’s more like
1. Good looks (face + body)
2. Confidence/Humor etc.
1. Good looks (face + body)
….
….
…
…
2. Confidence/ Humor etc.
This. Women also love long hair. And confidence. And good looks. And height (though I’m average at 5 10). My hair alone has gotten me some women. They love it.
If you have to drill down dildos what’s better:
A man with an ugly face but a great body or vice versa?
And you can’t say you prefer dildos.
Fame kills it. But its so rare to the point you don’t need to think about it. Openly homosexual men and really ugly guys get laid from fame alone.
Philosopher
They usually go together. To have a great face, you’ve got to be in shape but face is definitely more important.
RR it depends on your face. Long hair doesn’t suit most guys IMO.
Women tell me they like long hair better than short hair. I think I look fine with long hair, and women agree.
What are you talking about? White girls are definitely the easiest race to sleep with.
They see my brown skin and assume I have a big dick and that Im a “hood nigga”
Blacks girls are only easy once they figure out I’m about that life.
This white girl with the fattest, nicest ass, I’ve ever had the pleasure to penetrate , would only sleep with mixed boys.
The lil blonde girl I’m fucking right now said If I was white she would not be into me.
Depends on where you live in the world.
But black girls have by far the highest libidos.
The one thing I’ll say that makes black girls different to all other races is that their bar for masculinity is higher. They tend not to go for K selected guys at all. So yeah, its not easy if you are an IT worker.
If you are hitting the gym – which every man should – then you have a decent shot.
You have to look like someone that can hurt people or who has edge. This is true for all girls. But especially blacks.
Thats why I laugh at the idea blacks can become civilized decent citizen types….its pretty obvious they select for primordial Kinshasa.
The other thing I’d say is that black women are by far the most neglected girls so any attention they get from a decent prospect they won’t blow you out. Life is very tough for a black woman. Funnily enough, because east asian girls get so much attention, I get blown out more there.
I remember an incident in club many years ago in Prague where this smokin asian girl literally had lads line up approaching her of all races. My buddy was the only guy that night that wasn’t blown out. My black buddy and I were. Hand to the face. Face Fiiiive!!!! Ouch.
Mixed race black girls tend to go for me even more. Rita Ora’s best friend used to always check me out in the gym back in the day. Very good looking woman. Faaane thaaang as you people are wont to say.
I would say the absolute worst thing you could be as a woman is an overweight schizophrenic black woman.
I would say the absolute worst that you could be as a man is an underweight east asian/indian autist guy.
OOHHH CAN YOU SEEE THE SYMMETRREEEE IN NATUREE
And autists of the world rejoiced.
Not so fast, it isn’t qute symmetrical…
#My other buddy. Me and my black buddy were facepalmed.
http://img2.bdbphotos.com/images/orig/u/8/u872telwpfal8u2f.jpg?djet1p5k
Thar she blows on the far right.
That picture was taken about 1 minute walk from where I used to live back in my glory days.
“You have to look like someone that can hurt people or who has edge. This is true for all girls. But especially blacks.”
I don’t really look aggressive I just act it. I realized a long time ago that 90% percent of people are pussies, You can buck to them and they won’t do shit. Every now and then you meet a real one, but that’s why I did boxing and MMA training when I was younger.
“east asian girls get so much attention”
Why? I like white girls more.
“My black buddy and I were. Hand to the face. Face Fiiiive”
Are you only white?
“OOHHH CAN YOU SEEE THE SYMMETRREEEE IN NATUREE
And autists of the world rejoiced.
Not so fast, it isn’t qute symmetrical…”
Why do I get the impression you’re a younger version of mugabe? I picture mugabe as this old ass schizo prole who hates the world, while you seem like a young, cycnical, mildy schizo alpha.
“Thar she blows on the far right.
That picture was taken about 1 minute walk from where I used to live back in my glory days.”
Well damn it won’t let me see it.
Robert Lindsay is good looking? Lol.
Also Lion of Judasphere has it the wrong way around. Verbal predicts g loading.
I would put money on someone like robert being passable at math and an autist not understanding the point of a poem completely and knowing anything beyond what’s spoonfed in the newspaper or textbook.
I don’t understand what makes him an HBD blogger. He hardly ever writes about HBD. Same with Sailer, it’s mostly politics with a bit of Hbd thrown in. I know he coined the term and he like, but he hardly talks about human diversity.